Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Research Articles

Risk factors for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children

To investigate the application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children and the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 66 children, aged ≤16 years, who underwent ERCP for pancreaticobiliary diseases at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from September 2013 to September 2023. The incidence rate of PEP and the risk factors for the development of PEP were analyzed. A total of 78 ERCP procedures were performed on 66 children, with 5 diagnostic ERCPs, 69 therapeutic ERCPs, and 4 failed procedures. The success rate of ERCP operations was 95% (74/78). There were 17 cases of PEP in total, with an incidence rate of 22%. In the PEP group, the proportion of children with normal preoperative bilirubin and the proportion of guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct during surgery were higher than in the non-PEP group (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct was an independent risk factor for PEP (P<0.05). With the increasing application of ERCP in children with pancreaticobiliary diseases, it is important to select an appropriate intubation technique during surgery to avoid blindly entering the guidewire into the pancreatic duct and reduce the occurrence of PEP.

Clinical Approach Strategy in Managing Complex Biliary Cases: Lesson learnt from a tertiary referral private hospital

Introduction: In the era of laparoscopic procedure, there are innovations on non-surgical management approaches for managing biliary tract disorders, such as therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). There is still no clear consensus yet in step-approach for managing difficult biliary disorders. Method: A retrospective endoscopy database study was conducted. Complex biliary cases which included in this study, where multi-management approach is needed, biliary obstruction accompanied with cholangitis or biliary sepsis, difficult CBD stone, recurrent CBD stone, or advanced progressive malignant biliary obstruction. Results: Sixty-one subjects in this retrospective database study were considered as complex biliary cases. In this study, 16.4% of the subjects underwent combination of therapeutic ERCP and EUS in one session based on the complexity of the case; and 8.2% of the subjects underwent therapeutic ERCP with additional single operator cholangioscopy procedure. One subject underwent rendezvous ERCP procedure through percutaneous approach. Around 4.9% of the subjects underwent EUS-guided biliary drainage procedure. Conclusion: Complex biliary cases require a good clinical approach algorithm to decide which procedure comes first based on comprehensive evaluation consists of patient’s factor, expertise, cost, and the risk of complications. Keywords: biliary tract; endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; endoscopic ultrasound; laparoscopic procedure

Radiation exposure in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with two types of fluoroscopy systems

AbstractFluoroscopy is necessary for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Occupational radiation exposure of staff (endoscopists, nurses, or assistants) is inevitable. Fluoroscopes with a tube over‐couch (OC) rather than under‐couch (UC) may have more radiation reflection dosage on the staff's upper body theoretically, where the most vital organs are. In the study, we assessed the radiation exposure on staff by two different types of fluoroscopes in real‐world practice. Using a radiation dosimeter to measure the radiation dosage on endoscopists and assistants in each ERCP procedure under two different fluoroscopic systems (UC vs. OC). Forty‐one ERCP procedures were enrolled. Dosimeters were used NanoDots for the measurement of personal radiation exposure. Those dosimeters were attached to the left forearm and chest of the endoscopist and only the chest of two assistants, the wall of the ERCP room, and the controlling room in every procedure. Nine‐teen ERCPs were performed under the OC unit, and the other 22 ERCPs were UC method. Fluoroscopic time and output of radiation dose showed no significant difference between the two groups. Radiation exposure in endoscopist were 0.0911[0.1041–0.3974] mGy (OC) versus 0.0276 [0.0080–0.2924] mGy (UC), p &lt; .01 for the forearm; and 0.0318 [0.0070–0.2628] mGy (OC) versus 0.0182 [0.0088–0.1628] mGy (UC), p = .04 for the endoscopist's body. There was no difference in radiation exposure from assistants in both groups. For all the ERCP procedures, the measurement of radiation exposure from high to low is endoscopist's hand, endoscopist's body, assistant 1, assistant 2, and ERCP room (p &lt; .01). Radiation detection from ERCP room is slightly higher but close to controlling room (p = .06). For the safety of occupational radiation protection, tube of fluoroscope UC is better than OC for the endoscopists more than assistants. Besides, the assistant 1 took higher radiation exposure than assistant 2 for each ERCP procedure.

