Test Of Functional Health Literacy In Adults Scores Research Articles

Change in Health Literacy over a Decade in a Prospective Cohort of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Health literacy is often viewed as a static trait in longitudinal studies, which may over or underestimate an individual's ability to manage one's health. We sought to examine health literacy over time among older adults using three widely used measures. A prospective cohort study. Community-dwelling adults ages 55 to 74 at baseline with at least one follow-up visit (N = 656) recruited from one academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers in Chicago, IL. Health literacy was measured using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Newest Vital Sign (NVS), and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) at baseline and up to three follow-up time points. In unadjusted analyses, significant changes since baseline were found beginning at the second follow-up (mean (M) = 6.0 years, SD = 0.6) for the TOFHLA (M = - 0.9, SD = 0.95, p = 0.049) and the REALM (M = 0.3, SD = 2.5, p = 0.004) and at the last follow-up (M = 8.6 years, SD = 0.5) for the NVS (M = - 0.2, SD = 1.4, p = 0.02). There were non-linear effects of baseline age on TOFHLA and NVS scores over time (piecewise cubic spline p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) and no effect on REALM scores (B = 0.02, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.04, p = 0.17) using multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models, controlling for race, education, income, and comorbidity. We found a negative relationship between age and health literacy over time as measured by the TOFHLA and NVS. Health literacy barriers appear to be more prevalent among individuals in later life, when self-care demands are similarly increasing. Clinicians might consider strategies to assess and respond to limited health literacy, particularly among patients 70 and older. REALM performance remained stable over 10 years of follow-up. This questions whether health literacy tools measure the same attribute. Prospective health literacy studies should carefully consider what measures to use, depending on their objective.

Validation of a Short Form for Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology.

Background:Health literacy is an area of growing research and clinical interest, necessitating short, accurate measures of this complex construct. Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology (Health LiTT) measures prose, document, and quantitative literacy by self-administration on a touchscreen computer.Objective:The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a short form of Health LiTT and to identify a meaningful cutoff score for adequate health literacy.Methods:A subsample of 137 participants from the Literacy and Cognitive Function among Older Adults study completed a 10-item Health LiTT short form and three interviewer-administered health literacy measures: Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), and Newest Vital Sign (NVS). Convergent validity was assessed by correlating scores for all measures, and known-groups validity was assessed by comparing mean Health LITT scores across TOFHLA levels (inadequate, marginal, adequate). Internal consistency reliability was estimated with Cronbach's alpha. A cutoff score for adequate health literacy was established using the TOFHLA cutoff for adequate versus inadequate/marginal health literacy.Key Results:Spearman correlations between Health LiTT scores and total TOFHLA, REALM, and NVS scores were 0.65, 0.69, and 0.56, respectively (all p < .001). Mean Health LiTT scores were significantly and meaningfully different across inadequate (40.4), marginal (50.1), and adequate (57.1) TOFHLA categories (F = 60.6; p < .001). Cronbach's alpha for the Health LiTT short form was .73. A cutoff score of 55 on Health LiTT showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity to identify adequate health literacy.Conclusions:This 10-item Health LiTT short form demonstrated excellent convergent and known-groups validity and acceptable internal consistency reliability in older adults. The established cutoff also showed excellent sensitivity and specificity. Validation of other custom Health LiTT short forms with varying items from the bank and computer adaptive test-generated Health LiTT scores is ongoing. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2020;4(4):e200–e207.]Plain Language Summary:This article provides evidence of the need for and psychometric properties of a valid and reliable short form of the flexible, technologically advanced Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology measure, as well as a cutoff score to note adequate versus marginal/inadequate health literacy.

The Roles of Health Literacy and Physician-Patient Relationship in Self-Reported Health Outcomes Within a Diverse Sample of Persons Living with HIV

