Ten-core Biopsies Research Articles

The Association Between Age, Prostate Cancer Risk, and Higher Gleason Score in a Long-term Screening Program: Results from the Göteborg-1 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial

BackgroundStudies have suggested associations between greater age, increased risk of prostate cancer (PC), and higher Gleason score. ObjectiveThe present study aimed at investigating these associations within the Göteborg-1 randomized, population-based PC screening trial. Design, setting, and participantsThe screening arm of the Göteborg-1 screening trial comprises 10000 randomly selected men (aged 50–64 yr at randomization) from the Göteborg region of Sweden. Between 1995 and 2014, they were biennially invited to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to an upper age limit of 70 yr (range 67–71 yr). PSA ≥3 ng/ml triggered a prostate biopsy (sextant biopsy 1995–2009, thereafter a ten-core biopsy). Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe impact of age on Gleason score, given a screen-detected PC, was investigated with multinomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for year of testing and screening round. Results and limitationsOverall, 7625 men had at least one PSA test and 1022 men were diagnosed with PC. For men with screen-detected PC, age was associated with the risk of clinically significant PC above and beyond screening round and year of testing (p < 0.001). For each 1-yr increase in age, the risk of being diagnosed with a Gleason score ≥3 + 4 cancer (vs <7) increased by 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7–17), whereas the risk of being diagnosed with a Gleason score ≥4 + 3 cancer (vs <7) increased by 8.5% (95% CI –1.6 to 20). ConclusionsThe increased risk of a higher Gleason score in older men should be considered when counseling men regarding early diagnosis and treatment for PC. Patient summaryWe found that older age increased both the risk of prostate cancer and the risk of more aggressive prostate cancer.

Detection of Prostate Cancer: Comparison of cancer detection rates of Sextant and Extended Ten-core Biopsy Protocols

To compare the cancer detection rates of sextant and ten- core biopsy protocol amongst patients being evaluated for prostate cancer. This is a prospective study involving 125 men with suspicion of prostate cancer. They all had an extended 10-core transrectal digitally-guided prostatic biopsy using Tru-Cut needle. Indications for biopsy were presence of one or more of the following: elevated Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) findings and abnormal prostate scan. Sextant biopsies were collected first, followed by four lateral biopsies in all patients. Both groups of specimen were kept and analyzsed separately by the same pathologist. The cancer detection rates of sextant and extended (combination of sextant and lateral) 10-core biopsy protocols were determined and compared. Pearson's Chi square and McNemar tests at two degrees of freedom with level of significance set at 0.05 ( P <0.005) were used to determine the statistical significance. The overall cancer detection rate of 10-core prostate biopsy was 48.8%. Of all positive biopsies, the sextant biopsy protocol detected 52 cancers (85.2%) while the lateral biopsy protocol detected 58 cases (95.1%). Three (3) cancers were detected by the sextant protocol only while the lateral protocol detected nine (9) cancers where sextant technique was negative for malignancy. Ten-core extended protocol showed a statistically significant increase of 14.8% over the traditional sextant. (P=0.046). The overall complication rate of ten-core biopsy was 26.4% and the procedure was well tolerated in most patients. We conclude that a ten-core prostate biopsy protocol significantly improves cancer detection and should be considered as the optimum biopsy protocol.

Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. In the future, a significant further increase in the incidence of prostate cancer is expected. Therefore, improvement of prostate cancer diagnosis is a main topic of diagnostic imaging. The systematic prostate biopsy ("ten-core biopsy") is now the "gold standard" of prostate cancer diagnosis but may miss prostate cancer. Contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound (US) and elastography are evolving methods that may dramatically change the role of US for prostate cancer diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced colour Doppler US allows for investigations of the prostate blood flow and consequently for prostate cancer visualization and therefore for targeted biopsies. Comparisons between systematic and contrast-enhanced targeted biopsies have shown that the targeted approach detects more cancers and cancers with higher Gleason scores with a reduced number of biopsy cores. Furthermore, elastography, a new US technique for the assessment of tissue elasticity has been demonstrated to be useful for the detection of prostate cancer, and may further improve prostate cancer staging. Therefore, contrast-enhanced colour Doppler US and elastography may have the potential to improve prostate cancer detection, grading and staging. However, further clinical trials will be needed to determine the promise of these new US advances.

