Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Of Digoxin Research Articles

A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in children

This short communication introduced a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in children with the lower limit of quantitation of 0.2 ng/mL based on 30 μL of plasma. The plasma sample was pretreated by one-step protein precipitation. Then the chromatographic separation was performed on a short C-18 column with a total run time of 2.4 min. The detection was achieved through multiple reaction monitoring using positive ionization mode on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The linear range of digoxin in human plasma was among 0.2–6.4 ng/mL. The intra-day and inter-day accuracies of digoxin ranged from –6.0 % to 10.1 % and imprecisions were less than 8.8 %. The extraction recovery rate of digoxin in plasma samples was above 90 %. Matrix factor normalized by internal standard was within acceptance criteria. This method was fully verified and applied to determine the plasma digoxin concentrations of 43 pediatric patients. It is approved appropriate and practical for the therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in routine clinical laboratory practice, especially for children.

Comparison of DOS and Windows version of the MwPharm - a pharmacokinetic software for PK/PD monitoring of digoxin

Background and objectives: Digoxin is the oldest drug indicated for the treatment of systolic heart failure (HF). It is also useful in controlling excessive ventricular rate in the presence of atrial arrhythmias. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become an integral part of its prescription, allowing to optimize therapy and to reduce the incidence of toxicity. Since 1991, the MwPharm software package (Mediware, Groningen, The Netherlands / Prague, Czech Republic) has been used for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling in TDM, including digoxin. First Windows version with a broader spectrum was released in 2014, as a reaction of worse support of the DOS background on later versions of Windows. After its release, the company had decided to not develop DOS versions anymore, even though they are globally used with success. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of DOS and Windows version (WIN) of the MwPharm, and their prediction quality in TDM of digoxin.

Educational intervention to improve appropriate digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring: a quasi-experimental study

ObjectivesOur previous retrospecive study evaluating the appropriateness of serum digoxin concentration (SDC) measurements revealed errors in the timing of blood specimen collection in 98% of the tests. The aim of...

Therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in cardiac heart failure outpatients: comparisons of two analytical methods

Objective: To compare two analytical techniques used in the determination of plasma digoxin (LC-MS/MS and immunoassay) and to verify which one better answer the need of the clinical monitoring routine of patients with cardiac heart failure. Method: The clinical findings in 15 cardiac heart failure (CHF) outpatients of the Cardiac Heart Service of the Goias Federal University Clinical Hospital were investigated. Blood samples of the patients were collected and analysed by Immunoassay and by Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: The results of the statistic test (Student p = 0,05) showed a significant difference between the analytical methods: immunoassay concentrations were higher than the concentrations determined by LCMS/ MS. The explanation may be because immunoassay method measures digoxin plus other metabolites and endogenous substances, while the LC-MS/MS method measures only the digoxin molecule. None of the patients, showed relevant clinical data suggestive of digitalis intoxication, even several drugs with potential interaction were associated with treatment. Conclusion: It was concluded, therefore, that LC-MS/MS me thod is safer, more selective and specific than immunoassay, being an option for therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin, since the reference values would be obtain for digoxinemia by LC-MS/MS.

Clinical Repercussions of Analytical Interferences Due to Aldosterone Antagonists in Digoxin Immunoassays: An Assessment

Analytical interferences in digoxin immunoassays constitute a well-known problem, with repercussions for therapeutic drug monitoring. Clinically effective doses of spironolactone and potassium canrenoate cross-react in several digoxin immunoassays, producing falsely elevated or lowered concentrations. This study evaluates the interferences caused by these drugs in the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA III) in comparison with another 3 immunoassays used for digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring: MEIA II, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and enzyme multiplied immunoassay. The potential clinical implications of assay discrepancies in patient care are also assessed. To evaluate assay performance, in vitro specimens and real patient samples were measured using the 4 assays. Five serum pools were spiked with digoxin to achieve concentrations of 1 and 2.25 ng/mL digoxin and measured with the immunoassays before and after supplementation. Real samples from patients receiving digoxin (n = 39), digoxin and spironolactone (n = 35), or digoxin and potassium canrenoate (n = 4) were also quantified. The influence of ultrafiltration was evaluated in 3 pools from 29 additional patients. The implications of assay discrepancies for dose recommendations were also evaluated. In general, the results obtained for the in vitro and in vivo approaches coincided, confirming statistically significant differences in the assays regardless of the type of sample. MEIA III showed positive interference against the well-known negative interference attributed to MEIA II. According to Bland-Altman analysis, it is not possible to assume the interchangeability of the immunoassays evaluated. Thus, individual patients must be monitored with the same technique even in the absence of potential interferences. Discordant digoxin dose recommendations were estimated in 31% of patients not treated with interfering drugs and in 43% of cotreated patients. From a clinical perspective, analytical interferences in digoxin immunoassays are a real and frequent problem, which seems even more important in view of the lower therapeutic range now recommended.

