Theoretical Minimal RNA Rings Research Articles

Evolution of small and large ribosomal RNAs from accretion of tRNA subelements

tRNAs presumably accreted into modern ribosomal RNAs. Previous analyses showed similar secondary structures for ancient rRNA subelements and theoretical minimal RNA rings, candidate tRNA ancestors rationally designed from tRNA-unrelated principles. Here, analyses test which tRNA secondary structure subelements resemble ancient/recent rRNA subelements. Results show that ribosomal RNA subelements evolved from structures resembling 1. Upper half part of the tRNA secondary structure; and 2. Towards structures resembling (a) tRNA 5′ stem-loop hairpins in large rRNA subunit and (b) tRNA lower half part in small rRNA subunit (stop and start codons conservation model). tRNAs and rRNAs presumably originated from the tRNA upper half part including the acceptor stem. Modern split 5′ and 3′ tRNA genes (spliced at anticodons) apparently reproduce ancestral-like states, because the acceptor stem protocode suggests acceptor stems evolved from spliced anticodon-like stem-loop hairpins, strengthening central roles for acceptor stem CCA-addition at translation origins. The Root-Bernstein hypothesis on the existence of tRNA structural symmetries presumably reflects late 5’ tRNA stem-loop hairpin duplications, some integrating rRNAs. Analyses of tRNA subelements similarities with rRNA subelements suggest tRNAs evolved and re-evolved by different duplication-fusions, along different structural subdivision models. Hence, sequential/parallel processes, perhaps in the same ancestral organism(s) produced polyphyletic tRNAs. Results confirm RNA ring usefulness for understanding prebiotic and early life evolution, and their similarities with primordial protein coding and tRNA genes.

Natural hypothetic oligonucleotide modifiers, activity regulators and theoretical minimal RNA rings ordering processes of expression and modification of genes / genome

A special hypothetical mechanism of variable Individual Epitope Reverse Translation (at least 2 types) of eukaryotic cell is probably capable of reproducing primary linear (sens- / antisense-, CRISPR-, repeat-like, etc.) and secondary conformational (similar to quadruplexs, RNA-hairpins, RNA-ring-structures; etc.) oligonucleotide structures formed in the mitochondrial membrane-bound supramolecular and containing nanomolecular inclusions hypothetical particle of the retranslosome. This is the so-called nucleic acid equivalents of protein epitope, oligo-NEs, monomeric in ~15–30 and oligomeric in ~(15–30)n nucleotides, potentially capable of participating in the regulation of expression (activation, termination, switching) and modification of genes / genome, as well as in the creation protein / enzyme-containing nucleoprotein platform- / module- / complex-like formations in normal, pathologically altered (in particular, tumor) and virus-infected cells. Recently, in the GenBank databases, they are shown realistically and built / calculated bioinformatically in silico so-called minimum theoretical of 22 nucleotides and longer RNAring (stem-loop) structures, the composition of which depends, firstly, on constantly occurring chemical and enzymatic processes (including deamination mutations), and the properties of which, secondly, link, respectively, with the early (era of the so-called circular code) and later (era of modern universal coding, including the circular code as a component) evolutionary periods of the formation of the whole genetic code. It is generally accepted that the emergence and formation, respectively, of early evolutionary (proto-tRNA, proto-rRNA) and modern variants of molecules of the translational machine of mitochondria and cytoplasm is associated with stem-loop RNA-ring structures, similar to independently proposed oligo-NEs, such as tRNA, rRNA and gene products of ribosomal and other proteins.

Negative CG dinucleotide bias: An explanation based on feedback loops between Arginine codon assignments and theoretical minimal RNA rings

AbstractTheoretical minimal RNA rings are candidate primordial genes evolved for non‐redundant coding of the genetic code's 22 coding signals (one codon per biogenic amino acid, a start and a stop codon) over the shortest possible length: 29520 22‐nucleotide‐long RNA rings solve this min‐max constraint. Numerous RNA ring properties are reminiscent of natural genes. Here we present analyses showing that all RNA rings lack dinucleotide CG (a mutable, chemically instable dinucleotide coding for Arginine), bearing a resemblance to known CG‐depleted genomes. CG in “incomplete” RNA rings (not coding for all coding signals, with only 3–12 nucleotides) gradually decreases towards CG absence in complete, 22‐nucleotide‐long RNA rings. Presumably, feedback loops during RNA ring growth during evolution (when amino acid assignment fixed the genetic code) assigned Arg to codons lacking CG (AGR) to avoid CG. Hence, as a chemical property of base pairs, CG mutability restructured the genetic code, thereby establishing itself as genetically encoded biological information.

