Testing For Fetal Aneuploidy Research Articles

Implementation of an Enhanced Prenatal Checklist to Increase Rates of Counseling of Prenatal Fetal Aneuploidy Testing.

Aim This study aims to assess the effect of implementing an enhanced prenatal genetic checklist to guide the provider's discussion on both screening and diagnostic options for fetal aneuploidy testing at the initial prenatal visit. Methods A retrospective quality improvement (QI) project was performed at a single, large, urban academic medical center. The implementation of this project was prospective; however, data was examined retrospectively after the QI initiative was implemented for three months. Patients were included if they were less than 24 weeks gestational age with a live intrauterine gestation at their initial obstetric (OB) visit. Patients less than 18 years old at the initial OB visit were excluded. The results were analyzed using the statistical software R. Chi-squared tests were used to examine proportional differences between the pre- and post-intervention groups with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics and documented genetic counseling discussions. Results A total of 416 patients were included in the final cohort. As measured by documentation, the rate of discussion of diagnostic prenatal genetic testing increased significantly from the pre-intervention proportion of 54% to the post-intervention proportion of 72% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with advanced maternal age, the rate of discussion of diagnostic prenatal genetic testing increased significantly from the pre-intervention proportion of 53% to the post-intervention proportion of 83% (p = 0.003), and the rate of genetics counseling referrals made at the initial prenatal visit increased significantly from 4% pre-intervention to 38% post-intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusions The use of an enhanced prenatal genetic checklist led to increased discussion of diagnostic fetal aneuploidy testing and increased rates of referral to genetics counseling.

Early detection of active Human CytomegaloVirus (hCMV) infection in pregnant women using data generated for noninvasive fetal aneuploidy testing

Prenatal hCMV infections can lead to severe embryopathy and neurological sequelae in neonates. Screening during pregnancy is not recommended by global societies, as there is no effective therapy. Recently, several groups showed that maternal-fetal hCMV transmission can be strongly reduced by administering anti-viral agents early in pregnancy. This calls for a screening method to identify at risk pregnancies at an appropriate gestational age, with the possibility for large-scale enrolment. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy screening early in pregnancy is already implemented in many countries and performed on a large-scale basis. We investigated the use of whole genome cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing data, generated for the purpose of NIPT, as (pre-)screening tool to identify women with active hCMV-infections, eligible for therapy. Coded raw sequencing NIPT data from 204,818 pregnant women from three testing laboratories were analyzed for the presence of hCMV-cfDNA. Samples were stratified by cfDNA-hCMV load. For validation and interpretation, diagnostic hCMV-qPCR and serology testing were performed on a subset of cfDNA-hCMV-positive (n=112) and -negative (n=127) samples. In 1930 samples (0.94%) hCMV fragments were detected. Validation by hCMV-qPCR showed that samples with high cfDNA-hCMV load tested positive and cfDNA-hCMV-negative samples tested negative. In 32/112 cfDNA-hCMV-positive samples (28.6%) the serological profile suggested a recent primary infection: this was more likely in samples with high cfDNA-hCMV load (78.6%) than in samples with low cfDNA-hCMV load (11.0%). In none of the cfDNA-hCMV-negative samples serology was indicative of a recent primary infection. Our study shows that large-scale (pre-)screening for both genetic fetal aberrations and active maternal hCMV infections during pregnancy can be combined in one cfDNA sequencing test, performed on a single blood sample, drawn in the first trimester of pregnancy. This work was partly funded by the Prenatal Screening Foundation Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Understanding knowledge, perception, and willingness of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a survey among Chinese high-risk pregnant women.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is utilized for screening the likelihood of fetal aneuploidy, presenting the benefits of non-invasiveness, high sensitivity, and specificity. Its application in prenatal screening has become ubiquitous. The inquiry into how pregnant women comprehend and determine NIPT screening strategies is paramount. Regrettably, there has been a dearth of research on this subject in China. Consequently, this study scrutinizes pregnant women's cognizance and perspectives concerning NIPT, furnishing a foundation for advancing its judicious implementation. From February 2021 to December 2022, a questionnaire survey was conducted among pregnant women receiving prenatal care and screening at the Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, who were randomly selected from a pool of individuals exhibiting a high risk of fetal aneuploidy on serological screening. The survey aimed to gather data on participant characteristics, knowledge, perception, and willingness concerning NIPT. The study employed chi-square and Kruskal Wallis tests to analyze subgroup differences. A total of 226 valid questionnaires were obtained. 83.2% of women pregnant women identified as high risk by serological screening would opt for NIPT, with 66.4% indicating that they would prefer NIPT for fetal aneuploidy screening in future pregnancies. These findings suggest a notable willingness among pregnant women to undergo NIPT. Additionally, the results suggest that various factors, including place of residence, educational level, family income, causes of abortion, and conception method, influence pregnant women's knowledge about NIPT Accordingly, the level of NIPT knowledge varies among pregnant women. The survey generally revealed that pregnant women were strongly inclined to select NIPT; however, expectant Chinese mothers possess limited knowledge and perception regarding this screening method for fetal aneuploidy. Therefore, the government must implement effective measures to augment public awareness of fetal aneuploidy screening and encourage the judicious utilization of NIPT.

