Thrombotic Outcomes Research Articles

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Isolated Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia or Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia With Thrombosis.

No existing studies compare oral anticoagulants to treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis (HIT/HITT). This retrospective study evaluated thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in adults treated for HIT/HITT with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or warfarin between 2012 and 2023 within the Ochsner Health System. Patients with mechanical heart valves, valvular atrial fibrillation, antiphospholipid syndrome, active malignancy, or venous thromboembolism (VTE) within the previous 6 months were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of new or progressive VTE or arterial thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, duration of hospitalization, time to platelet recovery, and incidence of skin necrosis, gangrene, and amputation. Forty-nine patients receiving a DOAC and 30 patients receiving warfarin were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts. There were non-statistically significant increased rates of both the primary outcome (8.9% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.65) and the composite bleeding outcome (32.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.37) in the DOAC cohort. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The impact of body mass on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and extreme body weights exhibit varying risks of bleeding and thrombotic outcomes. Furthermore, extreme body weights can influence the pharmacodynamic response to potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor/prasugrel) and clopidogrel. Purpose This study aims to assess the impact of extreme body weights on cardiovascular outcomes, as well as the comparative efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel. Methods Data was extracted from the FORCE-ACS registry, a prospective, multicentre, registry, enrolling patients with ACS. Patients were stratified (in kg/m2) into the categories: underweight (body mass index [BMI] ≤20.0), normal weight (20.1–24.9), overweight (25.0–29.9), class 1 (30.0–34.9) and class 2 obesity (≥35.0). The primary thrombotic endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. The primary bleeding endpoint was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the risk of clinical events across the BMI categories. Restricted cubic splines were made to assess the continuous association of BMI with the risk of the primary endpoints, stratified for P2Y12-inhibitor therapy (potent vs. clopidogrel) and gender. Results The total included population consisted of 5,864 patients with ACS (mean age 65.2 years, 72.4% men), and were stratified into underweight (N=112 [2%]), normal weight (N=1,627 [28%]), overweight (N=2,697 [46%]), class 1 obesity (N=1,081 [18%]) and class 2 obesity (N=347 [6%]). Compared with normal weight (10.8%), the rate of primary bleeding outcome was higher in underweight (15.2%) patients, but lower in the overweight (8.9%), class 1 obesity (7.9%) and class 2 obesity (6.3%) categories. MACE occurred in 9.8% for the underweight group, 7.9% for normal weight, 7.0% for overweight, 8.0% for class, and 6.1% for class 2 obesity. After adjusting for confounding factors such as age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, access site, and medical therapy, each unit increase in BMI was associated with a decreased bleeding risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, p = 0.02), with no significant association found for MACE. Similar findings are demonstrated in the Kaplan Meier analysis (Figure 1A-1B). Subgroup analysis regarding bleeding risk and BMI did not show a significant interaction for potent P2Y12-inhibitor therapy versus clopidogrel and gender (P-value for interaction: 0.04 and 0.32, respectively)(Figure 2A-2D). Conclusions Our findings indicate a stronger correlation between BMI and bleeding risk compared to thrombotic risk, showing an increased risk for bleeding in patients with a low BMI. These results underscore the importance of careful monitoring and tailored interventions to mitigate bleeding risk in underweight patients.

Impact of thrombocytopenia on bleeding and thrombotic outcomes in adults with cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis

AbstractMalignancy is a risk factor for splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT). Data on the natural history of cancer-associated SpVT are limited. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 581 adult patients with cancer and SpVT. We aimed to characterize the impact of thrombocytopenia on major bleeding and progression or recurrence of SpVT within 1 year of an initial cancer-associated SpVT diagnosis. Baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet <100 × 103/μL within 15 days of SpVT diagnosis) was present in 39.5% of patients. A total of 39.2% of patients received therapeutic anticoagulation within 2 weeks of an SpVT diagnosis. The cumulative 1-year incidence of major bleeding was 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-13.2) and 16.2% (95% CI, 13.2-19.2) for SpVT recurrence/progression. In the multivariable regression analysis, therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with increased major bleeding (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.08-2.81) and decreased progression/recurrence of SpVT (aRR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86). Baseline thrombocytopenia was not independently associated with either major bleeding (aRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.43-1.34) or progression/recurrence of SpVT (aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.73-1.78). A secondary analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores for baseline thrombocytopenia corroborated that patients with thrombocytopenia did not have an increased bleeding risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.48-1.39). The multivariable analysis in which platelets were treated as a time varying covariate also did not reveal an association with major bleeding (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.55-1.45). Bleeding and thrombosis progression were frequent in patients with cancer-associated SpVT. Anticoagulation was associated with increased major bleeding and decreased thrombotic progression; thrombocytopenia did not impact the outcomes.