Codon assignment evolvability in theoretical minimal RNA rings.

Genetic code codon-amino acid assignments evolve for 15 (AAA, AGA, AGG, ATA, CGG, CTA, CTG. CTC, CTT, TAA, TAG, TCA, TCG, TGA and TTA (GNN codons notably absent)) among 64 codons (23.4%) across the 31 genetic codes (NCBI list completed with recently suggested green algal mitochondrial genetic codes). Their usage in 25 theoretical minimal RNA rings is examined. RNA rings are designed in silico to code once over the shortest length for all 22 coding signals (start and stop codons and each amino acid according to the standard genetic code). Though designed along coding constraints, RNA rings resemble ancestral tRNA loops, assigning to each RNA ring a putative anticodon, a cognate amino acid and an evolutionary genetic code integration rank for that cognate amino acid. Analyses here show 1. biases against/for evolvable codons in the two first vs last thirds of RNA ring coding sequences, 2. RNA rings with evolvable codons have recent cognates, and 3. evolvable codon and cytosine numbers in RNA ring compositions are positively correlated. Applying alternative genetic codes to RNA rings designed for nonredundant coding according to the standard genetic code reveals unsuspected properties of the standard genetic code and of RNA rings, notably on codon assignment evolvability and the special role of cytosine in relation to codon assignment evolvability and of the genetic code's coding structure.

Theoretical minimal RNA rings mimick molecular evolution before tRNA-mediated translation: codon-amino acid affinities increase from early to late RNA rings

Nucleotide affinities for noncovalent interactions with amino acids produce associations between mRNAs and cognate peptides, potentially regulating ribosomal translation. Correlations between nucleotide affinities and residue hydrophobicity are explored for 25 theoretical minimal RNA rings, 22 nucleotide-long RNAs designed in silico to code for each amino acid once after three translation rounds, and forming stem-loop hairpins. This design presumably mimicks life's first RNAs. RNA rings resemble consensual tRNAs, suggesting proto-tRNA function, predicted anticodon and cognate amino acid. The 25 RNA rings and their presumed evolutionary order, deduced from the genetic code integration order of the amino acid cognate to their predicted anticodon, produces noteworthy associations with several ancient properties of the cell's translational machinery. Here we use this system to explore the evolution of codon affinity-residue hydrophobicity correlations, assuming these reflect pre-tRNA and pre-ribosomal translations. This hypothesis expects that correlations decrease with genetic code inclusion orders of RNA ring cognates. RNA ring associations between nucleotide affinities and residue hydrophobicities resemble those from modern natural genes/proteins. Association strengths decrease with genetic code inclusion ranks of proto-tRNA cognate amino acids. In silico design of minimal RNA rings didn't account for affinities between RNA and peptides coded by these RNAs. Yet, interactions between RNA rings and translated cognate peptides resemble modern natural genes. This property is strongest for ancient RNA rings, weakest for recent RNA rings, spanning a period during which modern tRNA- and ribosome-based translation presumably evolved. Results indicate that translation lacking tRNA-like adaptors based on codon-amino acid affinities and the genetic code pre-existed tRNA-mediated translation. Theoretical minimal RNA rings appear valid prebiotic peptide-RNA world models for the transition between pre-tRNA- and tRNA-mediated translations.

