Telephone Coaching Research Articles

Impact of telephone coaching supporting a physical maintenance exercise programme for older adults at risk of falls: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundEncouraging compliance with recommended levels of exercise for older adults is a public health challenge. A minimal-resource solution is telephone coaching.ObjectivesPrimary aim: to compare timed up and go (TUG) performance 6 months after beginning a home exercise program between a group of older individuals who received additional telephone coaching, and a control group performing the home exercise program alone. Secondary aims: to compare functional and fall-related outcomes between groups at 6 and 12 months.MethodsMulticentre, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled, open label, prospective study. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 65 years, ≥ 1 fall in the past year, and discharged home from hospital rehabilitation or outpatient physiotherapy. All participants received a home exercise booklet and were asked to perform a set of exercises as often as possible (daily). The coaching group additionally received a monthly telephone call (total 5 calls) from their previous physiotherapist. Primary outcome was TUG performance at 6 months. Outcomes were measured at inclusion, and at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was analysed using a linear mixed model adjusted for the baseline value.ResultsIn total, 99 individuals were included (coaching group n = 50, control group, n = 49; mean [SD] age 83.1 [5.8] years and 77% women). TUG performance did not differ between groups at 6 months (adjusted difference 1.37, SE 1.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.01, p = 0.30). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups at 6 or 12 months except compliance to the exercise program was higher in the coaching than the control group at 6 months (adjusted difference 1.0, SE 0.5, 95% CI 0.02 to 2.0, p = 0.05).ConclusionsThe lack of difference between the groups in the time taken to complete the TUG at 6 months suggests that the monthly telephone coaching sessions did not improve the effectiveness of a home exercise programme in elderly people who had suffered at least one fall. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02828826; 11th of july 2016, last modification 16th of September 2024).

Telecoaching of Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis After Inpatient Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation: The Danish MS Hospitals Rehabilitation Study.

Inpatient rehabilitation improves health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the obtained improvements decline once people return home. The challenge is to find ways to preserve the beneficial effects for the long term. We investigated whether monthly telecoaching after discharge would enhance the long-term carryover of improvements. We conducted a 1-year exploratory study with 2 delivery methods: telephone coaching and web-based coaching. After discharge, the telephone group received monthly calls; the web-based group responded to monthly online coaching questions. Based on their rehabilitation goals, we put patients into a neuropsychological group or a physical group. In addition, we matched each patient with similar wait-list control patients and treatment patients from the main study. The primary outcome was HRQOL measured by the Functional Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS). The neuropsychological group had long-term preservation of HRQOL with both delivery methods, with telephone coaching seeming to be superior. Mean differences in FAMS at the 12-month median follow-up for the neuropsychological group compared with the control wait-list control group were for the telephone group: + 15.4 (95% CI, 3.5-27.4; P = .011); for the web-based group: + 10.9 (95% CI, -3.3 to 25.2; P = .130); for the control treatment group: + 6.9 (95% CI, 0.6-13.3; P = .031). The physical group saw no beneficial effects from telecoaching. Following inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation, monthly telecoaching of individuals with MS with neuropsychological challenges enhanced the long-term carryover of HRQOL, with one-on-one telephone coaching showing more pronounced improvements than web-based automated coaching.

Long-Term Effects of Transtheoretical Model-Based Lifestyle Intervention on Self-efficacy and Self-management in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes - Randomised Controlled Trial.

Self-efficacy and self-management are fundamental factors for successful treatment of type 2 diabetes, but long-term studies are rare. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether the effects achieved in the context of a lifestyle intervention based on the transtheoretical model can be maintained by the patients in the long term. A two-arm randomised controlled trial examined whether long-term effects of self-efficacy, self-management, and HbA1c can be achieved by a lifestyle intervention of 12 months and persisted beyond the intervention. During the intervention, the intervention group (n = 86, mean age 59.7 years) was supported by a telephone coach and telemedical devices, while the control group (n = 65, mean age 58.8 years) received regular care. In the year after intervention, both groups received standard care. The intervention group achieved significantly better self-management after 12 and 24 months (12M, 1.11 (0.81; 1.41) p < .000; 24M, 0.52 (0.19; 0.85) p = .002) as well as self-efficacy (12M, 1.18 (0.83; 1.52) p < .000; 24M, 0.76 (0.39; 1.13) p < .000) and HbA1c than the control group. TTM-based lifestyle interventions show a long-term effect beyond the duration of the intervention in most areas, and behavioural changes can be sustained by patients.

