Tenotomy Group Research Articles

Treatment of Concomitant SLAP Lesion in Patients Aged 45 and Above Who Underwent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Tenotomy versus Labral Repair?

Background: The current study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the long-head biceps tendon (LHBT) tenotomy or labrum repair for the biceps-labral complex in the presence of superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesion accompanying Goutallier type 0-I-II rotator cuff injury in patients aged 45 and above who underwent arthroscopic repair. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1148 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery. A total of 223 patients, who underwent arthroscopic repair for Goutallier type 0, I, and II rotator cuff tears (RCT) and received simultaneous treatment for SLAP lesions through either LHBT tenotomy or labral repair, were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment of SLAP lesions such as tenotomy (n=78) and repair (n=145). Demographic data, pre-operative, post-operative 3-month, and 12-month range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), and Constant Murley Scale (CMS) were compared. Results: Flexion and external rotation were significantly higher in the tenotomy group, and internal rotation in the repair group (p<0.001, <0.001, 0.005, respectively). Although the VAS score was significantly lower in the tenotomy group compared to the repair group in the 3rd-month postoperative control (p<0.001), the difference between the two groups disappeared in the 12th-month control (p=0.081). The CMS score was low in the tenotomy group preoperatively (p=0.015), by the 12-month follow-up, although there was a severe increase in both groups, there was no statistically significant difference between them (p=0.071). Conclusion: The study determined that both LHBT tenotomy and labral repair treatments for SLAP lesions, performed in conjunction with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, are successful methods in terms of function, pain, and range of motion changes. It was observed that flexion and external rotation outcomes were better in tenotomy patients, while internal rotation was more favorable in patients undergoing labral repair.

Modified arthroscopic tenotomy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis for refractory lateral epicondylitis: a cohort study

Different arthroscopic techniques exist for managing the exterior carpi radials brevis (ECRB) when treating refractory lateral epicondylitis. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of a standard arthroscopic débridement with ECRB tendon release to an arthroscopic ECRB tenotomy distal to its insertion without débridement using a retrospective cohort study design. This study included patients underwent arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis during 2 different time periods: 2016 to 2019 (débridement) and 2019 to 2021 (modified tenotomy without débridement). Patients were assessed preoperatively and at the last follow-up with mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) of pain. A total of 69 patients completed the follow-up (38 in the débridement group and 31 in the tenotomy group). Patients in both groups showed significant improvements were found in MEPS, DASH, and VAS after surgery. Patients in the tenotomy group had higher MEPSs and reported less pain with a minimum 2 year follow-up after surgery. DASH scores between groups were similar at all time periods. Arthroscopic modified tenotomy of the ECRB without débridement improves function and pain significantly for patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis, which is not inferior to arthroscopic débridement technique.

Added value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy over hydrodissection and physiotherapy in chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

There is no consensus on the most suitable non-surgical treatment of chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy. The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the size of effect of ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy. Three intervention arms were formed: 1) percutaneous needle tenotomy, hydrodissection, and physiotherapy; 2) hydrodissection and physiotherapy; and 3) physiotherapy alone. Patients with chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy were randomized. Clinical endpoints included multiple questionnaires after three months: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain at rest and during activity, and EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). Thirty patients were included of 128 screened. The QuickDASH score improved in the percutaneous needle tenotomy and physiotherapy group, but not in the hydrodissection group. The NRS pain at rest and during activity improved more in the percutaneous needle tenotomy (resp. -2 and -2) and hydrodissection (resp. -3 and -3) groups than in the physiotherapy (resp. +1 and -1) group. The EQ-5D-5L improved similarly in all groups. Patients receiving percutaneous needle tenotomy and/or hydrodissection may show better results in terms of pain but not in their functional outcomes compared to those who received physiotherapy alone. The size of effect, however, is small, so a large sample size is needed for a future randomized controlled trial to further investigate these results.

The Effects of Tibialis Anterior Tenotomy on Wound Problems after Anterior Fusion Plating for Severe Ankle Arthritis

