Temporal Ventriloquism Research Articles

Attentional modulations of audiovisual interactions in apparent motion: Temporal ventriloquism effects on perceived visual speed.

The timing of brief stationary sounds has been shown to alter different aspects of visual motion, such as speed estimation. These effects of auditory timing have been explained by temporal ventriloquism and auditory dominance over visual information in the temporal domain. Although previous studies provide unprecedented evidence for the multisensory nature of speed estimation, how attention is involved in these audiovisual interactions remains unclear. Here, we aimed to understand the effects of spatial attention on these audiovisual interactions in time. We utilized a set of audiovisual stimuli that elicit temporal ventriloquism in visual apparent motion and asked participants to perform a speed comparison task. We manipulated attention either in the visual or auditory domain and systematically changed the number of moving objects in the visual field. When attention was diverted to a stationary object in the visual field via a secondary task, the temporal ventriloquism effects on perceived speed decreased. On the other hand, focusing attention on the auditory stimuli facilitated these effects consistently across different difficulty levels of secondary auditory task. Moreover, the effects of auditory timing on perceived speed did not change with the number of moving objects and existed in all the experimental conditions. Taken together, our findings revealed differential effects of allocating attentional resources in the visual and auditory domains. These behavioral results also demonstrate that reliable temporal ventriloquism effects on visual motion can be induced even in the presence of multiple moving objects in the visual field and under different perceptual load conditions.

Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism.

Temporal ventriloquism refers to the shift in the perceived timing of a visual stimulus towards a transient auditory stimulus presented close in time. This effect is demonstrated by greater sensitivity of temporal order judgments of two visual stimuli when a sound is presented before the first visual stimulus and after the second visual stimulus. Recent studies suggest that temporal ventriloquism is affected by cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation but not by correspondence between pitch and visual size. Here we examined the possibility that these results do not reflect a difference in the effects of different types of cross-modal correspondences on temporal ventriloquism but are rather mediated by shifts in visual-spatial attention triggered by preceding auditory stimuli. In Experiment 1, we replicated the results of previous studies that varied with the type of correspondence. Experiment 2 investigated the effects of the second audiovisual stimuli's asynchrony while the first audiovisual stimuli were synchronized. The results, unlike in Experiment 1, revealed that the magnitude of the temporal ventriloquism effect did not change with the congruency of pitch-elevation correspondence. Experiment 3 also indicated that the asynchrony of the first audiovisual stimuli modulated visual discrimination sensitivity irrespective of temporal ventriloquism. These results suggest that cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism. Greater visual sensitivity when audiovisual stimuli are congruent with pitch-elevation correspondence may be attributable to shifts in visual attention caused by pitches of the preceding auditory stimulus, which speeds up detection of the first visual stimulus.

Mindfulness Meditation Biases Visual Temporal Order Discrimination but Not Under Conditions of Temporal Ventriloquism.

This study examined how cognitive plasticity acquired from a long (8 weeks) course of mindfulness training can modulate the perceptual processing of temporal order judgment (TOJ) on a sub-second scale. Observers carried out a TOJ on two visual disks, with or without concurrent paired beeps. A temporal ventriloquism paradigm was used in which the sound beeps either were synchronized with the two disks or bracketed the visual stimuli by leading the first disk by 50 ms and lagging the other by 50 ms. A left-to-right bias in TOJ was found under the visual-only condition after mindfulness training. This bias was positively correlated with “acting with awareness,” a factor in the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, showing that awareness of every moment and enhanced attention focus magnify the left-to-right bias. However, the effect of mindfulness training may be short-lived and was not present when attention was diverted by auditory events in the cross-modal temporal ventriloquism illusion.

Splitting time: Sound-induced illusory visual temporal fission and fusion.

