Thrombophilia Testing Research Articles

Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop® and DOAC-Remove® on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with coagulation assays potentially leading to inaccurate results. This study determined the effectiveness of DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® in overcoming DOAC interference. It aimed to investigate the extent to which apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran had an effect on thrombophilia and lupus tests using normal plasma, as well as whether DOACs interfere with true-positive results by testing abnormal controls. Apixaban (0.03mg/mL), rivaroxaban (0.01mg/mL), and dabigatran (0.019mg/mL) stock solutions were made and added to the normal pool at three different concentrations (200, 400 and 600ng/mL) and to the abnormal controls at a single concentration. These samples and untreated DOAC controls were tested before and after adding either DOAC-stop® or DOAC-remove®. The measured parameters included protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII), DRVVS, DRVVC, PTT-LA and DOAC concentration. The normal pool spiked with DOAC was repeated seven times for each DOAC at each concentration level and the abnormal controls spiked with DOAC were repeated four times at a single concentration level for each DOAC. In the normal pool, dabigatran and rivaroxaban affected all lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas apixaban only affected DRVVS and DRVVC. While dabigatran led to false-positive protein S deficiency and falsely elevated ATIII. Both DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® brought the thrombophilia results and all falsely elevated lupus anticoagulant results back within the normal range for apixaban and rivaroxaban. For dabigatran all the affected lupus anticoagulant tests remained abnormal following DOAC-remove®, unlike DOAC-stop® treatment, where only DRVVS and DRVVC at 600ng/mL remained abnormal. In abnormal controls, all DOACs falsely elevated the lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas dabigatran caused false negative ATIII results, that were corrected (remained abnormal) with DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove®. DOAC-stop® showed a greater reduction in lupus anticoagulant results than DOAC-remove®, causing a false-negative DRVVT ratio for rivaroxaban. DOAC-stop® is more effective than DOAC-remove® in removing all DOACs below the reference range, whereas DOAC-remove® failed to remove dabigatran.

Thrombotic complications in pregnancy: a case-based review of the evidence

Pregnancy is a prothrombotic state due to an estrogen-driven shift in the coagulation system, increased venous stasis, and external restriction of blood flow caused by the gravid uterus. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnancy. Preventing, recognizing, and treating thrombosis in pregnancy, as well as the postpartum period, often challenges decision making in the clinical setting. In early pregnancy, guidance with respects to thrombophilia testing and anticoagulation in increasing the likelihood of live birth among patients with recurrent miscarriages is evolving. This review explores emerging data that support clinical decision making in thrombosis care in women with common thrombotic complications in pregnancy. The first case outlines VTE diagnosis in pregnancy, initial anticoagulation management, management around delivery and postpartum, and subsequent long-term anticoagulation treatment. The second case examines testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilia in the setting of recurrent miscarriage and the management of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Lastly, the third case reviews VTE risk assessment and prevention in pregnancy and the postpartum period, as well as duration and dose of postpartum thromboprophylaxis. Review of these common clinical scenarios surrounding thrombotic complications in pregnancy demonstrates recent advances in high-quality data, current gaps in knowledge, and variation in expert opinion. Ultimately, multidisciplinary discussion and teamwork remain key to optimal, safe care. Clinicians must prioritize collaborative, high-quality trials and prospective clinical management studies to better understand and define best practice in this population.

Comparison of Thrombophilia Assay Results for the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Plasma Standard from Different External Quality Assessment Providers-for the External Quality Assurance in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Group.

External quality assessment (EQA) is used to evaluate laboratory performance in tests of hemostasis; however, some esoteric tests are performed by too few centers in any one EQA program to allow valid statistical assessment. To explore the feasibility of pooling data from several EQA providers, an exercise was carried out by the External Quality Assurance in Thrombosis and Haemostasis group, using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) plasma standard for thrombophilia screening assays. Six EQA providers took part in this exercise, distributing the SSC plasma standard as a "blinded" sample to participants for thrombophilia tests between November 2020 and December 2021. Data were collected by each provider, anonymized, and pooled for analysis. Results were analyzed as overall results from each EQA provider, and by kit/method-specific comparisons of data from all providers pooled together. For each parameter, median results and range were determined. Over 1,250 sets of data were returned in the six EQA programs. The overall medians (all data pooled) were <4% of the assigned values for each parameter with the exception of protein C activity by clot-based assay. Method-related differences in median results were observed for free protein S antigen and protein S activity-a pattern seen across data from the different EQA providers. Antithrombin antigen results reported in mg/dL provided an example where small numbers of results for a single EQA provider may be supplemented by pooling data from multiple providers with good agreement seen among results reported by the different EQA providers. This study demonstrated that a multicenter EQA provider collaboration can be carried out and demonstrated benefit for assays with smaller number of participants. In addition, results showed good agreement with the assigned values of the SSC plasma standard. Further exercises for tests performed by only small numbers of laboratories can be planned.