A character-strengths based coaching intervention to improve wellbeing of rural community health workers in Madhya Pradesh, India: Protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThere is scarce knowledge on the use of structured positive psychology interventions for reducing work-stress and improving wellbeing of rural community health workers in India, particularly the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) who are village-level (resident women, incentivised) lay health workers. This trial will test the effectiveness of a ‘character-strengths’ based coaching intervention compared to routine supervision on wellbeing (‘authentic happiness’) of ASHAs. MethodsThis protocol is for a single-blind, parallel group randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of a five-day residential workshop focusing on the use of character-strengths and subsequent 8- to 10-week remote telephonic coaching (weekly) to individually support ASHAs to improve their wellbeing, against routine health system support. The arms are intervention added to routine ASHA supervision (weekly, by the ASHA supervisor), and routine supervision alone (control arm). The target sample comprises 330 rural ASHAs in Madhya Pradesh, India. The primary outcome of mean Authentic Happiness Inventory (AHI) scores will be compared between arms at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include an assessment of ASHA's self-reported affect, self-efficacy, flourishing, burnout, motivation, physical health symptoms, quality of life, and routine work performance indicators, and the consequent patient-level outcomes [e.g., service satisfaction and depression remission rates after receiving brief psychological treatment by trained ASHAs]. We will also evaluate the costs of developing and delivering the intervention. DiscussionThis trial will determine whether a character-strengths based coaching intervention is an effective and scalable approach for reducing work-stress and improving wellbeing of rural ASHAs in low-resource settings.

Patients’ and stakeholders’ experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation

BackgroundChronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease cause medical, social, and economic burdens worldwide. Disease management programs in Germany mostly lack components to improve patients’ self-management and health-promoting lifestyles despite clear guideline recommendations. Therefore, a Personalized Self-Management Support Program (P-SUP) was developed, which includes: (1) peer support groups; (2) telephone coaching; (3) feedback reports and, (4) a web portal. This study aims to explore patients’ and implementing stakeholders’ experiences in the implementation of P-SUP to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face focus group interviews with participating patients and telephone-based one-to-one expert interviews with implementing stakeholders, involved in the delivery of the intervention. The transcribed interview reports were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and the contents were categorized according to Donabedian’s Structure-Process-Outcome framework.ResultsA total of six themes among patients (N = 35) and five themes among implementing stakeholders (N = 32) represent the experiences. The patient themes were: (1) technical conditions, (2) indoor facilities, (3) group composition, (4) acceptance of digital components, (5) supervision and feedback and (6) impact on lifestyle behavior. The themes among the implementing stakeholders were: (1) multiprofessional approach, (2) human resources, (3) patient acceptance, (4) supervision and feedback and (5) impact on lifestyle behavior.ConclusionsMultiprofessional interventions such as P-SUP appear to be valuable for patients and implementing stakeholders. Although infrastructural barriers made the implementation of peer support and digital patient education difficult, patients rated the exchange with peers and experts on health-related topics positively. The lack of supervision and feedback during the course of the intervention might be compensated by regular telephone coaching. The findings from this study can be used in future studies to guide researchers and implementing stakeholders and to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of complex interventions in different contexts.Trial registrationThe P-SUP study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 16/07/2020 under the registration number DRKS00020592.