Association between Cholecystectomy and the Incidence of Pancreaticobiliary Cancer after Endoscopic Choledocholithiasis Management.

(1) Background: Previous studies have raised concerns about a potential increase in pancreaticobiliary cancer risk after cholecystectomy, but few studies have focused on patients who undergo cholecystectomy after receiving endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis. This study aims to clarify cancer risks in these patients, who usually require cholecystectomy, to reduce recurrent biliary events. (2) Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database, the Cancer Registry Database, and the Death Registry Records to evaluate the risk of pancreaticobiliary cancers. All patients who underwent first-time therapeutic ERCP for choledocholithiasis from 2011 to 2017 in Taiwan were included. We collected the data of 13,413 patients who received cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and used propensity score matching to obtain the data of 13,330 patients in both the cholecystectomy and non-cholecystectomy groups with similar age, gender, and known pancreaticobiliary cancer risk factors. Pancreaticobiliary cancer incidences were further compared. (3) Results: In the cholecystectomy group, 60 patients had cholangiocarcinoma, 61 patients had pancreatic cancer, and 15 patients had ampullary cancer. In the non-cholecystectomy group, 168 cases had cholangiocarcinoma, 101 patients had pancreatic cancer, and 49 patients had ampullary cancer. The incidence rates of cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and ampullary cancer were 1.19, 1.21, and 0.3 per 1000 person-years in the cholecystectomy group, all significantly lower than 3.52 (p < 0.0001), 2.11 (p = 0.0007), and 1.02 (p < 0.0001) per 1000 person-years, respectively, in the non-cholecystectomy group. (4) Conclusions: In patients receiving ERCP for choledocholithiasis, cholecystectomy is associated with a significantly lower risk of developing pancreaticobiliary cancer.

Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography Pancreatitis in Children With Chronic Pancreatitis and Its Prediction Using 4-Hour Postprocedure Serum Amylase and Lipase Levels.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is seen in 3% to 16% of children undergoing therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). We evaluated the risk factors of PEP and utility of 4-hour post-ERCP amylase and lipase for early prediction of PEP in children with chronic pancreatitis (CP). Thirty children with CP (boys 20, 14.3 [interquartile range, 9.3-16] years) who underwent 62 ERCP procedures were studied. Clinical and procedural details with outcome were noted. Serum amylase and lipase were measured before, 4 hours, and 24 hours after ERCP. Multivariate analysis was done to identify risk factors for PEP. Cutoff scores of 4-hour amylase and lipase were identified. PEP occurred in 14.5% (9/62) of ERCP procedures (mild, 8; moderate, 1) with no mortality. On univariate analysis, endoscopic sphincterotomy ( P = 0.04), difficult cannulation ( P = 0.004), and prior PEP ( P = 0.036) were risk factors, while prior ERCP ( P = 0.04) was protective. Difficult cannulation (odds ratio, 5.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.329-25.592) was the independent risk factor on multivariate analysis overall and for first ERCP session alone. Amylase >3.3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) and lipase of >5 times ULN at 4 hours had best sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PEP. All cases with PEP were symptomatic by 6 hours and none had amylase/lipase <3 ULN at 4 hours. Amylase/lipase of <3 ULN at 4 hours could exclude PEP with good sensitivity (100%) and specificity (76% and 81%, respectively). PEP occurred in 14.5% of procedures in children with CP, with difficult cannulation being the independent risk factor. Asymptomatic patients with 4-hour amylase/lipase <3 times ULN can be safely discharged.

CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS IN A PATIENT CARRYING AN INTRAGASTRIC BALLOON. REMOVAL OR DIRECT ERCP?

CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS IN A PATIENT CARRYING AN INTRAGASTRIC BALLOON. REMOVAL OR DIRECT ERCP?