Abstract Objective Barriers like poor health literacy and patient-provider communication add to health disparities in diverse populations. Perceived autonomy has been shown to improve patients’ health satisfaction and knowledge of their illness. However, no studies have examined these issues in HIV patients. This study examined the roles of health literacy and physician-patient relationship in health outcomes (e.g., mental health and emotional/physical functioning) in persons living with HIV (PLWH). Participants and Method This cross-sectional study included 91 PLWH (74% Latinx and 26% non-Latinx White; 68% Male) who completed the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Physician–Patient Relationship Scale (PPRS), and Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey (MOS). The study variables included: TOFHLA total score, PPRS Part Decision- Making (PDM) and Trust subscales, and MOS Mental Health and Health Transition subscales. Results A linear regression showed that our model (ethnicity, TOFHLA, PPRS PDM and Trust) predicted MOS HT (R2 = .14, p &amp;lt; 0.05), such that Latinx ethnicity (β = .30) and better TOFHLA scores (β = -.22) predicted better MOS HT scores (ps &amp;lt; .05). Another regression showed that our model predicted MOS MH (R2 = 0.07, p = &amp;lt;.01), such that greater PPRS PDM scores predicted better MOS MH scores (β = .27, p = &amp;lt;.01). Conclusions Ethnicity and better health literacy were related to improved emotional/physical functioning over a 4-week period and greater shared decision-making was related to better overall mental health. These findings highlight the importance of identifying sociocultural factors and interpersonal processes of care to inform culturally-tailored interventions that can result in enhanced and effective treatment for PLWH patients and in improved physical and mental health outcomes.

Health Literacy in Older Adults With and Without Low Vision.

In this study, we investigated whether older adults with low vision (LV) from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) demonstrated lower functional health literacy than older adults without LV. Fifty adults with AMD were matched with adults without LV on age, gender, education, and income. We measured visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and reading speed and administered the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) using two test time conditions, standard and unlimited, to measure health literacy levels. The group with LV had considerably lower TOFHLA scores for both time conditions (p < .001) and took notably longer to complete the test (p < .001). Poorer acuity correlated with lower TOFHLA scores in the group with LV. Older adults with LV may take longer to read and understand health information, which has important implications for providing health education to support self-management. Modifying components of the reading task may facilitate reading performance and understanding of health education materials.

The role of cognitive function in the relationship between age and health literacy: a cross-sectional analysis of older adults in Chicago, USA

ObjectivesTo investigate how 3 measures of health literacy correlate with age and the explanatory roles of fluid and crystallised cognitive abilities in these relationships among older adults.DesignCross-sectional baseline analysis of...

How well do patients understand written instructions?: health literacy assessment in rural and urban rheumatology outpatients.

The aim of this study was to assess health literacy (word recognition and comprehension) in patients at a rural rheumatology practice and to compare this to health literacy levels in patients from an urban rheumatology practice.Inclusion criteria for this cross-sectional study were as follows: ≥18-year-old patients at a rural rheumatology practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic, Coffs Harbour, Australia) and an urban Sydney rheumatology practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice, Kogarah, Australia). Exclusion criteria were as follows: ill-health precluding participation; poor vision/hearing, non-English primary language. Word recognition was assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). Comprehension was assessed using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Practical comprehension and numeracy were assessed by asking patients to follow prescribing instructions for 5 common rheumatology medications.At the rural practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic), 124/160 patients agreed to participate (F:M 83:41, mean age 60.3 ± 12.2) whereas the corresponding number at the urban practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice) was 99/119 (F:M 69:30, mean age 60.7 ± 17.5). Urban patients were more likely to be born overseas, speak another language at home, and be employed. There was no difference in REALM or TOFHLA scores between the 2 sites, and so data were pooled. REALM scores indicated 15% (33/223) of patients had a reading level ≤Grade 8 whereas 8% (18/223) had marginal or inadequate functional health literacy as assessed by the TOFHLA. Dosing instructions for ibuprofen and methotrexate were incorrectly understood by 32% (72/223) and 21% (46/223) of patients, respectively.Up to 15% of rural and urban patients had low health literacy and <1/3 of patients incorrectly followed dosing instructions for common rheumatology drugs.There was no significant difference in word recognition, functional health literacy, and numeracy between rural and urban rheumatology patients.

A multisite community-based health literacy intervention for Spanish speakers.

The National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy emphasizes the importance of community-based opportunities for education, such as English as a second language (ESL) programs. It recommends collaborations among the adult literacy and ESL communities. However, limited attention has been given to researching the effectiveness of community-based interventions that combine ESL and health literacy. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of using different community settings for improving health literacy among adult Spanish speakers through an English language program. The study used a pre-experimental, single arm pretest-posttest design, and implemented the Health Literacy and ESL Curriculum. A collaborative was established between the community and university researchers. Participants were recruited at three distinctive sites. Health literacy was assessed using the Spanish version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Analysis included descriptive and paired-group t test. Forty-nine participants completed the intervention and post-tests (92% retention rate). Overall--all sites--posttest scores significantly improved for total TOFHLA, raw numeracy, and reading comprehension (p < 0.0001). Similarly, all three sites yielded significantly better mean differences for the total TOFHLA score while numeracy and reading comprehension significantly improved in some sites. Results suggest that community sites are viable venues for delivering health literacy/language instruction to Spanish speaking adults. The study also points to community engagement and ESL programs as two essential components of effective health literacy interventions among Spanish speakers.

