Telehealth Services Research Articles

Adoption and Utilization of Telemedicine and Digital Health Services among Older Adults in Israel

Abstract Background As the population ages and the prevalence of long-term diseases rises, telecare is being used increasingly frequently to aid elderly people. Aims We aimed to explore the usage and adoption of 3 types of telehealth services among the senior population in Israel- prior, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic rise in Israel. Methods We explored the usage characteristics of older adults (age 65 and above) belonging to ‘Clalit’, in the use of three types of telehealth services: digital services for administrative tasks, synchronous ‘online visits’ with the patient’s personal physician during clinic business hours, and ‘afterhours’ consultations during evenings, nights, and weekends. The data was collected and analyzed throughout three distinct time periods in Israel: before the COVID-19 pandemic, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and following the COVID-19 ‘peak’. Results Data of 618850 patients who met the inclusion criteria was extracted. Telehealth services utilized for administrative purposes were the most popular. The older population significantly increased their use of all types of telehealth services during the COVID-19 period, and in the majority of types, this usage decreased after the COVID-19 peak, but to a level that was higher than the baseline level prior to the COVID-19 period. Prior to the COVID-19 period, 23.1% of the study population used ‘online visits’, and 2.2% used ‘afterhours’ consultations, at least once. The percentage of usage for these services increased during the COVID-19 period to 59.2% and 5.0%, and then decreased during the third period to 39.5% and 2.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multiple patient variables have been found to be associated with the use of the different telehealth services, in each time-period. Conclusions The senior population uses telehealth services, and can increase their consumption, when they are needed. Suitable and straightforward telehealth solutions tailored for this population should be created. Key messages • The senior population uses telehealth services, and can increase their consumption, when they are needed. • Suitable and straightforward telehealth solutions tailored for this population should be created.

Digital Health Interventions’ Impact on Health Literacy: A Systematic Review

Abstract In the digital era, health literacy is crucial for informed health decisions and outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in enhancing health literacy, as defined by the World Health Organization. We included a variety of studies, such as cross-sectional studies, surveys, and case reports, focusing on interventions like mobile health apps, online platforms, and telehealth services. Our search, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, spanned databases like PubMed, IEEE, and ACM, covering publications from 2013 to 2023. From 1,029 initial articles, 58 met our inclusion criteria after rigorous screening and duplicates removal. Our findings highlight that DHIs, including multimedia tools and remote sessions, significantly bolster health literacy across diverse populations. However, the impact varies due to the digital divide, influenced by factors like age and socioeconomic status. This review underscores the potential of DHIs in public health and the necessity to address accessibility to reduce health disparities. The full synthesis of data and methodological details will be discussed in the presentation, aiming to guide future digital health strategies and policies. Key messages • Digital Interventions Enhance Health Literacy Across Diverse Populations. • Addressing the Digital Divide to Ensure Equitable Access to Health Benefits.

Barriers and challenges to telemedicine usage among the elderly population in Israel

Abstract Background Despite the challenges to its adoption, telemedicine is becoming more and more popular for helping elderly people preserve their independence and continue to live in their own homes. Aims We investigated the challenges and barriers experienced by the elderly population when using telemedicine services in Israel. Methods Fourteen elderly people were recruited for the study and interviewed in person using a semi structured interview protocol, using a qualitative technique. Participants’ replies were evaluated and analyzed thematically. The participants were questioned regarding their usage of telehealth services, the benefits they perceive in them, any potential difficulties to use, and suggestions they had for making these services more readily available and simpler to use for the elderly. Results Most participants recognized the advantages of telehealth services, particularly for the elderly population during pandemics and normal times. However, most of them also expressed various challenges that face the elderly population in using these services. Many participants were concerned that the quality of telemedicine sessions may not be good enough compared to in-person sessions, and expressed a lack of confidence in telemedicine services, and frustration from the absence of in person interaction. Many participants highlighted the technological challenges in the use of computers and applications in general and in the context of healthcare, in particular, in addition to physiological and literacy difficulties. Finally, the participants suggested several ways to increase the accessibility and usage of telemedicine solutions by elderly people. Conclusions A proactive approach to identifying and resolving telehealth barriers can maximize virtual interactions for the older population and alleviate care inequities. There is a need to increase awareness of the availability, benefits, and uses of each telehealth service in comparison to in-person consultations. Key messages • A proactive approach to identifying and resolving telehealth barriers can maximize virtual interactions for the older population and alleviate care inequities. • There is a need to increase awareness of the availability, benefits, and uses of each telehealth service in comparison to in-person consultations.