Microbial profile of biliary tract infection in patients undergoing therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and baseline risk factors predicting microbial growth and post-ERCP cholangitis

Microbial profile of biliary tract infection in patients undergoing therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and baseline risk factors predicting microbial growth and post-ERCP cholangitis

Performance and safety of diagnostic EUS FNA/FNB and therapeutic ERCP in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer - results from a population-based, prospective cohort study

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS FNA/FNB) and potential endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary decompression are indicated in patients with pancreatic cancer before initation of primary chemotherapy. This study aims to investigate the performance and safety of these two procedures in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: Endoscopy and pathology reports, and hospital records of consecutive patients with a radiological diagnosis of BRPC/LAPC included in a population based, protocol-driven study (NORPACT-2) were reviewed. Results: Of 251 patients, 223 (88.9%) underwent EUS-FNA/FNB, and 133 (53%) underwent ERCP. Repeated EUS attempts were performed in 33 (14.8%), eight (3.6%), and four (1.8%) patients. FNA was performed in 155 procedures, FNB in 30, and combined EUS-FNA/FNB in 83. Diagnostic accuracy was 86.1% for first EUS-FNA/FNB. The cumulative diagnostic accuracy for all attempts was 96%. False positive rate for malignancy was 0.9%. Of a total of 149 ERCP procedures, 122 (81.9%) were successful, and 27 (18.1%) were unsuccessful. Success rate of first ERCP attempt was 80.5% (107/133). Sixteen patients (12%) underwent a second attempt with a success rate of 93.8% (15 of 16). Combined EUS and ERCP was performed in 41 patients. Complications occurred in eight procedures (3%) after EUS-FNA/FNB, 23 procedures (15.3%) after ERCP, and four (9.8%) patients after combined EUS-FNA/FNB and ERCP. Conclusion: EUS-FNA/FNB and ERCP with biliary stenting in patients with BRPC/LAPC demonstrated acceptable performance and safety. Repeat procedures were performed with high success rates. Same session EUS-FNA/FNB and ERCP for biliary decompression is safe.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Children of Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction Without Obvious Biliary Dilatation

PurposeThere is no standard surgical approach for pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) without congenital biliary dilatation (CBD). This study aimed to compare outcomes between therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (LH) for pediatric patients of PBM without obvious biliary dilatation (PBM-nonOBD). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed demographic and clinical data of pediatric patients with PBM-nonOBD from 2015 to 2021. There were 33 patients in ERCP group and 35 patients in LH group. Primary outcomes included treatment efficiency, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. Univariate analysis was further used to explore prognostic factors for ERCP. ResultsThe mean diameter of the common bile duct in LH group was larger than that in ERCP group (8.6 ± 1.3 mm vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.003), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, clinical manifestations, complications, and other imaging findings. Compared with LH group, ERCP group had a shorter operation time and postoperative recovery time. The treatment effective rate of ERCP was inferior to that of LH (45.4 % vs. 85.7 %, p＜0.001). For postoperative adverse events, post-ERCP pancreatitis (15.1 %) was most common in the ERCP group. 30.3 % of patients eventually required LH. Intestinal obstruction (5.7 %), recurrent cholangitis (5.7 %), gastrointestinal bleeding (2.8 %), and anastomotic stenosis (2.8 %) were observed in LH group and 8.6 % of patients required a reoperation. A long common channel may be associated with poor prognosis after ERCP. ConclusionsERCP is associated with less surgical trauma, shorter recovery time, and fewer serious complications than LH, while the treatment effective rate of ERCP is inferior to LH. The indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy and the timing of radical surgery need to be further explored. Level of evidenceⅢ Study typeRetrospective Comparative Study.

Fewer endoscopists should perform more ERCPs.

This year, 2023, marks the fiftieth anniversary of the introduction of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which completely changed the management of biliary and pancreatic diseases. As in other invasive procedures, two intrinsically related concepts soon appeared: drainage success and complications. It was observed that ERCP is the most dangerous procedure regularly performed by gastrointestinal endoscopists, with a morbidity and mortality of 5-10 % and 0.1-1 %, respectively. ERCP is by far one of the best examples of a complex endoscopic technique.

Influence of Frailty in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Biliary Stone Disease: A Nationwide Study.