Auditory stimuli have been shown to alter visual temporal perception. For example, illusory temporal order is perceived when an auditory tone cues one side of space prior to the onset of simultaneously presented visual stimuli. Competing accounts attempt to explain such effects. The spatial gradient account of attention suggests speeded processing of visual stimuli in the cued space, whereas the impletion account suggests a Gestalt-like process where an attempt is made to arrive at a "realistic" representation of an event given ambiguous conditions. Temporal ventriloquism-where visual temporal order judgment performance is enhanced when a spatially uninformative tone is presented prior to, and after, visual stimuli onset-argues that the temporal relationship of the auditory stimuli to visual stimuli, as well as the number of auditory stimuli equaling the visual stimuli, drives the mechanisms underlying these and related effects. Results from a series of experiments highlight putative inconsistencies in both the spatial gradient account of attention and the classical temporal ventriloquism account. We present novel behavioral effects-illusory temporal order via spatially uninformative tones, and illusory simultaneity via a single tone prior to visual stimuli onset-that can be accounted for by an expanded version of the impletion account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The structure of audio\u2013visual consciousness

It is commonly believed that human perceptual experiences can be, and usually are, multimodal. What is more, a stronger thesis is often proposed that some perceptual multimodal characters cannot be described simply as a conjunction of unimodal phenomenal elements. If it is the case, then a question arises: what is the additional mode of combination that is required to adequately describe the phenomenal structure of multimodal experiences? The paper investigates what types of audio–visual experiences have phenomenal character that cannot be analysed as a mere conjunction of visual and auditory elements; and how can we properly characterise the required, additional mode of perceptual combination. Three main modes of combination are considered: (a) instantiation, (b) parthood, and (c) grouping. It is argued that some phenomena involving intermodal relations, like spatial and temporal ventriloquism, can be analysed in terms of audio–visual, perceptual grouping. On the other hand, cases of intermodal binding need a different treatment. Experiences involving audio–visual binding should be analysed as experiences presenting objects or events which instantiate, or which have a proper part instantiating, both visually and auditorily determined properties.

Violation of the Unity Assumption Disrupts Temporal Ventriloquism Effect in Starlings

When stimuli from different sensory modalities are received, they may be combined by the brain to form a multisensory percept. One key mechanism for multisensory binding is the unity assumption under which multisensory stimuli that share certain physical properties like temporal and/or spatial correspondence are grouped together as deriving from one object. In humans, evidence for a role of the unity assumption has been found in spatial tasks and also in temporal tasks using stimuli that share physical properties (speech-related stimuli, musical and synesthetically congruent stimuli). In our study, we investigate the role of the unity assumption in an animal model in a temporal order judgment task. When subjects are asked to indicate which of two spatially separated visual stimuli appeared first in time, performance improves when the visual stimuli are paired (in time) with spatially non-informative acoustic cues, a phenomenon known as the temporal ventriloquism effect. Here, we show that European starlings perform better when one singleton acoustic cue is paired with the first visual stimulus as compared to pairing with the second visual stimulus. This shows, in combination with our previous study, that a non-informative singleton acoustic cue, when temporally paired with the first visual stimulus, triggers alerting while, when temporally pairing with the second visual stimulus, it prevents a temporal ventriloquism effect because the unity assumption is violated. Thus, the unity assumption influences sensory perception not only in humans but also in an animal model. The importance of the unity assumption in this task supports the idea that the temporal ventriloquism effect, similar to the spatial ventriloquism effect, is based on multisensory binding and integration but not on alerting effects.

Auditory modulation of spiking activity and local field potentials in area MT does not appear to underlie an audiovisual temporal illusion.

The timing of brief stationary sounds has been shown to alter the perceived speed of visual apparent motion (AM), presumably by altering the perceived timing of the individual frames of the AM stimuli and/or the duration of the interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between those frames. To investigate the neural correlates of this "temporal ventriloquism" illusion, we recorded spiking and local field potential (LFP) activity from the middle temporal area (area MT) in awake, fixating macaques. We found that the spiking activity of most MT neurons (but not the LFP) was tuned for the ISI/speed (these parameters covaried) of our AM stimuli but that auditory timing had no effect on that tuning. We next asked whether the predicted changes in perceived timing were reflected in the timing of neuronal responses to the individual frames of the AM stimuli. Although spiking dynamics were significantly, if weakly, affected by auditory timing in a minority of neurons, the timing of spike responses did not systematically mirror the predicted perception of stimuli. Conversely, the duration of LFP responses in β- and γ-frequency bands was qualitatively consistent with human perceptual reports. We discovered, however, that LFP responses to auditory stimuli presented alone were robust and that responses to audiovisual stimuli were predicted by the linear sum of responses to auditory and visual stimuli presented individually. In conclusion, we find evidence of auditory input into area MT but not of the nonlinear audiovisual interactions we had hypothesized to underlie the illusion. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We utilized a set of audiovisual stimuli that elicit an illusion demonstrating "temporal ventriloquism" in visual motion and that have spatiotemporal intervals for which neurons within the middle temporal area are selective. We found evidence of auditory input into the middle temporal area but not of the nonlinear audiovisual interactions underlying this illusion. Our findings suggest that either the illusion was absent in our nonhuman primate subjects or the neuronal correlates of this illusion lie within other areas.