筋ジストロフィー患者におけるシスタチンＣを用いたジゴキシン血中濃度シミュレーションの検討

A precise evaluation of renal function is necessary for the accurate therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin,a drug that is eliminated via the urine.However,the evaluation of renal function in muscular dystrophy patients tends to be problematic because muscular dystrophy is a muscle-wasting disorder which leads to a decrease in serum creatinine.In this study,we examined whether cystatin C would be more effective as an index than serum creatinine in the therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in 14 muscular dystrophy patients whose renal function was normal or slightly impaired.The serum concentration of digoxin was more closely correlated with reciprocal cystatin C levels (r=0.526)than reciprocal creatinine levels (r=0.435).Furthermore,when simulation serum concentrations of digoxin were calculated from the GFR obtained with Larsson’s formula and Grubb’s formula 2,which use cystatin C,there was a close correlation between simulation and measured serum concentrations of digoxin (Larsson’s formula ; r=0.694,Grubb’s formula 2 ; r=0.723).However,the simulation concentrations of serum digoxin were about half the measured concentrations (Larsson's formula ; y=0.602 x-0.056,Grubb’s formula 2 ; y=0.499 x-0.162)Our results indicated that cystatin C is a useful index for the therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in muscular dystrophy patients.Further,it would be possible to design the administration of digoxin for muscular dystrophy patients by substituting simulation digoxin concentrations in correlation formulas that we created.

Frequently discordant results from therapeutic drug monitoring for digoxin: clinical confusion for the prescriber

Digoxin remains a commonly prescribed medication for the treatment of congestive cardiac failure or atrial tachyarrhythmias. Its utility is offset by its narrow therapeutic index requiring regular blood concentration monitoring. Recent evidence suggests that a lower therapeutic range (0.5- 0.8 mg/L, or 0.6-1.0 nmol/L) is associated with reduced mortality in patients with congestive cardiac failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring for digoxin is carried out by immunoassays that are well established in routine clinical practice. Laboratories using different immunoassays may be involved in monitoring individual patients throughout the protracted course of therapy. These results should be concordant to ensure consistent dose individualization and optimum clinical management. We have investigated the discordance in digoxin measurements involving five different laboratories across the Adelaide metropolitan area. Aliquots from routine digoxin samples (n = 261) were analysed by accredited laboratories using commercially available immunoassays. The results showed that 119 (46%) of 261 samples were so varied that a different clinical outcome was indicated when reviewed by the treating physician. The differences between the highest and lowest readings from any one sample were also substantial, with 45% of the measurements exceeding 0.3 microg/L. Our study shows the considerable variation in the routine monitoring of digoxin. This makes therapeutic drug monitoring difficult to interpret and complicates clinical management when treating physicians are endeavouring to avoid toxicity and optimize dosing. These results raise a significant concern for the quality of therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin and have direct repercussions on patient care.

Measuring the Unbound Concentration Fails to Resolve Analytic Interferences in Digoxin Immunoassays

Therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin is well established in the clinical management of cardiac patients treated with the drug. Recently, target concentrations have been revised in patients with congestive heart failure to 0.5 to 0.8 microg/L, challenging the sensitivity limits of most immunoassays. These widely used methods are often criticized, particularly on specificity grounds resulting from interference from exogenous and endogenous sources. One solution to remove higher molecular weight interference has been to ultrafilter plasma samples before assaying. The present study included 261 patient digoxin samples and compared two commercial ultrafiltration devices (Centrifree and Micrcon) that share the same separation membrane (YM-30). The results showed widely discordant apparent unbound digoxin concentrations in the ultrafiltrate from these devices with a Deming regression line of Centrifree = 1.31 x Micrcon + 0.042 (95% confidence interval for slope of 1.237 to 1.391) and apparent unbound fractions ranging from 15% to 610% of the unfiltered plasma digoxin concentrations, suggesting that ultrafiltration did not resolve such interference issues. The concept of measuring lower unbound digoxin concentrations as a result of lower therapeutic range for total (bound plus unbound) digoxin will also render most immunoassays insensitive and inappropriately calibrated. There is a strong imperative to review digoxin monitoring practices in the light of current clinical imperatives for both specificity and sensitivity reasons.

