Ten Group Classification System Research Articles

Stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification system: A cross-sectional registry of 80 663 births from 16 hospital in sub-Saharan Africa.

To assess stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification and the usefulness of this approach for understanding trends. Cross-sectional study. Prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data from 16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. All women aged 13-49 years who gave birth to a live or stillborn baby weighting >1000 g between July 2021 and December 2022. We compared stillbirth risk by Robson ten-group classification, and across countries, and calculated proportional contributions to mortality. Stillbirth mortality, defined as antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths. We included 80 663 babies born to 78 085 women; 3107 were stillborn. Stillbirth mortality by country were: 7.3% (Benin), 1.9% (Malawi), 1.6% (Tanzania) and 4.9% (Uganda). The largest contributor to stillbirths was Robson group 10 (preterm birth, 28.2%) followed by Robson group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour, 25.0%). The risk of dying was highest in births complicated by malpresentations, such as nullipara breech (11.0%), multipara breech (16.7%) and transverse/oblique lie (17.9%). Our findings indicate that group 10 (preterm birth) and group 3 (multipara with cephalic term singleton in spontaneous labour) each contribute to a quarter of stillbirth mortality. High mortality risk was observed in births complicated by malpresentation, such as transverse lie or breech. The high mortality share of group 3 is unexpected, demanding case-by-case investigation. The high mortality rate observed for Robson groups 6-10 hints for a need to intensify actions to improve labour management, and the categorisation may support the regular review of labour progress.

Analysis of caesarean delivery rates using Robson ten group classification system in North West Amhara referral hospitals, Ethiopia, 2022: A cross-sectional study

IntroductionThe cesarean delivery rate has been consistently rising over time and differs among different hospitals. In order to understand the specific factors contributing to this rapid increase beyond the recommended levels, it is necessary to continuously monitor and evaluate cesarean deliveries using the Robson ten-group classification system. Consequently, the objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of cesarean deliveries within each group by employing the Robson ten-group classification system. MethodA cross-sectional study design was conducted in referral hospitals in the North West Amhara region, involving 721 mothers who gave birth between January and February 2022. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Data collection involved an interviewer-administered, pretested, semi-structured questionnaire, as well as a review of medical charts. The women were allocated into one of the ten Robson groups. The proportion of each group, the contribution of each group to the total caesarean delivery rate, and the caesarean delivery rate within each group were all calculated. ResultThe overall caesarean delivery rate was 277 (38.3 %). The primary factors contributing to the overall cesarean delivery rate were found to be group 1 (23.9 %), group 5 (21 %), group 3 (11.6 %), and group 10 (11%). The most common indication for caesarean delivery included an abnormal fetal heart rate pattern, the presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid, a history of previous cesarean delivery, fetal-pelvic disproportion, and breech presentation. ConclusionGroup 1, 5, 3, and 10 emerged as the major contributor to the overall cesarean delivery rate. Interestingly, this study also unveiled a significant prevalence of cesarean delivery among low-risk groups. These specific groups warrant further investigation to identify potential factors that can be modified and implement targeted interventions to decrease the cesarean delivery rate. It is crucial to evaluate existing management protocols in the study area.

Errors in the classification of pregnant women according to Robson ten-group classification system

ObjectivesThe Robson Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) is widely used as a classification system for perinatal analyses such as Caesarean section (CS) rates. In Germany, standardised data sets on deliveries are classified by quality assurance institutions using the TGCS. This observational study aims to evaluate potential errors in the TCGS classification of deliveries. Study designManual TGCS classification of all 1370 deliveries in an obstetric unit in 2018 and comparison with semi-automatic TGCS classifications of the quality assurance institution. ResultsIn the manual classification, 259 out of 1370 births (18.9 %) were assigned to a different Robson group than in the semi-automatic classification. The proportions of births by Robson group were significantly different in TGCS group 1 (32.2 % vs. 37.6 %, p = 0.0034) and group 2 (18.4 % vs. 14.4 %, p = 0.0053). Concordance between manual and semi-automatic classifications ranged from 59.5 % in group 2 to 100.0 % in groups 6, 7, 8, and 9. The most frequent mismatches were for the parameters “onset of labour” in 184 cases (13.4 %), “parity” in 42 cases (3.1 %) and “previous uterine scars” in 23 cases (1.7 %). In the manual classification, there were significant differences in the CS rate in group 1 (7.9 % vs. 2.5 %, p < 0.0001), group 2 (30.2 % vs. 48.2 %, p < 0.0001), and group 4 (14.1 % vs. 37.4 %, p = 0.0004), compared to the semi-automatic classification. ConclusionsDue to incorrect data entry and unclear definitions of criteria, quality assurance data in obstetric databases may contain a relevant proportion of errors, which could influence statistics with TGCS in context of CS rates in international comparisons.

