Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Treatment Research Articles

Comparative analysis of therapeutic plasma exchange vs. standard management in hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: triglyceride reduction and clinical outcomes.

The use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGP) remains controversial in the literature. This study compared the clinical outcomes of TPE versus conventional therapy in patients with HTGP. Fifty-five patients with HTGP were included. Patients were retrospectively compared in pairs: those who received TPE treatment and those who did not, those whose triglyceride level fell below 500mg/dL within 48h, and those who did not, those with and without persistent organ failure. The primary outcome was the percentage of triglyceride reduction within 48h. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, mortality, cost-effectiveness, and persistent organ failure. Percentage decrease in triglyceride levels, medical hospitalization costs, and length of hospital stay were higher in the TPE group compared to the non-TPE group (p < 0.05, for each). However, there was no difference regarding persistent organ failure and mortality (p > 0.05, for each). The length of hospital stay, average cost, persistent organ failure, and mortality were similar in both groups whose triglyceride level fell below 500mg/dL within 48h and those who did not (p > 0.05, for each). Among patients with persistent organ failure, average cost was higher in the TPE group compared to the non-TPE group (p < 0.05). An independent relation was found between the average cost and persistent organ failure, TPE, length of hospital stay, albumin, and urea values in all patients (p < 0.05, for each). The approach of using TPE for treatment of HTGP was not found to be superior to the conventional treatment. Randomized controlled studies with larger number of patients are needed to gain better understanding of this issue.

Investigation of the Effect of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for TAFRO Syndrome: A Pilot Study.

TAFRO syndrome is a rare systemic inflammatory disorder with a fatal course. Nevertheless, a definitive treatment strategy has not yet been established. Anti-inflammatory therapies, including glucocorticoid treatment and immunosuppressants, have not been satisfactory. Therefore, new treatment options are needed for patients with TAFRO syndrome. The effectiveness of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has mainly been reported in several case reports. In this case series study, we investigated the effect of TPE on TAFRO syndrome. We reviewed six consecutive cases with TAFRO syndrome treated at Shinshu University Hospital. All of them underwent TPE. A significant improvement in mean blood pressure, albumin, total bilirubin, and C-reactive protein was observed after TPE. Furthermore, early TPE treatment was suggested to have an impact on the prognosis. More intensive studies are needed to emphasize the overall conclusion obtained that TPE can be an effective/acceptable treatment option for TAFRO syndrome.

Multi-centers experience using therapeutic plasma exchange for corticosteroid/tocilizumab-refractory cytokine release syndrome following CAR-T therapy

The chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy significantly enhances the prognosis of various hematologic malignancies; however, the systemic expansion of CAR-T cells also gives rise to severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Despite the successful application of corticosteroids and tocilizumab in alleviating severe CRS in most patients, there are still individuals who experience life-threatening CRS without responding to the aforementioned therapies. In our retrospective cohort, we conducted an analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters, including inflammatory cytokines, in 17 patients from three centers who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for refractory CRS with or without ICANS following CAR-T products treatment. Our findings demonstrate a significant improvement in both clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters subsequent to TPE treatment. The rapid decrease in temperature and levels of inflammatory indexes indicates the remarkable scavenging efficacy of TPE against cytokine storm following CAR-T therapy. In conclusion, TPE may serve as a valuable and safe adjunct to corticosteroids and tocilizumab in the management of severe CRS resulting from CAR-T cell infusion. We eagerly await further prospective studies to validate this finding.

Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Neurology Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure involving the filtration of a patient's plasma to eliminate pathogenic components or address deficiencies. This technique finds varied indications in the pediatric age group, particularly in neuroinflammatory diseases. The objective of this study is to delve into our local experience with TPE, focusing on indications, outcomes, and complications among children with neurological diseases at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Conducted at the pediatric department of KAUH in Jeddah from November 2008 to July 2023, this retrospective cohort study examined 15 patients, revealing a notable male predominance with 12 male patients (80%) and three female patients (20%). About two-thirds of patients exhibited an average illness severity, with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 10.7 and anExpanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 4.8. The median length of hospital stay was 23 days, and in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), it was 8.5 days. Presenting symptoms included limb weakness (n = 6), loss of consciousness (n = 3), dysphagia (n = 3), photophobia (n = 1), and ascending paralysis (n = 1). The TPE was performed for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 7), myasthenia gravis (MG) (n = 3), transverse myelitis (TM) (n = 2), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) (n = 2), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cerebritis (n = 1). Twelve patients were admitted to the PICU, and mechanical ventilation was required for 10 patients. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, abnormalities were observed in 10 cases, while the remaining five either had normal results or did not undergo MRI. Most patients required five sessions of TPE (n = 7). The median age at the initiation of TPE was 13 years. Twelve patients improved with TPE treatment, while three did not. Complications observed during and following TPE included fever (n = 5), electrolyte disturbance (n = 5), hypotension (n = 3), hypocalcemia (n = 2), bradycardia (n = 2), vomiting (n = 1), tachycardia (n = 1), eye rash (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and bleeding originating from the TPE procedure site (n = 1). In conclusion, our study underscores the significance of TPE as a therapeutic modality, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing research to fully exploit its potential across diverse medical contexts for enhancing patient care. Our findings, consistent with prior research, reveal plasma exchange's (PLEX's) wide-ranging applications and complications in neurological disorders.

Oxidative Stress and the Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (Nrf2) Pathway in Multiple Sclerosis: Focus on Certain Exogenous and Endogenous Nrf2 Activators and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Modulation.

The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) suggests that, in genetically susceptible subjects, T lymphocytes undergo activation in the peripheral compartment, pass through the BBB, and cause damage in the CNS. They produce pro-inflammatory cytokines; induce cytotoxic activities in microglia and astrocytes with the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and other highly reactive radicals; activate B cells and macrophages and stimulate the complement system. Inflammation and neurodegeneration are involved from the very beginning of the disease. They can both be affected by oxidative stress (OS) with different emphases depending on the time course of MS. Thus, OS initiates and supports inflammatory processes in the active phase, while in the chronic phase it supports neurodegenerative processes. A still unresolved issue in overcoming OS-induced lesions in MS is the insufficient endogenous activation of the Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway, which under normal conditions plays an essential role in mitochondria protection, OS, neuroinflammation, and degeneration. Thus, the search for approaches aiming to elevate endogenous Nrf2 activation is capable of protecting the brain against oxidative damage. However, exogenous Nrf2 activators themselves are not without drawbacks, necessitating the search for new non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches to modulate OS. The purpose of the present review is to provide some relevant preclinical and clinical examples, focusing on certain exogenous and endogenous Nrf2 activators and the modulation of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The increased plasma levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) in response to TPE treatment of MS patients suggest their antioxidant potential for endogenous Nrf2 enhancement via NGF/TrkA/PI3K/Akt and NGF/p75NTR/ceramide-PKCζ/CK2 signaling pathways.

Systemic lupus erythematosus with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage.

Systemic lupus erythematosus with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage.

Therapeutic plasma exchange decreases plasma anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG without increasing the proximate incidence of COVID-19.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes both pathologic and protective immunoglobulins (Ig). SARS-CoV-2 immunity is partially mediated by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (SAb), which impair viral host-cell invasion. Nonetheless, the systematic effect of TPE on SAb concentration and SARS-CoV-2 immunity is unknown. Paired plasma waste specimens from the first (first-TPE) and last (last-TPE) TPE treatment were collected from 9 patients between July 21, 2021 and March 1, 2022. The effects of TPE on Ig levels were assessed by quantitatively comparing the SAb, total IgG, and total IgM levels first-/last-TPE treatment. Complementary qualitative assessment for these changes was achieved via protein electrophoresis (PEP) and immunofixation (IFE). A retrospective review was performed to investigate the incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections following TPE v. other treatment at the same outpatient apheresis/infusion center during the same time frame. Median SAb levels between the first- and last-TPE waste specimens decreased significantly from 424.6 AU/mL to 17.0 AU/mL (P = 0.004). Concordantly, PEP and IFE analysis demonstrated broad Ig decreases. Cumulative incidence of subsequent COVID-19 diagnosis at 30, 90, and 180 days post-procedure did not differ between the TPE v. other treatment groups (n = 709 total patients). TPE significantly reduced SAb levels, a marker of SARS-CoV-2 immunity, but did not appear to provoke increased incidence of COVID-19 infections. Further investigation of the kinetics of TPE-mediated SAb decrease and post-TPE recovery are warranted.

The Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (VMR) is a Biomarker of Vitamin D Status That is Not Affected by Acute Changes in Vitamin D Binding Protein.

25-hydroxyvitamin D[25(OH)D] may be a poor marker of vitamin D status due to variability in levels of vitamin D binding protein (VDBP). The vitamin D metabolite ratio (VMR) is the ratio of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D[24,25(OH)2D3] to 25(OH)D3 and has been postulated to reflect vitamin D sufficiency independent of variability in VDBP. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure that removes plasma, including VDBP, and may lower bound vitamin D metabolite concentrations. Effects of TPE on the VMR are unknown. We measured 25(OH)D, free 25(OH)D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D[1,25(OH)2D], 24,25(OH)2D3, and VDBP in persons undergoing TPE, before and after treatment. We used paired t-tests to assess changes in these biomarkers during a TPE procedure. Study participants (n = 45) had a mean age of 55 ± 16 years; 67% were female; and 76% were white. Compared to pretreatment concentrations, TPE caused a significant decrease in total VDBP by 65% (95%CI 60,70%), as well as all the vitamin D metabolites-25(OH)D by 66% (60%,74%), free 25(OH)D by 31% (24%,39%), 24,25(OH)2D3 by 66% (55%,78%) and 1,25(OH)2D by 68% (60%,76%). In contrast, there was no significant change in the VMR before and after a single TPE treatment, with an observed mean 7% (-3%, 17%) change in VMR. Changes in VDBP concentration across TPE parallel changes in 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D, and 24,25(OH)2D3, suggesting that concentrations of these metabolites reflect underlying VDBP concentrations. The VMR is stable across a TPE session despite a 65% reduction in VDBP. These findings suggest that the VMR is a marker of vitamin D status independent of VDBP levels.

Retrospective evaluation of therapeutic plasma exchange treatment in a pediatric intensive care unit: Single-center experience.

The aim of this study is to characterize the clinical indications, outcomes, and complications of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric intensive care unit. A retrospective study was conducted on critically ill patients who received TPE. A dataset of 672 treatments administered to 102 patients was analyzed. The most common indication for TPE was COVID-19-related clinical conditions, followed by sepsis (24.5%), neurological diseases (9.8%) and renal diseases (6.9%). None of our patients died due to TPE-related complications, and the most common complication during and after the TPE was hypotension (21.7%). Although TPE is riskier to provide to critically ill children, our experience indicates that it can be performed relatively safely in critically ill children with appropriate treatment indications. In particular, indications, onset time, number of sessions and other procedures should be standardized for the pediatric age group.

The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange therapy on veno-venous ECMO weaning success in severe COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Primarily, this study aimed to investigate the effect of TPE (therapeutic plasma exchange) treatment on successful ECMO weaning in severe COVID-19 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO. The study was applied retrospectively on patients over the age of 18 who were hospitalized in the ICU between January 1, 2020 and March 1, 2022. The study was performed on 33 patients, 36.3% (n: 12) of whom received TPE treatment. The rate of successful ECMO weaning was statistically higher in the TPE treatment group (without TPE: 14.3% [n: 3], with TPE: 50% [n: 6], p=0.044). The 1-month mortality was also statistically lower in the TPE treatment group (p=0.044). In the logistic analysis, It was found that the risk of unsuccessful ECMO weaning increased 6 times in those who did not receive TPE treatment (OR; 6.0, 95% CI; 1.134-31.735, p=0.035). TPE treatment may increase the success rate of V-V ECMO weaning in severe COVID-19 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the management of stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders: a case series and review of the literature.

Stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPSD) are a rare group of disabling neuroimmunological disorders. SPSD often requires immune therapies, especially in the setting of inadequate response to symptomatic treatments. The safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in SPSD remains uncertain. To describe the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TPE in patients with SPSD. A retrospective observational study. A retrospective review of SPSD patients seen at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) from 1997 to 2021 was performed. Patient demographics/history, examination/diagnostic findings, treatment response, and TPE-related complications were recorded. Assessment for any associations between clinical characteristics, including age, sex, clinical phenotype, and time on immunotherapy, and response to TPE 3 months after treatment was performed. A subgroup of 18 patients treated with TPE at JHH and 6 patients treated with TPE at outside institutions were evaluated for any change in usage of symptomatic medications 3 months after the TPE treatment. Literature review of SPSD and TPE was also conducted. Thirty-nine SPSD patients were treated with TPE (21 at JHH and 18 at outside institutions); median age 48 years, 77% female, median modified Rankin Scale 3; mean initial anti-GAD65 antibody titer was 23,508 U/mL. Twenty-four patients (62%) had classic SPS, 10 (26%) had SPS-plus, 2 (5%) had progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus, and 3 (8%) had pure cerebellar ataxia. All patients were on symptomatic treatments, 30 (77%) previously received IVIg, and 3 (8%) previously received rituximab. Four patients (10%) had a TPE-related adverse event. One developed asymptomatic hypotension, another had both line thrombosis and infection, and two had non-life-threatening bleeding events. Twenty-three (59%) patients reported improvement in symptoms after TPE. Of the subgroup of 24 patients evaluated for any change in usage of symptomatic medications 3 months after the TPE treatment, 14 (58%) required fewer GABAergic symptomatic medications. Literature review identified 57 additional patients with SPSD; 43 (75%) reported temporary improvement after TPE. The majority of patients treated with TPE had improvement. Moreover, most patients evaluated for any change in usage of symptomatic medications after the TPE treatment no longer required as much symptomatic medications months after TPE. TPE appears safe and well-tolerated in SPSD. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term efficacy of TPE in SPSD and identify which patients may benefit the most from TPE.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Management of Stiff Person Syndrome Spectrum Disorders: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Objective To describe the safety, tolerability, and response to TPE in patients with SPSD. Background Stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPSD) are a rare group of disabling neuroimmunological disorders. SPSD often require immune therapies especially in the setting of inadequate response to symptomatic treatments. The safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in SPSD is unclear. Design/Methods A retrospective review of medical records for patients with SPSD seen at Johns Hopkins Hospital was performed. Patient characteristics, exam findings, diagnostic studies, treatment response and TPE-related complications were recorded. We also conducted linear regression models to assess for possible predictive factors for TPE response. Literature review of SPSD and TPE was also conducted. Results Thirty-six SPSD patients were treated with TPE; mean age was 48 years, 81% female, and average anti-GAD65 antibody titer was 42352 U/mL (range, 0-309,902). Twenty-two patients had classic SPS, 10 had SPS-plus, and 3 had other phenotypes. Thirty-three patients were treated for acute exacerbations, and 3 were on maintenance TPE. There were 4 (11.1%) TPE-related complications (catheter infection, catheter thrombosis, hemorrhage), but no deaths or anaphylaxis. Twenty patients (55.6%) reported improvement in symptoms after TPE, 13 reported no change, and 3 reported worsening of symptoms. Of the 36 total patients who received TPE, 21 received TPE at Johns Hopkins Hospital for an acute exacerbation of their condition, with 12 requiring fewer anti-spasmodic medications 3 months after TPE treatment. There were no predictive factors in a positive treatment response to TPE. Literature review identified 42 more patients; 69% of these patients reported a temporary improvement in their condition. Conclusions We describe the safety and tolerability of TPE in patients with SPSD and show that TPE-related complications are uncommon and manageable. Additionally, many patients with SPSD derived improvement with TPE. Further studies could help inform clinicians when to use TPE in SPSD.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the pediatric intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective study

To study the indication for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and related complications in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of the children who received TPE in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hunan Children's Hospital, from March 2015 to March 2021. The indication for TPE and related complications were analyzed and compared with the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) indication categories. A total of 405 TPE treatment sessions were performed for 196 children, among whom 76 children (38.8%) also received continuous renal replacement therapy and 147 children (75.0%) survived. The children with neurological diseases had the highest survival rate of 93.1% (27/29). The top three indications for TPE were hematologic diseases (61/196, 31.1%), sepsis with multiple organ dysfunction (41/196, 20.9%), and liver diseases (36/196, 18.4%). The children with hematologic diseases received the highest number of 129 TPE treatment sessions. The subjects with ASFA category Ⅲ indications accounted for the highest proportion of 76.5% (150/196), followed by those with ASFA category Ⅰ indications (11.2%, 22/196), ASFA category Ⅱ indications (7.1%, 14/196), and unknown category (5.1%, 10/196), and no ASFA category Ⅳ indications were observed. The incidence rate of TPE complications was 12.3% (50/405), and the most common complications were pipeline coagulation (4.2%, 17/405) and hypotension (3.7%, 15/405). No serious adverse events were observed. TPE can be safely used for the treatment of critically ill children with indications in an experienced pediatric intensive care unit.

Efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange and convalescent plasma therapy in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a global health catastrophe since its first reported cases in late December 2019. Critically ill COVID-19 patients have been related to cytokine storms leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome and high mortality rates. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy improve clinically by removing inflammatory cytokines excess and using passive antibody-containing blood, respectively. This study aimed to evaluate TPE and CP treatment for moderate-to-severe COVID-19 infection. Method: The patients were randomly divided into TPE group (n = 10), CP group (n = 11), and control group (n = 10). This 1-week quasi-experimental study with a pretest–post-test control group design was conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Dr. Moewardi General Hospital and Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Hospital. The study comparison between groups included blood gas analysis profile (pH, base excess, PaCO2, PaO2, hematocrit, HCO3, total CO2, SaO2), FiO2, P/F ratio, COVID-19 severity, and D-dimer. The paired t-test was used to analyze every group's pretest–post-test mean difference. One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the mean difference across the three groups. SPSS version 22.0 for Windows was used to perform statistical analyses. Result: TPE and CP groups showed significant clinical-laboratory improvement than control (p &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, high clinical-laboratory improvement tendency was observed in CP therapy than TPE. Conclusion: The use of TPE and CP in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients has been related to improving clinical-laboratory outcomes.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for multiorgan dysfunction among critically ill pediatric patients with leukemia: A single-institutional experience.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has well-documented applications in the adult population, outlined by the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) 2019 guidelines. Limited data exist regarding the use of TPE in critically ill pediatric patients; however, these reports rarely include patients with oncological diseases. We highlight the use of TPE in the acute management of seven pediatric patients with leukemia treated at Children's Mercy Hospital ICU from 2015 to 2020, including TPE specifications, baseline and interval laboratory evaluation, and outcome measures. Analysis compared those who did (n=4) and did not (n=3) survive 30 days post-TPE. Multiorgan failure (MOF) prompted the initiation of TPE in 85.7% of patients, 57.1% of whom were also diagnosed with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Baseline laboratory evaluations prior to initiation of TPE were similar between the two groups. With subsequent TPE treatments, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactic acid decreased. CRP and lactic acid following the last TPE treatment were significantly higher for those deceased 30 days post-TPE (P = .023 and .031, respectively). No TPE-associated adverse events necessitated discontinuation of TPE treatment. Several surviving patients required chemotherapy dose reductions or alterations. Our cohort demonstrated MOF and HLH consistently as indications for TPE, currently ASFA category III indications (optimal role of apheresis is not yet established). Recognition of this treatment modality earlier in the clinical course for critically ill oncological patients may lead to the development of formal protocols that may result in earlier initiation of TPE and improved outcomes.

The association between therapeutic plasma exchange and the risk of mortality among patients critically ill with COVID-19: a meta-analysis.

Background: Cytokine storm has been widely known to contribute to the development of the critical condition in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and studies had been conducted to assess the potential aspect of cytokine storm elimination by performing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). However, contradictory findings were observed. The objective of this study was to assess the association between TPE and the reduction of mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted by collecting data from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data on the mortality rate of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with TPE plus standard of care and that of patients treated with standard of care alone were analyzed using a Z test. Results: We included a total of four papers assessing the association between TPE and the risk of mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients. Our findings suggested that critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with TPE had lower risk of mortality compared to those without TPE treatment. Conclusion: Our study has identified the potential benefits of TPE in reducing the risk of mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange is Safe and Efficacious in Normalizing Increased Plasma Viscosity Associated with COVID-19

