STUDIES IN THE AGE OF CHAUCER The publication of these volumes prompts some general reflections on the direction of the Variorum Chaucer. The gap between the cutoff date of 1985 (p. xv) for citations in Andrew's work and the publication date must be a cause for some concern. In an age of advanced computer technology, such a hiatus is not easy to justify, even in a volume as substantial as this one. Clearly some further thought needs to be given to the factors that have occasioned such delay if future volumes are not to be in need of consider able revision by the time they are published. More fundamentally, one must wonder increasingly about the validity and purpose of the textual portions of this work. Is it in any real sense an edition at all? A variorum is, by definition, a record of annotation. The assembling of such commentary needs to be hung on some sort of textual peg. But the record of manuscript variants largely duplicates that in Manly-Rickert. Nor is it clear what value is served by the extensive, if unsystematic, collation of nonsubstantive printed editions, whose readings are of interest only at a small number of points. Would not much fruitless industry be avoided by simply keying the Commentary to the readings of a standard edition, like the Riverside, or even to those of a single manuscript, such as Hengwrt? For clearly the lasting value of this undertaking will be found only in the quality of its record of annotation, not in its text. And if future editors can match the standard of Andrew's scholarship, we will have much for which to thank the Variorum Chaucer. A. S. G. EDWARDS University of Victoria ANN W. AsTELL.job, Boethius, and Epic Truth. Ithaca, N.Y., and London: Cornell University Press, 1994. Pp. xiii, 240. $32.95. Ann Astell's ambitious goal in this well-written, innovative, and carefully argued study is to outline a new theory of literary-historical development, a theory that will account for the phenomenon that literary historians refer to as "the decline of epic and the rise of romance." The crux of Astell's challenging thesis is that two great works, the biblical Book of Job and Boethius's De consolatione phi/osophiae (as it was interpreted by Gregory the Great and other authoritative Christian exegetes), served jointly as models for the medieval formal and philosophical redefinition of the "epic truth" of 160 REVIEWS Homer and Virgil, especially in a significant portion of those narratives we group under the rubric of "romance." Astell's detailed account ofhow "epic truth" made its way through Job and Boethius into "romances" and other works by Dante, Chaucer, Spenser, Milton, and other writers is far too complex to summarize in the present brief review. I shall concentrate in stead on Astell's discussions of Chaucerian texts. In chapter 4, "Hagiographic Romance" (pp. 97-126), Astell treats the Clerk's tale of patient Griselda and the Man of Law's tale of Constance in light of the medieval explications ofJob and Boethius that have been set out in preceding chapters. Johan materials in The Clerk's Tale are of course not far to seek. Griselda echoes Job's "Naked came I out of my mother's womb" speech (Job 1:21) in The Clerk's Tale 871-72; Griselda's father, Janicula, echoes Job's cursing the day of his birth (Job 3:3) in lines 902903 ; and there is an explicit reference to Job, whose patience Griselda's is said to surpass in lines 932-38. Finding Boethius in The Clerk's Tale is another matter, however, and Astell fails to clinch her case because she is unable to cite unequivocal echoes of the De consolatione. In The Man ofLaw's Tale, Astell finds a "simultaneous confluence and opposition of Boethian and Johan themes" similar to that which she finds in The Clerk's Tale (p. 107). Reading The Man of Law's Tale as a satire, Astell concludes that Chaucer's primary satiric object was not the tale's sentimental and materialistic lawyer-narrator but "the popular piety" he is made to exemplify (p...
Read full abstract