Therapy Of Soft Tissue Infections Research Articles

Effectiveness of combined local therapy with antibiotics and fibrin vs. vacuum-assisted wound therapy in soft tissue infections: a retrospective study.

Soft tissue infections can be severe and life-threatening. Their treatment consists currently in radical surgical wound debridement and combined systemic antimicrobial therapy. Different side effects are possible. Local antibiotic therapy represents a new approach to reduce side effects and improve healing. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the local sprayed use of antibiotics with fibrin sealing compared with negative pressure wound therapy as an established treatment of soft-tissue infections. In this retrospective study, patients with soft tissue infections who underwent surgical treatment were analysed. One group consists of patients, who received local fibrin-antibiotic spray (FAS) (n = 62). Patients treated by vacuum-assisted wound therapy (VAWT) as the established treatment were the control group (n = 57). Main outcomes were differences in the success of healing, the duration until healing and the number of needed operations. Clinical healing could be achieved for 55 patients (98.21%) in the FAS group vs. 47 patients (92.16%) in the VAWT group (p = 0.19). Time to require this was 10.65 ± 10.38days in the FAS group and 22.85 ± 14.02days in the VAWT group (p < 0.001). In the FAS group, patients underwent an average of 1.44 ± 0.72 vs.3.46 ± 1.66 operations in the VAWT group (p < 0.001). Compared to vacuum-assisted wound therapy in soft tissue infections, local fibrin-antibiotic spray shows faster clinical healing and less needed operations. Leading to shorter hospital stays and more satisfied patients. The combination of sprayed fibrin and antibiotics can be seen as a promising and effective method.

Optimization of the antibiotic management of diabetic foot infections: protocol for two randomized controlled trials

BackgroundFew studies have addressed the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFI) with or without amputation. We will perform two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to reduce the antibiotic use and associated adverse events in DFI.MethodsWe hypothesize that shorter durations of postdebridement systemic antibiotic therapy are noninferior (10% margin, 80% power, alpha 5%) to existing (long) durations and we will perform two unblinded RCTs with a total of 400 DFI episodes (randomization 1:1) from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcome for both RCTs is remission of infection after a minimal follow-up of 2 months. The secondary outcomes for both RCTs are the incidence of adverse events and the overall treatment costs. The first RCT will allocate the total therapeutic amputations in two arms of 50 patients each: 1 versus 3 weeks of antibiotic therapy for residual osteomyelitis (positive microbiological samples of the residual bone stump); or 1 versus 4 days for remaining soft tissue infection. The second RCT will randomize the conservative approach (only surgical debridement without in toto amputation) in two arms with 50 patients each: 10 versus 20 days of antibiotic therapy for soft tissue infections; and 3 versus 6 weeks for osteomyelitis. All participants will have professional wound debridement, adequate off-loading, angiology evaluation, and a concomitant surgical, re-educational, podiatric, internist and infectiology care. During the surgeries, we will collect tissues for BioBanking and future laboratory studies.DiscussionBoth parallel RCTs will respond to frequent questions regarding the duration of antibiotic use in the both major subsets of DFIs, to ensure the quality of care, and to avoid unnecessary excesses in terms of surgery and antibiotic use.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04081792. Registered on 4 September 2019.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of telithromycin in peripheral soft tissues

Based on clinicians’ expectations of high concentrations of telithromycin (TEL) in tissues, combined with its excellent in vitro antimicrobial characteristics, TEL is casually considered as a potential therapeutic option for the therapy of minor cases of soft tissue or bite-wound infections. To clarify this clinically important issue, the present investigation was carried out to measure the pharmacokinetic profile of TEL in the interstitial space fluid (ISF) of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue by means of the microdialysis technique in 10 healthy subjects following repetitive daily doses of 800 mg TEL. These data were compared with free concentrations of TEL determined in plasma. External controls for the present examination were the use of historic, single-dose data collected by our study group utilising identical methods and the same trial subjects. Despite an increase in the median half-life from ca. 3 h after a single dose to ca. 10 h at steady-state conditions in all compartments, accumulation of TEL in ISF of soft tissues and plasma was clinically non-relevant. Median free peak concentrations in plasma, skeletal muscle and subcutis were 0.52, 0.13 and 0.19 mg/L, respectively. The median ratios of the tissue to plasma free areas under the concentration–time curves from 0 to 24 h ( fAUC 0–24 tissue/ fAUC 0–24 plasma) were 0.27 and 0.58 for muscle and subcutis, respectively ( P > 0.05). The present multiple-dose investigation of TEL is in line with a previous single-dose study confirming that TEL 800 mg/day may not be optimally effective in the therapy of soft tissue infections.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Soft Tissue Infections

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Soft Tissue Infections

An epidemic of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus soft tissue infections among medically underserved patients.

