Three-dimensional Phase-contrast MR Angiography Research Articles

4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: Effect of standard and blood‐pool contrast agents on SNR, PC‐MRA, and blood flow visualization

Time-resolved phase contrast (PC) MRI with velocity encoding in three directions (flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI) can be employed to assess three-dimensional blood flow in the entire aortic lumen within a single measurement. These data can be used not only for the visualization of blood flow but also to derive additional information on vascular geometry with three-dimensional PC MR angiography (MRA). As PC-MRA is sensitive to available signal-to-noise ratio, standard and novel blood pool contrast agents may help to enhance PC-MRA image quality. In a group of 30 healthy volunteers, the influence of different contrast agents on vascular signal-to-noise ratio, PC-MRA quality, and subsequent three-dimensional stream-line visualization in the thoracic aorta was determined. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI data acquired with contrast agent provided significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio in magnitude data and noise reduction in velocity data compared to measurements without contrast media. The agreement of three-dimensional PC-MRA with reference standard contrast-enhanced MRA was good for both contrast agents, with improved PC-MRA performance for blood pool contrast agent, particularly for the smaller supra-aortic branches. For three-dimensional flow visualization, a trend toward improved results for the data with contrast agent was observed.

Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries.

Our aim was to evaluate the effect of gadolinium chelates on image quality in phase-contrast MR angiography of renal arteries in patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis. In 24 patients, axial three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries was obtained on a 1.5-T MR imaging system before and after administration of gadolinium contrast agent. The improvement in distal renal artery signal-to-noise ratio after enhancement was measured and correlated with patient age, serum creatinine level, clinical estimation of renal artery flow, and the imaging parameter flip angle. On average, the distal renal artery signal-to-noise ratio increased 2.2-fold after gadolinium administration (p < .001). The increase was greatest in patients more than 60 years old (3.1-fold; p < .001) and in patients with serum creatinine levels greater than 3.0 mg/dl (4.3-fold; p < .01). After enhancement, we found an apparent increase in renal artery diameter (3.5 +/- 1.1 mm before enhancement versus 4.8 +/- 1.4 mm after enhancement [mean +/- SD; p < .001]). We believe this increase reflects improved visualization of slow blood flow along the artery wall. Although the visualization of renal arteries was better in most patients after enhancement, two patients had poorer image quality after enhancement because of increased venous signal obscuring the arteries. Gadolinium administration significantly increases distal renal artery signal-to-noise ratio on three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in most patients. The signal-to-noise ratio improvement is greatest in older patients and in patients with impaired renal function. However, in some cases, increased venous signal may obscure arteries.

MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences.

It has been reported and also has been our preliminary experience that many false ostial stenoses are attributable to a loss of signal intensity at the origin of the renal arteries when three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast MR angiography is used. Our objective was to add a 3D time-of-flight MR angiography sequence to the 3D phase-contrast MR angiography sequence to better analyze the origin of the main renal arteries. We assessed the value of the combination of these two MR angiography sequences for the depiction of renal artery stenosis. Forty-six patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis on the basis of clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory data were prospectively enrolled. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography findings were available for all patients. Using intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, we considered stenosis to be significant when the vessel was narrowed more than 50%. During MR angiography, half of the data were reconstructed by interpolation to avoid long acquisition times. Total acquisition times were less than 15 min. MR angiography findings were interpreted independently by two radiologists who were unaware of the findings of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. With 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, any cutoff in signal intensity or any narrowing of the vessel diameter of more than 50% from the renal ostium to the renal hilum was considered to represent significant stenosis. With 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, our image analysis was focused on the origin of the arteries. Any cutoff in signal intensity in the first centimeter of the renal artery was considered to represent significant stenosis. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography showed 105 renal arteries, including 15 supernumerary renal arteries. Eleven stenoses were localized to the main hilar renal arteries. Using time-of-flight MR angiography, we found that polar supernumerary renal arteries of small caliber and intrarenal branches of renal arteries were not adequately displayed. Using phase-contrast MR angiography to evaluate only whether the main hilar renal arteries were stenotic, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy to be 100%, 65%, 28%, 100%, and 69%, respectively. Using a combination of the two imaging sequences, we found that the specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were increased to 90%, 58%, and 92%, respectively. For detecting stenoses of the main renal arteries but not for visualizing small accessory renal arteries or distal branches, our results support the use of a combination of the two MR angiography sequences. For now, this combination of sequences should be viewed primarily as a technique for screening patients.

Evaluation of the renal arteries in kidney donors: value of three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with maximum-intensity-projection or surface rendering.

Donors routinely undergo preoperative conventional arteriography to evaluate the renal arteries before nephrectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the capability of three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiograms postprocessed with maximum-intensity-projection and surface-rendering techniques to show the renal arteries of potential donors. Postprocessed three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiograms of 17 patients were retrospectively reviewed by two experienced radiologists for the number and length of renal arteries visualized. Conventional arteriograms were used as the reference standard. Coronal maximum-intensity-projection and surface-rendered MR angiograms were also compared with each other with regard to the delineation of renal arteries from overlapping vessels. MR angiograms showed all 34 single or dominant renal arteries but only eight of 10 accessory arteries seen on conventional arteriograms. One of the nonvisualized accessory arteries was located within the imaged volume, and the other one arose from the distal aorta beyond the imaged regions. Five of six arterial branches arising from the proximal 30-mm portions of the renal arteries were seen on MR angiograms. Postprocessing with either maximum-intensity projection or surface-rendering showed the same number of renal arteries, although surface rendering separated overlapping veins from the renal arteries better than the maximum-intensity-projection technique. These results suggest that three-dimensional MR angiography is a reliable method of imaging single or dominant renal arteries, but not for showing all accessory renal arteries and small arterial branches. Surface rendering may provide specific advantages over maximum-intensity-projection in delineating renal arteries from overlapping vessels.

Two- and Three-Dimensional Phase Contrast MR Angiography of the Abdomen

Protocols for two- and three-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography of the major vessels in the abdomen were developed and demonstrated in healthy volunteers. Phase contrast imaging provides excellent suppression of stationary tissue signal and can be used to quantify the speed and direction of flow in a given vessel. The two-dimensional protocols provide rapid breath-held images, which proved useful for anatomical localization. The three-dimensional studies required longer acquisition times but provided superior image quality. Artifacts from bowel and respiratory motion were not significant with either protocol. Vasculature detected includes the renal, splenic, hepatic, and mesenteric systems as well as the aorta and inferior vena cava.

Three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in the head and neck: preliminary report.

Morbidity and possible mortality associated with contrast angiography lead to its cautious use. A noninvasive method for screening and further delineating known abnormalities would be welcomed. This article reviews the initial results and application of MR imaging to vascular imaging in the head and neck. By using the three-dimensional phase-sensitive method of Dumoulin, Souza, and collaborators, we acquired MR angiograms in 37 min and portrayed blood flow in all the major arteries and veins. Feeding arteries and draining veins of arteriovenous malformations were well delineated; aneurysms as small as 3-4 mm were shown, and obstructed cerebral vessels and the patency of a highly stenotic internal carotid artery were demonstrated. MR angiography of the head or neck offers great promise as a noninvasive means of studying vascular abnormalities.