Recommendations for permanent sleep telehealth: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement.

Telehealth use greatly expanded under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) waivers at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the uncertainty and limitations of continued coverage risks loss of this momentum. Permanent coverage with adequate reimbursement is essential for the long-term acceptance and expansion of telehealth services. Telehealth supports both the current and future need for sleep health management by expanding patient access, increasing clinician efficiency, improving patient safety, and addressing health care equity. Sleep medicine is an ideal field for telehealth due to limited provider access, safety concerns with sleepy patients, availability of remote patient monitoring for treatment management, and the minimal need for repeated physical examinations. Telehealth is non-inferior for delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and can enhance obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment adherence. It is the position of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) that telehealth is an essential tool for the provision of high quality, patient-centered care for patients with sleep disorders. We encourage all stakeholders including legislators, policymakers, clinicians, and patients to work together to address payment models, interstate care, technology access, prescribing practices, and ongoing research to ensure that sleep telehealth services are permanently available and accessible for all patients seeking sleep medicine care.

Investigating patient satisfaction with a hand therapy telehealth service during COVID-19.

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient hand therapy services were restricted. The use of telehealth was adopted to continue to provide care to patients with hand injuries. This survey aims to investigate patient satisfaction with hand therapy delivered via telehealth in a NSW public tertiary referral metropolitan setting and explore whether this differs for specific hand injury/conditions and treatments offered. Patients using hand therapy services via telehealth between 28 June 2021 and 27 May 2022 responded to a bespoke electronic survey. Participants were grouped depending on their particular injury/condition and treatment received. Analysis was conducted using MS Excel, and correlations were determined by using Fisher's exact test. No consumers were involved in the study design or analysis. Sixty-eight of 262 patients responded to the survey (26% response rate). Overall results showed high patient satisfaction (n = 55, 81%) with hand therapy delivered via telehealth with most patients agreeing that telehealth should be offered going forward (n = 59, 87%). Benefits reported by patients included convenience, reduced travel time and parking issues, and time saving. Patients receiving therapy for 'finger thumb bony injury with K wires' demonstrated a statistically significant association of lower satisfaction with telehealth (n = 3, 43%, P = 0.02). Patients receiving wound care over telehealth were just as satisfied with their experience (n = 15, 82%) as overall results (n = 55, 81%). The survey suggests that patients are satisfied with their experience of telehealth for hand therapy. Patients with finger thumb bony injuries with k wires may be less suitable for telehealth. Wound care appears to be well received over telehealth in a hand therapy population. There is little evidence to guide hand therapists in which conditions or injuries patients find can be managed well with telehealth. Patients who answered a survey about their experience with telehealth for their hand therapy management overall reported satisfaction with the experience. Some patients had undergone surgery for broken fingers and thumbs using wires to hold the bone together while it healed. These patients were less likely to find telehealth satisfactory for their hand therapy care. Most patients requiring wound care over telehealth found this satisfactory.

Barriers and Willingness to Continue Using Telehealth Services Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspectives of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in Australia: A Mixed-Method Study.

Patient demand for oral and maxillofacial telehealth services increased during COVID-19. To explore the potential for their continued use post-COVID-19, an assessment was conducted by examining the association between the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics of consultants and the perceived facilitators and barriers influencing their future intent. Practicing oral and maxillofacial consultants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected through surveys and key informant interviews. Chi-square tests were used to determine whether consultants' clinical and socio-demographic characteristics and perceptions were associated with a willingness to use telehealth in the future. Coded interview transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify the main themes influencing their willingness. Among the 42 respondents, 82% expressed a willingness to continue using telehealth services with the majority having at least 2 to 3 years (p = 0.028) of experience utilizing these services. The four main themes impacting consultants willingness include the accessibility of oral and maxillofacial healthcare, challenges addressing patient needs, the uncertainty of diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness as a post-operation observation tool. Most oral and maxillofacial consultants favored the routine use of telehealth services beyond COVID-19. Concern for patients' needs was a key determinant of their continued use. Co-designing strategies to eliminate barriers and unmet needs for consultants and patients may improve oral and maxillofacial telehealth uptake.