Analysis of Cesarean section rates using Robson’s ten-group classification system in comparison with the MCS population reference

Abstract Background: The escalating global prevalence of Cesarean section (CS) deliveries raises concerns. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests employing Robson’s ten-group classification system (RTGCS) for assessing and comparing CS rates among obstetric units. The aim of our study was to assess our hospital’s CS rate per group and juxtapose it with WHO Multi-Country Survey (MCS) population reference data. Furthermore, we delve into prevalent obstetric Indications for CS and examine potential strategies for mitigating the high CS rate. Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study occurred at an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital from October 2018 to May 2020. Women delivering during this period were classified based on RTGCS, and Cesarean rates were computed across various groups. These rates were then compared with the WHO’s MCS population reference guidelines. Additionally, we investigated obstetric Indications for CS within these groups. Results: Of 2994 deliveries during the study period, 42.55% were CS. Notably, group 5 (29.75%) and group 1 (21.74%) had the highest CS rates. The CS rate of nulliparous women was 40.9%. Primary CS groups frequently cited fetal distress as the reason, while group 5 showed repeat CS due to previous CS with obstetric complications, on-demand CS, and scar integrity concerns. Conclusion: Despite our hospital’s overall high CS rate, group-specific contributions align with existing research. High-risk pregnancies, previous CS cases, and preterm CS for neonatal care notably contribute. Efforts should target in reducing CS in low-risk groups.

Using Robson classification to analyze cesarean section and induction rates in relation to changes in the standards of perinatal care in one hospital in Poland.

Poland has one of the highest cesarean birth (CB) rates in Europe. For this study, we used the Robson Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) to analyze trends in the induction and CB rates in one hospital in Poland over a period of 11 years. We compare these trends with changes in National Legislative and Medical Guidelines introduced during this time that were aimed at lowering rates of unnecessary medical interventions. We conducted a retrospective study including all births after 24 weeks' gestation between 2010 and 2020 from one tertiary hospital (n = 66,716 births). After the deletion of records with missing data, 66,678 births were included in the analysis. All births were classified according to the Robson TGCS. The size, CB rate, and contribution of each group for every year were calculated. Linear regression analyses were used to analyze trends over time. The total CB rate varied from 29.6% to 33.0% during the study period, with a linear increase of 0.045 percentage points annually (R2  = 0.021; F(1) = 0.189; p = 0.674). This study was considerably lower than the total CB rate for Poland, which rose from 33.9% in 2010 to 45.1% in 2020, increasing at a rate of 1.13 percentage points per year (R2  = 0.93; F(1) = 61.88; p < 0.001). Induction rates among both nulliparous (R1 + R2) and multiparous (R3 + R4) women at term also increased. Study groups R5 (previous cesarean birth), R2 (nulliparous in induced or prelabor cesarean delivery), and R1 (nulliparous women at term with single cephalic pregnancy in spontaneous labor) were the highest contributors to the overall CB rate. The greatest decrease in the CB rate was detected in group R5b (more than one previous CB). None of the groups showed statistically significant increases in CB rates over the study period. The CB rate in the hospital where the study was conducted was considerably lower than the total CB rate in Poland. When compared with countries with similar CB rates, group R2b (women with nulliparous, prelabor cesarean birth) in our study was considerably larger. More comparisons across different hospital settings in Poland are needed. However, as hospitals are not encouraged to routinely collect the data needed to construct TGCS, such comparisons are very difficult to conduct.

