Therapy In Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Research Articles

CSF Biomarkers of Intrathecal Cell Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Reflect Changes in Microglia and Astrocyte Polarization (P8-6.009)

CSF Biomarkers of Intrathecal Cell Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Reflect Changes in Microglia and Astrocyte Polarization (P8-6.009)

Effects of Ibudilast on Retinal Atrophy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes: Post Hoc Analyses of the SPRINT-MS Trial.

Ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning, measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), reflects global neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Atrophy of the inner (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) may also be prominent in progressive MS (PMS). The phase 2, SPRINT-MS trial found reduced brain atrophy with ibudilast therapy in PMS. In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT-MS trial, we investigate (1) retinal atrophy (2) differences in response by subtype and (3) associations between OCT and MRI measures of neurodegeneration. In the multicenter, double-blind SPRINT-MS trial, participants with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS) were randomized to ibudilast or placebo. OCT and MRI data were collected every 24 weeks for 96 weeks. Extensive OCT quality control and algorithmic segmentation produced consistent results across Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis devices. Primary endpoints were GCIPL, INL, and ONL atrophy, assessed by linear mixed-effects regression. Secondary endpoints were associations of OCT measures, brain parenchymal fraction, and cortical thickness, assessed by partial Pearson correlations. One hundred thirty-four PPMS and 121 SPMS participants were included. GCIPL atrophy was 79% slower in the ibudilast (-0.07 ± 0.23 µm/y) vs placebo group (-0.32 ± 0.20 µm/y, p = 0.003). This effect predominated in the PPMS cohort (ibudilast: -0.08 ± 0.29 µm/y vs placebo: -0.60 ± 0.29 µm/y, a decrease of 87%, p < 0.001) and was not detected in the SPMS cohort (ibudilast: -0.21 ± 0.28 µm/y vs placebo: -0.14 ± 0.27 µm/y, p = 0.55). GCIPL, INL, and ONL atrophy rates correlated with whole brain atrophy rates across the cohort (r = 0.27, r = 0.26, and r = 0.20, respectively; p < 0.001). Power calculations from these data show future trials of similar size and design have ≥80% power to detect GCIPL atrophy effect sizes of approximately 40%. Ibudilast treatment decreased GCIPL atrophy in PMS, driven by the PPMS cohort, with no effect seen in SPMS. Modulated atrophy of retinal layers may be detectable in sample sizes smaller than the SPRINT-MS trial and correlate with whole brain atrophy in PMS, further highlighting their utility as outcomes in PMS. This study provides Class II evidence that ibudilast reduces composite ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer atrophy, without reduction of inner or outer nuclear layer atrophy, in patients with primary progressive MS but not those with secondary progressive MS.

Efficacy of Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Neural Progenitor Therapy in Progressive MS: Results from a Phase II Clinical Trial (S16.005)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To determine safety and efficacy of intrathecal (IT) mesenchymal stem cell-neural progenitor (MSC-NP) treatment in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). <h3>Background:</h3> MSC-NPs are bone marrow-derived cells with trophic and immunomodulatory properties with therapeutic potential in MS. In an open-label phase I clinical study in 20 progressive MS subjects, the safety and tolerability of the treatment was demonstrated, and was associated with functional neurological improvement, particularly in ambulatory patients. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed to investigate the clinical efficacy of multiple intrathecal (IT) injections of autologous MSC-NPs s associated with clinical efficacy. Study subjects (n=54) were stratified according to EDSS (3.0–6.5) and disease subtype (SPMS/PPMS) and randomized into either treatment or placebo group to receive 6 IT injections of MSC-NPs or placebo every 2 months. In year 2, subjects crossed over into the opposite group. The primary outcome was improvement in either EDSS, timed 25-foot walk or 9-hole peg test (EDSS Plus). Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk test (6MWT), brain volume, and muscle strength. <h3>Results:</h3> Subjects were randomized into treatment (n=24) or placebo (n=27) groups and 3 subjects dropped out of the study. There were 9 serious adverse events, none of which were related to the study intervention. There were no significant differences in the primary endpoint between the two groups in year 1. In the 6MWT, the placebo group showed significant worsening in distance walked compared to the MSC-NP group, specifically in subjects with higher EDSS (6.0–6.5). Overall, 50% of SPMS subjects in the MSC-NP group demonstrated improved muscle strength compared to 33% of SPMS in the placebo group. Preliminary results from the crossover group in year 2 show similar trends in muscle strength and 6MWT after MSC-NP treatment. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> These results suggest that IT-MSC-NP treatment may correlate with therapeutic response in a subgroup of MS patients. <b>Disclosure:</b> Ms. Roche has nothing to disclose. Miss Malin has nothing to disclose. Dr. Stark has nothing to disclose. Dr. Williams has nothing to disclose. Violaine K. Harris, PhD has nothing to disclose. Dr. Sadiq has nothing to disclose.

