Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis Research Articles

Surgeon preferences in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis.

Primary thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis is one of the most common conditions encountered by hand surgeons. Of the vast number of operations that have been proposed, none have demonstrated results significantly superior to trapeziectomy alone. The purpose of our study was to determine why surgeons opt for their technique in treating CMC arthritis. A cross-sectional survey of active members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was conducted to evaluate the reasons behind their preferred technique in the treatment of isolated thumb CMC arthritis. Surgeons were contacted by e-mail once and provided with a link to a de-identified survey consisting of 5 treatment questions and 5 demographic questions. Of 950 responses were received. 40.5% of surgeons preferred trapeziectomy + ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI), followed by trapeziectomy + suspensionplasty (28.2%), suture button suspension (5.9 %), trapeziectomy alone (4.6%), prosthetic arthroplasty (3.2%), arthrodesis (1.1%), and other (6.6%). Proponents of trapeziectomy + LRTI cited familiarity (73.2%), exposure during fellowship (48.8%) and less proximal migration (60%) to be the main reasons affecting their decision. Surgeons who preferred trapeziectomy + suspensionplasty most reported simplicity (74.9%), fewer complications (45.3%), less proximal migration (43.8%), and avoidance of autogenous tissue harvest (42.7%). Advocates of suture button suspension cited avoidance of autogenous tissue harvest (80.4%), shorter immobilization (76.8%), and quicker recovery (73.2%) with their technique. Advocates of trapeziectomy alone cited simplicity (97.7%), fewer complications (86.4%), and avoidance of autogenous tissue harvest (59.1%). In their comments, 45% of surgeons choosing trapeziectomy alone cited evidence as an additional rationale. Advocates of prosthetic arthroplasty cited improved pinch strength (83.3%) and improved range of motion (63.3%), while those preferring arthrodesis cited better pinch strength (90%) and frequently in their comments, durability. Of the surgeons who preferred a technique other than LRTI, 41.8% reported they had tried LRTI in the past, citing complexity of the procedure, flexor carpi radialis harvest, and longer operative time as reasons for moving on. Our study provides an update on current treatment trends and offers new insight into the reasons behind surgeons' decision making in the management of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Despite strong Level 1 evidence supporting the use of trapeziectomy alone, our findings demonstrate that most surgeons continue to supplement trapeziectomy with other techniques such as LRTI or suspensionplasty. Several factors including familiarity, personal experience (Level 4 evidence), and comfort may be more influential than Level 1 evidence in determining the techniques in a surgeon's armamentarium. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal technique for surgical management of Eaton stages II-IV CMC arthritis and how these studies will affect surgeons' choice.

Thumb Carpometacarpal Hemi-trapeziectomy: Creating a Balanced Arthroplasty

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is commonly encountered in Hand Surgery practice and can be quite disabling. Surgery is the best option for patients who have failed conservative management for thumb CMC arthritis. There are numerous surgical options to address thumb CMC arthritis with no clear advantage of one technique over the other. Methods: In this paper, we present our patient selection criteria and technique of hemi-trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty for patients with thumb CMC arthritis. Conclusions: Hemi-trapeziectomy is ideal for patients with Eaton stage II/III thumb CMC arthritis in whom the STT joint is spared.

The Effect of Axial Traction MRI on the Articular Cartilage Visibility in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

Thumb carpometacarpal arthritis has a high incidence. However, the degree of damage to the cartilage has not been accurately assessed. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of axial traction of the thumb carpometacarpal joint during magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) on the visibility of articular cartilage in patients with thumb carpometacarpal arthritis and to evaluate the articular cartilage defect using MRI findings. Forty-four patients with thumb carpometacarpal arthritis (14 males, 30 females) and a mean age of 67.3±8.6 yearswere classified according to EatonStages 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 2, 14, 24, and 4 patients, respectively. Axial traction MRI was performed with and without traction (3 kg) using 3-Tesla MRI (Siemens Magnetom Skyra) with a 3D T2* multiecho data imaging combination. The effectiveness of traction was verified using the joint space width before and after traction at five points (central, volar, dorsal, radial, and ulnar margins) and the original articular cartilage outline visibility classification (poor, intermediate, complete). The rate of remaining cartilage on each joint surface was also evaluated. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 in this study. Joint space width increased significantly at all points with traction (P<0.01). The grade of articular cartilage outline visibility significantly improved from seven intermediate and 37 poor cases to 15 complete, 23 intermediate, and six poor cases(P<0.01). Significantly more articular cartilage remained in Stages 1-2 compared with Stages 3-4 arthritis of both articular surfaces (P<0.01 in first metacarpal, P=0.01 in trapezium). Axial traction of the thumb increased the joint space width and improved articular cartilage visibility in the thumb carpometacarpal joint. Our results suggested that axial traction MRI can be used for noninvasive evaluation of articular cartilage defects in patients with thumb carpometacarpal arthritis and aid in selecting the optimal surgical procedure.