Risonanza magnetica della prostata con imaging spettroscopico mediante bobina di superficie. Esperienza clinica iniziale

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) in the detection and localisation of prostate cancer, prospectively compared with histopathologic findings. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRSI were performed on 39 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels greater than 4 ng/ml and suspicious findings at trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS). All patients underwent a TRUS ten-core biopsy within 30 days according to a subdivision of the prostate into octants. All studies were interpreted by a dedicated radiologist who reported the areas of interest as normal, equivocal or suspicious on MRI. At MRSI, cancer was defined as possible if the ratio of choline plus creatine to citrate exceeded mean normal peripheral zone values by two standard deviations (SD) or as definite if that ratio exceeded the normal value by three SD. MRI and MRSI findings were spatially correlated with findings obtained from individual biopsy sites. MRI and MRSI alone had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of prostate cancer equal to 85%, 75%; 53%, 89%; 65%, 88%; 77%, 74%; and 69%, 79%, respectively. These values were 70%, 89%, 88%, 74% and 79% when MRI and MRSI were combined. Site-by-site analysis of MRI and MRSI findings and biopsy results yielded no significant correlation. The combination of MRSI and MRI provides a significantly higher specificity in the detection of tumours as compared with MRI alone and can be recommended as a problem-solving modality before biopsy in patients with high PSA levels and suspicious TRUS.

Follow-up of men obtaining a six-core versus a ten-core benign prostate biopsy 7 years previously

The aim of this study is to evaluate the proportion of repeat biopsies after 7 years in men with an initial benign six- or ten-core biopsy as well as the incidence of prostate cancer (PC) in the repeat biopsies. In this retrospective longitudinal study, 116 men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) who have had a benign prostate biopsy between January 1997 and September 1997 were included. Fifty-eight men had an initial benign six-core biopsy (median PSA 7.5 ng/ml, range 0.3-67) (group A), and 58 men had an initial benign ten-core biopsy (median PSA 7.5 ng/ml, range 0.8-91.4) (group B). We analysed men with a pathological PSA velocity, a persistently elevated PSA, an abnormal DRE, a high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, or atypical small acinar proliferation as indication for rebiopsy. Furthermore, we analysed a subgroup with exclusively an increased PSA velocity (>0.75 ng/ml per year) as indication for rebiopsy. In group A, 14 men had a follow-up biopsy. In this group, follow-up biopsies yielded PC in eight men (13.8%), six (10.3%) had a negative follow-up biopsy. In contrast, in group B only four men (3.4%) had a follow-up biopsy (P=0.005). Two of them (3.4%) had PC (P=0.02), two cases (3.4%) showed a benign histology (P=0.06). The use of an extended biopsy protocol at the initial evaluation reduces the number of repeat biopsies required and decreases the number of PC detection in the follow-up biopsy cohort.

Morbidity and Discomfort of Ten-Core Biopsy of the Prostate Evaluated by Questionnaire

Transition zone biopsies have been found to increase the detection rates of cancer of the prostate in patients with negative digital rectal examination. There are however no data available whether the higher biopsy rate is associated with greater morbidity. The present study was therefore designed to evaluate the complication rate of extended sextant biopsy. In this prospective study, 162 consecutive patients who presented for prostatic evaluation were included. After starting prophylactic antibiotic treatment 48 h prior to the procedure, transrectal ultrasound-guided core biopsies were obtained from each lobe: three each from the peripheral zone (apex, mid-zone and base) and two from the transition zone of each prostatic lobe. In all patients a questionnaire was obtained 10–12 days after the procedure. Major complications occurred in 3 patients. In 2 of the 3 cases major macroscopic hematuria was treated by an indwelling catheter for 1 or 2 days and 1 patient developed fever >38.5°C for 1 day. Minor macroscopic hematuria was present in 68.5% of the patients. In 17.9% of these cases, the hematuria lasted for more than 3 days. Hematospermia was observed in 19.8% and minor rectal bleeding occurred in 4.9%. Ten-core biopsies did not lead to an increase in adverse effects or complications when compared to the results of sextant biopsies reported in the literature.