FGF/FGFR system in the central nervous system demyelinating disease: Recent progress and implications for multiple sclerosis.

With millions of victims worldwide, multiple sclerosis is the second most common cause of disability among young adults. Although formidable advancements have been made in understanding the disease, the neurodegeneration associated with multiple sclerosis is only partially counteracted by current treatments, and effective therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis remains an unmet need. Therefore, new approaches are required to delay demyelination and the resulting disability and to restore neural function by promoting remyelination and neuronal repair. The article reviews the latest literature in this field. The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathway is a promising target in progressive multiple sclerosis. FGF signal transduction contributes to establishing the oligodendrocyte lineage, neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation, and myelination of the central nervous system. Furthermore, FGF signaling is implicated in the control of neuroinflammation. In recent years, interventions targeting FGF, and its receptor (FGFR) have been shown to ameliorate autoimmune encephalomyelitis symptoms in multiple sclerosis animal models moderately. Here, we summarize the recent findings and investigate the role of FGF/FGFR signaling in the onset and progression, discuss the potential therapeutic advances, and offer fresh insights into managing multiple sclerosis.

Neural stem cell transplantation in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label, phase 1 study

Innovative pro-regenerative treatment strategies for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS), combining neuroprotection and immunomodulation, represent an unmet need. Neural precursor cells (NPCs) transplanted in animal models of multiple sclerosis have shown preclinical efficacy by promoting neuroprotection and remyelination by releasing molecules sustaining trophic support and neural plasticity. Here we present the results of STEMS, a prospective, therapeutic exploratory, non-randomized, open-label, single-dose-finding phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03269071, EudraCT 2016-002020-86), performed at San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy, evaluating the feasibility, safety and tolerability of intrathecally transplanted human fetal NPCs (hfNPCs) in 12 patients with PMS (with evidence of disease progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale ≥6.5, age 18–55 years, disease duration 2–20 years, without any alternative approved therapy). The safety primary outcome was reached, with no severe adverse reactions related to hfNPCs at 2-year follow-up, clearly demonstrating that hfNPC therapy in PMS is feasible, safe and tolerable. Exploratory secondary analyses showed a lower rate of brain atrophy in patients receiving the highest dosage of hfNPCs and increased cerebrospinal fluid levels of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective molecules. Although preliminary, these results support the rationale and value of future clinical studies with the highest dose of hfNPCs in a larger cohort of patients.

S100B inhibition protects from chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Studies have correlated excessive S100B, a small inflammatory molecule, with demyelination and associated inflammatory processes occurring in multiple sclerosis. The relevance of S100B in multiple sclerosis pathology brought an emerging curiosity highlighting its use as a potential therapeutic target to reduce damage during the multiple sclerosis course, namely during inflammatory relapses. We examined the relevance of S100B and further investigated the potential of S100B-neutralizing small-molecule pentamidine in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. S100B depletion had beneficial pathological outcomes and based on promising results of a variety of S100B blockade strategies in an ex vivo demyelinating model, we choose pentamidine to assay its role in the in vivo experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. We report that pentamidine prevents more aggressive clinical symptoms and improves recovery of chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Blockade of S100B by pentamidine protects against oligodendrogenesis impairment and neuroinflammation by reducing astrocyte reactivity and microglia pro-inflammatory phenotype. Pentamidine also increased regulatory T cell density in the spinal cord suggesting an additional immunomodulatory action. These results showed the relevance of S100B as a main driver of neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and identified an uncharacterized mode of action of pentamidine, strengthening the possibility to use this drug as an anti-inflammatory and remyelinating therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis.

