Tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil Research Articles

Recent efficacy and long-term survival of Astragalus polysaccharide combined with gemcitabine and S-1 in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor with a rapid progression rate and a high susceptibility to infiltration and metastasis. Astragalus polysaccharide (APS), a pure Chinese medicine preparation primarily made from the traditional Chinese herb Astragalus, plays a positive role in the treatment of many malignant tumors. To explore the recent efficacy of APS combined with gemcitabine plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) (GS) regimen in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and assess its effect on the immune function and long-term survival of patients. A total of 97 patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and received GS chemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine) from March 2021 to December 2021 were included in the retrospective analysis. Among them, 41 patients received APS combined with GS chemotherapy, and 56 patients received GS chemotherapy only. The recent efficacy, immune function, adverse reactions, and long-term survival were compared among these patients. After 4 cycles of treatment, the objective response rate of patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS was 51.22%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 56.10%, higher than those of patients receiving the monotherapy with GS alone (30.36% and 35.71%, respectively). Besides, the percentages of CD3+ T cells (50.18% ± 9.57%) and CD4+ T cells (31.52% ± 5.33%) in the peripheral blood of patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS were higher compared with those treated with GS regimen alone [(44.06% ± 8.55%) and (26.01% ± 7.83%), respectively]. Additionally, the incidences of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue in patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS were significantly lower than those in patients receiving the monotherapy of GS alone (17.07%, 9.76%, 31.71% vs 37.50%, 28.57%, 60.71%). Moreover, the median survival time of patients receiving the combined therapy of APS and GS was 394 days, significantly longer than that of patients receiving the monotherapy of GS alone (339 days) (hazard ratio: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.45-0.99; P = 0.036). All these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The combined therapy of APS and GS improved the recent efficacy and long-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and alleviated chemotherapy-induced immune suppression and adverse reactions.

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: 3-year follow-up of the ATTRACTION-4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BackgroundNivolumab + chemotherapy is now a standard of care for HER2-negative, previously untreated, unresectable or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (advanced gastric cancer), but long-term follow-up data of clinical trials are limited.MethodsATTRACTON-4 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Patients were randomized to either nivolumab or placebo, both combined with the physician’s choice of SOX (oral S-1 [tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil potassium] + oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin). We report the primary endpoints—centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)—and landmark analyses of OS among patients alive using 3-year follow-up data.ResultsAt the cutoff date (May 10, 2021), 17/359 patients in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group and 6/358 in the placebo + chemotherapy group were continuing study treatment. PFS (centrally assessed) was longer in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group (median 10.94 vs. 8.48 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.82). Although OS did not differ between the two groups (median 17.45 vs. 17.15 months; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75–1.05), the landmark analysis of OS, calculating HRs at each landmark time point (every month), was getting numerically better in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group over time. Approximately 80% of patients who achieved complete response in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group were alive at 3 years. No new safety signals or major late-onset select treatment-related adverse events were observed for nivolumab + chemotherapy.ConclusionThis 3-year follow-up of ATTRACTION-4 confirmed the long-term clinical benefit and manageable safety of nivolumab + chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer.Trial registrationNCT02746796

Safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF as primary prophylaxis against neutropenia induced by combination chemotherapy regimens involving oral chemotherapy agents in gastrointestinal cancer patients: A prospective, exploratory, non-randomized controlled study.

