Terlipressin Infusion Research Articles

Continuous enteral feeding at home and continuous infusion of terlipressin: two antipodean controlled trials aimed at improving the vigor of patients with advanced cirrhosis

Continuous enteral feeding at home and continuous infusion of terlipressin: two antipodean controlled trials aimed at improving the vigor of patients with advanced cirrhosis

Letter to the Editor: Impact of long-term continuous terlipressin infusion on the liver transplant waitlist in an Australian cohort.

Letter to the Editor: Impact of long-term continuous terlipressin infusion on the liver transplant waitlist in an Australian cohort.

Efficacy and Safety of Terlipressin Infusion in Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury (HRS-AKI): A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is an event that occurs in chronic liver disease (CLD) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Terlipressin, a vasopressin analog, is used for the treatment of portal hypertension-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and is found to be effective in the management of HRS-AKI. Continuous infusion of terlipressin maintains a high mean arterial pressure while reducing adverse events. It is better tolerated and equally effective at lower doses than intravenous boluses in patients with HRS-AKI. Aim of the study This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of terlipressin infusion at the rate of 4 mg/day in the treatment of HRS-AKI. Methods This retrospective study included patients who had HRS-AKI according to the modified International Club of Ascites (ICA) definition. Patients were started on a continuous intravenous infusion. The included patients received terlipressin 1 mg stat followed by a 4 mg infusion over 24 hours, and the infusion was continued until specific response criteria were met or for a maximum of seven days. Results In total, 136 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the study group was 45 years, the mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score was 11, the mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 30, and the mean serum creatinine was 2.46 mg/dl. A response to treatment in the form of reduction of serum creatinine was observed in 94 (69.1%) patients, 30 (22%) patients showed no response, and worsening of creatinine was seen in 12 (8.8%) patients. The mean duration of hospital stay was 7.6 days, the mean serum creatinine was 1.17 mg/dl at the end of treatment, and the mean CTP and MELD scores in treatment responders were nine and 27, respectively. A total of 29 (21.3%) of 136 patients had adverse events during the terlipressin infusion therapy. Conclusion Terlipressin infusion has sustained effects on splanchnic hemodynamics with fewer and less severe adverse events than intravenous bolus doses. Terlipressin infusion at a dose of 4 mg/day appeared to be well tolerated, with similar outcomes to that of 2 mg/day with a significantly lower albumin dose. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing treatment protocols, particularly those favoring infusion methods, to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

Long-Term Continuous Terlipressin Infusion Improves Cardiac Reserve in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

Cardiac dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of hepatorenal syndrome, for which terlipressin is the recommended first-line treatment. This study investigates whether long-term terlipressin can ameliorate the subclinical cardiac dysfunction observed in decompensated cirrhosis. Twenty-two patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites enrolled in a prospective study of home continuous terlipressin infusion were included. Cardiac function was assessed using dobutamine stress echocardiogram before and after 12 weeks of terlipressin. The primary outcome was the impact of terlipressin on cardiac reserve, the change in cardiac output (CO) in response to stress. The median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 56-64 years), the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 15 (interquartile range, 12.3-17.0), and 72.7% were male. The increase in CO in response to low-dose dobutamine was significantly higher following terlipressin (↑4.0 L/min [↑57.8%]) as compared with baseline (↑1.8 L/min [21.3%]) (P= .0001). The proportion of patients with impaired cardiac reserve (defined by ΔCO <25% after low-dose dobutamine) reduced from 81.8% at baseline to 40.9% after terlipressin, (P= .02), driven primarily by improvement in inotropic function. Resting CO decreased significantly after terlipressin from 8.9 ± 2.2 L/min to 7.2 ± 1.8 L/min (normal range 5-6 L/min) (P < .001), due to a decrease in stroke volume from 108 to 86 mL/beat (P= .006). Long-term continuous terlipressin infusion resulted in a significant increase in cardiac reserve and attenuation of the hyperdynamic state usually observed in decompensated cirrhosis. These data provide important mechanistic insight into the pathogenesis and reversibility of cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis. Future studies are required to evaluate whether long-term terlipressin can prevent hepatic decompensating events such as hepatorenal syndrome in high-risk individuals. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Number: ACTRN12619000891123.

