Third-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Research Articles

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Bulgaria in the New Millennium: Identification of Directions for Improvement in Management and Outcomes Reporting

Background: In the last two decades, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and advances in molecular diagnostics have revolutionized management and long-term clinical outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Real-world data from different countries allow for the identification of country-specific issues in the clinical management and development of specific plans for improvement. Here, we aimed to analyze the trend in overall survival in Bulgarian CML patients since 2000. Methods: We retrieved publicly available Bulgarian CML data from several sources such as the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry, Bulgarian National Statistical Institute, and National Health Insurance Fund since 2000. We used the retrieved data of a total of 1513 Bulgarian CML patients to describe the trends in overall survival (OS), conditional overall survival, life expectancy, and life years lost over five time periods. We also described the trends in healthcare expenditures for TKIs and CML patients’ coverage with TKIs since 2014. Results: In both uni- and multivariate models, we found a constant increase in OS over the three 5-year periods until 2014. The period 2015–2019 was not associated with an additional increase in OS. Identical dynamics in the improvement in life expectancy (LE) and in life years lost (LYLs) was observed. Additionally, conditional 5-year survival did not improve during 2015–2019 in comparison to 2010–2014. Population-level data did not show consistent changes in the documented number of deaths due to CML since 2013. The period after 2013 is marked by a constant increase in the annual expenditures for TKIs, reaching to about 2.0 EUR/capita. The number of patients who received at least one TKI also increased during that period. Conclusions: After the initial significant improvement in the clinical outcomes for Bulgarian CML patients until 2014, subsequent periods did not bring further benefit in spite of the improved coverage with second- and third-line TKIs. Multiple factors may contribute to these suboptimal outcomes. Therefore, one can propose several additional measures at the country level, which could lead to additional improvement in the OS of Bulgarian CML patients.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Across Three Lines of Therapy in Patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first- and second-line treatment for advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes in patients with ALK+ NSCLC receiving third-line ALK TKI versus non-ALK-directed therapy. Flatiron Health OncoEMR data were extracted for patients with ALK+ NSCLC initiating first-line ALK TKI between January 2015 and March 2022 followed by second-line ALK TKI and third-line ALK TKI (groupA) or non-TKI therapy (groupB). Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate modelling. Among patients receiving third-line ALK TKI (A, n = 85) or non-TKI therapy (B, n = 43), most received first-line crizotinib (A/B: 64%/60%) and second-line alectinib (36%/30%), ceritinib (24%/19%), or lorlatinib (15%/30%). Common third-line treatments were lorlatinib/alectinib (41%/33%) in A and immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + immunotherapy (30%/28%/21%) in B. GroupA versus B had longer TTD of first-line treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93; p = 0.020) and second-line treatment (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.33-0.75; p < 0.001) and longer OS from start of first-line treatment (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.19-0.54; p < 0.001) and second-line treatment (HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). For third-line treatment, median TTD (A/B) was 6.2/2.4months (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.37-1.00; p = 0.049) and OS was 17.6/6.5months (HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.042). Patients receiving third-line non-ALK-directed therapy had suboptimal outcomes on prior TKIs. Patients with longer duration of prior ALK TKI treatment appeared to benefit from third-line ALK TKIs.

Treatment failure with first line imatinib for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in Kenya vs high-income countries.

e19068 Background: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) occurs in all age groups but predominantly in adults. The disease pathogenesis is typified by the presence of BCR-ABL fusion protein coded for by BCR-ABL gene, a product of reciprocal translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 denoted: t(9;22)(q34;q11). This results in leukaemogenic aberrant tyrosine kinase activity. The clinical course is characterized by three phases namely – chronic stable phase, accelerated phase and acute (blastic phase). Imatinib mesylate, an inhibitor of BCR-ABL was approved for treatment of CML and revolutionized its treatment and outcome. There is however a failure rate on imatinib of about 15 % that is partially addressed by second- and third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients treated at the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP), later Max Access Solutions (MAS) clinics at the Nairobi Hospital. Patient demographics, date of diagnosis, disease phase, and date of commencement of imatinib were documented. Treatment failure/switch, and reason were also documented. Results: A total of 1347 patients were included. Mean age was 44.12 years, males were 748 (55.5%), females 599 ((44.5%). All except two (1345) were initiated on imatinib, 206 (15.3%) were switched to second-line therapy due to various reasons including 31(2.3%) due to adverse events, 148 (11%) treatment failure, 15 (1.1%) due to unspecified reasons and 1 due to drug stock-outs. Second line medications were given to 204 patients: 100 (49%) dasatinib, 50 (24.5%) bosutinib, 38 (18.6%) nilotinib, 16 (7.8%) ponatinib. Deaths or losses to follow-up were 181 (13.4%). Conclusions: Overall about 15% failed on imatinib first-line therapy, similar to the experience from high-income countries. The most preferred second-line TKI was dasatinib, based on availability and toxicity profile.

