Maintenance Therapy Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin in generalized myasthenia gravis patients with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Prospective, randomized, controlled trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are lacking. In this trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of caprylate/chromatography-purified IVIG; (IGIV-C) in patients with generalized MG undergoing standard care. Sixty-two patients enrolled in this phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized trial (1:1 IGIV-C [2 g/kg loading dose; 1 g/kg every 3 weeks through week 21] or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by changes in Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 24 versus baseline (primary endpoint) and percentage of patients with clinical improvement in QMG, MG Composite (MGC), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (secondary endpoints). Safety assessments reported all adverse events (AEs). The change in QMG at 24 weeks was -5.1 for IGIV-C and -3.1 for placebo (p = .187). Seventy percent of patients in the IGIV-C group had improvement in MG-ADL (≥2-point decrease) versus 40.6% in the placebo group (p = .025). Patients showing clinical improvement in QMG and MGC (≥3-point decrease) were 70.0% for IGIV-C versus 59.4% for placebo (p = .442) and 60.0% for IGIV-C versus 53.1% for placebo (p = .610). IGIV-C was well tolerated; serious AEs were similar between arms. Three of four MG exacerbations requiring hospitalizations occurred in the IGIV-C arm with one death. Several efficacy parameters showed numerical results greater than those seen in the placebo group. This was a small study and may have been underpowered to see significant differences. Additional studies may be warranted to fully determine the efficacy of IVIG maintenance therapy in MG.

A phase 1/2 study of gilteritinib in combination with chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with AML in Asia.

This interim analysis of a phase 1/2, open-label, single-arm study assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of gilteritinib plus chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutation-positive acute myeloid leukemia. In sequential phase 1 and 2 studies, induction and consolidation therapy with gilteritinib 120 mg/day plus chemotherapy (induction: idarubicin/cytarabine once daily; consolidation: cytarabine twice daily) was followed by maintenance gilteritinib 120 mg/day monotherapy. Endpoints included maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended expansion dose (RED), and dose-limiting toxicity (phase 1), and complete remission (CR) rate following induction therapy (primary endpoint), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics (phase 2). In phase 1, MTD was not reached and RED was 120 mg/day. In phase 2, the CR rate was 50.0% after induction (90% confidence interval [CI] 40.4, 59.6); however, the lower confidence limit did not exceed the pre-defined 55% benchmark. Composite CR (CRc) rates were high following induction (86.6%, 95% CI [77.3, 93.1]), consolidation, and maintenance therapy (87.8%, 95% CI [78.7, 94.0], each). The probability of OS was 86.6% at 12 months. No new safety findings were reported. In this interim analysis, gilteritinib 120 mg/day in combination with chemotherapy was well tolerated, with similar CRc rates to previous studies.

Survival Outcomes of Patients with Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Agents: A Real-Life Multicenter Analysis.

In this study, we aimed to obtain real-life data on the use of antimyeloma agents, which significantly increase overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, in primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) patients with a poor prognosis. Data from 53 patients who were diagnosed with pPCL between 2011-2020 and who used at least one proteasome inhibitor (PI) and/or immunomodulatory (IMID) agent were analyzed retrospectively. Depending on the year of pPCL diagnosis, 20% leukocytes or ≥2×109/L plasma cells in the peripheral blood were used. The median age of the patients was 58 years, and 23 (43.4%) patients were over 65 years of age. For first-line treatment, PI or IMID alone was used in 31 (58.5%) patients, and PI and IMID were used simultaneously in 15 (28.3%) patients. Additionally, 21 (39.6%) patients received transplantation, and 13 (24.5%) patients received maintenance treatment. The median progression-free survival was 4 (1-42) months. When patients whose primary disease was refractory to first-line therapy were excluded, the duration of treatment was 6.5 months. The median OS was 15 months, with a median follow-up of 15 months. Only 7 (13.2%) of the patients were alive at the last follow-up visit. Those with higher beta-2 microglobulin levels and ISS stage 3 and nontransplant patients receiving first-line treatment had shorter OS (p=0.005, p=0.02 and p=0.008, respectively). Otherwise, the concomitant use of PIs and IMIDs, the addition of chemotherapy to induction therapy, and the response to induction therapy or maintenance therapy did not affect OS. In our study, as in previous similar studies, we could not see the increased survival trend in pPCL which is observed in MM. New studies are needed for pPCL patients, which is likely to increase with the new diagnostic criteria, based on current agents and information in MM.

