TightRope Group Research Articles

The TightRope study: a cadaveric, biomechanical comparison of generations of suspensory fixation with internal brace for Rockwood grade V acromioclavicular joint injuries

BackgroundSurgical treatment of Rockwood grade V AC joint injuries remains varied. We hypothesized that the addition of a second suspensory device between the clavicle and coracoid would yield superior biomechanical results over a single device. We also hypothesized that the addition of an internal brace across the AC joint to a suspensory device would yield superior results over the suspensory device in isolation. MethodsA total of 24 cadaveric shoulders were dissected and randomized to four groups with four different constructs implanted:Group A: Single AC TightRope (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) Group B: Double AC TightRope Group C: Single Knotless AC TightRope (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) Group D: Single Knotless AC TightRope with AC InternalBrace Ligament Augmentation (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA)These were then loaded in the Robotic arm (SIMVITRO) where 250 cycles of 50N of force in the superior plane was applied. Dynamic creep, displacement, translation and stiffness were assessed. ResultsTesting was successfully completed for all specimens. There were no failures due to fracture or translation of the clavicle greater than 5mm from the starting position. Reduction was maintained with a mean superior displacement of 1.7 mm (± 1.4 mm). The mean peak to peak displacement, superior and posterior translation, dynamic creep and stiffness did not differ significantly between construct groups. ConclusionThis study did not demonstrate any significant biomechanical differences between groups in terms of displacement, translation, creep or stiffness.

Comparaison d’une plaque à crochet seule, d’une plaque à crochet renforcée par une ancre de réinsertion et d’une suture par TightRope d’une luxation acromioclaviculaire aigüe de type IV

IntroductionThe best treatment for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unknown. HypothesisHook plate augmented with suture anchor (HA) may have different clinical and radiological results than hook plate alone (H), and arthroscopically assisted TightRope (TR) techniques in treating acute type V AC joint dislocations. Material and methodsThis retrospective study included 71 patients with acute type V AC joint dislocations between December 2010 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: H group (n=22), HA group (n=23) and TR group (n=26). We measured the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) differences and CCD ratio compared to uninjured side pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, at 3-month and 2-year after operation. Clinical outcomes were assessed as well at the same time points. Loss of correction was determined by the CCD difference and ratio between surgical and uninjured sides. ResultsThe mean age and follow-up period were 41.8±24.7 years and 30.2±4.3 months, respectively. No significant differences were found in the demographic data between the three groups. The HA group presented a trend of less overcorrection but without significance compared with the H group at immediately post-operation, 3-month, and 2-year follow-up. (CCD difference: –2.4mm vs. –3.7mm, –1.6mm vs. –1.8, and 0.2mm vs –1.9mm, CCD ratio: 67.7 % vs. 40.9 %, 79.3 % vs. 70.1 %, and 100.6 % vs. 86.5 %, respectively). The HA group also had significantly less loss of correction compared with the TR group at 3-month and 2-year after the operation (CCD difference: –1.6mm vs. 1.6mm, 0.2mm vs. 2.4mm; CCD ratio: 79.3 % vs. 122.2 %, 100.6 % vs. 136.1 %, all p<0.05). All three methods achieved significant improvement in function and pain without inter-group differences. No coracoid-related or tunnel complications occurred. DiscussionThe hook plate alone, and hook plate with suture anchor augmentation techniques provided less residual vertical instability compared to TightRope fixation at 2-year follow-up. The patient-reported functional outcomes were promising and comparable among the three groups. Level of evidenceIII, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes After TightRope Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

There is limited information regarding the long-term efficacy of techniques for surgical fixation after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. To evaluate the efficacy of hook plate (HP) and TightRope (TR) fixation for acute AC joint dislocations by comparing the long-term clinical and radiological patient outcomes. Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 61 patients with acute AC joint dislocation between July 2011 and November 2015. The patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: HP (n = 36) and TR (n = 25). Clinical outcomes at final follow-up were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score; the Korean Shoulder Score; and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Side-to-side coracoclavicular (CC) distance on radiographs, postoperative complications, and the rate of subacromial erosion in the HP group were also assessed between procedures. The mean follow-up period was 7.0 ± 1.0 years, and there were no significant differences in pain or outcome scores between the HP and TR groups (all P > .05). Forward flexion was better in the TR group (172.6° ± 5.6°) versus the HP group (166.0° ± 10.8°; P = .002). The percentages of patients with a difference in the side-to-side CC distance of <5 mm were 83.3% and 72.0% in the HP and TR groups, respectively (P = .288). Complications were found in 2 patients in the HP group and 1 in the TR group (P ≥ .999). Subacromial erosion was observed in 41.7% of patients after HP fixation, with no difference in VAS pain scores at the final follow-up in patients with versus without subacromial erosion (P = .719). When comparing HP with TR fixation for the treatment of acute AC joint dislocations, there were no significant differences in functional outcome scores, final CC distance, or complications. Slightly better forward flexion was seen after TR fixation. Subacromial erosion occurred in 40% of patients after HP fixation, but this did not affect long-term VAS pain scores. Both surgical techniques are effective treatment options for AC joint dislocation.