Utilization of the Caprini risk assessment model(RAM) to predict venous thromboembolism after primary hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project(HCUP)

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the potential role of Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). No national study has investigated the role of Caprini RAM after primary THA/TKA.MethodsData from The National Sample of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) in 2019 were utilized for this study. The dataset consisted of 229,134 patients who underwent primary THA/TKA. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were considered as VTE. The incidence of thrombosis was calculated based on different Caprini scores, and the risk of the Caprini indicator for VTE events was evaluated using a forest plot.ResultsThe prevalence of VTE after primary THA/TKA in the U.S. population in 2019 was found to be 4.7 cases per 1000 patients. Age, body mass index (BMI), and Caprini score showed a positive association with the risk of VTE (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that a Caprini score of 9.5 had a sensitivity of 47.2% and a specificity of 82.7%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.693 (95% CI, 0.677−0.710). The highest Youden index was 0.299. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that malignancy, varicose vein, positive blood test for thrombophilia, history of thrombosis, COPD, hip fracture, blood transfusion, and age were significant risk factors for VTE. Based on these findings, a new risk stratification system incorporating the Caprini score was proposed.ConclusionsAlthough the Caprini score does not seem to be a good predictive model for VTE after primary THA/TKA, new risk stratification for the Caprini score is proposed to increase its usefulness.

F2c.*C20209T mutation in patients with a history of thrombosis: A case report, retrospective 2 site-results and review of the literature.

G20210A (c.*97G>A) prothrombin gene variant, found in white population has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Other rare polymorphisms in F2 gene (C20209T) have been reported, more rare and touching black people, but its potential association with VTE remain uncertain. About a 69 years-old Caucasian woman presenting an unprovoked deep venous thrombosis of the leg, we analyzed retrospectively 25.000 thrombophilia tests on a 11-year period of time (2007-2018), at Nice and Marseille University Hospitals, and performed extensive review of the literature. Genetic determination included a similar PCR protocol and sequencing. Twenty-one heterozygous cases out of 25.585 determinations (0.08%) was found. The C20209T mutation detected in our Caucasian patient is rare, with a frequency that differed from what was reported in the previous literature, mainly in non-Caucasian patients (Africans, Africans-Americans, and Caribbeans). One hundred and thirteen patients with this mutation have been described in the literature, of which only one homozygous. This study is the most important on C20209T mutation performed at present, allowing to precise its frequency and its potential role in venous thromboembolism.

High Prevalence of F2 20210G > A in Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients with Thrombosis in Atypical Sites.

Atypical sites for thrombosis include deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the upper extremity (UE-DVT), splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). In addition to specific pathogenic factors, their underlying mechanisms share similarities with typical venous thromboembolism (VTE), namely, DVT of the lower extremity and/or pulmonary embolism, but are less understood. Records of unselected patients with a history of typical VTE (n = 2,011), UE-DVT (n = 117), SVT (n = 83), and CVST (n = 82), who were referred to the Institute in Bonn for ambulatory thrombophilia testing, were retrospectively analyzed. Acquired and hereditary thrombosis risk factors were comparatively assessed. UE-DVT was characterized by a high rate (50.4%) of site-specific acquired risk factors. Compared with typical VTE, SVT was more frequently associated with systemic inflammation, infection, or malignancy (2.2 vs. 12.0%, p = 3·10-8) and the JAK2 V617F mutation was present in 16.9%. In CVST compared with typical VTE, demographics and higher rates of oral contraception (43.2 vs. 57.6%, p = 0.011) and pregnancy (4.2 vs. 10.9%, p = 0.012) suggest a significant hormonal influence on etiology. While the prevalence of inhibitor deficiencies and factor V Leiden mutation did not differ between cohorts, the prevalence of F2 20210G > A was higher in SVT (15.7%, p = 0.003) and CVST (15.9%, p = 0.003) than in typical VTE (7.0%). The cohorts with thrombosis in atypical sites showed distinctive patterns of acquired risk factors. Further studies are warranted to provide additional mechanistic insight into the role of hormonal influence in CVST and the contribution of F2 20210G > A to the development of SVT and CVST.