Socio-economic correlates of functional health literacy among patients of primary health care in Kosovo

ObjectivesFunctional health literacy (FHL) has been related to individual characteristics, ill-health and disease knowledge. However, the information about FHL in Kosovo is very limited and thus the aim of this study was to assess the demographic and socio-economic correlates of FHL among users of primary health care in Kosovo, a postconflict country in the Western Balkans. Study designCross-sectional study. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Kosovo between November 2012–February 2013, including a representative sample of 1035 consecutive primary care users aged ≥18 years (60% females; overall mean age: 44.3 ± 16.9 years; overall response rate: 86%). Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) was used to assess FHL. General linear model and logistic regression were used to assess the association of TOFHLA score with demographic and socio-economic characteristics. ResultsOverall, four out of five participants exhibited inadequate or marginal FHL in this Kosovo sample. FHL score was independently and inversely related to age, but positively associated with educational attainment and being in a situation other than unemployed. ConclusionsLimited or marginal FHL was very common among primary care users in Kosovo and considerably higher than in the neighbouring Serbia. The low health literacy levels in Kosovo may provide an additional barrier towards achievement of health care goals. There is a need to design and implement suitable and effective educational and health system interventions in the Kosovo context.

Efficiently Assessing Patient Health Literacy

Although health literacy limitations are common among patient populations, no efficient yet comprehensive health literacy assessment tool is available to nurses for use in busy health care settings. This study presents beginning evidence for the validity and reliability of a new health literacy assessment tool, the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS). One hundred patients attending four primary care clinics completed the BHLS and the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) short form and answered questions about the health literacy tools. Findings indicated significant correlations between BHLS and shortened version of the TOFHLA (S-TOFHLA) scores, with higher correlations between BHLS items addressing written health literacy and the S-TOFHLA. Comparative discrimination findings were significant at BHLS cut point of 18 and S-TOFHLA cut point less than 23. Patients rated the BHLS significantly less difficult to complete than the S-TOFHLA. Results of preliminary testing indicate the BHLS is a potentially efficient, effective, and patient-friendly screening tool for health literacy.

Relationships among Functional Health Literacy, Asthma Knowledge and the Ability to Care for Asthmatic Children in Rural Dwelling Parents

Purpose: This Orem-based study examined the relationships among functional health literacy, asthma knowledge, the ability to care for asthmatic children and sociodemographic factors among rural parent/guardians. Method: A descriptive correlation design was used. The convenience sample of 57 parents and one guardian who cared for asthmatic children was recruited from three rural health districts in the eastern United States (Virginia, North Carolina, and upstate New York). Subjects completed the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) and the Asthma Questionnaire-Parent Survey (AQ-P) and provided additional demographic and health status information. Findings: The results show that TOFHLA scores were directly related to asthma knowledge (AQ-P scores), p=.04. Subjects who had not completed high school had significantly lower TOFHLA scores than those who had completed high school, and their children were hospitalized more often (p=.05). Those with higher income also had higher health literacy (TOFHLA scores) (p=.008) and regression analysis revealed that smoking status was also directly associated with functional health literacy (p=.004). Conclusions: The findings confirm that rural health care providers need to be diligent in assuring that health education materials and verbal instructions are presented in the most simple and easy to read format in order to maximize understanding. Keywords: Health Literacy, Asthma Knowledge, Orem’s Theory of Dependent Care Agency

The influence of task environment and health literacy on the quality of parent-reported ADHD data

To determine 1) the extent to which paper-based and computer-based environments influence the sufficiency of parents' report of child behaviors and the accuracy of data on current medications, and 2) the impact of parents' health literacy on the quality of information produced. We completed a randomized controlled trial of data entry tasks with parents of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Parents completed the NICHQ Vanderbilt ADHD screen and a report of current ADHD medications on paper or using a computer application designed to facilitate data entry. Literacy was assessed by the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Primary outcomes included sufficient data to screen for ADHD subtypes and accurate report of total daily dose of prescribed ADHD medications. Of 271 parents screened, 194/271 were eligible and 182 were randomized. Data from 180 parents were analyzed. 5.6% parents had inadequate/marginal TOFHLA scores. Using the computer, parents provided more sufficient and accurate data compared to paper (sufficiency for ADHD screening, paper vs. computer: 87.8% vs. 93.3%, P = 0.20; accuracy of medication report: 14.3% vs. 69.4%; p<0.0001). Parents with adequate literacy had increased odds of reporting sufficient and accurate data (sufficiency for ADHD screening: OR 8.0, 95% CI 2.0-32.1; accuracy of medication report: OR 4.4, 95% CI 0.5-37.4). In adjusted models, the computer task environment remained a significant predictor of accurate medication report (OR 18.7, 95% CI 7.5-46.9). Structured, computer-based data entry by parents may improve the quality of specific types of information needed for ADHD care. Health literacy affects parents' ability to share valid information.

