Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Research Articles

Accuracy of Patient-Specific, 3D-Printed Laminofacetal Based Trajectory-Guide for Pedicle Screw Placement in Subaxial Cervical and Thoracic Spine.

Conventional methods of pedicle-screw placement have higher breach rates due to variations in pedicle trajectories. We studied the accuracy of patient-specific, three-dimensional (3D)-printed laminofacetal-based trajectory guide for pedicle-screw placement in the subaxial-cervical and thoracic spine. We enrolled 23 consecutive patients who underwent subaxial cervical and thoracic pedicle-screw instrumentation. They were divided into two groups: group A (cases without spinal deformity) and group B (cases with pre-existing spinal deformity). Patient-specific, 3D-printed laminofacetal-based trajectory guide for each instrumented level was designed. The accuracy of screw placement was assessed on postoperative computed tomography (CT) using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading. A total of 194 pedicle screws (114 cervical and 80 thoracics) were placed using trajectory guides, of which 102 belonged to group B (34 cervical and 68 thoracics). Out of a total of 194 pedicle screws, 193 had clinically acceptable placement (grade A: 187; grade B: 6; and grade C: 1). In the cervical spine, 110 pedicle screws out of a total of 114 had grade A placement (grade B: 4). In the thoracic spine, 77 pedicle screws out of a total of 80 had grade A placement (grade B: 2; grade C: 1). Out of a total of 92 pedicle screws in group A, 90 had grade A placement, and the rest 2 had grade B breach. Similarly, 97 out of a total of 102 pedicle screws in group B were placed accurately, 4 had grade B and another had a grade C breach. Patient-specific, 3D-printed laminofacetal-based trajectory guide may help in accurate placement of subaxial cervical and thoracic pedicle screws. It may help reduce surgical time, blood loss, and radiation exposure.

Is Anterior Release Obsolete or Does It Play a Role in Contemporary Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery? A Matched Pair Analysis.

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. The purpose of this study is to compare 3-dimensional correction associated with the anterior release (AR) and contemporary posterior instrumentation versus posterior-only surgery. The role of AR as a tool in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has seen a decline with the popularization of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. Five surgeons were queried for all surgical thoracic AIS cases from 2003 to 2010 treated with thoracoscopic AR/fusion and contemporary posterior instrumentation and fusion and thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation (>80% screws) with 2-year follow-up. These cases were then matched with posterior spinal fusion only cases from a multicenter prospective database. The 2 groups were matched on the basis of major curve magnitude within 5 degrees, T5-T12 kyphosis within 9 degrees, and angle of trunk rotation within 9 degrees. Radiographic and clinical parameters were compared for the 2 groups. Continuous variables were analyzed with analysis of variance and categorical dependent variables with the χ test. A total of 47 cases of AR were matched to 47 (1:1 match) posterior spinal fusion cases. Preoperative parameters were similar between groups (P>0.05). Postoperatively, AR cases had a lower major curve (20 vs. 25 degrees, P=0.034; 72% vs. 66% correction, P=0.037). T5-T12 kyphosis was greater in the AR cases (26 vs. 20 degrees; P=0.005). The angle of trunk rotation was similar for the groups. Anchor density was lower in the AR group (1.6 vs. 1.9; P<0.0001). There were 3 complications associated with the AR: 1 pneumothorax and 2 conversions to minithoracotomies for failure to maintain single lung ventilation. AR improves coronal and sagittal plane correction in contemporary AIS surgery with a satisfactory complication profile with less pedicle screw density required for clinically similar corrections. A further prospective study on the benefits of AR may help define specific indications.

Effectiveness of the Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement Using the Virtual Surgical Training System: A Cadaver Study.

