Concordance Test Research Articles

Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults

Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults

Concordance between Preoperative #ENZIANi Score and Postoperative #ENZIANs Score Classification-Why Do We Choose #ENZIAN and How Does It Impact the Future Classification Trend?

Objectives: To assess the concordance of the preoperative application of the #ENZIAN classification (#ENZIANi) with the postoperative result (#ENZIANs) using surgical findings as the reference standard. Methods: This retrospective study included 282 consecutive patients with deep endometriosis undergoing surgical treatment. Preoperative assessment with transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging was compared with postoperative assessment. Concordance and diagnostic test evaluation were calculated. Results: The highest concordance was observed in the F (abdominal wall endometriosis) with k Cohen of 0.837, following the values for pelvic locations, with 0.795 for T left, 0.791 for T right, 0.776 for F (adenomyosis), 0.766 for C (rectum), and 0.75 and 0.72 for O right k and O left, respectively. The highest sensitivity was demonstrated for the P compartment *(98%), T compartment (both sides 97%), and A, B, C (94-96%), corresponding with deep endometriosis. Conclusions: Preoperative assessment using TVS/TAS + MRI with the ENZIANi score correlates well with the ENZIANs postoperative score and demonstrates good concordance in the detection and localization of deep endometriosis, thereby minimizing false negative results and ensuring accurate preoperative staging. The ENZIAN classification is well-suited to surgeon needs and benefits from continuous development. Future improvements, such as adding the expanded C module, may be considered in the next edition.

Examining the impact of sleep deprivation on medical reasoning’s performance among anaesthesiology residents and doctors: a prospective study

BackgroundWorking long consecutive hours’ is common for anaesthesia and critical care physicians. It is associated with impaired medical reasoning’s performance of anaesthesiology and serious medical errors. However, no study has yet investigated the impact of working long consecutive hours’ on medical reasoning.ObjectiveThe present study evaluated the impact of working long consecutive hours’ on the medical reasoning’s performance of anaesthesiology and intensive care physicians (residents and seniors).MethodsThis multicentric, prospective, cross-over study was conducted in 5 public hospitals of Normandy region. Two groups of anaesthesia and critical care physicians were formed. One was in a rest group, RG (after a 48-hours weekend without hospital work) and the other in Sleep Deprivation Group (SDG) after a 24 h-consecutives-shift. Changes in medical reasoning’s performance were measured by 69-items script concordance tests (SCT) through to the two tests. Group A completed the first part of the assessment (Set A) after a weekend without work and the second part (Set B) after a 24 h-shift; group B did the same in reverse order. The primary outcome was medical reasoning’s performance as measured by SCT in RG and SDG. The secondary outcomes included association between the performance with the demographic data, variation of the KSS (Karolinska sleepiness scale) daytime alertness score, the number of 24 h-shift during the previous 30 days, the vacations during the previous 30 days, the presence of more or less than 4 h consecutives hours slept, the management of a stressful event during the shift, the different resident years, the place where the shift took place (University hospital or general hospitals) and the type of shift (anaesthesia or intensive care).Results84 physicians (26 physicians and 58 residents) were included. RG exhibited significantly higher performance scores than SDG (68 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 9, respectively; p = 0.008). We found a negative correlation between the number of 24 h-shifts performed during the previous month and the variation of medical reasoning’s performance and no significant variation between professionals who slept 4 h or less and those who slept more than 4 h consecutively during the shift (-4 ± 11 vs. -2 ± 11; p = 0.42).ConclusionOur study suggests that medical reasoning’ performance of anaesthesiologists, measured by the SCT, is reduced after 24 h-shift than after rest period. Working long consecutive hours’ and many shifts should be avoided to prevent the occurrence of medical errors.