Effect of plantain on therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin and thirteen other common drugs

Plantain, a herbal remedy, has been reported to interfere with therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin. We evaluated three commercially available plantain products for potential interference with therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin and 13 other common drugs. Dry content of plantain capsule or plantain leaf was extracted with either methanol or ethanol:water (60:40 by volume), added to drug-free serum and apparent digoxin was measured by both fluorescence polarization immunoassay and microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Using immunoassays, we also measured apparent concentrations of 13 other drugs (tobramycin, procainamide, tricyclic antidepressants, quinidine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, theophylline, valproic acid, amikacin, gentamycin, phenobarbital, salicylate and acetaminophen [paracetamol]) due to the presence of plantain. In separate experiments, a serum pool prepared from patients receiving digoxin was further supplemented with plantain and observed digoxin values were compared with original digoxin concentration. The presence of any cardiac glycoside in plantain was also investigated using thin layer chromatography (TLC). We observed no apparent digoxin in the presence of plantain in serum. Moreover, when aliquots of digoxin serum pool were supplemented with various amounts of plantain, the observed digoxin concentrations in the presence of plantain compared well with original digoxin concentration. TLC analysis did not show the presence of either digoxin or digitoxin in plantain products studied. Moreover, plantain did not affect immunoassay results of the 13 other drugs studied. The plantain products studied did not interfere with therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin as well as 13 other commonly monitored drugs.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Digoxin

Digoxin is a cardioactive drug with a narrow therapeutic range. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential in clinical practice for efficacy as well as to avoid digoxin toxicity. Immunoassays are commonly used in clinical laboratories for determination of serum or plasma digoxin concentrations. Unfortunately, digoxin immunoassays are affected by both endogenous and exogenous compounds. Endogenous compounds are termed 'digoxin-like immunoreactive substances' (DLIS), which are found in elevated concentrations in volume-expanded patients. Exogenous compounds that interfere with digoxin assays are various drugs such as spironolactone, potassium canrenoate as well as Digibind (Fab fragment of antidigoxin antibody), which is used in treating life-threatening digoxin overdose. Moreover, various Chinese medicines such as Chan Su, Lu-Shen Wan and oleander-containing herbal preparations also interfere with serum digoxin measurements by immunoassays. Monitoring unbound (free) digoxin concentration may under certain circumstances eliminate such interferences. Clinicians should be aware of limitations of therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin using immunoassays.

Appropriate dosing of antiarrhythmic drugs in Japan requires therapeutic drug monitoring*

In general, drugs are used in accordance with an approved dosage regimen in expectation of an appropriate balance between efficacy and toxicity. However, dose control of drugs with a narrow therapeutic range and marked intersubject variability in pharmacokinetics should be established through individualization of dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The purpose of this study was to examine differences between the approved dosage regimen and the doses of antiarrhythmic drugs and digoxin used in clinical practice and to examine the influence of TDM on dosing. Prescription research of antiarrhythmic drugs was performed at five national hospitals in Japan. Prescriptions for antiarrhythmic drugs (cibenzoline, disopyramide, pirmenol, mexiletine, aprindine, flecainide, pilsicainide, amiodarone and digoxin) were counted for the study period. The mean dose and dose distribution of the drugs were determined in each hospital. Comparisons were made of mean dose obtained in the study with the dosage approved by the authority. In addition, the percentage of patients that received TDM was determined. A difference was seen between the approved dosage and the actual dose. For all drugs except flecainide, the mean dose was smaller than the approved dosage. For all drugs except digoxin, remarkable variations were seen in the dose distribution among the hospitals. Digoxin showed a similar dose distribution among the five hospitals. Overall, the percentage of patients that received TDM was low except for Hospital A. However, TDM of digoxin was relatively common at four of the hospitals. It is concluded that, with the exception of digoxin, the appropriate dosing regimen for antiarrhythmic drugs is not yet established. The establishment of appropriate dosing regimens for antiarrhythmic drugs requires the more widespread adoption of TDM.

Properties of Novel Anti-digoxin Antisera in Radioimmunoassay Using Homologous and Site Heterologous Tritium-Labeled Antigens Involving a [3H]-Leucine Moiety