Statistical Analysis of Telehealth Use and Pre- and Postpandemic Insurance Coverage in Selected Health Care Specialties in a Large Health Care System in Arkansas: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered policy changes in 2020 that allowed insurance companies to reimburse telehealth services, leading to increased telehealth use, especially in rural and underserved areas. However, with many emergency rules ending in 2022, patients and health care providers face potential challenges in accessing these services. This study analyzed telehealth use across specialties in Arkansas before and after the pandemic (2017-2022) using data from electronic medical records from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center. We explored trends in insurance coverage for telehealth visits and developed metrics to compare the performance of telehealth versus in-person visits across various specialties. The results inform insurance coverage decisions for telehealth services. We used pre- and postpandemic data to determine the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in reimbursement policies on telehealth visits. We proposed a framework to calculate 3 appointment metrics: indirect waiting time, direct waiting time, and appointment length. Statistical analysis tools were used to compare the performance of telehealth and in-person visits across the following specialties: obstetrics and gynecology, psychiatry, family medicine, gerontology, internal medicine, neurology, and neurosurgery. We used data from approximately 4 million in-person visits and 300,000 telehealth visits collected from 2017 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in telehealth visits across all specialties (P<.001), showing an 89% increase from 51,589 visits in 2019 to 97,461 visits in 2020, followed by a 21% increase to 117,730 visits in 2021. Around 92.57% (134,221/145,001) of telehealth patients from 2020 to 2022 were covered by Medicare, Blue Cross and Blue Shield, commercial and managed care, Medicaid, and Medicare Managed Care. In-person visits covered by Medicare and Medicaid decreased by 15%, from 313,196 in 2019 to 264,696 in 2022. During 2020 to 2022, about 22.84% (33,123/145,001) of total telehealth visits during this period were covered by Medicare and 53.58% (86,317/161,092) were in psychiatry, obstetrics and gynecology, and family medicine. We noticed a statistically significant decrease (P<.001) in the average indirect waiting time for telehealth visits, from 48.4 to 27.7 days, and a statistically significant reduction in appointment length, from 93.2 minutes in 2020 to 39.59 minutes in 2022. The indirect waiting time for psychiatry telehealth visits was almost 50% shorter than that for in-person visits. These findings highlight the potential benefits of telehealth in providing access to health care, particularly for patients needing psychiatric care. Reverting to prepandemic regulations could negatively affect Arkansas, where many live in underserved areas. Our analysis shows that telehealth use remained stable beyond 2020, with psychiatry visits continuing to grow. These findings may guide insurance and policy decisions in Arkansas and other regions facing similar access challenges.

Enhancing endometriosis care with telehealth: Opportunities and challenges.

Endometriosis affects a significant portion of women during their reproductive years, causing substantial pain and impacting their quality of life. Telehealth services have emerged as a promising avenue for enhancing endometriosis care, especially in the post-COVID-19 era. For endometriosis patients, who often require frequent appointments and specialized care, telehealth offers a convenient and accessible solution, particularly for addressing pain management and interdisciplinary concerns. Despite the challenges posed by the lack of physical examinations in telehealth, studies show that it can be a viable option for endometriosis care. Integrating telehealth with in-person visits for initial assessments can build trust and ensure comprehensive care delivery. Moreover, telehealth facilitates collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, including gynecologists, psychologists, and physiotherapists, to provide holistic treatment plans addressing physical, psychological, and interpersonal aspects of endometriosis. Here, we explore the potential benefits of telehealth in managing endometriosis, highlighting its role in providing comprehensive, multidisciplinary care while overcoming barriers like diagnostic delays and limited access to specialists. Further research and integration of telehealth into routine practice are warranted to maximize its benefits and address the complex challenges associated with endometriosis management.

Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Telehealth Provision at the Beginning, During, and Latter Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: This study aims to determine how obstetrician-gynecologists provided telehealth from January 2020 to December 2022 in the United States, using de-identified commercial insurance data from FAIR Health. It also explores the trends in telehealth provision by physicians' age, gender, and by state policies on telehealth payment parity. Methods: Aggregated, de-identified data derived from medical claims containing 450,588 physician-quarter observations during 2020 to 2022 were analyzed using descriptive methods to examine the total number of telehealth services to pregnant individuals provided, the number of obstetrician-gynecologists that provided telehealth, and the mean number of telehealth services provided per quarter. Results: Obstetrician-gynecologists' telehealth provision increased rapidly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, reaching its peak during the winter 2020 wave (fourth quarter) during which 4,663 obstetrician-gynecologists provided 13,846 telehealth visits. This was followed by a drop in subsequent quarters and during the fourth quarter of 2022, about 9,500 visits were provided by 2,800 obstetrician-gynecologists. Mean number of telehealth visits per physician was higher among older obstetrician-gynecologists and among those that practiced in states that adapted telehealth payment parity policies. Conclusions: Physician sex, age, and the state of practice location impacted their telehealth provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future policies aimed at ensuring telehealth access for pregnant people should consider these factors.

