Thymoglobulin Group Research Articles

Effect of Different Induction Immunosuppression on the Incidence of Infectious Complications after Kidney Transplantation-Single Center Study.

Background/Objectives: Potent immunosuppression lowers the incidence of acute graft rejection but increases the risk of infections. In order to decrease either infectious complications or acute rejection, it is necessary to identify risk groups of patients profiting from personalized induction immunosuppressive treatment. The aim of our analysis was to find whether there were higher incidences of infectious complications after kidney transplantation (KT) in groups with different induction immunosuppressive treatment and also to find independent risk factors for recurrent infections. Materials: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with induction treatment with basiliximab after kidney transplantation from 2014 to 2019 at our center relative to age- and sex-matched controls of patients with thymoglobulin induction immunosuppression. Results: Our study consisted of two groups: basiliximab (39) and thymoglobulin (39). In the thymoglobulin group we observed an increased incidence of recurrent infection in every observed interval; however, acute rejection was seen more often in the basiliximab group. A history of respiratory diseases and thrombocytopenia were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent bacterial infections from the first to sixth month after KT. Decreased eGFR from the first month, infections caused by multi-drug-resistant bacteria, and severe infections (reflected by the need for hospitalization) were identified as independent risk factors for recurrent bacterial infections from the first to the twelfth month after KT. Conclusions: We found that in the group of patients with thymoglobulin induction immunosuppressive treatment, infectious complications occurred significantly more often during the entire monitored period with decreased incidence of acute humoral and cellular rejection occurred more often.

Role of Induction in a Haplomatch, Related, Low-Risk, Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation with Triple Drug Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Study.

The role of induction in low-risk, living-donor kidney transplants being treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone is debatable. This was a retrospective study that consisted of patients undergoing living kidney transplantation between February 2010 and June 2021 with a related haplomatch donor, with maintenance immunosuppression of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. High-risk transplants, such as second or more transplants, immunologically incompatible transplants, and steroid-free transplants, were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups: no induction, basiliximab induction, and thymoglobulin induction, and the outcomes of all three were compared. A total of 350 transplants were performed. There was a significant difference in the recipient sex distribution (P = 0.0373) and the number of preemptive transplants (P = 0.0272) between the groups. Other parameters were comparable. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was significantly less frequent in the thymoglobulin group than in the no-induction (5.3% vs. 17.5%; P = 0.0051) or basiliximab (5.3% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.0054) group. This persisted even after we performed multivariate regression analysis (thymoglobulin vs. no-induction group, P = 0.0146; thymoglobulin vs. basiliximab group, P = 0.0237). There was no difference in BPAR between the basiliximab and no-induction groups. There were no differences in other outcomes between the groups. In a low-risk haplomatch, related, living-donor kidney transplant on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone, BPAR was significantly lower with thymoglobulin as opposed to no induction or basiliximab induction with a similar short-term patient and death-censored graft survival and infection rates. Basiliximab did not provide any benefit over no induction.

Induction Versus Maintenance Immunosuppression After Intestinal Transplant: Determining Which Treatment Most Impacts Long-Term Patient And Graft Survival.

Immunosuppressive strategies for intestinal transplant have changed over time. However, specific intestinal transplant-oriented protocols and reports on long-term maintenance regimens are scarce. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of 2 different initial immunosuppressive protocols based on thymoglobulin (group A) and basiliximab (anti-interleukin 2 antibody) (group B) and of changes to maintenance immunosuppression over long-term follow-up in intestinal transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively established protocol for intestinal transplant immunosuppression, conducted between May 2006 and December 2020. We analyzed 51 intestinal transplant recipients, with 6 patients excluded because of early death or graft loss. Acute cellular rejection frequency and grade, number of acute cellular rejection episodes, time to the first acute cellular rejection episode, response to treatment, number of patients who progressed to chronic allograft rejection, kidney function, infections, incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and graft-versus-host disease, and patient and graft survival were analyzed. In the study groups, there were 87 acute cellular rejection episodes in 45 patients (33 in group A and 54 in group B). We found degree of acute cellular rejection to be mild in 45 patients, moderate in 18, and severe in 24 (not significant between groups). Our comparison of induction therapy (thymoglobulin [group A] vs interleukin 2 antibody [group B]) did not show any statistical difference during clinical followup. Long-term review showed that all patients were on tacrolimus. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 62% and 45% for group A and 54% and 46% for group B, respectively (not significant). Long-term patient and graft outcomes reflected the use of an individualized follow-up with adjustments and changes in immunosuppressive medications according to the patient's clinical course and complications rather than based on the induction immunosuppressive protocol used.

