Terms Of Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Pharmacoeconomic study of the effectiveness of cytogenetic studies in patients with MM before prescribing first-line therapy

Purpose of the study. Conducting an assessment of the economic consequences (clinical and economic analysis) when conducting cytogenetic studies before prescribing various first-line treatment regimens for multiple myeloma (MM). Materialsand methods. The pharmacoeconomic study was carried out using the method of cost analysis, “cost-effectiveness” within the framework of the State Guarantee Program (SGP). Results. A review of the literature demonstrated that a limited number of data are currently available on the clinical effectiveness of the analyzed regimens in the first line, both in patients with normal and high cytogenetic risk. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that among the three studied 1st-line treatment regimens (VMP, Rd, VRd), in terms of PFS (progression-free survival), the coefficient was minimal for the VMP regimen in patients with high cytogenetic risk. Conclusion. The study showed that the choice and prescription of first-line therapy, depending on the results of a cytogenetic study, is a clinically effective and cost-effective approach to organizing medical care for adult patients with multiple myeloma in the Russian Federation. This could be used in the future to formulate.

Occult metastasis is no burden factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients when adhering to a standardized approach in neck dissection

ObjectivesManagement of the neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is pivotal to oncologic control and survival. However, there is controversy regarding necessity of neck dissection (ND) in patients with clinically node-negative neck. We aimed to assess risk factors for occult metastasis and to explore whether the presence of occult lymph node metastases (LNMs) has an impact on recurrence and survival.Material and methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with primary OSCC who underwent radical tumor resection and ND in a high-volume center adhering to the prevailing German guideline. The ND was performed according to a standardized approach.ResultsFour hundred twenty-one patients with primary surgically treated OSCC were included. The incidence of occult metastasis was 14.49%. A pathological T stage > 1 (multivariate analysis, odds ratio (OR) 3.958, p = 0.042) and the presence of extranodal extension in LNMs (multivariate analysis, OR 0.287, p = 0.020) were identified as independent risk factors for occult metastasis. When comparing patients with and without occult metastasis, there were no significant differences in terms of progression-free survival (log-rank, p = 0.297) and overall survival (log-rank, p = 0.320). There were no cases of ipsilateral neck recurrence. One patient developed contralateral neck metastasis; however, he initially presented with a unilateral pT1 pN0 tumor.ConclusionsOverall, our findings suggest that conducting a standardized approach in ND should be applied in terms of management of the neck in order to maintain survival rates and to prevent neck recurrence in OSCC patients.Clinical relevance.None of the risk factors for occult metastasis can be reliably assessed preoperatively. Although elective ND does not guarantee the complete prevention of neck recurrence, it increases the likelihood of either timely removal of micrometastases or strengthens the justification for adjuvant therapy. Consequently, this approach leads to improvements in clinical outcomes.

A retrospective analysis of the prognostic impact of KRAS G12D mutation in patients with RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.

105 Background: KRAS is an oncogene that is mutated in about half of all metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Recently, a novel therapy targeting KRAS G12C mutation has demonstrated promising efficacy for advanced solid tumors, including mCRC. A therapy targeting KRAS G12D mutation is also under development and promising efficacy is expected. However, the prognostic impact of the KRAS G12D mutation in patients with mCRC is still unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC harboring RAS mutation who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2013 and December 2022 at our hospital in Japan. We compared the survival outcomes between patients with KRAS G12D mutation (G12D group) and those with non- KRAS G12D mutations (non-G12D group) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were estimated by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 340 patients were included in this study. The main RAS mutations were KRAS G12D in 80 patients (23.4%), KRAS G12V in 72 (21.2%), KRAS G13D in 43 (12.6%) and KRAS G12C in 16 (4.7%). There were 80 patients in the G12D group and 260 in the non-G12D group. Patient backgrounds did not differ significantly in terms of age (median 61/63), sex (male 49%/48%), performance status (PS0 32%/32%), site of primary tumor (right 33%/32%), number of metastatic sites (3≤ 28%/23%), treatment regimen (doublet 90%/92%, triplet 3%/4%), or first line bevacizumab (yes 81%/79%). Median PFS was 9.2 months (95%CI: 7.8-12.2) in the G12D group vs. 11.5 months (95%CI: 9.2-13.1) in the non-G12D group (HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.73-1.28]; p=0.81). Median OS was 25.8 months (95%CI: 18.8-39.8) vs 32.9 months (95%CI: 28.5-36.1) (HR 0.84 [95%CI: 0.60-1.19]; p=0.33). Second-line treatment was administered in 55 (69%) vs 192 (74%) patients in the G12D and non-G12D group, respectively. Conversion surgery was performed in 4 (5%) vs 18 (7%) patients in the G12D and non-G12D group, respectively. Multivariate analysis adjusted for PS, sex, age, site of primary tumor, number of metastatic sites and treatment regimen showed no significant differences in PFS and OS between the G12D and non-G12D groups. Conclusions: The KRAS G12D mutation did not show a detrimental prognostic impact on PFS and OS compared to KRAS non-G12D mutations in patients with RAS-mutated mCRC.