Script Concordance Test in Physiology: Preparation, Scoring, and Student Perceptions – A Mixed Method Study

Background: Although the curriculum has changed, assessment tools are not in alignment with the new types of teaching such as early clinical exposure (ECE) and self-directed learning. Both in summative and formative assessment most commonly used tools for assessment of cognitive domain are written formats including MCQ. However, these assessment tools such as MCQ and written essays cannot assess the higher order thinking skills and clinical reasoning skills. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted in the department of physiology, in collaboration with medical simulation center, as a part of formative assessment for topics on pathophysiology of shock and obstructive and restrictive lung disorders taught during ECE using case scenarios. Two script concordance tests (SCTs) each on the topic of pathophysiological mechanism of different types of shock and obstructive and restrictive lung disorders each were prepared and administered to the students. Student perception to this assessment tools was obtained. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha of the 6-item SCT for respiratory and cardiovascular topic administered to the students (n = 107, 98) was 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. The inter-item correlation was respiratory and cardiovascular topic for 0.71, 0.69 suggesting that they are close and repetitive. Students were of the opinion that SCT are difficult to understand (75.8%), challenging to answer (47.2%), and it tested the clinical content better (71.4%). Conclusions: In our study, students felt though SCT tested the clinical content better when compared to conventionally used MCQ, they still find it challenging to understand and are not in favor of its use in summative and formative assessments.

Development and validation of a 66K SNP array for the hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria)

BackgroundThe hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria), a marine bivalve distributed along the U.S. eastern seaboard, supports a significant shellfish industry. Overharvest in the 1970s and 1980s led to a reduction in landings. While the transition of industry from wild harvest to aquaculture since that time has enhanced production, it has also exacerbated challenges such as disease outbreaks. In this study, we developed and validated a 66K SNP array designed to advance genetic studies and improve breeding programs in the hard clam, focusing particularly on the development of markers that could be useful in understanding disease resistance and environmental adaptability.ResultsWhole-genome resequencing of 84 individual clam samples and 277 pooled clam libraries yielded over 305 million SNPs, which were filtered down to a set of 370,456 SNPs that were used as input for the design of a 66K SNP array. This medium-density array features 66,543 probes targeting coding and non-coding regions, including 70 mitochondrial SNPs, to capture the extensive genetic diversity within the species. The SNPs were distributed evenly throughout the clam genome, with an average interval of 25,641 bp between SNPs. The array incorporates markers for detecting the clam pathogen Mucochytrium quahogii (formerly QPX), enhancing its utility in disease management. Performance evaluation on 1,904 samples demonstrated a 72.7% pass rate with stringent quality control. Concordance testing affirmed the array's repeatability, with an average agreement of allele calls of 99.64% across multiple tissue types, highlighting its reliability. The tissue-specific analysis demonstrated that some tissue types yield better genotyping results than others. Importantly, the array, including its embedded mitochondrial markers, effectively elucidated complex genetic relationships across different clam groups, both wild populations and aquacultured stocks, showcasing its utility for detailed population genetics studies.ConclusionsThe 66K SNP array is a powerful and robust genotyping tool that offers unprecedented insights into the species’ genomic architecture and population dynamics and that can greatly facilitate hard clam selective breeding. It represents an important resource that has the potential to transform clam aquaculture, thereby promoting industry sustainability and ecological and economic resilience.

Knowledge, confidence and clinical reasoning of dental students for diagnosing pediatric periodontal diseases

ObjectiveGiven the importance of diagnosing periodontal diseases in pediatric patients, the objective of this study was to examine knowledge, confidence, and clinical reasoning of third- and fourth-year dental students regarding periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning in pediatric patients. MethodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-method study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the survey questions were administered online to the third-and fourth-year dental students. Surveys tested for knowledge, confidence and clinical decision-making using questions and case-studies. Answers from periodontists and the pediatric dentists were used as the gold standard. For the next phase, individual interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded followed by verbal analysis to assess their clinical reasoning for the specific diagnosis and treatment planning. ResultsWhile there was no overall difference in the knowledge and the confidence level between the students, they differed from the experts for some questions in confidence levels. As measured using the Script Concordance Test (SCT), no significant differences were observed between the participants in their clinical reasoning. The verbal analysis of the interview data showed that the students used three different patterns for searching through the problem space. Most of the students used the forward pattern of search and reported low confidence in diagnosing and treating pediatric periodontal diseases. ConclusionDue to low self-reported confidence in diagnosing periodontal disease in pediatric patients. Providing education solutions will improve the confidence of undergraduate dental students in diagnosing and treating periodontal disease.

