Three-year Disease-free Survival Rates Research Articles

Evaluation of bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Although intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) for colon cancer requires longer operative time than extracorporeal anastomosis (EA), its short-term postoperative results, such as early recovery of bowel movement, have been reported to be equal or better. As IA requires opening the intestinal tract in the abdominal cavity under pneumoperitoneum, there are concerns about intraperitoneal bacterial infection and recurrence of peritoneal dissemination due to the spread of bacteria and tumor cells. However, intraperitoneal bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes have not been clarified. To clarify the effects of bacterial and tumor cell contamination of the intra-abdominal cavity in IA. Of 127 patients who underwent laparoscopic colon resection for colon cancer from April 2015 to December 2020, 75 underwent EA (EA group), and 52 underwent IA (IA group). After propensity score matching, the primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival rates, and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival rates, type of recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI) incidence, number of days on antibiotics, and postoperative biological responses. Three-year disease-free survival rates did not significantly differ between the IA and EA groups (87.2% and 82.7%, respectively, P = 0.4473). The 3-year overall survival rates also did not significantly differ between the IA and EA groups (94.7% and 94.7%, respectively; P = 0.9891). There was no difference in the type of recurrence between the two groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in SSI incidence or the number of days on antibiotics; however, postoperative biological responses, such as the white blood cell count (10200 vs 8650/mm3, P = 0.0068), C-reactive protein (6.8 vs 4.5 mg/dL, P = 0.0011), and body temperature (37.7 vs 37.5 °C, P = 0.0079), were significantly higher in the IA group. IA is an anastomotic technique that should be widely performed because its risk of intraperitoneal bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes are comparable to those of EA.

Comparative Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with D2 and D3 Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Patients with Right Colon Cancer

Introduction. The standard volume of removed groups of lymph nodes for right colon cancer (RCC) has not been determined. According to Japanese clinical guidelines, it is necessary to perform D3 lymphadenectomy in all cases, except stage I, while according to European and Russian clinical guidelines, the standard scope of surgical intervention includes only D2 lymphadenectomy. There are no long-term results regarding differences between D2 and D3 lymph node dissection in RCC; therefore, it is relevant to conduct studies to improve the long-term results of treatment of patients with RCC.Aim: to comparatively evaluate the results of treatment of patients with RCC who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center.Materials and methods. Conducted from 2018 to 2023, the study included 174 patients with stage I–III RCC: in 106 patients, laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed, in 68 patients — with D3 lymph node dissection. When assessing the homogeneity and comparability of the groups, according to input parameters, such as clinical stage, gender, age, body mass index and tumor location, their heterogeneity was noted, which did not allow a direct comparative assessment of both groups. To eliminate heterogeneity and adequately select groups, a pseudorandomization technique was used, after which the groups (n = 68) became statistically comparable in all main clinical parameters.Results. Statistically significant differences were obtained in the median duration of surgical intervention, which was longer in the group of patients with D3 lymph node dissection — 150 (60–393) and 213 (70–390) minutes (p < 0.001), and in the median time of flatus passage — 2 (1–4) and 3 (1–9) days, respectively (p = 0.042). Postoperative complications in accordance with the Clavien — Dindo classification occurred in 16 (23.5 %) patients in the group with D2 and in 15 patients (22.1 %) in the group with D3 lymph node dissection (p = 0.999); III–V grade complications were noted in 2 (2.9 %) cases in each group (p = 0.999). Postoperative hospital stay was 6 days for patients in both groups (p = 0.369). During pathomorphological assessment of the removed specimen, the median number of examined lymph nodes was significantly higher in the group with D3 lymph node dissection: 14 (1–52) and 19 (3–59) lymph nodes, respectively (p < 0.001). Involvement of apical lymph nodes (groups 203, 213, 223) was noted in 2 (3 %) patients. In the group with D2 lymph node dissection, distant metastases were recorded twice as often as in the group with D3 lymph node dissection — in 8 (11.8 %) and 4 (5.9 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.365). Local recurrence was not established in any case. The three-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 94.8 ± 3.0 and 100 % (p = 0.149) and 80.5 ± 5.8 and 88.7 ± 5.8 % (p = 0.177), respectively.Conclusions. The experience of using total mesocolonectomy with D3 lymph node dissection for RCC indicates the safety of this surgical intervention in comparison with traditional surgical techniques, while we did not obtain statistically significant differences in patient survival. To definitively determine the role of D3 lymph node dissection in the treatment of patients with RCC, large multicenter randomized studies are certainly needed.