A Noninferiority Trial Comparing 2 Days vs 5 Days of Terlipressin and Ceftriaxone in Terms of 5-Day Rebleeding for Patients With Acute Gastroesophageal Variceal Hemorrhage.

This trial was to shorten the duration of both vasoconstrictors and prophylactic antibiotics to only 2 days in the therapy of acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage. After successful endoscopic hemostasis of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage, eligible patients were randomized to receive terlipressin infusion 1 mg per 6 hours and ceftriaxone 1 g daily for 5 days (group A) or a similar regimen for 2 days (group B). Primary end points were very early rebleeding at 5 days, and secondary end points included 48-hour hemostasis, 42-day rebleeding, and hospitalization days. Group A comprised 48 patients, and group B comprised 52 patients. Both groups were comparable in the severity of liver disease. Forty-eight-hour initial hemostasis was 95.8% in group A and 100% in group B ( P = 0.13). Very early rebleeding between 3 and 5 days occurred in 1 patient (2.1%) in group A and 2 patients (3.8%) in group B ( P = 0.60). The difference was 1.8% and the 95% confidence interval was -1.31% to 2.08%, which demonstrated noninferiority. Forty-two-day rebleeding occurred in 5 patients (10.4%) in group A and 4 patients (7.7%) in group B ( P = 0.63). The median hospitalization days were 8.5 ± 3.8 days in group A vs 5.6 ± 2.6 days in group B ( P < 0.001). After successful endoscopic hemostasis of acute variceal bleeding, combination of 2-day terlipressin infusion and ceftriaxone therapy was not inferior to the 5-day regimen in terms of very early rebleeding, with the advantage of shortening hospitalization stay.

#2564 Terlipressin given by continuous infusion versus boluses in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is one of the complications among patients with cirrhosis. Available guidelines recommended terlipressin with albumin as part of HRS management. To date there is no consensus on whether terlipressin should be given via bolus or continuous intravenous infusion. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses of terlipressin in the treatment of patients with HRS and cirrhosis. Method A comprehensive search for databases of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses of terlipressin among adult patients with hepatorenal syndrome was done. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using relevant terms including hepatorenal syndrome, acute kidney injury, cirrhosis, terlipressin, bolus, and continuous infusion until December 2023. Response to therapy defined as decrease in serum creatinine or regression of acute kidney injury was the primary outcome of interest, while safety in terms of drug-related events, mortality, and transplant-free survival were the secondary outcomes. Data extraction was performed using a standardized data form. The reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus among the authors. Random-effects meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.4. Results A total of three studies, one high quality and two moderate quality RCTs, were included in the review, involving a total of 240 patients. Pooled analysis showed that continuous infusion was as effective or better than bolus infusion in achieving the primary outcome (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95-1.32, I2 = 0%). In one study, 28- and 90-day mortality were not significantly different, while 90-day transplant-free survival was not significantly different between continuous and bolus groups from another trial (53% vs 69% p = 0.26). Higher incidence of adverse events were also reported in the bolus group, RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13-1.04 (p = 0.06). Conclusion There is limited evidence to suggest that continuous infusion of terlipressin may demonstrate resolution of acute kidney injury more frequently than bolus infusion, and that continuous infusion is associated with decreased adverse events. Larger randomized controlled trials with higher quality are needed to ascertain the effects on mortality, need for renal replacement therapy, and transplant-free survival.

Safety and efficacy of continuous terlipressin infusion in HRS-AKI in a transplant population.