Elevated Lp(a) and thrombophilic mutations : the experience of a general hospital

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Thrombophilia and elevated Lp(a) levels have been studied as risk factors predisposing to cardiovascular events. There is no evidence suggesting that the common mutations causing thrombophilia or elevated Lp(a) alone could be regarded as independent risk factors for acute coronary syndromes. Purpose To compare the frequency of the simultaneous presence of thrombophilic mutations along with elevated Lp(a) levels in young patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with those without ACS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data from all the young patients (males&amp;lt;40yo, females &amp;lt;45yo) who were referred for thrombophilia testing to our hospital for a period of 10 years and divided them in two groups : those who presented with ACS (ACS group) and those who were referred for thrombophilia testing for other reason (non ACS group). Lp(a) level &amp;gt;30mg/dl was considered as elevated. We compared the frequency of elevated Lp(a) levels in patients carrying the same mutation in the two groups. P&amp;lt;0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results Of the 127 patients recorded in the ACS group, 25 were factor V Leiden homozygotes, 11 factor V Leiden heterozygotes, 17 PAI 4G/5G homozygotes, 8 PAI 4G/5G heterozygotes, 36 G20210A homozygotes and 12 G20210A heterozygotes. In the non ACS group, we analyzed data from 312 patients.Of them, 12 were factor V Leiden homozygotes, 29 factor V Leiden heterozygotes, 31 PAI 4G/4G homozygotes, 17 PAI 4G/5G heterozygotes, 66 G20210A homozygotes and 57 G20210A heterozygotes. Elevated Lp(a) levels were found as follows : (ACS vs non-ACS group) factor V Leiden homozygotes 14/25(56%) vs 1/12(8.33%) (p&amp;lt;0.01), factor V Leiden heterozygotes 7/11(8.66%) vs 2/29(6.89%), p&amp;lt;0.01), PAI 4G/4G homozygotes 1/17(5.88%) vs 0/31, PAI 4G/5G heterozygotes 0/8 vs 0/31), G20210A homozygotes 0/36 vs 1/66(1.51%), G20210A heterozygotes 1/12(9.44%) vs 0/57). Conclusions Lp(a) was elevated more frequently in patients carrying factor V Leiden mutation (either homozygotes or heterozygotes) who presented with ACS when compared with patients without ACS. Although it is not established, further studies are needed in order to identify any possible correlation of the combination of this mutation along with elevated Lp(a) levels with the occurrence of ACS in young patients.

Venous thromboembolism characteristics and outcomes among RIETE patients tested and untested for inherited thrombophilia

AbstractInherited thrombophilia (IT) workup is commonly pursued in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recent American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend a selective approach to IT testing, nevertheless, evidence on whether thrombophilia testing can actually improve patient-important outcomes through tailored management is limited. Data from the large, prospective Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry were analyzed to compare VTE risk factors, management, and outcomes between patients who were tested for IT and untested patients, during anticoagulant treatment and after its discontinuation. Among 103 818 patients enrolled in RIETE, 21 089 (20.3%) were tested for IT, 8422 (8.1%) tested positive, and 82 729 (79.7%) were not tested. IT testing was more frequent in patients with VTE provoked by minor risk factors and less common in those with major risk factors such as surgery or active cancer. Choices of anticoagulant treatment did not differ based on IT testing results. Untested patients exhibited inferior outcomes across all VTE categories, with higher rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, mortality, and notably, cancer-related mortality. After treatment discontinuation, IT-negative patients with surgically provoked VTE showed lower recurrence rates. For immobilization-related VTE as well as in estrogen-related VTE, no significant differences in recurrence rates were observed between IT-negative and IT-positive patients. However, IT-negative patients with pregnancy or postpartum-related VTE had significantly lower recurrence rates. Patients with unprovoked VTE, particularly those testing positive for IT, had high recurrence rates after treatment. These findings underscore the complex role of IT testing in managing VTE, supporting personalized treatment strategies that consider VTE risk factors and comorbidities. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02832245.