Effectiveness of NSW health get healthy telephone coaching in adults screened from general practices

BackgroundThe effectiveness of the NSW Health “Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service®”(Get Healthy) to facilitate weight loss on a population scale has been documented, but this was based on self-reported measures. Our study aims to test the effectiveness of the Get Healthy Service on objectively measured weight, BMI, waist circumference, and changes in other health behaviours, including nutrition, physical activity and alcohol intake.MethodsMen and women aged 40–70 years (n = 154) with pre-diabetes (5.7% < HbA1c < 6.5%) were referred from GP Practices to the Get Healthy Service, NSW Health. A subset (n = 98) participated in the “Zinc In Preventing the Progression of pre-Diabetes” (ZIPPeD) trial (ACTRN12618001120268).ResultsThe self-reported outcomes showed a statistically significant improvement from baseline to 12 months in weight (mean 2.7 kg loss, p < 0.001), BMI (mean 1 unit reduction, p < 0.001), and waist circumference (mean 4.3 cm reduction, p < 0.001). However, in the objectively measured outcomes from ZIPPeD, the differences were more modest, with point estimates of 0.8 kg mean weight loss (p = 0.1), 0.4 unit reduction in BMI (p = 0.03), and 1.8 cm reduction in waist circumference (p = 0.04). Bland-Altman plots indicated that discrepancies were due to a small number of participants who dramatically underestimated their weight or BMI. There were minimal changes in nutrition, physical activity, and alcohol.ConclusionsThe potential benefits of Get Healthy should be interpreted with caution as we have shown significant differences between self-reported and objectively measured values. More valid and objective evidence is needed to determine the program’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Limited data suggest that early palliative care (EPC) improves quality of life (QOL) and survival in patients with advanced cancer. To evaluate whether comprehensive EPC improves QOL; relieves mental, social, and existential burdens; increases survival rates; and helps patients develop coping skills. This nonblinded randomized clinical trial (RCT) recruited patients from 12 hospitals in South Korea from September 2017 to October 2018. Patients aged 20 years or older with advanced cancer who were not terminally ill but for whom standard chemotherapy has not been effective were eligible. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the control (receiving usual supportive oncological care) or intervention (receiving EPC with usual oncological care) group. Intention-to-treat data analysis was conducted between September and December 2022. The intervention group received EPC through a structured program of self-study education materials, telephone coaching, and regular assessments by an integrated palliative care team. The primary outcome was the change in overall QOL score (assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care) from baseline to 24 weeks after enrollment, with evaluations also conducted at 12 and 18 weeks. Secondary outcomes were social and existential burdens (assessed with the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire) as well as crisis-overcoming capacity and 2-year survival. A total of 144 patients (83 males [57.6%]; mean [SD] age, 60.7 (7.2) years) were enrolled, of whom 73 were randomized to the intervention group and 71 to the control group. The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater changes in scores in overall health status or QOL from baseline, especially at 18 weeks (11.00 [95% CI, 0.78-21.22] points; P = .04; effect size = 0.42). However, at 12 and 24 weeks, there were no significant differences observed. Compared with the control group, the intervention group also showed significant improvement in self-management or coping skills over 24 weeks (20.51 [95% CI, 12.41-28.61] points; P < .001; effect size = 0.93). While the overall survival rate was higher in the intervention vs control group, the difference was not significant. In the intervention group, however, those who received 10 or more EPC interventions (eg, telephone coaching sessions and care team meetings) showed a significantly increased probability of 2-year survival (53.6%; P < .001). This RCT demonstrated that EPC enhanced QOL at 18 weeks; however, no significant improvements were observed at 12 and 24 weeks. An increased number of interventions sessions was associated with increased 2-year survival rates in the intervention group. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181854.

A pediatric primary care practice-based obesity intervention to support families: a cluster-randomized clinical trial.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pediatric practices help families make lifestyle changes to improve BMI, but provider time and access to treatment are limited. This study compared the effectiveness of two pediatric practice-based referral interventions in reducing BMI. In this cluster-randomized clinical trial, 20 pediatric primary care practices were randomized to telephonic coaching (Fitline Coaching) or mailed workbook (Fitline Workbook). Parents and their 8- to 12-year-old children with BMI ≥ 85th percentile completed assessments at baseline and at6 and 12 months post baseline. Primary outcomes were 12-month BMI percentile and z score. A total of 501 children and their parents received Fitline Coaching (n = 243) or Fitline Workbook (n = 258); 26.8% had overweight, 55.4% had obesity, and 17.8% had severe obesity. Mean (SD) age was 10.5 (1.4), and 47.5% were female. BMI percentile improved in both groups; 12-month decline in continuous BMI z score was not statistically significant in either group. However, 20.8% of telephonic coaching participants and 12.4% of workbook participants achieved a clinically significant reduction of at least 0.25 in BMI z score, a significant between-group difference (p = 0.0415). Both low-intensity interventions were acceptable and produced modest improvements in BMI percentile. One in five children in the telephonic coaching condition achieved clinically meaningful BMI z score improvements. However, more research is needed before such a program could be recommended for pediatric primary care practice.