Outcome of Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Propensity Score Analysis

Background: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) dramatically improve survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). However, patients may develop intolerance of or resistance to TKI therapy over years. Given multiple effective therapies available, the optimal selection of third-line therapy is not clear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of third-line TKI therapy in patients with CML-CP. Methods: We retrospectively combined patient-level data of third-line TKI therapy in the clinical trials of PACE and OPTIC studies with patients who received third-line TKI therapy at our institution. Given equivalent outcomes between second-generation TKIs (2G-TKI), we compared the outcomes of patients between 2G-TKI and ponatinib as third-line TKI therapy. Patients with T315I mutations were excluded in our study given the known resistance to all the 2G-TKI therapies. Multiple imputations was performed for missing covariates to reduce bias. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed for survival to identify prognostic factors with a p-value cutoff of 0.05 from univariate to multivariate analysis. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed with a caliper of 0.200, using matching covariates with age at the time of third-line therapy, gender, race, comorbidity, prior TKI therapy, the duration of prior TKI therapy, best prior response during the front-line and second-line TKI therapy, body mass index, white blood cell count, platelet count, percentages of basophils and blasts in peripheral blood, and BCR::ABL1 levels on the international scale. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from the start of third-line TKI therapy to the time of loss of major cytogenetic response during the study, progression to accelerated phase or blast phase at any time, death from any cause at any time, or the date of last follow-up; overall survival (OS) was defined as the start of third-line TKI therapy to death from any cause or the date of last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival with the log-rank test and a significance p-value level of 0.05. Results: We identified 354 patients who received third-line TKI therapy [204 patients (58%) from our institution; 63 patients (18%) from the PACE study; 87 (25%) patients from the OPTIC study] with a median follow-up of 46 months (Table 1). Among them as third-line TKI therapy, 173 patients received 2G-TKI [69 patients (19%), dasatinib; 64 patients (18%), nilotinib; 40 patients (11%), bosutinib], and 181 patients received ponatinib (51%). Overall, the median age at the time of third-line TKI therapy was 54 years (range, 18-87). Prior to third-line TKI therapy, 313 patients (88%) received imatinib; 156 patients (44%), dasatinib; 161 patients (45%), nilotinib; 35 patients (10%), bosutinib. The overall median BCR::ABL1 level was 16.3% on the international scale at the time of third-line TKI therapy. Patients who received ponatinib had higher rates of non-ischemic cardiovascular comorbidity, shorter total duration of prior TKI therapies, higher percentage of basophiles in peripheral blood, and higher levels of BCR::ABL1 on the international scale. Propensity score matching minimized the baseline covariates and identified 96 patients at each group with a median follow-up of 46 months after propensity score matching. There is a tendency of deeper response with ponatinib at baseline BCR::ABL1 levels of >1-10% and >0.1-1% before and after propensity score matching. Using pre-matched data, multivariate Cox regression showed older age at the time of third-line TKI therapy and higher BCR::ABL1 levels as adverse prognostic factors for survival ; the third-line ponatinib therapy was associated with favorable survival [P=0.003; hazard ratio (HR), 0.435; 95% confidence internal (CI), 0.253-0.748]. The 4-year PFS rates were 58% and 75% in the 2G-TKI and ponatinib group, respectively, before matching (P<0.001); the 4-year PFS rates were 78% and 89%, respectively, after matching (P=0.0099). The 4-year OS rates were 57% and 80% in the 2G-TKI and ponatinib group, respectively, before matching; the 4-year OS rates were 78% and 87%, respectively, after matching (Figure 1). Conclusion: Third-line ponatinib therapy is optimal selection for patients with CML-CP who failed prior 2 TKI therapies in the absence of T315I mutation. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