Development of script concordance test for assessment of clinical reasoning in nursing: Lessons learned regarding construct validity

BackgroundThe script concordance test (SCT) has been shown to be an effective tool to assess the clinical reasoning skills of nursing students. Various nursing studies have demonstrated the construct validity of this test. However, studies on the barriers that may impede construct validity during the development process are limited. ObjectiveThis evaluation describes the barriers to the development of SCT for Bachelor's nursing students and the lessons learned regarding construct validity. MethodsWe conducted a descriptive evaluation of the SCT development and a validation process was performed. The evaluation was based on written comments during the assessment (N = 327), a Student's Perspective Questionnaire (N = 100), and student feedback during three live review sessions (N = 27). ResultsDespite consideration of the guidelines during SCT development, we encountered three main barriers that may impede construct validity. We undertook the necessary efforts to recruit an appropriate expert panel. We overestimated the experts' and students' understanding of the SCT methodology. Additionally, four potential causes of invalid item construction were identified. These possible causes were ‘questionable intervention, hypothesis, or investigation’, ‘blurred data in new information’, ‘regression to the middle’, and ‘misinterpretation of the midpoint’. ConclusionThe three lessons learned are as follows: 1) The recruitment of an appropriate expert panel must not be underestimated. Besides clinical expertise, experts need training in SCT methodology, including awareness of possible pitfalls; 2) SCT training is a prerequisite for SCT as an assessment; and 3) student feedback may offer a deeper understanding of potential hidden script errors and causes for misinterpretation of SCT. Further studies are necessary to identify additional causes which may impede the construct validity of SCT in nursing education.

A study on the correlation of Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers: An observational study.

The objective was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of Doppler ultrasound in detecting cervical lymph nodes in patients diagnosed with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Patients undergoing surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers in the Otolaryngology Department from January 2021 to January 2023 were included. Two groups, with equal numbers, underwent ultrasound examination and intensive CT examination in the experimental and control groups, respectively, along with routine cervical lymph node dissection. A resident with over 6 years of clinical experience in the otolaryngology department performed routine bilateral cervical lymph node palpation. Sensitivity, specificity, and validity were compared among different examination methods. The McNemar test assessed specificity and sensitivity between palpation, color Doppler ultrasonography, and enhanced CT, while the Kappa concordance test evaluated the concordance between the 2 examination methods. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 23.0. Palpation showed a diagnostic sensitivity (DS) of 52.83% and specificity of 91.11% for all patients with cervical lymph node metastasis. Ultrasonography demonstrated a DS of 77.78% and specificity of 81.82% in patients with cervical lymph node metastasis, while intensive CT had a DS of 75.86% and specificity of 60.00%. Statistical significance (P < .05) was observed in the sensitivity between palpation and ultrasonography, and between palpation and enhanced CT. The specificity between enhanced CT and ultrasonography (P = .021) and between palpation and enhanced CT scan (P = .003) both showed statistical significance (P < .05). Doppler ultrasound yields diagnostic results highly consistent with pathological diagnoses in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Utilizing Doppler ultrasound can enhance the accuracy of diagnosing these cancers, aiding physicians in devising more suitable treatment plans for patients.