Thrombophilia testing for whom, why and when – a review of current practices

Thromboembolic conditions have accounted for 1 in 4 deaths worldwide in 2010. Thrombosis, which is the common pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism (VTE), is the leading cause of death (1/5 deaths in 1990). Hospital-acquired VTE accounts for approximately 60 percent of all VTEs annually. Others include cancer-associated thrombosis and gender associated risks. In addition to the disease burden, it also causes a significant economic burden world-wide. Multiple diagnostic tests and treatment, prolonged hospital stay and follow-up care, including management of recurrent VTE can be extremely costly. Therefore, it is important to focus on VTE prevention so that health care systems can save money, improve outcomes and save lives. In this background, it is important to have a clear direction as to when, how and whom to test for thrombophilia. Testing for thrombophilias is often performed without a clear understanding of the clinical implications of such results. Guidelines vary in the appropriate use of thrombophilia testing. In this review, these variations in thrombophilia testing and the implications mentioned in the recent guidelines and other articles are discussed. The review of such guidelines, guidance statements, review articles conclude that screening for hereditary thrombophilia has very limited advantage in the management of patients with thrombosis. Screening for antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) is more important given its high rate of recurrence in both venous and arterial thrombosis. Screening for underlying haematological conditions such as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is also considered important.

Decision theoretical foundations of clinical practice guidelines: an extension of the ASH thrombophilia guidelines

AbstractDecision analysis can play an essential role in informing practice guidelines. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) thrombophilia guidelines have made a significant step forward in demonstrating how decision modeling integrated within Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Developing, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology can advance the field of guideline development. Although the ASH model was transparent and understandable, it does, however, suffer from certain limitations that may have generated potentially wrong recommendations. That is, the panel considered 2 models separately: after 3 to 6 months of index venous thromboembolism (VTE), the panel compared thrombophilia testing (A) vs discontinuing anticoagulants (B) and testing (A) vs recommending indefinite anticoagulation to all patients (C), instead of considering all relevant options simultaneously (A vs B vs C). Our study aimed to avoid what we refer to as the omitted choice bias by integrating 2 ASH models into a single unifying threshold decision model. We analyzed 6 ASH panel's recommendations related to the testing for thrombophilia in settings of “provoked” vs “unprovoked” VTE and low vs high bleeding risk (total 12 recommendations). Our model disagreed with the ASH guideline panels’ recommendations in 4 of the 12 recommendations we considered. Considering all 3 options simultaneously, our model provided results that would have produced sounder recommendations for patient care. By revisiting the ASH guidelines methodology, we have not only improved the recommendations for thrombophilia but also provided a method that can be easily applied to other clinical problems and promises to improve the current guidelines’ methodology.

Thrombophilia Testing: from Genetic Predisposition to Discrimination

N/A for letters to the editor

Inpatient thrombophilia workup; does hematology consult prevent unnecessary testing?

Hypercoagulable disorders are best described as a group of acquired and hereditary conditions that increase the risk for the development of thrombi within veins or arteries. In the setting of an unprovoked venous thromboembolism, common practice in the inpatient setting has been further investigation via a thrombophilia workup to establish an underlying cause. Current Hematology-Oncology guidelines argue against inpatient workup as the results rarely influence inpatient management. Following American Society of Hematology guidelines (Middledorp), the current study found that only 15% (11/72) of patients met appropriate criteria for thrombophilia testing. There was no relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and diagnosis of thrombophilia or initiation of anticoagulation. There was a relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and Hematology-Oncology consultation. This demonstrates the need for expert consultation if thrombophilia testing is being considered. The current study provides more evidence that a strong recommendation against inpatient testing should be made as testing does not aid in diagnosis or change management and is an overutilization of healthcare resources.

Safety and efficacy of extended thrombophilia screening directed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis in live liver donors: do we really need extended thrombophilia screening routinely?