Health Literacy and Task Environment Influence Parents' Burden for Data Entry on Child-Specific Health Information: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Health care systems increasingly rely on patients’ data entry efforts to organize and assist in care delivery through health information exchange. Objectives We sought to determine (1) the variation in burden imposed on parents by data entry efforts across paper-based and computer-based environments, and (2) the impact, if any, of parents’ health literacy on the task burden.Methods We completed a randomized controlled trial of parent-completed data entry tasks. Parents of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were randomized based on the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) to either a paper-based or computer-based environment for entry of health information on their children. The primary outcome was the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (TLX) total weighted score.Results We screened 271 parents: 194 (71.6%) were eligible, and 180 of these (92.8%) constituted the study cohort. We analyzed 90 participants from each arm. Parents who completed information tasks on paper reported a higher task burden than those who worked in the computer environment: mean (SD) TLX scores were 22.8 (20.6) for paper and 16.3 (16.1) for computer. Assignment to the paper environment conferred a significant risk of higher task burden (F1,178 = 4.05, P = .046). Adequate literacy was associated with lower task burden (decrease in burden score of 1.15 SD, P = .003). After adjusting for relevant child and parent factors, parents’ TOFHLA score (beta = -.02, P = .02) and task environment (beta = .31, P = .03) remained significantly associated with task burden.Conclusions A tailored computer-based environment provided an improved task experience for data entry compared to the same tasks completed on paper. Health literacy was inversely related to task burden. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00543257; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00543257 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5vUVH2DYR)

Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults

To develop and validate an instrument to measure the functional oral health literacy of adults. For the generation of items different dental patient educational materials and text types were selected that had reading levels similar to materials used for the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) which was the model for our Oral Health Literacy Instrument (OHLI). The OHLI contains reading comprehension and numeracy sections. The reading comprehension section is a 38-item test with words omitted from one passage on dental caries and another on periodontal disease. The numeracy section has 19 items to test comprehension of directions for taking common prescriptions associated with dental treatment, postextraction instructions and dental appointments. We also developed a 17-item oral health knowledge test. The OHLI, the TOFHLA, the oral health knowledge test and a brief questionnaire were administered to a convenience sample of 100 patients. Internal reliability of OHLI was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was examined by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Concurrent validity was tested by comparing OHLI scores across categories of education level and frequency of dental visits. Construct validity was assessed by correlating OHLI scores with TOFHLA scores and with the oral health knowledge scores using Spearman's rho (rho) and multiple linear regression. Participants averaged 39 years (SD = 12.4); 73% were female; 64% had college/university education; 40% visited a dentist every 3-6 months. Total OHLI and TOFHLA weighted mean scores were 87.2 and 91.7, respectively (possible range 0-100). The Cronbach's alpha values were high (>0.7) for OHLI and its components. The ICC values indicated good agreement between the test and retest results for OHLI and the oral health knowledge test. Patients visiting a dentist every 3-6 months had significantly higher levels of oral health literacy than those visiting only when they felt pain. The association between OHLI and education level was not significant. OHLI scores were significantly correlated with the scores on the TOFHLA (rho = 0.613) and the test of oral health knowledge (rho = 0.573). These associations remained significant in multiple regression models. Initial testing of OHLI suggested that it is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate oral health literacy among adults, although additional work is needed to investigate the instrument's predictive validity and sensitivity to change using oral health outcomes with population groups known to be at high risk of low functional oral health literacy.