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Because nonunion is known to be a relatively common complication following ankle arthrodesis, various fixation techniques have been introduced to enhance the stability and to improve fusion rate. With the use of anterior plate supplementation, postoperative wound problems have been frequently reported despite better fusion rate. This study was performed to determine the effects of tibialis anterior(TA) tenotomy on wound complications and functional outcomes after anterior fusion plating for severe ankle arthritis. Methods: Forty-six patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis using anterior fusion plate were followed for more than 3 years. TA tenotomy was performed prior to wound closure in all patients. As a control group, thirty-eight patients who underwent arthrodesis without TA tenotomy were analysed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale(AOS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure(FAAM). Wound complication rate, time to fusion, fusion rate, time to pain relief below 3 points in visual analog scale were evaluated. Results: Mean AOS and FAAM scores significantly improved to 32.6 and 69.4 points at final followup, respectively. As compared to control group (33.8 and 67.7 points), there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. As postoperative wound complications, there were 1 case of wound dehiscence and 1 case of superficial wound infection. TA tenotomy group showed lower wound complication rate (4.3%) than control group (21.1%). While there were no significant differences in fusion rate, time to fusion, and time to pain relief between both groups, control group needed higher rate of implant removal. Conclusion: Ankle arthrodesis using anterior fusion plate in conjuction with TA tenotomy appears to be an effective surgical option for end-stage ankle arthritis, with higher fusion rate and less wound complication rate. Although there was no specific functional deficit related to a loss of the TA tendon, further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of the TA tenotomy in patients with a fused ankle.

Modified arthroscopic intra-articular transtendinous looped biceps tenodesis leads to satisfactory functional outcomes and less frequent Popeye deformity compared to biceps tenotomy

PurposeThe present study aimed to propose a modified intra-articular transtendinous looped biceps tenodesis (mTLBT) using a suture anchor and to compare the functional outcomes and incidence of Popeye deformities between biceps tenotomy and mTLBT.MethodsMedical records of patients who underwent either tenotomy or mTLBT for the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) lesion between January 2016 and April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 40–70 years with LHBT pathologies, such as superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions > type II, LHBT pulley system rupture with bicipital instability, and intra-articular LHBT tear. The exclusion criteria were full-thickness supraspinatus tears, frozen shoulder, shoulder fracture, and postoperative traumatic events that affected the operated shoulder. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Popeye deformity, bicipital cramping pain, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and functional outcome scores (University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] scores) were recorded. Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square test were used for categorical variables, whereas the Mann–Whitney U test was used for nonparametric variables.ResultsThe mTLBT and tenotomy groups included 15 and 40 patients, respectively. The incidence of Popeye deformity and biceps cramping pain in the tenotomy group (52.5% and 50%, respectively) was significantly higher than that in the mTLBT group (13.3% and 20%, respectively) (p = 0.009 and p = 0.045, respectively). The postoperative VAS, UCLA, and ASES scores were not significantly different between the two groups. One patient in the tenodesis group experienced metallic-anchor pullout.ConclusionmTLBT is an arthroscopic intra-articular top of the groove tenodesis that can be performed completely in the intra-articular space and is especially suitable for patients with an intact or partially torn rotator cuff. This technique is reliable for treating biceps pathologies as it results in similar functional outcome scores, lesser biceps cramping pain, and less frequent Popeye deformity compared to biceps tenotomy.Level of EvidenceIII.

Poster 196: Comparable Short and Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes between Subacromial Balloon Spacer Implantation and Partial Rotator Cuff Repair with Concomitant Biceps Tenotomy versus Tenodesis

Objectives: While short and mid-term clinical outcomes following implantation of an arthroscopic subacromial balloon spacer for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) have been favorable [1], little is known about the effects of concomitant procedures on clinical outcomes and early post- operative recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of concomitant proximal biceps surgery on short and mid-term outcomes following partial rotator cuff repair or subacromial balloon spacer implantation using the InSpace? device (Stryker; Kalamazoo, MI; Figure 1). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a previously published randomized, clinical trial comparing the InSpace? device to partial rotator cuff repair in the management of symptomatic MIRCTs (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02493660) [1]. Study participants with posterosuperior MIRCTs (as defined by MRI diagnosis of ≥2 tendon involvement and ≥5 cm of retraction from the tendon insertion) treated operatively with subacromial balloon spacer implantation or partial rotator cuff repair and concomitant biceps tenotomy or tenodesis were considered for this study. The primary outcome in this study was the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the American Shoulder and Elbow (ASES) score at 6 weeks and 24 months postoperatively. Established MCID and SCB thresholds from the literature were used, requiring a ≥11.1-point increase in ASES score for MCID achievement and a ≥17.5-point increase for SCB achievement [2]. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare MCID and SCB achievement rates between groups. Results: A total of 103 patients were included in this analysis, of which 48 patients were in the InSpace? cohort and 55 were in the partial rotator cuff repair cohort (Table 1). At 6 weeks post-operatively, a larger percentage of patients who received InSpace? with concomitant biceps tenotomy achieved MCID on ASES compared to those receiving a concomitant tenodesis, though this result was not statistically significant (64.3% vs 42.1%, p = 0.15) (Table 1). Similarly, a larger percentage of patients who underwent arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with biceps tenotomy achieved MCID on ASES compared to those undergoing partial repair with biceps tenodesis, though this was not statistically significant (56.3% vs 40.9%, p = 0.41). Similar trends were seen for SCB achievement rates at 6 weeks (Table 2). Notably, SCB achievement rates were significantly greater for patients undergoing InSpace? with biceps tenotomy versus partial repair with biceps tenodesis (p = 0.04). At 24 months, ASES MCID achievement rates for the InSpace? with biceps tenotomy group were similar to the InSpace? with biceps tenodesis group (96.2% vs 86.7%, p = 0.54) (Table 1). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the partial repair with concomitant tenodesis and tenotomy groups (100% vs 92.9%, p = 0.51). Similar trends were seen for SCB achievement rates at this time point (Table 2). Notably, there was no longer a significant difference in SCB achievement rates between the InSpace? with biceps tenotomy group and partial repair with biceps tenodesis group (p = 1.00). Conclusions: The primary goal of treatment during arthroscopic implantation of a subacromial balloon spacer is pain relief in the setting of relatively well-maintained function. Although all patients in this study received standardized post-operative rehabilitation, including 4-week sling use, our results suggest that providers seeking accelerated rehabilitation for their patients may consider concomitant biceps tenotomy for biceps pathology to avoid prolonged immobilization, decrease risk of stiffness, and provide earlier achievement of clinically significant outcomes on patient-reported outcome measures. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