NanoNIPT: Short-fragment nanopore sequencing of cell-free DNA for non-invasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies and sex chromosome aberrations.

N/A This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Performance of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies and copy number variations: A prospective study from a single center in Jiangxi province, China.

To evaluate the performance of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (expanded noninvasive prenatal testing, NIPT-Plus) in screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities includes aneuploidies and copy number variations, a total of 23,116 pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy were recruited for NIPT-Plus. Screening positive results were verified by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis after amniocentesis. A total of 264 pregnancies (1.14%) were positive results as predicted by NIPT-Plus, including 233 aneuploidies and 31 copy number variations. Following genetic counseling, 233 (88.26%) pregnant women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and 136 were verified as true positives, comprising 72 common trisomies (T21, T18, T13), 47 sex chromosomal abnormalities two rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and 15 copy number variations The positive predictive value for common trisomies, SCAs, RATs and CNVs were 68.57%, 68.12%, 6.67% and 51.72%, respectively. Pregnant women with screen-positive results for common trisomies have higher rates of invasive prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination than those with positive results for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs. NIPT-Plus showed a good performance in detecting common trisomies, SCAs and also contributed to detecting pathogenic CNVs, but higher accuracy was required in the detection of RATs. In summary, this study provides a reference for the clinical application of NIPT-Plus for screening fetal chromosomal abnormalities in this region. Therefore, we suggest that NIPT-Plus could be widely used in clinical screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in combination with prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Diseases and Associations with Serum Biomarkers of Aneuploidy: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

PurposeWe assessed prenatal detection rates of congenital heart disease (CHD) and associations between maternal serum biomarkers and non-chromosomal CHD in singleton pregnancies.Materials and MethodsThis study was conducted as a secondary analysis of data obtained during a multicenter prospective cohort study that investigated the cost-effectiveness of prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. We analyzed the prenatal detection rate and accuracy for CHD screening via ultrasound during the second trimester, as well as associations between serum biomarkers and CHDs, in singleton newborns without chromosomal abnormalities.ResultsAmong 6715 women, 142 (2.1%) newborns were born with CHDs, of which 67 (1.0%) newborns had major CHDs. The prenatal detection rate for all CHDs and major CHDs were 34.5% and 58.2%, respectively. After excluding isolated ventricular septal defects, the detection rate for critical CHDs was 85.9%. Women with low pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) (<0.4 multiples of the median, MOM) face increased risks of non-chromosomal CHDs [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36–5.13] and major CHDs (aOR 7.30; 95% CI 3.18–15.59), compared to those without CHDs. A higher inhibin A level (≥2.5 MOM; aOR 4.84; 95% CI 1.42–12.46) was associated with non-chromosomal major CHDs.ConclusionUltrasonography performed during the second trimester by obstetricians detected over 85% of critical CHDs. Low maternal serum PAPP-A or high inhibin-A was associated with non-chromosomal CHDs. These results may contribute to an improvement in prenatal diagnosis of CHDs.