Evaluación de la sensibilidad y especificidad de la sigmoidoscopia en comparación con la colonoscopia en la detección de actividad inflamatoria intestinal en el seguimiento de pacientes con colitis ulcerosa

IntroductionUlcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease characterized by periods of inflammatory activity and remission, which vary from the rectum to the proximal colon. Currently, mucosal healing is a long-term goal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease, with colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy being the recommended tools for evaluation. ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of both examinations in determining the presence of inflammatory activity in the follow-up of patients with UC. MethodsRetrospective observational study analyzing colonoscopies performed as part of the follow-up of UC patients between January 2021 and July 2023 by gastroenterologists from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program at the Clínica Universidad de los Andes. The study compared endoscopic and histological activity observed in the rectosigmoid region with that found in the rest of the colon. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using concordance and correlations tests. ResultsA very good concordance and correlation were observed regarding endoscopic findings, with a Kappa index of 0.97 and a Spearman coefficient of 0.97. The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of sigmoidoscopy for endoscopic activity was 1, and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 0.96. In relation to histological activity, the concordance had a Kappa index of 0.93 and a Spearman coefficient of 0.93, with a PPV of sigmoidoscopy for histological activity being 1 and an NPV of 0.91. ConclusionThis cohort suggests that sigmoidoscopy is a cost-effective option for evaluating mucosal healing in UC patients in symptomatic and biomarker remission. However, complete colonoscopy should be considered in cases of discrepancies with the clinical picture or in colorectal cancer surveillance.

Le panel d’experts pour les tests de concordance de script : une référence réellement adéquate ?

The Script Concordance Tests (SCTs) are an examination modality introduced by decree in the French National Ranking Exam for medical students in 2024. Their objective is to evaluate clinical reasoning in situations of uncertainty. In practice, SCTs assess the impact of new information on the probability of a hypothesis formulated a priori based on an authentic clinical scenario. This approach resembles probabilistic (or Bayesian) reasoning. Due to the uncertainty associated with the explored clinical situation, SCTs do not compare the student's response to an expected one in a theoretical knowledge reference. Instead, the distribution of responses from a panel of experienced physicians is used to establish the question's scoring scale. Literature data suggest that physicians, even experienced ones, like most humans, often exhibit biased intuitive probabilistic reasoning. These biases raise questions about the relevance of using expert panel responses as scoring scales for SCTs.

High Prevalence of Laxative Use Among Those Tested for Clostridioides difficile Infection in VA Hospitals

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with 500,000 infections and 30,000 deaths per year. Inappropriate testing and treatment of patients with asymptomatic colonization occurs frequently (between 15% and 41%). The VA CDI guidelines emphasize avoidance of CDI testing in patients with laxative use within the previous 48 hours due to the high likelihood of non-infectious diarrhea. The objective of this study was to assess laxative administration among inpatients tested for CDI in VA hospitals and identify factors associated with guideline discordance. Methods: Adults hospitalized in Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan VA Medical Centers from January 2019-December 2022 with a CDI test performed during the admission were included. CDI tests included Toxin B gene Polymerase Chain Reaction or Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay. Tests were defined as positive, negative, or cancelled according to the diagnostic protocols of the VA testing laboratories. Laxative use, patient demographics, admission data, and comorbidities were collected from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Guideline discordant testing was defined as a diagnostic test for CDI ordered within 48 hours of a recorded laxative dose. Factors associated with discordant testing were analyzed using clustered binomial logistic regression models. Analyses were completed using SAS 9.4. Results: There were 7,326 tests ordered for 4,888 patients during the study. Patients were predominantly White (61.8%), male (95.6%), and elderly (mean age=70.0 standard deviation=12.1). Most (59.0%) patients had received at least one dose of laxative in the 48 hours preceding their CDI test. Being Black (Odds Ratio (OR)=0.86 (95%Confidence Interval (95%CI) =0.76,0.98) or Hispanic (OR (95%CI) =0.62(0.48,0.82) vs White) was associated with a decreased likelihood of inappropriate testing due to recent laxative use. Being tested at a rural facility (OR (95%CI) =1.23 (1.07,1.41) vs urban), within a long-term care (LTC) unit (OR (95%CI) =1.67 (1.41,1.97) vs inpatient), or within an intensive care unit (ICU) (OR (95%CI) =1.40 (1.24,1.59)) were all associated with an increased likelihood of being inappropriately tested. Guideline discordant tests were more likely to have negative results (OR (95%CI) =1.25 (1.05,1.49)) compared to guideline concordant tests. Discussion: Laxative administration in the 48 hours preceding CDI testing was common among hospitalized Veterans and associated with a lower likelihood of positive Results: This echoes non-VA studies where laxative use was reported at 44%. An increased likelihood of guideline discordant testing in ICU and LTC settings suggests the need for greater diagnostic stewardship interventions. Additionally, further work to determine negative outcomes associated with inappropriate testing are needed.