Pancreaticobiliary diseases are common in the elderly. To this end, frailty represents a state of vulnerability that should be considered when assessing the risks and benefits of therapeutic endoscopic procedures. We aim to determine the rate of readmissions and clinical outcomes using the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Using the National Readmissions Database, we identified patients with an admission diagnosis of cholangitis with obstructive stone from 2016 to 2019. Patients were determined to be of low frailty risk with a score of < 5, while patients of medium to high frailty risk had a score of > 5. During the study period, 5751 patients were identified with acute cholangitis with obstructing stone. Mean age of index admissions was 69.4years and 51.8% were female. From the total cohort, 5119 (89.2%) patients underwent therapeutic ERCP, 38.0% (n = 1947) of whom were regarded as frail (risk score > 5). Following ERCP, frail patients had a less but statistically insignificant readmission rate compared to non-frail patients (2.76% vs 4.05%, p = 0.450). However, compared to non-frail patients, frail patients experienced higher post-ERCP complications (6.20% vs 14.63%, p < 0.001). Frail patients were more likely to have longer lengths of stay, higher hospital cost, and mortality risk. ERCP is not a risk factor for readmission among frail patients. However, frail patients are at higher risk for procedure-related complications, healthcare utilization, and mortality.

Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Single Centre 5-Year Experience

Abstract: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and related procedures are established as necessary techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of biliopancreatic diseases. Caution is needed due to the high risk of complications that can be fatal. The main complications are pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, biliary stents, and lithiasis treatment issues. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic ERCP at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital between 2017-2021. This was a retrospective study using patients’ medical record data. The results obtained a total of 196 ERCP procedures performed at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital in that period. Variations of etiology, technical difficulties, and morbidities were recorded. The success rate of endoscopic stone extraction was 77.9 %, EPBD 10.71 %, and stenting for biliary drainage 97.3 %. Etiology varied from bile duct stone (74%); malignancies of the pancreas (8%), duodenum (2%), and periampullary (4%); Klatskin tumor (5.6%); and other malignancies (5%). Associated morbidities were melena 2%, pancreatitis 1%, and cholangitis 0.5%. In conclusion, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a reliable method for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases, shown by the low incidence of morbidities and mortalities. Keywords: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; biliopancreatic diseases

A rare pancreatic tumor mimicking chronic calcified pancreatitis.

A 48-year-old woman was admitted for severe upper abdominal pain, with impressive dilation and multiple high-density stones in the main pancreatic duct (PD). The patient was diagnosed with “chronic pancreatitis” and a therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was planned.

Outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation in comparison to mechanical lithotripsy for large common bile duct stone

Background: The management of common bile duct stone (CBDS) has changed drastically over the past two decades, as open surgery has been supplanted by per-oral endoscopic procedures. Currently, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard worldwide. After performing an endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBST), endoscopic therapy entails CBDS extraction using conventional procedures. Lithotripsy is an endoscopic procedure used to remove CBDS that are too large to be extracted using conventional techniques.Aim: The aim of the present work is to compare the results of endoscopic large balloon dilatation and mechanical lithotripsy for large CBDS.Subjects and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted on 60 cases undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangial pancreatography for large CBDS who were referred to out-case's clinic and in-case's wards of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy unit of Internal Medicine Department at Tanta University Hospitals December 2019 to February 2021. Cases were divided into two equal groups. Group I included cases undergoing endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) and Group II included cases undergoing mechanical lithotripsy (ML).Results: Success of CBDS extraction, Hb, PLT, TLC, albumin, PA, ALT, AST, creatinine and urea and CBDS parameters (diameter, CBDS size, CBDS number) after ERCP were insignificantly different between both groups. Total serum bilirubin, direct serum bilirubin and, Alkaline phosphatase after ERCP were significantly lower in EPLBD. However, Amylase and lipase were significantly higher in EPLBD.Conclusion: Despite that the endoscopic large balloon dilatation caused significantly higher pancreatitis, it showed lower TSB, DSB and ALP. However, both techniques showed no difference regarding the success of CBDS extraction and laboratory investigations.