Comparisons between small ribosomal RNA and theoretical minimal RNA ring secondary structures confirm phylogenetic and structural accretion histories

Ribosomal RNAs are complex structures that presumably evolved by tRNA accretions. Statistical properties of tRNA secondary structures correlate with genetic code integration orders of their cognate amino acids. Ribosomal RNA secondary structures resemble those of tRNAs with recent cognates. Hence, rRNAs presumably evolved from ancestral tRNAs. Here, analyses compare secondary structure subcomponents of small ribosomal RNA subunits with secondary structures of theoretical minimal RNA rings, presumed proto-tRNAs. Two independent methods determined different accretion orders of rRNA structural subelements: (a) classical comparative homology and phylogenetic reconstruction, and (b) a structural hypothesis assuming an inverted onion ring growth where the three-dimensional ribosome’s core is most ancient and peripheral elements most recent. Comparisons between (a) and (b) accretions orders with RNA ring secondary structure scales show that recent rRNA subelements are: 1. more like RNA rings with recent cognates, indicating ongoing coevolution between tRNA and rRNA secondary structures; 2. less similar to theoretical minimal RNA rings with ancient cognates. Our method fits (a) and (b) in all examined organisms, more with (a) than (b). Results stress the need to integrate independent methods. Theoretical minimal RNA rings are potential evolutionary references for any sequence-based evolutionary analyses, independent of the focal data from that study.

Why Is AUG the Start Codon?: Theoretical Minimal RNA Rings: Maximizing Coded Information Biases 1st Codon for the Universal Initiation Codon AUG.

The rational design of theoretical minimal RNA rings predetermines AUG as the universal start codon. This design maximizes coded amino acid diversity over minimal sequence length, defining in silico theoretical minimal RNA rings, candidate ancestral genes. RNA rings code for 21 amino acids and a stop codon after three consecutive translation rounds, and form a degradation-delaying stem-loop hairpin. Twenty-five RNA rings match these constraints, ten start with the universal initiation codon AUG. No first codon bias exists among remaining RNA rings. RNA ring design predetermines AUG as initiation codon. This is the only explanation yet for AUG as start codon. RNA ring design determines additional RNA ring gene- and tRNA-like properties described previously, because it presumably mimics constraints on life's primordial RNAs.

Accretion history of large ribosomal subunits deduced from theoretical minimal RNA rings is congruent with histories derived from phylogenetic and structural methods

Accretions of tRNAs presumably formed the large complex ribosomal RNA structures. Similarities of tRNA secondary structures with rRNA secondary structures increase with the integration order of their cognate amino acid in the genetic code, indicating tRNA evolution towards rRNA-like structures. Here analyses rank secondary structure subelements of three large ribosomal RNAs (Prokaryota: Archaea: Thermus thermophilus; Bacteria: Escherichia coli; Eukaryota: Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in relation to their similarities with secondary structures formed by presumed proto-tRNAs, represented by 25 theoretical minimal RNA rings. These ranks are compared to those derived from two independent methods (ranks provide a relative evolutionary age to the rRNA substructure), (a) cladistic phylogenetic analyses and (b) 3D-crystallography where core subelements are presumed ancient and peripheral ones recent. Comparisons of rRNA secondary structure subelements with RNA ring secondary structures show congruence between ranks deduced by this method and both (a) and (b) (more with (a) than (b)), especially for RNA rings with predicted ancient cognate amino acid. Reconstruction of accretion histories of large rRNAs will gain from adequately integrating information from independent methods. Theoretical minimal RNA rings, sequences deterministically designed in silico according to specific coding constraints, might produce adequate scales for prebiotic and early life molecular evolution.

Pentamers with Non-redundant Frames: Bias for Natural Circular Code Codons.

The natural circular code consists of 20 codons (X0) overrepresented in the coding frame of protein-coding genes as compared to remaining noncoding frames, and X1 and X2 (N1N2N3 → N3N1N2 and N1N2N3 → N2N3N1 permutations of X0, overrepresented in + 1 and - 1 frames of protein-coding genes, not self-complementary). X0, X1 and X2 detect ribosomal, + 1 and - 1 frames. X0 spontaneously emerges in the 25 theoretical minimal RNA rings, 22-nucleotide-long circular RNAs designed to code once for each of the genetic code's coding signals (a start, a stop and each of the 20 amino acids) by three overlapping frames. RNA rings presumed ancient are biased for X1, and bias for X0 increases in presumed recent RNA rings, indicating an evolutionary X1-to-X0 switch. Here, analyses explore biases for X0, X1 and X2 in non-redundant nucleotide tetra- and pentamers, for different genetic codes. Biases for X0 occur in non-redundant nucleotide pentamers and seem stronger in nuclear than mitochondrial genetic codes; tendencies are opposite for X1. Strand-asymmetric replication presumably causes mitogenomes to escape Chargaff's rule which expects ratios A/T = G/C = 1 in single-stranded sequences. Hence, presumably X1 emerged in ancient genetic codes used in single-stranded protogenomes/coding RNAs; the self-complementary X0 presumably evolved secondarily with double-stranded genomes and strand-symmetric replication. Results indicate that selection for non-redundant overlap coding in short nucleotide sequences produced the natural circular code.

