Organothiols and related organosulfur compounds hold promise for use as self-assembled ultra-thin electron beam resists, II–VI material growth precursors, and monolayer passivation layers. We report the results of temperature-programmed reaction and desorption (TPR/D) studies of the surface chemistry of three model organosulfur compounds, CH 3SH, (CH 3S) 2 and (CH 3) 2S, on the (110) face of gallium arsenide. Our measurements indicate that each of these species interacts strongly with the GaAs(110) surface. The first monolayer of CH 3SH desorbs at ∼300 K, with a desorption wave peak temperature (extrapolated to the zero coverage limit) corresponding to a desorption activation energy of 0.81 eV. This value is high compared to ∼110 K for the second layer, suggesting a chemical interaction between the thiol and the surface, despite the fact that the monolayer feature in the TPR/D spectra exhibits first-order kinetics, and the molecule is observed to desorb intact. The behavior of (CH 3S) 2 is markedly different; the disulfide decomposes upon adsorption (or during the TPR/D temperature ramp) and desorbs predominantly as (CH 3) 2S at ∼500 K, perhaps as the result of a concerted associative/dissociative desorption process that leaves sulfur at the surface. This result is also evidence that adsorbed CH 3SH and (CH 3) 2S do not assume equivalent surface-bound forms and supports the idea that the hydrogen atom of the thiol remains in close association with the adsorbed parent molecule, while the disulfide undergoes dissociative adsorption. Finally, our results indicate that (CH 3) 2S, like CH 3SH, molecularly adsorbs/desorbs. The desorption activation energy, extrapolated to zero coverage, is 0.79 eV, consistent with a strong adsorbate–substrate interaction. The similarity of this value to that for CH 3SH suggests that a specific sulfur–surface interaction dominates the desorption kinetics at low coverage. In the monolayer regime, with increasing exposure, the monolayer desorption feature in the TPR/D spectra broadens and exhibits strong asymmetry, and ultimately develops a lower temperature feature, indicating complex kinetics consistent with coverage-dependent phase behavior. Finally, by comparison of the measured desorption energies of the organosulfur compounds with those of the alkyl halides, for which the adsorption on GaAs(110) has been extensively investigated, an estimation of the chemical and physical contributions to the molecule–surface interaction is obtained. Our analysis suggests that both types of interactions play important roles in the adsorption energetics.