Potential factors affecting success rate and long term outcome in single balloon enteroscopy-assisted therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis: a retrospective study

Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stenosis (PJS) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is difficult to treat. Single-balloon enteroscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (SBE-assisted ERP) is a safe way to treat PJS with the strength of minimally invasion and repeatability, but since its technical difficulty and few patient number, data on long-term outcomes remain limited. The optimal treatment is still unknown. We aim to study the safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcome of single balloon enteroscopy-assisted (SBE-assisted) therapeutic ERP in patients with PJS in this study. The clinical information of patients undergoing SBE-assisted therapeutic ERP from March 2016 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were diagnosed as PJS and without any contraindication for therapeutic endoscopy. Treatment details, postoperative complications, factors influencing technical success rate were evaluated. Long-term outcomes results were obtained by clinical or telephone follow-up. Sixteen patients with median age of 51 years were included in this study, surgical reconstruction methods including PD with Whipple reconstruction, PD with Child reconstruction, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PpPD) with Whipple reconstruction. Eight patients were successfully treated. No serious complications happened. Risk factors for the failure of pancreaticojejunal anastomotic site identification include the digestive tract reconstruction sequence, pancreaticojejunostomy method, pancreatic duct tube implantation, pancreatic duct width before surgery, and pancreatic fistula during perioperative period. The median follow-up time was 77.2 months, the mean indwelling time of the stent was 62.3 months [interquartile range (IQR), 6.8-153.7 months]. Two of eight patients developed recurrent PJS. The variation in body mass index (BMI) was +2.46 in the non-recurrence group compared to -1.09 in the recurrence group and -2.12 in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment failure group. ERP intervention should be carried out early once PJS occurs in order to increase success rate. BMI is a crucial indicator which can reflex PJS rehabilitation degree during follow-up. In order to reduce PJS recurrence rate, a wider pancreatic stent and a longer stent indwelling time are recommended.

Genetic and Idiopathic chronic pancreatitis display distinct clinical features at diagnosis.

A 4-year-old female was referred to our institution with acute pancreatitis due to a choledochal cyst. A protein plug was found to be deeply impacted in the main pancreatic duct. She underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by sphincteroplasty and extraction of the protein plug with a basket extractor. After the ERCP procedure, the patient successfully underwent total choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. In cases in which a huge protein plug is located deep in the pancreatic duct, therapeutic ERCP is useful as preoperative management for choledochal cyst excision with hepaticojejunostomy.

S2832 First Trimester Subcapsular Hepatic Hematoma Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly utilized to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases and is considered safe in pregnancy. We describe a case of ERCP indicated for choledocholithiasis in a newly pregnant patient which resulted in a very rare complication related to guide wire trauma. Case Description/Methods: A 24-year-old female presented to the emergency department with right upper quadrant pain, fever, leukocytosis, and obstructive jaundice. Bloodwork revealed she was 8 weeks pregnant. Imaging studies showed acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis with a dilated common bile duct of 1.2 cm. Therapeutic ERCP was performed with minimal use of fluoroscopy to reduce fetal exposure. Double wire technique was utilized and the bile duct was successfully cannulated with a 0.025 mm angled-tipped hydrophilic wire. Sphincterotomy was performed, followed by sphincteroplasty. The bile duct was swept with a 12 mm balloon but only one stone was extracted. To avoid further fetal fluoroscopy exposure, double plastic stents were placed into the common bile duct and a single pigtail plastic stent was placed into the pancreatic duct. The following day, she became hemodynamically unstable. Labs suggested an improved cholestatic pattern and improved leukocytosis post ERCP decompression. Due to worsening hepatocellular injury and hemodynamic instability, a computed tomography angiogram was performed. A 3.9 cm subcapsular hepatic hematoma with capsular retraction and parenchymal distortion of the superior right hepatic lobe was found. Interventional radiology catheter embolization was attempted. Aggressive conservative management with blood transfusions and close monitoring successfully stabilized the patient. The patient ultimately had a spontaneous abortion and returned for an outpatient ERCP with biliary stent removal and stone extraction. Discussion: Although a very rare complication, this case does highlight the possibility of angled-tipped hydrophilic guide wire hepatic trauma and clinically significant bleeding. When strongly indicated, ERCP should be performed in people who are pregnant, but exposure to fluoroscopy should be minimized. Similar cases hypothesize that liver injury is attributable to traumatic damage to the intrahepatic biliary tree and hepatic parenchyma by the ERCP guide wire.Figure 1.: Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a hypodense subcapsular collection on the right side of the liver. The bleed continues inferiorly and medially. A plastic pancreatic stent and a plastic biliary stent are also visible.

The reasonable therapeutic modality for biliary duct-to-duct anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation: ERCP or PTC?