The effect of biceps tenotomy on superior humeral migration in arthroscopic repaired full-thickness supraspinatus tears

Lesions of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are a prevalent injury that frequently coexists with rotator cuff injuries. This study aimed to assess the effect of supraspinatus (SST) repair with concurrent LHB tenotomy on superior migration of the humeral head. The acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was determined via ultrasound to evaluate the superior migration of the humeral head. The study population was retrospectively recruited from patients who underwent unilateral arthroscopic repair of isolated degenerative full-thickness SST tears between January 2017 and December 2019. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on whether they underwent LHB tenotomies during arthroscopy. While 37 patients underwent arthroscopic single-row SST repair, the other 33 patients underwent arthroscopic single-row SST repair with LHB tenotomy. The subject group consisted of people who had undergone arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Contralateral shoulders without rotator cuff injuries were included in the control group. The AHD and SST thicknesses of patients were examined via the ultrasound in both groups and subgroups. The mean age in the SST repair group was 55.52±4.58 years (range, 46-63 years), whereas it was 58.24±3.98 (range, 52-73 years) in the SST repair+LHB tenotomy group. In the SST repair group, 57.6% of patients were female and 42.4% were male, whereas 56.8% and 43.2% were in the SST repair+LHB tenotomy group, respectively. The mean body mass index was 28.06±1.31 kg/m2 (range, 25.7-31.2 kg/m2) in the SST repair group and 28.95±1.79 kg/m2 in the SST repair+LHB tenotomy group. Groups were not different for sex, surgery side, dominant side, tear size, and follow-up time; however, the SST repair+LHB tenotomy group had significantly higher mean age and body mass index than the SST repaired group. The mean AHD value and SST thickness were significantly less in both the rotator cuff repair group and the rotator cuff repair+LHB tenotomy group compared to the healthy shoulder. The mean AHD value was significantly lower in the SST repaired+LHB tenotomy group than in the SST repair group (P=.02). The AHD was narrowed in patients who underwent LHB tenotomy and radiologically demonstrated the depressor effect of the LHB tendon on the humeral head. As a secondary outcome, we demonstrated that regardless of tenotomy, AHD could not be restored in patients who underwent arthroscopic single-row SST repair.

Does the timing of tenotomy during biceps tenodesis affect the incidence of Popeye deformity and clinical outcome? An analysis of short-term follow-up of 2 techniques.

There are multiple techniques that attempt to maintain anatomic length-tension relationship during biceps tenodesis. However, no direct comparison has been performed with respect to the timing of biceps tenotomy during biceps tenodesis. This study aims to assess the incidence of Popeye deformity and clinical outcomes of 2 all-arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis based on timing of the biceps tenotomy. A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with concomitant rotator cuff tears were enrolled from 2019 to 2021. Biceps tenodesis performed after tenotomy formed the first cohort (group 1). The other cohort had biceps tenodesis performed prior to biceps tenotomy (group 2). Postoperative anterior arm pain, biceps muscle spasms, and patient perceptions of the appearance of the bicep muscle were assessed. In addition, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at 3 months and minimum 6 months postoperatively. A total of 71 patients were eligible for participation and 62 patients (53% female, age 58.7±9.0 years) were enrolled (n=33 in group 1, and n=29 in group 2). There were no differences between groups with respect to gender, age, and laterality of biceps tenodesis, as well as type and size of rotator cuff repair. At 3-month follow-up, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical health summary scores were significantly improved in group 2 (44.8±9.7) compared with group 1 (34.1±3.4) (P=.03). In addition, patients in group 2 experienced significantly less pain in their anterior arm than patients in group 1 (19% vs. 33%, P=.02). There were no differences in biceps muscle spasm (3.4% vs. 5.2%, P=.21) and no other differences in PROs between groups. Final follow-up averaged 11.6±3.3 months in group 1 and 11.8±5.5 months in group 2. There were no significant differences in patient-perceived biceps Popeye deformity between group 1 (12.1%) and group 2 (0%) (P=.652). Furthermore, there were no differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS 10) physical health, PROMIS 10 depression, VR-12 physical health summary, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores between the 2 technique groups. Patients with tenotomy performed after tenodesis had better VR-12 physical health summary scores and less arm pain than patients with tenotomy performed before tenodesis at 3-month follow-up. However, there were no differences in any outcome at final follow-up of nearly 1-year. In addition, there were no differences in perceived Popeye deformity between groups at any time period.