The virtual simulation surgery has initially exhibited its promising potentials in neurosurgery training. To evaluate effectiveness of the Virtual Surgical Training System (VSTS) on novice residents placing thoracic pedicle screws in a cadaver study. A total of 10 inexperienced residents participated in this study and were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The group using VSTS to learn thoracic pedicle screw fixation was the simulation training (ST) group and the group receiving an introductory teaching session was the control group. Ten fresh adult spine specimens including 6 males and 4 females with a mean age of 58.5 yr (range: 33-72) were collected and randomly allocated to the 2 groups. After exposing anatomic structures of thoracic spine, the bilateral pedicle screw placement of T6-T12 was performed on each cadaver specimen. The postoperative computed tomography scan was performed on each spine specimen, and experienced observers independently reviewed the placement of the pedicle screws to assess the incidence of pedicle breach. The screw penetration rates of the ST group (7.14%) was significantly lower in comparison to the control group (30%, P<.05). Statistically significant difference in acceptable rates of screws also occurred between the ST (100%) and control (92.86%) group (P<.05). In addition, the average screw penetration distance in control group (2.37 mm±0.23 mm) was significantly greater than ST group (1.23 mm±0.56 mm, P<.05). The virtual reality surgical training of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation effectively improves surgical performance of novice residents compared to those with traditional teaching method, and can help new beginners to master the surgical technique within shortest period of time.

Can Right-Handed Surgeons Insert Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screws in much Comfortable Position? Right-Handedness Problem on the Left Side.

ObjectiveThoracic pedicles have special and specific properties. In particular, upper thoracic pedicles are positioned in craniocaudal plane. Therefore, manipulation of thoracic pedicle screws on the left side is difficult for right-handed surgeons. We recommend a new position to insert thoracic pedicle screw that will be much comfortable for spine surgeons. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent upper thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. In 15 patients, a total of 110 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the upper thoracic spine (T1–6) with classical position (anesthesiologist and monitor were placed near to patient’s head. Surgeons were standing classically near to patient’s body while patients were lying in prone position). In 18 patients, a total of 88 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the upper thoracic spine with the new standing position-surgeons stand by the head of the patient and the anesthesia monitor laterally and under patient’s belt level. All the operations performed by the same senior spine surgeons with the help of C-arm. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to assess the screw placement. The screw malposition and pedicle wall violations were divided and evaluated separately. Cortical penetration were measured and graded at either : 1–2 mm penetration, 2–4 mm penetration and >4 mm penetration. ResultsTotal 198 screws were inserted with two different standing positions. Of 198 screws 110 were in the classical positioning group and 88 were in the new positioning group. Incorrect screw placement was found in 33 screws (16.6%). The difference between total screw malposition by both standing positions were found to be statistically significant (p=0.011). The difference between total pedicle wall violations by both standing positions were found to be statistically significant (p=0.003). ConclusionRight-handedness is a problem during the upper thoracic pedicle screw placement on the left side. Changing the surgeon’s position standing near to patient’s head could provide a much comfortable position to orient the craniocaudal plane of the thoracic pedicles.

Cadaveric study for ideal dorsal pedicle screw entry point.

Objective:To determine the entry for the dorsal pedicular screw in relation to the notch present at the junction of base of the lateral margin of superior articular process with superior border of transverse process in dorsal spine. The advantage of this technique is a constant and easily identifiable entry point which does not involve partial resection of the inferior facet, thus maintaining stability and maintaining the well defined transverse and sagittal screw angles and decreasing the incidence of medial and inferior pedicle violation.Materials and Methods:The study was carried out using ten cadavers (four male and six female). Spinal column was dissected completely from cadavers. Before the experiment, normal anatomy was confirmed on all cadavers excluding cases of spinal deformity. Dissection was done by the spine surgeons taking care to preserve all the bony landmarks near the entry point. This study was carried out bilaterally on pedicles between the first and twelfth thoracic (T) vertebrae.Results:The relation of the superior articular notch and transverse process to the thoracic spine pedicles was studied. It was found that superior third of the pedicle was related to the superior articular notch and the transverse process in the first five thoracic vertebrae. The relation of these structures to the pedicle of the sixth thoracic vertebra was somewhat equally distributed between the superior and middle third of the pedicle. From the 7th to 12th thoracic vertebrae the superior articular process and transverse process were related to the middle third of the pedicle in almost all the cases. It is important to note that the inferior 1/3rd of the pedicle was not related to these landmarks at any of the levels.Conclusion:We conclude that the ideal pedicle entry point described here should be considered by surgeons during thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. The notch at the base of the superior articular process will always remain constant and therefore an important anatomical landmark in guiding the screw toward the entry of the pedicle.