A nurse-led coaching intervention with home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure: Protocol for a feasibility randomized clinical trial

Poor treatment adherence and lack of self-care behaviors are significant contributors to hospital readmissions of people with heart failure (HF). A transitional program with non-invasive telemonitoring may help sustain patients and their caregivers to timely recognize signs and symptoms of exacerbation.We will conduct a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a 6-month supportive intervention for patients discharged home after cardiac decompensation. Forty-five people aged 65 years and over will be randomized to either receive a supportive intervention in addition to standard care, which combines nurse-led telephone coaching and a home-based self-monitoring vital signs program, or standard care alone. Four aspects of the feasibility will be assessed using a mixed-methods approach: process outcomes (e.g., recruitment rate), resources required (e.g., adherence to the intervention), management data (e.g., completeness of data collection), and scientific value (e.g. 90- and 180-day all-cause and HF-related readmissions, self-care capacity, quality of life, psychological well-being, mortality, etc.). Participants will be interviewed to explore preferences and satisfaction with the intervention. The study is expected to provide valuable insight into the design of a definitive RCT.

Two-year Follow-up of Internet-based Parent Training with Telephone Coaching Aimed at Treating Child Disruptive Behaviors in a Clinical Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)

Two-year Follow-up of Internet-based Parent Training with Telephone Coaching Aimed at Treating Child Disruptive Behaviors in a Clinical Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)

An Adaptive Telephone Coaching Intervention for Patients in an Online Weight Loss Program

Weight loss (WL) during the first month of a behavioral program is associated with longer-term WL. Testing of translatable and adaptive obesity programs is needed. To compare brief, extended, and no telephone coaching for individuals with suboptimal response (ie, 1-month WL <4%) within an online WL program. This randomized clinical trial with enrollment between March 2019 and April 2022 (data collection completed May 2023) was conducted at an academic research center in the US. Eligible participants included adults aged 18 to 70 years with daily access to internet and a body mass index between 25 and 45. All participants received an automated online WL program (4 months) and WL maintenance program (8 months), consisting of video lessons, self-monitoring, and personalized feedback. Participants were randomized, such that individuals with suboptimal response received either brief telephone coaching (3 calls during weeks 5-8), extended telephone coaching (12 calls during weeks 5-16), or no coaching (control). Coaching included education, problem solving, and goal setting, and promoted engagement with the online program. The primary outcomes were percent weight change and proportion of participants achieving 5% or greater WL at 4 and 12 months. A priori hypotheses for WL were that WL for extended coaching would be greater than for brief coaching, and both extended and brief coaching would be greater than no coaching (control). A longitudinal mixed-effects model with participant-specific intercept was used to examine intervention effects on percent WL at 4 and 12 months. Secondary analyses focused on program engagement and cost/kilogram of WL. The study included a total of 437 participants who reported WL at 1 month (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [11.4] years; mean [SD] BMI, 34.6 [5.0]; 305 female [69.8%] and 132 male [30.2%]) with 148 randomized to extended coaching, 143 assigned to brief coaching, and 146 assigned to the control group. Of all participants, 346 (79.2%) were considered to have a suboptimal response. WL at 4 months was significantly greater in the extended coaching group (mean [SD] WL, -7.0% [5.1%]) and brief coaching group (mean [SD] WL, -6.2% [4.7%]) vs the control group (mean [SD] WL, -4.5% [4.7%]) (P < .001). Similarly, the proportion of participants achieving 5% or greater WL at 4 months was greater in the extended coaching group (89 participants [65.9%]) and brief coaching group (77 participants [58.5%]) vs control group (46 participants [36.5%]) (P < .001). At 12 months, a similar pattern was observed for achievement of 5% WL or greater (extended coaching, 63 participants [48.1%]; brief coaching, 58 participants [45.9%]; control, 38 participants [32.8%]; P = .03). Percent WL at 12 months was significantly higher in extended coaching vs control (mean [SD] WL for extended coaching, -5.5% [6.7%]; mean [SD] WL for control, -3.9% [7.4%]; P = .03) but not for brief coaching (mean [SD] WL, -4.9% [6.1%]).Both the brief and extended coaching groups watched more lessons and self-monitored on more days compared with the control group. The cost per additional kilogram of WL, beyond that of the control group, was $50.09 for brief coaching and $92.65 for extended coaching. In this randomized clinical trial testing an adaptive intervention, the provision of coaching for individuals with suboptimal response improved WL and was cost-effective; further testing in clinical settings (eg, health care systems) is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03867981.