Virtual-Partition Digital PCR for High-Precision Chromosomal Counting Applications.

Digital PCR (dPCR) is the gold-standard analytical platform for rapid high-precision quantification of genomic fragments. However, current dPCR assays are generally limited to monitoring 1-2 analytes per sample, thereby limiting the platform's ability to address some clinical applications that require the simultaneous monitoring of 20-50 analytes per sample. Here, we present virtual-partition dPCR (VPdPCR), a novel analysis methodology enabling the detection of 10 or more target regions per color channel using conventional dPCR hardware and workflow. Furthermore, VPdPCR enables dPCR instruments to overcome upper quantitation limits caused by partitioning error. While traditional dPCR analysis establishes a single threshold to separate negative and positive partitions, VPdPCR establishes multiple thresholds to identify the number of unique targets present in each positive droplet based on fluorescence intensity. Each physical partition is then divided into a series of virtual partitions, and the resulting increase in partition count substantially decreases partitioning error. We present both a theoretical analysis of the advantages of VPdPCR and an experimental demonstration in the form of a 20-plex assay for noninvasive fetal aneuploidy testing. This demonstration assay─tested on 432 samples contrived from sheared cell-line DNA at multiple input concentrations and simulated fractions of euploid or trisomy-21 "fetal" DNA─is analyzed using both traditional dPCR thresholding and VPdPCR. VPdPCR analysis significantly lowers the variance of the chromosomal ratio across replicates and increases the accuracy of trisomy identification when compared to traditional dPCR, yielding > 98% single-well sensitivity and specificity. VPdPCR has substantial promise for increasing the utility of dPCR in applications requiring ultrahigh-precision quantitation.

Prenatal Testing – What Is It Good For? A Review and Critique

The goals of prenatal testing remain controversial and reflect competing interests of public health, patient rights, disability activists, scholars, feminist critics, commercial laboratories, judiciary/legislative trends, and medical science. This paper reviews and critiques the most common justifications of prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy that have been put forth over the half century of its existence: reducing the medical and economic burden to society of genetic disease through selective abortion, allowing parents to avoid raising a child with disabilities, preventing the suffering associated with chromosomal and genetic disorders, emotional reassurance about the health of the baby, and medical and emotional preparation for the birth of a baby with a disability. Each of these goals has problematic aspects, as do some of the criticisms of these goals. The most striking shortcoming of the justifications for prenatal testing is a dearth of research about potential medical, psychological, or adaptational benefits of prenatal testing, especially for aneuploidy, for babies and families, beyond the option of pregnancy termination.

Expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy and copy number variations and parental willingness for invasive diagnosis in a cohort of 18,516 cases

BackgroundNoninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been wildly used to screen for common aneuplodies. In recent years, the test has been expanded to detect rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and copy number variations (CNVs). This study was performed to investigate the performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (expanded NIPT) in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs), and copy number variations (CNVs) and parental willingness for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese prenatal diagnosis center.MethodsA total of 24,702 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed at the Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2013 to April 2019, among which expanded NIPT had been successfully conducted in 24,702 pregnant women. The high-risk expanded NIPT results were validated by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis. All the tested pregnant women were followed up for pregnancy outcomes.ResultsOf the 24,702 cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 98.77% (401/446) of cases with common trisomies and SCAs, 91.95% (80/87) of RAT and CNV cases, and 76.25% (18,429/24,169) of cases with low-risk screening results. The sensitivity of expanded NIPT was 100% (95% confidence interval[CI], 97.38–100%), 96.67%(95%CI, 82.78–99.92%), and 100%(95%CI, 66.37–100.00%), and the specificity was 99.92%(95%CI, 99.87–99.96%), 99.96%(95%CI, 99.91–99.98%), and 99.88% (95%CI, 99.82–99.93%) for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Expanded NIPT detected 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, XYY syndrome, RATs, and CNVs with positive predictive values of 25.49%, 75%, 94.12%, 76.19%, 6.45%, and 50%, respectively. The women carrying fetuses with Trisomy 21/Trisomy 18/Trisomy 13 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminated their pregnancies at higher rates than those at high risk for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the expanded NIPT detects fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of detecting SCAs, RATs, and CNVs is still relatively poor and needs to be improved. With a high-risk expanded NIPT result, the women at high risk for common trisomies are more likely to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures and terminate their pregnancies than those with unusual chromosome abnormalities.

VP29.11: High‐positive predictive values across maternal ages in non‐invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy

VP29.11: High‐positive predictive values across maternal ages in non‐invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy

Implementing Publicly Funded Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy in Ontario, Canada: Clinician Experiences With a Disruptive Technology.

The last decade has experienced unprecedented uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), creating significant changes in the way prenatal clinicians provide services. Through the lens of social shaping of technology, we examine the effects of the introduction of this technology on the health care system in Ontario, Canada. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted a cross-sectional study investigating clinicians' perspectives of NIPT in 2014, 2016, and 2018. Through in-depth interviews (n = 37), we explored their perspectives on the impact of NIPT on their referral practices, workload, coordination of testing modalities, education and counseling, and elicited their views on recent expansions of the test. Findings suggest that the introduction of NIPT has created unintended consequences with respect to clinician workload and wellness, clinician education, equity of access, and public system resources. Responsiveness from decision makers is key to ensuring the responsible use of NIPT in the health care system.

Clinical Performance of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Testing for Fetal Aneuploidies and Subchromosomal Deletions/Duplications in a Cohort of 19,531 Pregnancies

Objective: We aim to assess the clinical performance of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing for detecting common fetal aneuploidies as well as subchromosomal deletions/duplications and explore the pregnancy decisions in screen-positive cases. Methods: A cohort of 19,531 pregnant women was offered cffDNA testing for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, and T13); sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs); and subchromosomal deletions/duplications. Screen-positive cases were confirmed by karyotyping and single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Results: A total of 47 cases failed the test. The overall screen-positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 1.07% (208/19,484), including 57 cases with T21, 18 cases with T18, 7 cases with T13, 106 cases with SCAs, and 20 cases of subchromosomal deletions/duplications. Positive predictive values were 91.30% (42/46), 38.46% (5/13), 33.33% (2/6), 41.33% (31/75), and 27.78% (5/18), respectively. There was no significant difference in the screening of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group (P > 0.05). All of the pregnant women who had confirmed fetal T21, T18, or T13 terminated their pregnancies, except for a case of T13 mosaic, whereas 45.16% (14/31) of women with fetal SCAs continued their pregnancies. Furthermore, 17 pregnant women with positive screens for T21, T18, or T13 without a subsequent diagnosis chose to terminate their pregnancy, whereas 29 of 31 women with SCAs chose to continue their pregnancies. Conclusions: CffDNA testing exhibited good screening accuracy for T21, T18, and T13 and also contributed to detecting fetal SCAs and subchromosomal deletions/duplications. Pregnant women with fetal 47, XXX or 47, XYY were more willing to terminate their pregnancy than those with fetal 45, X or 47, XXY.

Prevalence of Partial Hydatidiform Mole in Products of Conception From Gestations With Fetal Triploidy Merits Reflex Genotype Testing Independent of the Morphologic Appearance of the Chorionic Villi.