Tenoplasty in suspension with or without tendon interposition: A prospective randomized study in the treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis

IntroductionThe aim of this prospective and randomized study is to analyze and compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (Eaton-Littler grade III and IV). Materials and methods52 consecutive patients underwent surgical intervention by two different surgical techniques and checked for subjective outcomes (DASH, NPRS), objective outcomes (ROM, opposition test, grinding test, pulp pinch, hand grip) and radiographic outcomes. Surgical time was calculated. Results26 patients underwent suspension arthroplasty using abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition (Ceruso procedure) and 26 patients underwent arthroplasty using suspension tenoplasty of the flexor radialis carpi (Altissimi procedure). Both techniques were performed by a single surgeon and showed good and satisfactory results, with best outcome reported in Altissimi procedure regarding DASH and ROM (p = 0.011 and p = 0.012, respectively), with reduced surgical time (about 6 min less, p = 0.03). The proximal shift between scaphoid and the base of first metacarpal did not influence the final results of the cases treated. ConclusionThis study provides evidence that trapeziectomy in combination with both tendon suspension arthroplasty and tendon interposition are two surgical procedures useful to solve advanced basal joint arthritis. Patients who underwent suspension tenoplasty without tendon interposition seemed to be generally more satisfied with significantly better symptomatic and functional outcomes.

Radiographic Edema Is a Predictor of de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.

Background de Quervain's tenosynovitis (DeQ) is a clinical diagnosis; however, due to the symptom overlap with other pathologies, it can occasionally be challenging to make an accurate diagnosis, especially for nonorthopaedic trained physicians. Questions/Purposes We hypothesized that the ratio of radial-sided to ulnar-sided soft tissue swelling could serve as a universally accessible diagnostic tool to assist in differentiating DeQ from other upper extremity conditions. Patients and Methods We retrospectively identified patients with isolated DeQ (M65.4), thumb carpometacarpal arthritis (M18.X), or carpal tunnel syndrome (G56.0x) between 2018 and 2019. Five blinded, independent reviewers evaluated anterior-posterior radiographs of the affected wrist. A digital caliper was used to measure the shortest distance from the lateral cortex of the distal radius and the medial cortex of the distal ulna to the outer edge of the radial and ulnar soft tissue shadows, respectively. Results The mean radial:ulnar ratio in the DeQ group was significantly larger than in the control groups. The interclass correlation coefficient showed strong agreement between all measurements. Patients with a radial:ulnar ratio of 1.7 or higher had a 61% chance of having DeQ with a 56.5% sensitivity, 66.3% specificity, 59.3% positive predictive value (PPV), and 63.8% negative predictive value. A ratio of more than 2.5 correlates to a 55% chance of having DeQ with a sensitivity of 12.9%, specificity of 96.9%, and PPV of 78.6%. Conclusion The ratio of radial- to ulnar-sided wrist edema can be used as a novel diagnostic aid in DeQ, especially for those not trained in orthopaedics or hand surgery. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic study.

Carpometacarpal Joint Pathology in the Thumb and Hand: Evaluation and Management of Difficult Conditions.

Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty with complete trapeziectomy with or without suspensionplasty, ligament reconstruction, and/or tendon interposition is largely considered equivalent techniques in providing pain relief and improving function for patients with thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. In cases of continued pain, instability, and dysfunction following an index surgery, one must first identify the cause of failure. Any options for revision surgery depend on addressing the specific cause of persistent symptoms with awareness of available options. Most of the patients undergoing revision surgeries can achieve good to fair outcomes.

Is Hand Therapy Associated With a Delay in Surgical Treatment in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis?

