Breast Reconstruction Techniques Research Articles

The Breast-Pectoralis Flap: A New Advance in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Preliminary Report on 20 Cases.

In the past, several publications have described breast reconstruction techniques using the contralateral breast; however, interest has diminished because of technical difficulty, scarring, and poor aesthetic results. This study aimed to present a new breast reconstruction technique that uses a combination of the breast-pectoralis flap and abdominal advancement flap. This retrospective study analyzed the results and complications of 20 consecutive breast reconstructions with the breast-pectoralis flap technique. The authors present a series of 20 breast reconstructions using the breast-pectoralis flap. Delayed breast reconstruction was performed in 13 (65%) cases, breast reconstruction in 5 (25%) patients with Poland syndrome, sequela correction after a chest wall sarcoma in 1 (5%), and sequela correction after breast cystic lymphangioma resection in 1 (5%). One complication required surgical reintervention without long-term consequences. The outcomes were considered very good in 50% of the cases, good in 45%, and fair in 5%. Breast-pectoralis flap associated with the abdominal advancement flap is an interesting advance in breast reconstruction. After the evaluation of the presented cases, we are considering widening the indications of this technique in our current practice.

3D Lipogluing: Preliminary Results of a Novel Technique for Direct Three-dimensional Fat Grafting in Breast Reconstruction Surgery.

Lipofilling has emerged as an effective technique in breast reconstruction for enhancing aesthetic outcomes and addressing residual deformities. Traditionally, fat grafting has been performed as a secondary step in implant-based breast reconstruction during the replacement of the expander with a breast implant or as a revisional procedure. Our study investigates the technical feasibility and presents preliminary results of a new promising technique for delivering fat grafting in a three-dimensional (3D) shape, directly during mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction or in delayed breast reconstructive procedures. Our new 3D lipogluing technique involves securing the fat tissue in a 3D manner using fibrin glue. This method enhances the coverage of soft tissues and provides improved volume and shape supplementation. In selected cases between December 2015 and September 2023, we treated 24 patients using the 3D lipogluing technique and five patients using 3D lipocubing (without use of fibrin glue).The patient cohort consisted of different indications for breast reconstructions: direct-to-implant, expander-based breast reconstruction, and "conservative" surgery. Preliminary findings suggest the technique is a safe and effective approach that can enhance the soft-tissue envelope of reconstructed breasts by acting as an autologous scaffold, owing to its regenerative properties. This technique not only improves the overall aesthetic outcome but also has the potential to reduce implant-related complications. Furthermore, ongoing studies are investigating methods to optimize the results and explore the potential application of 3D lipogluing and 3D lipocubing in breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery, cosmetic breast surgery, and other areas of plastic reconstructive and aesthetic surgery.

Contributors to post-operative venous thromboembolism risk after breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) events are a preventable complication for patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. However, there is a lack of consistency in the existing literature regarding the potential risk factors affecting these individuals. MethodsThis study aimed to investigate the potential risk factors associated with an increased risk of VTE following surgery for breast cancer. Data on patient characteristics such as age, body mass index (BMI), existing comorbidities, smoking history, surgical interventions, duration of hospitalization, and post-operative complications were recorded and analyzed. ResultsThirty-one studies investigating the incidence of VTE following surgical interventions for breast cancer were included. This study included 22,155 female patients with a mean age of 50.8 ± 2.9 years. The weighted mean length of surgery and hospital stay were 382.1 ± 170.0 min and 4.5 ± 2.7 days, respectively. The patients were followed-up for a weighted mean duration of 13.8 ± 21.2 months. The total incidence of VTE events was 2.2% (n = 489). Meta-analysis showed that patients with post-operative VTE had a significantly higher mean age and BMI, as well as longer mean length of surgery (P < 0.05). Comparing the techniques of autologous breast reconstruction showed that the risk of post-operative VTE is significantly higher with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, compared with the transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps (P < 0.05). Compared with delayed reconstruction, immediate reconstruction was associated with a significantly higher incidence of VTE (P < 0.05). Smoking history, length of hospital stay, and Caprini score did not correlate with increased incidence of post-operative VTE. ConclusionThe incidence rate of VTE events in patients receiving surgical treatment for breast cancer is 2.2%. Risk factors for developing post-operative VTE in this patient population were found to be older age, increased BMI, extended length of surgical procedures, and DIEP flap reconstruction.

Oncoplastic Breast Conservation for Central Tumors: Definition, Classification, and the Analysis of Single Institution Experience.

Tumors in the central part of the breast are usually considered more aggressive and technically difficult, which limits breast conservation. The definition of central tumors from a surgical point of view, classification of the techniques for partial breast reconstruction, and conceptual algorithm of choice based on tumor and breast characteristics are proposed, along with the estimation of surgical and oncological safety. This is a retrospective analysis of the single-institution experience, with a focus on the decision-making process for choosing the oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery technique. To evaluate the safety of breast conservation for central tumors, a comparative analysis of early surgical complications and oncological long-term results of treatment in patients with central breast tumor location and other breast tumor locations was performed. A total of 940 lumpectomies were performed in 926 patients during 15 years. The central breast tumor location group included 128 patients with 130 lumpectomies (13.8%), and the other breast tumor locations group included 798 patients with 810 lumpectomies (86.2%). We did not find any significant differences in the rate of early surgical complications and involved margins, local and systemic recurrence rates, time to progression, or overall survival between the groups. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is a safe procedure for the treatment of central tumors. In our opinion, the proposed classification of partial breast reconstruction techniques and an algorithm of their choice allow for effective restoration of the breast shape and volume according to the parameters of the tumor, breast, surgeon, and patient preferences.

Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence.

For women undergoing mastectomy, breast reconstruction can be performed by using implants or autologous tissue flaps. Mastectomy options include skin- and nipple-sparing techniques. Implant-based reconstruction can be performed with saline or silicone implants. Various autologous pedicled or free tissue flap reconstruction methods based on different tissue donor sites are available. The aesthetic outcomes of implant- and flap-based reconstructions can be improved with oncoplastic surgery, including autologous fat graft placement and nipple-areolar complex reconstruction. The authors provide an update on recent advances in implant reconstruction techniques and contemporary expanded options for autologous tissue flap reconstruction as it relates to imaging modalities. As breast cancer screening is not routinely performed in this clinical setting, tumor recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction is often detected by palpation at physical examination. Most local recurrences occur within the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Diagnostic breast imaging continues to have a critical role in confirmation of disease recurrence. Knowledge of the spectrum of benign and abnormal imaging appearances in the reconstructed breast is important for postoperative evaluation of patients, including recognition of early and late postsurgical complications and breast cancer recurrence. The authors provide an overview of multimodality imaging of the postmastectomy reconstructed breast, as well as an update on screening guidelines and recommendations for this unique patient population. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Patients' Satisfaction After Breast Reconstruction Surgery Using Autologous versus Implants: A Meta-Analysis.

Breast cancer is a common disease that affects women globally and causes physical and emotional challenges. Breast reconstructive surgery aims to restore the shape of the breast after a mastectomy. Two common approaches used today are tissue-based or autologous and implant-based reconstruction. Autologous breast reconstruction has the advantage of being more affordable, but the resulting shape is less attractive. At the same time, the implant technique produces a more pleasing shape at a more expensive cost. To compare the level of patients' satisfaction after breast reconstruction using the implant technique with the autologous technique using the Breast-Q questionnaire. This research was a meta-analytic study to compare patients' satisfaction levels with breast reconstruction using the autologous technique compared with the implant technique. We searched several research articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2014 to 2023. Then, we conducted an analysis using Revman 5.4. The results of the study were presented in a forest plot diagram. From the search results, there were 3980 studies. Then, exclusion and inclusion were carried out, and the results obtained were 16 research articles. Of the 16 studies, analysis was then carried out, and the results obtained were satisfaction in breast patients with a sample size of 7284. The standard result of the mean difference was 0.55 (95% CI 0.41-0.68) p < 0.00001. Satisfaction with the reconstruction results with a sample size of 2935. The standard result of the mean difference was 0.48 (95% CI 0.28-0.69) p < 0.00001. Patients' sexual satisfaction with a sample size of 7149. The standard result of the mean difference was 0.27 (95% CI 0.17-0.37) p < 0.00001. Patients' satisfaction with nipple shapes with a sample of 426. The standard result of the mean difference was 0.22 (95% CI -0.00-0.44) p = 0.06. Patients' satisfaction with plastic surgeons with a sample size of 272. The standard result of the mean difference was 0.52 (95% CI 0.25-0.80) p= 0.0002. The autologous breast reconstruction technique is better than the implant-based reconstruction technique in terms of patient satisfaction with the breast, reconstruction outcome, sexual satisfaction, nipple shapes, and plastic surgeons based on the Breast-Q questionnaire. The findings of this comprehensive study indicate that breast cancer survivors who choose autologous reconstruction have higher levels of satisfaction across multiple domains than those who decide implant-based reconstruction.

Triplane technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery: A case series report.

Implant-based breast reconstruction is an important method for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Currently, the most commonly used technique is the biplane technique. However, the high rate of postoperative complications, the inability of pockets to accommodate larger implants, and the expensive costs of biological mesh make the development of new surgical methods urgent. The triplane technique for breast reconstruction is an ideal candidate method. The main local symptoms were breast lump, abnormal breast skin, nipple discharge, and abnormal nipple or areola in 24 patients. The study included 24 female patients who underwent breast reconstruction using the triplane technique after radical breast cancer surgery. The surgical procedure involved measuring the dimensions of the breast, designing the incision, and creating a pocket for the implant using the triplane technique, which includes the pectoralis major muscle, the pectoralis major fascia continuing to the rectus abdominis fascia, and the latissimus dorsa muscle fascia continuing to the rectus abdominis fascia. Postoperative follow-up included regular assessments of pain and evaluation of breast appearance. No cases of postoperative infection were observed in all patients. During the 1-year follow-up period after surgery, 5 patients (20.8%) who needed radiotherapy after mastectomy for cancer showed slight darkening of skin flap pigment after using the triplane technique implant. No cases of exposure or infection of the expanders were reported, and 1 patient underwent expander replacement with a permanent prosthesis. All patients expressed satisfaction with the reconstructed breast shape. The 10 patients (41.7%) experiencing postoperative swelling and pain. However, the pain gradually subsided during the postoperative recovery period. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis of breast cancer were observed during the 1-year-follow-up period. The triplane technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery provides good implant coverage, reduces the risk of complications, and is cost-effective.

Breast Reconstruction using the Anterior Approach Scarless Latissimus Dorsi Muscular flap: A Single Center Retrospective Study

IntroductionScarless Latissimus Dorsi (LD) flap is a breast reconstruction technique which allow to cover the lower pole of implant with a large portion of the latissimus dorsi muscle without skin paddle; it represents a surgical solution that transpose vascularized tissue avoiding the failure of breast reconstruction, following necrosis of mastectomy skin flaps. Material and MethodA retrospective review of patients undergoing immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using scarless LD flap reconstructions was performed. Clinical data obtained from follow-up visits were recorded. To evaluate breast shape contentment and patient satisfaction, it was requested to the patients to answer the Breast-Q, version 2.0 reduction module postoperative scales questionnaire at the twelve-month follow-up. ResultsWe performed 19 scarless LD flap reconstruction between September 2019 to June 2022. The surgical time in average (considering minutes ± SD) was 130 (± 15) minutes.. The aesthetic assessment was good/excellent in 83% of patients. This was statistically significant (P=0.0). ConclusionsThe scarless latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction is a valid and reliable solution, which has the advantage to reduce the risk of exposed prosthesis if native skin necrosis occurs.

Postoperative Outcomes of Pre-Pectoral Versus Sub-Pectoral Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) techniques are rapidly evolving. We compared the results from a single-center implant IBR cohort between subpectoral and prepectoral implants with and without a mesh. We analyzed all complications and grade 2-3 complications, the implant loss rate, the surgery time, the length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction, the interval time to adjuvant therapy and cost, with a comparison between subpectoral and prepectoral implant IBR. Subpectoral implant IBR was carried out in 529 mastectomies (62.0%) and prepectoral in 324, with a significant increase in prepectoral placement in recent years. Mesh was used in 176 prepectoral placements (54.3%). Any grade of complication was reported in 147 mastectomies (17.2%), with a significantly higher rate for prepectoral implant IBR (p = 0.036). Regression analysis showed that prepectoral implant was not significantly associated with any grade of complication or with grade 2-3 complications. Prepectoral implant IBR was associated with a significantly shorter operative time and lower LOS. Grade 2-3 complications were significantly associated with lower satisfaction. Higher costs were significantly associated with the subpectoral placement and mesh. A complication rate predictive score identified five groups with a significant increase in grade 2-3 complications. Prepectoral-M-IBR increased over time with no difference in complication rates compared to subpectoral-M-IBR. Prepectoral implant placement can be considered a safe technique.

Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most frequently performed procedure for breast reconstruction following mastectomy, which involves the surgical placement of breast implants. The approach to breast reconstruction can be divided into two main categories, namely prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) and subpectoral breast reconstruction (SPBR), based on the implant plan and placement technique. In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the popularity of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, where the implants are positioned above the chest muscle, as opposed to beneath it in the subpectoral approach. However, despite this growing preference, there is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the national trends in the utilization of this technique, thus necessitating further investigation. This narrative review aims to ascertain the current global patterns linked to prepectoral breast reconstruction and elucidate the considerations surrounding patient and implant selection, reconstructive techniques, the utilization of meshes in prepectoral reconstruction, the ensuing outcomes and complications, the ramifications of radiotherapy, and the potential advantages of integrating fat infiltration into the implementation of this technique in breast reconstruction with a focus on published papers in last five years. Conclusion: Prepectoral breast reconstruction has emerged as an appropriate surgical option for individuals seeking breast reconstruction. This development can be attributed to the recent progress made in implant technology, which has significantly enhanced the outcomes of this procedure. Additionally, advancements in mastectomy techniques, autologous fat grafting, and the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have also played a vital role in improving the aesthetic results of prepectoral breast reconstruction. As a result, the significance and effectiveness of this technique in the field of breast reconstruction have been firmly established, making it an essential component of the overall armamentarium available to plastic surgeons for breast reconstruction purposes.

Initial Experience with Unidirectional Barbed Suture for Abdominal Donor Site Closure in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a predominant technique for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the best method of abdominal fascial closure in this technique is not well defined. This study details our initial experience with unidirectional barbed suture-only repair of abdominal donor site fascia. Patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and abdominal fascial closure with Stratafix Symmetric Polydioxanone PDS Plus were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding pertinent patient history, medical comorbidities, risk factors, and surgical technique was extracted, along with the incidence of eight separate postoperative abdominal surgical site occurrences. Retrospective review identified 43 patients who underwent 19 unilateral and 24 bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedures (n = 67). Average patient follow-up was 791 days (range 153-1769). Six patients (14%) had a complication of the donor site. Seroma was most frequent (n = 3, 7%), followed by surgical site infection (n = 2, 5%). One patient had incisional dehiscence (2%) and another patient developed bulging (2%). No patients had chronic pain, weakness, hematoma, or hernia postoperatively. Patients with donor site complications had a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery significantly more often than the patients without donor site complications (100% versus 49%; P = 0.032). Abdominal fascial repair with Stratafix Symmetric suture alone led to low rates of abdominal donor site morbidity, including no hernia and rare bulging, following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Additional advantages of this technique may be reduced operative times and lower operative costs compared with alternative methods of fascial repair, although prospective and randomized studies are warranted.

Imaging findings after a total reconstructed breast with autologous fat transfer: what the radiologist needs to know.

Abstract Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is an upcoming technique for total breast reconstruction. Consequently, radiological imaging of women with an AFT reconstructed breast will increase in the coming years, yet radiological experience and evidence after AFT is limited. The surgical procedure of AFT and follow-up with imaging modalities including mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and MRI in patients with a total breast reconstruction with AFT are summarized to illustrate the radiological normal and suspicious findings for malignancy. Imaging after a total breast reconstruction with AFT appears to be based mostly on benign imaging findings with an overall low biopsy rate. As higher volumes are injected in this technique, the risk for the onset of fat necrosis increases. Imaging findings most often are related to fat necrosis after AFT. On MG, fat necrosis can mostly be seen as oil cysts. The occurrence of a breast seroma after total breast reconstruction with AFT is an unfavourable outcome and may require special treatment. Fat deposition in the pectoral muscle is a previously unknown, but benign entity. Although fat necrosis is a benign entity, it can mimic breast cancer (recurrence). In symptomatic women after total breast reconstruction with AFT, MG and US can be considered as first diagnostic modalities. Breast MRI can be used as a problem-solving tool during later stage. Future studies should investigate the most optimal follow-up strategy, including different imaging modalities, in patients treated with AFT for total breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in patients with obesity: a narrative review.

Breast reconstruction in patients with obesity presents numerous challenges, both in terms of surgical technique and post-operative complication management. As breast reconstruction techniques continue to evolve, the armamentarium of reconstructive options for patients with obesity has vastly expanded. Options now include immediate or delayed, implant-based, autologous, or hybrid reconstruction. Determining the optimal breast reconstruction in this complex population requires nuanced and experienced decision-making. A literature search was conducted to identify studies assessing breast reconstruction considerations in patients with obesity. The search was performed on PubMed and was limited to English language studies published between 1990 and 2023. Primary studies, case reports, chart reviews, and qualitative studies were included. Additional articles were identified for inclusion based on a review of references, as well as a web-based search, to identify additional studies that were not captured with the primary search strategy. This narrative review article summarizes the current literature available to guide surgeons in breast reconstruction in patients with obesity. The advancements in oncologic surgery and breast reconstruction techniques have expanded available surgical options, including immediate or delayed implant-based, autologous, or hybrid breast reconstruction. Each approach has its unique advantages, disadvantages, and surgical considerations. Despite the challenges, patients with obesity can achieve favorable aesthetic outcomes through careful assessment of comorbidities and expectation management.

Current status of autologous breast reconstruction in Europe: how to reduce donor site morbidity.

Autologous reconstruction techniques for breast reconstruction have significantly evolved in the last few decades in Europe. In the search of reducing the donor site morbidity, surgeons explored the possibilities to preserve the rectus muscle and its function, and a transition to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps was started in the nineties. Throughout the years, and especially in the last decade, we have increasingly implemented aesthetic refinements for donor site handling in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. In our practice, autologous breast reconstruction provides an opportunity to effectively remodel the donor site, minimising functional morbidity, and maximising aesthetic satisfaction. To achieve this, careful patient selection, pre-operative preparation, meticulous intra-operative dissection, and a clear post-operative protocol are essential. The main goal in autologous breast reconstruction, and its biggest advantage, is to offer the patient a natural look and feel of the reconstructed breast. A second goal is to minimize the number of procedures needed to reach the desired breast shape, size, and volume. In most patients, the number of operations ranges between one and three. The third main goal is to minimize the donor site morbidity, both functionally and aesthetically. Functionally, this implies preserving as much of the rectus abdominis muscle as possible, limiting the fascia incision, preserving the motor branches to the muscle, ensuring an adequate fascial closure, and repairing the rectus diastasis is present. Aesthetically, we aim to have a low position of the scar, an aesthetically pleasing location of the umbilicus, and limited or no lateral skin excess or so called "dogears". In this clinical practice review article, we provide an overview of current autologous reconstruction methods, with a focus on minimising donor site morbidity and enhancing the aesthetic result of the donor site. We discuss key concepts in autologous reconstruction and provide surgical pearls for performing the procedure effectively with optimal reconstructive and aesthetic result.

MT14 Inequity in Access to Breast Reconstruction Techniques in Belgian Health System: Is it Justified?

MT14 Inequity in Access to Breast Reconstruction Techniques in Belgian Health System: Is it Justified?

Sensory Outcomes after Neurotization in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Background: Mastectomy and breast reconstruction techniques continue to evolve to optimize aesthetic and reconstructive outcomes. However, the loss of sensation after mastectomy remains a major limitation. This article describes our evolution of a novel approach that we first described in 2019, combining recent advances in breast oncologic, reconstructive, and peripheral nerve surgery to optimize sensory outcomes. Methods: Nipple-sparing mastectomy was performed in all patients and involved preservation of lateral intercostal nerves when anatomy was favorable. When nerves could not be preserved without compromising oncologic safety, nipple–areolar complex neurotization was performed using allograft or intercostal autograft from a transected T3, T4, or T5, lateral intercostal nerve to identified subareolar nerve targets. Immediate, prepectoral, direct-to-implant reconstruction was then performed. Acroval one-point moving and one-point static pressure thresholds established baseline sensibility values, which were then repeated at multiple time points postoperatively. Results: Outcomes from 47 women (79 breasts) were assessed prospectively. Mean follow-up was 9.2 months (range 6–14 months). At 6 months postoperatively, over 80% of patients had good-to-excellent one-point moving as well as one-point static sensibility scores averaged across all areas tested. None of the patients developed persistent dysesthesia or clinical evidence of neuroma. Conclusions: This study represents the largest series reported to date of sensibility outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant reconstruction with concurrent neurotization. Sensibility results show that this approach allows for preservation of high degrees of breast and nipple–areolar complex sensation in most patients.

The International Awareness of Breast Reconstruction.

To our knowledge, this is the first and largest study conducted to collect data among surgeons worldwide about breast reconstruction. We have aimed to collect data about breast reconstruction worldwide, the most popular breast reconstruction techniques, and the barriers behind the low rate of breast reconstruction according to surgeons. A comparative cross-sectional design was used in this study. A prepared questionnaire, which was developed after reviewing the literature review conducted for this study, was used to collect data. The questionnaire is multiple choice. It was distributed among surgeons online. The study includes 812 participants who live all over the world, representing 79 countries. More than a third of surgeons perform less than 10 breast reconstructions per year (33.38%), and 45.86% of them think that immediate surgery is the most frequent practice. A higher percentage of participants prefer implants over autologous reconstruction as a technique for breast reconstruction (54.9%). Moreover, 39.02% of participants shared that a lack of knowledge about the availability of breast reconstruction was a reason for refusing the surgery. This study demonstrates that the breast reconstruction rate is still low and that most surgeons prefer implants that are performed immediately. The lack of knowledge among patients about the availability of breast reconstruction is the most common reason for refusing reconstruction. Therefore, there is a need to increase patient awareness about the availability of this surgery.

Survey of Surgeon-reported Postoperative Protocols for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction.

The use of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps is a well-established breast reconstruction technique. A 29-question survey was e-mailed to 3186 active American Society of Plastic Surgeons members, aiming to describe postoperative monitoring practice patterns among surgeons performing DIEP flaps. From 255 responses (8%), 79% performing DIEP surgery were analyzed. Among them, 34.8% practiced for more than 20 years, 34.3% for 10-20 years, and 30.9% for less than 10 years. Initial 24-hour post-DIEP monitoring: intensive care unit (39%) and floor (36%). Flap monitoring: external Doppler (71%), tissue oximetry (41%), and implantable Doppler (32%). Postoperative analgesia: acetaminophen (74%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (69%), neuromodulators (52%), and opioids (4.4%) were administered on a scheduled basis. On postoperative day 1, 61% halt intravenous fluids, 67% allow ambulation, 70% remove Foley catheter, and 71% start diet. Most surgeons discharged patients from the hospital on postoperative day 3+. Regardless of experience, patients were commonly discharged on day 3. Half of the surgeons are in academic/nonacademic settings and discharge on/after day 3. This study reveals significant heterogeneity among the practice patterns of DIEP surgeons. In light of these findings, it is recommended that a task force be convened to establish standardized monitoring protocols for DIEP flaps. Such protocols have the potential to reduce both the length of hospital stays and overall care costs all while ensuring optimal pain management and vigilant flap monitoring.

The Donut DIEP Flap: A Novel Scarless Technique.

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery is a common technique for breast reconstruction. However, the long and noticeable abdominal scarring is one of its greatest disadvantages. Here, we suggest a minimal scarring DIEP flap harvest with a novel abdominal design. The key to this method is to preserve more skin tissue with a circular design centered around the navel. Three circular incisions are made: (1) the smallest circle represents an incision around the umbilicus; (2) the middle circle with a radius of <3.5 cm indicates skin incision because the donut-like skin paddle between the small and middle circles is included in the flap; (3) the largest circle with a radius of >10 cm represents the extent of flap dissection that was done diagonally from the skin toward the Scarpa's fascia. Pedicle dissection is proceeded with the conventional method. For closure, a purse-string suture is performed with the umbilicus at its center leaving only a single small circular scar around the umbilicus as the final scar. Closure of the donor-site is possible with the patient in a supine or slightly flexed position due to less skin excision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Online Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) Score Tool in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in a Case Series with Cutoff Determination

AbstractThe Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) score is a tool for the prediction of the risk of complications in breast surgery, elaborated in 2014. This score assesses the risk of surgical complications related to each type of breast reconstruction technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using the calculator on patients who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction with submuscular tissue expander or prepectoral prosthesis. Our retrospective study analyzed 92 patients whose data was entered into the calculator. The predicted and observed 1-year rates of overall surgical complications were compared, separately for both cohorts. Subsequently, the accuracy, the applicability, and the discrimination ability of the BRA score were assessed using statistical analysis. In the two-stage subpectoral reconstruction group, Mann–Whitney U test showed a statistically significant difference in BRA-score values between the patients who developed complications compared to the patients who had no complications (p-value &lt; 0.02). Moreover, the score has an excellent discrimination ability (AUC = 0.9), and a cutoff of overall surgical complication rate was found to be between 17 and 18%. For the one-stage prepectoral prosthetic reconstruction group, the BRA score tool was unable to discriminate between patients with complications and patients without complication. Our results suggest that the BRA score can accurately identify patients with risk of complications following two-stage subpectoral breast reconstruction. Moreover, we believe it is possible to identify a risk rate cutoff of overall surgical complications that may potentially help physicians select the safest surgical strategy.