Ultrasound-determined healing rates with subscapularis tenotomy versus peel after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Several techniques have been described for mobilizing the subscapularis tendon in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to compare subscapularis tendon healing rates, as determined by ultrasound, in patients following anatomic TSA with either a subscapularis tenotomy or subscapularis peel. This study was a secondary analysis of patients from a previous randomized controlled trial in which patients underwent anatomic TSA and were randomized to either a tenotomy or peel approach. The primary outcome was postoperative tendon healing rates determined on ultrasound at >12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative tendon thickness measured on ultrasound; elbow position (neutral alignment in the belly-press position vs. posterior); internal rotation function measured with the third and fourth questions of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire; and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index. Radiographs were analyzed in patients with torn tendons. One hundred patients were randomized to a tenotomy (n=47) or peel (n=53) approach. Postoperative ultrasound results were available in 88 patients. Tendon healing rates were 95% for tenotomy vs. 75% for peel (P=.011). The mean postoperative tendon thickness was 4 mm (standard deviation, 1.0 mm) and 4 mm (standard deviation, 1 mm) in the tenotomy and peel groups, respectively (P=.37). Internal rotation function was not associated with healing status (P=.77 and P=.22 for questions 3 and 4, respectively, of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire), nor was elbow position (P=.2) in the belly-press position. We observed that subscapularis tenotomy had a higher healing rate than peel as determined by ultrasound in TSA patients. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative tendon thickness in intact tendons as measured on ultrasound when comparing subscapularis mobilization techniques, nor was there any association between healing status and internal rotation function or elbow position.

The effect of biceps tenotomy on humeral migration and clinical outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of biceps tenotomy on humeral migration and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent arthroscopic RC repair. Patients were divided into two groups, whether they underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy or not. The group underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy, tenotomy ( +), or not, tenotomy (-). Clinical and functional outcomes were performed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scoring system.Radiological evaluation was performed in X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), measuring the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), humeral migration (HM) and upper migration index (UMI).ResultsThere was no significant difference between the groups in terms of patient characteristics. The follow-up period was 30.9 ± 8.7 months in the tenotomy ( +) group and 34.9 ± 8.2 months in the tenotomy (-) group with no significant difference. Postoperative ASES score improved significantly in the tenotomy ( +) group compared to the tenotomy (-) group (91.2 ± 4.7, 80.8 ± 18.7, respectively, p = 0.005). There was a significant difference in postoperative AHD, HM and UMI values (MRI; p = 0.003, p = 0.017, p = 0.025; X-ray; p = 0.049, p = 0.002, p = 0.010, respectively). The post–pre difference increase of AHD [MRI for tenotomy( +): 0.14 ± 0.86 and tenotomy(-): 0.91 ± 0.85, p = 0.001; X-ray for tenotomy( +): 0.61 ± 0.43 and tenotomy(-): 1.12 ± 0.7, p = 0.001] and UMI [MRI for tenotomy( +): 0.005 ± 0.05 and tenotomy(-): 0.04 ± 0.06, p = 0.006; X-ray for tenotomy( +): 0.01 ± .064 and tenotomy(-): 0.12 ± 0.37, p = 0.110] values were higher in the tenotomy (-) group compared to the tenotomy ( +) group while HM values decreased more in the tenotomy (-) group. [MRI for tenotomy ( +): -0.19 ± 1.07 and tenotomy (-): -0.79 ± 1.52, p = 0.079; X-ray for tenotomy ( +): -0.27 ± 0.54 and tenotomy (-): -1.006 ± 1.83, p = 0.040].ConclusionAfter short-term follow-up, the humeral head was positioned higher in patients who underwent LHBT tenotomy compared to patients without tenotomy. However, it seems to affect clinical outcomes during this period positively.Level of EvidenceLevel 3

Is biceps tenodesis necessary when performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients older than 55 years?

In patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, tenotomy and tenodesis are the most performed surgical procedures for the biceps long head (BLH) pathologies. Controversy continues as to which surgical procedure provides better results. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of tenotomy and tenodesis applied to the biceps long head in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In our study, the clinical results of 706 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tenotomy or tenodesis on the long biceps head were evaluated retrospectively. Rotator cuff repair patients were divided into two groups as single-row and double-row repair patients. The clinical results of patients who underwent tenotomy and tenodesis in single-row (n = 383) and double-row (n = 323) repair groups were compared. The clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent tenotomy and tenodesis without distinction between double/single-row repair were also compared. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations of the patients were made with Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and visual pain scale (VAS). The presence of the Popeye sign in the arm, tenderness in the bicipital groove, and cramping in the biceps muscle in the postoperative period was evaluated and compared among groups. Preoperative and postoperative clinical results of the patients were compared within the groups. A total of 706 patients with a mean age of 61.78 ± 20.94years and a mean follow-up period of 29.15 ± 14.28months were evaluated. The mean age of the tenodesis group (58.13 ± 8.47) was significantly lower than the tenotomy group (61.52 ± 22.58) (p < 0.05). The mean CSS and VAS mean postoperatively in the tenotomy group (n = 587) were 76.84 ± 12.74 and 2.29 ± 2.78. The postoperative mean CSS and VAS in the tenodesis group (n = 119) were 77.56 ± 11.23 and 2.64 ± 2.70. There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative clinical scores of patients who underwent tenotomy and patients who underwent tenodesis (p > 0.05). There was no difference between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups regarding Popeye deformity (p = 0.980). Bicipital groove tenderness and cramping in the biceps muscle were significantly higher in the tenodesis group (p < 0.001, < 0.001). Tenodesis was performed in 68, and tenotomy was performed in 315 out of 383 patients who underwent single-row rotator cuff repair. Tenodesis was performed in 51, and tenotomy was performed in 272 of 334 patients who underwent double-row rotator cuff repair. When singe versus double-row groups was compared, there was no significant difference in VAS, CSS, Popeye sing, bicipital groove tenderness, or biceps muscle cramping. When tenotomy versus tenodesis was compared within single- and double-row repair groups, there was no significant difference in VAS or CSS. There was no difference between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups regarding Popeye deformity, but bicipital groove tenderness and muscle cramping were more in tenodesis groups regardless of the repair rows. The effect of tenodesis versus tenotomy for BHL pathologies in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was not significant for clinical scores, but bicipital groove tenderness and biceps muscle cramping were significantly higher in the tenodesis group.

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of chronic rupture, arthroscopic tenotomy and tenodesis of proximal biceps tendon

Biceps tendon disorders are substantial cause of intense shoulder pain, and thus they require a careful medical attention. We compared the clinical outcomes of chronic rupture, tenotomy and tenodesis of proximal biceps tendon of patients underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We included 98 patients over 50 years-old who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears and grouped as tenotomy, tenodesis and chronic rupture of biceps tendon. Preoperative and postoperative 24-months follow-up Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and the University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Scale scores were compared. Chronic biceps rupture was the most common pathology in massive rotator cuff rupture group (75.9%). As tenotomy, tenodesis and chronic rupture groups were compared in terms of VAS and UCLA score improvements (preoperative and postoperative change); tenotomy showed better outcomes and there was a statistically significant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis groups in terms of improvements in VAS and UCLA scores (p = 0.036, p = 0.010, respectively). No statistically significant difference between chronic rupture and tenodesis in terms of VAS and UCLA scores improvements were observed (p = 1.000, p = 0.250, respectively). Also, tenotomy showed superior VAS score improvement than chronic tendon rupture (p=0.024) however no statistically significant difference was observed in UCLA score improvement between tenotomy and chronic rupture (p = 0.527). According to our study, tenotomy seems to be a more appropriate surgical method than tenodesis in massive and full-thickness rotator cuff tears with severe biceps tendon degeneration, and also it is not necessary to perform tenodesis in cases with chronic biceps rupture.

The Effects of Tibialis Anterior Tenotomy on Wound Complications and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Fusion Plating for Severe Ankle Arthritis