The Uroboros Theory of Life's Origin: 22-Nucleotide Theoretical Minimal RNA Rings Reflect Evolution of Genetic Code and tRNA-rRNA Translation Machineries.

Theoretical minimal RNA rings attempt to mimick life's primitive RNAs. At most 25 22-nucleotide-long RNA rings code once for each biotic amino acid, a start and a stop codon and form a stem-loop hairpin, resembling consensus tRNAs. We calculated, for each RNA ring's 22 potential splicing positions, similarities of predicted secondary structures with tRNA vs. rRNA secondary structures. Assuming rRNAs partly derived from tRNA accretions, we predict positive associations between relative secondary structure similarities with rRNAs over tRNAs and genetic code integration orders of RNA ring anticodon cognate amino acids. Analyses consider for each secondary structure all nucleotide triplets as potential anticodon. Anticodons for ancient, chemically inert cognate amino acids are most frequent in the 25 RNA rings. For RNA rings with primordial cognate amino acids according to tRNA-homology-derived anticodons, tRNA-homology and coding sequences coincide, these are separate for predicted cognate amino acids that presumably integrated late the genetic code. RNA ring secondary structure similarity with rRNA over tRNA secondary structures associates best with genetic code integration orders of anticodon cognate amino acids when assuming split anticodons (one and two nucleotides at the spliced RNA ring 5' and 3' extremities, respectively), and at predicted anticodon location in the spliced RNA ring's midst. Results confirm RNA ring homologies with tRNAs and CDs, ancestral status of tRNA half genes split at anticodons, the tRNA-rRNA axis of RNA evolution, and that single theoretical minimal RNA rings potentially produce near-complete proto-tRNA sets. Hence genetic code pre-existence determines 25 short circular gene- and tRNA-like RNAs. Accounting for each potential splicing position, each RNA ring potentially translates most amino acids, realistically mimicks evolution of the tRNA-rRNA translation machinery. These RNA rings 'of creation' remind the uroboros' (snake biting its tail) symbolism for creative regeneration.

Theoretical minimal RNA rings designed according to coding constraints mimic deamination gradients

Deaminations (A->G, C->T) increase with DNA singlestrandedness during replication, presumably creating spontaneous genomic mutational and nucleotide frequency gradients. Alternatively, genes are positioned to avoid deaminations. Deamination gradients affect directly mitogene third codon positions; conserved vertebrate mitochondrial tRNA and protein coding gene arrangements minimize deaminations in anticodons, and first and second codon positions in mitogenes. Here we describe deamination gradients across theoretical minimal RNA rings, 22 nucleotide-long RNAs designed to simulate prebiotic RNAs. These RNA rings code for a start/stop codon and a single codon for each amino acid, and form stem-loop hairpins slowing degradation. They resemble consensus tRNAs, defining potential anticodons and cognate amino acids. Theoretical minimal RNA rings are not designed to include deamination gradients, yet deamination gradients occur in RNA rings. tRNA homology produces stronger evidence for deamination gradients than RNA ring homology defined by coding properties. Deamination gradients start at predicted RNA ring anticodons, corresponding to known homologies between mitochondrial tRNAs and replication origins, and between bacterial tRNA synthetases and mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma. Deamination gradients are strongest for RNA rings with predicted anticodons matching cognate amino acids that integrated early the genetic code. Presumably protections against deaminations evolved while amino acids integrated the genetic code. Results confirm tRNA-RNA ring homologies. Coding constraints defining RNA rings presumably produce deamination gradients starting at predicted anticodons. Hence, the universal genetic code determines nucleotide deamination gradients in theoretical minimal RNA rings, suggesting adaptation to prevent consequences of deamination mutations. Results also indicate that the genetic code's structure determined evolution of tRNAs, their cognates, tRNA synthetases, and polymerases.