Temporal Ventriloquism Reveals Intact Audiovisual Temporal Integration in Amblyopia.

We have shown previously that amblyopia involves impaired detection of asynchrony between auditory and visual events. To distinguish whether this impairment represents a defect in temporal integration or nonintegrative multisensory processing (e.g., cross-modal matching), we used the temporal ventriloquism effect in which visual temporal order judgment (TOJ) is normally enhanced by a lagging auditory click. Participants with amblyopia (n = 9) and normally sighted controls (n = 9) performed a visual TOJ task. Pairs of clicks accompanied the two lights such that the first click preceded the first light, or second click lagged the second light by 100, 200, or 450 ms. Baseline audiovisual synchrony and visual-only conditions also were tested. Within both groups, just noticeable differences for the visual TOJ task were significantly reduced compared with baseline in the 100- and 200-ms click lag conditions. Within the amblyopia group, poorer stereo acuity and poorer visual acuity in the amblyopic eye were significantly associated with greater enhancement in visual TOJ performance in the 200-ms click lag condition. Audiovisual temporal integration is intact in amblyopia, as indicated by perceptual enhancement in the temporal ventriloquism effect. Furthermore, poorer stereo acuity and poorer visual acuity in the amblyopic eye are associated with a widened temporal binding window for the effect. These findings suggest that previously reported abnormalities in audiovisual multisensory processing may result from impaired cross-modal matching rather than a diminished capacity for temporal audiovisual integration.

Temporal ventriloquism along the path of apparent motion: speed perception under different spatial grouping principles.

The coordination of intramodal perceptual grouping and crossmodal interactions plays a critical role in constructing coherent multisensory percepts. However, the basic principles underlying such coordinating mechanisms still remain unclear. By taking advantage of an illusion called temporal ventriloquism and its influences on perceived speed, we investigated how audiovisual interactions in time are modulated by the spatial grouping principles of vision. In our experiments, we manipulated the spatial grouping principles of proximity, uniform connectedness, and similarity/common fate in apparent motion displays. Observers compared the speed of apparent motions across different sound timing conditions. Our results revealed that the effects of sound timing (i.e., temporal ventriloquism effects) on perceived speed also existed in visual displays containing more than one object and were modulated by different spatial grouping principles. In particular, uniform connectedness was found to modulate these audiovisual interactions in time. The effect of sound timing on perceived speed was smaller when horizontal connecting bars were introduced along the path of apparent motion. When the objects in each apparent motion frame were not connected or connected with vertical bars, the sound timing was more influential compared to the horizontal bar conditions. Overall, our findings here suggest that the effects of sound timing on perceived speed exist in different spatial configurations and can be modulated by certain intramodal spatial grouping principles such as uniform connectedness.

Audiovisual integration and the temporal ventriloquism effect in amblyopia

Audiovisual integration and the temporal ventriloquism effect in amblyopia

Grouping by feature of cross-modal flankers in temporal ventriloquism

Signals in one sensory modality can influence perception of another, for example the bias of visual timing by audition: temporal ventriloquism. Strong accounts of temporal ventriloquism hold that the sensory representation of visual signal timing changes to that of the nearby sound. Alternatively, underlying sensory representations do not change. Rather, perceptual grouping processes based on spatial, temporal, and featural information produce best-estimates of global event properties. In support of this interpretation, when feature-based perceptual grouping conflicts with temporal information-based in scenarios that reveal temporal ventriloquism, the effect is abolished. However, previous demonstrations of this disruption used long-range visual apparent-motion stimuli. We investigated whether similar manipulations of feature grouping could also disrupt the classical temporal ventriloquism demonstration, which occurs over a short temporal range. We estimated the precision of participants’ reports of which of two visual bars occurred first. The bars were accompanied by different cross-modal signals that onset synchronously or asynchronously with each bar. Participants’ performance improved with asynchronous presentation relative to synchronous - temporal ventriloquism - however, unlike the long-range apparent motion paradigm, this was unaffected by different combinations of cross-modal feature, suggesting that featural similarity of cross-modal signals may not modulate cross-modal temporal influences in short time scales.