Comparison of hook plate alone, hook plate augmented with suture anchor, and arthroscopically-assisted tightrope fixation in the treatment of patients with acute type v acromioclavicular joint dislocations

IntroductionThe best treatment for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unknown. HypothesisHook plate augmented with suture anchor (HA) may have different clinical and radiological results than hook plate alone (H), and arthroscopically assisted TightRope (TR) techniques in treating acute type V AC joint dislocations. Material and methodsThis retrospective study included 71 patients with acute type V AC joint dislocations between December 2010 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: H group (n=22), HA group (n=23) and TR group (n=26). We measured the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) differences and CCD ratio compared to uninjured side pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, at 3-month and 2-year after operation. Clinical outcomes were assessed as well at the same time points. Loss of correction was determined by the CCD difference and ratio between surgical and uninjured sides. ResultsThe mean age and follow-up period were 41.8±24.7 years and 30.2±4.3 months, respectively. No significant differences were found in the demographic data between the three groups. The HA group presented a trend of less overcorrection but without significance compared with the H group at immediately post-operation, 3-month, and 2-year follow-up. (CCD difference: –2.4mm vs. –3.7mm, –1.6mm vs. –1.8, and 0.2mm vs –1.9mm, CCD ratio: 67.7% vs. 40.9%, 79.3% vs. 70.1%, and 100.6% vs. 86.5%, respectively). The HA group also had significantly less loss of correction compared with the TR group at 3-month and 2-year after the operation (CCD difference: –1.6mm vs. 1.6mm, 0.2mm vs. 2.4mm; CCD ratio: 79.3% vs. 122.2%, 100.6% vs. 136.1%, all p<0.05). All three methods achieved significant improvement in function and pain without inter-group differences. No coracoid-related or tunnel complications occurred. DiscussionThe hook plate alone, and hook plate with suture anchor augmentation techniques provided less residual vertical instability compared to TightRope fixation at 2-year follow-up. The patient-reported functional outcomes were promising and comparable among the three groups. Level of evidenceIII, Retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

A Novel Adjustable EndoButton Fixation Assisted by 3D Printing Technology for Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Biomechanical Study.

Purpose: The recommendations for surgical fixation of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries are increasingly challenging for many clinical orthopedists, as international consensus has not been published for the optimal treatment of the injury. Thus, we have created a 3D-printed navigation template for a precise bone tunnel and a novel adjustable EndoButton fixation (NAE) for the ideal treatment. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of the 3D-printed navigation template and explore the biomechanical performance of the NAE technique by comparing it with the intact syndesmosis, screw technique, and TightRope (TR) technique. Methods: Twenty-four human cadaveric legs were randomly allocated to four groups: the NAE group (n = 6), TR group (n = 6), screw group (n = 6), and intact group (n = 6). A personalized navigation template based on computed tomography scans was designed, and 3D printing models were generated for the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The NAE, TR, and screw group were performed via 3D-printed navigation template, respectively. All groups were tested under increasing loading forces including axial loading (from 100 N to 700 N) and torsional loading (from 1 N to 5 N), which were performed in different ankle positions. The displacements of the tibiofibular syndesmosis were analyzed using the Bose Electroforce 3510-AT biomechanical testing equipment. Results: Surgical fixations were conducted successfully through a 3D-printed navigation template. Both in axial or torsional loading experiments, no statistically significant difference was observed in the displacements among the NAE, TR, and intact groups in most situations (p > 0.05), whereas the screw group demonstrated obviously smaller displacements than the abovementioned three groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The 3D printing technology application may become beneficial and favorable for locating and making the bone tunnel. Also, the NAE fixation provides the performance of complete ligaments; it also restores physiologic micromotion and avoids insufficient or excessive reduction when compared to the TR and screw technique. This may offer a new fixation for the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries that is desirable for clinical promotion.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of acute Rookwood type IIIB acromioclavicular joint dislocation: Mini-open tightrope technique versus hook plate