133: Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Outcomes in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with or without Systemic Anticoagulation

133: Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Outcomes in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with or without Systemic Anticoagulation

Comparison of clinical and serological features in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients, with and without associated systemic lupus erythematosus, followed for up to 42 years: A single centre retrospective study.

To assess the impact of concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on the clinicopathological manifestations of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This single-centre, retrospective study compared clinical and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) data from 118 patients, 58 with SLE-associated APS (SLE-APS), and 60 with primary APS. Median follow-up was 13.9 (IQR 7.7-19.3) and 8.6years (3.5-10.6) for the SLE-APS cohort and PAPS cohort, respectively. Age at diagnosis of APS was lower in the SLE-APS cohort (mean 35.9 vs PAPS: 46.7years; p < 0.05). Distribution of aPL subtypes was similar across cohorts. 198 thrombotic events were identified overall (index plus recurrent), with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thrombosis each occurring in just over half of patients in both cohorts. Microvascular thrombosis (12.1% vs 0%), and a mixed (any combination of venous, arterial and microvascular) thrombotic phenotype (19.0% vs 6.7%, p = 0.05) were more prevalent in SLE-APS patients. Recurrent thrombosis incidence rates (∼0.5 events/10-patient years), and Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival after index thrombosis, were similar. In the PAPS cohort, only: (i) triple-aPL-positivity was associated with a significantly higher recurrent thrombosis event rate (incidence rate ratio 2.22, p = 0.03) and lower recurrence-free survival after first thrombosis (log-rank test p = 0.01); (ii) lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positivity was associated with higher prevalance of arterial thrombosis (RR 2.69, p = 0.01), and lower prevlance of VTE (RR 0.48, p < 0.001), versus LA-negativity. Concomitant SLE does not appear to modify long-term recurrent thrombosis risk, or aPL phenotypes, in patients with APS. Triple-aPL-positivity and LA-positive status may have less influence on thrombotic outcomes in patients with SLE-APS compared to PAPS.

The Influence of Diabetes on Thrombotic Profiles and Outcomes on Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

BackgroundElevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is associated with vascular complications, including arterial thrombosis post-revascularization. However, the objective relationship between levels of HbA1c and coagulation profiles has not been established. This study aims to determine the association between specific coagulation parameters and variations in HbA1c in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. MethodsPatients with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) undergoing revascularization were prospectively evaluated between December 2020 and July 2023. Patients were categorized based on their HbA1c levels, and their thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM) results were compared at baseline, post-operatively day 1, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. The parameters included Maximum Amplitude (MA) with both adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA), as well as ADP and AA percent aggregation indicating clot strength. The study further assessed the differences in these parameters between groups with varying HbA1c levels through the use of unpaired Student t test for pairwise analysis and Mann-Whitney U tests. ResultsAmong 830 samples, those with HbA1c above 6.5 demonstrated a significant increase in ADP MA (52.6 vs. 43.5, p<0.01), AA MA (36.6 vs. 29.65, p<0.05), clot strength without platelets ActF MA (activator F: 13.10 vs. 10.80, p<0.01), and heparin neutralized uninhibited clot strength from thrombin activation HKH MA (heparinized kaolin with heparinase: 61.10 vs. 57.70, p<0.01) values at baseline. Post-operatively, patients with HbA1c levels greater than 6.5 had higher median functional fibrinogen CFF FLEV levels (citrated functional fibrinogen: 40.95 vs. 371.35, p<0.05) and higher formation of fibrin in response to stimulation of thrombin by tissue factor CFF MA values (22.90 vs. 20.40, p<0.05) when measured within 36 hours of intervention, with these trends staying consistent during the 1-month follow-up visit. The trend analysis revealed a progressive increase in ADP MA values with rising HbA1c values, indicating a unit increase in the thrombotic risk relationship. Regression analysis showed a positive relationship between HbA1c and both ADP MA (a 2.261 unit increase for each unit increase in HbA1c) and AA MA. The R-square values indicate that HbA1c only explains a small percentage of the variance in these parameters, suggesting the confounding influence of other factors contributing to thrombosis. ConclusionElevated HbA1c levels appear to be associated with pro-thrombotic tendencies in clot dynamics as measured by TEG-PM, particularly in parameters related to platelet function. HbA1c explains a limited proportion of the variability in these measures, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to evaluating clotting profiles in patients. This study lays the groundwork for further investigation into personalized antithrombotic strategies for patients with varying HbA1c levels.