Stem Cell Therapies for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterized by demyelination and axonal degeneration. MS patients typically present with a relapsing-remitting (RR) disease course, manifesting as sporadic attacks of neurological symptoms including ataxia, fatigue, and sensory impairment. While there are several effective disease-modifying therapies able to address the inflammatory relapses associated with RRMS, most patients will inevitably advance to a progressive disease course marked by a gradual and irreversible accrual of disabilities. Therapeutic intervention in progressive MS (PMS) suffers from a lack of well-characterized biological targets and, hence, a dearth of successful drugs. The few medications approved for the treatment of PMS are typically limited in their efficacy to active forms of the disease, have little impact on slowing degeneration, and fail to promote repair. In looking to address these unmet needs, the multifactorial therapeutic benefits of stem cell therapies are particularly compelling. Ostensibly providing neurotrophic support, immunomodulation and cell replacement, stem cell transplantation holds substantial promise in combatting the complex pathology of chronic neuroinflammation. Herein, we explore the current state of preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of stem cells in treating PMS and we discuss prospective hurdles impeding their translation into revolutionary regenerative medicines.

Epstein-Barr virus-specific T cell therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis.

Epstein-Barr virus-specific T cell therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis.

Glial pathology and retinal neurotoxicity in the anterior visual pathway in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

The animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) has been used extensively in the past to test mechanisms that target peripheral immune cells for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). While there have been some notable successes in relapsing MS, the development of therapies for progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) has been hampered by lack of an appropriate animal model. Further, the mechanisms underlying CNS inflammation and neuronal injury remain incompletely elucidated. It is known that the MOG 35–55 EAE mouse model does not have insidious behavioral progression as occurs in people with MS, but there is significant neuronal and axonal injury in EAE, as a result of the inflammation. In the present study, we describe the time course of glial activation and retinal neurodegeneration in the EAE model, and highlight the utility of studying the anterior visual pathway for modeling mechanisms of neuronal injury that may recapitulate critical aspects of the pathology described in people with MS following optic neuritis and subclinical optic neuropathy. We show that A1 neurotoxic astrocytes are prevalent in optic nerve tissue and retina, and are associated with subsequent RGC loss in the most commonly used form of the EAE model induced by MOG 35–55 peptide in C57/B6 mice. We developed a semi-automatic method to quantify retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and show that RGCs remain intact at peak EAE (PID 16) but are significantly reduced in late EAE (PID 42). Postsynaptic proteins and neurites were also compromised in the retina of late EAE mice. The retinal pathology manifests weeks after the microglial and astrocyte activation, which were prominent in optic nerve tissues at PID 16. Microglia expressed iNOS and had increased gene expression of C1q, TNF-α, and IL-1α. Astrocytes expressed high levels of complement component 3 and other genes associated with A1 neurotoxic astrocytes. Our data suggest that EAE can be used to study the pathobiology of optic neuropathy and to examine the preclinical neuroprotective effects of drugs that target activation of neurotoxic A1 astrocytes.

Upcoming therapeutic options for progressive multiple sclerosis

Although a wide range of therapeutic options are available for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the therapeutic landscape for progressive forms of the disease is highly unsatisfactory. Therefore, the identification of effective therapies for progressive MS (PMS) is a highly relevant challenge for the global MS medical community. To achieve this, a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in PMS is required through novel clinical trial designs, new drug repurposing strategies and new methods of collaboration in identifying effective therapies. In this review, we discuss the first compounds already available for PMS as well as other therapies currently undergoing phase II and III clinical trials.

