I'LL BEGIN THE WAY MANY CONVERSATIONS begin nowadays--by telling you about my kids. First, there's Alice. She's very bright but has an overactive imagination. In this picture (figure 1, see over), she has been babysitting, but she dreams that the baby has turned into a pig--or, rather, it has turned back into a pig, since that is probably what it was start with. (It had only been masquerading as a child.) It's just as well, muses Alice: If it had grown up [...] it would have a dreadfully ugly child: but it makes rather a handsome pig, I think (Carroll 55-56). Then there's Ida. She too is very bright, and like Alice is given babysitting. But sometimes she doesn't focus on her responsibilities. This was a problem one day when goblins came and stole her baby sister, replacing her with one of ice (figure 2). Taking wonder horn in hand, Ida had infiltrate the goblin wedding and extricate her baby sister from the Dionysian riot so that a crooning and clapping baby could be returned mama from the children's frenzied tempest (Sendak np). Then there's David, fresh from The Midwich Cuckoos and residing in The Village of the Damned (figure 3). Like the girls above, he too is preternaturally bright, and again this causes some consternation. As it turns out, David is not a human child at all but is one of dozens of alien implants, each of whom has used his mother's womb merely as an incubation nest. From human families used and discarded, these juvenile impersonators will gather in socially and politically dangerous pods, killing any humans who get in their way. Which leads me my fourth child, Damien Thorn of The Omen (figure 4, see previous page). Here is the ultimate child: the son of Satan born of a jackal and adopted into a powerful American family live as normal, only until he can rise the American presidency and, eventually, world domination. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] [FIGURE 2 OMITTED] [FIGURE 3 OMITTED] [FIGURE 4 OMITTED] From folk stories and the Golden Age of Children's Literature through science fiction the contemporary Gothic, we are plagued with children. Such is, in the first instance, a descriptor, the particular quality of a thing. As the OED reminds us, appears as an adjective in the fifteenth century mean something made in imitation of something else, [...] not genuine, [...] spurious, sham. This definition would clearly name the children I have just enumerated: pigs, goblins, aliens, and demons all pretending be children but who clearly aren't. In this sense, though, also functions as a verb and, paradoxically, as the opposite of the counterfeit. These children make visible the ease with which fraud is detected and sham exposed. (This opposite meaning, significantly, is buried in the term's etymology, for comes from the Latin contra-facere, meaning to make in opposition or contrast and thus oppose the act of imitation.) At stake, then, is the ways in which numerous genres--whether for children or about them--inscribe the child as both the thing we wish the child be and the thing that actively resists or undoes that wished-for thing, as both the quality of a child and that quality's undoing. But a still larger sense of the is also in operation here. It's the sense that comes us from Jean Baudrillard, who sees the invention of the as endemic the invention of modernity, and, I will argue, the invention of childhood as an ontological category. For Baudrillard, the European Renaissance is the age of the counterfeit in that signs of prestige once belonging the feudal lord and having value in themselves (the gold coin, the tract of land, the offspring) came be democratized across a middle class who used these signs signify their prestige, that is, deploy these signifiers as referents of themselves, rather than as guarantors of their own value (50). …
Search from 250 M+ research papersSearch from 250 M+ research papers
Open Access
Sep 6, 2023
Jelka Pirkovič + 1