Nonunion is known to be a relatively common complication following ankle arthrodesis. Various fixation techniques have been introduced to enhance the stability and to improve fusion rate. With the use of anterior plate supplementation, postoperative wound problems have been frequently reported despite better fusion rate. This study was performed to determine the effects of tibialis anterior (TA) tenotomy on wound complications and functional outcomes after anterior fusion plating for severe ankle arthritis. Forty-six patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis using anterior fusion plate were followed for more than 2 years. TA tenotomy was performed prior to wound closure in all patients. As a control group, 38 patients who underwent arthrodesis without TA tenotomy were analyzed. Functional outcomes were evaluated with Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Wound complication rate, time to fusion, fusion rate, time to pain relief were evaluated. Mean Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure scores significantly improved to 32.6 and 69.4 points at final follow-up, respectively. As compared to control group (33.8 and 67.7 points), there were no significant differences in functional outcomes. As postoperative wound complications, there were 1 case of wound dehiscence and 1 case of superficial wound infection. TA tenotomy group showed a significantly lower wound complication rate (4.3%) than control group (23.7%) (p < .001). While there were no significant differences in fusion rate, time to fusion, and time to pain relief between both groups, control group needed higher rate of implant removal. Ankle arthrodesis using anterior fusion plate in conjunction with TA tenotomy appears to be an effective surgical option for end-stage ankle arthritis, with excellent fusion rate and less wound complication rate. Although there were no specific functional deficits related to absence of TA tendon, further studies are needed to determine long-term effects of TA tenotomy in patients with a fused ankle.

There is No Difference in Return to Duty Following the Latarjet With Subscapularis Split Versus Tenotomy Technique in the Military Population

PurposeTo evaluate the return to duty rates between subscapularis split versus subscapularis tenotomy approach to the Latarjet procedure in an active-duty military population.MethodsA total of 46 patients were identified. Thirty-six (87.8%) were able to be contacted and included in the study. Operative technique, time to return to duty, and postoperative range of motion were collected. Patients were contacted telephonically to collect information on recurrent dislocation and time to pass first physical fitness test postoperatively. The primary outcome was time to return to full-duty status designated by passing a Physical Fitness Test. Secondary outcomes were redislocations and final range of motion.ResultsIn total, 36 of 41 (87.8%) patients were able to be contacted. There was no difference in return to duty rates designated by completion of first Physical Fitness Test for both groups (P = .23). In the subscapularis split group, 22 of 23 patients returned to full-duty at an average of 8.0 months versus the tenotomy group, with 12 of 13 patients returned to full-duty at an average of 8.7 months. There was also no difference with re-dislocation incidence for both groups of 0.08 (P = .45). Both groups had one patient each who was unable to return to full duty. There were no differences in postoperative forward flexion and external rotation, but abduction was 9° higher in the split compared to the tenotomy group (P = .03).ConclusionsIn the military patient with anterior glenohumeral instability, the Latarjet using the subscapularis split and subscapularis tenotomy approach demonstrate similar return to duty rates and similar duration to pass a standardized fitness assessment. There was no clinically significant difference in postoperative range of motion. Both approaches produce similar results clinically; and should be chosen based on surgeon preference.Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective cohort study.

Improvement in long head of biceps function and lower rate of biceps deformities after subpectoral tenodesis with cortical button and interference screw vs. arthroscopic tenotomy: a 4-year follow-up.

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate clinical, cosmetic, and strength midterm outcomes in arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and subpectoral biceps tenodesis using bicortical endobutton and interference screw.MethodsIn this retrospective study, inclusion criteria were long head of the biceps (LHB) pathologies treated either with tenotomy or an additional tenodesis. Postoperative assessment included Long Head of Biceps Score (LHBS), age-adjusted Constant-Murley Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value. Elbow flexion and forearm supination strength were measured. The presence of Popeye sign, cramps, and tenderness over the bicipital grove was evaluated. Statistical analysis of continuous variables without normal distribution was performed using Mann-Whitney U test. Grouped analysis was performed using 2-way analysis of variance. Binominal data were analyzed using chi-square test.ResultsA total of 73 patients with a mean age of 63.1 ± 9.6 years and a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 0.5 years were included. Tenotomy was performed in 34 and tenodesis in 39 patients. Tenodesis group displayed a significantly higher LHB score (P = .0006), but no significant differences were detected for the age-adjusted Constant-Murley Score and Subjective Shoulder Value. Tenodesis group showed a significantly lower rate of Popeye deformities (P = .0007) and tenderness over the bicipital groove (P = .004). Patients from the tenotomy group with biceps deformity showed a significantly higher mean contralateral supination strength (P = .002) but no significant difference in contralateral elbow flexion compared with patients without biceps deformity. There was one (1.4%) complication in the tenotomy group (postoperative shoulder stiffness).ConclusionBoth techniques resulted in comparable outcome scores on preselected patients, with tenodesis leading to better LHB function. Tenodesis did not improve elbow flexion and forearm supination strength beyond the tenotomy; however, it reduced the frequency of biceps deformities and tenderness over the bicipital groove. Patients with a strong contralateral forearm supination strength could be at risk of developing a biceps deformity after tenotomy.