Bias for 3'-Dominant Codon Directional Asymmetry in Theoretical Minimal RNA Rings.

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases ligate tRNAs specifically with their cognate amino acid. These synthetases are among life's earliest proteins, class II tRNA synthetases (cognates A, D, F, G, H, K, N, P, S, and T) presumably preceding class I tRNA synthetases (cognates C, E, I, L, M, Q, R, V, W, and Y). Classification of codons into palindromic (structure XYX), 5'-dominant (YXX), and 3'-dominant (XXY) (Codon Directional Asymmetry [CDA]) shows that class II tRNA synthetases aminoacylate amino acids associated with XXY. Our working hypothesis expects bias for XXY codons in primordial RNAs, such as theoretical minimal RNA rings, designed in silico to mimic life's earliest RNAs. Twenty-five RNA rings have been computed, which code over a minimal length (22 nucleotides) for a start codon, stop codon, and one and only one codon for each of the 20 amino acids, and form stem-loop hairpins preventing degradation; these 25 minimal RNAs are the only ones matching these constraints and they seem homologous to consensus tRNA sequences. This similarity defined candidate RNA ring anticodons and corresponding cognate amino acids. Here, analyses of RNA ring codon contents confirm bias for XXY codons in 13 among 14 RNA rings with unequal XXY and YXX codon numbers. This bias increases with the genetic code integration order of the RNA ring's cognate amino acid across and within tRNA synthetase classes, suggesting that evolutionary processes, and not physicochemical constraints, produced the association between CDA and tRNA synthetase classes. The self-referential hypothesis for genetic code origin, a very complete genetic code evolutionary hypothesis integrating many translational machinery components, predicts best among genetic code evolutionary hypotheses CDA biases in RNA rings. The RNA rings' simple design inadvertently reproduces CDAs predicted by the genetic code's structure, confirming theoretical minimal RNA rings as good proxies for life's earliest RNAs.

More Pieces of Ancient than Recent Theoretical Minimal Proto-tRNA-Like RNA Rings in Genes Coding for tRNA Synthetases.

Theoretical minimal RNA rings were designed to mimick life's primordial RNAs by forming stem-loop hairpins and coding once for each of the 20 amino acids, a start and a stop codon. At most 25 22-nucleotide long RNA rings follow these criteria. These align well with a consensus tRNA sequence, predicting for each RNA ring an anticodon and an associated cognate amino acid. Hypotheses on cognate amino acid order of inclusion in the genetic code produce evolutionary ranks for theoretical RNA rings. This evolutionary hypothesis predicts that pieces of RNA rings with more ancient cognate amino acid should be more frequent in modern genes than those from RNA rings with late cognate amino acids. Analyses of genes for tRNA synthetases, among the most ancient proteins, from archaeal, bacterial, eukaryote and viral superkingdoms overall confirm these predictions, least for tRNA synthetases with early cognate amino acids and for the neogene-enriched genome of the giant virus Tupanvirus. Hence early tRNA synthetase genes and late RNA rings evolved separately. Results indicate that RNA rings and tRNA synthetases with the same cognate amino acid are less separated for relatively recent cognate amino acids, suggesting that over evolutionary time the components of the molecular apparatus became more integrated, perhaps in cell-like membrane-bound systems. Results confirm that theoretical considerations in the design of minimal RNA rings recreated RNAs close to the actual primordial RNA population that produce genes by accretion, and confirm the hypothesis of homology of minimal RNA rings with tRNAs and their proto-tRNA status.

