Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair For Acute Type Research Articles

Abstract 2009: Computational Modeling Of Long-term Aortic Root Dilatation Following TEVAR Of Type B Aortic Dissection

Objectives: The long-term sequalae of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are poorly understood. While several failure modes have been identified, the hemodynamic impact of TEVAR in the proximal native ascending aorta has yet to be fully appreciated. This study applies computational modeling tools to investigate a case of long-term aortic root dilatation following TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Methods: We investigate a patient who presented with heart failure 4.5 years after initially successful TEVAR. Cross-sectional aortic root diameter was measured in a pre-operative scan and 57 months post-TEVAR. Three-dimensional localized surface dilatation was calculated using pre-operative and post-operative segmentations, followed by a non-rigid surface mapping method of calculating area change in corresponding regions. The hemodynamic impact of TEVAR on the proximal aorta was analyzed with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of the post-operative patient geometry. Results: Aortic root diameter increased from 39.2 mm pre-op to 47.1 mm (+ 20.1%) postop and 34.9 mm preop to 40.8 mm (+ 16.9%) postop on axial and coronal images respectively. The three-dimensional area mapping between pre and post-op scans demonstrates a maximum 14% area increase near the aortic root. The CFD simulations show increased velocity and static pressure in the ascending aorta near the aortic root region. Conclusions: Three different computational approaches demonstrate long-term changes in ascending aortic morphology following TEVAR. Computed tomography measurements demonstrate significant aortic root dilatation, and three-dimensional surface mapping shows increasing area in the proximal ascending aorta. The CFD results emphasize localization of increased velocity and stress in the same region. These observations point to potential avenues for further mechanistic investigation.

Readmission after thoracic endovascular aortic repair following blunt thoracic aortic injury.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly utilized to treat blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), but post-discharge outcomes remain underexplored. We examined 90-day readmission in patients treated with TEVAR following BTAI. Adult patients discharged alive after TEVAR for BTAI in the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2016 and 2019 were included. Outcomes examined were 90-day non-elective readmission, primary readmission reasons, and 90-day mortality. As a complementary analysis, 90-day outcomes following TEVAR for BTAI were compared with those following TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD). We identified 2085 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI. The median age was 43years (IQR, 29-58), 65% of all patients had an ISS ≥ 25, and 13% were readmitted within 90days. The main primary causes for readmission were sepsis (8.8%), wound complications (6.7%), and neurological complications (6.5%). Two patients developed graft thrombosis as primary readmission reasons. Compared with acute TBAD patients, BTAI patients had a significantly lower rate of readmission within 90days (BTAI vs. TBAD; 13% vs. 29%; p < .001). We found a significant proportion of readmission in patients treated with TEVAR for BTAI. However, the 90-day readmission rate after TEVAR for BTAI was significantly lower compared with acute TBAD, and the common cause for readmission was not related to residual aortic disease or vascular devices. This represents an important distinction from other patient populations treated with TEVAR for acute vascular conditions. Elucidating differences between trauma-related TEVAR readmissions and non-traumatic indications better informs both the clinician and patients of expected post-discharge course. Level of evidence/study type: IV, Therapeutic/care management.

Standing the test of time: total aortic remodeling 13 years after TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection

Long-term outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD) is still underreported in current literature. This case report shows persistence of aortic remodeling without secondary complication or need of reintervention 13 years after TEVAR. A 45-year-old woman was referred to the emergency room with aTBAD. Due to early diameter progression in combination with therapy-refractory pain and uncontrolled hypertension, TEVAR was performed. Hereafter, the patient showed complete remodeling of the descending thoracic aorta without persistent false lumen perfusion in this segment and with stable true and false lumen diameter in the untreated abdominal segment for a 13-year period. No aortic-related reintervention was needed. With contemporary devices and adapted therapy, TEVAR seems able to treat complex thoracic disease. Long-term follow-up (FU) is mandatory to monitor the efficacy and durability of endovascular treatment in aortic disease.