Real-world data of anlotinib for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases in China.

738 Background: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors, such as gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic cancer (PC), often develop liver metastases with poor prognosis. Recent clinical studies have implicated that anlotinib (a novel anti-angiogenesis agent) could improve survival outcomes in gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases, albeit with limited real-world evidence. This study aimed to report the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases in real-world practice. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of patients treated with anlotinib in any line of treatment for solid tumors with liver metastases (excluding primary liver cancer) was collected retrospectively through 5 large hospitals in China, between Jan, 2016 and Feb, 2023. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective overall response (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), hepatic ORR (hORR) and safety. In this abstract, we present data from patients with gastrointestinal tumors. PFS, hPFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: A total of 475 patients were enrolled in the study and 238 patients with gastrointestinal tumors were analyzed, including 73 (30.7%) GC, 71 (29.8%) CRC, 46 (19.3%) ESCC, 24 (10.1%) PC, and 24 (10.1%) BTC. 75.2% were <75 years old, 82.4% were male, 63.9% had a normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5-24 kg/m2), 87.8% received third-line anlotinib, and 90.3% received anlotinib monotherapy. At data cut-off (Feb 28, 2023), the median PFS was 5.90 months (95% CI: 5.23-6.77), the median hPFS was 6.20 months (95% CI: 5.27-6.77), and the median OS was 9.37 months (95% CI: 8.40-NR). There was no statistically significant difference according to the tumor types in terms of PFS (p=0.66), hPFS (p=0.8) and OS (p=0.72). We also found patients with a BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 had significantly shorter PFS (p=0.005) and hPFS (p=0.01). Adverse events (AEs) were manageable and tolerable, 30 (12.6%) patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and 3 patients (1.3%) had ≥3 TEAEs. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (5.9%). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world report about anlotinib for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases in China, showed the clinical benefit of anlotinib in any line of treatment for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases and indicated that anlotinib could be a feasible treatment option in this specific population.

Phase I/II clinical trial of regorafenib plus durvalumab (MEDI4736) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced biliary tract cancers.

TPS581 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of cancers affecting the epithelial lining of the intra- and extrahepatic portions of the biliary tree, ranking as the second most prevalent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. A subgroup of BTC was found to have an abundant tumor specific neoantigen expression, enriched expression of immune related genes and genes regulating inhibitory immune checkpoint proteins. Recent advancements in BTC treatment include the TOPZ-1 trial, which established the survival advantage of adding durvalumab to the gemzar + cisplatin regimen with an estimated 24-month overall survival rate of 24.9% versus 10.4% for placebo. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival favored durvalumab at 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P=0.001). Objective response rates also showed improvement, with 26.7% for durvalumab and 18.7% for placebo. Furthermore, single agent regorafenib has exhibited efficacy in patients with refractory advanced metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, particularly in terms of progression-free survival, favoring regorafenib over placebo, the overall toxicity profile was as expected. Regorafenib targets multiple tyrosine kinases and has been reported to show immunomodulatory properties that may counteract tumor-induced immunosuppression, providing a rationale for combining it with checkpoint inhibitors. We believe that modulating the tumor microenvironment with small molecule inhibitors like regorafenib will have synergistic effect when combined with checkpoint-based immunotherapy like durvalumab in patients with chemo refractory BTC. Methods: This study comprises a single-arm, unblinded Phase I/II trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy involving regorafenib and durvalumab in patients with chemo-refractory advanced BTC. The Phase I portion employed a 3 + 3 design with two dose levels of regorafenib (80 mg and 120 mg) administered in conjunction with 1500 mg IV durvalumab every 28 days. Phase I successfully completed, and the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) endorsed the continuation of the trial as planned. Eligibility: Histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic disease. Progressed on at least one line of therapy. May have received checkpoint inhibitor in the past. Inclusion criteria also include ECOG PS 0-1. Objectives:Primary Phase I: Safety of regorafenib in combination with durvalumab.Phase II: Progression-free survival (PFS).Secondary:Disease Control Rate (DCR), Overall response rate (ORR), Overall survival (OS). Statistical Plan: Interim futility testing after one year, halting if conditional power < 20%. Final analysis: PFS and OS via Weibull Regression. Enrollment is currently ongoing with 8 out of 40 patients enrolled.