Therapeutic Enoxaparin Dosing in Obesity.

This review aims to systematically summarize the available data on efficacy and safety of therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients and to identify gaps to guide future research. Medline and Embase were systematically searched for eligible studies (last searched December 20, 2023). Studies were included if they reported on therapeutic dosing regimens, adverse bleeding, thrombotic outcomes, or antifactor Xa (AFXa) monitoring in obese adult patients. The systematic review management tool Covidence was used to manage the study selection and data extraction process. The reference list from eligible studies was screened to determine any additional eligible studies. Sixteen studies were included in the analysis. Studies used a variety of doses, indications, and study designs making comparison difficult. Twelve studies reported the incidence of thrombotic events (median = 1.3% [interquartile range [IQR] = 0.3%-2.3%]) and all studies reported the incidence of bleeding events (median = 5.7% [IQR = 2.4%-14.5%]). Two of the 8 studies analyzing the influence of weight/body mass index (BMI) or dose per kg on AFXa levels reported statistically significant results. One study concluded that BMI did not affect achievement of target AFXa levels. However, the second study found that dosing using actual body weight was an independent predictor of supratherapeutic AFXa levels in the obese population. This is the first comprehensive review with a focus on therapeutic dosing of enoxaparin in obesity and has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Seven of the included studies were published since 2018 indicating that new evidence on this topic is emerging. There was inadequate evidence to support an optimal dosing strategy in obese patients due to the heterogeneity of the studies. The AFXa monitoring may be appropriate to guide dosing in this population. Further research is required to determine a suitable dosing regimen.

Unveiling the impact: Exploring thrombotic outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19—Comparing those with and without a cancer diagnosis.

e23318 Background: There is a shared hypercoagulable association of COVID-19 and cancer, noting an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TEE)in both conditions. The current study focuses on patients with concurrent COVID-19 and underlying cancer and compares incidence of TEE and related outcomes in this complex intersection of acute viral infection and oncological challenges. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined data from the Charleston Area Medical Center’s (CAMC) COVID-19 Registry, involving 5,479 adult, symptomatic, PCR-positive COVID-19 hospitalized patients (3/1/2020 to 1/20/2024). Demographics, co-morbidities, lab values, treatments, and outcomes were assessed. Propensity score matching (3:1) non-cancer patients vs those with an active cancer diagnosis was undertaken using sex and age. SAS 9.4 was utilized for the analysis. The groups were compared using Chi-square/Fisher’s Exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables and a logistic regression modelling to determine differences in key variables, the incidence of thromboembolic events and other outcomes. Results: After propensity matching, 1,623 non-cancer and 427 active cancer patients were included. The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher in the active cancer group (9.42% vs 4.2%, P &lt; 0.001) with no significant differences in acute stroke. Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, mechanical or non-invasive ventilation requirement, and mortality were not different although more patients with cancer were discharged to hospice (11.8% vs 3.3%, P &lt; 0.001). However, mean D-dimer results in both groups were &gt; 2.5 mg/L, it was not performed consistently. The active cancer group had greater frequencies of abnormal ferritin levels (59.1% vs 49.1%, P=0.01), and elevated procalcitonin levels &gt; 0.05 ng/mL (72.9% vs 60.6%, p &lt; 0.001). Among key treatments, remdesivir was used more frequently in cancer patients (41.4% vs 35.7%, P &lt; 0.01). In addition to the cancer diagnosis (OR = 1.729 95% CI [1.1-2.8] P =0.02), LOS &gt; / = 7days was also a predictor of TEE (OR= 1.825 95% CI [1.1-2.9] P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: Symptomatic VTE rates in our COVID-19 and active cancer cohort align with published studies. Diligence in evaluation of D-dimer, early detection of TEE and adherence to published guidelines in prophylaxis and treatment is recommended.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from a global federated health network