The study aimed to determine the prevalence of hereditary thrombophilia, and stratify its severity among live liver donors in Pakistan. Also, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of thrombophilia profile testing directed venous thromboembolic events (VTE) prophylaxis while balancing bleeding risk and the need for routine thrombophilia testing before live liver donation among living donor candidates. Protein S (PS), protein C (PC), anti-thrombin (AT) III, and anti-phospholipid antibody panel (APLA) levels were measured in 567 potential donor candidates. Donors were divided into normal, borderline and high-risk groups based on Caprini score. The safety endpoints were VTE occurrence, bleeding complications or mortality. Among 567 donors, 21 (3.7%) were deficient in protein C, and 14 (2.5%) were deficient in anti-thrombin-III. IgM and IgG. Anti-phospholipids antibodies were positive in 2/567 (0.4%) and 2/567 (0.4%), respectively. IgM and IgG lupus anticoagulant antibodies were positive in 3/567 (0.5%) and 3/567 (0.5%), respectively. VTE events, bleeding complications and postoperative living donors liver transplantation-related complications were comparable among the three donor groups (P>0.05). One donor in the normal donor group developed pulmonary embolism, but none of the donors in either borderline or high-risk group developed VTE. The mean length of ICU and total hospital stay were comparable. No donor mortality was observed in all donor groups. Due to thrombophilia testing directed VTE prophylaxis, VTE events were comparable in normal, borderline and high-risk thrombophilia donor groups, but more evaluations are required to determine the lower safe levels for various thrombophilia parameters including PC, PS and AT-III before surgery among living donor candidates.

The Role of Hereditary Thrombophilia Testing in Management of First-Time Pulmonary Embolism

Hereditary thrombophilia (HT) testing is frequently conducted during the evaluation of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the utility of routine HT testing in this setting is unclear. We sought to assess the association of HT with risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) following first-time PE. We conducted a multi-hospital retrospective study. Two hundred and ninety (290) patients with a first-time PE, who had been tested for HT, completed at least 3 months of therapeutic anticoagulation (AC), subsequently discontinued AC, and were followed for at least 36 months thereafter, were included. HT was present in 48 of the 290 included patients (17%). Median follow-up after discontinuing AC was 61 months (interquartile range, 43-79 months). The overall recurrence rate of VTE during follow-up was 58 per 290 (20%). A total of 47 of 242 patients (19%) in the HT-absent group had a recurrent VTE, compared with 11 of 48 (22%) in the HT-present group. There was no significant difference in VTE-free survival between groups on Kaplan-Meier analysis; the hazard ratio (HR) for VTE recurrence for those with HT compared to those without (HR HT-present: HT-absent) was 1.240 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.614-2.502; p=0.548). On multivariable analysis, HT was not associated with risk of recurrent VTE (HR 1.262; 95% CI 0.640-2.488), and the only variable associated with VTE recurrence was unprovoked PE (HR 2.954; 95% CI 1.64-5.314). These findings demonstrate that the presence of HT is not associated with the risk of recurrent VTE following first PE, and support limiting the use of HT testing among patients with first PE.

A Multicentric Verification of Hereditary and Acquired Thrombophilia Coagulation Assays