Tenodesis yields better functional results than tenotomy in long head of the biceps tendon operations\u2014a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is a common disorder affecting muscle function and causing considerable pain for the patient. The literature on the two surgical treatment methods (tenotomy and tenodesis) is controversial; therefore, our aim was to compare the results of these interventions.MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis using the following strategy: (P) patients with LHBT pathology, (I) tenodesis, (C) tenotomy, (O) elbow flexion and forearm supination strength, pain assessed on the ten-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), bicipital cramping pain, Constant, ASES, and SST score, Popeye deformity, and operative time. We included only randomized clinical trials. We searched five databases. During statistical analysis, odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, using the Bayesian method with random effect model.ResultsWe included 11 studies in the systematic review, nine of these were eligible for the meta-analysis, containing data about 572 patients (279 in the tenodesis, 293 in the tenotomy group). Our analysis concluded that tenodesis is more beneficial considering 12-month elbow flexion strength (WMD: 3.67 kg; p = 0.006), 12-month forearm supination strength (WMD: 0.36 kg; p = 0.012), and 24-month Popeye deformity (OR: 0.19; p < 0.001), whereas tenotomy was associated with decreased 3-month pain scores on VAS (WMD: 0.99; p < 0.001). We did not find significant difference among the other outcomes.ConclusionTenodesis yields better results in terms of biceps function and is non-inferior regarding long-term pain, while tenotomy is associated with earlier pain relief.

Comparative analysis of Achilles tendon healing outcomes after open tenotomy versus percutaneous tenotomy: An experimental study in rats.

There is growing interest in conservative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. However, the majority of experimental studies of Achilles tendon have been performed by open tenotomy. More appropriate model of conservative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture is required. We performed an experimental study to evaluate whether outcomes differ between open tenotomy and percutaneous tenotomy of the Achilles tendon in rats. The Achilles tendons of 48 rats were transected. The animals were divided into two groups according to surgical technique: open tenotomy or microscopy-assisted percutaneous tenotomy. After 1, 2, and 4 weeks, functional, biomechanical, and histological analyses were performed. Western blot was performed for quantitative molecular analysis at 1 week. The Achilles functional index was superior in the percutaneous tenotomy group, compared with the open tenotomy group, at 1 week. The cross-sectional area was significantly larger in the percutaneous tenotomy group than in the open tenotomy group at 4 weeks. Relative to the native tendons, load to failure and stiffness yielded comparable results at 2 weeks in the percutaneous tenotomy group and at 4 weeks in the open tenotomy group. The histological score was significantly better in the percutaneous tenotomy group than in the open tenotomy group at 1 week. At 1 week, interleukin-1β expression in the open tenotomy group was higher than in the percutaneous tenotomy group. In summary, Achilles tendon healing was substantially affected by the tenotomy method. We presume that our percutaneous tenotomy method might constitute a useful experimental animal model for conservative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.

Effect of age, gender, and body mass index on incidence and satisfaction of a Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy or tenodesis: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of Popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy vs. tenodesis and evaluate risk factors and subjective and objective outcomes. Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial in which patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery for a long head of the biceps tendon lesion were allocated to undergo tenotomy or tenodesis. The primary outcome measure for this secondary analysis was rate of Popeye deformity at 24 months postoperation as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Those with a deformity indicated their satisfaction with the appearance of their arm on a 10-cm visual analog scale, rated their pain and cramping, and completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Cohen kappa was calculated to measure inter-rater reliability between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of presence or absence of a Popeye deformity. One hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, of which 42 to the tenodesis group and 45 to the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. Based on clinical observation, the odds of a Popeye in the tenotomy group were 4.3 times greater than in the tenodesis group (P = .018) with incidence of 33% (15/45) and 9.5% (4/42), respectively. Surgical technique was the only significant predictor of perceived deformity, with male gender trending toward significance (odds ratio 7.33, 95% confidence interval 0.867-61.906, P = .067). Mean (standard deviation) satisfaction score of those with a deformity regarding appearance of their arm was 7.3 (2.6). Increasing satisfaction was correlated with increasing age (r = 0.640, P = .025), but there was no association with gender (r = -0.155, P = .527) or body mass index (r = -0.221, P = .057). Differences in subjective outcomes were dependent on whether the Popeye was clinician- or self-assessed. The odds of developing a perceived Popeye deformity was 4.3 higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis based on clinician observation. Male gender was trending toward being predictive of having a deformity. Pain and cramping were increased in those with a self-reported Popeye. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger male patients to minimize the risk of Popeye and the risk of dissatisfaction in the appearance of their arm following surgery.