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) causes functional disability and an increased health care burden in the aging population. The role of therapy in thumb CMC OA has been minimally analyzed in the literature. We hypothesized that patients treated with therapy for thumb CMC OA would demonstrate reduced rates of surgery for this diagnosis. We queried a national insurance dataset for all patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code for thumb CMC OA, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. A 2:1 propensity-matched cohort of patients with CMC OA who did not receive therapy versus a therapy cohort was created, with a minimum of two sessions of hand therapy for inclusion. The primary outcome was the rate of thumb CMC OA surgery occurring within 2 years of diagnosis; time to surgery and use of thumb CMC injections were secondary outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for undergoing surgical treatment. After matching, the therapy cohort comprised 14,548 patients, with a matched group of 28,930 patients who did not undergo therapy. In the overall sample, the rate of surgery within 2 years was 22.5%. Two-year surgical treatment rates were significantly higher for those who did not undergo therapy when compared with those who did (29.3% vs 13.1%). Patients treated with therapy had a significantly longer time to surgery, with no difference in the rate of surgery after one year. In multivariable regression of all included variables, lack of therapy intervention had the highest odds of surgery for thumb CMC OA (odds ratio 4.3). We present the findings of a large insurance database evaluating the association of therapy with rates of surgical treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. On average, those treated with therapy had longer times to surgery, and the 2-year surgery rates for patients diagnosed with thumb CMC arthritis were significantly higher in those who did not undergo therapy treatment. Prognostic II.

Selective Denervation for the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint: Clinical Outcome and Comparison Based on Eaton Stage.

Various operative treatment options for advanced thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis have been presented without a definite surgical guideline. Selective denervation is a less invasive method for thumb CMC arthritis. However, it is unclear whether the clinical outcome varies with the stage of thumb CMC arthritis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of selective denervation on CMC arthritis for pain relief and functional outcome and to determine whether selective denervation depends on the stage of thumb CMC arthritis. We evaluated 29 thumbs of 28 patients with thumb CMC arthritis treated with selective denervation. The disease stage was determined with the classification system described by Eaton. The denervation was performed in the articular branches of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, and superficial branch of radial nerve. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, along with evaluation of the improvement in both postoperative range of motion and strength recovery. The mean duration of follow-up was 24 months (range, 18-48 months). The average VAS and DASH scores decreased from 6.1 to 1.3 and from 54.3 to 24.1, respectively. The range of motion during palmar abduction and opposition of the metacarpophalangeal joint improved with an increase in mean value from 44.1 to 53.7 degrees, and the Kapandji score increased from 7.2 to 9.2, respectively. The grip and key pinch strengths increased from mean preoperative values of 14.3 and 3.1 kg to 27.1 and 6.2 kg, respectively, as measured at the 12-month follow-up. The rate of change in the VAS and DASH scores was significantly higher in stages I to III than in stage IV ( P = 0.01, P < 0.01, respectively). The selective denervation for thumb CMC arthritis was effective in pain relief and functional recovery with several advantages, including less invasive procedure, quick recovery time, and regaining of strength. The clinical outcomes were more effective in the early-stage group (Eaton stages I and II) compared with the advance-stage group (Eaton stages III and IV).

Total joint arthroplasty versus resection-interposition arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Thumb carpometacarpal (TCMC) osteoarthritis is a common condition that causes pain and functional limitations. We compared the outcomes of 2 surgical procedures for TCMC osteoarthritis, the Epping resection-suspension arthroplasty and the double-mobility TCMC prosthesis, and focused on pain relief, functional outcomes, and patient quality of life. Over a 7-year period a randomized controlled trial including 183 cases of TCMC osteoarthritis was conducted comparing a double mobility TCMC prosthesis (Moovis, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) with the Epping resection-suspension arthroplasty. Pre- and postoperative examinations included the range of motion (ROM), SFMcGill score, visual analogue scale (VAS), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). At the 6-week postoperative follow-up, significant differences were found in VAS: Epping median 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-5.0) vs. TCMC prosthesis 2.0 (IQR 0.25-4.0), p = 0.03, effect size (area under the curve [AUC]) 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.73), in DASH score: Epping 61 (IQR 43-75) vs. TCMC prosthesis 45 (IQR 29-57), p < 0.001, AUC 0.69 (CI 0.61- 0.78), and in radial abduction: Epping 55 (IQR 50-60) vs. TCMC prosthesis 62 (IQR 60-70), p = 0.001, AUC 0.70 (CI 0.61-0.79). No significant group differences were found at the 6- and 12-months follow-up. During the follow-up period, 3 of 82 prostheses had to be revised but there was no revision in the Epping group. The double mobility TCMC prosthesis had superior outcomes compared with the Epping procedure at 6 weeks; however, there were no significant differences in outcomes at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The implant survival rate of 96% after 12 months was acceptable.