A retrospective observational research study to describe the real-world use of bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

ObjectivesTo describe the real‐world effectiveness and safety of bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).MethodsThis was a multi‐center, retrospective, non‐interventional chart review study conducted in 10 hospitals in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.ResultsEighty‐seven patients were included. Bosutinib was the third‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 33 (38%) and fourth‐line in 44 (51%) patients. Median treatment duration was 15.6 months. Among 84 patients in chronic phase (CP) at baseline, 26 (31%) switched to bosutinib due to resistance and 57 (68%) due to intolerance to prior TKIs. Cumulative complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rates in CP patients were 67% and 55%, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 21.5 months, nine (11%) patients in CP died; estimated overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years postbosutinib initiation were 95% and 91%, respectively. Overall, 33/87 (38%) patients discontinued bosutinib due to either lack of efficacy/disease progression (17%), adverse events (14%), death (2%), or other reasons (5%). Eighty‐two (94%) patients experienced ≥1 adverse event possibly related to bosutinib, most commonly diarrhea (52%).ConclusionsBosutinib used in routine clinical practice in heavily pretreated patients with CML is an effective treatment for patients in CP and is generally tolerable.

Efficacy Predictors of the Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Multi-Center Study

Background. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into real-world clinical practice considerably improved the prognosis for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, during long-term follow-up, almost 1/2 and 2/3 of patients in the chronic phase (CP) discontinue TKI therapy of the first or second line, respectively. According to the Russian and International clinical guidelines, the third-line therapy should include allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). And yet, some patients on the third-line therapy achieve and sustain optimal response on long-term TKI administration. Up to now, no clear-cut prognostic factors of TKI efficacy in the third-line therapy have been identified. This creates a challenge for treatment decision making after the failures of two lines of TKI therapy. Aim. To assess the efficacy of the third-line TKI therapy in real-world clinical practice and to identify the factors affecting the long-term therapy outcomes in CML-CP. Materials &amp; Methods. The retrospective study enrolled 73 CML-CP patients aged &gt; 18 years, treated with TKIs in the third-line at 5 specialized institutions in Saint Petersburg and Leningrad Region. Among the patients there were 26 men (35 %). The median age of the patients was 51 years (range 25-88 years). Results. With the median (range) third-line TKI therapy duration of 14 (1-120) months, the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCR) was 30 % (п = 22) in the total cohort. The median time before achieving CCR was 9 (4-25) months. With the median follow-up time from the beginning of third-line TKI therapy till the last visit of 25 (3-136) months, progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis was observed only in 13 (17 %) out of 73 patients. Death was reported in 26 % (n = 19) of cases, among them 5 patients whose death was not CML-associated. At the last visit, 13/73 (18 %) patients were still on third-line TKI therapy. Direct and longterm therapy outcomes, including achievement of CCR and assessment of overall and progression-free survivals, were significantly better in patients with any cytogenetic response (CR) than in those without it or without complete hematologic response. Conclusion. The implementation of TKIs in the third-line CML-CP therapy seems to be suitable for patients with at least some CR, especially if an optimal donor of hematopoietic stem cells is unavailable or if the risk of severe allo-HSCT complications is too high.

Response and Outcomes of Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy on Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Response and Outcomes of Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy on Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of second- and third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Does surgical resection have a role?