Pilot Trial of Perampanel on Peritumoral Hyperexcitability in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma.

Glutamatergic neuron-glioma synaptogenesis and peritumoral hyperexcitability promote glioma growth in a positive feedback loop. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and estimated effect sizes of the targeted AMPA receptor antagonist perampanel on peritumoral hyperexcitability. An open-label trial was performed comparing perampanel with standard of care (SOC) in patients undergoing resection of newly diagnosed radiologic high-grade glioma. Perampanel was administered as a preoperative loading dose followed by maintenance therapy until progressive disease or up to 12 months. SOC treatment involved levetiracetam for 7 days or as clinically indicated. The primary outcome of hyperexcitability was defined by intraoperative electrocorticography high-frequency oscillation (HFO) rates. Seizure freedom and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Tissue concentrations of perampanel, levetiracetam, and correlative biomarkers were measured by mass spectrometry. HFO rates were similar between patients treated with perampanel and levetiracetam. The trial was terminated early after a planned interim analysis, and outcomes assessed in 11 patients (seven perampanel treated; four treated with SOC). Over a median 281 days of postenrollment follow-up, 27% of patients had seizures, including 14% maintained on perampanel and 50% treated with SOC. Overall survival in perampanel-treated patients was similar to that in a glioblastoma reference cohort. Glutamate concentrations in surface biopsies were positively correlated with HFO rates in adjacent electrode contacts and were not significantly associated with treatment assignment or drug concentrations. Glioma peritumoral glutamate concentrations correlated with high-gamma oscillation rates. Targeting glutamatergic activity with perampanel achieved similar electrocorticographic hyperexcitability levels as in levetiracetam-treated patients.

Ten clinical conundrums in the management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is an immune-mediated, inflammatory, multisystemic disease that is considered a form of ANCA-associated vasculitis and whose association with asthma and blood and tissue eosinophilia differentiate it from other types of vasculitis. Nevertheless, diagnosis of EGPA may be difficult or delayed not only because of the rarity of the disease, but also because other diseases can present with similar manifestations. We review a series of key areas in EGPA, namely, laboratory and clinical indicators of disease, diagnosis, role of biomarkers, induction and maintenance therapy, and use of traditional and novel drugs. This narrative review was based on a thorough search of PubMed. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of available tools for diagnosing EGPA, and more efforts should be made to identify clinical and laboratory red flags, with the purpose of achieving an early diagnosis before irreversible damage occurs. New effective therapies are available, although future research should target an approach that spares glucocorticoids, reduces the risk of flares and organ damage, and maintains long-term remission with minimum adverse effects.

Prior antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and probiotics in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint blockade: A post-hoc analysis of the phase I/III IMpower 133 trial.

The potential impact of concomitant medications such as systemic antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and probiotics in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) receiving first-line chemo-immunotherapy combinations remains unclear. We ran a post hoc analysis of the IMpower133 phase I/III trial, which randomized patients with ES-SCLC to receive carboplatin/etoposide with either atezolizumab or placebo for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy. We included any systemic antibiotic/probiotic exposure within 42 days prior to treatment initiation and any PPIs treatment within 30 days prior to treatment initiation. We explored the potential prognostic impact of antibiotics, PPIs and probiotics across the atezolizumab/chemotherapy and placebo/chemotherapy arms including the multivariable interaction term between the treatment modality and antibiotics/PPIs/probiotics. The analysis included 198 patients in the atezolizumab/chemotherapy arm and 195 in the placebo/chemotherapy arm. Baseline clinic-pathologic features were well balanced between the two cohorts, with 17 (8.6%) and 14 (7.2%) patients on antibiotics, 43 (21.7%) and 55 (28.2%) on PPIs, and 3 (1.5%) and 5 (2.6%) on probiotics among the atezolizumab/chemotherapy and placebo/chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. Exposure to antibiotics, PPIs, or probiotics was not associated with overall survival or progression free survival in either cohort. Furthermore, interaction terms between these medications and treatment modalities were not statistically significant. Baseline use of antibiotics, PPIs or probiotics did not influence clinical outcomes in patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line atezolizumab/placebo plus chemotherapy, suggesting that they may not have a notable impact on clinical outcomes and could be considered for use in this patient population when necessary.