A network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety for first-line and second/further-line therapies in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer

BackgroundHormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR + /HER2 −) advanced breast cancer is a prevalent subtype among postmenopausal women. Despite the growing number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) exploring this topic, the efficacy and safety of first-line and second/further-line treatments remain uncertain. Accordingly, our aim was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of these therapies through network meta-analysis.MethodsRCTs were identified by searching Pubmed, Embase, and major cancer conferences. The efficacy of interventions was assessed using the hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while safety was indicated by the incidence of any grade adverse events (AEs), grade 3–5 AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and AEs leading to death. Both time-variant HRs fractional polynomial models and time-invariant HRs Cox-proportional hazards models were considered for handling time-to-event data. Safety indicators were analyzed using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on patient characteristics.ResultsA total of 41 RCTs (first-line 17, second/further-lines 27) were included in the analysis. For first-line treatment, the addition of Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors to endocrine therapy significantly improved therapeutic efficacy in terms of both PFS and OS, demonstrating the best performance across all mechanisms. Specifically, the combination of Abemaciclib and Letrozole demonstrated the most favorable performance in terms of PFS, while Ribociclib plus Fulvestrant yielded the best outcomes in OS. Incorporating the immune checkpoint inhibitor Avelumab into the regimen with CDK4/6 inhibitors and selective estrogen receptor degraders significantly enhanced both PFS and OS in second-line or later treatments. Regarding safety, endocrine monotherapy performed well. Regarding safety, endocrine monotherapy performed well. There is mounting evidence suggesting that most CDK4/6 inhibitors may demonstrate poorer performance with respect to hematologic AEs. However, additional evidence is required to further substantiate these findings.ConclusionsCDK4/6 inhibitors, combined with endocrine therapy, are pivotal in first-line treatment due to their superior efficacy and manageable AEs. For second/further-line treatment, adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy may produce promising results. However, to reduce the results’ uncertainty, further trials comparing these novel treatments are warranted.Trial registrationRegistration number: PROSPERO (CRD42022377431).

Beneficial Use of the Combination of Gemcitabine and Dacarbazine in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Real-World Data.

The combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine has exhibited efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for aSTSs, albeit without robust confirmation from larger clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective study in a single institution involving aSTS patients treated with gemcitabine and dacarbazine. 95 patients were assessed, pointing to a benefit in PFS of 3.5 months and an OS of 14.2 months. Patients with translocated histotypes had better PFS, while those with platelet-lymphocyte ratios (PLRs) surpassing a specific threshold or lower albumin levels had poorer overall survival. This study validates previous findings from three phase I-II trials, affirming the utility of this treatment approach in routine clinical practice.

Immunohistochemical analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor as a predictive biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma – A cross-sectional study of 33 cases on computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy specimens

Background: Lung cancer is the second most common cause of cancer in all ages and both genders and is the leading cause of cancer death. Two major groups of lung cancers are – small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC). Due to discovery of driver mutation such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in NSCLC, the paradigm of lung cancer therapy has shifted from cytotoxic platinum based therapy to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. In this study, we have analyzed EGFR expression in NSCLC by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and studied the response to TKI therapy in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Aims and Objectives: In this study, we have retrospectively analyzed the EGFR overexpression in adenocarcinoma of lung in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimen by IHC analysis and correlated with the therapeutic response and survival rate (OS and PFS) in lung carcinoma patients. Materials and Methods: We have analyzed retrospectively EGFR expression in lung adenocarcinoma cases (computed tomography-guided CNB specimen) by IHC. In our study, we have used monoclonal primary antibodies against two most common EGFR mutations, that is, L858R point mutation and E 746–A 750 deletion. Results: Out of 33 cases, EGFR expression was seen in 28 cases. For EGFR expression assessment by IHC, both cytoplasmic and/or membranous staining taken into consideration. EGFR positivity was interpreted only when >10% tumor cells having 2+ or more intensely staining pattern. The response to TKI therapy in terms of PFS and OS was also studied. Conclusion: IHC analysis of EGFR mutation using specific antibodies has extremely high specificity with good sensitivity. Use of targeted therapy in the form of TKI in EGFR positive lung adenocarcinoma has high response rate and long duration of survival (PFS and OS) with acceptable toxicity profile in contrast to the conventional therapy.