Trends in caesarean section rates in Europe from 2015-2019 using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System: A Euro-Peristat registry study

Abstract Objective To assess changes in caesarean section (CS) in Europe from 2015-2019 and utilise the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) to evaluate the contribution of different obstetric populations to overall CS rates and trends Methods This was an observational study utilising routine population birth data from 28 European countries participating in the Euro-Peristat network. We included all births ≥22 weeks gestational age, from 2015 to 2019. A federated model used individual-level data from routine sources in each country formatted to common data model to generate anonymous, aggregate data tables on yearly CS rates and the Robson TGCS classification. We computed the Robson group-specific relative size, CS rate, relative and absolute contribution to overall CS rate Results Among the 28 European countries, CS rates (2015: 16.0-55.9%; 2019: 16.0-52.2%) and trends varied (-3.7-+4.7%; 9 countries decreasing, 7 stable [ ≤ ±0.2], 12 increasing). Using the Robson Classification (17 countries), in most countries, labour induction increased (Groups 2a, 4a), while multiple pregnancies (Group 8) decreased. In countries with decreasing overall CS rates, CS tended to decrease in most Robson groups, while in countries with increasing overall CS rates, CS tended to increase in most Robson groups. In countries with the greatest increase in CS rates (&amp;gt;1%), absolute contributions of Groups 1 (nulliparous term cephalic singletons, spontaneous labour), 2a and 4a, 2b and 4b (prelabour CS), and 10 (preterm cephalic singletons) to overall CS tended to increase. Conclusions Analysis of the Robson Classification shows varying CS trends and rates across Europe. Comparisons between European countries, particularly those with divergent trends, could provide insight into strategies to reduce CS without indication.

Study of Caesarean Section Births in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mumbai Using Robson Classification System.

Robson ten-group classification system is recommended by WHO (World health organization) as a global standard for assessment and monitoring caesarean section (CS) rates. This classification is simple and robust. It is prospective, easily reproducible and clinically relevant. We conducted a prospective observational study of CS births at a tertiary care institute. Caesarean births in a tertiary care hospital were classified using Robson classification system as recommended by WHO. The study was conducted for period of 6months duration. The ethics committee of the institute approved this study. We enrolled 4771 consecutive women who delivered during this study period. We included patients who had vaginal delivery as well as those who had delivery by CS. Both live births and stillbirths (of at least 500-g birth weight or at least 22weeks gestation (according to WHO recommendations) were included in this study. During this study period, we had 4771 deliveries, out of which 2231 pregnant women (46.76%) were delivered by CS as compared to 2540 vaginal deliveries. Women with previous CS (term with single cephalic pregnancy) were included in Robson group 5. Group 5 had the highest CS rate (13.41%). Robson group 5, 1 and 10 were the largest contributors to the high CS rates at our institute. In our study, 4771 deliveries were conducted during this study period (6months). Out of 4771 deliveries, CS was done in 2231 pregnant women (46.76%). 2540 women had vaginal deliveries. Group 5 (13.41%) which comprised of women with previous CS had the highest CS rate followed by group 1 and group 10. The second largest contribution was from Group 1 with CS rate of 9.01%. Robson Group 1 included nulliparous term women with single cephalic pregnancy in spontaneous labour. Group 10 was the third largest contributor to the overall CS. Group 10 included women who delivered preterm (single cephalic presentation). Group 10 contributed to 8.09% of overall CS rate. We should make every effort to provide CS for women requiring this procedure, rather than work towards achieving a specific rate for CS.

Auditing cesarean section indications in women of Groups 1 to 4 of Robson's Ten-Group Classification System: A descriptive study at a university hospital in Thailand

Aim: To determine the appropriateness of indication for cesarean section in women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation without previous CS irrespective of parity and how labor started (Robson's Ten-Group Classification System [RTGCS] groups 1-4).  Methods: This was a descriptive study assessing medical records of 311 women in RTGCS groups 1- 4, between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2020 who underwent a CS in Srinagarind Hospital, a university hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Appropriateness of CS indications was assessed using criteria developed by our institute. Indications were classified into three categories: cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD), fetal indications, and other maternal indications. Results: The overall appropriate rate of CS indications in RTGCS groups 1-4 was 32.5% (95% CI 26.8% – 38.7%). The appropriate rates of CS indications in RTCGS group 1, 2a, 2b, 3, 4a, and 4b were 43.0% (95% CI 35.2% - 51.2%), 10.6% (95% CI 0.0% - 24.9%), 11.7% (95% CI 0.0% - 25.0%), 50.0% (95% CI 32.1% - 68.6%), 0% (95% CI 0.0% - 100%), and 40.0% (95% CI 20.0% - 74.8%) respectively. Conclusion: Low appropriateness in CS indications in RTGCS groups 1-4 leads to high CS rates. Increasing appropriateness of CS indications in this population will reduce unnecessary CS. Interventions focusing on increasing appropriateness in CS indications are urgently required to achieve appropriate use of CS.  

Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates in a Public Tertiary Hospital During Teaching and Non-teaching Periods Using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.

The rising cesarean section (CS) rate is a global concern. One of the hospital characteristics that may explain the variation in CS among hospitals is hospital teaching status. This study aims to assess the rate of CS in a tertiary hospital during the teaching and non-teaching periods and to conduct an analysis using the Robson ten-group classification system. This study is a retrospective cohort that assessed pregnant mothers who gave birth at a tertiary hospital in Bandar Abbas. The study population was divided into two groups: those who gave birth during the hospital's teaching period (November 1st, 2019 to October 30th, 2020) and those who gave birth after that (November 1st, 2020 to October 30th, 2021). The primary outcome was the rate of CS according to Robson's classification system. The secondary outcome was the contributions of each group of Robson to the overall CS rate. Data were extracted by trained collectors from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)," a valid national system, using electronic patient records. Of the total number of births (8382), 62.9 % occurred during the teaching period and 37.1 % during the non-teaching period. A 7% increase in CS was observed during the teaching period of the hospital compared to the non-teaching period (p<0.01). CS rate in Robson groups 1,2,4,7, and 10 differs significantly between teaching and non-teaching periods. According to the findings, Groups 5, 10, and 2 were the three most significant contributors to overall CS in our hospital during the study period. The efforts to reduce the overall CS rate should be focused on groups 2,5, and 10 of Robson.

An audit of caesarean section in a semi urban hospital in northern cross river state Nigeria utilizing the robson-10 criteria

Introduction: There has been rising rates of caesarean section across the globe and some of their indications are unjustified. This brings to the fore, the need to audit the caesarean section cases done in a resource poor setting like ours, utilizing the World Health Organization (W.H.O) endorsed Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). Objective: To determine the rate of caesarean section and the major contributing groups to this overall rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification System. Materials and Method: This is a retrospective study of 430 women who had caesarean section over a 24 month period. Result: Out of 1402 women that delivered during the study period, 430 of them had caesarean section, giving a caesarean section rate of 30.7%. Using the Robson Ten Group Classification System, group 3 was the major contributor to the overall caesarean section rate with 25.81%. This was followed by groups 1 (18.84%) and 4 (13.95%) respectively. Conclusion: A high caesarean section rate of 30.7% was obtained from our study and group 3 was the major contributor to this caesarean section rate. Constant auditing is encouraged to lower the caesarean section rate.

Comparing Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Hospitals: A Demonstration of the Robson Ten-Group Classification System for Use in Quality Improvement and Benchmarking.

The World Health Organization-endorsed Robson Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) is a standard reporting mechanism for cesarean birth, yet this approach is not widely adopted in the United States. To describe the application and utility of the TGCS to compare hospital-level cesarean births rates, for use in quality improvement and benchmarking. We conducted a descriptive, secondary data analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor dataset using data from 228 438 women's births, from 2002 to 2008, in 12 sites across the United States. We stratified births into 10 mutually exclusive groups and calculated within-group proportions of group size and cesarean birth rates for between-hospital comparisons of cesarean birth, trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), and labor induction utilization. There is variation in use of cesarean birth, labor induction, and TOLAC across the 12 sites. The TGCS provides a method for between-hospital comparisons, particularly for revealing usage patterns of labor induction, TOLAC, and cesarean birth. Adoption of the TGCS in the United States would provide organizations and quality improvement leaders with an effective benchmarking tool to assist in reducing the use of cesarean birth and increasing the support of TOLAC.

Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review.

The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) is rising rapidly. However, it should be carried out only under valid obstetric indications due to the various complications associated with it. Therefore, to record CS incidences, Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) was implemented. This review focuses on the prevalence of CS rates found in various studies and identifies the clinically important groups that were most involved in CS deliveries. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelineswere followed in this review. "Caesarean delivery" OR "Robson's Ten Group" OR "Classification System" were keywords used tosearch literature. Twenty-one studieswere included in this review based on eligibilitycriteria. We concluded that group 5 was the major contributing factor for the increase in CS rates followed by group 10, group 4, group 2, and group 1. Previous CS was the most common factor responsible for increasing CS rates. We emphasize that Robson's TGCS is an essential parameter for recording CS ratesand is simple to use for CS rate comparison.