Radiographic Evaluation after Arthroscopic Partial Trapeziectomy with Suture-button Suspensionplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

The authors retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy with suture-button suspensionplasty for thumb carpometacarpal arthritis between 2016 and 2021. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded, and the correlations between them were evaluated. The average patient age at surgery was 69 years. Patient radiologic evidence was Eaton stage Ⅱ in three thumbs, Ⅲ in 25 thumbs, and Ⅳ in five thumbs. The average trapezial space ratio (TSR) was 0.36 immediately after the operation but declined to 0.32 after 6 months. In contrast, the average joint subluxation was reduced to 0.005 immediately after the operation compared with 0.28 before, and was maintained at 0.04 at final follow-up. A statically significant correlation was detected between grip strength and TSR (P = 0.03), and between pinch strength and TSR (P = 0.02). A significant correlation was detected between TSR and trapezium height (P = 0.0215), which remained after partial trapeziectomy. No correlation was detected between rope position and other clinical or radiographic scores. Suture-button can have an effect on the medialization of the first metacarpal base. Excessive trapeziectomy can result in functional deficiency of the thumb through metacarpal subsidence, which potentially causes loss of grip and pinch strength.

Anatomical Variations of the First Dorsal Compartment in de Quervain Tenosynovitis

De Quervain tenosynovitis of the wrist is a common pathology. The primary aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of extensor pollicis brevis and abductor pollicis longus (APL) anatomical variations in association with de Quervain tenosynovitis. The secondary aim was to compare additional patient-specific factors associated with de Quervain tenosynovitis. This retrospective study included 172 patients with de Quervain tenosynovitis who underwent first dorsal compartment release and 179 patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis who underwent thumb CMC arthroplasty between August 1, 2007, and May 1, 2022. The CMC group was chosen as the control group because the study surgeons perform APL suspensionplasty as the primary procedure for thumb CMC arthritis, allowing for a comparison group without de Quervain tenosynovitis. Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing revision surgery, patients undergoing thumb CMC procedure other than APL suspensionplasty, and patients with both CMC and first dorsal compartment diagnoses. Demographics, clinical variables, and intraoperative findings were collected through retrospective chart reviews. Patients in the de Quervain tenosynovitis group tended to be younger (51 years, range: 23-92 years vs 63 years, range: 28-85 years), women (86.1% vs 77.1%), and more commonly of African American or black race (15.7% vs 3.9%) and Asian race (5.2% vs 0%). There was a higher prevalence of tendon subcompartments (79.1% vs 64.2%), but fewer number of APL slips (38.3% vs 20.7% 2 or fewer slips) seen in the de Quervain tenosynovitis group. Anatomical variation exists between patients with and without de Quervain tenosynovitis. The presence of tendon subcompartments but not an increased number of tendon slips is associated with de Quervain tenosynovitis.

Use of Treatments after Recovery from Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis Surgery.

Which treatments patients continue to use more than 1 year after primary thumb carpometacarpal arthritis surgery, and how such use relates to patient-reported outcomes, is largely unknown. The authors identified patients who had isolated primary trapeziectomy alone or with ligament reconstruction ± tendon interposition and were 1 to 4 years postoperative. Participants completed a surgical site-focused electronic questionnaire about what treatments they still used. Patient-reported outcome measures were the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and visual analog/numerical rating scales for current pain, pain with activities, and typical worst pain. A total of 112 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and participated. At a median of 3 years after surgery, over 40% reported current use of at least one treatment for their thumb carpometacarpal surgical site, with 22% using more than one treatment. Of those who still used treatments, 48% used over-the-counter medications, 34% used home or office-based hand therapy, 29% used splinting, 25% used prescription medications, and 4% used corticosteroid injections. A total of 108 participants completed all patient-reported outcome measures. With bivariate analyses, the authors found that use of any treatment after recovering from surgery was associated with statistically and clinically significantly worse scores for all measures. Clinically relevant proportions of patients continue to use various treatments a median of 3 years after primary thumb carpometacarpal arthritis surgery. Continued use of any treatment is associated with significantly worse patient-reported outcomes for function and pain.

Discrepancy between Radiographic and Arthroscopic Findings of Thumb Basilar Joint Arthritis: A Preliminary Clinical Report.