Technical evaluation of a novel digital PCR platform for detecting EGFR/KRAS mutations in NSCLC archived plasma specimens

IntroductionKRAS p.G12C hot spot mutations has rapidly modified diagnostic algorithm for lung cancer patients electing Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients to target treatment. As regards, patients that harbor this hallmark showed a clinical benefit in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison with control group under target treatment. In this scenario, KRAS p.G12C mutation requires optimized testing strategy in diagnostic routine practice. Although the widespread diffusion of NGS platforms, a not negligible percentage of Italian diagnostic institutions adopt singleplex technology (RT-PCR, dPCR) for molecular testing. Here, we aim to technically validate a novel dPCR system (QIAcuity™ Digital PCR System, Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) on a retrospective series of cfDNA samples from previously tested with a custom NGS system. (1,2)Methods: n = 50 liquid biopsy specimens (n = 25 KRAS/EGFR mutated and n = 25 wild type for actionable KRAS/EGFR mutations) from diagnostic routine NSCLC patients previously tested with a custom NGS panel were retrieved from our internal archival. Each sample was tested by adopting n = 5 KRAS and n = 3 EGFR commercially available dPCR assays on QIAcuity™ Digital PCR System (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany); an ultra-deep dPCR walk-away platform that automatizes molecular analysis. Technical sensitivity, technical specificity, and concordance rate between “gold standard” NGS system and QIAcuity™ Digital PCR System (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) were assessed. ResultsOverall, all specimens were successfully analyzed with dPCR system. In details, 24 out of 25 mutated and 21 out of 24 wild type cases were detected. A technical sensitivity, specificity, and a concordance rate of 96.0 % (24/25), 88.0 % (22/25) and 92.0 % (46/50) were evaluated taking into account a MAF cut-off ≥ 0.2 % and a partition number of 100 positive partitions in wild-type channel. ConclusionQiacuity (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) platform enables accurate molecular analysis of diagnostic routine specimens. Optimized technical workflow is required to technically implement this platform in diagnostic routine setting.

Comparison of different maintenance regimens following first-line immunochemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunochemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the ideal combination strategy and maintenance regimen remain uncertain. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of different first-line maintenance regimens for advanced EGFR/ALK (epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma Kinase) negative NSCLC and explore the eligibility of chemo-free maintenance. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 1,510 EGFR/ALK negative NSCLC patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment in our center from 2019 to 2021. Patients who had controlled disease after 2-6 cycles of first-line ICIs in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenesis were included. Four maintenance regimens were analyzed: ICIs plus platinum-free chemotherapy with (group 1, I+C+A) or without anti-angiogenesis maintenance (group 2, I+C), single-agent ICIs maintenance (group 3, I) or ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis maintenance (group 4, I+A). For group 3-4, rechallenge with initial chemo-agents was given upon the first progression, those who achieved controlled disease were repeatedly followed by another chemo-free period. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, for group 3-4, PFS was characterized as the duration between treatment initiation and failure of rechallenge (last disease progression). In total, 140 eligible patients in the maintenance phase were analyzed, with 20, 40, 42, and 38 patients in groups 1 to 4, respectively, displaying comparable baselines. Median PFS was similar in the I+C+A maintenance group (22.6 months), I+C maintenance group (21.0 months), and I+A maintenance group (21.5 months), whereas PFS was inferior in group 4 with I maintenance alone (13.4 months). Median chemo-free duration were 6.3 months in I maintenance group, while 13.5 months in I+A maintenance group. During the maintenance period of group 1 to 4, 25%, 25%, 19%, and 42% of patients experienced partial response (PR) again, respectively. Fifty-five percent, 65%, 48% and 61% of patients sustained durable disease control at the end of follow-up. In group 4, 39% of patients received progressive disease (PD) and rechallenge initial chemo-agents. Fifty percent of patients achieved PR and resumed to chemo-free maintenance. We showed that following first-line immunochemotherapy, chemo-free maintenance by ICIs plus anti-angiogenesis and on-demand chemo-rechallenge provided comparable efficacy to chemo-on maintenance in terms of PFS, thus allowing the minimization of cytotoxic drugs without compromising therapeutic effectiveness. In addition, anti-angiogenesis is essential during chemo-free maintenance.

Surgical outcomes and follow-up results of 53 pediatric craniopharyngioma cases: a single-center study.