Health Literacy among Spanish-Speaking Patients in the Emergency Department

Health literacy influences a patient's ability to read and understand labels on medicine containers, appointment slips, informed-consent documents and medical instructions--all of which are considered basic health documents that a patient encounters in healthcare settings. Previous research suggests Spanish-speaking patients have low levels of health literacy. This study compares the functional health literacy (FHL) of Spanish- and English-speaking adult patients in a suburban emergency department (ED). Through a prospective, matched cohort design, Spanish-speaking adult patients and pediatric guardians presenting to the ED were matched with English-speaking patients by age, gender and treatment area. Demographic information, including total years of school completed and self-assessed reading ability, was collected. The Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) was administered in the subject's primary language. A score of <60 indicated inadequate FHL, 60-74 marginally adequate FHL, and >74 adequate literacy. Eighty-six matched pairs were enrolled. The median age was 30.5 years, and 56% were male. Spanish speakers averaged a TOFHLA score of 59.72, and English speakers 90.78. Only 7% of English speakers had less-than-adequate FHL compared to 74% of Spanish speakers. The average years of school completed were 10.59 (7.95 Spanish; 13.19 English), and 55% of English speakers reported "excellent" reading ability compared to 13% of Spanish speakers. Last grade completed (p=0.004) and self-assessed reading ability (p=0.0007) are predictors of TOFHLA scores. Those subjects who completed less than the eighth grade had inadequate FHL. The majority of Spanish-speaking subjects have less-than-adequate FHL. Self-reported reading ability and years of school completed appear to predict FHL and may be clinically useful. Due to the disproportionately low level of health literacy among Spanish-speaking patients demonstrated in this and previous studies, future efforts should focus on developing programs that improve health literacy by providing this population with oral translations and pictorial and video instructions.

Functional Health Literacy in Patients With Glaucoma in Urban Settings

To assess the relationship between health literacy and compliance, disease awareness, and disease progression in patients with glaucoma. A cross-sectional observational study of 204 English-speaking patients treated for glaucoma for at least 1 year at Kresge Eye Institute was conducted. Health literacy was assessed using the standardized Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). An oral questionnaire assessed patients' demographic information and glaucoma understanding. A retrospective medical record review was conducted to record parameters indicating glaucoma severity. One hundred two participants (50%) were categorized as having poor functional health literacy (mean [SD] TOFHLA score, 18.4 [7.5]) and 102 participants (50%) had adequate health literacy (mean [SD] TOFHLA score, 42.8 [5.1]). The poor health literacy group showed significant differences in income, education, medication compliance, glaucoma understanding, and missed appointments compared with the adequate health literacy group (P < .001). Patients with poor health literacy showed a greater visual field loss on initial presentation (mean deviation [SD], -10.58 [9.3] dB) compared with the adequate health literacy group (mean deviation [SD], -7.79 [6.9] dB; P = .02) and significantly worse visual field parameters when comparing pattern SDs on the recent and the initial visual fields (pattern SD change [SD], 0.19 [2.5] dB in the poor health literacy group vs -0.7 [2.2] dB in the adequate health literacy group; P = .02). Patients with poor health literacy had poorer compliance, worse disease understanding, and greater disease progression compared with the adequate health literacy group, highlighting the need to promote health literacy in patients with glaucoma.

Quick Assessment of Literacy in Primary Care: The Newest Vital Sign

Current health literacy screening instruments for health care settings are either too long for routine use or available only in English. Our objective was to develop a quick and accurate screening test for limited literacy available in English and Spanish. We administered candidate items for the new instrument and also the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) to English-speaking and Spanish-speaking primary care patients. We measured internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and assessed criterion validity by measuring correlations with TOFHLA scores. Using TOFLHA scores <75 to define limited literacy, we plotted receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves and calculated likelihood ratios for cutoff scores on the new instrument. The final instrument, the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), is a nutrition label that is accompanied by 6 questions and requires 3 minutes for administration. It is reliable (Cronbach alpha >0.76 in English and 0.69 in Spanish) and correlates with the TOFHLA. Area under the ROC curve is 0.88 for English and 0.72 for Spanish versions. Patients with more than 4 correct responses are unlikely to have low literacy, whereas fewer than 4 correct answers indicate the possibility of limited literacy. NVS is suitable for use as a quick screening test for limited literacy in primary health care settings.