Comparação da monitorização invasiva e não invasiva da pressão arterial em Cuniculus paca (Paca)

Cuniculus paca, a South American wild rodent with zootechnical potential, requires anesthesia for management procedures. However, limited information is available regarding safe monitoring of this animal under anesthesia. This study aimed to compare with gold standard invasive method and validate non-invasive blood pressure measurements using an oscillometric monitor in Cuniculus paca. Eight healthy adult females undergoing general anesthesia for follicular aspiration were included. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were measured simultaneous using, oscillometric non-invasive monitor with its cuff placed on the radial artery and an invasive catheter placed in the dorsal metatarsal artery. Measurements were compared using the t-test, correlated by Pearson test, and analyzed using the Bland-Altman concordance test. The results indicated that only systolic pressure measured by non-invasive oscillometric methos was similar to the pressure measurement by invasive method (P=0.6372, r=0.5969, bias 0.59±20.9 mmHg); while mean and diastolic pressures were underestimated by the non-invasive method. In conclusion, non-invasive oscillometric monitor provides a valid and reliable method for systolic blood pressure measurement in Cuniculus paca under general anesthesia.

Impediments to building information modelling-enabled construction waste management in Nigeria

PurposeBuilding Information modelling (BIM) has the potential to significantly minimise the quantity of construction waste (CW), but its adoption is low in construction waste management (CWM). This study examined the factors impeding the adoption of BIM in CWM efforts at the design and precontract stages from the perspective of construction stakeholders in Nigeria.Design/methodology/approachThe study was informed by a post-positivism philosophical stance, which involved using the structured questionnaire as a quantitative research design tool for data collection via snowball sampling technique. The data garnered from construction experts were analysed using Cronbach’s alpha test, normalities test, Frequency, Percentage, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance and Chi-square tests, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), and exploratory factors analysis (EFA).FindingsThe study concluded that the awareness of BIM potential for CWM is high, but the adoption in waste management (WM) is low. The factor analysis reduced the twenty assessed factors into four key clusters of impediments to BIM adoption in CWM: (1) knowledge and resistance barriers, (2) support and interest barriers, (3) interoperability and experts' factors, and (4) economic barriers. These factors are critical impediments to BIM-enabled CWM at the design and precontract stage, and there was no significant statistical difference in their rating by the construction stakeholders in Nigeria.Originality/valueStudies on the impediments to BIM adoption in CWM efforts, primarily at the design and pre-contract stages in emerging countries are scarce. This sought to fill this literature gap by establishing the critical impediments that should be overcome to improve BIM use in CWM.

Comparison of Three Commercially Available, AI-Driven Cephalometric Analysis Tools in Orthodontics.

Background: Cephalometric analysis (CA) is an indispensable diagnostic tool in orthodontics for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Manual CA is time-consuming and prone to variability. Methods: This study aims to compare the accuracy and repeatability of CA results among three commercial AI-driven programs: CephX, WebCeph, and AudaxCeph. This study involved a retrospective analysis of lateral cephalograms from a single orthodontic center. Automated CA was performed using the AI programs, focusing on common parameters defined by Downs, Ricketts, and Steiner. Repeatability was tested through 50 randomly reanalyzed cases by each software. Statistical analyses included intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3) for agreement and the Friedman test for concordance. Results: One hundred twenty-four cephalograms were analyzed. High agreement between the AI systems was noted for most parameters (ICC3 > 0.9). Notable differences were found in the measurements of angle convexity and the occlusal plane, where discrepancies suggested different methodologies among the programs. Some analyses presented high variability in the results, indicating errors. Repeatability analysis revealed perfect agreement within each program. Conclusions: AI-driven cephalometric analysis tools demonstrate a high potential for reliable and efficient orthodontic assessments, with substantial agreement in repeated analyses. Despite this, the observed discrepancies and high variability in part of analyses underscore the need for standardization across AI platforms and the critical evaluation of automated results by clinicians, particularly in parameters with significant treatment implications.