An Adaptive Behavioral Intervention for Weight Loss Management

Lifestyle interventions for weight loss are difficult to implement in clinical practice. Self-managed mobile health implementations without or with added support after unsuccessful weight loss attempts could offer effective population-level obesity management. To test whether a wireless feedback system (WFS) yields noninferior weight loss vs WFS plus telephone coaching and whether participants who do not respond to initial treatment achieve greater weight loss with more vs less vigorous step-up interventions. In this noninferiority randomized trial, 400 adults aged 18 to 60 years with a body mass index of 27 to 45 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo 3 months of treatment initially with WFS or WFS plus coaching at a US academic medical center between June 2017 and March 2021. Participants attaining suboptimal weight loss were rerandomized to undergo modest or vigorous step-up intervention. The WFS included a Wi-Fi activity tracker and scale transmitting data to a smartphone app to provide daily feedback on progress in lifestyle change and weight loss, and WFS plus coaching added 12 weekly 10- to 15-minute supportive coaching calls delivered by bachelor's degree-level health promotionists viewing participants' self-monitoring data on a dashboard; step-up interventions included supportive messaging via mobile device screen notifications (app-based screen alerts) without or with coaching or powdered meal replacement. Participants and staff were unblinded and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment randomization. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in 6-month weight change, with the noninferiority margin defined as a difference in weight change of -2.5 kg; secondary outcomes included between-group differences for all participants in weight change at 3 and 12 months and between-group 6-month weight change difference among nonresponders exposed to modest vs vigorous step-up interventions. Among 400 participants (mean [SD] age, 40.5 [11.2] years; 305 [76.3%] women; 81 participants were Black and 266 were White; mean [SD] body mass index, 34.4 [4.3]) randomized to undergo WFS (n = 199) vs WFS plus coaching (n = 201), outcome data were available for 342 participants (85.5%) at 6 months. Six-month weight loss was -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0) for the WFS group and -4.8 kg (95% CI, -5.5 to -4.1) for participants in the WFS plus coaching group (difference in weight change, -2.0 kg [90% CI, -2.9 to -1.1]; P < .001); the 90% CI included the noninferiority margin of -2.5 kg. Weight change differences were comparable at 3 and 12 months and, among nonresponders, at 6 months, with no difference by step-up therapy. A wireless feedback system (Wi-Fi activity tracker and scale with smartphone app to provide daily feedback) was not noninferior to the same system with added coaching. Continued efforts are needed to identify strategies for weight loss management and to accurately select interventions for different individuals to achieve weight loss goals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02997943.

The effects of an integrated supportive programme on oral health in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial.

This study determines the effect of an integrated 12-month follow-up support programme on the oral health of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who received radiotherapy (RT). Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 47) or a control group (n = 45). The intervention group received usual care and an integrated supportive programme, which included face-to-face education and telephone coaching. The control group received usual care. After a clinical dental examination, the prevalence of caries, gingival inflammation and plaque were registered. Oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14 and the WHO Oral Health Questionnaire for Adults were used to evaluate oral health in both groups. A total of 79 participants completed a 12-month follow-up. The intervention group had lower caries increment between baseline and the 12-month follow-up compared with controls, although this was not statistically significant. After 12 months, the intervention group had statistically significant better outcomes in the plaque index (p = 0.038) and the OHIP-14 (p = 0.002) than the control group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups concerning gingival index. However, the intervention group reported an overall better state of teeth (p = 0.034) and gums after 12 months (p = 0.042). The integrated supportive programme showed positive effects on improving oral health in patients with HNC regarding plaque control, the state of teeth and gums and oral health-related quality of life during the 12-month follow-up.