Abstract Background Few data are available on the clinical course of patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Purpose To evaluate the 1-year risk of all-cause death, thromboembolic events, and bleeding in AF patients with NAFLD. Methods Retrospective cohort study within the global TriNetX platform. Patients with AF were categorized into two groups: i) AF with NAFLD and ii) AF without liver diseases. The primary outcomes were the 1-year risks of a composite outcome of i) all-cause death and thrombotic events (all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic arterial thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), and hemorrhagic outcome (intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding). Secondary outcomes were each component of the composite primary outcomes. Cox regression analysis before and after propensity-score-matching (PSM) was used to estimate HR and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Sensitivity analyses were done to investigate the risk associated with cirrhosis and type of oral anticoagulant. Results We identified 22,636 AF patients with NAFLD (69±12 years, 46.7% females) and 391,014 AF patients without NAFLD (72±12 years, 42.7% females). Before PSM, AF patients with NAFLD were younger, and with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors than those without liver disease. After PSM, no difference was found between the two groups, but NAFLD patients showed a higher 1-year risk of thrombotic (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.47-1.61) and hemorrhagic (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.42-1.72) composite outcomes (Figure 1). The higher risk in NAFLD was consistent also for all the secondary outcomes (Figure 1). On the sensitivity analyses (Figure 2), a progressively increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events was found in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients compared to patients without liver diseases, whereas non-vitamin-k antagonist (NOAC) seems to be safer and more effective than warfarin. Conclusion In AF patients, NAFLD is associated with a higher 1-year risk of all-cause death, thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Further studies are needed to establish the best clinical approach to manage NAFLD in AF patients.Figure 1Figure 2

Optimal Timing for Resumption of Anticoagulation After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valves.

Anticoagulation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mechanical heart valves is often held for risk of ICH expansion; however, there exists a competing risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Optimal timing to resume anticoagulation remains uncertain. We retrospectively studied patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves from 2000 to 2018. The primary outcome was a composite end point of symptomatic hematoma expansion or new ICH, AIS, and intracardiac thrombus up to 30 days post-ICH. The exposure was timing of reinitiation of anticoagulation classified as early (resumed up to 7 days after ICH), late (≥7 and up to 30 days after ICH), and never if not resumed or resumed after 30 days post-ICH. We included 184 patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves (65 anticoagulated early, 100 late, 19 not resumed by day 30 post-ICH). Twelve patients had AIS, 16 new ICH, and 6 intracardiac thromboses. The mean time from ICH to anticoagulation was 12.7 days. Composite outcomes occurred in 12 patients resumed early (18.5%), 14 resumed late (14.0%), and 4 never resumed (21.1%). There was no increased hazard of the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [95% CI, 0.2-6.0]), AIS, or worsening or new ICH among patients resumed early versus late. There was no difference in the composite among patients never resumed versus resumed. Patients who never resumed anticoagulation had significantly more severe ICH (median Glasgow Coma Scale: 10.6, 13.9, and 13.9 among those who resumed never, early, and late, respectively; P=0.0001), higher in-hospital mortality (56.5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively; P<0.0001), and an elevated 30-day AIS risk (HR, 15.9 [95% CI, 1.9-129.7], P=0.0098). In this study of patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves, there was no difference in 30-day thrombotic and hemorrhagic brain-related outcomes when anticoagulation was resumed within 7 versus 7 to 30 days after ICH. Withholding anticoagulation >30 days was associated with severe baseline ICH, higher in-hospital case fatality, and elevated AIS risk.