"Things Have Changed"-Laparoscopic Cytoreduction for Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Experience of a Referral Center on 108 Patients.

To report the feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction surgery for primary and recurrent ovarian cancer in a select group of patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients with FIGO stage IIIA-IV advanced ovarian cancer who underwent laparoscopic primary debulking surgery (PDS), interval debulking surgery (IDS), or secondary debulking surgery (SDS) between June 2008 and January 2020. The primary endpoint was achieving optimal cytoreduction, defined as residual tumor less than 1 cm. Secondary endpoints included evaluating surgical complications and long-term survival, assessed at three-month intervals during the initial two years and then every six months. This study included a total of 108 patients, among whom, 40 underwent PDS, 44 underwent IDS, and 24 underwent SDS. Optimal cytoreduction rates were found to be 95.0%, 97.7%, and 95.8% for the PDS, ISD, and SDS groups, respectively. Early postoperative complications (<30 days from surgery) occurred in 19.2% of cases, with 7.4% of these cases requiring reintervention. One patient died following postoperative respiratory failure. Late postoperative complications (<30 days from surgery) occurred in 9.3% of cases, and they required surgical reintervention only in one case. After laparoscopic optimal cytoreduction with a median follow-up time of 25 months, the overall recurrence rates were 45.7%, 38.5%, and 39.3% for PDS, ISD, and SDS, respectively. The three-year overall survival rates were 84%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while the three-year disease-free survival rates were 48%, 51%, and 71%, respectively. Laparoscopic cytoreduction surgery is feasible for advanced ovarian cancer in carefully selected patients, resulting in high rates of optimal cytoreduction, satisfactory peri-operative morbidity, and encouraging survival outcomes. Future studies should focus on establishing standardized selection criteria and conducting well-designed investigations to further refine patient selection and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a two-stage procedure that can potentially cure patients with large cholangiocarcinoma. The current study evaluates the impact of modifications on the outcomes of ALPPS in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this single-center study, a series of 30 consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma (22 extrahepatic and 8 intrahepatic) who underwent ALPPS between 2011 and 2021 was evaluated. The ALPPS procedure in our center was modified in 2016 by minimizing the first stage of the surgical procedure through biliary externalization after the first stage, antibiotic administration during the interstage phase, and performing biliary reconstructions during the second stage. The rate of postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality, as well as the one- and three-year disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated and compared between patients operated before and after 2016. The ALPPS risk score before the second stage of the procedure was lower in patients who were operated on after 2016 (before 2016: median 6.4; after 2016: median 4.4; p = 0.010). Major morbidity decreased from 42.9% before 2016 to 31.3% after 2016, and the 90-day mortality rate decreased from 35.7% before 2016 to 12.5% after 2016. The three-year survival rate increased from 40.8% before 2016 to 73.4% after 2016. Our modified ALPPS procedure improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Minimizing the first step of the ALPPS procedure was key to these improvements.

Neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab therapy for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: A prospective multicenter phase II study.

We report the short/mid-term results of surgery for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC, four courses of S-1 + oxaliplatin+ bevacizumab) without radiotherapy with the primary aim of ypT0-2. High-risk LARC was defined as cT4b, mesorectal fascia (MRF) ≤1 mm (MRF+), or lateral lymph node metastasis (cLLN+) on high-resolution MRI. The planned 32 cases from April 2018 to December 2021 were all included. There were 10 patients at cT4b (31.2%), 26 MRF+ (81.3%), and 22 cLLN+ (68.8%). Thirteen (40.6%) underwent NAC after a colostomy for stenosis. NAC was completed in 26 (81.2%) cases. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in six (18.7%). One patient developed progressive disease (3.2%). Eleven were ycT0-3MRF-LLN- (34.3%). Curative-intent surgery was performed on 31, with sphincter-preserving surgery in 20, abdominoperineal resection in nine, total pelvic exenteration in two, and lateral lymph node dissection in 24. Two had R1/2 resection (6.4%). A Grade 3 or higher postoperative complication rate occurred in 3.2%. Pathological complete response and ypT0-2 rates were 12.9% and 45.1%. Three-year disease-free survival rates (3yDFS) for ypT0-2 and ypT ≥3 were 81.2%, 46.6% (p = 0.061), and 3-year local recurrence rates (3yLR) were 0%, 48.8% (p = 0.015). 3yDFS for ycT0-3MRF-LLN- and ycT4/MRF+/LLN+ were 87.5%, 48.0% (p = 0.031) and 3yLR were 0%, 42.8% (p = 0.045). NAC yielded a clinically significant effect in about half of high-risk LARC patients. If NAC alone is ineffective, radiotherapy should be added, even if extended surgery is intended.