ObjectiveTreatment of acute Rookwood type III AC joint dislocation is still controversially discussed. ISAKOS suggested to subdivide type III AC joint injuries into type IIIA (stable) and type IIIB (unstable). The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between hook plate fixation and mini-open tightrope for the treatment of acute Rookwood type IIIB acromioclavicular joint dislocation. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective clinical study of 112 patients with acute Rookwood type IIIB acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were treated surgically using either mini-open TightRope or hook plate from 2013 to 2019. All patients were followed up for 12 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Radiological results were assessed with the coracoclavicular distance (CCD), the change in clavicular elevation (ΔCE) and horizontal translation. ResultsThe length of incision was significantly shorter in the mini-open TightRope group than that in hook plate group (6.62±0.60 vs. 2.58±0.43 p <0.001). Duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the mini-open TightRope group than that in hook plate group (30.12±6.65 vs. 53.33±12.03; p < 0.001). Total blood loss volume was significantly less in the mini-open TightRope group than in the hook plate group. (23.85±7.88 vs. 70.67±24.62, p < 0.001). VAS and CMS in mini-open TightRope group were better than that in hook plate group at 2 weeks after surgery (VAS: 2.19±0.92 vs. 3.30±1.51, p = 0.002 and CMS 69.80±5.61 vs. 57.53±9.24, p<0.001) and 3 month after surgery (VAS: 1.19±0.48 vs. 3.07±1.36, p<0.001 and CMS 89.30±4.47 vs. 83.20±12.11, p = 0.205). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups at 12 months follow-up including VAS, CMS, the CC distance,ΔCE and the degree of dynamic horizontal translation. There were 2 complications in the hook plate group including 1cut out and 1 superficial wound infection. ConclusionThe mini-open tightrope has better function and relieves pain in the early postoperative period compared to hook plate, and at the last follow up two groups have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Mini-open TightRope fixation is a good option for the treatment of acute Rockwood types ⅢB AC joint dislocation.

Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation of Ankle Fractures: A Comparative Retrospective Review Over One Year

BackgroundSyndesmotic fixation is essential in the management of unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption. It can be achieved either by rigid fixation with screws or dynamic fixation with suture-button devices. Syndesmosis screws are considered the gold standard for the stabilisation and fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. We use both types of devices in our unit for the stabilisation of syndesmotic injuries. In our department, Arthrex TightRope® (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is the preferred suture-button device for the dynamic fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Some studies have reported better outcomes with the use of suture-button devices. In this study, we aim to compare the outcomes with the use of both these devices.MethodologyThis retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1 June 2019 until 31 May 2020 which included all patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation. Data were collected from the Northern Ireland Electronic Care Record and the Northern Ireland Picture Archiving and Communication System. Primary outcomes included reoperation rates due to failure of syndesmotic hardware. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of complications (e.g. infection, wound problems, or loss of reduction) radiographic fixation/stability, duration of follow-up, and significant ongoing symptoms at the time of discharge from the clinic.ResultsA total of 53 patients underwent syndesmotic stabilisation during this period. In total, 34 patients underwent fixation with TightRope and 19 underwent syndesmotic screw fixation. Three patients (9%) had reoperation due to any cause in the TightRope group compared to four patients (21%) in the syndesmotic screw group. All four patients in the syndesmotic screws group underwent implant removal due to failure or symptoms due to implant. Only one patient (3%) in the TightRope group underwent implant removal due to ongoing pain [the other two (6%) patients included one with lateral ankle abscess and one with long distal fibula screws, both unrelated to the use of TightRope and TightRope left in situ at reoperation]. Rediastasis was reported in one (5.2%) patient with syndesmotic screws. The median duration of follow-up was 82 days in the syndesmotic screw group compared to 77.5 days in the TightRope group.ConclusionsBased on our data, we report a lower incidence of implant-related problems and the need for implant removal with the use of TightRope. Quicker return to weight-bearing and slightly better radiographic stabilisation were noted as well. Our study has its limitations in terms of a small number of patients and the absence of functional outcomes as these were not routinely recorded at the time of discharge from the clinic.

Biomechanical comparison of screw, tightrope and novel double endobutton in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries

BackgroundAdequate reduction and stabilization of the syndesmosis are significant to prevent early degeneration of the ankle joint and get better clinical outcomes. However, the routine surgical methods have diffierent limitations. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel double Endobutton fixation to treat the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries, and determine whether the novel double Endobutton fixation demonstrates a better biomechanical property compare with the intact syndesmosis, the screw fixation and the Tightrope fixation. MethodsTwenty-four normal fresh-frozen ankle specimens with a mean age of 42 ± 8 (range, 28–62) years were randomly divided equally into four groups: (1) the intact group, (2) the screw group, (3) the Tightrope group, (4) the Endobutton group. 3D printer technology was used to establish the personalized distal tibiofibular syndesmotic navigation modules to determine the accurate bone tunnel. Axial loading was applied in five ankle positions: neutral position, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, varus and valgus. Rotation torque was applied in two ankle rotation of the neutral position: internal and external. ResultsIn most situations, the displacements of the intact group were larger than the screw group, the Tightrope group and the Endobutton group (P < .05), and the displacements of the screw group were smaller than other three groups (P < .05). The displacements of the double Endobutton group were slightly larger than the Tightrope group but no significant differences were found between these two groups except in the dorsiflexion position of axial loading experiments (P < .05). The novel double Endobutton fixation was steadier than intact syndesmosis and more micromotional than screw fixation. ConclusionOur study demonstrated that the novel double Endobutton can be considered as the better fixation in treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study

Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques.

Background:the optimal treatment of acute type III-V acromioclavicular (A-C) Rockwood dislocations is still a matter of discussion in orthopaedic surgery.Aim of the work:retrospective and comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic results of three different surgical techniques for stabilization of A-C joint using tension band wiring, hook plate and TightRope.Methods:a consecutive series of patients, treated from January 2014 and November 2019, were divided into three groups according to the surgical method used. They were clinically and radiographically assessed and the results were compared with those present in the literature.Results:66 patients, with a mean age of 44.7 years, were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 37.7 months (range 6-58 months). All patients, regardless of the group, had satisfactory outcome. According to the DASH score, statistically significant difference favours the TightRope Group (TRG) fixation (p<0.005). The TRG showed the highest mean Constant score (96,1); there are no significative differences between the clinical scores of Hook Plate Group (HPG) and Tension Band Wiring Group (TBWG). However, these two methods showed numerous complications, especially metal-work mobilization and stiffness respectively.Conclusions:good results can be overall achieved with primary fixation by the three different surgical methods under investigation. The TightRope system exhibited some advantages such as higher clinical scores, early recovery of range of movements, longitudinal surgical incision with non-keloid scar, no need for a second surgery and lower rate of complications.

Comparison of the effect of arthroscopy assisted TightRope plate and Triple-Endobutton plate and Double Endobutton plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation

To investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopic assisted TightRope plate, Triple-Endobutton plate and Double Endobutton plate in treating of Rockwood type Ⅲ-Ⅴ acromioclavicular dislocation. From January 2014 to January 2018, 128 patients with acromioclavicular dislocation were treated by operation. According to the operation plan, the patients were divided into three groups:Double Endobutton group, Triple-Endobutton group and TightRope group. All patients with acromioclavicular dislocation were operated by the same operation team, and the chief surgeon was the same chief physician. General baseline data such as gender, age, operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, VAS score of pain and Constant-Murley shoulder function score were recorded. The wound healed well and no recent complications occurred. One hundred and eleven patients were followed up for 6 to 12(9.1±3.1) months. There was no significant difference on general data among three groups (P >0.05). Among three groups, the operation time of Triple -Endobutton group was the longest, significantly higher than that of other two groups(P<0.05);the operation time of TightRope group was the shortest, significantly lower than that of other two groups (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, VAS score comparison of three groups, TightRope group was significantly lower than other two groups, with statistical difference (P<0.05). At 12 months after operation of three groups, the Constant-Murley score of TightRope group was significantly higher than that of two group (P<0.05). The incidence of incision infectionin TightRope group was significantly lower than that of other two groups(P<0.05); the incidence of reduction loss in Double Endobton group was significantly higher than that of other two groups(P<0.05), the incidence of reduction loss in TightRope group was significantly higher than that of Triple endobton group(P<0.05);the incidence of joint adhesion in TightRope group was significantly lower than that of other two groups(P<0.05). TightRope plate fixation with arthroscopy is more advantageous than Double Endobutton plate fixation and Triple-Endobutton plate fixation.

Novel Double Endobutton Technique Combined with Three-Dimensional Printing: A Biomechanical Study of Reconstruction in Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

ObjectiveTo reconstruct the acromioclavicular (AC) joint using an adjusted closed‐loop double Endobutton technique via a guiding locator that was applied using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology. At the same time, the reliability and safety of the novel double Endobutton (NDE) were tested by comparing the biomechanics of this technique with the TightRope (TR) approach.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted between January 2017 and January 2019. The Department of Anatomy at Southern Medical University obtained 18 fresh‐frozen specimens (8 left and 10 right; 12 men and 6 women). First, the guiding locators were applied using 3D printing technology. After preparation of materials, specimens were divided into an NDE group, a TR group, and a normal group. In the NDE and TR groups, the navigation module was used to locate and establish the bone tunnels; after that, the NDE or TR was implanted. However, the Endobuttons were fixed while pressing the distal clavicle downwards and the length of the loop could be adjusted by changing the upper Endobutton in the NDE group while the suture button construct was tensioned and knotted after pressing down the distal clavicle in the TR. Finally, load testing in anterior–posterior (AP), superior–inferior (SI), and medial–lateral (ML) directions as well as load‐to‐failure testing in the SI direction were undertaken to verify whether the NDE or TR had better biomechanics.ResultsIn the load testing, the displacements of the NDE and TR groups in the AP, SI, and ML direction were significantly shorter than those of the normal group (P < 0.05). In the load‐to‐failure testing, the ultimate load of the NDE and TR groups had significantly higher increases than the normal group (722.16 ± 92.04 vs 564.63 ± 63.05, P < 0.05; 680.20 ± 110.29 vs 564.63 ± 63.05, P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques for these two tests (P > 0.05). In the NDE group, four of six failures were a result of tunnel fractures of the coracoid, while two of six were due to suture breakage. In the TR, three failures were due to coracoid tunnel fractures, one was a result of a clavicle tunnel fracture, and the rest were due to suture breakage. In the normal group, half of the failures were a result of avulsion fractures of the conical ligament at the point of the coracoid process, and the other three were due to rupture of the conical ligament, fracture of the distal clavicle, and fracture of the scapular body.ConclusionAs for the TR technique, the stability and strength of the AC joint were better in patients who underwent reconstruction using the NDE technique than in the intact state.

Ankle joint contact loads and displacement in syndesmosis injuries repaired with Tightropes compared to screw fixation in a static model

BackgroundThe effect of syndesmotic fixation on restoration of pressure mechanics in the setting of a syndesmotic injury is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the contact mechanics of the tibiotalar joint following syndesmosis fixation with screws versus a flexible fixation device for complete syndesmotic injury. MethodsSix matched pairs of cadaveric below knee specimens were dissected and motion capture trackers were fixed to the tibia, fibula, and talus and a pressure sensor was placed in the tibiotalar joint. Each specimen was first tested intact with axial compressive load followed by external rotation while maintaining axial compression. Next, syndesmotic ligaments were sectioned and randomly assigned to repair with either two TightRopes® or two 3.5 mm cortical screws and the protocol was repeated. Mean contact pressure, peak pressure, reduction in contact area, translation of the center of pressure, and relative talar and fibular motion were calculated. Specimens were then cyclically loaded in external rotation and surviving specimens were loaded in external rotation to failure. ResultsNo differences in pressure measurements were observed between the intact and instrumented states during axial load. Mean contact presure relative to intact testing was increased in the screw group at 5 Nm and 7.5 Nm torque. Likewise, peak pressure was increased in the TightRope group at 7.5 Nm torque. There was no change in center of pressure in the TightRope group at any threshold; however, at every threshold tested there was significant medial and anterior translation in the screw group relative to the intact state. ConclusionEither screws or TightRope fixation is adequate with AL alone. With lower amounts of torque, the TightRope group appears to have contact and pressure mechanics that more closely match native mechanics.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes and Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fixed and Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension Devices

To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, including tunnel widening, and to evaluate graft status by second-look arthroscopy after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 2 different femoral cortical suspension devices (fixed and adjustable loop). Seventy-nine patients were included for this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, 41 patients of fixed loop group (EndoButton) and 38 patients of adjustable loop group (TightRope). The Tegner activity, Lysholm knee score, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test were compared between the 2 groups. Anterior stress radiographs and femoral tunnel widening on plain radiographs were also compared. Twenty-seven patients (66%) in the EndoButton group and 21 patients (55%) in the TightRope group underwent the second-look arthroscopy. At the final follow-up, the mean Tegner activity, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were improved in both groups and there were no statistically significant differences (5.1 ± 1.6 and 5.5 ± 2.1, P= .312; 90.4 ± 7.8 and 91.0 ± 6.5, P= .525; and 87.4 ± 6.7 and 88.7 ± 5.3, P= .127, respectively). There were no statistical significances in the both groups in terms of Lachman test and pivot-shift tests (P= .392, .559) as well as anterior stress radiographs (mean 3.2 ± 1.4mm and 2.9 ± 1.1mm, P= .343). Moreover, radiologic measurements comparing femoral tunnel widening at proximal and distal half also showed no significant differences (P= .540 and .412 on anteroposterior view; P= .254 and .437 on lateral view). In the second-look arthroscopy findings for graft tear and synovial coverage, there were no significant differences (P= .784 and .897). Both fixed loop and adjustable loop devices in ACL reconstruction provided good clinical and radiological outcomes. In patients with both devices, femoral tunnel widening at proximal and distal portion have no significant differences after ACL reconstruction. Moreover, second-look arthroscopy revealed no significant differences in terms of synovial coverage and rupture of the graft. Level II, prospective comparative study.

Acromioclavicular joint disruptions: A comparison of two surgical approaches 'hook' and 'rope'.

Acromioclavicular joint injuries are common shoulder girdle injuries most commonly resulting from a direct blow to the acromion with the arm adducted. Type-I or type-II acromioclavicular joint injuries can be managed with sling immobilization, early shoulder motion, and physiotherapy. The management of type-III injuries remains controversial and is individualized. Type IV and V injuries should be treated surgically. A myriad of surgical techniques for the management of acromioclavicular joint injuries have been reported. We present a comparative study of 76 patients treated with two most common modalities of treatment for AC joint disruption and that is Hook plate stabilisation (n=52) or arthroscopically assisted tight rope stabilisation (n=24). The primary objective was to establish whether hook plate stabilization was superior compared to arthroscopic tight rope fixation in reducing pain and increasing function in the short-term and long-term for patients with AC joint disruptions III-IV. We also wanted to assess how quickly patients returned to their work/job. It was a prospective study, we included all the patients operated between 2008 and 2015 for AC joint disruption by the two shoulder surgeons of our department. All patients followed a strict physiotherapy protocol and were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. We used the Harm and cost criteria of assessment and the patient specific functional outcome scores. Both modalities of treatment have high patient satisfaction rate, return to work is faster in tight rope group but after a year both group of patients returned to their premorbid state. Removal of hook plate is not mandatory and lysis of acromion is rare (1% in our series). Despite the fact that both methods yielded similar results and have statistically similar number of complications, the type of postoperative complications was different between groups. The plate group had more postoperative pain and worse function but both aspects improved after plate removal. The rope group had more complex complications including deep infection and recurrence of deformity and fracture. These differences should be taken into consideration when consenting the patient regarding possible treatment.

Comparative study on fixed versus adjustable-length loop device for femoral fixation of graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Aims and Objectives: Cortical suspension devices have been widely used in ACL reconstruction for femoral side graft fixation. Fixed-length and adjustable-length loop devices are two common suspensory loop devices that are used in ACL reconstruction. They both have their own biomechanical pros and cons. The purpose of this study is to determine the difference in functional outcome of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction using fixed length versus adjustable length loop in femoral fixation of quadrupled hamstring graft. Material and methods: It is a longitudinal prospective study conducted in Bone and Joint Centre, Kokilaben Dhirbhai Ambani Hospital (KDAH), Mumbai from Jan 2014 to June 2016. There were 60 patients enrolled in the study. The first 30 patients were treated with Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in the first 30 patients were done with quadrupled hamstring graft from ipsilateral limb fixed with Endobutton on femoral side and bio-absorbable intrafix tibial screw, similarly in subsequent 30 patients ACL reconstruction were done with quadrupled hamstring graft from ipsilateral limb fixed with Tightrope on femoral side and bio-absorbable intrafix tibial screw. Their clinical and functional status were assessed pre-operatively on the day prior to surgery and the last follow up at one following the surgery with Tegner-Lysholm Score and 2000 IKDC scores. Results: The average Tegner- Lysolm score before surgery in Endobutton group was 56.63±6.7 and post op score at last follow up was 93.97±4.1 and for Tightrope group it was 56.5±7.1 and 94.7±3.7 respectively. The average 2000 IKDC score before surgery in Endobutton group was 46.16±6.1and post-op score at last follow up was 82.52±4.2 and for Tightrope group it was 46.57±6.5 and 83.98±4.1 respectively. Two sample student t-test was conducted to compare the mean of post-operative Tegner-Lysolm score and 2000 IKDC for each group it showed P value for Tegner-Lysolm score to be 0.75 and that for 2000 IKDC score to be 0.7, which not statistically significant to reject the null hypothesis. Discussion and conclusion: Cortical suspension devices for femoral tunnel graft fixation are very efficient devices whether Fixed-length or adjustable length. Fixed-length and adjustable loop cortical suspension devices are equally effective in femoral fixation of graft in ACL reconstruction.

A double button adjustable loop device is biomechanically equivalent to tension band wire in the fixation of transverse patellar fractures—A cadaveric study

IntroductionTension-band wire fixation of patellar fractures is associated with significant hardware-related complications and infection. Braided polyester suture fixation is an alternative option. However, these suture fixations have higher failure rates due to the difficulty in achieving rigid suture knot fixation. The Arthrex syndesmotic TightRope, which is a double-button adjustable loop fixation device utilizing a 4-point locking system using FibreWire, may not only offer stiff rigid fixation using a knotless system, but may also obviate the need for implant removal due to hardware related problems. The aim of our study is to compare the fixation rigidity of patella fractures using Tightrope versus conventional tension-band wiring (TBW) in a cadaveric model. Materials and methodsTBW fixation was compared to TightRope fixation of transverse patella fractures in 5 matched pairs of cadaveric knees. The knees were cyclically brought through 0–90° of motion for a total of 500 cycles. Fracture gapping was measured before the start of the cycling, and at 50, 100, 200 and 500 cycles using an extensometer. The mean maximum fracture gapping was derived. Failure of the construct was defined as a displacement of more than 3mm, patella fracture or implant breakage. ResultsAll but one knee from each group survived 500 cycles. The two failures were due to a fracture gap of more than 3mm during cycling. There was no significant difference in the mean number of cycles tolerated. There was no implant breakage. There was no statistical significant difference in mean maximum fracture gap between the TBW and TightRope group at all cyclical milestones after 500 cycles (0.3026±0.4091mm vs 0.3558±0.7173mm, p=0.388). ConclusionsWe found no difference between the TBW and Tightrope fixation in terms of fracture gapping and failure. With possible lower risk of complications such as implant migration and soft tissue irritation, we believe tightrope fixation is a feasible alternative in fracture management of transverse patella fractures.

Biomechanical and Computed Tomography Analysis of Adjustable Femoral Cortical Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Cadaveric Human Knee Model

To evaluate and compare two adjustable femoral cortical suspensory fixation devices used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through a novel, direct computed tomography (CT) analysis metric and biomechanical laxity testing in a matched cadaveric human knee study. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with bovine tendon grafts were performed using two adjustable femoral cortical suspensory fixation devices (RigidLoop Adjustable [DePuy Synthes Mitek, Raynham, MA] and TightRope [Arthrex, Naples, FL]) in 12 knees (6 matched pairs). A mechanical testing series was used to determine each knee's laxity in the intact condition. After reconstruction, each specimen was again tested for laxity and also imaged with CT. The laxity testing and CT imaging were then repeated after 1,000 cycles of anteroposterior loading on each knee to compare changes in laxity for the two fixation devices and to visualize changes in button-to-graft distance migration through a three-dimensional CT imaging method. No significant differences were found between the two fixation groups' laxity measures after reconstruction (all P values ≥ .620) or after cycling (all P values ≥ .211) at any flexion angle. In addition, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding button-to-graft distance migration (P = .773; mean, 0.61 ± 0.6 mm [95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 1.3 mm] in RigidLoop Adjustable group and 0.53 ± 0.6 mm [95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 1.2 mm] in TightRope group). There were no significant differences between the two femoral cortical suspensory adjustable-loop devices regarding laxity outcomes or loop displacement as measured by button-to-graft distance migration. Use of either of the adjustable-loop cortical suspensory devices in our analysis would appear to produce similar, acceptable laxity outcomes and minimal effects in terms of device-related loop displacement.

Strength of Syndesmosis Fixation: Two TightRope versus One TightRope with Plate-and-Screw Construct.

Injuries involving the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis can lead to critical destabilization of the ankle mortise. Although specific indications for operative fixation remain unclear, accurate reduction of the syndesmosis has been correlated with the best functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maximum torque and rotation to failure after fixation with a novel construct. Seven pairs (14 ankles) of embalmed cadaveric lower legs, disarticulated at the knee, were obtained. Each pair was randomly assigned to receive either two TightRopes (Arthrex) or a plate-and-screw construct with one TightRope. All samples were mechanically tested in torsion to determine peak torque, torsional stiffness, and the maximum rotation angle at which failure occurred. Differences between the groups were compared using paired Student's t test. The maximum torque to failure after fixation was not significantly different between the two TightRopes (28.8 N*m; range, 7.3-49.7 N*m) and the one TightRope group (29.5 N*m; range, 9.2-44.9 N*m; p = 0.92). The maximum rotation to fracture after fixation was not significantly different between the two TightRopes (33.3 degrees; range, 21.6-57.0 degrees) and one TightRope group (38.6 degrees; range, 23.0-73.9 degrees). All specimens failed with the fracture of the fibula at the level of the inferior syndesmotic screw. The similar load to failure of the two TightRope and the one TightRope and plate-and-screw plate suggested similar stiffness between the two constructs. The addition of the plate may improve distribution of forces at the level of syndesmosis, reducing stress risers and decreasing the risk of failure, as demonstrated by a lower rotation to failure of the one TightRope with plate-and-screw construct. In addition, this construct is not likely to not be associated with any substantial cost increase. Further clinical studies may further elucidate the role of plate and/or TightRope augmentation to syndesmosis fixation.

Hook plate versus tightrope for acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation

Introduction The different surgical techniques described to treat type III acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation illustrate the fact that the ideal surgery remains controversial. This study aims at comparing two familiar different methods of stabilization of this injury. Patients and methods Between May 2013 and February 2015, 20 patients with acute Rockwood type III AC dislocation were divided into two groups, to compare the functional outcome after using either hook plate or tightrope stabilization. Patients were evaluated using the University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scoring System. Results Nine patients in the hook plate group were reoperated to remove the device, except one who refused to be reoperated. Only one patient in the tightrope group had revision because of rupture of the tightrope in the fourth week with successful and good outcome. The patients of the hook plate group showed significantly higher incidence of complication in comparison with the tightrope group (40 vs. 10%, respectively). Two (20%) cases in the hook plate group suffered from superficial infection and another two (20%) cases showed signs of osteolysis in 1-year follow-up plain radiographs. There was insignificant difference between both groups regarding severity of pain. The majority (70%) of the tightrope patients regained their normal functional activities, whereas only 40% of the hook plate patients did (P 0.05). Conclusion Open reduction and stabilization with either hook plate or tightrope in type III AC dislocations are effective techniques regarding the objective outcome scores, with no significant differences between the two groups. However, tightrope fixation provides a low rate of failure and complications and avoids the need for second surgery to remove the implant.

Clinical and radiological results after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using three different techniques. A retrospective study

the purpose of this retrospective study was to present the outcomes of three different techniques for the treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations: arthroscopic TightRope (TR), arthroscopic GraftRope (GR), and open reconstruction of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligament using the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS). eighteen patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluations after a mean follow-up time of 43 months. The following clinical outcome measures were considered: the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH), the Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), and the Constant score (CS). On X-rays, the CC distance was measured. the median DASH score at follow-up was 12.5 in the TR group, 5 in the GR group, and 4.2 in the LARS group. The median NCS value was 88 in the TR group, 88 in the GR group, and 91 in the LARS group. The median CS was 100 in the TR group, 95 in the GR group, and 94.5 in the LARS group. The mean CC distance was 10.3 mm in the TR group, 13.8 in the GR group, and 16.6 in the LARS group. all three techniques proved to be reliable in providing good clinical outcomes, although none of the studied techniques demonstrated reliability in maintaining anatomical reduction after surgery. Level III, retrospective comparative study.