Most often in business ethics, pluralistic approaches to decision making in organizations have been advanced in the context of groups, or collectives. To the end of expanding our theories on pluralism to the relatively unexplored individual level of analysis, we rely on Simone de Beauvoir’s Ethics of Ambiguity (1948). Firstly, we derive De Beauvoir’s Theory of Moral Agency. When then apply this theory to the phenomenon of moral disengagement in organizations to show that it is one and the same thing as avoiding one’s moral agency, as described by De Beauvoir. Building on De Beauvoir, we define a “pluralistic attitude” as a position an individual consciously adopts to cultivate an awareness and sensitivity to their own multiple, irreducible values being simultaneously relevant to decision situations. We demonstrate how and when the adoption of such an attitude can counteract moral disengagement by managers and executives.