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While liver transplantation is the definitive treatment, continuous terlipressin infusion for HRS-AKI may provide benefit and, as such, was assessed in a population composed of candidates for liver transplant (LT). Fifty hospitalized LT-eligible patients with HRS-AKI received a single bolus followed by continuous terlipressin infusion. Acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3, serum creatinine (SCr)>5.0mg/dL, or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≥35 were exclusions. Fifty hospitalized patients who received midodrine and octreotide or norepinephrine for HRS-AKI served as a historical comparator cohort. Complete response (CR) was defined as a ≥30% decrease in SCr with end-of-treatment (EOT) SCr≤1.5, partial response as a ≥30% decrease in SCr with EOT SCr>1.5, and nonresponse as a <30% decrease in SCr. CR rate was significantly higher in the terlipressin cohort compared to the historical cohort (64% vs. 16%, p <0.001). Survival, while numerically higher in those who received terlipressin, was statistically similar (D30: 94% vs. 82%, p =0.12; D90: 78% vs. 68%, p =0.37). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was more common among terlipressin NR than CR and PR (70% vs. 3% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). EOT MELD and SCr were significantly lower within terlipressin cohort (MELD: 19 vs. 25, SCr: 1.4 vs. 2.1mg/dL, p <0.001). Sixteen of 40 terlipressin-treated patients received LT-alone (terlipressin CR in 10/16). One patient on terlipressin had a hypoxic respiratory failure that responded to diuretics; one possibly had drug-related rash. With continuous terlipressin infusion, a CR rate of 64% was observed with a favorable safety profile. Terlipressin use was associated with lower EOT MELD and SCr than the historical midodrine and octreotide/norepinephrine cohort; LT-alone was accomplished in a high proportion of complete terlipressin responders.

Early Versus Standard Initiation of Terlipressin for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF: A Randomized Controlled Trial (eTerli Study).

Terlipressin infusion is effective in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI). However, its efficacy for HRS-AKI resolution in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients has been suboptimal. Progression of AKI is rapid in ACLF. We investigated whether early initiation of terlipressin(eTerli) can improve response rates. Consecutive ACLF patients with stage II/III AKI despite albumin resuscitation (40g) were randomized to receive terlipressin at 2mg/24h plus albumin at 12h (ET, n = 35) or at 48h as standard therapy (ST, n = 35). (June 22, 2020 to June 10, 2022). The primary end-point was AKI reversal by day7. Baseline parameters including AKI stage and ACLF-AARC scores in two arms were comparable. Full AKI response at day 7 was higher in ET [24/35 (68.6%)] than ST arm [11/35 (31.4%; P 0.03]. Day3 AKI response was also higher in ET arm [11/35 (31.4%) vs. 4/35 (11.4%), P 0.04]. Using ST compared to ET [HR 4.3; P 0.026] and day 3 serum creatinine > 1.6mg/dl [HR 9.1; AUROC-0.866; P < 0.001] predicted HRS-AKI non-response at day 7. ET patients showed greater improvement in ACLF grade, mean arterial pressure, and urine output at day 3, and required lower albumin within 7days than ET arm (149.1 ± 41.8g vs. 177.5 ± 40.3g, P 0.006) and had lower 28-day mortality: 40% vs. 65.7%, P 0.031]. Early use of terlipressin than ST [HR 2.079; P 0.038], baseline HE [HR 2.929; P 0.018], and AKI persistence at day 3 [HR 1.369; P 0.011] predicted 28-day mortality. Fifteen (21.4%) patients had treatment related adverse effects, none was life threatening. In ACLF patients, early initiation of terlipressin for AKI persisting after 12h of volume expansion with albumin helps in reduced short-term mortality and early AKI reversal with regression of ACLF stage. These results indicate need for change in current practice for terlipressin usage in HRS-AKI.

Continuous home terlipressin infusion increases handgrip strength and reduces ascites-A prospective randomized crossover study.

Observational studies suggest a beneficial effect of continuous terlipressin infusion (CTI) on ascites and sarcopenia in decompensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. This single-center, prospective, cross-over study randomized 30 patients with cirrhosis, ascites, and sarcopenia to commence on 12 weeks of home CTI or 12 weeks of observation prior to cross-over. The co-primary outcomes were change in handgrip strength and paracentesis volume. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, sarcopenia measures, renal function, safety, and hospitalization. The median age of participants was 62 years (IQR: 57-64), the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium was 16 (12.3-20.8), and 22 (73%) were male. Handgrip strength increased by a mean adjusted difference (MAD) of 3.09 kg (95% CI: 1.11-5.08 kg) between CTI and observation ( p =0.006); an 11.8% increase from baseline. The total volume of ascites drained decreased by a MAD of 11.39L (2.99-19.85, p =0.01), with 1.75 fewer episodes of paracentesis (0.925-2.59, p <0.001) on CTI. Serum creatinine decreased, urinary sodium excretion increased, and quality of life was significantly higher on CTI (all p <0.001), with an increase in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of 0.41 points (0.23-0.59). There were 7 minor line-related complications but no cardiac events or pulmonary edema. This novel study demonstrates a significant increase in handgrip strength, reduction in paracentesis volume, and improved quality of life in patients with decompensated cirrhosis treated with continuous terlipressin infusion. These findings provide a strong rationale for the use of ambulatory CTI in appropriately selected patients with cirrhosis.