BackgroundCOVID-19 associated hyperviscosity is a potential driver for the increased rates of thrombotic complications and multi-organ failure associated with severe COVID-19. Limited experience suggests a promising role for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) in COVID-19 management based on the hypothesis that clinical benefit is derived from reduction in plasma viscosity. However, systematic study evaluating the safety and efficacy of TPE in these patients has not been done.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of TPE in a subset of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and elevated blood viscosity in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).Study Design and MethodsThis study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of 3 hospitals in our health system, with a limited initial enrollment target of 20 patients. Participants included adult COVID-19 patients with moderate elevation in plasma viscosity (2.3-3.5 centipoise) or significant hyperfibrinogenemia (>800 mg/dL) that were not improving despite standard supportive care. Patients with bacterial or fungal coinfection or moribund patients were specifically excluded. Upon enrollment, patients were randomized 1:1 to the treatment group (1 plasma volume TPE with frozen plasma (FP) replacement on 2 consecutive days) or control group (continued standard of care (SOC)). Primary measures included the safety/tolerability of TPE and change in plasma viscosity levels after TPE versus SOC. Secondary measures included evaluation of various clinical and laboratory parameters, including fibrinogen and other coagulation-related markers, mortality, bleeding and thromboembolic complications, ICU length of stay and time to discharge after enrollment.ResultsPreliminary analysis of collected data demonstrates that TPE is safe and well-tolerated in these patients, with adverse events limited to one mild occurrence of tachycardia that improved upon decreasing the flow rate. There was significant decrease in plasma viscosity in the TPE treatment group, compared to the SOC control group. Secondary measures of select laboratory parameters also show a significant decrease in fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor (vWF), Factor VIII, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the TPE treatment group. No significant differences were seen in levels of fibrin monomer, total IgG, total IgM, total protein, or total albumin between the two groups. Data collection and analysis for clinical parameters are ongoing. Conclusions and RelevanceHere we report preliminary results suggesting that TPE is safe and effective for normalizing plasma viscosity in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Concomitant removal of large plasma proteins (fibrinogen, vWF) hints at their role in driving the increased viscosity associated with severe disease, which may contribute to clotting and end-organ damage in COVID-19. Based on lack of change in total IgG/IgM levels, TPE is not anticipated to hinder the patient’s humoral immunity by removing existing anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. These results warrant further studies on the utility of TPE to mitigate critical illness in COVID-19 patients.

Immunoglobulin G in Normal Plasma Inhibits HIT Antibody-Mediated Platelet Activation: Implications for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Treatment in HIT

Immunoglobulin G in Normal Plasma Inhibits HIT Antibody-Mediated Platelet Activation: Implications for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Treatment in HIT

Bleeding is associated with intravenous immunoglobulin and therapeutic plasma exchange use in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A propensity matched analysis.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are used in select cases with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a cross‐sectional analysis, a propensity matched sample was generated by IVIG or TPE treatment status to assess the primary outcome of mortality. In 500 HIT cases, IVIG or TPE was not associated with increased mortality (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.81–2.63, p = 0.2052) but was associated with a higher likelihood of major bleeding (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.03–2.96, p = 0.0376). The use of IVIG or TPE in HIT cases with bleeding contraindications to standard therapies should be further investigated.

Experience of therapeutic plasma exchange in rheumatic diseases: Albumin may be a suitable substitute for plasma.

Objectives In this study, we aimed to assess the value of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the treatment of rheumatic diseases and compare the safety of different replacement fluids used in TPE.Patients and methods A total of 727 TPE procedures in 285 patients (57 males, 228 females; mean age: 39.7±15.4 years; range, 13 to 79 years) with rheumatic diseases between January 2011 and February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Treatment response to TPE and adverse events were evaluated in all patients.Results Indications for TPE included 13 different disorders, with the majority being systemic lupus erythematosus (up to 50%). The mean number of TPE sessions was 2.55±1.00 per patient and the mean exchange plasma volume was 2,270±256 mL per session. Combined plasma and albumin was the most frequently used replacement fluid (69.5%), followed by albumin and plasma in 20.5% and 10.0% of episodes, respectively. Up to 73.7% (210/285) patients achieved clinical improvement after TPE treatment. Adverse events occurred in 15.1% (110/727) of all the procedures, and allergic reaction (34.5%) was the most common event. The overall incidence rate of complication was similar among the three types of replacement fluids (p=0.214).Conclusion Based on our study results, TPE is an invasive, but safe, useful and, sometimes, essential tool with an acceptable risk/benefit ratio for most rheumatic diseases. Albumin can be used as a feasible substitute for plasma in case of shortage of blood resources.