Therapeutic Efficacy Of Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine Research Articles

Prevalence of mutation and phenotypic expression associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax

Therapeutic efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), which is commonly used to treat falciparum malaria, was assessed in isolates of Plasmodium falciparum (Welch, 1897) and Plasmodium vivax (Grassi et Feletti, 1890) ofAligarh, Uttar Pradesh, North India and Taif, Saudi Arabia during 2011-2012. Both the species showed mutations in dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) enzyme as they have common biochemical drug targets. Mutation rate for pfdhfr was higher compared to pvdhfr because the drug was mainly given to treat falciparum malaria. Since both the species coexist, P. vivax was also exposed to SP due to faulty species diagnosis or medication without specific diagnosis. Low level of mutations against SP in P. falciparum of Saudi isolates indicates that the SP combination is still effective for the treatment of falciparum malaria. Since SP is used as first-line of treatment because of high level of resistance against chloroquine (CQ), it may result in spread of higher level of mutations resulting in drug resistance and treatment failure in near future. Therefore, to avoid further higher mutations in the parasite, use of better treatment regimens such as artesunate combination therapy must be introduced against SP combination.

Therapeutic efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and the prevalence of molecular markers of resistance in under 5-year olds in Brazzaville, Congo

To test the efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyremethamine (SP) monotherapy and establish the prevalence of mutations in dhfr and dhps in Brazzaville, Congo. We recruited 97 patients aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated malaria who attended Tenrikyo public health centre. Eighty-three were followed until day 28. SP efficacy was determined by the WHO 28-day test and analysis of mutations in the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) genes. There were seven (8.4%) early treatment failures, 23 late treatment failures (27.7%), nine (10.8%) late parasitological failures and 44 (53%) adequate clinical and parasitological responses (ACPR). After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of 64 available samples, the corrected results there were 44 (68.8%) ACPR and 19 recrudescent cases (31.2%). Approximately, 97.5% of samples bore the Asn51Ile mutation, 66.2% the Cys59Arg mutation and 98.8% the Ser108Asn mutation. Mutations of dhps at positions 437 (Ala-Gly) and 436 (Ser-Ala) were found in 85% and 12.5% of samples. Quadruple mutations (pfdhfr triple mutations in codons 51, 59 and 108+ pfdhps mutation in 437) were found in 42 samples (52.5%) and associated with treatment failures. This high level of treatment failures and mutations in both genes calls for the urgent application of the new policy for malaria treatment to delay the spread of SP resistance.

A randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial on sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine alone or combined with artesunate or amodiaquine in uncomplicated malaria

The therapeutic efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) alone, SP plus amodiaquine (AQ), and SP plus artesunate (AS) was assessed in a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind trial among 438 children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in northern Ghana. Clinical and parasitological responses were monitored for 28 days following treatment; 86%, 98% and 97% of SP-, SP + AQ-, and SP + AS-treated patients achieved adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) within 2 weeks, respectively. Parasite clearance was better with SP + AS than with SP or SP + AQ treatment but re-infections were more common. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-corrected rates of ACPR at day 28 were 72.2% for SP, 94.1% for SP + AQ (P < 0.0001), and 94.5% for SP + AS (P < 0.0001). Gametocyte prevalence and density 1 week after treatment were highest in children treated with SP, and lowest in patients receiving SP + AS. No severe adverse events attributable to study medication were observed. In northern Ghana, more than one of four children suffered SP treatment failure within 4 weeks. Both SP + AQ and SP + AS are efficacious alternative therapeutic options in this region. Although SP + AS and SP + AQ treatments have virtually identical cure rates, rapid parasite clearance and pronounced gametocidal effects are the advantages of the former, whereas cost and a lower rate of late re-infections are those of the latter.

BLOOD FOLATE CONCENTRATIONS AND IN VIVO SULFADOXINE-PYRIMETHAMINE FAILURE IN MALAWIAN CHILDREN WITH UNCOMPLICATED PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM MALARIA

Folate antagonizes the antimalarial action of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in vitro, but its role in vivo is not well understood. We measured blood folate concentrations and SP therapeutic outcomes in Malawian children. Children with late treatment failure and those with adequate clinical and parasitologic responses had similar demographic characteristics, prevalence of parasite mutations conferring resistance to SP, and blood concentrations of anti-malarial drugs following treatment. However, a higher folate concentration was associated with late treatment failure. Patients from a low malaria transmission site had higher blood folate concentrations than those in a higher transmission site (mean +/- SEM = 39 +/- 9.3 ng/mL versus 29 +/- 10 ng/mL; P < 0.0001), and there was a higher rate of late treatment failure in the low transmission area (54.4% versus 40.2%; P = 0.010). This study also provides the first evidence of the independent role of physiologic folate concentrations in in vivo SP therapeutic efficacy, and the critical role of pyrimethamine concentrations in the therapeutic efficacy of SP when one controls physiologic folate levels and the frequency of critical dihydrofolate reductase/dihydropteroate synthase mutations.