Aims: With an ever-growing number of patients being admitted to our University Hospital Sveti Duh (Zagreb, Croatia), there was a need to positively respond to clinicians' demands about hereditary and acquired thrombophilia testing.&#x0D; Study Design: An extensive and multicentric verification of coagulation assays included in thrombophilia testing was performed on the BCS XP coagulation analyzer (Siemens Healthineers, Marburg, Germany): antithrombin activity (AT) (Innovance Antithrombin), protein C activity (PC) (Berichrom Protein C), protein S activity (PS) (Protein S Ac), free protein S antigen (free PS:Ag) (Innovance Free PS Ag), activated protein C resistance (APCR) (ProC Ac R and ProC Global + Coagulation Factor V Deficient Plasma), lupus anticoagulant (LA) screening (LA1 and activated partial thromboplastin time by using Dade Actin FSL as reagent) and confirmation test (LA2), factor VIII activity (FVIII) (Dade Actin FS and coagulation FVIII Deficient Plasma).&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia, between January 2020 and December 2021.&#x0D; Methodology: Verification protocol included: the precision study (CLSI EP15-A3 protocol), trueness estimation by comparison of seventy remnant plasma samples with two large Croatian hospital laboratories with established thrombophilia testing, and verification of reference intervals and cut-off values (CLSI EP28-A3C and CLSI HA-60 guidelines).&#x0D; Results: All of the obtained imprecision CVs were within the manufacturer's claims (&lt;5/10/15%). While the observed bias for PC (+1.9%) was within the EFLM performance specifications (6.7%), the average bias for AT was higher than acceptance criteria (+10.8% vs 3.2% allowed). P&amp;B regression revealed a significant positive proportional difference (slope=1.14). Comparison of PS activity yielded a high negative bias (-33.4%) that exceeded the acceptance criteria of 8.1%. Regarding LA testing, the diagnostic accuracy was 99% when compared to Sestre milosrdnice UHC (N=70) and 95% when compared to University Hospital Centre Zagreb (N=19). All manufacturer's reference intervals and cut-offs were verified.&#x0D; Conclusion: The verification study confirmed all manufacturer's claims, except for PS which has been replaced with free PS:Ag determinations.

Leiden mutation (rs6025) in a severe COVID-19 pneumonia patient with Down syndrome: a clinical case

COVID-19 was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan (Hubei Province, China). Later, the pandemic of this disease took the world by storm, challenging the medical community. Its clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic to a severe course that requires hospitalization and intensive therapy with oxygen support. The mortality rate in patients with a severe course of COVID-19 can exceed 50% The majority of fatal cases of COVID-19 were associated with thrombotic events, despite the prophylactic use of anticoagulant therapy. Numerous theoretical overviews and research articles indicate the need for genetic testing in patients with COVID-19 to determine the genetic profile of proteins involved in thrombophilia. According to the researchers, the Leiden mutation (G1691A, rs6025) of the FV gene is one of the promising candidates for testing. The aim of the work was to demonstrate the clinical features of the severe course of COVID-19 in the presence of the Leiden mutation. 58 patients with COVID-19 of the intensive care unit were genotyped. The Leiden mutation in the heterozygous state was found only in one patient, who had Down syndrome. The Leiden mutation was detected with a frequency of 1.72% in the investigated group. The described clinical case clearly showed that individuals with Down syndrome, associated with hereditary thrombophilia are at risk of undesirable clinical consequences in the treatment of COVID-19. The condition of the patient with the Leiden mutation was severe when admitted to the hospital. The score according to the sequential organ failure assessment scale was 2 points. Bilateral multisegmental pneumonia was detected on the X-ray. On the second day after admission, due to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit, where he received oxygen therapy through a facial mask. Medical treatment was carried out according to the protocol: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibacterial therapy, anticoagulants, sympatho¬mimetics, and glucocorticosteroids. Despite the medical measures taken, progression of respiratory failure, renal failure, and portal hypertension was noted. On the 11th day, the patient developed asystole. Resuscitation measures were unsuccessful. Thus, the described case of a severe course of COVID-19 in a carrier of a heterozygous variant of the Leiden mutation with Down syndrome confirms the recommendations regarding the need for genetic testing for thrombophilia in high-risk groups and the appointment of personalized measures to prevent complications.

The dos, don'ts, and nuances of thrombophilia testing.

Considerable progress has been made in elucidating genetic and biologic risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite being able to identify heritable defects in a substantial proportion of patients with VTE, testing has not, in general, proven useful in management. Despite efforts to reduce inappropriate testing, it often falls to the hematologist to consult on patients having undergone thrombophilia testing. Through a series of cases, we discuss how D-dimer testing can be helpful in VTE recurrence risk stratification in younger women as well as how to approach patients with persistently elevated D-dimer levels in the absence of thrombosis. While elevated factor VIII coagulant activity levels are a significant risk factor for a first episode of VTE, its biologic basis is not fully understood, and studies have not shown it to be a useful predictor of recurrence. Abnormal results of genetic tests for methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase or plasminogen activator 1 promoter polymorphisms may be encountered, which carry little if any thrombotic risk and should never be ordered. We also discuss protein S deficiency, the most difficult of the hereditary thrombophilias to diagnose due to a wider "normal" range in the general population as compared with protein C, the presence of both free and bound forms in plasma, and the characteristics of the various assays in use. We also present a rare type of protein C deficiency that can be missed by functional assays using an amidolytic rather than a clotting end point.