Evaluation of Three-year Overall and Disease-free Survival in Iranian Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated by Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT): A Historical Cohort Single Center Study

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate and analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for Iranian patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NC). Methods: In this historical cohort study, 65 non-metastatic patients treated for NC with IMRT were selected and reviewed at the Shohadai-e-Tajrish Hospital between October 2017 and October 2019. Chemotherapy was given either as induction, concurrent, or adjuvant therapy in all cases. Three years of DFS and OS were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier and compared with the Pearson Correlation Test. Results: The mean age of patients was 43.38 years. The three-year DFS and OS rates were 95.72%, 92.32%, 72.73%, 73.26%, and 100%, 84.61%, 90.90%, and 79.41% in stage I, II, III, and IV patients, respectively (P = 0.119, P = 0.155). The total three-year DFS rate and the total three-year OS rate were 76.47% and 84.60% in all cases. Based on the Pearson Correlation Test, it was a significant correlation between the duration of IMRT time and three-year DFS (correlation=0.138, P = 0.017) and the number of concurrent cycles of chemotherapy with IMRT (correlation=0.375, P = 0.002). It was not a significant correlation between total time duration, MRI response, induction chemotherapy, age, sex, and the three-year DFS. There was a significant correlation between total time duration and three-year OS (correlation=0.263, P = 0.040) and the number of concurrent cycles of chemotherapy with IMRT and three-year OS (correlation=0.334, P = 0.007). It was not a significant correlation between the duration of IMRT time, MRI response, induction chemotherapy, age, sex, and the three-year OS. Conclusions: Our findings showed that IMRT with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy has the three-year DFS and OS, which were comparable with the other published results. We emphasize the number of concurrent cycles of chemotherapy with IMRT, which have an important role in both three-year DFS and OS. The duration of IMRT time has also an important role in the three-year DFS but not in the three-year OS. A longer follow-up for the patients to evaluate 10-year DFS and OS is recommended.

A randomized trial of consolidation-targeted adjuvant therapy with encorafenib and cetuximab versus usual care for patients with stage II/III BRAF V600E colon cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A022004.

TPS3641 Background: Patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) BRAF V600E mutant high-risk stage II (T4) or stage III colon cancer have a substantial risk of recurrence despite standard adjuvant therapy. In patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant colorectal cancer, the combination of the RAF inhibitor encorafenib and the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab has been shown to improve overall and progression-free survival compared to standard therapy after at least one prior line of therapy. This study will evaluate if this combination improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected BRAF V600E mutant pMMR/microsatellite stable (MSS) high-risk stage II (T4) or stage III colon cancer after standard adjuvant therapy. Methods: The study has a seamless phase II/III design, enrolling a maximum of 394 patients. BRAF mutation status can be determined locally or submitted for central testing in trial pre-screening. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to usual surveillance versus 6 months of treatment with encorafenib (300mg oral daily) plus cetuximab (500mg/m2 intravenous every 14 days). Stratification factors are adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (FOLFOX versus CAPOX), duration of adjuvant therapy (3 months versus &gt; 3 months), tumor stage (T4N0 versus T1-3N1 versus T4N1/TanyN2), and ctDNA marker status (detectable versus undetectable) at randomization. Adjuvant therapy must be completed at most 8 weeks prior to registration. For the phase II component, in the ctDNA detectable cohort, the primary endpoint will be ctDNA clearance rate at 6 months, and, in the ctDNA undetectable cohort, the primary endpoint will be 6-month ctDNA recurrence-free survival, where events consist of death, recurrence, or ctDNA positivity. The primary endpoint of the phase III component is DFS, and secondary endpoints are overall survival, adverse events, and alternative DFS calculated from the date of primary resection, rather than date of study randomization. Patient reported symptoms (PRO-CTCAE) will be collected and analyzed as an exploratory endpoint, and serial blood banking will support future correlative studies. The trial will proceed to the phase III portion if either of the two endpoints in the phase II cohorts is statistically superior in patients receiving encorafenib plus cetuximab. The phase III study sample size will provide 80% power at a one-sided α of 0.05 to detect an approximately 10% improvement in the three-year DFS rate, assuming 68% in the control arm. Two interim analyses will be performed for DFS endpoint. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG); Pfizer, Eli Lilly; Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05710406. Clinical trial information: NCT05710406 .

Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression in tumor tissues of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The cohort included 7,412 patients with CRC from January 2010 to December 2015. Survival outcomes were assessed based on tissue CEA (t-CEA) patterns and intensities. Three-year (76.7% versus 81.3%) and 5-year (71.7% versus 77.6%, p < 0.001) disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly (p < 0.001) poorer in patients with a diffuse-cytoplasmic pattern than an apicoluminal pattern. Three-year (79% versus 86.6%) and 5-year (74.6% versus 84.7%) DFS rates were also significantly (p < 0.001) poorer in patients with high than low t-CEA intensity. Three-year (84.6% versus 88.4%) and 5-year (77.3% versus 82.6%) overall survival (OS) rates were significantly (p < 0.001) poorer in patients with diffuse-cytoplasmic than apicoluminal pattern of CEA expression, and both 3-year (86.7% versus 91.2%) and 5-year (80.1% versus 87.7%) OS rates were significantly (p < 0.001) poorer in patients with high than low t-CEA intensity. Multivariate analyses showed that high-intensity t-CEA was independently associated with DFS (p = 0.02; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.233) and OS (p = 0.032; HR = 1.228). Therefore, high-intensity t-CEA is a significant prognostic factor in CRC, independent of serum CEA (s-CEA), and can complement s-CEA in predicting survival outcomes after CRC resection.

Supine bottom-up extralevator abdominoperineal excision for anorectal adenocarcinoma is not inferior to standard approach and may be thus safely performed.

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal carcinoma has been described in order to improve pathological and oncological results compared to standard APE. To obtain the same oncological advantages as extralevator APE, we have previously described a new procedure starting by a perineal approach: the supine bottom-up APE. Our objective is to compare oncological and surgical outcomes between the supine bottom-up APE and the standard APE. All patients with low rectal adenocarcinoma requiring APE were retrospectively included and divided into 2 groups: supine bottom-up APE (Group A) and standard APE (Group B). From 2008 to 2016, 61 patients were divided into Groups A (n = 30) and B (n = 31). Postoperative outcomes and median length of stay were similar between groups. Patients from Group A had a significantly longer distal margin (30 [8-120] vs. 20 [1.5-60] mm, p = 0.04) and higher number of harvested lymph nodes (14.5 [0-33] vs. 11 [5-25], p = 0.03) than those from Group B. Circumferential resection margin involvement was similar between groups (28 vs. 22%, p = 0.6), whereas tumors from Group A were significantly larger and more frequently classified as T4 than those from Group B. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group A (437.5 [285-655] minutes) than in Group B (537.5 [361-721] minutes, p = 0.0009). At the end of follow-up, local recurrence occurred in 7 and 16% of patients from Groups A and B (p = 0.68). Three-year overall and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups (87 vs. 90%, p = 0.62 and 61 vs. 63%, p = 0.88, respectively). Our findings suggest that supine bottom-up APE doesn't impair surgical outcomes, pathological results, overall and disease-free survivals in comparison with standard APE. This new procedure may be thus safely performed and decrease the operative time. Further randomized multicentric studies are required to confirm these results.

Efficacy and Safety of Camrelizumab in Combination with Docetaxel + S-1 Sequenced by Camrelizumab + S-1 for Stage III (PD-1+/MSI-H/EBV+/dMMR) Gastric Cancer: Study Protocol for a Single-Center, Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial.