e24107 Background: The safety and efficacy of PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients undergoing oral chemotherapy remain unclear. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF as primary prophylaxis against CIN in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients receiving combination chemotherapy regimens involving oral chemotherapy agents. Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, exploratory, non-randomized controlled study. GI cancer patients receiving two consecutive cycles of IV oxaliplatin (150mg/m2 on day 1) combined with oral capecitabine 1000mg/m2 or tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule 40-60mg twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. PEG-rhG-CSF (6mg) was administered subcutaneously 24 hours post-oxaliplatin treatment in the PEG-rhG-CSF group, while the control group did not receive it. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included CIN incidence and neutropenic complications. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2100054854). Results: Between March 2022 and January 2023, a total of 49 patients was screened, and 43 patients completed the treatment (26 in PEG-rhG-CSF group and 17 in control group). The average age was 61.4 years, with 90.7% males and 83.7% having gastric cancer. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The overall adverse events (AE) did not differ statistically (88.5% vs. 88.2%, p = 1.000), with grade £2 fatigue and nausea being the most common AEs. Grade 3 platelet reduction showed no significant difference between the two groups (7.69% vs. 17.65%, p = 0.432). Four cases of bone pain (15.4%) and five cases of injection site reactions below grade 3 (19.2%) were observed in the PEG-rhG-CSF group. Grade ≥2 CIN was significantly lower in the PEG-rhG-CSF group (3.84% vs. 58.82%, p &lt; 0.001). One case in the PEG-rhG-CSF group required antibiotic treatment due to febrile neutropenia. Regarding neutropenic complications, the PEG-rhG-CSF group exhibited lower proportion of chemotherapy delay (3.85% vs. 35.29%, p &lt; 0.001) and dose reduction (1.92% vs. 23.53%, p = 0.002). Rescue treatment with rhG-CSF for grade 3/4 CIN was significantly less frequent in the PEG-rhG-CSF group (1.92% vs. 23.53%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in GI cancer patients undergoing oral capecitabine/tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium may be safe, without an increased chemotherapy-related AEs, and is associated with a reduced grade ≥2 CIN. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100054854.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a large-scale data analysis using the Japanese claims database

PurposeThis study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in real-world clinical settings in Japan.MethodsThe treatment patterns, time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), time to treatment discontinuation, adverse events of interest, and medical costs of treating patients with mTNBC in first-, second-, and third-line settings were investigated using data of patients meeting the inclusion criteria between January 2017 and March 2022 in a Japanese medical claims database. The treatment regimens for mTNBC were defined according to the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines.ResultsIn this study, 2236 patients with mTNBC (median age 66.0 years; 99.8% female) were included in the first-line cohort. Of these, 46.6% and 20.8% were included in the second- and third-line cohorts, respectively. The two most frequently used treatments were capecitabine (19.1%) and S-1 (tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil) (14.5%) in the first-line cohort, eribulin (18.3%) and bevacizumab/paclitaxel (14.4%) in the second-line cohort, and eribulin (19.4%) and bevacizumab/paclitaxel (17.5%) in the third-line cohort. The TTNTD shortened as the line of therapy progressed (median 8.0, 6.5, and 5.2 months for the first-, second-, and third-line treatments, respectively). Nausea/vomiting and neutropenia/leukopenia occurred in 62.8% and 18.3% of all patients, respectively. The medical total costs per day were 6.7, 10.2, and 12.9 thousand yen during the first-/second-/third-line treatments, respectively.ConclusionThis study provides insight into current treatment patterns for mTNBC in Japan. The cost–benefit balance worsens with later-line treatment and a high unmet need for mTNBC drug treatment remains.

Recent treatment and prognosis in 643 patients with extramammary Paget's disease.

Information about extramammary Paget's (EMPD) treatment is limited because of the rarity of the disease. The prognosis differs between insitu EMPD and invasive EMPD; therefore, therapy should be planned according to the disease stage. We collected data on 643 EMPD cases treated between 2015 and 2019 in Japan and assessed recent trends in EMPD treatment and prognosis based on the EMPD-oriented TNM staging. Among the 643 patients, 317 had stage 0 (49.3%), 185 had stage I (28.8%), 51 had stage II (7.9%), 18 had stage IIIA (2.8%), 48 had stage IIIB (7.5%) and 24 had stage IV (3.7%) disease. Each stage showed a distinct survival curve, with the exception of stages II and IIIA. Curative surgery was most common in patients with stage 0-III disease. Chemotherapy was the first-line therapy, mainly in patients with stage IIIB and IV disease, most commonly with docetaxel (DTX), followed by DTX + tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium (TS-1) and TS-1. Patients with local disease exhibited a 4.4% recurrence rate. Univariate analysis revealed no prognostic differences according to age, sex or primary tumour site. SLNB was not related to disease-specific survival. In multivariate analysis, female sex significantly predicted local relapse in stage 0-I (HR 3.09; 95% CI, 1.13-8.43), and initial treatment with curative surgery was significantly protective in terms of disease-specific survival in stage II-IIIA (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.71) and stage IIIB-IV (HR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.51). Further clinical studies are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with stage II-IV EMPD.