ObjectiveTo compare the initial success rate, feasibility, and effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) for anastomotic biliary stricture after liver transplantation (LT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data collected during January 2015 to December 2021 from liver transplantation recipients who developed anastomotic biliary stricture after liver transplantation and treated by ERCP and/or PTC. The success rate, complications and patients’ survival rate of ERCP and PTC procedures was evaluated.ResultsForty-eight patients who underwent LT and were confirmed to have the anastomotic biliary stricture were enrolled. Overall, 48/48 patients underwent single or multiple ERCP procedures as the first line therapy; 121 therapeutic ERCPs (3.36 ± 2.53 ERCPs per patient) were performed in 36/48 patients successfully. All the 12 patients who failed ERCP tend to have special bile duct conditions such as overlong, angle shaped, and/or extremely narrowed bile duct and underwent PTC as an alternative treatment. The initial success rate of ERCP was 75% (36/48) while the success rate of ERCP for the 12 patients with special bile duct was 0% (0/12). PTC was an effective second-line treatment for those 12 patients who failed ERCP, and 58.33% (7 of 12 cases) were treated successfully. The average procedure time in PTC group was significantly lower than ERCP group (t=2.292, P=0.027). The feasibility of ERCP was associated with the anatomical shape of bile duct and the severity of the stricture site. Finally, the cumulative survival rate was 100% (12/12) in PTC group compared to 86.11% (31/36) in ERCP group (χ2 = 0.670, P=0.413).ConclusionERCP is the gold standard method for the diagnosis and effective intervention for the management of biliary complications after LT. However, its use in certain types of biliary complications (e.g., patients with severe anastomotic biliary stricture and those with overlong and angle shaped bile ducts) is not promising and associated with significant risk of complications. PTC and other interventions should be studied along with ERCP for patients for whom ERCP may not work. The feasibility and efficacy of primary management can be predicted by the noninvasive imaging examinations like Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) before the procedure, which may help with the choice of the most reasonable therapeutic modality and avoiding unnecessary financial burden and complications.

A novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel as an option for initial hemostasis in endoscopic sphincterotomy-related hemorrhage: a case series.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is a fundamental procedure of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with post-EST bleeding as a serious adverse event. Although there are various hemostatic methods for post-EST bleeding, there is no consensus regarding the treatment choice. PuraStat is a novel self-assembling peptide developed as a hemostatic agent. We report six cases of EST-related hemorrhage with initial hemostasis achieved using PuraStat. The cases were observed in four men and two women, with an average age of 77.8years. EST was performed for biliary drainage in four cases and for stone removal in two cases. Bleeding occurred during the same session as EST in five of six cases, with the remaining case showing bleeding 4days after EST. As all patients with EST-related hemorrhage presented oozing with stable vital signs, we selected PuraStat as first-line hemostasis in each case. We applied PuraStat using a dedicated catheter with the tip pressed against the bleeding point. Hemostasis was confirmed without additional procedure in all cases. No adverse events were noted after the procedures. As PuraStat hemostasis is effective, feasible, and safe for EST-related hemorrhage, PuraStat may be an option for initial hemostasis, although it is limited to oozing.

Safety of Nonagenarians Receiving Therapeutic ERCP, Single Center Experience.

(1) Background: The complication rates for nonagenarians receiving therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remain poorly understood. We aimed to determine whether nonagenarians were at an increased risk of ERCP-related complications. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective study on therapeutic ERCP in nonagenarians from 2011 to 2016 at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. A control group comprising patients aged 65 to 89 years was used to compare demographic data and the outcomes of therapeutic ERCP with the nonagenarians. The risk factors for complications were determined by logistic regression model. (3) Results: There were 35 nonagenarians and 111 patients in the control group. Overall, complication rates were not statistically different between the two groups. However, advanced age was an independent predictor of complications in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.12; p = 0.049). End stage renal disease (ESRD) was another independent predictor of complications (OR = 4.87; 95% CI = 1.11–21.36; p = 0.036). Post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding were more common in ESRD patients than patients without ESRD. (4) Conclusions: Although nonagenarians receiving ERCP did not have more complications compared to elderly patients younger than 90 years, advanced age and comorbidity still affect the outcome of therapeutic ERCP in the elderly patients.