Diagnosis of first-trimester partial mole is challenging as the key morphologic features may not be well-developed and may overlap with those of a nonmolar gestation harboring a cytogenetic disorder or degenerative changes. Genotype testing has emerged as the reference tool to distinguish partial mole (diandric triploid genotype) from its nonmolar mimics. However, observer variation in defining the minimum threshold of how much morphologic alteration is required to trigger genotype testing may result in a subset of partial moles that go undetected. We hypothesized that the results of fetal aneuploidy testing performed for prenatal screening or evaluation of miscarriage may assist with triggering molecular testing in the evaluation of products of conception, specifically if fetal triploidy is detected. Gestations with fetal triploidy are either a partial mole (diandric triploidy) or are nonmolar (digynic triploidy). The aims of this study were to define the prevalence of partial mole in 20 products of conception specimens with known fetal triploidy by performing genotype testing and then to determine how well established morphologic criteria for partial mole correlate with the genotype results in this setting. Genotype testing demonstrated that 65% (13/20) were a partial mole and the remainder were nonmolar digynic triploid gestations. Most partial moles were under 9 weeks gestational age and, as expected, lacked classic well-developed morphologic features. Nearly a third (4/13) of the partial moles were originally interpreted as normal or nonmolar gestations with minimal abnormalities that did not merit molecular testing to exclude a partial mole. Even with the retrospective systematic morphologic review, only 23% (3/13) exhibited the combination of chorionic villous enlargement of ≥2.5 mm and cisterns, which has been previously established as the morphologic criteria with the highest predictive value for a molecularly defined partial mole. The other 77% exhibited focal, limited, variable degrees and extent of villous morphologic alterations. We conclude that, given the high prevalence of partial mole among products of conception with known fetal triploidy and the low prevalence of diagnostic morphologic findings in such specimens, reflex genotype testing should be performed in all such cases, regardless of whether or not the morphologic features are suspicious for a partial mole. This reflex testing strategy mitigates against the subjectivity of determining whether subtle villous abnormalities are significant enough to merit pursuing genotype testing. The success of this strategy depends on the clinician documenting the fetal triploidy result at the time of submitting the products of conception specimen and therefore clinician education is needed. Finally, it remains to be determined whether the risk for postmolar gestational trophoblastic disease is the same in diandric triploid gestations that exhibit classic morphologic features as in those that exhibit minimal or negligible villous morphologic abnormalities.

Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals\u2019 views from Lebanon and Quebec

BackgroundThe clinical introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies is currently transforming the landscape of prenatal screening in many countries. Since it is noninvasive, safe and allows the early detection of abnormalities, NIPT expanded rapidly and the test is currently commercially available in most of the world. As NIPT is being introduced globally, its clinical implementation should consider various challenges, including the role of the surrounding social and cultural contexts. We conducted a qualitative study with healthcare professionals in Lebanon and Quebec as case studies, to highlight the relevance of cultural contexts and to explore the concerns that should be taken into account for an ethical implementation of NIPT.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals (HCPs), 10 from each country, practicing in the field of prenatal screening and follow up diagnostic testing, including obstetricians and gynecologists, nurses, medical geneticists and, genetic counselors. We aimed to 1) explore HCPs’ perceptions and views regarding issues raised by NIPT and 2) to shed light on ways in which the introduction of the same technology (NIPT) in two different contexts (Lebanon and Quebec) raises common and different challenges that are influenced by the cultural norms and legal policies in place.ResultsWe identified challenges to the ethical implementation of NIPT. Some are common to both contexts, including financial/economic, social, and organizational/ educational challenges. Others are specific to each context. For example, challenges for Lebanon include abortion policy and financial profit, and in Quebec challenges include lobbying by Disability rights associations and geographical access to NIPT.ConclusionsOur findings highlight the need to consider specific issues related to various cultural contexts when developing frameworks that can guide an ethically sound implementation of NIPT. Further, they show that healthcare professional education and training remain paramount in order to provide NIPT counseling in a way that supports pregnant women and couples’ choice.