Comparison of Thymoglobulin and Grafalon as Induction Agents in Renal Transplantation: A Prospective Study

BackgroundInduction immunosuppression is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and prevent delayed graft function. The 2 rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins- thymoglobulin and Grafalon (ATG Fresenius) have been commonly used for induction immunosuppression and treatment of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. There are very few studies comparing the efficacy and side effects of both the anti-thymocyte globulins therefore this prospective study comparing the 2 types of anti-thymocyte globulins would be of clinical interest. Patients and MethodsThis prospective single center study was conducted at Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, India from April 2019 to June 2020. Sixty-two ABO-compatible renal transplant recipients were included in the study. They were divided in 2 groups of 31 patients each. One group received thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) and the second group received Grafalon (6 mg/kg). All patients were followed up for 12 months and the 2 groups were compared for incidence of rejections, infections, graft function, patient survival, and graft survival. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the incidence of rejections, infective episodes, graft function, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival and patient survival in thymoglobulin or Grafalon groups. The hematological parameters were similar in both groups at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months of follow-up. The absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in the thymoglobulin group at 12 months posttransplant. ConclusionsThymoglobulin and Grafalon were found to be equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy in short term, with no difference in rejections, infections, graft survival, or patient survival.

Could thymoglobulin increase hemorrhagic risk in the perioperative transplantation period of sensitized kidney recipients?

ObjectiveIt has been described that thymoglobulin could increase the risk of infections and malignancies, in comparison to basiliximab. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia are also more common within the first days after transplantation among thymoglobulin patients. Our objective was to analyze bleeding complications in this subset of patients. Material and methodsBleeding complications were evaluated among 515 renal transplants carried out at our institution between 2012 and 2018. We compared patients treated with thymoglobulin (Group 1, N=91) with those treated with basiliximab (Group 2, N=424). ResultsWe found differences in platelet decrease: 95,142.2 (55,339.6) in Group 1 and 52,364.3 (69,116.6) in Group 2 (P=0.001), number of patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<75,000/mm3) (20.8% vs. 3.7%, P=0.001), number of blood units transfused (3.25 (0.572) vs. 2.2 (0.191, P=0.028) and percentage of patients that required surgery due to bleeding (18.2% vs. 7.7%, P=0.046). In a multiple lineal regression multivariable analysis (dependent variable was number of blood units transfused), only age [OR 0.037, 95% CI (0.003–0.070)] and type of immunosuppression [OR 1.592, 95% CI (1.38–2.84)] showed statistical significance. ConclusionsThe use of thymoglobulin in the perioperative transplantation period could increase bleeding complications. In our series, in the group of patients with thymoglobulin, severe thrombocytopenia was 6 times more frequent, and active bleeding that required surgery was also 2.5 times more frequent. One way to continue with the use of this immunosuppression agent, might be to adjust the dose instead of discontinuing it. The use of thymoglobulin should be a factor to consider in the postoperative period of these patients.

Inducción con timoglobulina: ¿incrementa el riesgo hemorrágico en receptores renales sensibilizados?

ObjectiveIt has been described that thymoglobulin could increase the risk of infections and malignancies, in comparison to basiliximab. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia are also more common within the first days after transplantation among thymoglobulin patients. Our objective was to analyze bleeding complications in this subset of patients. Material and methodsBleeding complications were evaluated among 515 renal transplants carried out at our institution between 2012 and 2018. We compared patients treated with thymoglobulin (Group 1, N=91) with those treated with basiliximab (Group 2, N=424). ResultsWe found differences in platelet decrease:95142.2 (55,339.6) in Group 1 and 52,364.3 (69,116.6) in Group 2 (P=.001), number of patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<75,000/mm3) (20.8% vs. 3.7%, P=.001), number of blood units transfused (3.25 (0.572) vs. 2.2 (0.191, P=.028) and percentage of patients that required surgery due to bleeding (18.2% vs. 7.7%, P=.046). In a multiple lineal regression multivariable analysis (dependent variable was number of blood units transfused), only age [OR 0.037, 95% CI (0.003-0.070)] and type of immunosuppression [OR 1.592, 95% CI (1.38-2.84)] showed statistical significance. ConclusionsThe use of thymoglobulin in the perioperative transplantation period could increase bleeding complications. In our series, in the group of patients with thymoglobulin, severe thrombocytopenia was 6 times more frequent, and active bleeding that required surgery was also 2.5 times more frequent. One way to continue with the use of this immunosuppression agent, might be to adjust the dose instead of discontinuing it. The use of thymoglobulin should be a factor to consider in the postoperative period of these patients.