Predictors of bleeding and thrombotic events among patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer: insights from the ACTION randomized clinical trial.

Therapeutic anticoagulation showed inconsistent results in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and selection of the best patients to use this strategy still a challenge balancing the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes. The present post-hoc analysis of the ACTION trial evaluated the variables independently associated with both bleeding events (major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) and the composite outcomes thrombotic events (venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or major adverse limb events). Variables were assessed one by one with independent logistic regressions and final models were chosen based on Akaike information criteria. The model for bleeding events showed an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.73), while the model for thrombotic events had an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.79). Non-invasive respiratory support was associated with thrombotic but not bleeding events, while invasive ventilation was associated with both outcomes (Odds Ratio of 7.03 [95 CI% 1.95 to 25.18] for thrombotic and 3.14 [95% CI 1.11 to 8.84] for bleeding events). Beyond respiratory support, creatinine level (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.01 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02 for every 1.0mg/dL) and history of coronary disease (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.32 to 10.29) were also independently associated to the risk of thrombotic events. Non-invasive respiratory support, history of coronary disease, and creatinine level may help to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at higher risk of thrombotic complications.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04394377.

Abstract 1095: Association Between Active Cancer And The Risk Of Thrombotic And Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients With Covid-19

Background: Active cancer and COVID-19 are each independently associated with excess risk of thrombotic and cardiovascular outcomes. Data are limited regarding the risk of these outcomes in patients with both active cancer and COVID-19. Aim: To examine the association between active cancer and thrombotic and cardiovascular outcomes among patients with COVID-19. Methods: Data from patients with confirmed COVID-19 from the multicenter CORONA-VTE Network registry were used. Active cancer was defined as having a malignancy diagnosis within the past year or receiving related treatment. Outcomes were adjudicated and included (1) a composite of venous and arterial thromboembolism and (2) a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including thromboembolism, heart failure, myocarditis, new atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular death within 90 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: The registry included 3,844 inpatients and 6,576 outpatients, of whom 247 (6.4%) and 199 (3.0%) had active cancer, respectively. For inpatients with and without cancer, the cumulative incidences of thromboembolism were 8.6% and 8.3%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR:1.05; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.68-1.64, P = 0.82) (Figure). The corresponding cumulative incidences of cardiovascular events were 16.1% and 15.3% (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.75-1.45, P = 0.79). For outpatients with and without cancer, the cumulative incidences of thromboembolism were 3.6% and 1.2%, respectively (HR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.41-6.67, P = 0.005). Corresponding cumulative incidences of cardiovascular events were 4.6% and 1.9% (HR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.25-4.86, P = 0.009). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic or cardiovascular events among inpatients with and without active cancer, yet outpatients with COVID-19 and active cancer demonstrated a significantly increased hazard of thrombotic and cardiovascular events compared with non-cancer outpatients.

Abstract 2006: Estrogen Therapy Is Associated With A Greater Risk Of Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic Syndrome And Thrombosis In Cisgender Women, But Spares Transgender Women: A Global Retrospective Study