Craniopharyngiomas are locally invasive neoplasms, and they cause potential lifelong morbidity because of their tendency for local recurrence. Despite advancements in endoscopic techniques, gross-total resection (GTR) of tumors with invasion or adhesion to important surrounding anatomical structures is extremely difficult. The authors present a single-center study that evaluated the impact of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) on the surgical outcomes of pediatric craniopharyngiomas, the factors affecting the resection rate, and recurrence. A total of 44 pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) who were treated via the EEA for craniopharyngioma from August 1997 to June 2022, as well as their 53 operations, were included in this study. The preoperative radiological configuration and surgical data of these cases were assessed. Also, preoperative and postoperative clinical (endocrinologic, neurological, and ophthalmological), hypothalamic, physical and social development, and neurocognitive assessment data were described. In total, 37 cases (69.8%) had no history of operation beforehand. The most common symptoms at presentation were endocrine disturbances (98.1%), headache without vomiting (84.3%), and visual disturbance (51%). Cases were classified as infrasellar (1.9%), sellar (32.1%), sellar-suprasellar (52.8%), and suprasellar (13.2%) localization. GTR was achieved in 34/53 cases (64.1%). The rate of GTR was higher in infrasellar and sellar tumors compared with sellar-suprasellar and suprasellar tumors (p = 0.003), and preoperative hypothalamic involvement was associated with lower likelihood of GTR (p = 0.024). Moreover, with experience, the rate of GTR increased (p = 0.037). Postoperative complications, other than endocrine impairment, occurred in 10/53 cases (18.9%). The mean duration of follow-up was 53.57 months. At follow-up, 21/53 (39.6%) cases presented with tumor recurrence. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 48.5%. There was a statistically significant difference between the GTR and other-than-GTR groups in terms of PFS (p < 0.001). According to univariate analysis, smaller tumor (p = 0.017), infrasellar and sellar localization (p = 0.031), and GTR (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with decreased rate of recurrence. Also, there was a statistically significant association between the recurrence rate and adhesion strength of the tumor (p < 0.001). This retrospective cohort study revealed surgical indications for EEA, as well as factors affecting the resection rate, recurrence, and quality of life during the follow-up period of the included cases. The authors believe that GTR should be the goal for craniopharyngioma treatment, but the authors' treatment approach was to provide a balance between radical surgery with maximum safety and adjuvant treatment for long-term disease control.

Unveiling Novel Therapeutic Targets for CAR Therapy in Multiple Myeloma through Single-Cell RNA Sequencing

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells. Among the different therapeutic options in this setting, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells recently showed unprecedent achievements in term of progression free survival. However, despite advancements in current therapies, the disease's heterogeneity remains a major challenge and all patients unavoidably relapse, rendering innovative approaches to identify precise therapeutic targets eagerly awaited. Along this line, the revolution of single-cell (sc) technologies brings new opportunities to identify precise therapeutic targets, including abundant and unique surface proteins for CAR therapy. In this study, by analyzing individual cancer cells at sc level, we aim to identify novel surface targets, facilitating the development of novel personalized cellular therapies as well as treatment sequences. To this end, we used samples collected from 9 publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets (GEO accession numbers: GSE176131, GSE189460, GSE223060, GSE210079, GSE145977, GSE124310, GSE161801, GSE163278, GSE161722) obtained from 156 patients affected by monoclonal gammopathies (19 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 10 smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), 78 MM and 25 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)) and 24 normal bone marrows (NBM), to conduct an unbiased search for genes showing specific expression in plasma cells (PCs), regardless of disease status. We found 15 genes showing differential expression in PCs (adj.pval&amp;lt;0.01 and logFC&amp;gt;1) and coding for surface proteins: TNFRSF17(BCMA), SDC1 (CD138), FCRL5 (GPRC5D), TNFRSF13B (TACI), CD38, SLAMF7 (CS1), CD59, FCGR2B, FGFR3, SLC44A1 (CTL1), CD320, FCRL2, IL15RA, INSR and SLAMF1. As expected, most of these molecules already represent critical therapeutic targets. After completing our initial analysis, we compared PCs transcriptomes from MM/RRMM patients with NBM, MGUS, and SMM samples. Among previously identified genes, CD320 only was significantly overexpressed in MM PCs. Next, we investigated associations between cytogenetic-related cell subclusters and previously identified surface markers. Interestingly, we found a significant association between the expression levels of TACI/CD59 and the overexpression of CCND2 and MAF, both associated with the presence of t(14:16). Next, we decided to focus on the first five genes (according to expression ranking) that do not currently have an active clinical development program in advanced phases, namely: TNFRSF13B, CD59, FCGR2B, SLC44A1, and CD320 (Fig. 1 A, values dichotomized based on their median) to uncover their (potential) impact/association with patient's outcome. In our analysis of different available expression profiling datasets (GSE4204, GSE2658, GSE57317, GSE4581, GSE4452, GSE9782, the CoMMpass study NCT01454297) involving around 2000 MM patients, we observed TNFRSF13B, CD59, and FCGR2B expression correlated with improved outcome while CD320 and SLC44A1 expression associated with worse outcome (Fig. 1 B). In conclusion, we integrated results from both scRNAseq and bulk-RNAseq/microarray data to identify new targets genes to be used in the context of personalized medicine. Interestingly, CD320 emerges as a potential candidate biomarker useful for monitoring disease evolution and predicting worse outcomes. Additionally, this approach led us to identify a series of potential new targets for MM patients, depicting a new scenario where each patient could be “screened” to identify the best molecule to be targeted. While further investigation is necessary to assess off-target toxicity and confirm clinical relevance, our analyses significantly streamline the search for tumor markers with a method potentially applicable to different malignancies, bringing us closer to identifying the best candidates for effective CAR therapy.