Combining the use of a fetal fraction-based risk algorithm and probability of an informative redraw in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.

Some women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) do not receive an informative result due to low fetal fraction (FF). A proportion of these are at increased risk for fetal trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy, while others have no change from their prior risk. Women with an initial uninformative NIPT need to be counseled about any such change in their risk for fetal abnormality and also the probability that a redraw will be informative. To help in the decision making, we reviewed a dataset of single nucleotide polymorphism‐based NIPT with uninformative results where a redraw was received. Risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy was evaluated using a fetal fraction‐based risk (FFBR) algorithm. Risk‐unchanged women were further analyzed using a regression model to determine the likelihood of an informative redraw. Of 2,644 women with an uninformative NIPT and a redraw, 1,147 (43.4%) were high risk for trisomy 13, 18, or triploidy. 1,497 (56.6%) were risk unchanged and, of these, 975 (65.1%) cases had an informative redraw (i.e., risks were available for 2,122 (80%) of those initially classified as uninformative). The regression model for the risk‐unchanged cases provided a new table for predicting an informative redraw. Likelihood of a successful redraw was significantly (p < .001) dependent on the initial FF, maternal weight, and time between blood draws. We conclude that the FFBR algorithm and the predictive model for an informative redraw provide complementary additions in the management of women presented with an initially uninformative SNP‐based NIPT due to low FF. We suggest approaches for the counseling and follow‐up testing for women with an initially uninformative NIPT.

High risk-What's next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret, and satisfaction among high-risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy.

To investigate decision making among pregnant women when choosing between noninvasive prenatal testing, invasive testing, or no further testing. Women with a high-risk result from the first trimester screening were invited to fill in two online questionnaires at gestational age 12 to 14 (Q1) and 24 weeks (Q2). The scales used were Decisional Conflict and Regret Scales, Satisfaction with genetic Counselling Scale, and Health-Relevant Personality Inventory. Three hundred thirty-nine women agreed to participate, and the response rates were 76% on Q1 and 88% on Q2. A percentage of 75.4% chose an invasive test, 23.8% chose noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), 0.4% chose no further testing, and 0.4% had both NIPT and invasive testing. Among all participants, 13.3% had a high level of decisional conflict. We found that choosing NIPT was associated with a high decisional conflict (p = 0.013), receiving genetic counselling the same day was associated with a high decisional conflict (p = 0.039), and a high satisfaction with the genetic counselling was associated with low decisional conflict (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the personality subtrait "alexithymia" was associated with low decisional conflict (p = 0.043). There was a significant association between high decisional conflict and later decisional regret (p = 0.008). We present evidence that satisfaction with and timing of counselling are important factors to limit decisional conflict. Interestingly, women choosing NIPT had more decisional conflict than women choosing invasive testing.

Sequencing shorter cfDNA fragments improves the fetal DNA fraction in noninvasive prenatal testing