Olaparib-associated toxicity in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To investigate the characteristics of olaparib-associated adverse events (AEs) in cancer patients. Databases were searched for phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving olaparib treatment up to March 2024. A systematic assessment was performed. Twenty-seven RCTs involving 9542 patients were included. This meta-analysis indicates that olaparib could significantly increase the risk of developing any all-grade (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13; p = 0.001) and high-grade (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19-1.77; p = 0.0003) AEs in cancer patients. Olaparib could increase the risk of dose reduction (RR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.59-5.70; p = 0.0007) and treatment discontinuation (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28-3.14; p = 0.002). Hematologic toxicities and gastrointestinal toxicities commonly occur in patients receiving olaparib. Anemia, nausea, and fatigue were the most frequent AEs, with olaparib increasing the risk of both all-grade and high-grade occurrences of these events. Patients with longer treatment durations tend to have a higher risk of anemia. Patients with urinary system tumors tend to have a higher risk of nausea, while those with breast cancer tend to have a higher risk of fatigue. Olaparib maintenance therapy may be associated with a higher risk of fatigue. Olaparib could increase other AEs such as diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, dyspepsia, dysgeusia, dizziness, headache, back pain, urinary tract infection, dyspnea, and cough. Olaparib-containing therapy could increase the occurrence of specific AEs in patients with cancer. Clinicians should be aware of these risks and conduct regular monitoring.

TPX2 serves as a novel target for expanding the utility of PARPi in pancreatic cancer through conferring synthetic lethality

BackgroundPARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been licensed for the maintenance therapy of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer carrying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. However, mutations in BRCA1/2 are notably rare in pancreatic...

The Immunomodulatory Effect of Different FLT3 Inhibitors on Dendritic Cells

Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations or internal tandem duplication occur in 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. In these cases, FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) are approved for induction treatment and relapse. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains the recommended post-induction therapy for suitable patients. However, the role of FLT3i therapy after alloHSCT remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the three currently available FLT3i, gilteritinib, midostaurin, and quizartinib, in terms of their immunosuppressive effect on dendritic cells (DCs). DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells inducing T-cell responses to infectious stimuli. Highly activated DCs can also cause complications after alloHSCT, such as triggering Graft versus Host disease, a serious and potentially life-threatening complication after alloHSCT. Methods: To study the immunomodulatory effects on DCs, we differentiated murine and human DCs in the presence of FLT3i and performed immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and cytokine measurements and investigated gene and protein expression. Results: We detected a dose-dependent immunosuppressive effect of midostaurin, which decreased the expression of costimulatory markers like CD86, and found a reduced secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12, TNFα, and IL-6. Mechanistically, we show that midostaurin inhibits TLR and TNF signaling and NFκB, PI3K, and MAPK pathways. The immunosuppressive effect of gilteritinib was less pronounced, while quizartinib did not show truncation of relevant signaling pathways. Conclusions: Our results suggest different immunosuppressive effects of these three FLT3i and may, therefore, provide an additional rationale for optimal maintenance therapy after alloHSCT of FLT3-positive AML patients to prevent infectious complications and GvHD mediated by DCs.

Disease Characteristics and Outcomes of 493 Young Myeloma Patients Treated With Modern Therapies: A Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database Study.