Assessment of bone marrow-derived Cellular Therapy in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (ACTiMuS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BackgroundWe have recently completed an evaluation of the safety and feasibility of intravenous delivery of autologous bone marrow in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The possibility of repair was suggested by improvement in the neurophysiological secondary outcome measure seen in all participants. The current study will examine the efficacy of intravenous delivery of autologous marrow in progressive MS. Laboratory studies performed in parallel with the clinical trial will further investigate the biology of bone marrow-derived stem cell infusion in MS, including mechanisms underlying repair.Methods/designA prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, stepped wedge design will be employed at a single centre (Bristol, UK). Eighty patients with progressive MS will be recruited; 60 will have secondary progressive disease (SPMS) but a subset (n = 20) will have primary progressive disease (PPMS). Participants will be randomised to either early or late (1 year) intravenous infusion of autologous, unfractionated bone marrow. The placebo intervention is infusion of autologous blood. The primary outcome measure is global evoked potential derived from multimodal evoked potentials. Secondary outcome measures include adverse event reporting, clinical (EDSS and MSFC) and self-assessment (MSIS-29) rating scales, optical coherence tomography (OCT) as well as brain and spine MRI. Participants will be followed up for a further year following the final intervention. Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.DiscussionAssessment of bone marrow-derived Cellular Therapy in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (ACTiMuS) is the first randomised, placebo-controlled trial of non-myeloablative autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy in MS. It will determine whether bone marrow cell therapy can, as was suggested by the phase I safety study, improve conduction in multiple central nervous system pathways affected in progressive MS. Furthermore, laboratory studies performed in parallel with the clinical trial will inform our understanding of the cellular pharmacodynamics of bone marrow infusion in MS patients and the mechanisms underlying cell therapy.Trial RegistrationISRCTN27232902 Registration date 11/09/2012. NCT01815632 Registration date 19/03/2013

Repeat infusion of autologous bone marrow cells in multiple sclerosis: protocol for a phase I extension study (SIAMMS-II)

IntroductionThe ‘Study of Intravenous Autologous Marrow in Multiple Sclerosis (SIAMMS)’ trial was a safety and feasibility study which examined the effect of intravenous infusion of autologous bone marrow without myeloablative...

ACTIMUS—PHASE II CELL THERAPY TRIAL IN PROGRESSIVE MS

We have recently completed a phase I trial of intravenous delivery of autologous bone marrow in progressive MS (‘SIAMMS’). The possibility of repair was suggested by improvements in the neurophysiological secondary outcome measure. The ‘Assessment of Bone Marrow-derived Cellular Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis’ (ACTiMuS), due to commence in spring 2014, will examine the efficacy of intravenous delivery of autologous marrow in progressive MS. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, stepped wedge design will be employed at a single centre. Eighty patients with primary (20) or secondary (60) progressive MS will be recruited and randomised to either early (immediate) or late (1 year) intravenous infusion of autologous, filtered bone marrow. The placebo intervention is infusion of autologous blood. Participants will be followed up for a further year following the final intervention. The primary outcome measure is global evoked potential derived from multimodal evoked potentials. Secondary outcome measures include adverse event reporting, clinical (EDSS and MSFC) and self-assessment (MSIS-29) rating scales, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and brain and spine MRI. Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Laboratory studies performed in parallel with the clinical trial will further investigate the biology of bone marrow infusion in MS, including mechanisms underlying repair.

Stopping Disease Modifying Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis - A Prospective Study (I7-2.005)

Stopping Disease Modifying Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis - A Prospective Study (I7-2.005)

Stopping Disease Modifying Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis - A Prospective Study (P7.207)

Stopping Disease Modifying Therapy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis - A Prospective Study (P7.207)

M2 microglia and macrophages drive oligodendrocyte differentiation during CNS remyelination.

The lack of therapies for progressive multiple sclerosis highlights the need to understand the regenerative process of remyelination that can follow CNS demyelination. This involves an innate immune response consisting of microglia and macrophages, which can be polarized to distinct functional phenotypes: pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory or immunoregulatory (M2). We found that a switch from an M1- to an M2-dominant response occurred in microglia and peripherally derived macrophages as remyelination started. Oligodendrocyte differentiation was enhanced in vitro with M2 cell conditioned media and impaired in vivo following intra-lesional M2 cell depletion. M2 cell densities were increased in lesions of aged mice in which remyelination was enhanced by parabiotic coupling to a younger mouse and in multiple sclerosis lesions that normally show remyelination. Blocking M2 cell-derived activin-A inhibited oligodendrocyte differentiation during remyelination in cerebellar slice cultures. Thus, our results indicate that M2 cell polarization is essential for efficient remyelination and identify activin-A as a therapeutic target for CNS regeneration.