Case report of radiotherapy combined with anlotinib and immunotherapy for a patient with esophageal cancer and esophageal fistula

BackgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) is a frequent gastrointestinal malignancy. The most common types of EC pathology worldwide are esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Although surgical resection is still the main treatment modality for EC, most patients are already lost to surgery at the time of presentation due to the late stage. In recent years, the development of radiation therapy (RT) combined with targeted therapy (TT) and immunization therapy (IT) has brought more options for the treatment of EC. During radiation therapy, the radiation therapy area is very close to the trachea and esophagus, so radiation therapy may cause damage to the tissues of the trachea and esophagus, which is also known as a tracheoesophageal fistula (TF). We present the case of an EC patient who developed TF during radiation therapy and gradually improved after a combination of anlotinib and immunotherapy. MethodsThe patient was diagnosed with poorly differentiated ESCC by pathological biopsy and treated with “lobaplatin + Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Porassium Capsule” for 5 cycles. ResultsCT scan of the chest showed progression after treatment. During RT, the patient developed radiotherapy-related adverse effects, which were relieved by symptomatic support therapy. At the end of RT, the patient developed TF, but we chose to let the patient continue his radiation treatment plan with the anti-angiogenic drug “anlotinib.” ConclusionAfter radiation therapy, the patient continued to be treated with anlotinib and immunotherapy with camrelizumab, and the patient's lesion improved.

Late recurrent gastric carcinoma 12 years after surgery with attenuation of CD44 variant 9 expression

BackgroundLate recurrence of gastric cancer at 10 years post-gastrectomy is extremely rare, and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We report a para-aortic lymph node metastasis case that recurred 12 years postoperatively.Case presentationA 44-year-old woman pathologically diagnosed with moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with pT2(SS)pN2cM0pStageIIIA according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (the 13th Edition) underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1 + lymph node dissection. She received adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil (400 mg/day) for 2 years. At postoperative year (POY) 5, a swollen lymph node was detected in the No.16b1lat lymph node station. However, positron emission tomography (PET) revealed normal uptake, and the levels of tumor markers were within normal limits; hence, the possibility of metastasis was considered low, and the patient was placed under observation. At POY 12, computed tomography revealed an enlargement of the No.16b1lat lymph node station, and PET showed abnormal uptake. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Hence, a diagnosis of recurrence of gastric cancer was made. The patient underwent para-aortic nodal dissection (PAND) of No.16b1lat & int stations. Immunochemical staining results also suggested the recurrence of gastric cancer. However, the expression of CD44 variant 9 (CD44v9), a cancer stem cell marker for gastric adenocarcinoma, was attenuated in the recurrent lesions compared with that in the primary lesions. Postoperatively, she received chemotherapy with tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil (80 mg/day) for 1 year. Bone metastasis was observed at POY 4 after PAND, and the IHC analysis showed a HER2 score of 3 + in a needle biopsy specimen of bone metastasis. The expression of CD44v9 was slightly positive. The patient is being treated with chemotherapy with FOLFOX + trastuzumab.ConclusionsA defense mechanism against reactive oxygen species has been reported as a mechanism causing recurrence of CD44v9-positive gastric cancer. Consequently, CD44v9-positive gastric cancer grows in metastatic organs, repeatedly self-renews, and proliferates to form recurrent lesions. In the present case, the degree of CD44v9 staining in recurrent lesions was suggested to be related to the recurrence time.

A small-scale, exploratory real-world study of nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and tegafur in the perioperative treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a study protocol for a real-world clinical trial.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is an optimized and improved derivative of paclitaxel with superior efficacy and fewer adverse reactions, and it is widely used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin (LBP) and tegafur in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. This analysis is a prospective, single-center, open-label, historically controlled real-world study designed to include 10 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel combined with LBP and tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium. The primary and main efficacy outcomes are safety indicators, including the incidence of adverse drug reactions and adverse events (AEs), as well as the outliers of laboratory indicators and vital signs. The secondary efficacy outcomes are overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and proportion of dose suspensions, dose reductions and discontinuations. Based on the findings of previous studies, we wished to assess the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with LBP and tegafur in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The trial requires constant contact and monitoring. The purpose is to determine a superior protocol in terms of patient survival, and pathological and objective response. This trial has been registered with the Clinical Trial Registry: NCT05052931 (registration date: 2021/9/12).

Nab-paclitaxel plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new combination of nab-paclitaxel plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, and S-1, 80 to 120 mg/day on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Treatments were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). The number of patients enrolled were 54, and 51 patients were evaluated for efficacy. A total of 14 patients achieved partial response (PR) with an ORR of 27.5%. The ORR varied by sites, with 53.8% (7/13) for gallbladder carcinoma, 18.4% (7/38) for cholangiocarcinoma. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and stomatitis. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 and 13.2 months, respectively. The combination of nab-paclitaxel with S-1 showed explicit antitumor activities and favorable safety profile in advanced BTC and could serve as a potential non-platinum and -gemcitabine-based regimen.

Pancreatic intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A pilot study.

To preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and safety of pancreatic intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (PAIC) with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Fifteen patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma received monthly, inpatient, 3-h, continuous PAIC of nab-paclitaxel at 180 mg/m2, combined with 60 mg oral tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule for 2 weeks. The therapeutic courses were repeated every 4 weeks. All patients had a preliminary diagnosis based on clinical symptoms, imaging data (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography/computed tomography), and tumor markers. The adverse effects, clinical benefit response (CBR), objective response rate (ORR), median progression free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were monitored. Fifteen patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled in this study, including 10 male and 5 female patients. The mean age at the time of treatment was 66.3 years (53-84 years). A total of 49 cycles of PAIC (mean = 3.27 cycles/patient) were performed. The most common treatment-related toxicities were alopecia, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting. No procedure-related complications were observed. The longest overall survival observed was 22 months and the maximum number of treatments for the same patient was six cycles. PAIC contributed a high rate (13/15 [86.67%]) and fast (10/15 [66.67%]) easement of pain, with apparent symptom relief within 24 h, especially local pain symptom. The pain anesis rate was 13 (86.67%). CBR was achieved in 13 (86.67%) patients (95%CI [59.54,98.34]). ORR was achieved in four (26.67%) patients (95%CI [7.79,55.10]). Disease Control Rate was achieved in 14 (93.33%) patients. The mPFS was 5.22 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.27-7.85 months). The mOS was 8.97 months (IQR, 5.65-13.70 months). In this study, the dose of the chemotherapeutics and the schedule of the transcatheter pancreatic arterial chemotherapy perfusion were shown to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective for the relief of clinical symptoms and CBR. These advantages can quickly establish the treatment belief and improve patient quality of life. This regimen requires further investigation in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Relapse and Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer, Treated with S-1 after Failure of Gemcitabine

Prognostic factors for patients with relapse and unresectable biliary tract cancer, treated with Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium (S-1) after failure of gemcitabine (GEM), are unclear. We searched for prognostic factors in patients with relapse and unresectable biliary tract cancer treated with S-1 after failure of GEM, and investigated the relationship between prognostic factors, and the therapeutic effect of S-1. We retrospectively analyzed data of 33 patients with relapse and unresectable biliary tract cancer treated with S-1 after failure of GEM treatment. Statistically significant prognostic factors were extracted using Cox's proportional hazard model. Data was also collected on prognostic factors prior to the first dose of S-1, final prescription of S-1, and end of treatment. Changes in prognostic factors before the first dose of S-1, at final prescription of S-1, and at the end of treatment were evaluated using the Friedman test. Multivariate analysis identified neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [hazard ratio (HR)=4.599, p=0.004] and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (HR=4.985, p=0.004) as independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival. Regarding the relationship between the therapeutic effect and prognostic factors, a significant change was observed in the change in PNI value from first administration of S-1 to the end of treatment (p=0.002). NLR and PNI are suggested to be prognostic factors in patients with relapse and unresectable biliary tract cancer, treated with S-1 after failure of GEM. Changes in PNI from the start of administration of S-1 may be related to therapeutic efficacy.

Long-Term Results of a Phase 2 Study of Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy Using S-1 for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Were Elderly or With Serious Comorbidities.

BackgroundThe optimal evidence-based management for the subsets of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to old age or serious comorbidities is currently lacking. This study aimed to assess the safety and local control rate (LCR) of S-1 (tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil potassium) combined with radiotherapy in these subsets of ESCC patients.MethodsLocally advanced ESCC patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to age >75 years or serious comorbidities were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial. The patients were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1, which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. The primary end-point was the 3-year LCR.ResultsOne hundred five ESCC patients were recruited between March 2013 and October 2015. At the median follow-up of 73.1 months (IQR 65.5–81.4 months), 3-year LCR was 61.1%, and 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival was 77.9, 42.3, and 24.8% respectively. For safety analysis, ≥grade 3 acute adverse events included thrombocytopenia (6.7%), leukopenia (2.9%), anemia (1.0%), anorexia (1.0%), fatigue (10.5%), hiccup (1.0%), pneumonitis (4.8%), and esophagitis (3.8%). Two patients (1.9%) died of late esophageal hemorrhage, and one patient (1.0%) died of late radiation-induced pneumonitis.ConclusionS-1 is a promising regimen in concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low toxicity and a favorable LCR in ESCC patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to old age or serious comorbidities.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01831531.

Apatinib plus 5-fluorouracil as a third or subsequent-line treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase-II, single-arm, prospective study.

BackgroundFor metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients for whom at least 2 lines of previous standard therapies have failed, the prognosis is often unfavorable due to very limited subsequent treatment options. We sought to explore the efficacy of apatinib, an oral small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a third- or subsequent-line treatment for mCRC.MethodsIn this phase-II, single-arm, prospective study, the eligible patients had been histologically confirmed to have adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum for which at least 2 previous regimens of standard therapies had failed. All the patients were treated with a daily dose of 250 mg of apatinib, in combination with capecitabine, Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium Capsule (S-1), or 5-FU, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.ResultsFrom June 2017 to April 2018, 16 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 4 achieved partial response, 7 had stable disease, and 5 had progression disease, resulting in an objective response rate of 25.00% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.27–52.38%], and a disease control rate of 68.75% (95% CI: 41.34–88.98%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.83 months (95% CI: 2.17–8.90 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.10 months (95% CI: 5.59–15.18 months). The common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were hand-foot syndrome (56.25%), hypertension (37.50%), proteinuria (37.50%), gingival bleeding (18.75%) and abdominal pain (18.75%). Grade 3 AEs, including hand-foot syndrome (18.75%), hypertension (12.50%), and proteinuria (12.50%), were observed in 7 patients.ConclusionsThe combination regimen of apatinib plus 5-FU had encouraging anti-tumor efficacy, and is a feasible third- or subsequent-line treatment option for mCRC.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03210064.

Intelligent Algorithm-Based CT Imaging for Evaluation of Efficacy of Docetaxel Combined with Fluorouracil on Patients with Gastric Cancer.

The study focused on the dual-source computed tomography (CT) images segmented by the decision tree algorithm, to explore the efficacy of docetaxel combined with fluorouracil therapy on gastric patients undergoing chemotherapy. In this study, 98 patients with gastric cancer who were treated in the hospital were selected as the research subjects. The decision tree algorithm was applied to segment dual-source CT images of gastric cancer patients. The decision tree is established according to the feature ring and the segmentation position. The machine inductively learns from the decision tree to extract the features of the CT image to obtain the optimal segmentation boundary. The observation group was treated with docetaxel combined with fluorouracil, and the control group was treated with docetaxel combined with tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsules. The general data of the two groups of patients were comparable and not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The two groups were compared for clinical efficacy, physical status, KPS score, improvement rate, and adverse drug reactions after treatment. The results showed that the improvement rate of physical fitness in the observation group was 38.78%, and the improvement rate in the control group was 18.37%. The total effective rate in the observation group was 42.85%, and the total effective rate in the control group was 36.73%. Obviously, the curative effect and improvement rate of physical fitness in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the decision tree algorithm proposed in this study demonstrates superb capabilities in feature extraction of CT images. The machine inductively learns from the decision tree to extract the features of the CT image to obtain the optimal segmentation boundary. The effect of docetaxel combined with fluorouracil is better than that of docetaxel combined with tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsules.

Nursing Mode for Advanced Gastric Carcinoma with Combined Application of Domestic Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium and Oxaliplatin

To observe and analyze the nursing method for advanced gastric carcinoma with combined application of domestic tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium and oxaliplatin. 160 patients who had been diagnosed with advanced gastric carcinoma in our hospital were selected as research objects and all of them were applied with therapy of domestic tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium and oxaliplatin. During treatment, targeted nursing mode was implemented to overcome relevant toxic reaction. The nursing effect was observed and analyzed. After implementation of nursing, all patients were applied with chemotherapy regimen successfully and the total treatment effective rate reached 78.13 %. During treatment with combined application of domestic tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium and oxaliplatin, the main toxic reactions were peripheral neurotoxicity, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, phlebitis, etc. The comparison of mental status score before and after nursing showed that the mental status was significantly better after nursing, p<0.05. During treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma with combined application of domestic tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium and oxaliplatin, implementing targeted nursing can significantly reduce toxic reactions.

Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Low‐dose apatinib and tegafur‐gimeracil‐oteracil as palliative treatment in recurrent cervical cancer patients with poor performance status: A case series

A large proportion of recurrent cervical cancer (RCC) patients present with poor performance status (PS) after comprehensive treatments, which usually prevents them from opting for clinical trials. We retrospectively analysed the effect and safety of low-dose apatinib and tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (TGO) in the treatment of these patients. Six patients treated with low-dose apatinib and TGO showed a disease control rate of 83.3% and grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs). This case series indicates that low-dose apatinib and TGO could be considered as palliative therapy for RCC patients with poor PS.

Huaier Granule Combined with Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium Promotes Stage IIb Gastric Cancer Prognosis and Induces Gastric Cancer Cell Apoptosis by Regulating Livin.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with high morbidity and poor survival rate. Its prognosis remains unsatisfactory, with a 5-year survival rate of <30%. Studies have indicated that Huaier granules have good antitumor efficacy and safety in several solid malignant tumors. Recent studies have also found that Huaier polysaccharides can promote apoptosis in numerous tumor cells, although only few studies have focused on the effects of Huaier granules on gastric cancers and the mechanisms underlying their antitumor role. We retrospectively evaluated stage IIb gastric cancer patients at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, through our outpatient system from January 2013 to December 2015. Fifty-four patients were in the Huaier+Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium (TGOP) group and 72 in the TGOP group. Further, we conducted CCK8, colony formation, Annexin V-FITC/PI, Western blot, RT-PCR, and plasmid transfection assays to analyze the mechanism by which Huaier polysaccharides play an antitumor role. We confirmed that Huaier granules combined with Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium could promote patient prognosis, with a better disease-free survival rate (51.32 ± 2.23 vs. 44.19 ± 2.26, p = 0.034) and overall survival rate (56.81 ± 1.32 vs. 51.32 ± 1.69, p = 0.020). Moreover, through cell proliferation assays, Western blot, RT-PCR, and detection of Livin expression at the mRNA and protein levels, we found that Huaier polysaccharides could promote gastric cancer cell apoptosis and inhibit gastric cancer cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Finally, we demonstrated that Huaier polysaccharides promote gastric cancer cell apoptosis through the regulation of Livin expression. Overexpression of Livin reversed the gastric cell apoptosis induced by Huaier polysaccharides. Huaier granules combined with Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium ameliorated stage IIb gastric cancer prognosis and induced gastric cancer cell apoptosis by regulating Livin.

Efficacy and safety of Apatinib and Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Efficacy and safety of Apatinib and Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Tegafur and 5-fluorouracil levels in tears and changes in tear volume in long-term users of the oral anticancer drug S-1.

ABSTRACTEye problems are an adverse reaction sometimes found in chemotherapy. Although not life-threatening, they can reduce patients’ quality of life. The highest incidence of eye problems is reported for the combination anticancer drug S-1 (tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil), and methods to prevent or treat the eye problems caused by this drug are presently lacking. To determine early detection methods and treatment for adverse ocular reactions, we measured changes in tear volume and levels of tegafur (FT) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an active metabolite of FT, in the tears of patients with long-term use of S-1. A total of 11 patients receiving S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery were included. Tear volume and FT and 5-FU levels in tears were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry during a maximum of 8 treatment cycles (48 weeks). For analysis, patients were divided into two groups: “watering eyes” (n=6, complaints of watering eyes at least once during the treatment period) and “no watering eyes” (n=5, no complaints of watering eyes). Both groups exhibited increased FT and 5-FU levels in tears upon initiation of S-1 treatment, and levels rapidly decreased upon discontinuation. Our findings suggest a relationship between FT level in tears and tear volume in patients with long-term S-1 use. The symptom of watering eyes may thus be linked to FT level in tears.