Reviewed by: Paul, Politics, and New Creation: Reconsidering Paul and Empire by Najeeb T. Haddad Timothy Gombis najeeb t. haddad, Paul, Politics, and New Creation: Reconsidering Paul and Empire (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2021). Pp. xiii + 213. $100. This volume, a revision of the author's doctoral dissertation completed at Loyola University in Chicago (2018), critiques counterimperial interpretations of Paul. Haddad argues that Paul's theological outlook and instructions in his letters demand a more nuanced description than being either "anti" or "pro" imperial (p. 3). The first two chapters consider the state of the question and examine arguments that Paul's rhetoric was counterimperial. In a third chapter, H. explores the manner in which foreign cults existed within the Roman Empire. Haddad then describes, in chap. 4, the relationship of Paul's assemblies to associations as they existed in the ancient Greco-Roman world. His final chapter articulates the thrust of Paul's preaching, focusing on the distinction between kosmos ("cosmos") and kainē ktisis ("new creation") "and their cosmological and anthropological significance in Paul's eschatological soteriology" (p. 139). Haddad's opening chapter describes the state of play in scholarship and highlights substantive criticisms put to those who argue for a counterimperial Paul. He notes the diversity of its forms throughout various regions to support his claim that "the imperial cult was not a sort of unified doctrine across the Roman Empire" (p. 7). Further, the manner in which the emperor was regarded as a deity is ambiguous, at the very least. That the emperor was "divine" was more of an honorific title than a recognition that he held a place among the gods (p. 9). Sacrifices and prayers were not made to emperors, but rather on their behalf. H. regards this as important in order to demonstrate that it is misguided to compare as competing claims the attribution of the title divi filius to Augustus and Paul's reference to Jesus as "the Son of God." These terms function differently in Roman ideology and Pauline christology. In his second chapter, H. questions the claim that Paul's letters contain "coded speech" meant to undermine the empire by exploring "figured speech" in ancient rhetoric: "a rhetorical device that communicates a covert message" (p. 43). He notes that ancient rhetoricians commonly referred to three forms of such speech: implied meaning, deflection, and [End Page 327] saying the opposite. He reviews the circumstances in which these forms would be employed, along with how they would be created and detected, before then analyzing Pauline passages that interpreters claim to be hidden transcripts. Especially pertinent is Rom 13:1–7. Reviewing several proposals, H. finds that their claims do not hold up to close scrutiny against the conventions of ancient rhetoricians. Taking into account Paul's Jewishness, his noting that civil authorities are "servants" and not divinities is not a subversion but is consistent with how Paul's Jewish contemporaries regarded earthly rulers. And Paul was aware of Greco-Roman rhetoric, so the absence of clues indicating figured speech is notable. In treating the relationship of Roman imperial rule to the religious practices of subjugated peoples in far-flung locations, H. notes that there was little interest in converting foreigners to a Roman religion. While foreign cults within Rome itself would have invited more intense scrutiny and, occasionally, suppression, Rome was far more tolerant in the Greek east. Further, when it comes to identifying contemporaneous analogous social realities with the kinds of communities Paul saw himself creating and nurturing, H. asserts that Paul was creating something completely new (p. 129). This new reality, H. asserts in his final and concluding chapter, is the kainē ktisis, a new cosmic reality into which people are delivered by God, who rescues them from enslavement under various powers within the kosmos. According to H., this is the cosmic reality within which Paul conceives of the Roman Empire. Along with the kosmos, which is fading away in light of the dawning eschatological salvation God is bringing about in Christ, the Roman Empire will pass away and so is not a prominent target of Paul's rhetoric (p. 154). Overall, H. presents a satisfying account of how...
Read full abstract