A high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in soft tissue infections presents a treatment challenge. Retrospective analysis. The San Francisco General Hospital Integrated Soft Tissue Infection (ISIS) Clinic. Patients treated at the ISIS Clinic from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2003. Information on patient demographics, surgical procedures, microbiologic studies, and antibiotic treatments was obtained for all patients treated in the ISIS Clinic. Microbial data and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of S aureus, treatment outcome, and antibiotic prescribed were analyzed for all evaluable patients. The ISIS Clinic treated 6156 unique patients for 12,012 episodes of infection. In this cohort, 5164 (84%) were either homeless or had no health insurance. More than half of the patients (58%) were injection drug users, but most had only 1 prior visit to the clinic (62%). Patients underwent a surgical procedure 7707 times (64%). Of the 837 positive cultures obtained, S aureus was recovered 695 times (83%), and 525 (63%) of the cultures contained MRSA. Therefore, a full 76% of all S aureus isolated was MRSA. In a subset analysis of 622 cultures collected prospectively from consecutive patients, 282 (45%) grew organisms, of which 256 (91%) were S aureus. MRSA represented 59% of all S aureus isolated. Homelessness and injection drug use were risk factors for infection by S aureus and MRSA. In another subgroup of patients with soft tissue infections that required admission to the hospital, MRSA was recovered from the cultures in 149 patients. In these patients with MRSA, 44 (30%) only received a beta-lactam antibiotic, inactive against MRSA, and had full resolution of their infection. The prevalence of MRSA soft tissue infections in the medically underserved ISIS Clinic cohort is extremely high. The transmission of the MRSA seems to be in the community. Antibiotic therapy directed at MRSA may not be needed in a large number of patients with these soft tissue infections. Studies to identify the source and cause of this MRSA outbreak are urgently needed. Clinical trials to examine the need for antibiotic therapy in soft tissue infections should be conducted.

The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the bout of treatment for soft tissue infections.

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is often combined with antibiotic therapy for infections such as gas gangrene and osteomyelitis. Although numerous investigations have been undertaken to assess the effect of adjunctive HBO therapy on the treatment of infections, the bout of treatment has not been referred in the previous investigations. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of HBO therapy on the bout of treatment for soft tissue infections. In the period between 1994 and 2001, we treated 23 patients with soft tissue infections. Nine patients were treated with antibiotic chemotherapy alone, and 14 patients were treated with a combination of antibiotic chemotherapy and HBO therapy. The mean bout of treatment was compared between these two groups. The mean bout treated with a combination of antibiotic and HBO was significantly shorter than that with antibiotic alone. Our result indicates that HBO therapy combined with antibiotic therapy is able to shorten the bout of treatment for soft tissue infections. Therefore, we recommend HBO therapy combined with antibiotic therapy for soft tissue infections.

Relevance of soft-tissue penetration by levofloxacin for target site bacterial killing in patients with sepsis.