The Safety and Efficacy of Extended TEVAR in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with endograft coverage from the left subclavian artery to the celiac artery has been hypothesized to increase spinal cord ischemia. This study analyzes the impact of extended coverage on adverse outcomes and aortic remodeling in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). From January 2012 to October 2018, 91 patients underwent TEVAR for aTBAD. Median follow-up was 3.1 (interquartile range, 1.2-4.9) years and was complete in 94% of patients. The extent of aortic endograft coverage was categorized as standard (n= 39) or extended (n= 52). Contrast-enhanced imaging scans were analyzed to determine length of coverage, maximum aortic diameters, and false lumen (FL) status. The mean age was 52.6 ± 13.9 years, and 66% were men. The most common indications for intervention were malperfusion (42%) and refractory pain (34%). Thirteen (14%) patients required a lumbar drain (preoperative: n= 3; postoperative: n= 10). Mean duration between scans was 2.0 ± 1.9 years. Length of aortic coverage was significantly longer in the extended group (241.7 ± 29.2 mm vs 180.8 ± 22.3 mm in the standard group; P < .001). In-hospital and overall mortality were 6% and 11%, respectively. There were no cases of paraplegia, and the incidence of spinal cord ischemia was 3%. After TEVAR, there was a higher incidence of FL obliteration or thrombosis at the distal descending thoracic aorta in the extended group (53% vs 16% in the standard group; P= .004). Extended TEVAR carries a low risk of spinal cord ischemia and improves FL remodeling of the descending thoracic aorta in patients with aTBAD. This strategy may decrease the need for reinterventions on the thoracic aorta in the chronic phase of TBAD.

Initial Experience of Modified Four-Branched Graft Technique and Antegrade TEVAR in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

We report the initial experience of modified four-branched graft technique for proximal aorta and arch repair, feasibly combined with antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to extend distal aortic reconstruction in acute type A aortic dissection. From 2011 to 2013, 12 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection were indicated for arch surgery and underwent surgical replacement of proximal aorta, arch replacement or debranching procedure, and concomitant TEVAR for distal aortic repair. A good surgical field was obtained in all patients. No major complications developed but two hospital deaths were attributed to end-organs damage preoperatively. Good and fast remodeling of thoracic descending aorta was demonstrated in 11 patients in postoperative CT imaging and no aneurysmal dilatation of visceral aorta had been observed in 10 patients during follow-up periods. Modified four-branched graft technique facilitated proximal aorta and arch repair, and provided excellent neurological outcome and favorable short-term results. Single-stage operation combined with antegrade TEVAR is feasible and effective to extend the repair down to the descending aorta, and thus achieved good remodeling of thoracic descending aorta.

Outcomes and Morphologic Changes of Immediate Type Ia Endoleak following Endovascular Repair of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

The clinical significance of immediate type Ia endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysms has been described in detail. However, this phenomenon is still controversial in TEVAR patients treated for acute type B aortic dissection. A single-institution study was conducted in 81 prospectively evaluated patients treated between January 2012 and June 2012 for acute type B aortic dissection. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) images were analyzed using 3-dimensional reconstruction to measure the areas and indices of the true lumen, false lumen, and total aorta in the proximal, middle, and distal descending thoracic aorta. Data were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups of patients, with and without immediate type Ia endoleaks. The average follow-up period was 12 months (range 10-13 months) after the procedure. TEVAR was successfully performed in all patients (mean age 53 years; 86% men). Thirty-six of the 81 patients were diagnosed with complicated type B dissection, including persistent pain (19/36, 52.7%), refractory hypertension (4/36, 11.1%), and end-organ ischemia (13/36, 36.1%). Of all the patients, 37 (45.7%) were diagnosed with immediate type Ia endoleaks. The differences between the 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality rates between the 2 groups were nonsignificant (13.5% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.08; 16.2% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.13). No stroke or paraplegia occurred during the follow-up. Reintervention was performed in 2 patients for delayed type I endoleaks in the group without immediate type Ia endoleaks. Pre- and postoperative CTA images were available for analysis in 54 patients. Among them, 24 patients had type Ia endoleaks. Patients with immediate type Ia endoleaks had a significantly larger preoperative distal false lumen area (498 ± 274 vs. 284 ± 213 mm(2), P = 0.02) and a larger distal aortic area (759 ± 275 vs. 624 ± 185 mm(2), P = 0.03). The 1-year follow-up CTA demonstrated significantly smaller true lumen indices and larger false lumen areas and false lumen indices in the proximal, middle, and distal sections in patients with immediate type Ia endoleaks. Differences in the postoperative morphological changes of the whole descending thoracic aorta were significant between the 2 groups, with the maximum area and the proximal, middle, and distal regions involved. The occurrence of endoleaks and the rates of postoperative false lumen thrombosis throughout the length of stent grafts were not significant at 1-year follow-up. The majority of immediate type Ia endoleaks following TEVAR in acute type B aortic dissections could seal spontaneously, without additional procedures needed. However, the appearance of such complications could be a risk factor of poorer aortic remodeling. Careful surveillance is recommended more frequently in patients with immediate type Ia endoleaks.