Temporal ventriloquism effect in European starlings: Evidence for two parallel processing pathways.

The brain constantly has to interpret stimuli from a range of modalities originating from the same or different objects to create unambiguous percepts. The mechanisms of such multisensory processing have been intensely studied with respect to the time window of integration or the effect of spatial separation. However, the neural mechanisms remain elusive with respect to the role of alerting effects and multisensory integration. We addressed this issue by choosing a test paradigm where we could manipulate potentially alerting stimuli and simultaneously activating stimuli independently: We measured the temporal ventriloquism effect in European starlings by using the temporal order judgment paradigm with subjects judging the temporal order of the lighting of 2 spatially separated lights. If spatially noninformative acoustic stimuli were added to the visual stimuli the performance improved when the 2 visual stimuli were flanked by acoustic cues with a small time-offset compared to synchronous presentation. Two acoustic cues presented with asymmetric offsets showed that this effect was mainly driven by the cue trailing the second visual stimulus, while an acoustic cue leading the first visual stimulus had less effect. In contrast, 1 singleton acoustic cue prior to the first visual stimulus, without a second acoustic cue, enhanced performance. Our results support the hypothesis that the first stimulus pair with the leading sound activates alerting mechanisms and enhances neural processing, while the second stimulus pair with the trailing sound drives multisensory integration by simultaneous activation within the temporal binding window. (PsycINFO Database Record

Assessing the Role of the 'Unity Assumption' on Multisensory Integration: A Review.

There has been longstanding interest from both experimental psychologists and cognitive neuroscientists in the potential modulatory role of various top–down factors on multisensory integration/perception in humans. One such top–down influence, often referred to in the literature as the ‘unity assumption,’ is thought to occur in those situations in which an observer considers that various of the unisensory stimuli that they have been presented with belong to one and the same object or event (Welch and Warren, 1980). Here, we review the possible factors that may lead to the emergence of the unity assumption. We then critically evaluate the evidence concerning the consequences of the unity assumption from studies of the spatial and temporal ventriloquism effects, from the McGurk effect, and from the Colavita visual dominance paradigm. The research that has been published to date using these tasks provides support for the claim that the unity assumption influences multisensory perception under at least a subset of experimental conditions. We then consider whether the notion has been superseded in recent years by the introduction of priors in Bayesian causal inference models of human multisensory perception. We suggest that the prior of common cause (that is, the prior concerning whether multisensory signals originate from the same source or not) offers the most useful way to quantify the unity assumption as a continuous cognitive variable.

Crossmodal synesthetic congruency improves visual timing in dyslexic children

Consistent with the temporal ventriloquism effect, synesthetic correspondence between the features of visual size and auditory pitch has been shown to modulate the performance of visual temporal order judgment (TOJ) in typical adults. Here in the two main experiments we recruited seventeen dyslexic children and twenty typically developing children to perform a visual TOJ task and measured their ability of synesthetic correspondence between visual size and auditory pitch. In Experiment 1, participants were shown two consecutively presented visual discs that were temporally flanked by two synesthetic congruent or incongruent auditory beeps. In Experiment 2, participants received a crossmodal matching test (visual-size vs. auditory pitch). The results showed that compared to the typically developing group, dyslexic children benefited more from cross-modal synesthetic correspondence to partially compensate for their deficiency in visual TOJ task. The multisensory facilitation for timing performance was correlated with reading ability (Exp.1). Moreover, dyslexic children formed intact ⿿congruent⿿ matching of visually larger shapes to lower auditory pitch, and visually smaller shapes to higher auditory pitch, as did their typically developing peers (Exp 2). The results of our present study suggested general deficits of temporal processing in dyslexic children, However, with relatively intact ability of auditory pitch-visual size matching, dyslexic children could separate visual events using auditory cues. The current study also indicates a feasible way to improve the reading ability by exploiting temporal ventriloquism effect, modulated by appropriate crossmodal synesthetic associations.

Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.

