Terms Of Stance Research Articles

Putin’s puppets in the West? The far right’s reaction to the 2022 Russian (re)invasion of Ukraine

While an argument that the far right supports Putin is popular, comparative analysis of far-right parties’ stances on Russia is generally lacking. In the wake of the 2022 Russian (re)invasion of Ukraine, this becomes increasingly problematic. This study aims to fill this gap and provide an initial answer(s) to an increasingly important question of who supports Putin's Russia within the Western world. First, I examine the immediate reactions to the 2022 (re)invasion of far-right parties across the European Union. Based on the findings, new sub-categories within the far right in terms of stances on Putin’s Russia are proposed. Second, I provide a comparative analysis of the roll-call votes in the European Parliament on resolutions condemning Russia’s actions and test the proposed sub-categories.

Pengaruh Permainan Sirkuit Akar Pensil Terhadap Hasil Belajar Gerak Dasar Pencak Silat Kelas V SD

This study aims to determine the effect of the pencil root circuit game on the learning outcomes of the basic movements of Pencak silat. This study used an experimental method with a one group pretest-posttest design. The research was conducted by practicing the movements of the easel, step patterns, punches, and kicks in martial arts material. The subject or sample of this study was grade V elementary school students with a total of 24 students. Data collection techniques use purposive samples and are analyzed using quantitative descriptions and difference tests. The results of this study show that using pencil root circuit games can improve students' abilities in terms of stance, step patterns, punches, and kicks on martial arts material. There is an increase because the game can foster students' willingness to do something to be more than before. Conclusion, there is an influence of pencil root circuit games on the learning outcomes of basic pencak silat movements of grade V elementary school students.
 Keyword : Basic Pencak Silat Motion, Circuit Game, Elementary School

Evidence-Based Psychodynamic Therapies for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a serious health issue associated with a high burden for the individual and society. Among the “Big Four” of evidence-based treatments for patients with BPD are two psychodynamic therapies that have evolved from classic psychoanalytic treatment with a change of setting and change of focus: Transference-Focused Psychotherapy (TFP) and Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT).This overview provides a comparison of the two treatments in terms of stance, clinical concepts, costs and key interventions. Furthermore, the current literature on the efficacy of both treatments is reviewed.While TFP focuses on the content of disintegrated representations of self and other, MBT focuses on the processing of mental states. Both treatments diverge in their clinical concepts and interventions for the treatment of BPD.Although both treatments are regarded as effective in treating BPD, no direct comparison of both treatments has been made so far. Future studies are needed to investigate mechanisms of change and derive recommendations for a differential indication.Specialized therapies for BPD have favorable drop-out rates and outcome compared to non-specialized ones.MBT and TFP have very diverse clinical concepts and interventions for the treatment of BPD.Both, MBT and TFP show efficacy in RCTs.No trial has directly compared MBT and TFP; there is no evidence base for differential indication.Specialized therapies for BPD have favorable drop-out rates and outcome compared to non-specialized ones.MBT and TFP have very diverse clinical concepts and interventions for the treatment of BPD.Both, MBT and TFP show efficacy in RCTs.No trial has directly compared MBT and TFP; there is no evidence base for differential indication.

Allusive References and Other‐Oriented Stance in an Affinal Avoidance Register

This paper analyzes the social‐relational dynamics of in‐law name avoidance in Datooga, a Nilotic language spoken in Tanzania. Datooga women avoid referring to their senior affines by birth name, while also avoiding words that “allusively” refer to these in‐laws by sharing lexical or phonetic material with their names. These acts of name avoidance are conceptualized here in terms of stance: each instance of avoidance orients the speaker toward her affinal kin. The analysis of this unusual phenomenon emphasizes how speakers construct social relations in discourse not only with immediate speech participants but also with absent others, across time and space.

Six Authors and the Saturday Review : A Quantitative Approach to Style

The distinctive corporate style of the Saturday Review was recognized by Victorians and is often mentioned in modern periodicals scholarship. In this quantitative study, we highlight characteristics that distinguish the journal’s writing from other periodicals in terms of stance rather than political orientation or subject matter. We also compare the writing style of six contributors to the Saturday Review and other periodicals. On one end of the spectrum was George Henry Lewes, who, according to our research, assumed a consistent style when writing for the Saturday Review and any other journal. On the other end of the spectrum was Lord Robert Cecil, whose work for the Saturday Review was strikingly different stylistically than his other writings.

Stances and paradigms: a reflection

This paper compares and contrasts the concept of a stance with that of a paradigm qua disciplinary matrix, in an attempt to illuminate both notions. First, it considers to what extent it is appropriate to draw an analogy between stances (which operate at the level of the individual) and disciplinary matrices (which operate at the level of the community). It suggests that despite first appearances, a disciplinary matrix is not simply a stance writ large. Second, it examines how we might reinterpret disciplinary matrices in terms of stances, and shows how doing so can provide us with a better insight into non-revolutionary science. Finally, it identifies two directions for future research: “Can the rationality of scientific revolutions be understood in terms of the dynamic between stances and paradigms?” and “Do stances help us to understand incommensurability between disciplinary matrices?”