Temporal Logic Setting Research Articles

Diagnosis of repeated failures for discrete event systems with linear-time temporal-logic specifications

In our earlier work, we introduced a state-based approach for the diagnosis of repeatedly occurring failures in discrete event systems (DESs). Since temporal logic provides a simpler way of specifying system properties; in this paper, a temporal-logic-based approach for diagnosing the occurrence of a repeated number of failures is developed. Linear-time temporal-logic (LTL) formulae are used to represent the specifications of DESs. Notions of prediagnosability for failures and diagnosability for repeated failures are introduced in the setting of temporal logic. A polynomial algorithm for the test of prediagnosability for failures is provided. The diagnosis problem for repeated failures in the temporal-logic setting is reduced to one in a state-based setting, and so the prior results of a state-based repeated failure diagnosis can be applied. Finally, a simple example is given for illustration. Note to Practitioners-Certain failures in a system are repeatable, such as routing errors in a manufacturing system. A theory for the diagnosis of such failures was presented in an earlier work of Jiang et al. The present paper uses temporal logic to specify such failures. It turns out that repeatable failures can be specified as violations of invariant properties (i.e., properties that must always hold). Given an invariant property that the system must always satisfy, an algorithm is presented to refine the system model and label those states of the refined system where the property is violated. The problem of repeated diagnosis then requires determining, within a bounded delay, each time a "failure-state" is visited. For this analysis, the existing theory developed by Jiang et al. is used.

Failure Diagnosis of Discrete-Event Systems With Linear-Time Temporal Logic Specifications

The paper studies failure diagnosis of discrete-event systems (DESs) with linear-time temporal logic (LTL) specifications. The LTL formulas are used for specifying failures in the system. The LTL-based specifications make the specification specifying process easier and more user-friendly than the formal language/automata-based specifications; and they can capture the failures representing the violation of both liveness and safety properties, whereas the prior formal language/automaton-based specifications can capture the failures representing the violation of only the safety properties (such as the occurrence of a faulty event or the arrival at a failed state). Prediagnosability and diagnosability of DESs in the temporal logic setting are defined. The problem of testing prediagnosability and diagnosability is reduced to the problem of model checking. An algorithm for the test of prediagnosability and diagnosability, and the synthesis of a diagnoser is obtained. The complexity of the algorithm is exponential in the length of each specification LTL formula, and polynomial in the number of system states and the number of specifications. The requirement of nonexistence of unobservable cycles in the system, which is needed for the diagnosis algorithms in prior methods to work, is relaxed. Finally, a simple example is given for illustration.

From Rewrite Theories to Temporal Logic Theories

The work presented here aims at bridging the gap between executable specifications and formal verification. In this paper we combine two levels of description without changing the framework. The operational level of Maude/rewriting logic and the property-oriented level of temporal logics are combined. The combination is done by an embedding. We propose a distributed temporal logic as an extension of rewriting logic. Rewriting logic is primarily a logic of change in which the deduction directly corresponds to the computation. In contrast to that, temporal logic is a logic to talk about change in a global way. Especially, more complex system properties such as safety and liveness can be regarded in a temporal logic setting. In our approach we maintain the possibility of executing Maude specifications on the rewrite machine for validation purposes, and add the possibility of formally reasoning about Maude specifications in a temporal logic setting. The work presented focuses on object-oriented Maude specifications.