Temporal ventriloquism is the shift in perceived timing of a visual stimulus that occurs when an auditory stimulus is presented close in time. This study investigated whether crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates temporal ventriloquism. Participants were presented two visual stimuli (above and below fixation) across a range of stimulus onset asynchronies and were asked to judge the order of the events. A task-irrelevant auditory click was presented shortly before the first and another shortly after the second visual stimulus. There were two pitches used (low and high) and the congruency between the auditory and visual stimuli was manipulated. The results show that incongruent pairings between pitch and elevation abolish temporal ventriloquism. In contrast, the crossmodal correspondence effect was absent when the direction of the pitch change was fixed within sessions, reducing the saliency of the pitch change. The results support previous studies suggesting that in addition to spatial and temporal factors, crossmodal correspondences can influence binding of information across the senses, although these effects are likely to be dependent on the saliency of the crossmodal mapping.

Multimodal Integration of Time

Recent studies suggest that the accuracy of duration discrimination for visually presented intervals is strongly impaired by concurrently presented auditory intervals of different duration, but not vice versa. Because these studies rely mostly on accuracy measures, it remains unclear whether this impairment results from changes in perceived duration or rather from a decrease in perceptual sensitivity. We therefore assessed complete psychometric functions in a duration discrimination task to disentangle effects on perceived duration and sensitivity. Specifically, participants compared two empty intervals marked by either visual or auditory pulses. These pulses were either presented unimodally, or accompanied by task-irrelevant pulses in the respective other modality, which defined conflicting intervals of identical, shorter, or longer duration. Participants were instructed to base their temporal judgments solely on the task-relevant modality. Despite this instruction, perceived duration was clearly biased toward the duration of the intervals marked in the task-irrelevant modality. This was not only found for the discrimination of visual intervals, but also, to a lesser extent, for the discrimination of auditory intervals. Discrimination sensitivity, however, was similar between all multimodal conditions, and only improved compared to the presentation of unimodal visual intervals. In a second experiment, evidence for multisensory integration was even found when the task-irrelevant modality did not contain any duration information, thus excluding noncompliant attention allocation as a basis of our results. Our results thus suggest that audiovisual integration of temporally discrepant signals does not impair discrimination sensitivity but rather alters perceived duration, presumably by means of a temporal ventriloquism effect.

Multimodal Integration of Interval Duration: Perceptual or Decisional Processes?

Recently, we have shown that perceived duration of visual intervals can be biased by the duration of concurrently presented auditory intervals with conflicting duration (De la Rosa & Bausenhart, 2013). We suggested that this multimodal biasing effect might be due to temporal ventriloquism (that is, the onset/offset of the visual interval gets ‘pulled’ towards the onset/offset of the auditory interval), which affects the switch component of a pacemaker-accumulator model (Gibbon, 1977). On the other hand, for filled audiovisual intervals with congruent duration, it has been suggested that multimodal integration leads to an increased pacemaker rate of an internal clock (Chen & Yeh, 2009; Walker & Scott, 1981). Importantly, both suggested mechanisms, temporal ventriloquism and pacemaker rate effect, are based on early, perceptual processes. Alternatively, however, it is possible that participants deliberately judge the visual interval duration according to the irrelevant auditory information, and, thus, the observed multimodal integration effects would emerge as the result of a decision process on a relatively late stage of processing. Therefore, in order to distinguish these two mechanisms, we propose an even-related brain potential (ERP) study with the aim to measure the mismatch negativity component (MMN; Näätänen & Alho, 1995). This component mirrors the detection of deviance at an early stage of processing and, thus, indicates underlying pre-attentive and automatic mechanisms. Interestingly, previous studies have already investigated the multimodal integration underlying the spatial ventriloquism effect by assessing the MMN (Stekelenburg, Vroomen, & de Gelder, 2004). It has been found that illusory auditory location shifts evoked by real visual location shifts produced an auditory MMN in the auditory cortex. Therefore, it was concluded that the multimodal integration underlying spatial ventriloquism takes place at a pre-attentive level of processing. Similarly, we will investigate the MMN response for conflicting audiovisual interval durations. To this end, our study consists of repeatedly presenting simultaneous audiovisual intervals with a standard duration, among which rare stimuli of deviant duration are randomly interspersed. Deviants can then occur in: (a) only the auditory modality, (b) only the visual modality, or (c) in both modalities. Additionally, unimodal visual and auditory standards and deviants will be presented as control conditions. We expect that the unimodal auditory and visual deviants evoke an auditory MMN in the auditory cortex and a visual MMN in occipital areas, respectively. Similarly, audiovisual deviants should simultaneously elicit a visual and an auditory MMN in their corresponding areas, probably with an increased magnitude compared to the unimodal conditions. Most interesting are the predictions for conflicting audiovisual intervals: If the multimodal integration of duration is an early perceptual process, auditory-only deviants in bimodal trials should bias perceived duration of the visual stimulation, and, thus, a visual MMN in occipital areas should be observed. Because auditory temporal information mostly dominates over visual temporal information, visual-only deviants in bimodal trials should be perceived as similar to the auditory (standard) duration and thus, the visual MMN in occipital areas should even be reduced compared to the unimodal visual MMN. However, if the multimodal integration of perceived duration results from a decision process on a relatively late stage of processing, no MMN for biased perceived duration would be expected, and it should just be evoked by deviant modalities with a real duration shift.