Immunosuppressive therapy reduces axonal damage in progressive multiple sclerosis

Background: In progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS), disease-modifying therapies have not been shown to reduce disability progression. Objective: The impact from immunosuppressive therapy in PMS was explored by analyzing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of axonal damage (neurofilament light protein, NFL), astrogliosis (glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP), and B-cell regulation (CXCL13). Methods: CSF was obtained from 35 patients with PMS before and after 12–24 months of mitoxantrone (n=30) or rituximab (n=5) treatment, and from 14 age-matched healthy control subjects. The levels of NFL, GFAP, and CXCL13 were determined by immunoassays. Results: The mean NFL level decreased by 51% (1781 ng/l, SD 2018 vs. 874 ng/l, SD 694, p=0.007), the mean CXCL13 reduction was 55% (9.71 pg/ml, SD 16.08, vs. 4.37 pg/ml, SD 1.94, p=0.008), while GFAP levels remained unaffected. Subgroup analysis showed that the NFL reduction was confined to previously untreated patients (n=20) and patients with Gd-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (n=12) prior to study baseline. Conclusions: Our data imply that 12–24 months of immunosuppressive therapy reduces axonal damage in PMS, particularly in patients with ongoing disease activity. Determination of NFL levels in CSF is a potential surrogate marker for treatment efficacy and as endpoint in phase II trials of MS.

Systemic disease and neuro-ophthalmology: annual update 2000 (Part I).

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (1–86), with substantial long-term neurologic consequences (1,4,9,25,34, 52,54,55,57,60,63,65). After 10 years with MS, 50% of patients are unable to perform household and occupational responsibilities; after 15 to 20 years, 50% are unable to walk without assistance; after 25 years, 50% are unable to ambulate. The average annual cost of MS in the United States is greater than 6.8 billion dollars (1). There are three main subtypes of the disease: relapsing remitting (RR), secondary progressive (SP), and primary progressive (PP). This update reviews the current status of MS therapy (1–86). We have chosen to focus on the new and emerging immunomodulatory therapies for disease relapses and the treatments to prevent disease progression. We do not review the treatments for common MS-related sensory and motor symptoms, fatigue, or depression (35).

Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone: response to therapy is linked to the duration of progressive disease.

To determine if there are variables linked to responsiveness to pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone therapy in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS). MS is a presumed autoimmune disease of the CNS in which immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory treatments are being used. We have treated patients with the progressive form of MS using a regimen consisting of pulse cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone that is given as an outpatient at 4 - 8 week intervals similar to lupus nephritis protocols. We investigated a series of 95 consecutive progressive MS patients treated in an open label fashion in an effort to identify factors linked to response to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included status at 12 months and time to failure determined by EDSS change and global physician impression. For each endpoint, associations were examined between outcome and patient characteristics including gender, age at onset of disease and treatment, EDSS 1 year previously and at start of treatment, duration of MS, previous treatment, age at onset and duration of progression, and primary vs secondary progressive MS. Of the variables studied, age, gender, age at onset, and age at treatment did not correlate with response to therapy. The most significant variable that correlated with response was length of time the patient was in the progressive phase (P=0.048, 12 month change in EDSS; P=0.017, risk for time to failure). Patients that improved on therapy at 12 months had progressive disease for an average of 2.1 years prior to treatment, whereas those stable or worse had progressive disease for 5.0 and 4.1 years respectively. There was a trend (P=0.08) favoring positive clinical responses in secondary progressive as opposed to primary progressive patients. Our data suggest that progressive MS may become refractory to immunosuppressive therapy with time and early intervention when patients enter the progressive stage should be considered. Furthermore, in trials of immunosuppressive agents for progressive MS, duration of progression should be considered as a randomization and analysis variable.

Combination total lymphoid irradiation and low-dose corticosteroid therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis

Combination total lymphoid irradiation and low-dose corticosteroid therapy for progressive multiple sclerosis