Variables associated with the Robson Ten-Group Classification System in the State of São Paulo, Brazil

This study evaluated the associations between the groups of the Robson Classification System and maternal sociodemographic characteristics among neonates in São Paulo State, Brazil, 2016. The groups 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 tend to be associated to cesarean delivery and more privileged educational opportunities, while the groups 1, 4 and 3 tend to be associated to vaginal delivery and less privileged educational opportunities. These results reinforce the notion that strategies for reduction of cesarean deliveries should go beyond a biomedical model focused on biological factors, and should also consider the social factors that characterize the living conditions of people.

COVID-19 and Cesarean Section Rates

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 infection on the rate and indications for cesarean section (CS) according to Robson's Ten-Group Classification system. Methodology: Our study was a 6-month retrospective observational study at the Maternal and Child Health Wing where every antenatal woman who was admitted irrespective of gestational age and whether in labor or not was customarily screened for COVID-19 infection. Based on the mode of delivery, all delivered women were classified into two groups: vaginal or cesarean, and the information was then further classified according to Robson's classification. Data collected were analyzed using Excel sheets, and Chi-square test was applied to evaluate if the difference in CS rates was statistically significant. Results: During COVID months, a total number of confinements were 877, among which the cesarean section were 381, contributing to a rate of 43.4%. The total COVID-19-positive confinements during the same period were 68. Group 2 formed the vast majority of CSs, followed by Group 1 and 5. During the post-COVID months, summation of confinements was 1443, among which the CS were 580, thereby contributing to a rate of 40.1%. In contrast to COVID time, Group 5 formed the greatest chunk contributing to CS rate, followed by Group 2 and 1. There was a statistically significant difference among confinements during COVID and post-COVID period and between CS rates among COVID-19 positive and negative women. Conclusion: During the COVID pandemic, there was a decrease in the number of confinement in our hospital. However, the CS rate increased and according to Robson's classification Group 1 and 2 made greatest contribution to CSs due to changed dynamics.

Analysis of Cesarean Section by Robson\'s Ten-group Classification System: A Step toward Reduction in Rate of the Surgery

Analysis of Cesarean Section by Robson\'s Ten-group Classification System: A Step toward Reduction in Rate of the Surgery

Assessment Of Caesarean Section Rate Using Robson Ten Group Classification System In A Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross Sectional Study.

The growing rate of caesarean section is a major concern for quality of maternal life and public health. Concerns about such increases prompted the WHO to recommend Robson ten group classification system for assessing the Caesarean Section rate. The present study's aim was to assess the caesarean rate using Robson's ten group classification system and highlighted the reliable information system, in turn, helps to construct interventions to reduce avoidable caesareans. This cross sectional study was carried out on 5796 women who delivered from 25th November 2021 to 24th November 2022 in Jinnah Post Graduate medical Centre Karachi. Data was collected from the women admitted for delivery using Robson's Pro forma. Relative size and caesarean rate of each group and overall caesarean section rate was calculated. Of the total 5796 deliveries, 2141 (36.9%) were caesarean deliveries and 3655 (63.1%) had normal deliveries. Out of Robson's ten groups system, Group 10 had a higher contribution of 705 (12.2%) to the overall caesarean rate followed by group 5 had 627 (10.8%). The contributing prevalence of Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were 122 (2.1%), 317 (5.5%), 50 (0.87%), 167 (2.9%), 42 (0.72%), 35 (0.6%), 49 (0.85%) and 27 (0.46%) respectively. Our study concluded that Group 10 and 5 were the most responsible for the whole Caesarean Section rate. In all contributing groups, there is a need to identify the indications and to sub classify these groups further so that preventable caesarean sections can be avoided by reducing these factors.

Time trends in caesarean section rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health: a population-based cohort study of 1 153 789 births in Norway

ObjectivesTo study caesarean section (CS) rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health in Norway during 1999–2018.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingMedical Birth Registry of Norway.Participants1 153 789 births and 1 174 066...

An Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery Rates According to Robson Classification in the Black Sea Region of Turkey

To analyse cesarean deliveries (CD) using the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for reducing cesarean rates. Cross-sectional study. Ordu University Medical Faculty Training and Research Hospital, Ordu, Turkey, from 1st January 2008 to 31st December 2020. A total of 29,885 deliveries during the 13-year study period were analysed. Group sizes and annual, overall, absolute, and relative CD rates were calculated to analyse the effect of the Robson groups (RGs)/TGCS. The data were analysed using the two-way Chi-square test and two-proportion Z-test with Bonferroni correction. The overall CD rate was 59.22% (17,697). The principal contributors to the overall CD rate were RG5 (54.48%), RG1 (12.52%), and RG2 (10.06%). The relative CD rate in preterm pregnancies (RG10) increased approximately five-fold over the 13-year study period due to the increase in both group size and absolute CD rate (p<0.001). TGCS shows the cesarean delivery trends in terms of cesarean rates and identifies those groups requiring special precautions. The target groups (RG5, RG1, RG2 and RG10) need more in-depth research to reduce CD rates. Various approaches need to be implemented including individualised cesarean indication, encouragement of vaginal delivery after cesarean delivery, expectant management in nulliparous women, and spontaneous labor for preterms labor. Cesarean section, Elective cesarean section, Induction of labor, Vaginal birth after cesarean section, Robson classification, Preterm deliveries.

Analysis of caesarean section rates according to Robson’s classification at the Municipal Clinical Hospital, Republic of Moldova

Background and aim. The worldwide rise of caesarean section (CS) is a major public health concern and a cause of significant debate due to potential maternal and perinatal risks, cost issues and inequity in access. In the Republic of Moldova, in recent years, the incidence of CS has increased by 7.7% (from 12.08% in 2007 to 20.5% in 2019); however, perinatal mortality rates haven’t changed (10.3‰ in 2007, and 9.7‰ in 2019). In order to understand the factors that determine the increasing trend of CS and to approach new strategies to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections, a standardized tool is needed to assess and compare CS rates. Methodology. A single-center, cross-section study was conducted in the period of January-December 2019. Data were collected from medical charts of women who gave birth in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the “Gheorghe Paladi” Municipal Clinical Hospital, Chişinău, and classified using the ten-group classification system according to Robson, to determine the CS rate in each group, the absolute and relative contribution made by each group to the overall caesarean section rate. Results. A total of 4279 deliveries were analyzed, and of these, 836 (19.5%) cases were delivered by caesarean section. The most representative group of our population was Group 3 (42.4%), followed by Group 1 (32.1%) and Group 5 (7.5%). The greatest contributors to the overall CS rate were Group 5 (33.8%), Group 2 (14.7%) and Group 1 (11.4%). There was also a high rate of pre-labor caesarean sections in Group 2, Group 4 and Group 10. Conclusions. The obtained results indicate that the greatest contributor to CS rate are women with previous caesarean section, followed by nulliparous women with full-term, cephalic pregnancy. An important step in reducing the total CS rate is to focus our efforts on decreasing the caesarean section rate in primary patients. We found that the Robson classification is clinically relevant and it is an effective tool for analyzing the caesarean section rate in our population.

Analysis of cesarean section using Robson’s criteria in tertiary care center

Introduction: This study aims to analyze all the women delivering in our institute according to the Robson’s classification. Robson’s ten group classification system (TGCS) endorsed by WHO, is a global standard tool for assessing, monitoring and comparing cesarean section rates at all levels.&#x0D; Method: This cross sectional study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Patan hospital, Patan academy of health sciences (PAHS), Lalitpur, Nepal over 12 months’ period. All women who delivered during this period were classified according to the Robson’s classification (TGCS) into a specific group. Relative size and overall cesarean section rate of each group were calculated.&#x0D; Result: A total of 4,985 cases were analyzed. The cesarean section rate was 57.7%. Group 1+2 represented nearly half (49%) of the obstetric population served during the study period. Group 2A was found to be the highest contributor (27.4%) followed by Group 5 (22.8%) and Group 1 (13.0%). In terms of indication for cesarean section -Fetal distress and previous cesarean section were found to be the most common indications. Similarly, nulliparous women were three to four times more likely to be delivered by cesarean section when labor was induced.&#x0D; Conclusion: From this study, we can conclude that for an effective reduction in the overall high cesarean section rate in our Institution, we need to focus on a more stringent protocol for inducing labor especially among nulliparous women and to practice evidence based guidelines. Redefining failed induction needs to be considered critically as well.