BackgroundGastric cancer occupies the fourth highest morbidity rate of cancers worldwide. A higher incidence of gastric cancer had been found in East Asia compared to the other regions. Gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for Stage III gastric cancer, and postoperative systemic chemotherapy with docetaxel, S-1 improved patients’ disease-free survival rates. However, advances in immunotherapy bring innovations in the management of patients with gastric cancer. The objective of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with docetaxel + S-1, sequenced by camrelizumab + S-1 in stage III gastric cancer patients who are EBV positive, with defective mismatch repair and CPS ≥5.Methods and analysisThis prospective, open-label, single-arm trial was performed at Renji Hospital. In this study, a total of 70 adult patients aged 18–80 years with Stage III (PD-1+/MSI-H/EBV+/dMMR) gastric cancer confirmed by post-operative pathology will be enrolled after screening. Participants will receive the specific chemotherapy regimen until 1 year after the operation or until tumor recurrence or metastasis. The primary outcome is the 3-year disease-free survival rate measured by the Clopper-Pearson method and 95% confidence intervals. The secondary outcomes include overall survival, incidence and severity of adverse effects, and laboratory abnormalities. The data will be analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The patients will be followed up every 3 months with imaging investigation until clinical remission.Ethics and disseminationAll participants will provide informed consent. The protocol has been approved by the Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Renji Hospital Ethics Committee (KY2019-191). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts, reports and presentations.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: ChiCTR1900027123. Registration date November 2019; first enrolment December 2019; expected end date December 2021; trial status: Ongoing.Brief A clinical trial for Stage III (PD-1+/MSI-H/EBV+/dMMR) gastric cancer patients who accepted anti-PD-1 therapy combined with docetaxel + S-1 as the first-line treatment and explored improvements in three-year disease-free survival rate.

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.

Although laparoscopic treatment for T1 gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been described previously, the differences in oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery for T2 GBC have not been investigated. We aimed to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery using retrospectively collected data for 81 patients with T2 GBC who underwent surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2017. Eligible patients were classified into “laparoscopic” and “open” groups. Propensity-score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The effects of surgery type on surgical and oncological outcomes were investigated. After propensity-score matching, 19 patients were included in the open and laparoscopic surgery groups. The median follow-up durations were 70 and 26 months in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The operative time (316.8 ± 80.3 vs. 218.9 ± 145.0 min, p = 0.016) and length of postoperative hospital stay (14.4 ± 6.0 vs. 8.4 ± 5.9 days, p = 0.004) were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. The three-year overall (86.3% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.660) and disease-free (76.4% vs. 60.2%, p = 0.448) survival rates were similar between the groups. Propensity-score matching showed that laparoscopic surgery for T2 GBC yielded similar long-term oncological outcomes and favorable short-term outcomes in comparison with open surgery. Laparoscopic treatment should be considered in patients with T2 GBC.

39 THE OUTCOMES OF MESENTERIC EXCISION FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY

Abstract We reported the esophagus, trachea, recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs), and regional lymph nodes are contained in a common compartment, which we named mesotracheoesophagus. We believe complete resection of the mesotracheoesophagus is ‘mesenteric excision’ for esophageal cancer, which is the fundamental principle of intestinal cancer surgery. Since June 2011, we have performed minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE) based on this concept. This study was aimed to evaluate outcomes of our MIE. Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE at our hospital between June 2011 and March 2019. Procedure First, the dorsal side of the esophagus was dissected along a dissectable layer recognized outside the mesotracheoesophagus. After complete mobilization of the dorsal side of the esophagus, the trachea and RLNs were released from the mesotracheoesophagus and the rest of the fat tissue was dissected for radical LN dissection in the upper mediastinum. Results We identified consecutive 151 eligible patients. The median age was 68 year-old (IQR 35–83) and 117 patients were male. Tumor location was Ce:Ut:Mt:Lt:Ae = 1:12:67:58:13. Histologic cell-type was squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC):adenocarcinoma = 142:9. The clinical stage (TNM 8th edition) was I:II:III:IVa = 45:39:56:2 and I:IIB:III:IVA = 2:1:5:1 in patients with SqCC and in those with adenocarcinoma, respectively. R0 resection was performed in all patients. The Clavian-Dindo classification grade III and higher RLN paralysis rate was 7.3% and the pneumonia 5.3%. The mortality rate was 1.3%. Three-year disease free survival rate was 62.3%. Three-year overall survival rate was 71.7%. Conclusion The outcomes of mesenteric excision for esophageal cancer surgery were acceptable. Video https://www.dropbox.com/s/y1lm3uurr4t86vq/2020%20ISDE%20Abstract.mov?dl=0.

