Test For Endometriosis Research Articles

Non-invasive tests for endometriosis are here; how reliable are they, and what should we do with the results?

A reliable non-invasive biomarker for endometriosis is highly likely in the coming years. In the lead-up to this, clinicians need to be aware of commercially available tests as they become accessible, be aware of the level of evidence to support them and be prepared to counsel and manage patients who present with the results of such tests. One such test gaining popularity in Europe was developed using a machine-based learning algorithm to analyse thousands of microRNAs based on a 200-patient cohort with suspected endometriosis in France. We explore the background science for this commercially available test; outline the questions that remain to be answered; and caution against its use outside of a research setting.

Plasma urocortin-1 as a preoperative marker of endometriosis in symptomatic women

Accurate noninvasive diagnostic tests for endometriosis are still missing. This study evaluated the predictive value of the neuropeptide urocortin 1 (Ucn1) to detect pelvic endometriosis in symptomatic women. We enrolled prospectively 97 consecutive women submitted to gynecologic laparoscopy for chronic or acute pelvic pain, infertility or adnexal mass. Preoperative blood samples were assayed for Ucn1 using enzyme immunoassay. Patients with endometriosis had higher plasma Ucn1 levels compared to patients with no lesions (median 59 vs. 34 pg/ml, p < .01, Dunn's test). Elevated plasma Ucn1 levels were found among all endometriosis phenotypes (superficial peritoneal lesions, ovarian endometrioma, and deep infiltrating endometriosis, p < .05 vs. no lesions). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis identified plasma Ucn1 > 46 pg/mL as the best cutoff point to detect endometriosis vs. no lesions, with 76% sensitivity and 88% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] 0.827, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.695 − 0.959), but no cutoff could accurately distinguish endometriosis from other pathological conditions (AUC 0.593 [95% CI 0.474 − 0.711]). In women with chronic pelvic pain, infertility, or both symptoms, the probability of endometriosis (positive predictive value) increased consistently with the increase of plasma Ucn1 levels. The present findings suggest that high plasma Ucn1 levels increase the likelihood of endometriosis in symptomatic women.

R-157. Serum CEA, CA-125, CA-15.3 and CA-19.9 levels as a diagnostic test for endometriosis

R-157. Serum CEA, CA-125, CA-15.3 and CA-19.9 levels as a diagnostic test for endometriosis

Anti-ovarian antibodies: Potential screening test for endometriosis

Anti-ovarian antibodies: Potential screening test for endometriosis

The bubble test: a new tool to improve the diagnosis of endometriosis.

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical sensitivity and specificity of a bubbling phenomenon, including peritoneal surfaces, as a diagnostic test for endometriosis during laparoscopy. A prospectively controlled study of women with infertility of at least 1 year duration, who underwent laparoscopy, was conducted at a medical school-affiliated private infertility centre and research foundation. The study included 48 prospectively enrolled female infertility patients who underwent laparoscopy. Of these, 32 were found to suffer from endometriosis (group A) and 16 control patients did not show any evidence of disease (group B). The study involved the irrigation of the posterior cul-de-sac with short bursts of either saline or lactated Ringer's solution, utilizing a standard laparoscopic aspiration/irrigation system, and the subsequent observation for an excessive soap-like bubbling phenomenon (positive bubble test) in association with endometriosis. All 32 endometriosis patients (group A) demonstrated a positive bubble test. In contrast, only two of the 16 control patients (group B) were positive (P = 0.00242, Fisher's exact test; odds ratio, 8.000). A positive bubble test during laparoscopy was thus 100% sensitive and 88% specific for the diagnosis of endometriosis by laparoscopy, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 94 and 100% respectively. Since the literature provides considerable evidence that the diagnosis of endometriosis during laparoscopy is frequently missed, a positive bubble test during laparoscopy therefore may be considered a reason to search further (possibly with biopsies) for endometriosis in the absence of obviously visible disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)