Abstract P290: Telephone Lifestyle Coaching - Sex Differences in Referrals and Enrollment During National Implementation

Objectives: Telephone Lifestyle Coaching (TLC) is an evidence-based program providing individualized telephone coaching and self-management support to Veterans working on personalized, healthy living SMART goals. Given the flexibility of telephone support, we explored sex differences in TLC referrals and enrollment. We focus on sex to identify potential opportunities with virtual/telephone prevention programs in VA. Methods: Since March 2019, 44 VA sites have implemented TLC nationwide. Under VA’s QUERI rapid response evaluation program, we examined sex differences in referrals and enrollment with logistic regression controlling for demographics, mental and physical health, prior participation in a VA Whole Health Program and VA’s MOVE! Weight Management Program, and site-level clustering. The sample included all Veterans with at least one primary care visit one year prior to starting TLC. Results: As of 12/31/22, a total of 11,719 Veterans had at least one TLC referral, with 9,514 enrolled (82%), totaling 122,233 encounters. For both referrals and enrollment, mean age was 54, with 33% female, 29% Black, 7% Hispanic, and 34% with rural residence. In adjusted models, female Veterans had increased odds of being referred (OR=2.40, CI:1.89-3.05) and enrolling (OR=1.27, CI:1.13-1.42) compared to male Veterans. Odds of referral were higher for younger Veterans (OR=0.98, CI:0.97-0.98), those with depression (OR=1.62, CI:1.46-1.81), PTSD (OR=1.45, CI:1.21-1.73), overweight/obesity (OR=2.38, CI:1.58-3.57), at least one cardiovascular (CV) risk (OR=1.94, CI:1.63-2.30), and prior participation in Whole Health (OR=2.46, CI:1.74-3.51) or MOVE! (OR=6.40; CI:4.02-10.19). Similar associations with enrollment were observed, except Veterans with depression had decreased odds of enrollment (OR=0.84, CI:0.750.93), and effects for PTSD and CV risks were not significant. Conclusions: TLC demonstrated success in reach and engagement of female Veterans at rates above their national proportions in VA care. Referrals targeted weight and CV risk consistent with Veteran clinical needs. Our findings suggest that prior participation with MOVE! and Whole Health may facilitate engagement. Mental health diagnoses were not a barrier to referral, but depression status may reduce patient participation. Impact: TLC and virtual modalities of lifestyle coaching may have broader application for reaching and engaging female Veterans, as well as Veterans with mental health and CV risks who can benefit from health behavior change to optimize care.

Exploring organisational readiness to implement a preventive intervention in Australian general practice for overweight and obese patients: key learnings from the HeLP-GP trial.

The HeLP-GP trial aimed to increase the capacity of practice nurses to deliver weight management to overweight and obese patients through an intervention comprising a health check, a lifestyle app and/or telephone coaching. This paper describes implementation through the lens of organisational readiness with emphasis on the role of the practice nurse. Routinely collected mixed method research data including practice surveys, field notes, and diaries and process data were mapped against the domains: motivation to implement, general capacity and intervention-specific capacity. Organisational readiness varied considerably, particularly the domain of intervention-specific capacity. Practice nurse turnover negatively impacted the implementation, affecting half of the practices. We observed a general lack of practice-based support for intervention delivery, and varying levels of interest, skill and confidence in delivering the intervention. Nurses struggled to complete the research and intervention tasks in a timely way. Conducting risk assessments and referring to coaching were generally not problematic; however, we noted lower confidence levels with the lifestyle app and instructing patients to use it. We found a lack of general 'readiness' inherent in the nursing role, particularly related to their capacity to complete intervention tasks and practice-level support to implement the intervention. For nurses in general practice to fulfil their potential in supporting patients to reduce risk and adopt healthier life choices, our study indicates that more could be done to improve their workforce positioning and remuneration, which may, in turn, improve continuity of care, retention and individual motivation.