Telehealth versus face-to-face delivery of speech language pathology services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is an increasing demand for the provision of speech language pathology (SLP) services via telehealth. Therefore, we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing telehealth to face-to-face provision of SLP services. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane, clinical trial registries, and conducted a citation analysis to identify trials. We included randomized trials comparing similar care delivered live via telehealth (phone or video), to face-to-face. Primary outcomes included: % syllables stuttered (%SS) (for individuals who stutter); change in sound pressure levels monologue (for individuals with Parkinson's disease); and key function scores (for other areas). Where data were sufficient, mean differences were calculated. Nine randomized controlled trials were included; eight evaluated video and one evaluated phone telehealth. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear, excepting blinding. There were no significant differences at any time-point up to 18 months for %SS (mean difference, MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6, p = 0.70). For people with Parkinson's disease, there was no difference between groups in change in sound pressure levels (monologue) (MD 0.6, 95% CI -1.2 to 2.5, p = 0.49). Four trials investigated interventions for speech sound disorder, voice disorder and post-stroke dysphagia and aphasia; they found no differences between telehealth service delivery and face-to-face delivery. Evidence suggests that the telehealth provision of SLP services may be a viable alternative to their provision face-to-face, particularly to people who stutter and people with Parkinson's disease. The key limitation is the small number of randomized controlled trials, as well as evidence on the quality of life, well-being and satisfaction and economic outcomes.

Exploring medical students’ perceptions of telehealth in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study

IntroductionThis study aimed to investigate medical students’ perceptions of telehealth in Pakistan and assess the relationship between students’ proficiency in computers and technology, gender, and age.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 330 medical students from various universities in Karachi, Pakistan. Data on demographic characteristics, computer proficiency, and perceptions of telehealth were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were utilized for data analysis.ResultsThe study included 330 participants, predominantly from public universities (83.3%), with a mean age of 21.40 ± 4.24 years. Most participants were pursuing MBBS (67%). In terms of computer proficiency, 41.8% fell into the middle category. Gender correlated significantly with proficiency (p < 0.05), with females more often in the middle category and males in the not-that-amateur category. Age demonstrated a small positive correlation with proficiency (p < 0.05). A majority (77.6%) expressed a general interest in technology. Regarding healthcare apps, 51.8% had 1–3 apps, and 33.6% had none. Most participants believed telehealth would enhance healthcare (72.1%) and make it cheaper (63.3%). Additionally, 56.7% agreed that Pakistan should invest in telehealth, while only 2.7% disagreed.ConclusionThe study revealed that medical students in Pakistan exhibit an interest in technology and perceive telehealth as beneficial. These findings suggest that telehealth holds the potential to enhance healthcare opportunities in Pakistan. Therefore, investing in and expanding telehealth services may represent a viable solution for improving access to healthcare in the country.

8469 Endocrinologists Underutilize Virtual Care Services Resulting in Suboptimal Clinical and Financial Outcomes

Abstract Disclosure: D. Terry: Employee; Self; Valendo Health. Less than 150,000 Medicare patients with diabetes (PWD) receive billable telehealth and remote monitoring services, even though over 12 million PWDs are eligible for these services. This is a missed quality opportunity, as studies show that PWDs who receive these services experience reductions in A1C levels and improvements in TIR. It is also a missed financial opportunity for Endocrinologists, who are among the lowest paid specialists in the US. The economics of Endocrinology are important, because inadequate compensation is leading to access constraints when the diabetes population is growing, and care complexity is increasing. We analyzed billed virtual health claims for every Medicare PWD in 2022. The types of services we examined included: Chronic Care Management (CCM &amp; PCM), Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM &amp; RPM), Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT), and Diabetes Self-Management Training (DSMT). When we looked by Endocrinologist by virtual care service type, we found the following levels of service delivery for Endocrinologists at the median levels of utilization:4.8% of eligible PWDs received remote Continuous Glucose Monitoring support.4.2% received virtual Chronic Care Management services.6.2% received virtual Diabetes Self-Management Support.&amp;lt;1% received Medical Nutrition Therapy This is clearly a missed clinical quality opportunity as a study published in JAMA in October 2023, Comprehensive Telehealth Model to Support Diabetes Self-Management, reported the following improvements for PWDs who received virtual care for 6 months:Mean change in A1C levels: Type 1: -0.6%; Type 2: -1.0%Mean TIR Improvement: Type 1: 16%; Type 2: 18% It is also a missed financial opportunity for Endocrinology practices. Each patient with diabetes is potentially eligible for $100 or more of virtual care services per month. We’ve looked at every Endocrinology practice in the US and many are missing out on over a million dollars of annual revenue opportunity. This is important as Endocrinology organizations everywhere, independent and hospital based, are struggling to retain the doctors &amp; staff necessary to provide adequate access to care - leading to months of wait time to see an Endocrinologist. The prevalence of diabetes is growing significantly, while Endocrinologist capacity is shrinking. Value added and billable virtual care services create new opportunities for Endocrinologist to generate the revenue necessary to increase clinical capacity and improve access by creating diverse clinical teams led by Endocrinologists and supported by Diabetes Educators, Dietitians, and others with expertise in diabetes who can care for many more PWDs. Creating virtual care capabilities is also an early step in moving Endocrinology into Value-Based Care arrangements that reward providers for improving care and reducing costs rather than for generating more visits. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Patient-Centered Cost Saving and Positive Environmental Impact With the Introduction of Telehealth Services at a Single Center.

To establish the patient-specific cost and time savings associated with telemedicine with the secondary environmental benefits of virtual visits within a tertiary referral center sub-specialty urology clinic. An electronic health record query was made of all urology telehealth visits that have occurred between October 4, 2020 and October 10, 2020 at a single academic center. We evaluated the cost of travel for an in-person visit based on zip code data. To adjust for productivity loss, the cost of missed work was added as either full day or half day-based distance and average compensation per day based on zip code data. Environmental impact was calculated using average CO2 emissions per mile not traveled. There were 6444 patients seen in the urology clinic via telehealth during the 6-month period. Urology patients traveled on average 69 ± 148 miles round-trip for an appointment. The average cost savings per patient including the cost of the gas and time away from work was $152.78 ± $105.90. Overall, over a 6-month period, the total cost savings was $984,534.73 for the 6444 patients seen via telemedicine. There was also a significant environmental impact of the decreased travel burden with 153.36 metric tons of CO2 emissions eliminated. With the implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients have been able to save a substantial amount of time and money primarily driven by the decreasing work hours lost and cost of travel.

Comparing the trends of MBS telepsychiatry and consultant physician telehealth services from 2017 to 2022: A retrospective study.

The Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) telehealth items were expanded in March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured the use of MBS telepsychiatry items compared to consultant physician telehealth items within the context of these item changes, to understand differences in telepsychiatry and physician telehealth utilisation. Monthly counts of face-to-face and telehealth (videoconferencing and telephone) MBS items for psychiatrists and physicians from January 2017 to December 2022 were compiled from Services Australia MBS Item Reports. Usage levels were compared before and after telehealth item expansion. Usage trends for MBS telepsychiatry and physician telehealth items were compared in time-series plots. Telehealth item expansion resulted in a greater rise of telepsychiatry services from 3.8% beforehand to 43.8% of total services subsequently, compared with physician telehealth services (from 0.6% to 20.0%). More physician telehealth services were by telephone compared with telepsychiatry services. Time-series of both telehealth services displayed similar patterns until mid-2022, when physician telehealth services declined as telephone items were restricted. Telepsychiatry services consistently comprised a greater proportion of total services than physician telehealth services. MBS psychiatrist services showed a more substantial and persistent shift to telehealth than physician services, suggesting a greater preference and use of telepsychiatry.

The impact of COVID-19 on time toxicity in patients with advanced cancer.

267 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid adoption of telemedicine but little is known about whether the changes in care delivery has led to differences in time toxicity for patients with advanced cancer. This study examines the impact of the pandemic on time toxicity, defined as the time burden of interacting with the healthcare system, by comparing healthcare contact days between pre-COVID and post-COVID periods. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with advanced (stage 4) cancer who died within one year of diagnosis at Kaiser Permanente Northern California between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2023. Time toxicity was defined as the percentage of healthcare contact days over the course of survival period between cancer diagnosis and death (contact days/survival days). We included outpatient days (imaging, labs, treatment, provider visits), inpatient stays (emergency department, acute inpatient, non-acute institutional stays), and in-home days (in-home care, virtual care, home hospice). Differences between pre-COVID (diagnosed and died before March 1, 2020) and post-COVID (diagnosed after March 1, 2020) periods were analyzed using Wilcoxon tests. Results: The cohort included 9643 patients, with 6558 pre-COVID and 3085 post-COVID. Median age at diagnosis was 74 years, and the cohort was 46.9% female, largely white (64.5%), with a high comorbidity score (median Elixhauser score: 4). Post-COVID, there was an increase in institutional stay (8.7% vs. 9.3%) and outpatient service (imaging and labs) (4.4% vs. 3.1%), while in-person outpatient visits decreased (5.9% vs. 8.7%, p&lt;0.0001). Additionally, in-home days increased (25.0% vs. 20.8%), with a significant rise in in-home virtual care (3.9% vs. 1.8%, all p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to notable shifts in healthcare utilization for patients with advanced cancer in the last year of life. The increase in telehealth and in-home services in the post-COVID era was accompanied by a slight increase in emergency and ancillary services. Further understanding patient experiences around these shifts is crucial for optimizing care and managing time toxicity in the evolving healthcare landscape. Description of outcomes pre and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Total Pre-COVID Post-COVID P-value Survival Days, median 86.0 84.0 89.0 0.02 Percentage of Contact, median (interquartile range) Comprehensive Contact 63.3 (41.0-92.0) 62.5 (40.7-91.0) 65.2 (41.7-94.1) 0.01 Institutional stay 9.0 (2.7-26.2) 8.7 (2.7-25.9) 9.3 (2.9-26.8) 0.11 Outpatient 12.4 (5.3-19.8) 12.9 (5.6-20.6) 11.2 (4.8-18.1) &lt;.001 Outpatient visit 7.7 (2.8-13.4) 8.7 (3.5-14.6) 5.9 (1.6-10.7) &lt;.0001 Outpatient service 3.5 (0.8-6.3) 3.1 (0.4-5.8) 4.4 (1.5-7.1) &lt;.0001 In-home 22.2 (7.4-50.0) 20.8 (6.0-48.4) 25.0 (10.4-51.7) &lt;.001 In-home care 18.1 (1.7-46.6) 17.4 (1.2-46.2) 19.2 (2.4-47.2) 0.03 In-home virtual care 2.2 (0.0-4.8) 1.8 (0.0-3.8) 3.9 (0.7-7.0) &lt;.0001

Association of area-level broadband and non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis and guideline-concordant care in the US.

96 Background: Access to broadband is a social determinant of health facilitating connections with healthcare services and other resources and alleviating burdens of travel distance, time, and cost. We used nationwide data to examine the association of zip code-level broadband usage and stage at diagnosis, as well as the receipt of quality care among individuals newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Individuals ≥18 years newly diagnosed with first primary NSCLC between April - December of 2019-2021, were identified from the National Cancer Database (January - March were excluded to match the COVID-19 timeframe in 2020). Broadband usage percentage (the percentage of individuals per zip code with access to fixed broadband at speeds of 25 Mbps/3 Mbps in 2020) were combined with the cohort based on individual’s residential zip code. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between broadband usage quartiles and stage at diagnosis, as well as the receipt of guideline-concordant care based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, including surgery and radiation, ≥10 lymph nodes sampling, chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACR). Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by metropolitan status and year, adjusting for age group, sex, race and ethnicity, comorbidity, distance to facility, state, and zip code-level social deprivation index (SDI). Results: Cohort included 305,198 individuals newly diagnosed with NSCLC. Individuals living in areas with the highest broadband usage were more likely to be aged 65-74 years, female, non-Hispanic White, with Medicare coverage, living in metropolitan and low SDI areas. In adjusted models, individuals living in areas with the highest broadband usage were more likely to be diagnosed with stage I NSCLC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.01-1.20) and to receive guideline-concordant NACR (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.09-1.73) compared with those living in areas with the lowest broadband usage in 2020. When stratified by metropolitan status, associations of broadband and diagnosis and receipt of NACR were only observed among individuals living in non-metropolitan areas with medium-low and medium-high broadband usage, respectively (AOR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.01-1.32; AOR = 1.80, 95%CI = 1.25-2.58). No significant associations were identified for other care modalities or during 2019 and 2021. Conclusions: Increased access to broadband usage is associated with earlier stage NSCLC diagnosis and receiving guideline-concordant NACR in 2020. Our results suggest that increased broadband access, combined with the expansion of telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, may have improved telehealth utilization throughout 2020, leading to enhanced quality of cancer care, particularly benefiting individuals residing in non-metropolitan areas.

Embracing technological innovations in healthcare: An evaluation of a newly implemented dietetic telehealth service and strategies to improve technology acceptance and experience of patients and staff in Hong kong

Embracing technological innovations in healthcare: An evaluation of a newly implemented dietetic telehealth service and strategies to improve technology acceptance and experience of patients and staff in Hong kong

General practitioners' experiences delivering essential care services during the 2020 and 2021 COVID-19-related lockdowns.

The UK provided guidance for general practitioners (GPs) to deliver essential care services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to describe local GP experiences and approaches to delivering care while similar formal guidance in Australia was unavailable. Two hundred and ninety-one GPs who practised during the March 2020 to December 2021 COVID-19 lockdowns in Melbourne and Sydney undertook an electronic survey exploring perceptions of essential care service delivery. The provision of care by Australian practices was compared to UK Royal College of General Practitioners' recommendations. Of 274 completed surveys, Australian GP practices were 60% concordant with UK guideline recommendations. There was a large shift towards telehealth service provision across the board, from diagnosis to follow-up. Most care continued if it was deliverable through telehealth or had urgent or time-sensitive need. Local guidance for delivery of essential care services should be developed for future calamities, informed by GPs' experience practising during the COVID 19 pandemic and considering Australian contextual factors.

Obstacles and enablers for using telehealth services online in nursing practice: A systematic review

Background: Comprehensive reporting on the barriers and enablers to telehealth adoption in industrialized nations has identified a wide range of significant factors. We aimed to get the important research information on the elements that nurses found most beneficial and hindering when using online telehealth services for nursing practice, we conducted a systematic review study. Method: This systematic review study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA principles. We searched for articles that discussed the aspects of using telehealth services for nursing practicum that nurse practitioners found most helpful and inconvenient. The international electronic databases that were used were Web of Science, Scopus CINAHL, and PubMed. The search was conducted for articles published in the period from 2011 and 2023. Only research that were written in English and published were considered. Results: We considered 7 articles in our systematic review analysis, totaling 3729 participants. Inadequate resources (time, money) were mentioned as barriers relevant to both organizational and patient issues. Negative attitudes, a lack of telehealth experience, and inadequate training and support were considered to be impediments to the use of telehealth (3). According to the findings of the Kleib et al., 2018 study, the following variables affect user competency and proficiency: age; Prerequisites for qualifying include prior knowledge of information technology and a sufficient, early, and continual informatics education. Conclusion: Numerous facilitators and obstracles were identified. In addition to administrative support, health professionals and information technology specialists must come to local agreements when transitioning from traditional face-to-face nursing practice to telehealth utilization.

Designing state-level policies to support independent pharmacies in providing specialty care services in rural regions

This review paper explores the critical role of independent pharmacies in rural regions, emphasizing their potential to deliver specialty care services despite facing significant challenges. These challenges include financial constraints, regulatory barriers, and limited specialized training and resource access. The paper argues that comprehensive state-level policies are necessary to support these pharmacies, enabling them to overcome these obstacles and enhance healthcare access in rural areas. Key policy recommendations include providing financial incentives such as grants and subsidies, regulatory reforms to streamline licensing processes and expand the scope of practice for pharmacists, and promoting partnerships between pharmacies, healthcare providers, and telehealth services. The paper also highlights the importance of integrating independent pharmacies into state health programs and adopting advanced technologies like telepharmacy and electronic health records. Future research directions are suggested, focusing on the impact of digital health technologies and evolving healthcare payment models on independent pharmacies in rural regions. The paper concludes by underscoring the need for targeted policy interventions to strengthen the role of independent pharmacies in rural healthcare, thereby improving health outcomes and quality of life for rural populations.