Twenty patients with symptomatic thumb CMC arthritis underwent arthroscopy of thumb CMC and STT joints with concomitant synovectomy or arthroplasty depending on the degree of articular degeneration found. All patients had preoperative radiographs of the thumb CMC and STT joints. Radiographic degeneration was graded based on the Eaton-Glickel classification. Intraoperative arthroscopic images were reviewed and graded based on the Brown grading system. At the thumb CMC joint, five patients had discordant radiographic and arthroscopic findings of arthritis. At the STT joint, one patient had discordant radiographic and arthroscopic findings of arthritis. In comparing the two staging systems, we found a small subset of patients that demonstrated significant discrepancies. Clinical evaluation remains essential, and patients should be informed that radiographs may underestimate the actual severity of arthritis.

Arthrodesis of the First to Second Metacarpal for Definitive Management of Failed Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Case Series.

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty with resection of the trapezium and soft tissue interposition, with or without ligament reconstruction, has historically proven to be an efficacious treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. The incidence of failure following primary thumb CMC arthroplasty is low; however, the evaluation and management of a patient experiencing an unsatisfactory outcome following CMC arthroplasty is challenging. If symptoms are refractory to conservative measures, then revision surgical treatment may be indicated. Clinical decision making becomes even more complicated in cases of failure after an initial revision surgery has already been performed. In patients with a failed CMC arthroplasty revision in whom all soft tissue options have been exhausted, the senior author considers arthrodesis of the first metacarpal base to the second metacarpal base as a salvage procedure. The authors describe this surgical technique and present our experience with 4 cases in 3 patients who underwent this surgical intervention. Successful radiographic fusion was achieved in all 4 cases, with satisfactory clinical outcome in 3 out of 4 cases, supporting this surgical technique as a definitive option for patients who have failed multiple CMC arthroplasty revision surgeries.

A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Denervation With Suspension Arthroplasty for Treatment of Carpometacarpal Arthritis of the Thumb

Trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty is the most popular treatment for thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. However, carpometacarpal denervation has recently shown promise as an alternative treatment option. This study was designed to compare functional outcomes, pain reduction, and quality of life between denervation and suspension arthroplasty in patients treated for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. We conducted a prospective clinical trial between June 2020 and December 2021. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were conducted on patients, including the evaluation of functional outcomes via the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, pain with the visual analog score, quality of life with the EuroQol-5D, and the evaluation of time to return to function. Outcomes and complications were compared between patients undergoing denervation versus arthroplasty. Forty-eight patients were included in the study, 34 of whom underwent denervation and 14 underwent suspension arthroplasty of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. Patients in the denervation group were younger, with an average age of 59 years compared with 67 years in the arthroplasty group. All other patient characteristics were similar. Pain reduction, functional outcomes, and quality of life scores showed equal improvement in both groups. Denervation patients had a reduced time to return to function (3.3 weeks vs 4.5 months in the arthroplasty group). Carpometacarpal denervation appears to provide similar short-term outcomes as suspension arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. Treatment with denervation may offer a quicker return to function. The long-term outcomes of denervation remain unknown. Therapeutic IV.

Thumb metacarpal dislocation after trapeziectomy with ligamentous reconstruction and tendon interposition: A case report

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is one of the most common and debilitating pathologies evaluated by the hand surgeon, affecting up to 35% of individuals over 55 years of age. Though multifactorial in etiology, dorsal and radial subluxation of the thumb CMC due to incompetency of the volar beak ligament is thought to be among the most important factors contribution to the arthritis. Multiple operative interventions have been proposed to best address this pathology. In the United States, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) as described by Burton and Pellegrini remains the most widely used technique. As an isolated trauma, dislocation of the thumb CMC joint is a rare injury, only comprising approximately 1% of injuries evaluated by hand surgeons. Typically, thumb CMC dislocations occur due to axial load with the thumb in a flexed position. They are most commonly dorsal dislocations, and are thought to occur due to failure of the dorsoradial ligament. To date, no cases of CMC dislocation after LRTI have yet been described in the literature. Here we present a patient with volar thumb CMC dislocation as a rare complication after LRTI. After percutaneous pinning and immobilization followed by hand therapy, the patient has had a successful return to work with improved pain, restored function, and no further instability.

Comparative study on the effectiveness of bone grafting for arthrodesis of the thumb carpometacarpal arthritis.