Efficacy and safety of terlipressin infusion during liver surgery: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionLiver disease causes 2 million deaths annually, accounting for 4% of all deaths worldwide. Liver surgery is one of the effective therapeutic options. Bleeding is a major complication during liver...

Evaluation of terlipressin-related patient outcomes in hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury using point-of-care echocardiography.

Treatment of hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), with terlipressin and albumin, provides survival benefits, but may be associated with cardiopulmonary complications. We analyzed the predictors of terlipressin response and mortality using point-of-care echocardiography (POC-Echo) and cardiac and renal biomarkers. Between December 2021 and January 2023, patients with HRS-AKI were assessed with POC-Echo and lung ultrasound within 6 hours of admission, at the time of starting terlipressin (48 h), and at 72 hours. Volume expansion was done with 20% albumin, followed by terlipressin infusion. Clinical data, POC-Echo data, and serum biomarkers were prospectively collected. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) was defined per 2020 criteria. One hundred and forty patients were enrolled (84% men, 59% alcohol-associated disease, mean MELD-Na 25±SD 5.6). A median daily dose of infused terlipressin was 4.3 (interquartile range: 3.9-4.6) mg/day; mean duration 6.4 ± SD 1.9 days; the complete response was in 62% and partial response in 11%. Overall mortality was 14% and 16% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Cutoffs for prediction of terlipressin nonresponse were cardiac variables [ratio of early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic tissue doppler velocity > 12.5 (indicating increased left filling pressures, C-statistic: 0.774), tissue doppler mitral velocity < 7 cm/s (indicating impaired relaxation; C-statistic: 0.791), > 20.5% reduction in cardiac index at 72 hours (C-statistic: 0.885); p < 0.001] and pretreatment biomarkers (CysC > 2.2 mg/l, C-statistic: 0.640 and N-terminal proBNP > 350 pg/mL, C-statistic: 0.655; p <0.050). About 6% of all patients with HRS-AKI and 26% of patients with CCM had pulmonary edema. The presence of CCM (adjusted HR 1.9; CI: 1.8-4.5, p = 0.009) and terlipressin nonresponse (adjusted HR 5.2; CI: 2.2-12.2, p <0.001) were predictors of mortality independent of age, sex, obesity, DM-2, etiology, and baseline creatinine. CCM and reduction in cardiac index, reliably predict terlipressin nonresponse. CCM is independently associated with poor survival in HRS-AKI.

INFUSE: Rationale and design of a multi-center, open label, collaborative study to treat HRS-AKI with continuous terlipressin infusion

BackgroundHepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) carries significant morbidity and mortality among those with end-stage liver disease. Bolus terlipressin for treatment of HRS-AKI received FDA approval in September 2022. US implementation of terlipressin, however, is hindered by the paucity of local data on the optimal patient population and administration mode, as well as the effect on transplant priority. The INFUSE study is designed to evaluate the use of continuous terlipressin infusion among transplant candidates with advanced liver disease and HRS-AKI. MethodsFifty prospective patients with HRS-AKI will receive a single bolus of terlipressin 0.5 mg followed by continuous infusions of terlipressin from 2 to 8 mg/day for up to 14 days. The cohort will be enriched with those listed, in evaluation, or eligible for liver transplantation, while those with ACLF grade 3, MELD ≥35, and serum creatinine >5.0 mg/dL will be excluded. Fifty patients who received midodrine plus octreotide or norepinephrine for HRS-AKI will serve as a retrospective comparator cohort. ConclusionThe INFUSE study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of continuous terlipressin infusion among largely transplant-eligible patients with HRS-AKI, and to provide US-based data on transplant outcomes. This novel study design simultaneously mitigates terlipressin adverse events while providing renal benefits to patients, thus addressing the unmet medical need of those with HRS-AKI who have limited treatment options and are awaiting liver transplantation in the US.