Safety Profile in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Undergoing Treatment with 1st and 2nd Generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Multicentric Real-World Experience

INTRODUCTION Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most frequent leukemia, being more frequent in older adults. Bruton's tyrosinkinase inhibitors (BTKi) have revolutionized the treatment, displacing immunochemotherapy treatment in all patient profiles. The selectivity profile in the action of these drugs means that the toxicity of first and second generation BTKi is different, resulting in higher rates of atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension, mainly in patients treated in the second line or later, while maintaining their efficacy. Real-life studies are needed to be able to demonstrate the effects in first-line treatment in a more heterogeneous patient profile, without the strict exclusion and inclusion criteria used in clinical trials. METHODS An observational, retrospective, multicenter, retrospective study was performed. Patients with in treatment with Ibrutinib or Acalabrutinib in first line or later were included. Demographic data, comorbidity, cytogenetic and mutational disease data, adverse effect profile, comprehensive geriatric assessment (if applicable) and treatment response evaluation data are collected. RESULTS A total of 91 patients were included with a median age of 73.22 years SD 11.06. Fifty-three (58.2%) were male. Fifty-three (58.2%) were treated in frontline, 31.9% (29) in second line and 9.9% (9) in subsequent lines. Acalabrutinib was used in 25 (27.5%) patients and Ibrutinib in 66 (72.5%). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Differences were revealed between these two BTKis in terms of line of treatment, with the majority being treated first (P=0.006) and Rai stage, with Rai II predominating (P=0.014). No differences were found between the two BTKis according to the rest of the characteristics. In terms of toxicity, 14 (15.4%) of patients treated with Ibrutinib developed arterial hypertension, compared to no patients in the Acalabrutinib arm (p=0.009). With respect to the development of cardiac toxicity, 19 (20.9%) patients suffered some cardiotoxic event, 3 (3.3%) in patients on acalabrutinb and 16 (17.6%) on ibrutinib, with no significant differences found between the two drugs (p=0.2). No significant differences were found with respect to other toxicities (hematologic, digestive, bleeding and infections). Table 2 No differences were found in terms of progression-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The iBTKs have changed the treatment of CLL, although the second-generation iBTKs have a safer cardiovascular profile and are just as effective in our cohort, even in the frontline.

Low-Intensity and Chemo-Free Treatments in Ph+ ALL: Progression-Free Survival Based on Indirect Comparisons.

In Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LLA), growing evidence has accumulated regarding the efficacy of low-intensity and chemo-free regimens. Our objective was to analyze all recent trials evaluating these treatments and to compare them in terms of efficacy. We applied the Shiny method, an artificial intelligence technique, to analyze Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstruct patient-level data. Reconstructed patient data were then evaluated through standard survival statistics and subjected to indirect head-to-head treatment comparisons. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Based on 432 reconstructed patients, eight trials were analyzed. The survival data from these trials were pooled into three types of treatments: (i) treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (denoted as TKICHE); (ii) TKIs associated with steroids with no chemotherapy (TKISTE); (iii) chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab plus TKIs (TKIBLI). According to the Shiny method, the three PFS curves were reported in a single Kaplan-Meier graph and subjected to survival statistics. In terms of PFS, TKIBLI ranked first, TKICHE second, and TKISTE third; the differences between these three regimens were statistically significant. This multi-treatment Kaplan-Meier graph, generated through the Shiny method, summarized the current evidence on these treatments in both qualitative and quantitative terms.

Quantifying the impact of novel metastatic cancer therapies on health inequalities in survival outcomes