The Effects of Different Induction Regimes on Serial Lymphocyte Subsets in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single Tertiary Center Experience

Immunosuppressive therapy is the backbone of kidney transplantation in preventing acute rejection. T-cell depletion after doses of thymoglobulin is dose-dependent, as are their side effects. At the same time, basiliximab and other maintenance immunosuppressive drugs act at different signals on T lymphocytes. Therefore, studying the pattern of lymphocyte subset depletion depending on the induction regime given at transplantation could be an added tool in managing post-transplant recipients. This prospective observational study recruited kidney transplant recipients from August 2019 through April 2021 at the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Blood tests for lymphocyte subsets were taken at pre-transplant, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-transplantation. At transplantation, recipients received either basiliximab, low-dose thymoglobulin (cumulative dose: 1.5 mg/kg), or standard-dose thymoglobulin (cumulative dose: 5 mg/kg). A total of 39 patients were recruited: 38.5% received basiliximab (15 of 39), 15.4% received low-dose thymoglobulin (6 of 39), and 46.2% received standard-dose thymoglobulin (18 of 39). Absolute lymphocyte counts 1 week post-transplantation were 1.5 ± 0.84×109/L for basiliximab, 0.7 ± 0.57×109/L for low-dose thymoglobulin, and 0.1 ± 0.08×109/L for standard-dose thymoglobulin (P < .001). The CD4+ and CD8+ counts were severely depleted in the standard-dose thymoglobulin group, with a statistically significant differenceup to 6 months post-transplantation. In the low-dose thymoglobulin group, the CD4+ and CD8+ counts were depleted at 1 week post-transplantation and recovered at 1 month post-transplantation. There was no difference in allograft function and incidence of allograft rejection across groups. The effects on lymphocyte counts, CD4+ and CD8+, vary depending on the type and dose of induction immunosuppression. This could be a guiding tool in managing immunosuppression post-transplantation depending on the patient's immunologic risk.

Thymoglobulin Versus Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Circulatory Death

IntroductionThe Campath, Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduction, and Chronic allograft nephropathy (3C), a study comparing alemtuzumab versus basiliximab induction immunosuppression in kidney transplants, has found lower acute rejection rate with alemtuzumab but same graft survival. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of induction immunosuppression (thymoglobulin, alemtuzumab, basiliximab) on the outcome of kidneys of donors after circulatory death (DCD).MethodsData of the 274 DCD patients of the 3C obtained from the sponsor were compounded with the 140 DCD patients who received thymoglobulin in a single center with the same entry criteria as the 3C, giving 414 patients on 3 induction regimes.ResultsThere were more male donors (P < 0.05) and human leukocyte antigen and DR mismatched patients in the thymoglobulin group (P < 0.001). Death-censored graft survival at 6 months was 98.6% in the thymoglobulin, 95.5% in the alemtuzumab (P = 0.08), and 95.7% in the basiliximab group (P = 0.09) and at 2 years 97.9% versus 94.8% (P = 0.13, hazard ratio [HR] 2.8, 95% CI 0.7–10.9) versus 94.3% (P = 0.06, HR 3.5, 95% CI 0.9–13.6), respectively.The 2-year overall graft survival was 95% in the thymoglobulin versus 88% in the alemtuzumab (unadjusted P = 0.038, adjusted HR 2.4, 95% CI 0.99–5.9) and 91.4% in the basiliximab group (P = 0.21). The 2-year patient survival was numerically less in the alemtuzumab compared with the thymoglobulin group (91.8% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.052, HR 2.90, 95% CI 0.93–9.2). Acute rejection was 17% in the basiliximab, 4.3% in the thymoglobulin, and 6% in the alemtuzumab group (P < 0.001).ConclusionIn DCD transplants, thymoglobulin induction may provide advantage over alemtuzumab in patient survival and the same advantage as alemtuzumab over basiliximab in terms of acute rejection. Differing maintenance immunosuppression may contribute to the difference found.