The specificities of antisera against digoxin C-3' or C-3'' hemisuccinate-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate were assessed by cross-reactivity studies with digoxin metabolites by radioimmunoassay (RIA) using the homologous and the site heterologous tritium-labeled antigens. One of the tracers used was digoxin 3'-hemisuccinyl-[3H]-leucine; the other was digoxin 3''-hemisuccinyl-[3H]-leucine, which had been prepared from digoxin 3''-hemisuccinate. When the tracer with [3H]-leucine at the C-3' position was used, antisera (I-1, I-3) elicited by digoxin 3'-hemisuccinate-BSA conjugate showed the following cross-reactivity: digoxigenin bisdigitoxoside (0.34%, 76%), digoxigenin monodigitoxoside (0.11%, 65%), digoxigenin (0.02%, 26%) and dihydrodigoxin (9.4%, 1.2%). However, when using the homologous antigen, antiserum (I-1) was highly specific against the digitoxose chain. When the site heterologous antigen, digoxin 3''-hemisuccinyl-[3H]-leucine was combined, this antiserum showed high cross-reactivity to digoxin degradation products. This digoxin RIA using antiserum (I-1) with the homologous antigen measures unmetabolized digoxin. On the other hand, the RIA system using antiserum (I-3) with the homologous antigen had cross-reactivity with the metabolites in accordance with their relative cardio-activities, so this system would be useful in therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin.

Cystatin C vs creatinine as markers of renal function in patients on digoxin treatment

Background: The kidney function is a major determinant of the serum concentration of digoxin as this drug is mainly eliminated unchanged through the kidneys. Since digoxin is widely prescribed among the elderly, and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines with age, it is important that the clinician takes the patient's GFR into account when prescribing digoxin. Serum cystatin C has been suggested to be superior to creatinine for estimation of GFR, which may have relevance for the optimization of treatment with digoxin. Methods: To evaluate which of the two GFR markers serum creatinine and serum cystatin C that best correlates with serum digoxin, we compared the serum levels of digoxin with the serum levels of creatinine and cystatin C in 149 patients on therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin at our hospital. Results: Overall, there was a stronger correlation between serum digoxin concentrations and cystatin C (p=0.00001) as compared to creatinine (p= 0.00003).Interestingly, of the patients with a serum digoxin concentration 1.5 nmol/L, 29% had a serum creatinine level within normal limits, as compared to 20% with normal cystatin C levels. Conclusions: In this study, serum cystatin C correlated better to serum digoxin than did serum creatinine. With improved GFR monitoring, digoxin concentrations should be better controlled.

Use of Digoxin Monitoring in a Hospital Setting as an Essential Tool in Optimizing Therapy

Objective To determine what triggers the use of digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) that adheres to established indications and the change in digoxin dosage after the result of monitoring is obtained. Methods This prospective study included 86 patients admitted to 6 medicine wards and 2 intensive cardiac care unit wards in a tertiary-care center. Data on patients' demographics, drug therapy, serum chemistry values, indications for digoxin therapy, indications for ordering the drug assay, timing of the blood sample relative to administration of the last dose, and physicians' decisions after attaining serum digoxin concentrations were collected. Results Eighty-six digoxin assays were evaluated. Indications for the use of a digoxin assay were mostly routine without a clear indication (66%); in only 22% of the assays were orders considered clinically justified. Eleven patients had concentrations >2 ng/mL, but only 8 patients had digoxin intoxication. In only 31% of patients did the medical staff respond to the results. In only 21% of patients with subtherapeutic drug concentrations was there a change in digoxin dose. Conclusions Although there are clear indications for the use of digoxin TDM, physicians seem to routinely order these blood tests. The clinicians did not adequately use the digoxin concentration data to optimize therapy. The assistance of a clinical pharmacist or pharmacologist is warranted for use of the assays, to optimize digoxin therapy.

Digoxin-like and digitoxin-like immunoreactive substances in elderly people. Impact on therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin and digitoxin concentrations.

We compared digoxin-like (DLIS) and digitoxin-like (DTLIS) immunoreactive substance concentrations for 30 people older than 65 years with those for 25 people younger than 50. None received digoxin or had liver disease, uremia, or volume expansion. We found no DTLIS in any specimen, and only 1 specimen from an elderly person demonstrated a low DLIS concentration. In addition, for 22 non-volume expanded patients (8 younger than 50 years and 14 older than 65) receiving digoxin, the fluorescence polarization (FPIA) and the microparticle enzyme (MEIA) immunoassays revealed comparable serum digoxin concentrations, indicating an insufficient DLIS concentration to interfere with digoxin immunoassay results. Therefore, elderly people who are not volume expanded do not have elevated DLIS or DTLIS concentrations. Furthermore, for patients with liver disease or uremia (18 older than 65 years and 20 younger than 50), the DLIS and DTLIS concentrations were elevated. Finally, for 5 patients with liver disease who received digoxin, serum digoxin concentrations were lower by MEIA and higher by FPIA, indicating the patients had elevated DLIS levels that interfered with the assays. Elevated DLIS and DTLIS concentrations are associated with volume expansion and not age.

Longitudinal assessment of a P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interaction of valspodar on digoxin.