To Test or Not to Test: Routine Thrombophilia Diagnostic Screening of Women with Reproductive Failures.

Recurrent reproductive failure is a global health issue affecting a significant number of women. Thrombophilias have been implicated as a possible cause. Inherited thrombophilias include a single nucleotide variant on factor V Leiden and prothrombin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the following single nucleotide variants: factor V Leiden (c.1601G>A), the prothrombin gene (c.*97G>A) and the reproductive failure in the Polish population. The study was conducted in a group of 545 patients with recurrent pregnancy loss, RPL (≥2 miscarriages), and in a group of 641 patients with infertility. The distribution of genotypes for the selected variants were determined by RFLP-PCR and by the real-time PCR method. A variant of the F5 gene was found in 5.14% of patients with RPL and in 6.08% of infertile women. A variant of the F2 gene was identified in 0.73% of patients with RPL and in 2.03% of women with infertility. The frequency in the study groups did not differ from that in the general population. No association between the studied variants of the F5 gene or the F2 gene and the predisposition to reproductive wastage was found. Recommendations for routine thrombophilia testing in women with recurrent miscarriages should be revisited. The decision regarding testing should be made individually depending on additional factors indicating an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

Budd-Chiari syndrome in children: Challenges and outcome

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an uncommon disease of the liver, characterised by obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow tract. The etiological spectrum of BCS as well as venous obstruction pattern show wide geographical and demographic variations across the globe. Compared to adults with BCS, children have primary BCS as the predominant etiology, earlier clinical presentation, and hence better treatment outcome. Underlying prothrombotic conditions play a key role in the etiopathogenesis of BCS, though work-up for the same is often unyielding in children. Use of next-generation sequencing in addition to conventional tests for thrombophilia leads to better diagnostic yield. In recent years, advances in radiological endovascular intervention techniques have revolutionized the treatment and outcome of BCS. Various non-invasive markers of fibrosis like liver and splenic stiffness measurement are being increasingly used to assess treatment response. Elastography techniques provide a novel non-invasive tool for measuring liver and splenic stiffness. This article reviews the diagnostic and therapeutic advances and challenges in children with BCS.

Complex Combination of Pulmonary Embolism, Stroke, and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Young Patient with Recent COVID-19 Infection and Newly Diagnosed Lung Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are very rarely all present in younger patients without classical risk factors or a family history of dyslipidemia or cardiovascular disease. They represent a medical emergency and necessitate fast diagnosis, treatment, and search for etiology, not explained purely by atherosclerosis. Thrombophilia testing should be considered in younger patients with several major thrombotic episodes, although there is much disagreement concerning the importance of homocysteine level testing in patients with arterial and venous thrombotic events, including PE. COVID-19 infection may trigger several thrombotic complications caused by unique immunothrombotic processes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old patient complaining of chest pain was admitted at our clinic due to acute anterior STEMI. He has a previous medical history of ischemic stroke, COVID-19 infection, and PE in the past 2 months. Newly, diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma was confirmed by biopsy 10 days before STEMI admission, without surgical or previous hemotherapy. The patient was on regular anticoagulant therapy with rivaroxaban 20 mg OAD and antiplatelet therapy with Aspirin due to previous PE and ischemic stroke. Patient denied standard risk factors, family history for cardiovascular disease or any previous minor or major bleedings, history of anemia, liver, or renal dysfunction. Acute stroke was confirmed by brain computed tomography imaging. Thrombophilia panel testing revealed homozygote mutations for MTHFR 677 gene, heterozygote mutation for integrin subunit alpha 2, and fibrinogen B beta chain) genes. The patient was treated with low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, and heart failure therapy in the acute phase. Clinical consultations were performed with a team of doctors which included a cardiologist, neurologist, and oncologist. Patients have a high bleeding risk, assessed by HAS-BLEED score of 4. CONCLUSION: Our patient is a rare case of serious multi-vascular thrombotic events with underlying thrombophilia, lung cancer, and past COVID-19 infection complicated by pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, and STEMI.