Induction Immunosuppressive Therapy for Kidney Transplant in Elderly Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

The number of elderly kidney transplant recipients is increasing, and age-tailored induction immunosuppression regimens are needed. We compared safety and efficacy of basiliximab versus thymoglobulin at various dosages. Of 590 kidney transplants at our center from 2012 to 2019, 119 (20.1%) were for recipients over 65 years of age; 118 patients received deceased donor kidneys, and 1 received a related living donor kidney. We retrospectively reviewed medical records for demographics, baseline characteristics, donor characteristics, induction regimens, infectious complications, graft function, and patient survival. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 induction immunosuppression groups: basiliximab (n = 15, 12.6%), 3 mg/kg thymoglobulin (n = 8, 6.7%), 4.5 mg/kg thymoglobulin (n = 67, 56.3%), and 6 mg/kg thymoglobulin (n = 29, 24.4%). All patients received pulse doses of methylprednisolone followed by a prednisone taper. Other maintenance immunosuppression agents included tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Recipients in the basiliximab and 3 mg/kg thymoglobulin groups were older (median age ⟩70 years; P ⟨ .001). The 4.5 and 6 mg/kg thymoglobulin groups had higher proportions of African American patients and patients with calculated panel reactive antibody over 20%. There were significantly fewer infectious complications in the basiliximab and 3 mg/kg thymoglobulin groups. Despite differences in biopsy-proven acute rejection rates, estimated glomerular filtration rate and graft and patient survival rates at 1 year were similar across groups. All patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection were African American patients. Kidney transplant in patients ≥65 years is safe and feasible. Changes in this unique population's immune system warrant age-tailored regimens. We found that patients at low immunologic risk would benefit from basiliximab orthymoglobulin at 3 mg/kg. Regardless of calculated panel reactive antibodies, African American patients should be considered as high immunologic risk group forrejection, and higher thymoglobulin dosing should be considered.

Effectiveness of Thymoglobulin Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplant From Deceased Donor With Mild to Moderate Acute Kidney Injury

BackgroundThe clinical benefit of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) compared with basiliximab for induction therapy in kidney transplant (KT) resulting from acute kidney injury (AKI) donors remains controversial. In cases of severe AKI, the degree of kidney injury is too great to reveal influence of different induction therapies on clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of Thymoglobulin and basiliximab induction therapy in KTs from deceased donors (DDs) with mild to moderate AKI. MethodsWe retrospectively studied 147 patients who received KTs from DDs between 2009 and 2017 in our center; 91 patients received kidneys from AKI donors. The AKI severity was classified based on the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) staging, and patients with AKIN stage 3 (43 patients) were excluded. Clinical outcomes were compared according to the type of induction therapy. ResultsThymoglobulin and basiliximab induction groups showed no significant differences in demographic and baseline characteristics except donor age and follow-up period. The Thymoglobulin group had lower incidences of acute rejection and a trend toward a lower incidence of delayed graft function and better graft survival than the basiliximab group. There was no significant difference in BK infection rate; however, cytomegalovirus infection rate showed a trend toward a lower incidence in the basiliximab group. ConclusionsIn cases of KT from AKIN stage 1 and 2 donors, Thymoglobulin showed better clinical outcomes than basiliximab, although it had a somewhat high rate of cytomegalovirus infection. It seems beneficial to use Thymoglobulin induction therapy in KTs from DDs with mild to moderate AKI.

Comparison of clinical outcome of induction immunosuppressive therapy with thymoglobulin and standard therapy in kidney transplantation; a randomized double-blind clinical trial