INUDGE: Integration of liquid biopsy based next generation gene sequencing in newly diagnosed NSCLC—A stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial.

TPS8664 Background: The development of targeted therapies has changed the treatment paradigm for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the growing number of FDA approved targeted therapies, current NCCN guidelines recommend comprehensive molecular genotyping prior to first line (1L) therapy for all newly diagnosed patients with metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) NSCLC to enable the delivery of personalized therapy. Based on prior work that found improved detection of clinically actionable alterations through concurrent plasma (P) based next-generation gene sequencing (NGS) and tissue NGS, we piloted a behavioral economics (BE) informed electronic health record (EHR)-based “nudge” intervention designed to facilitate P NGS at the new patient medical oncology visit. After implementing across 3 practices within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), our findings demonstrated that EHR-based nudges are feasible and can promote guideline concordant diagnostic testing at both community and academic sites (1). Methods: Design: NCT05853887 is a prospective stepped wedge cluster randomized trial that includes 3 “clusters”, representing 6 community-based cancer centers. The primary objective of this trial is to test the effectiveness of a BE informed EHR nudge intervention to increase availability of comprehensive molecular test results before 1L therapy by incorporating concurrent tissue and plasma-based molecular testing. Secondary objectives include evaluation of contextual mechanisms contributing to the adoption, reach, and effectiveness of EHR nudge interventions with a lens for health equity. Intervention: An EHR-based nudge that allows for default order placement of P NGS testing at the time of the first medical oncology visit will be implemented. Subsequently, results detected on the default P NGS order will be conveyed to providers in the form of an electronic clinical decision support notification. Statistical Methods:Sample size is based on estimates of the proportion of patients undergoing comprehensive molecular testing prior to 1L. A sample of 3 clusters in a complete stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design with 4 time periods (including the baseline), 3 steps, 1 cluster(s) switching from control to treatment at each step, and an average of 120 subjects per cluster with an average of 30 subjects per cluster per time period (for a total sample size of 360 subjects) will provide 80% power to detect a difference between proportions of 0.21701. Patients with histological, or cytological diagnosis of Stage IV mNSq NSCLC who have not yet received systemic treatment for metastatic disease are eligible for inclusion. Enrollment is ongoing: Cluster 1 began enrollment in June 2023, Cluster 2 in October 2023, and Cluster 3 is planned for February 2024. 1. Aggarwal C et al, JCO, Vol 40, Num 16, Suppl Jun 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05853887 .

A Prompt for Generating Script Concordance Test Using ChatGPT, Claude, and Llama Large Language Model Chatbots

Medical education always evolves to incorporate more tools for specific needs in assessing clinical reasoning skills. Among these tools, Script Concordance Test (SCT) has a particular importance due to its focus on assessing decision-making in uncertain clinical situations. However, development of SCT items is effortful. Artificial intelligence tools, such as large language models, offer significant benefits. These models are already used for generating multiple-choice questions, and their use in generating SCTs offers great promise. However, this requires well-designed prompts to generate SCTs. This article proposes a generic prompt for the ChatGPT-4, Claude 3, Llama 3, and ChatGPT-4o large language model chatbots to generate SCTs, which can be tailored to various fields of medicine and different stages of medical education. It can help to streamline the development process of SCTs. Initial findings are promising, and there is a need for generating SCTs using large language models and conducting research to assess the quality of SCTs.