Continuous vs. intermittent terlipressin infusion for portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Portal hypertension, a major complication of chronic liver disease, often leads to life-threatening variceal bleeding, managed effectively with vasoactive drugs like terlipressin. However, the most optimal method of terlipressin administration, continuous versus intermittent infusion, remains a subject of debate, necessitating this systematic review and meta-analysis for evidence-based decision-making in managing this critical condition. This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA standards and explored multiple databases until 6 April 2023, such as MEDLINE through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met specific inclusion criteria. After assessing study quality and extracting necessary data, statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan), with results presented as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences. Five RCTs (n=395 patients) were included. The continuous terlipressin group had a significantly lower risk of rebleeding (RR=0.43, P=0.0004) and treatment failure (RR=0.22, P=0.02) and fewer total adverse effects (RR=0.52, P<0.00001) compared to the intermittent group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in mean arterial pressure (P=0.26), length of hospital stays (P=0.78), and mortality rates (P=0.65). This study provides robust evidence suggesting that continuous terlipressin infusion may be superior to intermittent infusions in reducing the risk of rebleeding, treatment failure, and adverse effects in patients with portal hypertension. However, further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are required to confirm these findings and to investigate the potential benefits of continuous terlipressin infusion on mortality and hospital stays.

S1623 Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Continuous Infusion vs Intravenous Bolus Administration of Terlipressin in Patients With Cirrhosis

S1623 Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Continuous Infusion vs Intravenous Bolus Administration of Terlipressin in Patients With Cirrhosis

THE TREATMENT OF HEPATORENAL SYNDROME WITH TERLIPRESSIN: CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS INFUSION VS INTRAVENOUS BOLUSES A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY ON SYNDROME

Objective: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe complication of cirrhosis, with terlipressin and albumin being the most common treatment. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of continuous intravenous infusion vs. intravenous boluses of terlipressin in treating type 1 h.&#x0D; Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on cirrhosis patients with type 1 h. Patients were allocated to receive terlipressin via continuous infusion (TERLI-INF group) or intravenous boluses (TERLI-BOL group). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and treatment details were recorded. The primary endpoint was the frequency of drug-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints included therapy responsiveness and 90-day transplant-free survival.&#x0D; Results: Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. While treatment length and cumulative albumin doses were comparable, TERLI-INF patients received lower terlipressin doses. Severe treatment-related adverse events differed between groups. Univariate analysis identified several baseline parameters significantly associated with response to terlipressin. The study supports continuous terlipressin infusion's superiority in treating type 1 h, with lower adverse event rates and improved patient response.&#x0D; Conclusion: The study concludes that continuous intravenous terlipressin infusion is safer and more effective in treating type 1 h in decompensated cirrhosis patients compared to intravenous boluses. Lower terlipressin dosages were effective in continuous infusion, indicating improved safety. The MELD score was an independent predictor of response, and therapy responsiveness was associated with improved 90 d survival.

Comparison of Norepinephrine &amp; Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management for Septic Shock

Introduction: Sepsis is a clinical syndrome that has physiologic, biologic, and biochemical abnormalities caused by a dysregulated inflammatory response to infection. The present study aimed to estimate the dose of injection of norepinephrine in micrograms/ kg/min after 12 hours of starting the vasopressor infusion to keep an MAP of above 65 mm Hg. Materials &amp; Method: The study was done for the period of two years. Patients who were 18 years and above; who were diagnosed with septic shock during their ICU course and whose relatives gave informed written consent were included in the study. Result: Total of 12 patients were lost during the study period and so in total 100 patients were enrolled for the study. Both the groups were comparable with respect to the MAP (p = 0.655). The norepinephrine dose in group I vs group II at 12 hours was found to be 0.163 ± 0.089 vs 0.396 ± 0.18 μg/kg/min (p &lt;0.001). Reduction in blood lactate concentration in 12 hours was significantly higher in group I [1.479 ± 1.46] than group II [0.08 ± 1.50] mmol/L (p = 0.002). Increase in the urine output of the patients in 12 hours in Group I [0.72 ± 0.44] than group II [0.47 ± 0.460] mL/kg/hour (p = 0.001). Conclusion: A low-dose continuous infusion of terlipressin may have a significant role in ensuring better organ perfusion, preventing renal injury, and improving the SOFA score of the patients when used in adjunct to norepinephrine, early in the management of septic shock.