Long-term effects of a telemedically-assisted lifestyle intervention on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes – A two-armed randomised controlled trial in Germany

PurposeDiabetes is considered one of the fastest growing diseases worldwide. Especially in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle interventions have proven to be effective. However, long-term studies in real-world contexts are rare, which is why further research is needed. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether effects achieved in the context of a long-term lifestyle intervention can be sustained by patients in the long term.MethodsIn a two-arm randomized trial we compared diabetes care as usual to a lifestyle intervention combining telemedically support and individual needs-based telephone coaching. The study included 151 patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to either the intervention or control group. Intervention Group (IG; N = 86, 80.2% male, mean age: 59.7) received telemedical devices and telephone coaching over a period of 12 months, Control Group (CG; N = 65, 83.1% male, mean age: 58,8) received care as usual. The primary outcome was chance in HbA1c. A follow-up survey was conducted after 24 months.ResultsThe intervention group showed significantly better HbA1c- values compared to the control group at both 12 and 24 months (12 M: − 0.52 (-0.73; − 0.32), p < .000; 24 M: − 0.38 (-0.61; − 0.15), p = .001). The strongest change was seen in the first three months, with the best value obtained at 6 months and stable thereafter.ConclusionCombined telephone coaching with telemedicine support could lead to better long-term glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. In the future, more long-term studies should be conducted in real-world settings and lifestyle interventions should be offered more widely.

How to promote usage of telehealth interventions for farmers' mental health? A qualitative study on supporting and hindering aspects for acceptance and satisfaction with a personalized telephone coaching for depression prevention

Low-threshold and remotely delivered preventive interventions, like telephone coaching, are warranted for farmers who experience multiple risk factors for depression, live in underserved areas, and show low help-seeking behavior. Factors facilitating uptake and actual use of effective remote interventions are important to reduce depression disease burden. This study aimed at identifying factors that potentially can influence acceptance of and satisfaction with a telephone coaching in this occupational group.Semi-structured interviews were based on the ‘Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology’, the ‘Evaluation’, and ‘Discrepancy’ models for satisfaction. Interviews were conducted with 20 of 66 invited participants of a 6-months telephone coaching during an effectiveness or implementation study. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed (deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis). Independent coding by two persons resulted in good agreement (Κ = 0.80). Participants validated results via questionnaire.Overall, 32 supporting (SF) and 14 hindering factors (HF) for acceptance and satisfaction were identified and organized into five dimensions: Coaching result (SF = 9, HF = 3), coach (SF = 9, HF = 1), organization (SF = 5, HF = 2), the telephone as communication medium (SF = 4, HF = 5) and participant characteristics (SF = 5, HF = 3). Most named SFs were ‘Flexible appointment arrangement’ (n = 19/95 %) and ‘low effort’ (n = 17/85 %), while most reported HFs were ‘lack of visual cues’ (n = 12/60 %) and ‘social/professional involvement restricts change process’ (n = 10/50 %).The perceived changes initiated by coaching, a low effort through telephone conduct, and the indicated personalization were identified as important influencing factors on acceptance and satisfaction based on interviewees' statements. Both may be further enhanced by offering choice and advice for delivery formats (e.g., video-calls) and training of coaches in farm-related issues. Study registrationGerman Clinical Trial Registrations: DRKS00017078 and DRKS00015655.

Study Design, Rationale, and Methodology for Promote Weight Loss in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Who Also Have Obesity: The PROVE Trial.

Background Overweight and obesity are associated with adverse functional outcomes in people with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The effects of weight loss in people with overweight/obesity and PAD are unknown. Methods The PROVE (Promote Weight Loss in Obese PAD Patients to Prevent Mobility Loss) Trial is a multicentered randomized clinical trial with the primary aim of testing whether a behavioral intervention designed to help participants with PAD lose weight and walk for exercise improves 6-minute walk distance at 12-month follow-up, compared with walking exercise alone. A total of 212 participants with PAD and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 will be randomized. Interventions are delivered using a Group Mediated Cognitive Behavioral intervention model, a smartphone application, and individual telephone coaching. The primary outcome is 12-month change in 6-minute walk distance. Secondary outcomes include total minutes of walking exercise/wk at 12-month follow-up and 12-month change in accelerometer-measured physical activity, the Walking Impairment Questionnaire distance score, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System mobility questionnaire. Tertiary outcomes include 12-month changes in perceived exertional effort at the end of the 6-minute walk, diet quality, and the Short Physical Performance Battery. Exploratory outcomes include changes in gastrocnemius muscle biopsy measures of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase activity, mitochondrial biogenesis, capillary density, and inflammatory markers. Conclusions The PROVE randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effects of exercise with an intervention of coaching and a smartphone application designed to achieve weight loss, compared with exercise alone, on walking performance in people with PAD and overweight/obesity. Results will inform optimal treatment for the growing number of patients with PAD who have overweight/obesity. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04228978.