BackgroundImatinib resistance is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Although novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors have improved outcomes in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the role of resection remains unclear. We sought to investigate factors predictive of overall and progression-free survival in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. MethodsA query of our prospectively maintained Comprehensive Cancer Center registry was performed from 2003 to 2019 for patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clinicopathologic characteristics and medical and surgical treatments were collected; overall survival and progression-free survival after imatinib-resistance were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. ResultsA total of 84 patients developed imatinib resistance at a median age of 59 years. Median time to imatinib resistance after diagnosis and overall survival after imatinib resistance was 50 and 51 months, respectively. After being diagnosed with imatinib resistance, 17 (20%) patients underwent resection. On multivariable analysis, resection after imatinib resistance was independently associated with improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.50; P = .027) but not overall survival (hazard ratio 0.62; P = .215). Similar findings were found on subgroup analysis of patients treated with second-line sunitinib (n = 71). ConclusionLong-term survival can be achieved in patients who develop imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surgical resection of imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors is associated with improved progression-free survival and should be considered in selected patients.

Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Differential antitumor activity of compounds targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) cells

The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by oncogenic KIT signaling and can therefore be effectively treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib mesylate. However, most GISTs develop imatinib resistance through secondary KIT mutations. The type of resistance mutation determines sensitivity to approved second-/third-line TKIs but shows high inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. Therefore, therapeutic strategies that target KIT independently of the mutational status are intriguing. Inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery with bortezomib is effective in GIST cells through a dual mechanism of KIT transcriptional downregulation and upregulation of the pro-apoptotic histone H2AX but clinically problematic due to the drug’s adverse effects. We therefore tested second-generation inhibitors of the 20S proteasome (delanzomib, carfilzomib and ixazomib) with better pharmacologic profiles as well as compounds targeting regulators of ubiquitination (b-AP15, MLN4924) for their effectiveness and mechanism of action in GIST. All three 20S proteasome inhibitors were highly effective in vitro and in vivo, including in imatinib-resistant models. In contrast, b-AP15 and MLN4924 were only effective at high concentrations or had mostly cytostatic effects, respectively. Our results confirm 20S proteasome inhibitors as promising strategy to overcome TKI resistance in GIST, while highlighting the complexity of the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery as a therapeutic target.

The Use of Molecular Subtypes for Precision Therapy of Recurrent and Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor in the digestive tract. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), represented by imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib, have become the main treatment for recurrent and metastatic GISTs. With the wide application of mutation analysis and the precision medicine, molecular characteristics have been determined that not only predict the prognosis of patients with recurrent and metastatic GISTs, but also are closely related to the efficacy of first-, second- and third-line TKIs for GISTs, as well as other TKIs. Despite the significant effects of TKIs, the emergence of primary and secondary resistance ultimately leads to treatment failure and tumor progression. Currently, due to the signal transmission of KIT/PDGFRA during onset and tumor progression, strategies to counteract drug resistance include the replacement of TKIs and the development of new drugs that are directed towards carcinogenic mutations. In addition, it is also the embodiment of precision medicine for GISTs to explore new carcinogenic mechanisms and develop new drugs relying on new biotechnology. Surgery can benefit specific patients but its major purpose is to diminish the resistant clones. However, the prognosis of recurrent and metastatic patients is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, it is worth paying attention to how to maximize the benefits for patients.

Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of nilotinib or dasatinib as second- or third-line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase and accelerated phase

目的分析二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（TKI）尼洛替尼和达沙替尼作为二三线药物治疗慢性髓性白血病（CML）慢性期（CP）和加速期（AP）患者的治疗反应和预后，以及相关影响因素。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2018年11月北京大学人民医院收治的一二线TKI治疗失败并接受尼洛替尼或达沙替尼作为二三线治疗的CML-CP和AP患者资料。结果共收集183例尼洛替尼和达沙替尼作为二线治疗和43例尼洛替尼和达沙替尼作为三线治疗的CML-CP或AP患者。二线TKI治疗患者中，中位随访21（1~135）个月，完全血液学反应（CHR）率为80.4%，完全细胞遗传学反应（CCyR）率为56.3%，主要分子学反应（MMR）率为38.3%，3年疾病无进展生存（PFS）和总生存(OS)率分别为78.7%和93.1%。二线TKI治疗中，Sokal积分为高危、女性、一线TKI治疗期间获得最佳反应<CHR、诊断CML距转换二线TKI治疗时间≥18个月、二线TKI治疗前为AP/血液学耐药、二线TKI治疗前未检测出BCR-ABL特殊突变、二线治疗中发生≥3级血液学不良反应是获得细胞遗传学或分子学反应或PFS的不利影响因素。三线TKI治疗患者中，中位随访6（3~129）个月，CHR率为95.7%，CCyR率为29.3%，MMR率为18.6%，2年PFS和OS率分别为66.8%和93.8%。三线TKI治疗中，诊断距一线TKI治疗时间≥6个月、二线TKI治疗期间未获得细胞遗传学反应、诊断距三线TKI治疗时间≥60个月或转换治疗前疾病分期为AP患者获得治疗反应的比例显著降低或预后不良。结论尼洛替尼和达沙替尼作为二三线药物可以有效治疗TKI耐药的CML-CP和AP患者，前次TKI治疗期间获得的最佳反应、换药前疾病分期和本次TKI治疗中是否发生≥3级血液学不良反应等因素影响治疗结果。

Responses to Dasatinib as a Second- and Third-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dasatinib among 48 Chinese patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. The proportions of patients achieving the optimal molecular responses at 3, 6, and 12 months, a major molecular response (MMR) rate and a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate were 87.0, 87.0, 72.2, 45.8, and 72.7% for patients with dasatinib as second-line therapy, and 34.8, 34.8, 33.3, 20.8, and 46.2% as third-line therapy, respectively. A BCR-ABL1 transcript level on the International Scale (BCR-ABL1^IS) of ≤10% at the initiation of ­dasatinib treatment was found to be associated with a higher probability of achieving MMR. Among patients with a ­BCR-ABL1^IS higher than 10% at initiation of dasatinib treatment, dasatinib showed better performance as a second-line therapy than as a third-line therapy. The patients who achieved an optimal molecular response at 3 months had a superior cumulative incidence of MMR and CCyR compared with patients who failed to achieve such a response. Dasatinib induced considerable responses as a second-line treatment, especially in patients with a BCR-ABL1^IS ≤10% at initiation of treatment, whereas the efficacy was limited in patients receiving third-line therapy with a BCR-ABL1^IS >10% at the initiation of treatment.

ASCO update: lung cancer.

SummaryIn the past few years there have been major changes in the treatment landscape in oncology; lung cancer is affected by those changes like almost no other solid tumor. The rise of further second- and third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors offers sequential therapy for patients with mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Immunotherapy has found its way into clinical routine and presents us with new challenges in managing side effects, evaluating treatment response and deciding on how long we treat our patients. The treatment algorithm of lung cancer has changed in the last month and further practice-changing trials are coming up, so treating lung cancer patients shows nowadays a more challenging perspective with the possibility of subsequently applied individual therapies. This article provides a brief overview of the highlights presented at the ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) annual meeting this year in Chicago.

A population-based study of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib in first line.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment is based on company-sponsored and academic trials testing different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. These studies included patients selected according to many inclusion-exclusion criteria, particularly age and comorbidities, with specific treatment obligations. In daily clinical practice (real-life), inclusion-exclusion criteria do not exist, and the treatment outcome does not only depend on the choice of first-line TKI but also on second- and third-line TKIs. To investigate in a real-life setting the response and the outcome on first-line imatinib, with switch to second generation TKIs in case of unsatisfying response or intolerance, we analyzed all newly diagnosed patients (N = 236), living in two Italian regions, registered in a prospective study according to population-based criteria and treated front-line with imatinib. A switch from imatinib to second-generation TKIs was reported in 14% of patients for side effects and in 24% for failure or suboptimal response, with an improvement of molecular response in 57% of them. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-related survival (LRS) were 85% and 93%, respectively; the 4-year rates of MR3.0 and MR4.0 were 75% and 48%, respectively. Cardiovascular complications were reported in 4% of patients treated with imatinib alone and in 6% of patients receiving nilotinib as second-line. Older age (≥70 years) affected OS, but not LRS. These data provide an unbiased reference on the CML management and on the results of TKI treatment in real-life, according to ELN recommendations, using imatinib as first-line treatment and second-generation TKIs as second-line therapy. Am. J. Hematol. 92:82-87, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinical Benefit of Everolimus as Second-Line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The French Retrospective SECTOR Study

BackgroundReal-world data of everolimus after vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are limited. Patients and MethodsThe retrospective, noninterventional SECTOR (SECond line with afiniTOR) study (N = 165) assessed outcomes of second-line everolimus after initial VEGFR-TKI (TKI-everolimus, n = 144) and of third-line VEGFR-TKI after everolimus (TKI-everolimus-TKI, n = 59) in patients with mRCC. The primary end point was duration of everolimus therapy for both populations. ResultsMedian duration was 4.0 months (range, 0.0-33.0 months) for second-line everolimus and 18.0 months (range, 2-78 months) for sequential VEGFR-TKI and everolimus. Median overall survival (OS) for this sequence was 36.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-56.0 months) and was longer for patients who received a first-line TKI for ≥ 9 months (not reached) than for < 9 months (28.0 months; P < .001). During second-line everolimus treatment, commonly reported adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (n = 66, 40.7%), anemia (n = 58, 35.8%), and stomatitis (n = 41, 25.3%). Median duration from initiation of first-line TKI to the end of the third-line TKI was 24.0 months (95% CI, 19.0-29.0 months). Median OS for this sequence was 41.0 months (95% CI, 25.0-57.0 months) and was significantly longer for patients who received the first-line TKI for ≥ 9 months (37.5 months) than for < 9 months (19.0 months; P < .0001). ConclusionThese results reflect clinical use of sequential TKI-everolimus and TKI-everolimus-TKI and provide additional evidence that everolimus could be an option in second-line therapy in mRCC. Results of the CheckMate-025 (Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma) and METEOR (Metastatic RCC Phase 3 Study Evaluating Cabozantinib versus Everolimus) studies might change the treatment landscape.

Dasatinib treatment based on BCR- ABL mutation detection in imatinib- resistant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

目的探讨在BCR-ABL突变检测指导下选用达沙替尼治疗伊马替尼耐药慢性髓性白血病（CML）患者的有效性。方法83例伊马替尼耐药和39例伊马替尼与尼洛替尼均耐药的CML患者，持续口服达沙替尼，其中慢性期（CP) 55例，加速期（AP) 21例，急变期（BP) 46例。达沙替尼治疗前，经BCR-ABL突变筛查，除外具有对达沙替尼高度耐药突变类型（T315I/A、F317L/V/C和V299L）的患者。定期监测血液学、细胞遗传学和分子学反应，评估疾病进展和生存情况。当发生达沙替尼治疗失败时检测BCR-ABL突变。结果CP患者中，完全血液学反应（CHR）率为92.7%，完全细胞遗传学反应（CCyR）率为53.7%，主要分子学反应（MMR）率为29.6%，MR4.5率为14.8%，4年疾病无进展生存（PFS）率和总生存（OS）率分别为84.4％和89.5%。AP患者中，血液学反应（HR）率和CCyR率分别为81.0％和35.0%，3年PFS率和OS率分别为56.1％和59.3%。BP患者中，HR率和CCyR率分别为63.0%和21.4%，1年PFS率和OS率分别为43.6％和61.8%。达沙替尼作为二线和三线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂时，治疗反应相似。当发生达沙替尼治疗失败时，75例患者中37例（48.7%）检出新突变，T315I最为多见（59.5%）。达沙替尼治疗前存在突变的患者与无突变患者相比，治疗反应、PFS和OS差异均无统计学意义，但当出现达沙替尼耐药时，发生新突变的可能性显著增高（65.7％对34.1%，P=0.006）。结论达沙替尼可以有效治疗伊马替尼耐药或伊马替尼与尼洛替尼均耐药的CML各期患者，CP和AP患者疗效持久。达沙替尼治疗前BCR-ABL突变筛查及治疗中突变监测非常重要。

Healthcare utilization and costs associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor switching in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Differences in healthcare utilization and costs were examined in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients experiencing first-, second- and third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Three CML cohorts were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan® database: No-Switch Cohort (NSc) = did not switch from first-line; One-Switch Cohort (OSc) = switched from first- to second-line only; Two-Switch Cohort (TSc) = switched to second- and then third-line. A total of 3510 patients were identified (mean = 54%; age = 55.8 years). NSc comprised 81% of the sample, OSc comprised 15% and 4% were in the TSc. First-line utilization/costs were significantly higher in the OSc/TSc compared to the NSc. Second-line hospital/outpatient visits and costs were higher in TSc compared to OSc. TSc experienced a significant cost increase from first- to second-line ($4226.46), twice that of OSc ($2488.03). TKI switching is associated with a substantial increase in healthcare utilization and costs, particularly for patients who switch twice.

Burden of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Failure in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been extremely effective at inducing remissions and slowing down the progression of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resulting in a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality. Most patients with CML must remain on TKIs indefinitely and many experience resistance or intolerance to TKIs requiring a switch to a second-line TKI, third-line TKI or more. The purpose of the current review is to examine the underlying factors and subsequent economic and quality of life burdens associated with TKI failure. We discuss the definitions and rates of TKI failure in CML and the extent to which mutations and non-adherence are associated with TKI failure. We also review the few studies that have examined economic and patient outcomes associated with TKI failure and we suggest avenues for future research examining the consequences of TKI failure.

BCR-ABL1 Transcript of 7.93% at 3 Months Is an Early Predictor for Long-Term Survival to Second-Line Therapy Using Next Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

AbstractBackground: The first BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinibmesylate (IM), has become a first-line therapy for chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, approximately one third of IM-treated patients discontinue therapy due to an inadequate response or adverse event. More potent second or third generation TKIs such as nilotinib, dasatinib, radotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib have developed and these agents have shown high rates of hematologic and cytogenetic responses after failure of IM therapy. Although the new European Leukemia Net (ELN) recommendation serves provisionally the definitions of the response to second-line therapy, early molecular milestones which are associated with the best long-term are not confirmed. The aim of this study was to identify 3-month molecular milestone for predicting long-term survival to second-line therapy using second or third generation TKIs in CP CML patients who showed a failure or warning to IM.Methods: Between March 2005 and January 2014, 198 CP CML patients with failure or warning to IM (defined by 2013 ELN recommendation) had been treated with nilotinib, dasatinib, radotinib, bosutinib or ponatinib as a second-line therapy. Among them, 180 patients had available molecular data at 3 months from the initiation of second-line therapy. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveanalysis, the predictive cutoffs of BCL-ABL1 transcripts at 3 months for progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. OS included any death regardless of causes, and PFS included progression to AP or BP as well as death resulting from any reason. OS and PFS were also collected on patients who were treated with other TKIs after failure of second-line TKI therapy.Results: A total of 180 patients were treated with second-line TKI, dasatinib (n=66), nilotinib (n=61), radotinib (n=44), bosutinib (n=7), and ponatinib (n=2). 119 men and 61 women were included and their median age was 42 years (range, 15-75). Using a ROC curve analysis, BCR-ABL1 transcript level 7.93% on the international scale, at 3 months were predictive cutoffs for both PFS and OS. The median follow-up for survivors since the start of second-line TKI was 78.73 months (range, 6.3-114.0 months). 104 patients continue on therapy and 76 patients were permanently discontinued due to intolerance (n=38), failure (n=20), progression (n=14), and others (n=4). The7-year PFS and OS were 82.6% and 85.3%, respectively. The patients with transcript levels below 7.93% at 3 months had significantly better 7-year PFS (95.1% vs. 60.4%; P < 0.001) and OS (96.3% vs. 67.9%; P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential factors affecting PFS and OS in univariate analyses, multivariate analyses showed that BCR-ABL1 transcript of 7.93% at 3 months was the independent predictor for PFS (RR of 8.37, P < 0.001) and OS (RR of 13.53, P = 0.001). In addition, increasing age (RR of 1.05, P = 0.023) and presence of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain abnormalities (KDA) at baseline (RR of 5.83, P = 0.007) were associated with a lower OS.Conclusions: Our data showed BCR-ABL1 transcript of 7.93% at 3 months was an early independent predictor for long-term survival to second-line TKIs in IM-resistant CP CML. It implies that the patients who failed an achievement of reduction of BCR-ABL1transcripts to this level may require more precise monitoring on second-line therapy, allowing early clinical intervention using other third-line TKI therapy or allografting. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.