Yellow (Et 4N)[Cu 5(SBu t ) 6] crystallises from solutions prepared from Cu(II), Bu t SH, Et 3N and Et 4NBr in acetone/ethanol, while (Et 3NH)[Cu 5(SBu t ) 6] crystallises from solutions of CuSBu t and Bu t SH in Et 3N. Crystal structure determinations reveal that both compounds contain the molecular cage [Cu 5(μ-SBu t ) 6] −, in which two copper atoms are three-coordinate (Cu trig), three copper atoms are two-coordinate (Cu dig), and all thiolate ligands are doubly-bridging. The polyhedral stereochemistry of the core is trigonal bipyramido-Cu 5- trigonal antiprismo-S 6. The complete [Cu 5(μ-SBu t ) 6] − cage in the Et 4N + compound closely approaches D 3 symmetry, but in the Et 3NH + compound one SBu t ligand is inverted at the sulphur bridge, causing angular distortions in the cage. Two structural features, the antiprismatic twist of the S 6 polyhedron and the bending of Cu dig towards the cage centroid (S-Cu dig-S = 171(1)°), provide evidence for weak Cu-Cu attractive interactions within the cage. Infrared data are discussed. Crystal data: (Et 4N)[Cu 5(SBu t ) 6], C 32H 74Cu 5NS 6, a = 45.500 (3), b = 11.805(1), c = 20.168(2) Å, β = 117.81 (1)°, C2/ c, Z = 8, R = 0.078 (2953 observed F); (Et 3NH)[Cu 5(SBu t ) 6], C 30H 70Cu 5NS 6, a = 10.519(1), b = 21.457(1), c = 20.065(1), β = 95.11(1), P2 1/ c, Z = 4, R = 0.072 (3093 observed F). (Et 4N)[Ag 5(SBu t ) 6] is isostructural with (Et 4N)[Cu 5(SBu t ) 6].
Read full abstract