Despite the use of estrogen-based therapies in cisgender- and transgender-women, and the presumed cardioprotective effect of endogenous estrogen, there are no comprehensive studies investigating the risk of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome in patients taking exogenous estrogen. CKM syndrome is a health disorder attributable to connections among obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease, including heart failure (HF), ischemic heart disease (IHD), and stroke. We hypothesized that cis- and trans-women would have decreased risk of CKM syndrome. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX database, which contains patient information from 83 healthcare organizations worldwide. We identified 9,271,702 cis-women +/- estrogen and 17,729 trans-women on estrogen matched 1:1 with cis-men and separated patients into age deciles from 20-69 years. Cis-women taking estrogen showed a significantly increased risk of CKM comorbidities including dyslipidemia, HTN, T2DM, overweight/obesity (OB), HF, IHD, and CKD (p&lt;0.0001 for all), and an elevated risk of thrombotic outcomes, such as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) compared to cis-women not taking estrogen (p&lt;0.0001 for all). In contrast, the use of estrogen in trans-women compared to cis-men was not associated with a greater risk of MI, stroke, PE, or DVT, (except in the 60-69 year-aged cohort for DVT, p=0.0056). Trans-women taking estrogen also had a lower risk of HTN, T2DM, HF, IHD, and CKD, despite a higher risk of dyslipidemia, and OB compared to cis-men (p=0.02-&lt;0.0001). This is the first comprehensive study revealing a significant association between exogenous estrogen use and CKM syndrome in cis-women. Additionally, our novel findings indicate that estrogen use in trans-women is associated with dyslipidemia, and OB, but is not associated with a greater overall risk for CKM syndrome or thrombosis. Given these findings, additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the risks or protections provided by estrogen therapy in cisgender and transgender women.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome carries an increased lifetime risk for obstetric and thrombotic complications—a population-based study

BackgroundAntiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can present with either a thromboembolic event (thrombotic APS, TAPS) or an obstetric complication (obstetric APS, OAPS). Data on long-term complications in the different APS phenotypes are limited. ObjectivesWe aimed to compare obstetric history, antiphospholipid antibody profiles, obstetric and thromboembolic complications, and pregnancy outcomes between TAPS and OAPS. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included women who delivered singleton pregnancies between 1998 and 2020. One hundred sixteen thousand four hundred nine women were included, resulting in 320,455 deliveries. Among the included patients, 71 were diagnosed with APS, 49 were classified as OAPS, and 22 as TAPS. The demographics, obstetric, neonatal, and thrombotic outcomes were compared among TAPS, OAPS, and the general obstetric population. ResultsOAPS patients had an increased risk of thrombotic events compared with the general obstetric population (odds ratio [OR] 18.0; 95% CI, 8.7-37.2). In pregnancies following the diagnosis of APS, despite standard antithrombotic treatment, OAPS patients exhibited an elevated risk of placenta-related and neonatal complications compared with the general obstetric population (late fetal loss [adjusted OR {aOR}, 15.3; 95% CI, 0.5-27.5], stillbirth [aOR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.2-15.4], placental abruption [aOR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.5-15.3], preeclampsia [aOR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.5-7.7], fetal growth restriction [aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 8.5-27.5], small for gestational age neonate [aOR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4-6.6], and low Apgar scores [Apgar'1: aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-10.4; Apgar'5: aOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.4]). TAPS patients exhibited increased risk of preeclampsia (aOR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2-8). ConclusionOAPS patients exhibit a heightened risk of thrombotic events compared with the general obstetric population. Despite treatment, OAPS and TAPS still presented obstetric complications. These findings, after confirmation in prospective studies, need to be taken into consideration when planning the treatment approach for these patients.

Impact of Thrombophilic Polymorphisms in Antenatal Women on Perinatal Health: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

Despite pregnancy's hypercoagulable state, the correlation between inherited thrombophilia and thrombotic adverse pregnancy outcomes remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of inherited thrombophilic polymorphisms among asymptomatic pregnant individuals and to examine their potential correlation with adverse perinatal outcomes. in this single-center prospective study, 105 healthy pregnant women were included. Genotyping was conducted for factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin gene mutation, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase enzyme (MTHFR) C677T, MTHFR A1298C, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), alongside the assessment of protein C (PC), protein S (PS), and antithrombin (AT) levels. The study analyzed the association between inherited thrombophilic polymorphisms and pregnancy complications linked to placental insufficiency, such as gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PE), intrauterine death (IUD), fetal growth restriction (FGR), and placental abruption. The prevalence of identifiable thrombophilic polymorphism mutations was 61.9% (95% confidence interval-CI 52.4-70.8%), with the most common single mutation being PAI-1 4G/5G (12/105, 11.4%, 95% CI 6.4-18.5). The most frequent combined mutation was heterozygosity for MTHFR C677T and PAI-1 (12/105, 11.4%, 95% CI 6.4-18.5). Notably, no FVL homozygous carriers or single homozygous and heterozygous carriers for prothrombin polymorphisms were found. Additionally, no deficiencies in PC and AT were detected among participants. Except for homozygosity for PAI-1, none of the studied polymorphisms demonstrated a significant association with pregnancy complications linked to placental insufficiency. The asymptomatic carriers of inherited thrombophilic polymorphisms do not have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