Sequencing cell-free DNA in maternal plasma is an effective noninvasive prenatal testing technique that has been used in fetal aneuploidy screening worldwide. However, its clinical application is limited by the low fetal fraction (<4%) of cell-free DNA in many singleton pregnancies, which usually results in screen failures or no calls. In addition, dizygotic twin contributions of cell-free DNA into the maternal circulation can vary by 2-fold, complicating the quantitative diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy. We performed semiconductor sequencing of shorter fragments (107-145 bp) of circulating cell-free DNA to improve the fetal DNA fraction at lower uniquely mapped reads (1-8.5 MB) to reduce the probability of no calls. We identified 2903 plasma samples from pregnant women, including 86 dizygotic twin pregnancy, that were collected at a single prenatal diagnostic center between October 2015 and July 2018. Size-selection noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy was applied to 2817 plasma samples (1409 male and 1408 female fetuses) and 86 dizygotic twins using noninvasive prenatal testing with and without size selection. Shorter fragment size was the key factor affecting fetal fraction in multivariable linear regression models as well as to validate the accuracy of the size selection for noninvasive prenatal testing. Analysis of 1409 male fetuses by multivariable linear regression showed that maternal age, body mass index, number of pregnancies, average cell-free DNA size, maternal plasma cell-free DNA concentration, library concentration, and multiple gestation were negatively correlated with fetal fraction. Conversely, gestational age and uniquely mapped reads were positively correlated with fetal fraction. Compared with ≤120 bp cell-free DNA fragments, mean fetal fraction differences were -3.57% (95% confidence interval, -5.95% to -1.19%), for 121-130 bp, -9.52% (95% confidence interval, -11.89% to -7.14%) for 131-140 bp, and -14.47% (95% confidence interval, -18.37% to -10.58%) for ≥141 bp (Ptrend < .0001). These results were statistically significant after multivariable adjustments in models for fetal fraction. Meanwhile, results from 86 dizygotic twins showed that the size selection increased the fetal fraction by ∼3.2-fold, with 98.8% of samples reaching a fetal fraction >10%. Improved detection accuracy was also achieved. Sequencing shorter cell-free DNA fragments is a reasonable strategy to reduce the probability of no calls results because of low fetal fraction and should be recommended to pregnant subjects.

Validation of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidies and Microdeletions Down to 2% Fetal Fraction [20O

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by massively parallel sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma detects fetal aneuploidies with high sensitivity and specificity. However, accurate detection of fetal aneuploidies in samples with low fetal fraction remains challenging. METHODS: We have developed an NIPT pipeline that utilizes a statistical model-based counting algorithm to (1) calculate the representation of genomic regions of interest; (2) estimate the fetal fraction; (3) assess the fetal sex by Y chromosome representation; (4) determine the risk of fetal aneuploidies and microdeletions. The training set was modeled using 2,813 euploid samples (1,673 male and 1,140 female fetuses). For intermediate result calls, assessment incorporated likelihood ratios. Sensitivities and specificities were dynamically calculated in relation to both sequencing read depth and fetal fraction to set reporting thresholds. RESULTS: This clinical pipeline tested with 2,253 samples including 98 known positive samples for aneuploidies of chromosomes 21, 18, 13, 16, 22, 15, X and Y as well as microdeletions of subchromosomal regions (22q11.2, 1p36, 15q11.2-q13, 4p16, 5p15, 11q23, and 8q24). Results were called with both sensitivity and specificity &gt;99% for common aneuploidies. The observed normalized chromosome values closely fit the statistical model's estimation, indicating accurate aneuploidy calls down to 2% fetal fraction. CONCLUSION: In this study, we present a validation model for an NIPT pipeline utilizing a statistical model-based counting algorithm that can accurately detect the fetal aneuploidies and microdeletions down to low fetal fraction.

Noninvasive screening by cell-free DNA for 22q11.2 deletion: Benefits, limitations, and challenges.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing for fetal aneuploidy is one of the most important technical advances in prenatal care. Additional chromosome targets beyond common aneuploidies, including the 22q11.2 microdeletion, are now available because of this clinical testing technology. While there are numerous potential benefits, 22q11.2 microdeletion screening using cfDNA testing also presents significant limitations and pitfalls. Practitioners who are offering this test should provide comprehensive pretest and posttest prenatal counselling. The discussion should include the possibility of an absence of a result, as well as the risk of possible discordance between cfDNA screening results and the actual fetal genetic chromosomal constitution. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the cfDNA testing technologies for 22q11.2 microdeletions screening, describe the current state of test validation and clinical experience, review "no results" and discordant findings based on differing technologies, and discuss management options.

In pregnant women with a positive BUN screen or quad screen, does secondary screening with cell-free DNA reduce the incidence of invasive testing for fetal aneuploidy?

In pregnant women with a positive BUN screen or quad screen, does secondary screening with cell-free DNA reduce the incidence of invasive testing for fetal aneuploidy?