Perimetria da cintura e abdomen: avaliação do ponto ótimo em pacientes com fator de risco para doenças cardiovasculares e em indivíduos aparentemente saudáveis

Introduction: One of the criteria for stratification of cardiometabolic risk (CMR) is waist circumference (WC). However, some guidelines have used abdominal circumference (ABC). Objective: To evaluate and compare the validity of WC and ABC in the determination of CMR in apparently healthy adult individuals or with risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in both sexes. Methods: one hundred ninety three men and two hundred and twenty women (18-74 years). WC and ABC were measured and submitted to the normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and to the homogeneity test (Levene test). The Wilcoxon test was applied, and the results presented in median and interquartile intervals were applied. Formulas were developed and the Spearman’s Correlations were applied. The Bland-Altman’s concordance Test and the percentage difference calculation of the groups were performed. The level of significance adopted was (p&lt;0.05) and the analyses performed with the Sigma Plot Software for Windows version 11.0, copyright© 2008 System Software, Inc. Results: The groups showed significant difference for man (p=0.032) with values for WC 86.5(80-97) cm and ABC 89.5(83-101) cm. And for women showed significant difference for (p=0.001) with values for WC 79(72-88) cm and ABC 86(79.5-97) cm. Percentage differences were 9.8 for men and 46.8 for women, and the correlations of (r=0.98) and (r=0.96), respectively. The differences between the comparison of the measurements that presented divergence in the CMR classification were (p=0.001)/both sexes. The formulas were developed in the Sigma Plot Software - WC = 0.75 + 0.98 X (ABC) for men and women - WC = 2.52 + 0.89 X (ABC). Conclusion: In both sexes, anthropometric measurements showed significant differences and if ABC was adopted, almost half of the female sample would be mistakenly included in the CMR classification. Keywords: metabolic syndrome; obesity; physical exercise; lifestyle; primary health care.

Waist and abdomen perimetry: evaluation of the optimal point in patients with risk factor for cardiovascular disease and in apparently healthy individuals

Introduction: One of the criteria for stratification of cardiometabolic risk (CMR) is waist circumference (WC). However, some guidelines have used abdominal circumference (ABC). Objective: To evaluate and compare the validity of WC and ABC in the determination of CMR in apparently healthy adult individuals or with risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in both sexes. Methods: one hundred ninety three men and two hundred and twenty women (18-74 years). WC and ABC were measured and submitted to the normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and to the homogeneity test (Levene test). The Wilcoxon test was applied, and the results presented in median and interquartile intervals were applied. Formulas were developed and the Spearman’s Correlations were applied. The Bland-Altman’s concordance Test and the percentage difference calculation of the groups were performed. The level of significance adopted was (p&lt;0.05) and the analyses performed with the Sigma Plot Software for Windows version 11.0, copyright© 2008 System Software, Inc. Results: The groups showed significant difference for man (p=0.032) with values for WC 86.5(80-97) cm and ABC 89.5(83-101) cm. And for women showed significant difference for (p=0.001) with values for WC 79(72-88) cm and ABC 86(79.5-97) cm. Percentage differences were 9.8 for men and 46.8 for women, and the correlations of (r=0.98) and (r=0.96), respectively. The differences between the comparison of the measurements that presented divergence in the CMR classification were (p=0.001)/both sexes. The formulas were developed in the Sigma Plot Software - WC = 0.75 + 0.98 X (ABC) for men and women - WC = 2.52 + 0.89 X (ABC). Conclusion: In both sexes, anthropometric measurements showed significant differences and if ABC was adopted, almost half of the female sample would be mistakenly included in the CMR classification. Keywords: metabolic syndrome; obesity; physical exercise; lifestyle; primary health care.

Digital Health Education for the Future: The SaNuRN (Santé Numérique Rouen-Nice) Consortium's Journey.