A meta-analysis to assess the risk of bleeding and thrombosis following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy is increasingly utilized for treatment of hematologic malignancies. Hematologic toxicities including thrombosis and bleeding complications have been reported. Accurate estimates for thrombotic and bleeding outcomes are lacking. ObjectivesWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy for an underlying hematologic malignancy with the objective to: a) assess the thrombosis and bleeding risk associated with CAR T-cell therapy, b) assess the impact of CRS and ICANS on the risks of thrombosis and bleeding, and c) assess the safety of anticoagulant or antiplatelet use in the period following treatment with CAR T-cell therapy. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to February 2022 for studies reporting thrombotic or bleeding outcomes in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Pooled event rates were calculated using a random-effects model. We performed subgroup analyses stratified by follow-up duration, CAR T-cell target antigen, and underlying hematologic malignancy. ResultsWe included 47 studies with a total of 7040 patients. High heterogeneity between studies precluded reporting of overall pooled rates of thrombotic and bleeding events. In studies with follow-up duration of ≤6 months, the pooled incidence of venous thrombotic events was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-3.4%; I2 = 0%) per patient-month, whereas the rate was 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.1%; I2 = 0%) per patient-month for studies with longer follow-up periods (>6 months). The pooled incidences of any bleeding events per patient-month in studies with follow-up duration of ≤6 months and >6 months were 1.9% (95% CI, 0.6%-3.1%; I2 = 78%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0%-0.8%, I2 = 40%), respectively. Secondary analyses by CAR T-cell target antigen, underlying malignancy, and primary outcome of the studies did not reveal significant differences in the rates of thromboembolism, any bleeding events, or major bleeding events. ConclusionThe risk of both thrombosis and bleeding following CAR T-cell therapy appears to be highest in the initial months following infusion.

Management of direct oral anticoagulant drug interactions in hospitalized patients.

Moderate-strong CYP3A4 or Pgp inhibitors and inducers alter direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) pharmacokinetics. Whether the presence of a DOAC drug-drug interaction (DDI) prompts in- hospital changes in management remains unknown. We identified all hospitalized patients at our institution who were admitted with a clinically relevant DOAC DDI from 01/2021 to 06/2021. Clinically relevant DOAC DDIs were defined as those listed in the prescribing information or FDA CYP3A4/Pgp inhibitors clinical indexes. We assessed the prevalence of DOAC DDIs and categorized their management as: drug stopped, drug held, or drug continued. For drugs that were continued we assessed whether the dose of the DOAC or interacting drug was increased, decreased or unchanged during the admission. We ascertained the number of DOAC DDIs that prompted an automated prescribing alert in our electronic health record (EHR). Finally, we conducted a logistic regression model to compare users of DOACs with DDI who had their regimen adjusted versus those without adjustments, focusing on outcomes of rehospitalization and death, adjusting for age and gender. Among 3,725 hospitalizations with a DOAC admission order, 197 (5%) had a clinically relevant DOAC DDI. The DOAC and the interacting drug were continued at discharge for 124 (63%) hospitalizations. The most frequent adjustments were stopping the interacting drug (73%) and stopping the DOAC (15%). Only 7 (4%) of DOAC DDIs prompted an EHR alert. The adjusted odds ratios for rehospitalizations and death, respectively, among patients whose regimens were adjusted compared to those whose were not, were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.48; P = 0.44) and 1.88 (95% CI, 0.91 to 3.89; P = 0.09). Clinically relevant DDIs with DOACs occur infrequently among hospitalized patients and usually are managed without stopping the DOAC. The clinical impact of such DDIs and subsequent adjustments on thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes requires further investigation.