Optimizing Longitudinal Tobacco Cessation Treatment in Lung Cancer Screening

Nearly half of the 14.8 million US adults eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS) smoke cigarettes. The optimal smoking cessation program components for the LCS setting are unclear. To assess the effect of adding a referral to prescription medication therapy management (MTM) to the tobacco longitudinal care (TLC) program among patients eligible for LCS who smoke and do not respond to early tobacco treatment and to assess the effect of decreasing the intensity of TLC among participants who do respond to early treatment. This randomized clinical trial included patients who currently smoked cigarettes daily and were eligible for LCS. Recruitment took place at primary care centers and LCS programs at 3 large health systems in the US and began in October 2016, and 18-month follow-up was completed April 2021. (1) TLC comprising intensive telephone coaching and combination nicotine replacement therapy for 1 year with at least monthly contact; (2) TLC with MTM, MTM offered pharmacist-referral for prescription medications; and (3) Quarterly TLC, intensity of TLC was decreased to quarterly contact. Intervention assignments were based on early response to tobacco treatment (abstinence) that was assessed either 4 weeks or 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Self-reported, 6-month prolonged abstinence at 18-month. Of 636 participants, 228 (35.9%) were female, 564 (89.4%) were White individuals, and the median (IQR) age was 64.3 (59.6-68.8) years. Four weeks or 8 weeks after treatment initiation, 510 participants (80.2%) continued to smoke (ie, early treatment nonresponders) and 126 participants (19.8%) had quit (ie, early treatment responders). The 18 month follow-up survey response rate was 83.2% (529 of 636). Across TLC groups at 18 months follow-up, the overall 6-month prolonged abstinence rate was 24.4% (129 of 529). Among the 416 early treatment nonresponders, 6-month prolonged abstinence for TLC with MTM vs TLC was 17.8% vs 16.4% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13; 95% CI, 0.67-1.89). In TLC with MTM, 98 of 254 participants (39%) completed at least 1 MTM visit. Among 113 early treatment responders, 6-month prolonged abstinence for Quarterly TLC vs TLC was 24 of 55 (43.6%) vs 34 of 58 (58.6%) (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.25-1.17). In this randomized clinical trial, adding referral to MTM with TLC for participants who did not respond to early treatment did not improve smoking abstinence. Stepping down to Quarterly TLC among early treatment responders is not recommended. Integrating longitudinal tobacco cessation care with LCS is feasible and associated with clinically meaningful quit rates. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02597491.

Effects of a bowel function improvement program for patients with rectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a bowel function improvement program for male patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection. MethodsA prospective, unblinded, and randomized controlled trial was conducted. The enrolled 42 patients were assigned to the experimental or control group at a 1:1 ratio. The bowel function improvement program comprised a 4-week intensive program (face-to-face education and telephone coaching) and an 8-week maintenance program (text messages). Self-efficacy, bowel function, health-related quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization were measured. Collected data were analyzed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, analysis of covariance, and generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effects of the program based on intention-to-treat. ResultsThe bowel function improvement program was effective in improving bowel function 3 months after discharge. Additionally, the number of unplanned pharmacy visits was lower in the experimental group than in the control group. Health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and utilization of other healthcare resources were not statistically or clinically significant. ConclusionThese findings indicated that the bowel function improvement program for male patients with rectal cancer was effective in improving bowel function and reducing unplanned healthcare resource utilization. The bowel function improvement program can be delivered as a nurse-led program in clinical practice to promote early recovery after low anterior resection. Trial registration numberKCT0003505. https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/13708.