Is in vivo manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation reliable?

Previous reports on the accuracy of manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw placement have been restricted to cadaveric studies. Authors of the present novel study assessed the accuracy of manual palpation for the detection of medial and lateral pedicle breaches during thoracic spine surgery in living adult humans. Pedicle tracks were created freehand and manually palpated using a ball-tipped probe. Postoperative CT scans of all implanted thoracic and L-1 screws were evaluated with respect to screw position and the pedicle wall. Five hundred twenty-five pedicle track/screw placements were compared. There were 21 pedicles with medial breaches measuring ≥ 2 mm. The surgeon correctly identified only 4 of these pedicle tracks as having a medial breach. The surgeon correctly identified 17 of 128 pedicles with a significant (≥ 2 mm) lateral breach. One hundred two screw placements had no measurable breach in any direction (medial, lateral, or foraminal). The surgeon correctly identified 98% of these ideally placed screws. In this real-time study of thoracic pedicle screw placement, the accuracy of manual palpation for detecting medial or lateral breaches that were ≥ 2 mm was disturbingly low. These findings are consistent with those in recent cadaveric evaluations of palpation accuracy and point to the critical need for more reliable alternative methods to assess pedicle integrity during the placement of thoracic pedicle screws for spine instrumentation surgery.

Anterior Release: Is it Obsolete or Does it Play a Role in Contemporary AIS Surgery?

The role of anterior release as a tool in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has seen a decline with the popularization of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation (TPS). Potential benefits of anterior release are improvement of coronal, sagittal, and axial plane correction.

Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection

Background contextThere is currently no reliable technique for intraoperative assessment of pedicle screw fixation strength and optimal screw size. Several studies have evaluated pedicle screw insertional torque (IT) and its direct correlation with pullout strength. However, there is limited clinical application with pedicle screw IT as it must be measured during screw placement and rarely causes the spine surgeon to change screw size. To date, no study has evaluated tapping IT, which precedes screw insertion, and its ability to predict pedicle screw pullout strength. PurposeThe objective of this study was to investigate tapping IT and its ability to predict pedicle screw pullout strength and optimal screw size. Study designIn vitro human cadaveric biomechanical analysis. MethodsTwenty fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebral levels were prepared and dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry scanned for bone mineral density (BMD). All specimens were osteoporotic with a mean BMD of 0.60±0.07 g/cm2. Five specimens (n=10) were used to perform a pilot study, as there were no previously established values for optimal tapping IT. Each pedicle during the pilot study was measured using a digital caliper as well as computed tomography measurements, and the optimal screw size was determined to be equal to or the first size smaller than the pedicle diameter. The optimal tap size was then selected as the tap diameter 1 mm smaller than the optimal screw size. During optimal tap size insertion, all peak tapping IT values were found to be between 2 in-lbs and 3 in-lbs. Therefore, the threshold tapping IT value for optimal pedicle screw and tap size was determined to be 2.5 in-lbs, and a comparison tapping IT value of 1.5 in-lbs was selected. Next, 15 test specimens (n=30) were measured with digital calipers, probed, tapped, and instrumented using a paired comparison between the two threshold tapping IT values (Group 1: 1.5 in-lbs; Group 2: 2.5 in-lbs), randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle on each specimen. Each pedicle was incrementally tapped to increasing size (3.75, 4.00, 4.50, and 5.50 mm) until the threshold value was reached based on the assigned group. Pedicle screw size was determined by adding 1 mm to the tap size that crossed the threshold torque value. Torque measurements were recorded with each revolution during tap and pedicle screw insertion. Each specimen was then individually potted and pedicle screws pulled out “in-line” with the screw axis at a rate of 0.25 mm/sec. Peak pullout strength (POS) was measured in Newtons (N). ResultsThe peak tapping IT was significantly increased (50%) in Group 2 (3.23±0.65 in-lbs) compared with Group 1 (2.15±0.56 in-lbs) (p=.0005). The peak screw IT was also significantly increased (19%) in Group 2 (8.99±2.27 in-lbs) compared with Group 1 (7.52±2.96 in-lbs) (p=.02). The pedicle screw pullout strength was also significantly increased (23%) in Group 2 (877.9±235.2 N) compared with Group 1 (712.3±223.1 N) (p=.017). The mean pedicle screw diameter was significantly increased in Group 2 (5.70±1.05 mm) compared with Group 1 (5.00±0.80 mm) (p=.0002). There was also an increased rate of optimal pedicle screw size selection in Group 2 with 9 of 15 (60%) pedicle screws compared with Group 1 with 4 of 15 (26.7%) pedicle screws within 1 mm of the measured pedicle width. There was a moderate correlation for tapping IT with both screw IT (r=0.54; p=.002) and pedicle screw POS (r=0.55; p=.002). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that tapping IT directly correlates with pedicle screw IT, pedicle screw pullout strength, and optimal pedicle screw size. Therefore, tapping IT may be used during thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation as an adjunct to preoperative imaging and clinical experience to maximize fixation strength and optimize pedicle “fit and fill” with the largest screw possible. However, further prospective, in vivo studies are necessary to evaluate the intraoperative use of tapping IT to predict screw loosening/complications.