SaNuRN is a five-year project by the University of Rouen Normandy (URN) and the Côte d’Azur University (CAU) consortium to optimize digital health education for medical and paramedical students, professionals, and administrators. The project includes a skills framework, training modules, and teaching resources. In 2027, SaNuRN is expected to train a significant portion of the 400,000 health and paramedical professions students at the French national level. Our purpose is to give a synopsis of the SaNuRN initiative, emphasizing its novel educational methods and how they will enhance the delivery of digital health education. Our goals include showcasing SaNuRN as a comprehensive program consisting of a proficiency framework, instructional modules, and educational materials and explaining how SaNuRN is implemented in the participating academic institutions. SaNuRN is a project aimed at educating and training health-related and paramedics students in digital health. The project results from a cooperative effort between URN and CAU, covering four French departments. The project is based on the French National Referential on Digital Health (FNRDH), which defines the skills and competencies to be acquired and validated by every student in the health, paramedical, and social professions curricula. The SaNuRN team is currently adapting the existing URN and CAU syllabi to FNRDH and developing short-duration video capsules of 20 to 30 minutes to teach all the relevant material. The project aims to ensure that the largest student population earns the necessary skills, and it has developed a two-tier system involving facilitators who will enable the efficient expansion of the project’s educational outreach and support the students in learning the needed material efficiently. With a focus on real-world scenarios and innovative teaching activities integrating telemedicine devices and virtual professionals, SaNuRN is committed to enabling continuous learning for healthcare professionals in clinical practice. The SaNuRN team introduced new ways of evaluating healthcare professionals by shifting from a knowledge-based to a competencies-based evaluation, aligning with the Miller teaching pyramid and using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination and Script Concordance Test in digital health education. Drawing on the expertise of URN, CAU, and their public health and digital research laboratories and partners, the SaNuRN project represents a platform for continuous innovation, including telemedicine training and living labs with virtual and interactive professional activities. The SaNuRN project provides a comprehensive, personalized 30-hour training package for health and paramedical students, addressing all 70 FNRDH competencies. The program is enhanced using AI and NLP to create virtual patients and professionals for digital healthcare simulation. SaNuRN teaching materials are open-access. The project collaborates with academic institutions worldwide to develop educational material in digital health in English and multilingual formats. SaNuRN offers a practical and persuasive training approach to meet the current digital health education requirements.

Using ChatGPT in Psychiatry to Design Script Concordance Tests in Undergraduate Medical Education: Mixed Methods Study.

Undergraduate medical studies represent a wide range of learning opportunities served in the form of various teaching-learning modalities for medical learners. A clinical scenario is frequently used as a modality, followed by multiple-choice and open-ended questions among other learning and teaching methods. As such, script concordance tests (SCTs) can be used to promote a higher level of clinical reasoning. Recent technological developments have made generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems such as ChatGPT (OpenAI) available to assist clinician-educators in creating instructional materials. The main objective of this project is to explore how SCTs generated by ChatGPT compared to SCTs produced by clinical experts on 3 major elements: the scenario (stem), clinical questions, and expert opinion. This mixed method study evaluated 3 ChatGPT-generated SCTs with 3 expert-created SCTs using a predefined framework. Clinician-educators as well as resident doctors in psychiatry involved in undergraduate medical education in Quebec, Canada, evaluated via a web-based survey the 6 SCTs on 3 criteria: the scenario, clinical questions, and expert opinion. They were also asked to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the SCTs. A total of 102 respondents assessed the SCTs. There were no significant distinctions between the 2 types of SCTs concerning the scenario (P=.84), clinical questions (P=.99), and expert opinion (P=.07), as interpretated by the respondents. Indeed, respondents struggled to differentiate between ChatGPT- and expert-generated SCTs. ChatGPT showcased promise in expediting SCT design, aligning well with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria, albeit with a tendency toward caricatured scenarios and simplistic content. This study is the first to concentrate on the design of SCTs supported by AI in a period where medicine is changing swiftly and where technologies generated from AI are expanding much faster. This study suggests that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in creating educational materials, and further validation is essential to ensure educational efficacy and accuracy.