<h3>Background</h3> Thrombosis is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). Aspirin, and phlebotomy with or without cytoreductive therapy are key components of PV management to reduce thrombotic risk. However, patients with PV are also at risk for hemorrhagic complications, especially in the context of thrombocytosis and acquired Von Willebrand factor deficiency. The net benefit of antithrombotic therapy for primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis is uncertain. A systematic review conducted in 2013 identified 2 randomized control trials (RCTs) and concluded that low-dose aspirin does not increase the risk of major bleeding and is associated with a clinically but not statistically significant reduction in fatal thrombotic events. The risks and benefits of aspirin and other antithrombotics for primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis in PV remain uncertain. <h3>Objective</h3> To evaluate the benefits and harms of antithrombotic therapies in adult patients with PV. <h3>Methods</h3> MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Pubmed were searched for relevant articles. Studies were included if they (i) were RCTs or observational studies, (ii) included adults (≥18 years of age) with PV, (iii) compared outcomes (thrombosis, bleeding or mortality) in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy versus control or no antithrombotic therapy, and (iv) were published in English. Case reports, abstracts, narrative reviews, and editorials were excluded. Screening, full text review, and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers. The study protocol was developed according to PRISMA guidelines and registered on Prospero (PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017079688). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I Tool for observational studies. <h3>Results</h3> Out of 4523 studies identified, 12 studies (9 observational studies and 3 RCTs) were included in the analysis. Agreement by Cohen's kappa was excellent at the full text stage (0.89). Antithrombotics were associated with non-significant reductions in the risks of thrombosis (RR 0.83, CI 0.55 – 1.26, I2 72%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.67, CI 0.44 – 1.01, I2 22%) and a non-significant increase in the risk of bleeding (RR 1.19, CI 0.87 – 1.63, I2 0%) compared to control/no antithrombotics. Most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias. There was insufficient data to conduct a subgroup analysis for heparin and the direct oral anticoagulants. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our systematic review and meta-analysis is an updated comprehensive summary of available data regarding the benefits and harms of antithrombotic therapy in PV. In keeping with the findings of the previous meta-analysis, our results show non-significant reductions in thrombosis and death, and a non-significant increase in bleeding. However, this analysis is limited by heterogeneity and may be underpowered given the small sample sizes of included studies. Further, the included studies were at high risk of bias due to confounding. Prospective studies regarding anticoagulation in patients with PV are warranted.