SAT-543 - Continuous terlipressin infusion improves muscle function but not muscle mass in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

SAT-543 - Continuous terlipressin infusion improves muscle function but not muscle mass in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Comparison of intravenous terlipressin infusion versus bolus in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure-acute kidney injury - an open label RCT.

Despite having ample literature in hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) in decompensated cirrhosis patients, there is a scarcity of data on acute-on-chronic liver failure-acute kidney injury (ACLF-AKI). We compared terlipressin infusion with bolus in ACLF-AKI patients. Patients with ACLF (as per the CANONIC study) were screened for AKI as per the 2015 ICA-AKI criteria. If after 48 h of volume expansion with albumin, serum creatinine (sCr) did not improve, patients were randomized into two groups: Terli-infusion (Terli-I) 2 mg/day and Terli-bolus (Terli-B) 1 mg q6h. If sCr did not decrease < 25% of pretreatment value after 48 h, the terlipressin dose was increased to a maximum of 12 mg/day. The primary outcome was taken as regression (full or partial response), stable/no response and progression of AKI to higher stages and secondary outcomes were taken as 28-day and 90-day mortality. After screening 136 patients with ACLF-AKI, Terli-I (n = 50) and Terli-B (n = 50) with mean sCr 2.4 and 2.1 mg/dl respectively were enrolled. The regression of AKI (full response 37 vs. 27, partial response 3 vs. 9, p = 0.5), stable (2 vs. 5, p = 0.6), progression of AKI (8 vs. 7, p = 0.2) were present in Terli-I and Terli-B respectively. No significant difference was found in 28-and 90-day mortality. In Terli-B, mean terlipressin dose was 8 vs. 4 mg, p < 0.008 with more side effects, 15 vs. 0, p < 0.01 than Terli-I respectively. Terlipressin infusion is more effective than bolus doses in regression of acute kidney injury and better tolerated in acute-on-chronic liver failure-AKI patients.

Efficacy and safety of treatment with terlipressin infusion vs. bolus in gastrointestinal bleeding of variceal origin in a third-level hospital

Efficacy and safety of treatment with terlipressin infusion vs. bolus in gastrointestinal bleeding of variceal origin in a third-level hospital

Comparison of Norepinephrine and Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management of Septic Shock: A Randomized Control Study.

PurposeTo compare norepinephrine and terlipressin vs norepinephrine alone for management of septic shock.Materials and methodsIn this prospective, randomized control trial, 50 adult patients with septic shock were randomized into two groups. Group I received a combination of injection terlipressin 0.02 µg/kg/min (fixed dose) infusion and injection norepinephrine 0.01 µg/kg/min infusion and group II received injection norepinephrine 0.01 µg/kg/min infusion alone. Dose of noradrenaline in both the groups was titrated to achieve the target MAP of 65–70 mm Hg. The data collected were the dose of norepinephrine required to maintain an MAP of above 65 mm Hg, urine output, serum lactate, procalcitonin level, C-reactive protein, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, total duration of vasopressor support, and incidences of the adverse effects.ResultsThe norepinephrine dose in group I vs group II at 12 hours was found to be 0.141 ± 0.067 vs 0.374 ± 0.096 µg/kg/min (p ≤0.005). The serum lactate was lower, and urine output was higher in group I than group II (p <0.05). Group I had a significantly greater reduction in SOFA score in 12 hours than group II. Group I patient also had a significant decrease in the duration of vasopressor administration than group II patients being discharged from the ICU. However, there was no difference in the mortality between the two groups during their ICU stay.ConclusionA low-dose continuous infusion of terlipressin and norepinephrine could help attain early resuscitation goals for managing patients with septic shock.How to cite this articleSahoo P, Kothari N, Goyal S, Sharma A, Bhatia PK. Comparison of Norepinephrine and Terlipressin vs Norepinephrine Alone for Management of Septic Shock: A Randomized Control Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(6):669–675.