A prospective study on the use of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) for image-guided placement of thoracic pedicle screws

Background. Placement of thoracic pedicle screws is a technically demanding procedure. The risk of thoracic pedicle breaches range from 6.5 to 41%. Current image guidance systems consist of computer based systems utilizing preoperative CT scans or 2D/3D intraoperative fluoroscopy. Objective. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and accuracy of a new intraoperative CT (iCT) based image guidance system for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. Methods. We prospectively studied the use of iCT for the first 43 consecutive cases for which thoracic pedicle screws were inserted as part of the instrumentation for spinal fusion between April 2008 and July 2011. In every case, a post-instrumentation intraoperative check CT was done before wound closure to assess accuracy of implant placement. Outcomes were analysed with regards to the incidence of pedicle wall violations detected on intraoperative check CT imaging, and the rate of immediate intraoperative revision of misplaced screws. Pedicle violations were graded according to an established classification system, Results. A total of 261 thoracic pedicle screws (T1–T12) were inserted in 43 patients (age range 13–83). Mean follow-up was 12 months. There were 7 (2.7%) pedicle violations detected on the intraoperative check CT. Out of the seven, three were grade I (< 2 mm), two were grade II (2–4 mm) and rest two were grade III (> 4 mm) violations. Only four of the screws (1.5%) that breached the pedicle wall by more than 2 mm were immediately revised before wound closure. Conclusion. The iCT based spinal neuronavigation system allowed for highly safe and accurate placement (97.3%) of thoracic pedicle screws in our institution with no neurovascular injury reported.

Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

Retrospective review. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve and associated evolution in surgical technique with thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Common treatment for AIS now includes posterior spinal fusion, using thoracic pedicle screws (TPS). It is critical to assess the efficacy, safety profile, and learning curve associated with this technique as its use becomes more widespread among inexperienced surgeons. Retrospective review of the senior author's first 96 TPS cases for Lenke Type I AIS curves. Multiple regression techniques were used to discern whether increasing case number (CN) was associated with improved perioperative and 2-year minimum radiographic and clinical outcomes. The 96 cases were divided into 4 equal quartiles of 24 cases/group (i.e., Q1-Q4) and compared using analysis of variance measures. A total of 1169 thoracic pedicle screws were placed in 96 patients. We found a significant correlation between CN and major curve correction at 2 years (P < 0.0001), inverse correlation between CN and length of stay (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.03), but no differences in cell saver or complications. Univariate analysis revealed significant inverse correlations between increasing CN and transfusion rate (P = 0.02) and operative times (P = 0.0001). Total number of screws placed (Q1:9.4 vs. Q4:16.2, P < 0.0001) and number of screws/level (Q1:0.98 vs. Q4:1.64, P < 0.0001) increased linearly with increasing CN, whereas the average time for screw placement (Q1:24.2 vs. Q4:11.4 minutes, P < 0.0001) and ability to maintain T2-T12 kyphosis decreased (Q1:0.21 vs. Q4:-5.5 P = 0.02) with increasing CN. There is a significant learning curve associated with thoracic pedicle screw placement in AIS. We describe several technical steps that can be taken to increase the safety of screw placement at the beginning of the learning curve. Inexperienced surgeons should expect a gradual improvement over time in radiographic and clinical outcomes.

The safety of pedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine

Thoracic pedicle screw fixation has many advantages over other methods of spinal fixation in treating various conditions. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine. We retrospectively reviewed 144 patients (65 males, 79 females; mean age 38 years; range 9 to 82 years) who underwent posterior thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 827 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the thoracic spine (T1-12) by the same senior spine surgeon using the free-hand technique. Indications for thoracic spine surgery were deformities (n=47, 32.6%), metastatic or primary tumors (n=15, 10.4%), spinal infections (n=7, 4.9%), degenerative diseases (n=13, 9%), and spinal trauma (n=62, 43.1%). Screw containment was assessed by three independent reviewers on postoperative plain radiographs. In addition, thin-slice computed tomography scans were obtained in 21 suspected cases (29 screws). Screw containment was found in 94.3% (780 screws). Incorrect screw placement was found in 47 screws (5.7%), including 31 screws (3.8%) demonstrated by plain radiographs, and 16 screws (1.9%) demonstrated by thin-slice computed tomography scans. More than half of the faulty screws (n=24, 51.1%) were detected in scoliosis patients, especially on the concave side of the curvature (83.3%). The most frequent site of faulty screw placement was the T8 level (21.3%). No symptoms or complications occurred related to faulty screw placement. The high accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement (94.3%) using the free-hand technique suggests that pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic spine is safe, reliable, and useful in the treatment of all types of spinal diseases.

P140. Traditional Hybrid vs. Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Matched Pair Analysis of Clinical Radiographic and Pulmonary Outcomes

P140. Traditional Hybrid vs. Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Matched Pair Analysis of Clinical Radiographic and Pulmonary Outcomes

The Successful Short-term Treatment of Flexion-distraction Injuries of the Thoracic Spine Using Posterior-only Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

In this retrospective study, the results of treating unstable flexion-distraction injuries (FDI) of the thoracic spine with posterior-only thoracic pedicle screw (P/TPS) instrumentation were investigated. The objective was to determine the ability of P/TPS to correct and maintain the focal kyphosis of the injured spine. Clinical outcome and complications of the surgical procedure were also a focus of the study. The treatment of FDI of the thoracic spine remains controversial. There continues to be difficulty in maintaining the corrected kyphosis angle regardless of the surgical approach used. Eighteen patients with FDI of thoracic spine who underwent P/TPS were identified. The initial and corrected focal kyphosis was evaluated radiographically. Failure of treatment was defined as a >5-degree progression of corrected kyphosis from initial to latest follow-up. Clinical evaluation included complication rate, Injury Severity Score, and Frankel grade. Of the 18 eligible patients, 15 (83%) had adequate follow-up for evaluation. The mean length of follow-up care was 16.1 months. The average Injury Severity Score was 23. The average number of instrumented levels was 6.8. The focal kyphosis of the injury was reduced from a mean of 19.60 to 5.73 degrees (P<0.001), with an average progression of only 2.27 degrees (P=0.128) at final follow-up. Complications were limited to wound infections and occurred in 2 study participants. Neurologic status returned to normal in all patients with incomplete cord injuries. FDI of the thoracic spine may be amendable to a uniform surgical approach with P/TPS. This procedure carried a relatively low complication rate and allowed for reduction and restoration of the posterior tension band with a biomechanically rigid construct.

Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique

Previously, we described the ideal pedicle entry point (IPEP) for the thoracic spine at the base of the superior facet at the junction of the lateral one third and medial two thirds with the freehand technique on cadavers. Here we measured the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement (Chung et al. Int Orthop 2008) on post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans in 43 scoliosis patients who underwent operation with the freehand technique taking the same entry point. Of the 854 inserted screws, 268 (31.3%) were displaced; 88 (10.3%) and 180 (21.0%) screws were displaced medially and laterally, respectively. With regard to the safe zone, 795 screws were within the safe zone representing an accuracy rate of 93%; 448 and 406 thoracic screws inserted in adolescent idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis showed an accuracy of 89.9 and 94%, respectively (p = 0.6475). The accuracy rate of screws inserted in the upper, middle and lower thoracic pedicles were 94.2, 91.6 and 93.7%, respectively (p = 0.2411). The results indicate that IPEP should be considered by surgeons during thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation.

The Ponte Procedure

Case series. To examine a consecutive series of surgically treated Scheuermann kyphosis that had a posterior only procedure with segmental pedicle screw fixation and segmental Ponte osteotomies. The gold standard for surgical treatment of Scheuermann kyphosis (a rigid kyphosis associated with wedged vertebral bodies occurring in late childhood or adolescence) has been combined anterior and posterior approach surgery. Alberto Ponte has advocated a posterior-only procedure with posterior column shortening via segmental osteotomies, but his procedure has not been widely accepted owing to concerns that without anterior column support there would be a risk of correction loss and/or instrumentation failure. With the advent of improved spinal instrumentation and fixation with thoracic pedicle screws, the Ponte procedure may offer an advantage over anterior/posterior reconstruction. The study prospectively enrolled 17 consecutive patients with Scheuermann kyphosis who were treated with the Ponte procedure by the senior surgeon at one institution. Standardized radiographic analysis was performed and included full-length coronal and sagittal radiographs preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Analysis also included the correction obtained through the most severe, wedged segments of the deformity by the osteotomies. Seventeen patients had the Ponte procedure satisfactorily performed. No patient needed an anterior approach to achieve sufficient correction or fusion. There were no reoperations for nonunion or instrumentation failure. Correction of the instrumented levels was 61% and of worst Cobb was mean 49%. The apex of the deformity was measured over the most deformed 3 to 7 wedged segments. The average correction across the apex was 9.3 degrees per osteotomy (range 5.9 to 15). No patient lost more than 4 degrees of correction through their instrumented and fused levels. There were no neurologic complications. There was one late infection with a solid fusion treated with instrumentation removal and intravenous antibiotics. Using thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation as the primary anchor, the Ponte procedure was successfully performed in 17 consecutive patients for Scheuermann kyphosis with no exclusions for the size or rigidity of the kyphosis. Results were as good as anterior/posterior historical controls with excellent correction and minimal loss of correction at final follow-up. This procedure avoids the morbidity and extended operative time attributed to the anterior approach. Therapeutic study, level IV [case series (no, or historical, control group)].