Spontaneous evolution of circular codes in theoretical minimal RNA rings

Small circular RNAs occur in many cells. Theoretical considerations designed to mimick primordial RNAs designed 25 theoretical, minimal 22-nucleotide long circular RNAs (RNA rings) forming stem-loop hairpins, including one codon per amino acid, a start and a stop codon. These RNA rings resemble consensus tRNAs, whose predicted anticodons assign to each RNA ring a potential cognate amino acid. Assuming dual translator and messenger roles, three consecutive translation rounds produce 21-residue-long peptides, seven codons at each round. In these conditions, steric hindrances between tRNA(-like) translators competing for partially overlapping nucleotide triplets can be reduced if none of the seven codons produces by circular permutation (position 1 → 3, or position 3 → 1) any of the six others. This non-permutability of codon sets is one of the conditions that define potential circular codes regulating translational frame. A near-universal maximal self-complementary circular code exists in reading frames of natural genes, and permutations of this circular code define maximal circular codes in each +1, +2 gene frames. Chronologically scaling RNA rings according to the genetic code inclusion order of their cognate amino acid, codon numbers belonging to the natural frame +1 circular code X1 decrease with cognate amino acid inclusion order, those belonging to the natural frame 0 circular code X0 increase. RNA rings with early cognates apparently reflect pre-(tRNA-like)-adaptor translation by direct codon-amino acid affinity with partially overlapping consecutive codons where X1 regulated translation. Translation of non-overlapping consecutive codons evolved in parallel with RNA rings' cognate inclusion in the genetic code and with X0. Hence the complex “multi-frame” natural circular codes potentially evolved spontaneously from small coding circular RNAs mimicked by theoretical minimal RNA rings. Modern reading frames evolved from earlier reading frames corresponding to modern +1 frames.

Theoretical minimal RNA rings recapitulate the order of the genetic code's codon-amino acid assignments

BackgroundTheoretical minimal RNA rings form stem-loop hairpins coding for each of the 20 amino acids and a stop, presumably mimicking life's first minimal coding and self-replicating RNAs. They resemble consensual tRNAs. Mean amino acid positions in proteins follow the genetic code's consensual amino acid inclusion order, a 5′-late-to-3′-early amino acid gradient. HypothesisWe translated minimal RNA rings to test whether translated peptides share that gradient with modern proteins, using a) ribosomal translation, non-overlapping consecutive codons; and b) frameless translation advancing nucleotide by nucleotide, producing partially overlapping codons. ResultsFor frameless translation, most RNA rings code for a 5′-late-to-3′early amino acid gradient. Gradients indicate decreasing amino acid metabolic costs, from large to small amino acids. For ribosomal translation, the 5′-late-to-3′early amino acid gradient evolves from early to late RNA rings when ranked according to yields in Miller's experiment of their predicted anticodon's cognate amino acid. ConclusionsSimulations that produced in silico minimal RNA rings didn't account for coded amino acid properties. Yet, produced peptides remind actual proteins, and suggest ancestral frameless translation of partially overlapping trinucleotides advancing by single nucleotide steps, constrained by resource scarcity. Minimal RNA rings reflect the transition from frameless to ribosomal translation and are realistic candidates for ancestral tRNAs.

The production of methacrylic acid in Escherichia coli

Small circular RNAs occur in many cells. Theoretical considerations designed to mimick primordial RNAs designed 25 theoretical, minimal 22-nucleotide long circular RNAs (RNA rings) forming stem-loop hairpins, including one codon per amino acid, a start and a stop codon. These RNA rings resemble consensus tRNAs, whose predicted anticodons assign to each RNA ring a potential cognate amino acid. Assuming dual translator and messenger roles, three consecutive translation rounds produce 21-residue-long peptides, seven codons at each round. In these conditions, steric hindrances between tRNA(-like) translators competing for partially overlapping nucleotide triplets can be reduced if none of the seven codons produces by circular permutation (position 1 → 3, or position 3 → 1) any of the six others. This non-permutability of codon sets is one of the conditions that define potential circular codes regulating translational frame. A near-universal maximal self-complementary circular code exists in reading frames of natural genes, and permutations of this circular code define maximal circular codes in each +1, +2 gene frames. Chronologically scaling RNA rings according to the genetic code inclusion order of their cognate amino acid, codon numbers belonging to the natural frame +1 circular code X1 decrease with cognate amino acid inclusion order, those belonging to the natural frame 0 circular code X0 increase. RNA rings with early cognates apparently reflect pre-(tRNA-like)-adaptor translation by direct codon-amino acid affinity with partially overlapping consecutive codons where X1 regulated translation. Translation of non-overlapping consecutive codons evolved in parallel with RNA rings' cognate inclusion in the genetic code and with X0. Hence the complex “multi-frame” natural circular codes potentially evolved spontaneously from small coding circular RNAs mimicked by theoretical minimal RNA rings. Modern reading frames evolved from earlier reading frames corresponding to modern +1 frames.