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of autogenous bone grafting for arthrodesis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint by comparing the bone union rates with and without bone grafting. We included 36 patients who underwent arthrodesis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint for arthritis (20 patients with bone grafts and 16 without bone grafts). Implants used for internal fixation were K-wire, tension band wiring, headless compression screw and locking plate. The presence of bone union and the time from surgery to bone union were evaluated. The bone union rate was 20/20 (100%) in the bone grafting group and 12/16 (75%) in the non-bone grafting group (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the time from surgery to bone union and patient characteristics. In conclusion, autogenous bone grafting may contribute to the bone union in the arthrodesis of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis.Level of evidence: III.

Evaluation of PROMIS Scores 6 Weeks after Conservative Management of Carpometacarpal Thumb Arthritis.

Background:Patient-reported outcome measures are being increasingly emphasized to assign value to care‚ given the current trend toward pay-for-performance healthcare. We sought to determine if the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), a general questionnaire, is sensitive enough to detect improvement after corticosteroid injection or splinting/hand therapy for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis.Methods:This is a retrospective study analyzing two groups with thumb CMC arthritis: 88 patients who received splinting/hand therapy and 6-week follow-up and 70 patients with steroid injection and 6-week follow-up. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) scores were collected at each visit. We used paired t-tests to compare 6-week follow-up scores to baseline scores within each group.Results:The mean age for the steroid injection group was 60.1 years old, and it was 61.8 years old for the returning splinting/hand therapy group. There were no significant differences in PROMIS PF, PI, Depression, or UE scores for patients who returned after 6 weeks of treatment with splinting/hand therapy. Moreover, at 6 weeks postinjection, PROMIS PF and UE scores marginally increased, whereas PI and Depression scores decreased with statistical significance.Conclusions:Hand surgeons should be aware of the limitations of PROMIS when evaluating patients after conservative treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. There were no significant differences in PROMIS scores for patients with thumb CMC arthritis who returned after receiving splinting/hand therapy for 6 weeks. Meanwhile, PI scores can be used primarily to monitor for improvement after steroid injection for thumb CMC arthritis.

Autologous Fat Grafting in the Upper Extremity: Defining New Indications.

Background:Autologous fat grafting is a commonly used technique in plastic surgery that can also be applied broadly in hand surgery. We present a case series to demonstrate the diverse indications for fat grafting in hand surgery.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed cases of fat grafting in the upper extremity in 2020. Cases representing a unique application of fat grafting were identified. Patient data, including demographics, diagnoses, preoperative and postoperative assessments, complications, patient satisfaction, and surgical operative reports, were recorded.Results:Five patients representing distinct indications for autologous fat grafting in the upper extremity were identified. Indications included hand rejuvenation (20.0%), burn/scar management (20.0%), tenolysis (20.0%), revision nerve decompression (20.0%), and carpometacarpal joint arthritis (20.0%). Average patient age was 60.4 years (range, 42–71). Average volume of fat injected was 15.2 ml (range, 1–37 ml). No major complications were noted (0.0%). All patients expressed satisfaction with their overall result with good functional outcomes (100%).Conclusions:Autologous fat grafting can be applied broadly in hand surgery. Indications for fat grafting in hand surgery include hand rejuvenation, burn/scar management, tenolysis, revision nerve decompression, and thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. Hand surgeons can easily incorporate fat grafting into their daily practice. Current literature supports fat grafting as a viable technique in hand surgery with lower-level studies.

Suspension arthroplasty using the palmaris longus tendon with a suture button for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a retrospective observational study

BackgroundThis study was performed to assess the clinical and radiographic results at a minimum of 2 years after ligament reconstruction suspension arthroplasty (LRSA) that comprised full trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using the palmaris longus tendon and the Mini TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL) for advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. MethodsWe clinically and radiographically evaluated 26 thumbs in 26 patients who had undergone LRSA at least 2 years previously. The mean follow-up period was 35.9 months. We evaluated the subjective clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores) and objective clinical outcomes (range of motion, pinch strength, grip strength, and trapezial space height ratio). ResultsAt the final follow-up evaluation, the mean visual analogue scale score was 11.1 (standard deviation (SD) 13.4) and the mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score was 9.39 (SD 10.1). The mean palmar and radial abduction were 62.3° (SD 11.8°) and 63.8° (SD 9.09°), respectively. The mean key pinch and grip strength were 3.92 (SD 1.07) kg and 19.7 (SD 7.77) kg, respectively. The mean trapezial space ratio was 0.21 (SD 0.10). The subjective clinical outcomes, range of motion, and pinch strength were significantly improved compared with preoperatively. ConclusionsLRSA for advanced-stage thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis relieves pain, improves range of motion and strength, and obtains favourable subjective patient-reported clinical outcomes.