Introduction: Thymoglobulin is a lymphocyte-depleting polyclonal antibody, administered for induction therapy at the time of kidney transplantation to reduce the risk of acute allograft rejection. The appropriate dosage and duration of therapy is controversial. The higher dosages are associated with infection and malignancy. Objectives: In this study efficacy and safety of lower dosage (in comparison with previous studies) of thymoglobulin in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated. Patients and Methods: In this clinical trial, 106 adult kidney transplant recipients, were randomized before transplantation in two groups (case and control). The case group (53 patients) were received induction therapy with thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/d for 3 days) and the control group (53 patients) were received non-induction regiment. Delayed graft function (DGF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), acute allograft rejection and thymoglobulin complications were evaluated during the first post-transplantation year. Results: Around 106 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled (71 or 66.98% deceased donor) to the study. No significant statistical differences were found in GFR at the time of discharge from hospital (P=0.399) and at 1 year (P=0.851) and acute allograft rejection (P= 0.304) between two groups. Graft survival (73.5% in case group versus 81.1% in control group, P=0.392) at month 12th was similar among groups. Additionally, no significant differences of acute allograft rejection in recipient from deceased or living donor between two groups were detected. There was a higher incidence of DGF in the control group (26.4%) than the thymoglobulin group (5.8%) and the difference was statistically significant (P= 0.004). Thrombocytopenia (17% versus 49.1%, P&lt;0.001) and leukopenia (11.3% versus 50.9%, P&lt;0.001) were also significantly higher in the case group. Conclusion: While the incidence of DGF was reduced in thymoglobulin group, the short-term acute allograft rejection rate was not reduced compared to the control group. However, our results require further consideration with larger samples

Thymoglobulin Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Low-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundThe Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend that T-cell–depleting agents should be used only for kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high immunologic risk. However, the effects of thymoglobulin induction therapy in low–immunologic risk KT recipients on tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and steroid have not been elucidated yet. MethodsWe retrospectively collected 6 months postoperative clinical data, for low–immunologic risk KT recipients at Soonchunhyang University Hospital. Recipients were divided into thymoglobulin and basiliximab groups, based on the induction agent used. Low–immunologic risk recipients were defined as those with panel-reactive antibody level <30% at the time of kidney transplantation. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection and borderline change was compared between the two groups. ResultsOf the 46 low–immunologic risk patients, 25 received thymoglobulin. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 0% (n = 0) and that of borderline change was 8% (n = 2) in the thymoglobulin group. The basiliximab group had a significantly higher incidence of rejection (23.8%; n = 5; P = .015) and borderline change (42.9%; n = 9; P = .006). No significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate was found between the two groups at 6 months after kidney transplantation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurred more frequently in the thymoglobulin group than in the basiliximab group. All patients with CMV infection in both groups were effectively treated with pre-emptive intravenous ganciclovir therapy. ConclusionsIn low–immunologic risk KT recipients who received tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and steroid therapy, thymoglobulin induction therapy significantly reduced the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection and borderline change compared with basiliximab induction therapy.

Depleting Antibody Induction and Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Paired Kidney Analysis.

Induction immunosuppression decreases the risk for acute rejection and improves graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We aimed to compare the outcomes of induction with Thymoglobulin and alemtuzumab in KTRs through paired-kidney analysis. Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2003 to 2013, we identified recipients of deceased donor kidneys from the same donor in such a way that 1 patient received Thymoglobulin induction and recipient of the mate kidney underwent alemtuzumab induction. All patients were discharged on maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with/without steroids. Outcomes were compared between the groups in an adjusted model. Study cohort included 1149 patients each in alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin groups. Incidence of delayed graft function (25.8% vs 28.6%, P = 0.12), and 1-year rejection (5.7% vs 4.5%, P = 0.97) were similar for alemtuzumab versus Thymoglobulin groups. Adjusted overall graft (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.48; P = 0.52) and patient (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.05) survivals were also similar for alemtuzumab versus Thymoglobulin groups. Median hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in alemtuzumab group (4 days vs 5 days, P < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in a subgroup of high immune risk patients. There was evidence for clustering of alemtuzumab use within transplant centers which did not impact long-term outcomes. Depleting antibody induction therapy with alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin appear equally effective in deceased donor KTRs maintained on tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen along with steroid. Alemtuzumab induction is beneficial in reducing hospital length of stay.

A study on impact of renal status in the outcome of patients undergoing non-renal solid organ transplant at a tertiary care centre in Kerala

Induction immunosuppression is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and prevent delayed graft function. The 2 rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins- thymoglobulin and Grafalon (ATG Fresenius) have been commonly used for induction immunosuppression and treatment of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. There are very few studies comparing the efficacy and side effects of both the anti-thymocyte globulins therefore this prospective study comparing the 2 types of anti-thymocyte globulins would be of clinical interest.This prospective single center study was conducted at Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, India from April 2019 to June 2020. Sixty-two ABO-compatible renal transplant recipients were included in the study. They were divided in 2 groups of 31 patients each. One group received thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) and the second group received Grafalon (6 mg/kg). All patients were followed up for 12 months and the 2 groups were compared for incidence of rejections, infections, graft function, patient survival, and graft survival.There was no significant difference in the incidence of rejections, infective episodes, graft function, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival and patient survival in thymoglobulin or Grafalon groups. The hematological parameters were similar in both groups at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months of follow-up. The absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in the thymoglobulin group at 12 months posttransplant.Thymoglobulin and Grafalon were found to be equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy in short term, with no difference in rejections, infections, graft survival, or patient survival.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation: A single centre experience

Induction immunosuppression is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and prevent delayed graft function. The 2 rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins- thymoglobulin and Grafalon (ATG Fresenius) have been commonly used for induction immunosuppression and treatment of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. There are very few studies comparing the efficacy and side effects of both the anti-thymocyte globulins therefore this prospective study comparing the 2 types of anti-thymocyte globulins would be of clinical interest.This prospective single center study was conducted at Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, India from April 2019 to June 2020. Sixty-two ABO-compatible renal transplant recipients were included in the study. They were divided in 2 groups of 31 patients each. One group received thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) and the second group received Grafalon (6 mg/kg). All patients were followed up for 12 months and the 2 groups were compared for incidence of rejections, infections, graft function, patient survival, and graft survival.There was no significant difference in the incidence of rejections, infective episodes, graft function, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival and patient survival in thymoglobulin or Grafalon groups. The hematological parameters were similar in both groups at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months of follow-up. The absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in the thymoglobulin group at 12 months posttransplant.Thymoglobulin and Grafalon were found to be equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy in short term, with no difference in rejections, infections, graft survival, or patient survival.

Comparison of combination of rituximab with low dose thymoglobulin versus low dose thymoglobulin alone as induction agent in renal transplantation

Induction immunosuppression is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and prevent delayed graft function. The 2 rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins- thymoglobulin and Grafalon (ATG Fresenius) have been commonly used for induction immunosuppression and treatment of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. There are very few studies comparing the efficacy and side effects of both the anti-thymocyte globulins therefore this prospective study comparing the 2 types of anti-thymocyte globulins would be of clinical interest.This prospective single center study was conducted at Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, India from April 2019 to June 2020. Sixty-two ABO-compatible renal transplant recipients were included in the study. They were divided in 2 groups of 31 patients each. One group received thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) and the second group received Grafalon (6 mg/kg). All patients were followed up for 12 months and the 2 groups were compared for incidence of rejections, infections, graft function, patient survival, and graft survival.There was no significant difference in the incidence of rejections, infective episodes, graft function, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival and patient survival in thymoglobulin or Grafalon groups. The hematological parameters were similar in both groups at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months of follow-up. The absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in the thymoglobulin group at 12 months posttransplant.Thymoglobulin and Grafalon were found to be equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy in short term, with no difference in rejections, infections, graft survival, or patient survival.

Optimal Dose of Thymoglobulin for Induction Therapy in High Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: Thymoglobulin has been used for induction therapy to prevent acute rejection and delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant patients. However, the usual dose of thymoglobulin is considered to be related with frequent infection. We compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose thymoglobulin to high-dose treatment in high risk recipients with kidney transplantation. Methods: Twenty-one kidney transplant recipients underwent induction treatment with thymoglobulin and were divided into two groups: patients treated with low-dose (＜6.0 mg/kg) and high-dose thymoglobulin (≥6.0 mg/kg). All patients showed one or more risk factors for acute rejection or DGF. The risk factors were re-transplantation, recipient or donor age over 60 years, human leukocyte antigen full mismatch, and panel-reactive antibody more than 50%. We compared incidence of acute rejection, infection, hematologic complications, and graft survival between two groups. Results: The demographic characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Mean follow-up duration was 11.9±4.3 months, and cumulative thymoglobulin dosage was 6.3±1.6 mg/kg. The incidence rates of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), DGF and infectious events as cytomegalovirus disease, or urinary tract infection were not significantly different between the two groups. Neutropenia occurred more frequently in the high-dose thymoglobulin group, but there was no statistically significant difference. The rate of graft loss were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: There were no differences in graft survival, infectious disease, and hematologic problems between the two groups. We suggest to lower the dose of thymoglobulin to less than 6 mg/kg for prevent acute AMR and DGF in high risk patients.

Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies.

Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We reviewed 30 alloHSCT for hematologic malignancies performed between 2007 and 2010 with fludarabine and i.v. busulfan as conditioning regimen. Patients alternatingly received Thymoglobulin or ATG-F. Median followup was 3.3 (2.5–4.5) years. Adverse events appeared to occur more frequently during Thymoglobulin infusion than during ATG-F infusion but without statistical significance (P = 0.14). There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence, and transplant related mortality (TRM) in the Thymoglobulin versus ATG-F group: 45.7% versus 46.7%, 40% versus 33.7%, 40% versus 33.3%, and 20% versus 33.3%. The same held for graft failure, rejection, infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and acute or chronic GvHD. In patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies after RIC, the use of Thymoglobulin is comparable to that of ATG-F in all the aspects evaluated in the study. However due to the small number of patients in each group we cannot exclude a possible difference that may exist.

Cancer-Free Survival Following Alemtuzumab Induction in Heart Transplantation

BackgroundThe malignancy rate after alemtuzumab (C-1H) induction in cardiac transplantation is unknown. MethodsA retrospective analysis from a single center for all patients that underwent cardiac transplantation from January 2000 to January 2011 and that had no history of malignancy before transplantation was performed. Patients induced with alemtuzumab were compared with a group of patients receiving thymoglobulin or no induction and assessed for 4-year cancer-free post–heart transplantation survival. ResultsOf 402 patients included, 185 (46.0%) received alemtuzumab, 56 (13.9%) thymoglobulin, and 161 (40.0%) no induction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups: mean age 54.0 years, male 77.1%, white 88.6%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49.0%. The calcineurin inhibitor was tacrolimus in 98.9% of alemtuzumab patients, 98.2% of thymoglobulin patients, and 87.0% of the noninduced (P < .001). The secondary agent was mycophenolate mofetil in all but 16 noninduced patients (9.9%), who received azathioprine. The 4-year cancer-free survival did not differ between groups: 88.1% alemtuzumab, 87.5% thymoglobulin, 88.2% noninduction; P = .088. The 4-year nonskin cancer–free survival was 96.8% for the alemtuzumab group, 96.4% for the thymoglobulin group, and 95.7% for the noninduced; P = .899. ConclusionsNeither the 4-year cancer-free survival nor the 4-year nonskin cancer–free survival differed between the alemtuzumab, thymoglobulin, and noninduced groups.

Recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis in pediatric liver transplant recipients

There is little detailed clinical information on recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (rPSC) after liver transplantation in children. Our purpose was to describe the characteristics of children who had experienced rPSC after liver transplantation so that we could identify potential risk factors for recurrence. Clinical information for pediatric patients undergoing transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was retrospectively reviewed, and variables related to the pretransplant diagnosis of PSC and posttransplant variables were abstracted. The studied variables included the following: cytomegalovirus/Epstein-Barr virus status, early/late rejection, induction regimen, immunosuppression in the first year, steroid-resistant rejection, diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, and human leukocyte antigen markers commonly associated with PSC. A diagnosis of rPSC was made on the basis of radiographic features, histology, or both. Twelve patients underwent liver transplantation for PSC between 1993 and 2012. Patients received tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression after induction with steroids (n = 6) or thymoglobulin (n = 6). Three patients were diagnosed with rPSC 44, 60, and 62 months after transplantation. A fourth patient underwent retransplantation for graft failure with features of both hepatic artery stenosis and rPSC. This patient had distinct histological features of rPSC in the second graft. Three of the 4 patients were 7 years old or younger at the diagnosis of PSC. The patient and graft survival rates were similar for the steroid and thymoglobulin groups. All 4 children with rPSC received steroid-free thymoglobulin induction. In conclusion, our observation of an association between thymoglobulin, and age less than 10 years at the diagnosis of PSC, and rPSC adds to the existing suggestion of a link between the immune environment and the pathogenesis of rPSC. Defining the natural history of rPSC and searching for the etiology and risk factors of rPSC are important for the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients.