Despite considerable progress during last decade, laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) still remains a complex and time-demanding procedure. The number of patients with baseline chronic kidney diseases has gradually increased. to compare the results of our novel technique of LRC with late dividing of the ureters with conventional procedure. A total of 50 patients with bladder cancer, who underwent to LRC in a single clinic between April 2013 and January 2017, were included in the study. A conventional LRC was performed in 25 patients, while in other 25 cases, a novel technique of LRC was used. In all cases, LRC was done with fully intracorporeal urinary diversion. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for parametric testing. In order to compare two groups, Student t-test was used for independent samples. There were no significant differences between two groups in average length of procedure, blood loss volume and length of hospital stay. Major intraoperative complications (injury of the rectum) occurred in two patients, one in each group. Both cases were successfully managed intraoperatively. In addition, there were two postoperative complications in each group that required repeat intervention. The mean serum creatinine level on the 2nd day after surgery was significantly higher after conventional LRC (171.6 and 147.7 mol/L), while glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower (58 and 72 ml/min/1.73 m2), compared to group of novel technique of LRC with late dividing of the ureters. A total of four patients in group of conventional LRC and two patients in group of novel technique had cancer progression. Two patients (one in each group) died because of cancer progression after 15 and 34 months after surgery. The mean follow-up was 25.6 (12-39) months after LRC with late dividing of the ureters and 33.2 (18-48) months in group of standard LRC. LRC with late dividing of the ureters allow to prevent prolonged contact of hyperosmolar and, in some cases, non-sterile urine with peritoneum and decrease inflammation and risk of postoperative adhesions. Using of novel technique may decrease rate of perioperative nephropathy, which is especially important in patients with decreased renal function (single functioning kidney, hydronephrosis, diabetes, renal failure, adjuvant chemotherapy). However, more procedures and longer follow-up period are necessary in order to evaluate ontological results of the novel technique.