Prospective Pulmonary Function Comparison Following Posterior Segmental Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Prospective clinical study. To investigate if a correlation exists between various parameters including major thoracic curve correction and postoperative pulmonary function test (PFT) improvement at 2 years postoperative following posterior segmental spinal fusion (PSSF) and instrumentation with iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). There are no studies available on the correlation between major thoracic curve correction and postoperative PFT improvement following PSSF and instrumentation with ICBG with a homogenous diagnosis, similar operation method, and similar age population. One hundred thirty-nine patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke type 1-4), undergoing PSSF and instrumentation with ICBG at a single institution, were before surgery and 2 years after surgery prospectively evaluated in regard to PFTs, assessing forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. PFTs change at 2 years postoperative was compared by the various parameters including major thoracic Cobb curve correction and the types of instrumentation. We defined a significant clinical improvement as a 10% or more increase of percent predictive FEV1 value at 2 years postoperative. PSSF and instrumentation with ICBG demonstrated statistically significant improvement of absolute and percent-predicted PFTs at 2 years postoperative. There was a significant clinical improvement in 31 patients (22%) at 2 years postoperative. Significant clinical improvement was related to thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation (vs. thoracic hook instrumentation, P = 0.030). Absolute amount of major thoracic Cobb correction, magnitude of the residual curve, correction percentage of the major thoracic Cobb, the number of fused vertebrae, Risser sign, and age at surgery did not demonstrate any significant positive or negative correlation (-0.3 <Pearson correlation coefficient <0.3). Patients having a PSSF and instrumentation with ICBG statistically significant improvement of absolute and percent-predicted PFTs at 2 years postoperative. There was a significant clinical improvement in 31 patients (22%) at 2 years postoperative. A significant clinical improvement was related with thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation.

Comparison of Thoracic Pedicle Screw to Hook Instrumentation for the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity

Retrospective, case-control, matched cohort. Compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of adult spinal deformity patients treated with thoracic pedicle screw (TPS) or thoracic hook constructs. The efficacy of TPS instrumentation for pediatric spinal deformity correction has been established. Little is known about TPS use in adult spinal deformity. Fifty-six patients (average age, 49 years; average follow-up, 3.58 years) were treated with TPS or thoracic hook constructs for coronal (n = 20) or sagittal (n = 36) plane deformities. Patients were evaluated radiographically and with SRS scores. Coronal deformities treated with TPS demonstrated improved main thoracic curve correction compared with hook constructs at last follow-up (24.8 degrees vs. 13.8 degrees; P < 0.05), despite having larger (59.8 degrees vs. 44.9 degrees; P < 0.05) and more rigid preoperative curves (29.3% vs. 44.9% correction on side-bending radiographs; P < 0.001). Sagittal deformities treated with TPS constructs demonstrated greater thoracolumbar kyphosis correction than hook constructs at last follow-up (12.1 degrees vs. 2.5 degrees; P < 0.05). No TPS patient had a thoracic pseudarthrosis. Four hook patients (14%) had thoracic pseudarthroses. TPS instrumentation allows greater coronal and sagittal plane correction and may reduce the risk of thoracic pseudarthrosis compared with hook constructs when treating adult spinal deformities.

The Safety of Fluoroscopically-Assisted Thoracic Pedicle Screw Instrumentation For Spine Trauma

Pedicle screw fixation is considered biomechanically superior to other stabilization constructs. However, the potential for severe complications have discouraged its use in the thoracic spine. Our goal is to determine the incidence of major perioperative complications following the placement of thoracic pedicle screws using anatomic landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients with spine fractures. Retrospective review of 245 consecutive patients with spine fractures requiring pedicle screw fixation between T1 and T10 at a regional Level I trauma center between 1995 and 2001. Database and medical record review were used to identify the incidence of major perioperative complications. A major complication was defined as a potentially life-threatening vascular injury, neurologic deterioration, pneumothorax or hemothorax, and tracheoesophageal injury. Patients were monitored for these complications from the time of surgery until discharge. In all, 1,533 pedicle screws were placed between T1 and T10 in 245 patients. No patient sustained a major complication related to screw placement. Three patients (1.2%) required a secondary procedure for prophylactic revision of four (0.26%) malpositioned screws. This study supports the safety of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine using preoperative imaging evaluation, standard posterior element landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Anatomy and biomechanics of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation

Anatomy and biomechanics of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation