Telemedicine In Germany Research Articles

Prospective Randomized Study on the Use of Robot-Assisted Postoperative Visits.

Introduction: Robot-assisted visits, as part of telemedicine, can offer doctors the opportunity to take care of patients. Due to theCOVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in telemedicine. The use of teleconsultations, for example, has found its way into the German health care system. However, the practicability and the benefit of robot-assisted postoperative visits have not been systematically investigated in any study worldwide. Methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized study comparing the standard postoperative visit with the doctor on call and the digital visit through the Double robot between December 2019 and April 2022. All patients and doctors completed a survey after the visit. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patients' pain, hospitalization time, and patients' opinions about the usefulness of the robot. Likert scales of arithmetic mean, standard deviation, and subgroup analyses with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher's exact test were used to compare outcomes. Results: We enrolled a total of 106 patients: 54 (50.9%) of them underwent the robot visit and 52 (49.1%) underwent the conventional visit. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Our primary outcome was the same in both arms. Similar results were obtained for the secondary endpoints. Conclusion: Robot-televisits were comparable with standard visits including satisfaction, usefulness, and time of hospitalization. Digitalization in medicine is an irreversible process, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope that our study will provide concrete help to encourage the allocation of funds for telemedicine in Germany's health care system.

Adoption Processes of Innovations in Health Systems: The Example of Telemedicine in Germany.

(1) Background: Individual adoption experiences represent important factors in implementing innovations. In the context of health systems, where the implementation of innovations aims to improve the quality of care, they provide an important basis for developing and adapting implementation strategies. (2) Methods: This study examines the adoption experiences of (tele-)medical experts (n = 13) using the example of telemedicine in the German healthcare system by means of a qualitative, guideline-based interview study. The interview guide, as well as the deductive-inductive analysis, is based on Rogers' adoption theory. The transcription and analysis process was carried out according to Kuckartz. (3) Results: A total of 304 interview statements could be coded and assigned to the five main categories of persuasion, knowledge, implementation, decision and confirmation. More than half of all statements were coded under the main category persuasion, with its subcategories of convictions regarding the implementation of telemedicine (n = 89), international comparison of Germany's development (n = 50), telemedicine as a way of optimizing resources (n = 22) and conviction to understand telemedicine as an overall system (n = 10). (4) Conclusions: This study provides insight into how the implementation of telemedicine in the German healthcare system is perceived by experts and allows for adjustments to the ongoing implementation strategy.

Veterinarians' perspective on telemedicine in Germany.

Information on the use of telemedical approaches in the context of veterinary medicine is evolving. As in human medicine, veterinary medicine is subject to an increasing digitalization effort. The aim of the current study was to investigate the perspective of German veterinarians regarding their awareness and usage of telemedical approaches. Furthermore, the degree of implementation of different digital approaches in the context of German veterinary medicine was elaborated. A literature review, that also aimed to address the necessary framework or standardization of these digitalization efforts and potential barriers such as legal or infrastructural aspects, provided information for the empirical research. Using a quantitative research approach, the perspective of German veterinarians was surveyed. In total, responses from 169 veterinarians were analyzed. The results show that digital approaches were used by veterinarians and the usage was enhanced by the COVID-19 crisis. However, the lack of a clear legal framework may be a significant barrier for further implementation. This survey provides a basis for a critical discussion on the use of veterinary telemedicine in Germany. The results may contribute to future strategies for the implementation and development of necessary policies, training, and service applications within Germany, which may be transferable for the profession in other countries.

Sleep telemedicine in Germany: a developed model

Sleep telemedicine in Germany: a developed model

AB0707 RHEUMATOLOGY PATIENT CARE IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: TELEMEDICINE, DELEGATION, PATIENT SATISFACTION AND VACCINATION BEHAVIOUR

Background:Use of telemedicine in Germany has increased due to the COVID-19 lockdown. Between March and May 2020, government restrictions led to cancellation of routine outpatient appointments to limit viral spread and optimize resources.Objectives:This study assesses patient satisfaction of follow-up telemedicine appointments among patients known to be in disease remission, attending either secondary or tertiary care Rheumatology clinics. Appointments were conducted either by a rheumatologist or a qualified medical assistant for rheumatology (RFA). Additional data regarding perceived concerns arising from the COVID-19 pandemic as well as attitudes to vaccination were collected.Methods:Methods: Patients not requiring adjustment of their DMARDs at the two previous attendances were considered stable. At cancellation of the planned attendance, patients were offered participation in the study and provided verbal informed consent. Participants were randomized to a telemedicine appointment by either a physician or RFA. Telemedicine appointments consisted of a standardized patient interview, including assessment of disease activity (modified CDAI score), attitudes to vaccination as well as current vaccine status and concerns about COVID-19. Following participation, all patients received a pseudonymized postal questionnaire to evaluate appointment satisfaction (FAPI-Score).Results:In total 112/116 (96%) patients that were offered appointments, participated in the study (RA 50%, axSpA 30%, PsA 20%). Of these 88/112 (79%) returned their postal questionnaires. Overall patient satisfaction was excellent (mean 4.3/5 modified FAPI score) and did not differ between care setting or clinical status of the interviewer. RFAs conducted 19/112 (17%) of appointments, 6 (32%) of which required additional physician intervention. Change of DMARDs occurred in 19/112 (17%) appointments. Patients reporting a pain score ≥7 (VAS 1-10) were most dissatisfied with the telemedicine appointment (p=0.036). Concerns about COVID-19 correlated with disease activity: high disease activity (p = 0.031), presence of tender joints (p=0.001), high pain levels (p=0.009) correlated with concern of contracting COVID-19 or experiencing severe disease course. Only 38% of the patients had been vaccinated against pneumococci in the past 5 years and 54% had been vaccinated against influenza in 2019/2020.Conclusion:Telemedicine can contribute to patient care in stable patients. RFAs can also contribute to patient care especially for follow-up appointment when patients are in remission. Vaccination rates and motivation needs to be improved as influenza and pneumococcal vaccination is recommended to all patients with rheumatic diseases without contraindications.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Defining Telemedicine and Engaging Future Medical Practitioners. Comment on "Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey".

Defining Telemedicine and Engaging Future Medical Practitioners. Comment on "Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey".

독일 원격의료 합법화와 법개정 논의

독일 원격의료 합법화와 법개정 논의

Telemedicine in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multi-Professional National Survey.

BackgroundIn an effort to contain the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems worldwide implemented telemedical solutions to overcome staffing, technical, and infrastructural limitations. In Germany, a multitude of telemedical systems are already being used, while new approaches are rapidly being developed in response to the crisis. However, the extent of the current implementation within different health care settings, the user’s acceptance and perception, as well as the hindering technical and regulatory obstacles remain unclear.ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to assess the current status quo of the availability and routine use of telemedical solutions, user acceptance, and the subjectively perceived burdens on telemedical approaches. Furthermore, we seek to assess the perception of public information quality among professional groups and their preferred communication channels.MethodsA national online survey was conducted on 14 consecutive days in March and April 2020, and distributed to doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in the German language.ResultsA total of 2827 medical professionals participated in the study. Doctors accounted for 65.6% (n=1855) of the professionals, 29.5% (n=833) were nursing staff, and 4.9% (n=139) were identified as others such as therapeutic staff. A majority of participants rated the significance of telemedicine within the crisis as high (1065/2730, 39%) or neutral (n=720, 26.4%); however, there were significant differences between doctors and nurses (P=.01) as well as between the stationary sector compared to the ambulatory sector (P<.001). Telemedicine was already in routine use for 19.6% (532/2711) of German health care providers and in partial use for 40.2% (n=1090). Participants working in private practices (239/594, 40.2%) or private clinics (23/59, 39.0%) experienced less regulatory or technical obstacles compared to university hospitals (586/1190, 49.2%). A majority of doctors rated the public information quality on COVID-19 as good (942/1855, 50.8%) or very good (213/1855, 11.5%); nurses rated the quality of public information significantly lower (P<.001). Participant’s age negatively correlated with the perception of telemedicine’s significance (ρ=–0.23; P<.001).ConclusionsTelemedicine has a broad acceptance among German medical professionals. However, to establish telemedical structures within routine care, technical and regulatory burdens must be overcome.