Young patients ≤ 50 years old with multiple myeloma (MM) account for about 10% of cases and are underrepresented in the literature. We explored disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes following modern therapies of young MM patients using the Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) database. We included 493 patients ≤ 50 years old diagnosed with MM or plasma cell leukemia without concurrent amyloidosis or POEMS syndrome from January 1, 2010, to July 1, 2022. The median age was 46 years old (range: 25.6-50). Most patients fell into the R-ISS II category (72.7%), and 24.1% had high-risk cytogenetics. The majority of patients (89.9%) received a proteasome inhibitor-based first-line treatment, 92.1% received a stem cell transplant, and 65.6% had maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Median follow-up from initial treatment to patients' last follow-up was 48.5 (range: 0-155) months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45.0 months (95% CI: 40.2-50.0). Maintenance therapy post-ASCT improved median PFS to 52.3 months (95% CI: 43.1-68.2), compared to 23.6 months (95% CI: 20.0-34.8) without maintenance[p < 0.001]. Although the overall survival has not yet been reached in this young population, our reported median PFS of only 45 months highlights the urgent need to develop innovative treatments to induce more profound and durable responses.

Focal adhesion kinase inhibitors as maintenance therapy in a homologous recombination repair proficient high-grade serous ovarian cancer murine model

Focal adhesion kinase inhibitors as maintenance therapy in a homologous recombination repair proficient high-grade serous ovarian cancer murine model

Fuzuloparib as maintenance therapy among patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial

Fuzuloparib as maintenance therapy among patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial

Patterns in maintenance therapy use in advanced ovarian cancer patients: Real-world data analysis

Patterns in maintenance therapy use in advanced ovarian cancer patients: Real-world data analysis

Hormonal maintenance therapy for advance low grade serous ovarian carcinoma appears to be of benefit – That's a relief!

Hormonal maintenance therapy for advance low grade serous ovarian carcinoma appears to be of benefit – That's a relief!

Real-world progression-free survival among patients with homologous recombination-deficient epithelial ovarian cancer who received niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the CHAR1ZMA study

Real-world progression-free survival among patients with homologous recombination-deficient epithelial ovarian cancer who received niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the CHAR1ZMA study

Examining health-related quality of life outcomes among older patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in context with efficacy and safety findings: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

Examining health-related quality of life outcomes among older patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in context with efficacy and safety findings: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib versus placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer

A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of the use of rucaparib versus placebo maintenance therapy in metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer

Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy followed by dostarlimab plus niraparib maintenance therapy among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in the ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY trial

Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy followed by dostarlimab plus niraparib maintenance therapy among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in the ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY trial

Utilization of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy, with or without bevacizumab, in the treatment of patients with homologous recombination proficient, wild-type BRCA1/2 ovarian carcinoma

Utilization of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy, with or without bevacizumab, in the treatment of patients with homologous recombination proficient, wild-type BRCA1/2 ovarian carcinoma

The efficacy of valproate in acute mania, bipolar depression and maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.

This study aims to conduct an overview on the comparative efficacy of valproate in acute mania, bipolar depression and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). We performed an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497749). We searched Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Summary measures comparing valproate with placebo or other active drugs were described. We included 26 systematic reviews. For acute mania (31 RCTs, n=4376), valproate showed a significantly better response than placebo in two high-quality systematic reviews (RR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.71) (OR=2.05; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.20). No significant differences with lithium were found in most outcomes. Valproate had similar efficacy to quetiapine and lower efficacy compared with risperidone, with conflicting results when compared with olanzapine. In bipolar depression (7 RCTs, n=399), valproate was more effective than placebo in reducing depressive symptoms (OR=2.80; 95% CI: 1.26 to 6.18) and achieving remission (OR=2.4; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.29) (OR=2.15; 95% CI: 0.82 to 5.6), considering the results of three high-quality systematic reviews. No significant difference was observed with lithium, lurasidone, quetiapine or olanzapine plus fluoxetine, but valproate showed superior efficacy to aripiprazole, ziprasidone and agomelatine. In maintenance treatment (11 RCTs, n=1063), valproate was superior to placebo in preventing relapse of any mood episode in two high-quality systematic reviews (RR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.83) (RR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.83). No significant difference was found with lithium, olanzapine or lamotrigine. This overview highlights favourable results for valproate compared with placebo in all phases of BD, as well as presenting specific results in comparison with other active drugs. However, these results must be interpreted considering the methodological limitations of our study.