Background: Novel therapies in metastatic cancers have contributed to improvements in survival outcomes, yet real-world data suggest that improvements may be mainly driven by those patient groups who already had the highest survival outcomes. This study aimed to develop and apply a framework for quantifying the impact of novel metastatic cancer therapies on health inequalities in survival outcomes based on published aggregate data.Methods: Nine (N = 9) novel therapies for metastatic breast cancer (mBC), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) were identified, 3 for each cancer type. Individual patient data (IPD) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were replicated from published Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. For each cancer type, data were pooled for the novel therapies and comparators separately and weighted based on sample size to ensure equal contribution of each therapy in the analyses. Parametric (mixture) distributions were fitted to the weighted data to model and extrapolate survival. The inequality in survival was defined by the absolute difference between groups with the highest and lowest survival for 2 stratifications: one for which survival was stratified into 2 groups and one using 5 groups. Additionally, a linear regression model was fitted to survival estimates for the 5 groups, with the regression coefficient or slope considered as the inequality gradient (IG). The impact of the pooled novel therapies was subsequently defined as the change in survival inequality relative to the pooled comparator therapies. A probabilistic analysis was performed to quantify parameter uncertainty.Results: The analyses found that novel therapies were associated with significant increases in inequalities in survival outcomes relative to their comparators, except in terms of OS for mNSCLC. For mBC, the inequalities in OS increased by 13.9 (95% CI: 1.4; 26.6) months, or 25.0%, if OS was stratified in 5 groups. The IG for mBC increased by 3.2 (0.3; 6.1) months, or 24.7%. For mCRC, inequalities increased by 6.7 (3.0; 10.5) months, or 40.4%, for stratification based on 5 groups; the IG increased by 1.6 (0.7; 2.4) months, or 40.2%. For mNSCLC, inequalities decreased by 14.9 (−84.5; 19.0) months, or 12.2%, for the 5-group stratification; the IG decreased by 2.0 (−16.1; 5.1) months, or 5.5%. Results for the stratification based on 2 groups demonstrated significant increases in OS inequality for all cancer types. In terms of PFS, the increases in survival inequalities were larger in a relative sense compared with OS. For mBC, PFS inequalities increased by 8.7 (5.9; 11.6) months, or 71.7%, for stratification based on 5 groups; the IG increased by 2.0 (1.3; 2.6) months, or 67.6%. For mCRC, PFS inequalities increased by 5.4 (4.2; 6.6) months, or 147.6%, for the same stratification. The IG increased by 1.3 (1.1; 1.6) months, or 172.7%. For mNSCLC, inequalities increased by 18.2 (12.5; 24.4) months, or 93.8%, for the 5-group stratification; the IG increased by 4.0 (2.8; 5.4) months, or 88.1%. Results from the stratification based on 2 groups were similar.Conclusion: Novel therapies for mBC, mCRC, and mNSCLC are generally associated with significant increases in survival inequalities relative to their comparators in randomized controlled trials, though inequalities in OS for mNSCLC decreased nonsignificantly when stratified based on 5 groups. Although further research using real-world IPD is warranted to assess how, for example, social determinants of health affect the impact of therapies on health inequalities among patient groups, the proposed framework can provide important insights in the absence of such data.

Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease for Efficacy of Rituximab Maintenance in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Elderly Trial.

The outcome of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved by the introduction of immunochemotherapy, followed by rituximab (R)-maintenance. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) represents a promising tool for individualized treatment decisions and was a prospectively planned part of the European MCL Elderly trial. We investigated how MRD status influenced the efficacy of R-maintenance and how MRD can enable tailored consolidation strategies. Previously untreated patients with MCL age 60 years or older have been randomly assigned to R versus interferon-alpha maintenance after response to rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (R-FC) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP). MRD monitoring was performed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) following EuroMRD guidelines. A qPCR assay with a median sensitivity of 1 × 10-5 could be generated in 80% of 288 patients in an international, multicenter, multilaboratory setting. More extensive tumor dissemination facilitated the identification of a molecular marker. The efficacy of R-maintenance in clinical remission was confirmed for MRD-negative patients at the end of induction in terms of progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.63]) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.68]), particularly in R-CHOP-treated patients (PFS-HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.52]; OS-HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.52]). R-maintenance appeared less effective in MRD-positive patients (PFS-HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26 to 1.02]) overall and after R-CHOP induction (PFS-HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.26]). R-FC achieved more frequent and faster MRD clearance compared with R-CHOP. MRD positivity in clinical remission after induction was associated with a short median time to clinical progression of approximately 1-1.7 years. The results confirm the strong efficacy of R-maintenance in patients who are MRD-negative after induction. Treatment de-escalation for MRD-negative patients is discouraged by our results. More effective consolidation strategies should be explored in MRD-positive patients to improve their long-term prognosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Methods: A literature search was conducted of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and was limited to the English literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to July 2022 were considered for inclusion. The outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAE). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the PD-L1 expression status, and the differences between first- and second-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were estimated. Results: We included five RCTs comprising 3584 patients in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy did not significantly prolong OS [hazard ratios (HR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00] or PFS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.32). However, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy significantly improved both OS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96) and PFS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that in mUC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 5%, treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone did not reduce the risk of death. Safety analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone did not significantly increase the incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Conclusions: The results show that use of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone as first-line treatment is similar to chemotherapy in terms of both survival and response rates. However, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy has a significant benefit in terms of PFS or OS. Nonetheless, more RCTs are warranted to evaluate efficiency and safety in the combination regimen of chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Primary Tumor Resection in Synchronous Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Upfront Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab: A Pooled Analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 Studies.