Analysis of the relationship between preoperative serum tumor marker levels and tumor immune scores in patients with colorectal cancer based on nano-electrochemiluminescence

Surgery can be used to remove tumors from patients with colon cancer, but some patients have recurrence a short time after the tumor is surgically removed, and the disease-free survival (DFS) period is short. Therefore, if these high-risk patients can be identified as early as possible, appropriate treatment strategies can be formulated to reduce their postoperative recurrence rate. Tumor immune scores have been proven to be effective in predicting the prognosis of patients, but the scoring can only be performed after the tumor has been removed from the patient. There is still urgency to find indicators that can predict the prognosis of patients before surgery. We used electrochemiluminescence electrodes modified with nanomaterials to detect the expression of serum markers. After comparison, it was found that the contents of CEA, AFP, CA19-9, and CA125 in patients with CRC were substantially higher than those with benign colonic disease. Pearson correlation analysis showed that CEA, AFP, CA19-9, and CA125 contents are positive correlated to the patient’s tumor immune score. Further investigation found that patients with high expression of CEA, AFP, CA19-9, and CA125 had a three-year DFS rate, which was substantially lower than those with low expression. Therefore, our findings suggest that the use of the composite nano-modified electrode electrochemiluminescence method to detect the content of CEA, AFP, CA19-9, and CA125 in patients with colorectal cancer can predict DFS after surgery to a certain extent. Additionally, the perioperative data plan can be adjusted in time according to the expression of tumor markers before surgery.

P-166 Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy

In locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) is the standard care, aiming at downstaging and downsizing the tumor prior to potential radical surgery (1, 2). However, response to pCRT is highly variable, with only 8-20% of the patients exhibiting a complete pathological response (3). Surgical resection of the rectum may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Moreover, surgical resection may not lead to increased overall and disease-free survival in these patients. For this reason, we aimed to compare 2 groups of patients submitted to pCRT: one group without total clinical response therefore needing surgery (ypT0), and another with total clinical response, that did not need surgery (ycT0). Forty-six patients with rectal adenocarcinoma considered resectable were treated by pCRT. Complete and incomplete clinical responses were defined based on pelvic resonance magnetic, thoracic and abdominal tomography and endoscopic findings. Patients with incomplete clinical response were submitted to surgery resulting in stage ypT0. This group was compared to patients with complete clinical response with pCRT alone (ycT0) The statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using X2, Mann-Whitney U test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Three-year disease-free survival rate was 92.5%. In 13 patients (28.3%) complete clinical response was observed following pCRT (Non-surgical group). Thirty-three patients (71.7%) showed incomplete clinical response and were submitted to surgery. Anatomopathological results revealed ypT0N0M0 (Surgical group). Mean time until surgery was 10.7 weeks. There were no differences in patient demographics or tumor characteristics between groups. In the Surgical group, 18 definitive colostomies and 7 diverting temporary ileostomies were performed. Mean follow-up was 45.1 months in the Non-surgical group and 37.5 months in the Surgical group. There were 3 systemic recurrences and 1 endorectal recurrence in the Surgical group, with no recurrences in the Non-surgical group. Three patients in the Surgical group died of the disease. Two-year disease-free survival rates were 89.3% in the Surgical group and 100% in the Non-surgical group. Stage 0 rectal cancer disease is associated with excellent long-term results regardless of treatment strategy.

Referral for "Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy" for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer to a Multidisciplinary Board: Patterns, Management and Outcomes.

BackgroundUtilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer in everyday practice differs from that of clinical trials. We describe the patterns of referral for “neoadjuvant chemotherapy”, treatment and outcomes in a multidisciplinary tumor board.MethodsThis was an observational study. Patients referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy received 4 cycles of dose-dense gemcitabine/cisplatin and were then assessed for definitive local therapy. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Primary objective was a 3-year disease-free survival rate.ResultsForty-six patients (clinical stages II: 28, IIIA: 9, IIIB: 4, IVA: 3, missing: 2) were included. Following chemotherapy, 30 underwent radical cystectomy, 8 radiotherapy and 8 no further therapy. Pathological downstaging was observed in 14 (46.6%) of the 30 patients who underwent radical cystectomy; clinical TNM staging was correlated with disease-free survival in the whole population, while clinical and pathological stages, as well as pathological downstaging, were correlated with disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Three-year disease-free survival rates for the whole cohort and for patients undergoing radical cystectomy were 67.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51–79.2) and 65.2 (95% CI: 44.9–79.6), respectively.ConclusionReal-world muscle invasive bladder cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy are characterized by more advanced diseases and less frequent radical surgery than those included in clinical trials. Nevertheless, outcomes were comparable and, therefore, offering patients with stage II–IVA muscle invasive bladder cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy after assessment by multidisciplinary tumor boards should be strongly encouraged.

Real-World Effectiveness of Adjuvant Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Background: The real-world effectiveness of oxaliplatin in stage III colon cancer has not been determined in a large-scale population. We aimed to assess the real-world impact of adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment on the survival of these patients. Methods: Based on Taiwan cancer registry, we evaluated 17,801 patients with resected stage III colon cancer, including 14,168 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and 3,633 not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy as the control group between 2004 and 2014. We used the controlled interrupted time-series analysis to assess the three-year disease-free survival and five-year overall survival rates before (2004–2008) and after (2009–2014) the addition of oxaliplatin. Results: The introduction of oxaliplatin was associated with no significant improvement in the slopes (per half-year) of the three-year disease-free survival rate (0.2%, 95% CI: −1.7∼2.2%) and five-year overall survival rate (0.6%, 95% CI: −1.8∼3%). The patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy also showed no significant increase in the slopes (per half-year) of the three-year disease-free survival rate (0.6%, 95% CI: −1.4∼2.6%) and five-year overall survival rate (1%, 95% CI: −1.5∼3.5%). The nonsignificant results were consistent across subgroup analyses of age (<70 vs. ≥70 years), recurrence risk (T1-3 or N1 vs. T4 or N2), and cycle of oxaliplatin use (≤6 vs. >6). However, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly increased the slope (per half-year) of the five-year OS (2%, 95% CI: 0.2∼3.8%) for patients in the high-risk group (T4 or N2). The present results were robust in several sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Among real-world patients with stage III colon cancer, the introduction of oxaliplatin does not yield a significant improvement in survival. Future work should identify the subpopulation(s) of patients who benefit significantly from the addition of oxaliplatin.

The Impact of Radiotherapy Dose in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Objective: For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by planned esophagectomy is used as a curative treatment modality. However, the impact of radiotherapy dose remains undefined. Method: A total of 141 patients with stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC; as defined by the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer), receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy between 2000 and 2015 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, were retrospectively reviewed. The radiotherapy dose of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (36 Gy before 2009 and 50–50.4 Gy after 2009) and other clinicopathological parameters were collected and correlated with the response to chemoradiotherapy and treatment outcome. Result: Of these 141 patients, the radiotherapy dose was 36 Gy in 59 (42%) patients and 50 Gy in 82 (58%) patients. A complete pathological response was noted in 12 (20%) of 59 patients receiving 36 Gy radiotherapy, and 37 (45%) of 82 patients receiving 50 Gy radiotherapy (p = 0.002). The three-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 31% and 25% in patients receiving 36 Gy radiotherapy, and 54% and 46% in patients receiving 50–50.4 Gy radiotherapy, respectively (p = 0.023 for overall survival; p = 0.047 for disease-free survival). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher radiotherapy dose was associated with increased pathological complete response (p = 0.003, hazard ratio: 3.215), better overall survival (p = 0.024, hazard ratio: 1.585), and superior disease-free survival (p = 0.049, hazard ratio: 1.493). However, higher radiotherapy doses revealed more surgical complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.048) and anastomosis leaks (p = 0.004). Conclusion: For patients with locally advanced ESCC, preoperative chemoradiotherapy with higher radiotherapy doses led to increased pathologic complete response rates and improved survival.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Aims: This study aimed to examine the efficacy and toxicities of concomitant boost three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy along with multidrug chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) in neoadjuvant course for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).&#x0D; Study Design: A phase II interventional nonrandomized study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: This Study was conducted at Clinical Oncology and nuclear medicine department of Mansoura University Hospitals (Egypt) between November 2016 and October 2019.&#x0D; Methodology: Thirty patients (18 women, 12 men; age range 18-75 years) with (cT3-T4 and/or cN+) histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma located within 12 cm of the anal verge were included in this study. Patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to the pelvis of 45 Gy and a concomitant boost of 10 Gy to the primary tumor in 25 fractions, and concurrent with oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2 d1 weekly) and capecitabine (625 mg/m2 bid d1–5 weekly). Radical surgery was scheduled six to eight weeks after chemoradiation. Acute toxicities were recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) v5.0. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated using a binomial logistic regression. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Log-rank test.&#x0D; Results: All patients received chemoradiation. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical resection. Twenty-five patients underwent sphincter-sparing surgery (92.6%) and nine patients (33.3%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). The incidences of grade III neutropenia, diarrhea, and radiation dermatitis were 6.7%, 6.7%, 3.3% respectively. The three-year local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 7.4%, 63% and 74.1%, respectively. We found pre-surgical negative nodal status to be significantly associated with pCR (p=0.009). The pathological nodal stage was an independent prognostic factor to DFS.&#x0D; Conclusion: The combination of oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and dose escalation using concomitant boost 3DCRT is safely administrated in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma and it offers high pCR and sphincter preservation rate.

Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Outcomes in an Equal Access Military Setting.

IntroductionLung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a first-line treatment for early-stage lung cancer in non-surgical candidates or those who refuse surgery. We compared our institutional outcomes from a unique patient population with decreased barriers to care with a recently published prospective series.Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who received definitive lung SBRT at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center from 2015 to 2020. All patients underwent a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and all were presented at a multidisciplinary tumor board. Patients were treated on a Trubeam linear accelerator (LINAC)-based system with daily cone-beam CT. The results were qualitatively compared to outcomes from prospective studies including RTOG 0236 and RTOG 0618.ResultsA total of 105 patients with 114 lesions were included. Median age was 77 years and 54.7% had ≥ 40-pack year smoking history. 36.8% did not have pathologic confirmation. With a median follow-up of 24 months, three-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 92.4%, 81.0%, and 80.0%, respectively. Rates of Grade 1 and 2 toxicity were 21.9% and 6.7% and no patients experienced Grade ≥ 3 toxicity.ConclusionsIn our military setting with universal coverage and routine multidisciplinary care, lung SBRT provides outcomes comparable to prospective studies conducted at high-volume academic centers. More than one-third of patients were treated empirically without pathologic confirmation of disease, demonstrating a difference between clinical trials and community practice. Further investigation is warranted to integrate multidisciplinary management and achieve equal access to care to bridge existing health disparities in the community setting.

The comparison of FOLFOX regimens with different doses of 5-FU for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: a multicenter study.

We aim to compare the efficiency and toxicity of three different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration types in 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination treatment for adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC). Five hundred and seventy patients with stage III colorectal carcinoma who received different FOLFOX regimens after curative resection were included. Patients were divided into three groups as FOLFOX-4, modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6), and mFOLFOX-4 for comparison of toxicity and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Three-year DFS rates for FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-6, and mFOLFOX-4 groups were 65%, 72%, and 72%, respectively. Five-year OS rates for FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-6, and mFOLFOX-4 groups were 69%, 75%, and 67%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment groups in terms of DFS and OS (p = 0.079, and p = 0.147, respectively). Among grade 1-2 adverse events (AE), thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and stomatitis were more common in the mFOLFOX-6-treated group. The frequency of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting were similar in mFOLFOX-6 (36.3% and 24%, respectively) and mFOLFOX-4 (32.4% and 24.7%, respectively) groups but were higher than that in the FOLFOX-4 (19.5% and 11.3%, respectively) group. Among the most common grade 3-4 AE, neutropenia (53.4%, 9%, and 13.5%, respectively) and diarrhea (10.5%, 2.2%, and 2.4, respectively) were more common in FOLFOX-4. The rate of anemia and febrile neutropenia was similar in treatment groups (p = 0.063, and p = 0.210, respectively). In the adjuvant treatment of stage III CRC patients, three different 5-FU administration types in FOLFOX combination treatment can be used with similar efficiency and manageable toxicity.