Mechanisms of Multisensory Integration in the Time Domain

Information from different senses has to be combined in order to form a meaningful and coherent representation of our environment (e.g., Calvert, Spence, & Stein, 2004; Lalanne & Lorenceau, 2004). Because there is no dedicated sense organ for the perception of duration, researchers have been especially interested in understanding which mechanisms govern such a multimodal integration in the domain of time perception (e.g., Chen & Yeh, 2009; Klink, Montijn, & van Wezel, 2011; Romei, De Haas, Mok, & Driver, 2011). In a series of experiments, we investigated to what extent visual and auditory temporal information contribute to a combined temporal percept, and we show that this mutual influence is presumably determined by low-level influences on the perceptual processing stage rather than controlled, decisional processes (Bausenhart, De la Rosa, & Ulrich, in press). Furthermore, we demonstrated that incongruent audiovisual durations seem to be integrated through the occurrence of a temporal ventriloquism effect (De la Rosa & Bausenhart, 2013). In terms of the pacemaker-accumulator model of time perception, this points to an involvement of the switch component rather than to a modulation of the pacemaker rate by incongruent audiovisual information. Moreover, not only temporally incongruent, but also spatially incongruent multimodal information seems to have an influence on perceived duration. Specifically, visuo-spatial information can evoke a Kappa effect (i.e., prolonged perceived duration for intervals defined by spatially separated signals, cf. Cohen, Hansel, & Sylvester, 1953) in the perception of auditory temporal intervals. Taken together, perceived duration is affected by temporal and spatial information from different modalities, which is effectively, flexibly, and rather automatically combined, in order to deliver a coherent and stable perceptual impression.

No evidence for impaired multisensory integration of low-level audiovisual stimuli in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorders

Abrupt click sounds can improve the visual processing of flashes in several ways. Here, we examined this in high functioning adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) using three tasks: (1) a task where clicks improve sensitivity for visual temporal order (temporal ventriloquism); (2) a task where a click improves visual search (pip-and-pop), and (3) a task where a click speeds up the visual orienting to a peripheral target (clock reading). Adolescents with ASD were, compared to adolescents with typical development (TD), impaired in judgments of visual temporal order, but they were unimpaired in visual search and orienting. Importantly, in all tasks visual performance of the ASD group improved by the presence of clicks by at least equal amounts as in the TD group. This suggests that adolescents and young adults with ASD show no generalized deficit in the multisensory integration of low-level audiovisual stimuli and/or the phasic alerting by abrupt sounds.

Multisensory integration compensates loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly

Here, we examined sensitivity of visual, auditory, and audiovisual temporal order in five age-groups (20 to 70 years old). We also measured multisensory integration (MSI) using a phenomenon known as "temporal ventriloquism," in which click sounds improve sensitivity of visual temporal order. Results showed that sensitivity of visual, auditory, and audiovisual temporal order declined from 50 years on. However, there was no corresponding decline in MSI as the click sounds actually compensated the loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly. Sensitivity of audiovisual temporal order did not correlate with MSI, suggesting that well-preserved explicit judgments about cross-modal temporal order are not required for MSI to occur.