Valspodar is a P-glycoprotein modulator currently under development as a multidrug resistance reversal agent in clinical oncology. A multiple-dose drug interaction study was performed to assess the influence of valspodar on digoxin, a substrate for P-glycoprotein. Twelve healthy volunteers received an oral digoxin loading dose of 1 mg on day 1, followed by 0.125 mg once daily to day 11. On day 7, a single oral 400-mg dose of valspodar was given, followed by a regimen of 200 mg twice daily from days 8 to 11. Serial blood samples and urine collections were obtained on days 6, 7, and 11 for digoxin pharmacokinetics and on days 7 and 11 for valspodar pharmacokinetics. On these days, blood pressure, pulse rate, and electrocardiograms were recorded at multiple time points. Coadministration of single-dose valspodar with steady-state digoxin on day 7 yielded an average 76% increase in digoxin AUC and a 62% decrease in digoxin renal clearance (both P = .0001). After a 5-day coadministration period, digoxin AUC increased by an average 211% and apparent total body clearance was decreased by 67% (day 11) compared with steady-state administration of digoxin alone (day 6). Contributing to the change in total body clearance were decreases in both renal clearance (73%) and apparent nonrenal clearance (58%). Both drugs were well tolerated throughout the study. There was no clinically relevant change in the effect of digoxin on vital signs or electrocardiographic parameters when administered with single- or multiple-dose valspodar compared with administration alone in volunteers with healthy cardiovascular systems. Coadministration of oral valspodar and oral digoxin resulted in a twofold to threefold increase in digoxin systemic exposure. On the basis of these data in healthy volunteers, an initial digoxin dose reduction of 50% would appear to be appropriate when beginning oral valspodar treatment. Throughout the period of coadministration, patients should be carefully monitored for clinical signs of digoxin toxicity in conjunction with digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring. Together, these should serve as the basis for individualized digoxin dose titration.

Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance in the elderly patient and its impact on the TDx digoxin assay.

This study was undertaken to examine the impact of endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substance (DLIS) on the therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin in elderly patients. Serum digoxin concentrations were detected by TDx digoxin assay in 220 patients 65 years of age and older who were not administered cardiac glycosides, spironolactone, or canrenone. The influence of clinical factors and laboratory parameters on the presence of DLIS was also evaluated. The concentration of DLIS averaged .07 ng/ml (range, 0-0.74 ng/ml), and in 25 subjects DLIS was observed over the detection limit of the assay. None of the parameters demonstrated a significant contribution to the presence of DLIS except one: continuous intravenous drip infusion therapy with a sodium-containing solution (DIV). The frequency of DLIS was significantly higher in the elderly subjects than in 121 control subjects younger than 35 years of age (p = 0.01). However, the difference became insignificant when subjects administered DIV were excluded from the analysis (p = 0.15). It was suggested that DIV may be clinically important in indicating the presence of DLIS.

Clinical relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin and gentamicin in the saliva of children.

Digoxin and gentamicin are widely used in pediatric medicine, and therapeutic monitoring is mandatory because of their narrow margin of safety and wide interpatient and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variabilities. Saliva sampling may be of potential interest, especially in children, in whom blood sampling is often difficult. In 11 children treated with digoxin for various cardiac conditions, and in 24 children treated with gentamicin (14 patients were administered gentamicin three times a day, and 10 once-daily), drugs levels were measured in plasma and saliva. There was no correlation between plasma total or free digoxin concentrations and saliva levels, precluding the clinical use of the saliva test for digoxin. No correlation was found between plasma gentamicin concentrations and saliva levels when the drug was administered three times a day; however, good correlation was found when the drug was administered once-daily (r2 = 0.89, p < 0.0001). Saliva may be used as a noninvasive method of measuring gentamicin serum concentrations to guide dosage adjustments in patients administered the drug once-daily.

Nighttime dosing assures postdistribution sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin

To study the appropriateness of phlebotomy for digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in outpatients, we conducted a retrospective chart review, a computer search of all previous TDM testing, and a questionnaire of all outpatients (n = 86) who had serum digoxin determinations between April 10 and April 28, 1992 (585 tests). In patients who took digoxin at the same time daily (40 patients, 300 tests), 52% of tests were performed on inappropriate samples drawn within 6 h of the last dose. No patient who took digoxin after 1700 had inappropriate tests. Phlebotomy for serum digoxin determinations before distribution of digoxin is complete is a common problem in outpatients, leading to clinically uninterpretable test results. Postdistribution sampling can be assured by nighttime dosing, and this recommendation has been implemented at our hospital.

Digoxin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Outpatients

Digoxin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Outpatients