Effect of Age, Gender, And BMI on the Incidence and Satisfaction of A Popeye Deformity Following Biceps Tenotomy or Tenodesis: Outcomes of A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to 1) determine the rates of popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis 2) identify predictors for developing a deformity, and 3) report the subjective and objective outcomes in patients with a popeye deformity.Methods:Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. Patients 18 years of age or older undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with intraoperative confirmation of a lesion of the long head of the biceps tendon randomized to one of these techniques were included. The primary outcome measure for this sub-study was the rate of a popeye deformity at 24-months post-operative as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Secondary outcomes were presence/absence of a popeye deformity based on patients responding to the following question: “Do you notice a bulge on the front of your upper arm above your elbow?” If yes, patients indicated their satisfaction with the appearance of their arm on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) with 0=“Unsatisfactory” and 10=“Satisfactory” as the anchors. Patients were also asked to indicate if they experienced pain or cramping on a VAS, and complete the American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score (WORC). Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength (ratio of affected and unaffected) were also measured. Kappa was calculated to measure interrater reliability between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity, and logistic regression was used to identify possible predictors of its occurrence. Pearson correlations were performed to identify factors associated with dissatisfaction in appearance.Results:Fifty-seven participants were randomly assigned to each group of which 42 in the tenodesis group and 45 in the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. The overall incidence of popeye deformity based on clinical assessment was 21%, 9.5% (4/42) in the tenodesis group and 33% (15/45) in the tenotomy group. The odds of a popeye deformity resulting from a tenotomy was 4.3 times that of tenodesis (OR 4.3, 95% CI: 1.25-14.76; p=0.018). Gender was tending towards significance with males having 7.3 greater odds of a perceived deformity (p=0.067), while age and BMI were not predictive. There were no differences between those with and without a perceived deformity with respect to subjective and functional outcome measures. Based on patient self-assessment, the overall incidence of a deformity was 18%, 25% in the tenotomy group and 10% in the tenodesis group. The odds of a patient reporting a popeye deformity following tenotomy was 3.66 relative to tenodesis (OR=3.66, CI 95% 1.08-12.44; p=0.038). Gender, BMI, and age were not predictive of self-report of a popeye. Those with and without a self-reported popeye deformity differed with respect to pain (p=0.001), cramping (0.039), and WORC scores (p<0.006), there was no difference in ASES or elbow strength.Of those who reported having a deformity, mean (SD) satisfaction score reported on the appearance of their arm was 7.3 (2.6). Increasing satisfaction score was significantly correlated with increasing patient age (r=0.640; p=0.025) but there was no association with gender or BMI.Inter-rater agreement between clinical assessment and self-reported popeye deformity was substantial with a kappa of 0.635 (p<0.001). However, 8% (7/87) of patients with a popeye deformity did not perceive it and 3% (3/87) of patients reported a popeye deformity that was not detected by the clinical assessor.Conclusions:The odds of observing a popeye deformity based on clinical assessment following tenotomy was 4.3 times higher than tenodesis at 24-months post-operative. Male gender may contribute to increased incidence, while age and BMI were not major contributors to the presence/absence of a popeye. In patients who reported a popeye deformity, increasing age was associated with increased satisfaction in the appearance of the arm.

Biceps tenotomy versus soft-tissue tenodesis in females aged 60 years and older with rotator cuff tears

BackgroundRecently, to treat the long head of the biceps tendon lesions in addition to rotator cuff repair has been recommended. However, the differences in clinical outcomes between biceps tenotomy and tenodesis for middle-aged and elderly females remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of biceps tenotomy and soft-tissue tenodesis that were performed concurrently with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in ≥60-year-old females. MethodsFemale shoulders that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our institute in 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. This study included 66 shoulders with concurrent biceps tenotomy or soft-tissue tenodesis: tenotomy group, 41 shoulders; soft-tissue tenodesis group, 25 shoulders. Clinical scores, biceps pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), Popeye deformity, and biceps strength (%contralateral side) were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe mean age was significantly higher in the tenotomy group than the soft-tissue tenodesis group (72 ± 4 and 68 ± 6 years, respectively; P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in post-operative JOA and UCLA scores between the groups. VAS for biceps pain was significantly higher at postoperative 6 months in the tenotomy group than the soft-tissue tenodesis group (2.9 ± 2.5 and 1.7 ± 1.6, respectively, P = 0.03), though there were no significant differences at postoperative 3, 12, and ≥24 months. Subjective evaluation of Popeye deformity was not significantly different between the groups. Postoperative biceps strength was significantly lower in the tenotomy group than the soft-tissue tenodesis group (89.9% and 102.8%, respectively, P = 0.02). ConclusionsBoth biceps tenotomy and soft-tissue tenodesis concurrent with rotator cuff repair in ≥60-year-old female patients resulted in good outcomes. Shoulders with soft-tissue tenodesis demonstrated earlier improvement in postoperative biceps pain and better postoperative biceps strength than those with tenotomy. There were no differences in objective and subjective Popeye deformity between tenotomy and soft-tissue tenodesis. The LHB procedures, tenotomy or tenodesis, can be selected depending on surgeons’ preference.