Factor Xa Inhibitors versus warfarin in patients with morbid obesity and atrial fibrillation.

Factor Xa Inhibitors have emerged as a first-line agent in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but there is a need for additional data surrounding their use in the morbidly obese population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Factor Xa Inhibitors are as safe and effective as warfarin for the treatment of NVAF in individuals with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 and/or weight ≥ 120 kg. This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study comparing the use of Factor Xa Inhibitors (apixaban and rivaroxaban) to warfarin for the management of NVAF in adult patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 and/or weight ≥ 120 kg. The primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding within 12months. A total of 3,156 patients were included in the final analysis; 1,396 in the warfarin group and 1760 in the Factor Xa Inhibitor group. The mean weight and BMI of the overall cohort was 134.1kg and 44.7kg/m2, respectively. There was no difference in stroke or systemic embolism (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.78-1.85) or major bleeding (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65 - 1.53) with Factor Xa Inhibitors compared to warfarin after controlling for covariates. This analysis of real-world data suggests no difference in bleeding or thrombotic outcomes for severely obese patients with NVAF taking Factor Xa Inhibitors compared to warfarin. Overall, our study adds further data to support the use of Factor Xa Inhibitors as an alternative to warfarin in severely obese patients with NVAF.

Impact of vaccination on the association of COVID-19 with cardiovascular diseases: An OpenSAFELY cohort study

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombotic events, but the implications of vaccination for this increased risk are uncertain. With the approval of NHS England, we quantified associations between COVID-19 diagnosis and cardiovascular diseases in different vaccination and variant eras using linked electronic health records for ~40% of the English population. We defined a ‘pre-vaccination’ cohort (18,210,937 people) in the wild-type/Alpha variant eras (January 2020-June 2021), and ‘vaccinated’ and ‘unvaccinated’ cohorts (13,572,399 and 3,161,485 people respectively) in the Delta variant era (June-December 2021). We showed that the incidence of each arterial thrombotic, venous thrombotic and other cardiovascular outcomes was substantially elevated during weeks 1-4 after COVID-19, compared with before or without COVID-19, but less markedly elevated in time periods beyond week 4. Hazard ratios were higher after hospitalised than non-hospitalised COVID-19 and higher in the pre-vaccination and unvaccinated cohorts than the vaccinated cohort. COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of cardiovascular events after COVID-19 infection. People who had COVID-19 before or without being vaccinated are at higher risk of cardiovascular events for at least two years.

Clusterin knockdown has effects on intracellular and secreted von Willebrand factor in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.

Alterations in von Willebrand factor (VWF) have an important role in human health and disease. Deficiency of VWF is associated with symptoms of bleeding and excesses of VWF are associated with thrombotic outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms that drive VWF regulation can lead to a better understanding of modulation of VWF levels in humans. We identified clusterin (CLU) as a potential candidate regulator of VWF based on a single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis in control endothelial cells (ECs) and von Willebrand disease (VWD) endothelial colony-forming-cells (ECFCs). We found that patients with deficiencies of VWF (von Willebrand disease, VWD) had decreased CLU expression and ECs with low VWF expression also had low CLU expression. Based on these findings, we sought to evaluate the role of CLU in the regulation of VWF, specifically as it relates to VWD. As CLU is primarily thought to be a golgi protein involved in protein chaperoning, we hypothesized that knockdown of CLU would lead to decreases in VWF and alterations in Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs). We used both siRNA- and CRISPR-Cas9-based approaches to modulate CLU in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and evaluated VWF protein levels, VWF mRNA copy number, and WPB quantity and size. We demonstrated that siRNA-based knockdown of CLU resulted in decreases in VWF content in cellular lysates and supernatants, but no significant change in WPB quantity or size. A CRISPR-Cas9-based knockdown of CLU demonstrated similar findings of decreases in intracellular VWF content but no significant change in WPB quantity or size. Our data suggests that CLU knockdown is associated with decreases in cellular VWF content but does not affect VWF mRNA levels or WPB quantity or size.