Long-Term Future of Telemedicine in Germany: The Patient’s, Physician’s, and Payer’s Perspective

While the near-term future of telemedicine development in Germany is quite clear, the long-term future has not been investigated. To determine telemedicine's long-term future in Germany, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 key decision-makers in the German healthcare system. Interviewees included payers, doctors and their professional associations; and patients and their organizations. These individuals were asked what their expectations were in the application of telemedicine. According to the interviewees, several changes in the healthcare system as a whole will occur, which influence telemedicine. These include increase in cost pressure; the changing role of the payers and companies--as opposed to public organizations--playing a more active role in managing care. Physicians foresee more changes than payers do. Patients expect telemedicine to strengthen their role as patients. Most important telemedicine applications will be the "Gesundheitskarte" (a smart card enabling access to patient records), telemedicine as an enabling technology for other provider integration models, information systems for patients, and telemonitoring. The future looks promising for telemedicine in Germany.

Telemedical projects in Bavaria—what is the current position and what needs to be done?

Despite various developments in the field of telemedicine, Bavaria lacks an actual and structured overview of current trends and perspectives from the viewpoint of project managers. The study presented here set out primarily to encompass the various directions such projects are taking that are linked to Bavarian institutions. To this end initiators, participants and target groups were identified, key focal points circumscribed and future measures outlined. A postal survey was carried out among the managers of the 102 designated projects. The survey encompassed the geographical picture and the key project areas, classified according to ‘teleconsultation’, ‘teletherapy’, ‘e-documentation’, ‘telemonitoring/early diagnosis’, ‘information systems’ and ‘tele-education/e-learning’. The majority of the projects, mostly part-funded from an array of the institutions' own resources, were aimed at out-patient care, and accompanied by an evaluation. Special attention was given to managers' evaluation of the specific contributions of their projects to healthcare, conceptually grouped as follows: ‘benefit for doctors’, ‘benefit for patients’, ‘marketing’, ‘integration of healthcare’, ‘efficiency’ and ‘resources’. Relevant in this context too were views on what potentially innovative fields can advance the expansion of telemedicine in Germany—for instance, ‘working environment integration’, ‘acceptance doctors’, ‘technical standards’, ‘payment regulations’, ‘law regulations’, ‘user instruction’, ‘acceptance patients/citizens’. Independent of the evaluation, a wide majority of project managers envisaged telemedicine's growing relevance in the health service.

Teleradiologie mit DICOM E-mail: Empfehlungen der @GIT

E-mail is ideal for ad-hoc connections in teleradiology. The DICOM standard offers the possibility to append DICOM data types as a MIME attachment to any e-mail, thus ensuring the transmission of the original DICOM data. Nevertheless, there are additional requirements (e.g. protection of data privacy) which must be obeyed. Because of the lack of given standards which would grant interoperability as well as manufacturer independence, teleradiology has not been established in Germany until today. Therefore, the IT-Team (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Informationstechnologie, @GIT) of the Radiological Society of Germany (Deutsche Rontgengesellschaft, DRG) set up an initiative to standardise telemedicine by using e-mail. Its members agreed that an e-mail-based variant would be the most practicable way to a communication solution -- as easy to implement as to use. In their opinion, e-mail represents the smallest common denominator for a safe data interchange that would fulfill the legal advantages for telemedicine in Germany.

Telemedicine: interaction between clinic and general practice

The rapid development of information and communication technologies has led to a change of many practical aspects of professional and private life. These technologies also influence interactions between hospitals and outpatient units. This paper provides an overview over current telemedical developments with effects on interactions between in- and outpatient units. Probably the most important application of telemedicine in Germany is not distant patient care but an improved communication structure between different health care providers. Candidates for first routine applications are electronic medical reports and teleconsultations. The widespread use of telemedicine will be accompanied by an increased standardisation in medicine.

Telemedicine in Germany.

Telemedicine in Germany.