Taking Profits, Making MythsThe Slave Trading Career of Nathan Bedford Forrest Timothy S. Huebner (bio) The men engaged in the slave-trade between the states pass without condemnation, and their business is deemed honorable. —Frederick Douglass, 1852 Although best known as a Confederate general and early leader of the Ku Klux Klan, Nathan Bedford Forrest first made a name for himself during the 1850s, buying and selling enslaved African Americans in Memphis, Tennessee.1 Conforming to one scholar’s definition of “the most important type of [End Page 42] slave trader,” Forrest “bought slaves in the exporting states, transported them to the importing states, and sold them for a profit.” Existing studies of the trade focus mostly on earlier decades or rely heavily on sources from the much larger New Orleans market. An examination of a single prominent trader in late antebellum Memphis, a smaller urban center, yields further insights into the men who actually engaged in slave trading, as well as the pervasive hold that slavery’s capitalism had on the American South. Building on the innovative business practices established by an earlier generation of Southern traders, Forrest proved ruthlessly adept in running a profitable slave-dealing operation in the heart of the Lower Mississippi Valley.2 [End Page 43] The myths associated with Forrest’s biography obscure this part of his life, for during the postwar years the former Confederate general personally crafted a narrative to justify his antebellum business enterprises. In the immediate aftermath of accusations that Forrest had massacred Black Union soldiers at the April 1864 Battle of Fort Pillow, Forrest’s prewar slave trading emerged as an issue of particular interest in the North. A May 1864 article in the Chicago Daily Tribune described Forrest’s Memphis slave pen as “a perfect horror to all negroes far and near.” According to the Tribune, Forrest and his brother John disciplined “refractory slaves” with “long heavy bull whips,” which “cut up their victims until the blood trickled to the ground.” Forrest whipped one enslaved man to death, according to the article, after which “the slave was secretly buried, and the circumstance was only known to the slaves of the prison, who only dared to refer to the circumstance in whispers.”3 In 1868, after the war had ended, Forrest sought to rehabilitate his reputation by collaborating with Gen. Thomas Jordan, a Confederate veteran, and J. P. Pryor, a journalist, in producing an authorized biography. In the book’s introductory biographical sketch, Jordan and Pryor noted that Forrest moved to Memphis to establish himself “as a broker in real estate and a dealer in slaves,” and observed that Forrest “accumulated a considerable fortune.” Not content with this factual description, the authors—surely at Forrest’s urging—included a lengthy footnote arguing that Forrest “carried on his business with admitted probity and humanity.” The authors claimed that as a slave dealer Forrest “never sold separately the members of a family, and made it a rule, as far as practicable, after acquiring heads of a family, to purchase the others, howsoever widely scattered, and this, indeed, proved profitable in the end.”4 These words set the tone for later generations of [End Page 44] Forrest admirers, who offered similar justifications for his extensive trafficking in human beings. In 1898, one enthusiast went so far as to claim that Forrest gained such a reputation for kindness among the prewar enslaved community that he “was overwhelmed with applications from a great many [slaves], who begged him to purchase them.”5 Such arguments about Forrest’s benevolent motivations and actions—despite betraying a fundamental misunderstanding [End Page 45] of how the trade actually worked—endure even today in popular biographies and on neo-Confederate websites.6 Click for larger view View full resolution After the war, Forrest sought to rehabilitate his reputation by collaborating with General Thomas Jordan and J. P. Pryor in producing an authorized biography. This was the first source to portray Forrest as a benevolent trader. Myths have persisted as well due to the relative dearth of source material from this period in Forrest’s life. No records from his slave-trading business survive, so one must piece together...
Read full abstract