Antimicrobial therapy of soft tissue infections in patients with sepsis sometimes lacks efficiency, despite the documented susceptibility of the causative pathogen to the administered antibiotic. In this context, impaired equilibration between the antibiotic concentrations in plasma and those in tissues in critically ill patients has been discussed. To characterize the impact of tissue penetration of anti-infective agents on antimicrobial killing, we used microdialysis to measure the concentration-versus-time profiles of levofloxacin in the interstitial space fluid of skeletal muscle in patients with sepsis. Subsequently, we applied an established dynamic in vivo pharmacokinetic-in vitro pharmacodynamic approach to simulate bacterial killing at the site of infection. The population mean areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) for levofloxacin showed that levofloxacin excellently penetrates soft tissues, as indicated by the ratio of the AUC from time zero to 8 h (AUC(0-8)) for muscle tissue (AUC(0-8 muscle)) to the AUC(0-8) for free drug in plasma (AUC(0-8 plasma free)) (AUC(0-8 muscle)/AUC(0-8 plasma free) ratio) of 0.85. The individual values of tissue penetration and maximum concentration (C(max)) in muscle tissue were highly variable. No difference in bacterial killing of a select Staphylococcus aureus strain for which the MIC was 0.5 microg/ml was found between individuals after exposure to dynamically changing concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and tissue in vitro. In contrast, the decrease in the bacterial counts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC = 2 microg/ml) varied extensively when the bacteria were exposed to levofloxacin at the concentrations determined from the individual concentration-versus-time profiles obtained in skeletal muscle. The extent of bacterial killing could be predicted by calculating individual C(max)/MIC and AUC(0-8 muscle)/AUC(0-8 plasma free) ratios (R = 0.96 and 0.93, respectively). We have therefore shown in the present study that individual differences in the tissue penetration of levofloxacin may markedly affect target site killing of bacteria for which MICs are close to 2 microg/ml.

Pefloxacin versus ceftazidime in therapy of soft tissue infections in compromised patients

Soft tissue infections in compromised patients are frequently caused by Gram-negative organisms and particularly by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These pathogens are effectively eradicated by pefloxacin as well as by ceftazidime. The effectiveness and safety of these two agents were compared in a prospective randomized study in 67 patients with soft tissue infections. Underlying conditions included malignant diseases, diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure. The infections included: post operative infection, septic foot, soft tissue abscess and cellulitis. Thirty-three patients were treated with intravenous ceftazidime for a mean duration of ten days. More than half the 34 patients given pefloxacin were treated only orally for a mean period of 13 days. The clinical and bacteriological outcomes were similar in both groups. There was clinical cure or improvement in 26 pefloxacin cases and in 23 ceftazidime cases, failure in six pefloxacin cases and in seven ceftazidime and relapse in two pefloxacin and in three ceftazidime patients. The bacteriological responses were eradication in 23 pefloxacin cases and in 22 ceftazidime cases, persistence in five pefloxacin cases and in six ceftazidime cases, relapse in one pefloxacin case and in none of the ceftazidime group, reinfection in four pefloxacin cases and in three ceftazidime cases and there was one unassessed patient in the pefloxacin group and two in the ceftazidime group. Nausea and vomiting occurred in three patients and elevation of liver enzymes in another patient; all side effects were observed only in the pefloxacin treated patients. These results suggest that oral pefloxacin could offer an alternative to intravenous ceftazidime in half the compromised patients with tissue infections. However, adverse reactions due to pefloxacin administration should be watched for during such therapy.

Role of imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of soft tissue infections

Imipenem/cilastatin was given to 243 evaluable patients with moderately severe to severe soft tissue infections. Cultures prior to therapy yielded Staphylococcus aureus (108 isolates), group D and non-group D enterococci (49), group A streptococci (42), other aerobic gram-positive cocci (72), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (54), Escherichia coil (32), Proteus mirabilis (31), Enterobacter (21), Klebsiella (20), other aerobic gram-negative rods (58), Bacteroides fragilis group (16), and other anaerobes (65). Overall, 95 percent (230 of 243) of the patients treated had clinical cure (137 of 243) or improvement (93 of 243). Of the 506 strains of etiologic bacterial pathogens isolated from these patients and tested against imipenem, 498 (98 percent) were susceptible to the antibiotic. Many were resistant to both older and newer penicillins and cephalosporins. Serial cultures of infection sites revealed that 426 of 498 (86 percent) of pre-therapy bacterial isolates were eradicated by imipenem/cilastatin therapy. Eight of 498 etiologic pathogens (1.6 percent) acquired resistance to imipenem (seven P. aeruginosa and one enterococcus). Such resistance acquisition was associated with clinical failure in two patients. Imipenem/cilastatin appears to be a highly effective, relatively safe therapy of soft tissue infections caused by a wide variety of gram-positive and gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes, both polymicrobial and monomicrobial in nature. Imipenem/cilastatin should be considered particularly when infection by the more antibiotic-resistant of these bacteria is suspected or proved.