Health Literacy, Morbidity, and Quality of Life Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

Objectives: Health literacy has been related to indicators of health outcomes in a number of populations,but not in spinal cord injury (SCI). The current study aimed to describe levels of health literacy in SCI and to investigate its possible associations with morbidity, health-related quality of life, functional independence,community participation, and life satisfaction.Design: Cross-sectional survey of 107 community-living people with SCI recruited in a New jersey outpatient SCI center. Primary measures were the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), standard questions about morbidity from the Behavioral Risk FactorsSurveillance Study, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), Short Form-12 (SF-12), and Diener's Satisfaction with Life Scale.Results: Health literacy was marginal or inadequate (TOFHLA = 0–74) in only 14% of the sample. TOFHLA scores correlated significantly with physical health morbidity, even after control for severity of motor paralysis and education. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Motor Scores were correlated with physical morbidityand CHART Physical Independence scores; and education was related to community Mobility, Occupation, and Economic Independence, and Satisfaction with Life scores, independent of other factors. Rasch analysis identified ceiling measurement limitations in the TOFHLA.Conclusions: Health literacy levels in this sample were higher than those found in other groups. Health literacy was independently related to physical health morbidity, but its associations with other outcomes were limited, entwined with education, and affected by severity of injury. Future research might examine higher level aspects of health literacy to overcome ceiling measurement problems. Mediators of the association between health literacy and morbidity, such as health self-care behaviors, should also be examined.

Health Literacy and Pregnancy Preparedness in Pregestational Diabetes

The 19,000 women with pregestational diabetes who deliver infants each year in the United States are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, and congenital anomalies. The risk could be limited by preconceptional planning that ensures good glycemic control as well as folic acid supplementation. This pilot study was done to examine the association, if any, between low functional health literacy in women with pregestational diabetes and markers of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Seventy-four pregnant women with type 1 or type 2 pregestational diabetes were prospectively entered into the study. They completed the short form of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) as well as a demographic and medical questionnaire. Sixteen of the 74 women (22%) had low functional health literacy based on a TOFHLA score of 30 or lower. Women with adequate health literacy came earlier for prenatal care. There was no intergroup difference in gestational age at the time of evaluation. The adequate-literacy women were more often white and had had diabetes for a longer time. Fewer women in the low-literacy group had a high school education, and these women also had lower socioeconomic status. Unplanned pregnancies were more frequent in the low-literacy group, and women were less likely to have discussed becoming pregnant with a physician. In addition, low-literacy women were less likely to have taken folic acid before pregnancy or in the first trimester. Low-literacy women were likelier to be hospitalized during pregnancy, chiefly because of inadequate glycemic control. There was no group difference in gestational age at delivery, but birth weights were significantly greater in the low-literacy group. These women also were likelier to have an infant weighing more than 4000 g. In women with pregestational diabetes, low functional health literacy is associated with several factors that could negatively affect birth outcomes.

Health literacy and pregnancy preparedness in pregestational diabetes.

We investigated the association between functional health literacy and markers of pregnancy preparedness in women with pregestational diabetes. English- and Spanish-speaking pregnant women with pregestational diabetes were recruited. Women completed the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) short form and a questionnaire. A TOFHLA score of < or =30 was defined as low functional health literacy. Of 74 women participating in the study, 16 (22%) were classified as having low functional health literacy. Compared with women with adequate health literacy, those with low health literacy were significantly more likely to have an unplanned pregnancy (P = 0.02) and significantly less likely to have either discussed pregnancy ahead of time with an endocrinologist or obstetrician (P = 0.01) or taken folic acid (P = 0.001). The results of this study suggest that low functional health literacy among women with pregestational diabetes is associated with several factors that may adversely impact birth outcomes.

Comprehension of Written Health Care Information in an Affluent Geriatric Retirement Community: Use of the Test of Functional Health Literacy

Background: The comprehension of written health care information, e.g. prescription bottle labels or an informed consent form, impacts on communication with patients and their ability to understand medical procedures, as well as goals of therapy. Objective: To determine if the problem of literacy was present in a population of affluent Albuquerque retirement community dwellers. Methods: We administered the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHL) to 93 residents (71 women and 22 men), using a one-on-one directed examination conducted by one of the authors (J.G.B.). Results: The group studied had a mean age of >70 years, were not acutely ill, had no known loss of mental function, were better educated and had a high standard of living compared to national standards. However, 30% (95% confidence level) of our group were unable to adequately comprehend written information as measured by the TOFHL. The subgroup with poor comprehension (21 women and 7 men) had a mean age of 85 years (versus 82 years in the group with good comprehension) and a mean of 13 years (versus 15 years in the group with good comprehension) of formal education. Multivariate analysis was consistent with a negative effect of age (p = 0.04), a positive effect of years of formal education (p = 0.0005) and no effect of gender on the TOFHL score. Conclusion: Two recent studies, one in an emergency room setting and the other among Medicare enrollees, demonstrated similar results to ours. The high prevalence of poor comprehension in these groups should alert providers to the need to develop additional or different communication skills that can address the problem of poor reading comprehension across at least three diverse groups of people, with particular attention to those over the age of 65.