The decision to resect or not the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a complex and challenging issue for oncologists, especially when an antiangiogenic-based therapy is planned. Patients enrolled in the phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies that compared upfront FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or FOLFOX + bevacizumab, respectively, were included. We assessed the association of primary tumor resection (PTR) with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR), rate of grade > 2 adverse events (AEs), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs in the overall population and according to the treatment arm. Of the 999 patients included, 513 (51%) underwent PTR at baseline. Longer PFS and OS were observed in resected patients compared to those with unresected primary tumors: 11.2 vs. 10.0 months (p < 0.001) and 26.6 vs. 22.5 (p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate models, PTR was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for better PFS (p = 0.032) and OS (p = 0.018). Patients with PTR experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (p = 0.055) and lower incidence of anemia (p = 0.053), perforation (p = 0.015), and serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were noted in incidence of bleeding (p = 0.39). The benefit of FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab in terms of PFS (p for interaction: 0.46), OS (p for interaction: 0.80), ORR (p for interaction: 0.36), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was independent of PTR. PTR at baseline was independently associated with good prognosis in synchronous mCRC patients and with lower incidence of serious gastrointestinal and surgical AEs during upfront chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The benefit and toxicity profile of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab was independent of PTR.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): New Approaches and Controversies on the Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery has been extensively studied in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, and it holds promise as a therapeutic strategy, but its role remains elusive. The aim of this study was to assess the existing evidence for the use or not of HIPEC in primary debulking surgery (PDS), interval debulking surgery (IDS), and recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), evaluated in terms of survival rates and post-surgical morbidity. Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane, and Medscape were systematically searched for any article comparing the use of HIPEC treatment with any other therapy in patients with ovarian cancer in PDS, IDS, and ROC. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. We only considered English-language published studies. We included 14 studies, including two RCTs with a total of 1813 women, published between 2003 and 2023 with a recruitment period between 1998 and 2020. In PDS, there were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) between HIPEC and controls [MD -5.53 months [95% CI -19.91 to 8.84 months]; I2 = 96%]. Conversely, in patients treated with NACT, pooled results showed a significant survival advantage in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the combined HIPEC plus IDS group rather than surgery alone [PFS: MD 4.68 months (95% CI 3.49 to 5.86 months, I2 = 95%); OS: MD 11.81 months (95% CI 9.34 to 14.27 months); I2 = 97%]. Concerning ROC patients, pooled MD did not show either a significant PFS difference between intervention and controls [MD 2.68 months (95% CI 433 to 9.70 months); I2 = 95%], and OS significant difference (MD 6.69 months [95% CI -9.09 to 22.47 months]; I2 = 98%). Severe post-operative complications (≥grade 3) were available in 10 studies, accounting for 1108 women. Overall, there was a slightly but significantly increased risk with the combined approach compared to controls [RR 1.26 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.55); I2 = 0%]. The combination of HIPEC with cytoreductive surgery prolongs OS and PFS in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after NACT with acceptable morbidity. However, additional trials are still needed to determine the effectiveness of HIPEC in primary and recurrence settings. In the era of personalized medicine, the correlation between the efficacy of HIPEC and biological and molecular findings represents a challenge for the future of ovarian cancer.

Cost-utility analysis of Palbociclib + letrozole and ribociclib + letrozole versus Letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Iran using partitioned survival model

BackgroundPalbociclib and Ribociclib are cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 oral molecular inhibitors that have the potential to improve overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to analyze the cost-utility of Palbociclib and Ribociclib in comparison with Letrozole monotherapy as the first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) MBC patients in Iran.MethodsA Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) was conducted using a partitioned survival model (PSM) from the perspective of the Iranian healthcare system. The comparative strategies considered were Palbociclib + Letrozole, Ribociclib + Letrozole, and Letrozole monotherapy. The model was structured with a 1-month cycle length and a 15-year time horizon. Clinical safety, efficacy, and survival data in terms of PFS and OS for Palbociclib + Letrozole and Ribociclib + Letrozole were obtained from the latest updates of the PALOMA-1, 2, and MONALEESA-2 studies, respectively. Direct medical costs, including drug costs, visits, hospitalization, CT scans, bone x-rays, monitoring and laboratory testing, as well as medication side effects, were considered. Uncertainty evaluations were performed through deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Excel 2016 and TreeAge 2020 were used for all stages of the evaluation.ResultsThe base case results indicated that, despite its lower effectiveness, Letrozole monotherapy was the most cost-effective strategy, while Palbociclib + Letrozole and Ribociclib + Letrozole were not cost-effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for Palbociclib + Letrozole and Ribociclib + Letrozole compared to Letrozole monotherapy were estimated at $137,302 and $120,478 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), respectively, which exceeded the target threshold of $4565. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the CUA results were not sensitive to changes in the values of uncertain variables. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis also indicated that Palbociclib + Letrozole and Ribociclib + Letrozole had no chance of being cost-effective based on changes in various parameters and simulations.ConclusionsPalbociclib and Ribociclib showed significant efficacy in combination with Letrozole, as evidenced by improvements in PFS. However, in the first-line treatment of MBC in Iran, these strategies were not cost-effective compared to Letrozole monotherapy.