Time Of Hip Replacement Research Articles

Total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients - a single-center experience.

Background: As advanced age often leads to accumulating comorbidities, geriatric patients are endangered by serious events during total hip arthroplasty. This study was conducted to explore whether or not the benefit in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was comparable to younger patients. Methods: At a single academic center, 100 patients meeting the following inclusion criteria were retrospectively recruited: (1) primary arthritis of the hip leading to THA; (2) age 80 years or older at the time of surgery; (3) follow up of at least 12 months. For comparison, two further groups were recruited in the same manner, differing only in the age criterion: 100 patients aged 60–69 and 100 patients aged 70–79 at the time of hip replacement. The primary outcome was compared using the WOMAC and the EQ-5D score. The secondary outcome was determined by rates of orthopedic and non-orthopedic complications. Intragroup comparisons of the PROMS were performed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test for paired samples. For intergroup comparisons of the PROMS, the Kruskal–Wallis-test was performed. Concerning categorial data, intergroup comparisons were performed by the Chi-Square test. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: Concerning the WOMAC score, neither the absolute values at 12 months after THA (p = 0.176) nor the amount of change relative to the values before surgery (p = 0.308) differed significantly between the 3 groups. Concerning the EQ-5D index the absolute values at 12 months after THA differed significantly (p = 0.008). Rates of orthopedic complications did not differ significantly (p = 0.631). Rates of non-orthopedic complications increased significantly with rising age (p = 0.033). Conclusions: Compared to younger patients, geriatric patients after THA have an equal improvement in hip-specific and general HRQoL. While rates of orthopedic complications are comparable too, non-orthopedic complications occur more frequently.

The Hip-Spine Relationship: The Importance of Femoral Version

Recent investigations have confirmed the impact of spinopelvic mobility upon functional acetabular position. However, it is critical to remember the impact of femoral component position as it contributes to combined version of the hip joint. It has been demonstrated that implant position can affect articular wear, the potential for prosthetic impingement as well as a cause of joint instability. Ensuring an impingement-free range of motion at the time of hip replacement is critical to long-term survivorship. During hip reconstruction, there is significant latitude in acetabular component positioning but femoral component version is often dictated by native femoral anatomy and in some instances cannot be adjusted. Understanding the role that femoral version plays in prosthetic hip joint kinematics should provide surgeons with a better understanding of this complex relationship.

Juvenile rheumatoid diseases: Endoprosthetic care of destroyed hip joints

Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) often suffer from involvement of the hip joints, with joint destruction and related functional limitations, making hip replacement necessary. To discover what special features are to be expected in patients with JIA and hip arthroplasty and what impact they have on surgical indication, choice of implant, and technique. Selective literature review and evaluation of our patient population. Compared with osteoarthritis patients, JIA patients are on average much younger at the time of hip replacement. Owing to the onset of the disease in childhood or adolescence and the frequent glucocorticoid therapy, growth disorders or abnormal anatomical findings are common in these patients. Bone density is often reduced at an early age. The perioperative management of medication has to be planned. Special implants for patients with rheumatic diseases do not exist, but the above peculiarities of this group of patients should be considered for surgical procedure and choice of implant and material. Overall, the results of hip arthroplasty in juvenile rheumatic diseases, in terms of pain relief and functional improvement, are good. The limited life of the arthroplasty is problematic. By relieving pain, improvement of the range of motion and activity level very high patient satisfaction is usually achieved by hip arthroplasty in JIA patients. In the case of involvement of the contralateral hip or the ipsilateral knee joint it may be useful to perform a simultaneous, single-stage joint replacement of both joints.

Results of bilateral combined hip and knee arthroplasty in very young patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

We evaluated the long-term outcomes for combined, bilateral total knee and hip arthroplasty performed on a group of very young patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Six consecutive patients with a mean age of 14 years at the time of hip replacement and 16 years at knee replacement were analyzed. Five of the six patients were wheelchair dependent pre-operatively. All knee components had uncemented fixation, while the hip replacements were a mixed group of cemented and uncemented prostheses. Clinical and radiographic follow-up at a mean duration of 13.8 years for the hips and 17.3 years for the knees demonstrated four of the six patients were unlimited community ambulators, one a limited community ambulator and the remaining patient a household ambulator. Failure, defined as revision of any of the components or definite radiographic loosening, occurred in three knees (two patients) and five hips (three patients). These good long-term functional results in a relatively very young population indicate that an early and aggressive approach to multiple joint disease is an appropriate option at a young age for patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis with severe disability and pain refractory to conservative management.

Total hip replacements done without cement after acetabular fractures: A 4- to 8-year follow-up study

Twenty-one patients (21 hips) underwent cementless total hip replacement surgeries for previous acetabular fractures. The mean age at the time of hip replacement was 52 years (range, 23–78 years). The mean follow-up was 65 months (range, 48–104 months). One hip required revision of the stem secondary to a periprosthetic femur fracture from a fall at 3 months after surgery. Good to excellent clinical rating was achieved and maintained in 19 hips. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated stable cup and stem fixation in 17 and 15 hips. Only 1 patient with radiographic loosening of the components was sufficiently symptomatic. The results in this series appeared slightly better than those reported previously in hip replacements done with cement at comparable medium-term follow-up. The mechanical failure rates remained high in this patient population: 19% for the cups and 29% for the stems.