Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Technique Research Articles

Injectable Modified Sodium Alginate Microspheres for Enhanced Operative Efficiency and Safety in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for resecting early-stage tumors in the digestive system. To achieve a low injection pressure of the injected fluid and continuous elevation of the mucosa following injection during the ESD technique, we introduced an innovative injectable sodium-alginate-based drug-loaded microsphere (Cipro-ThSA) for ESD surgery, which was generated through an emulsion reaction involving cysteine-modified sodium alginate (ThSA) and ciprofloxacin. Cipro-ThSA microspheres exhibited notable adhesiveness, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial properties, providing a certain level of postoperative wound protection. In vitro cell assays confirmed the decent biocompatibility of the material. Lastly, according to animal experiments involving submucosal elevation of porcine colons, Cipro-ThSA microspheres ensure surgically removable lift height while maintaining the mucosa for approximately 246% longer than saline, which could effectively reduce surgical risks while providing sufficient time for operation. Consequently, the Cipro-ThSA microsphere holds great promise as a novel submucosal injection material, in terms of enhancing the operational safety and effectiveness of ESD surgery.

Effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection on postoperative wound bleeding‐related complications in patients with superficial esophageal cancer: A meta‐analysis

AbstractOperative therapy for superficial esophagus carcinoma is the main way to treat the disease. Endoscopic excision of lesions in the esophagus has become an alternative to surgical treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma. To overcome the disadvantages of endoscope mucosa excision (EMR), an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique has been developed. Although ESD is one of the most effective methods of endoscopy in patients with digestive tract tumors, there are potential complications after surgery, including hemorrhage in the surgical area and stenosis of the esophagus. The objective of this study was to evaluate EMR versus ESD based on post‐operative hemorrhage and esophagus stenosis. All the related articles were retrieved from the e‐databases. The main results were postoperative perforation, hemorrhage, and stenosis after surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post‐operative wound hemorrhage (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.36–3.29 p = 0.89). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of perforation after surgery (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.17–1.95 p = 0.37). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of esophageal stricture after surgery (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.26–5.15 p = 0.85). This analysis was different from the earlier meta‐analysis because ESD and EMR did not show any notable differences with respect to the incidence of perforation after surgery, the hemorrhage of the wound or the stenosis of the esophagus. These findings must, however, be supported by more high‐quality studies.

A Case of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Successfully Treated with Endoscopic Anti-gastroesophageal Reflux Mucosal Resection by the ESD-G Method (with video).

A 70-year-old man who had undergone treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by a family doctor presented to our hospital with severe heartburn and dysphagia despite taking vonoprazan (20 mg) for 3 months. A diagnosis of vonoprazan-refractory nonerosive reflux disease was made based on esophagogastroduodenoscopy and esophageal function examinations. The patient elected to undergo endoscopic treatment for GERD. Therefore, we performed endoscopic treatment using the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD-G) technique developed at our institution. After endoscopic treatment, his GERD symptoms disappeared and he no longer required GERD-related medications. An examination of his esophageal function revealed the improvement of items related to GERD.

Endoscopic resection of a large ampullary tumor using a hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and mucosal resection technique.

Endoscopic resection of a large ampullary tumor using a hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and mucosal resection technique.

Magnetic ring-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions with submucosal fibrosis: A preliminary study in beagle model.

During endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric lesions with fibrosis, appropriate traction could provide clear submucosal dissection visualization to improve safety and efficiency of procedures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of magnetic ring-assisted ESD (MRA-ESD) for gastric fibrotic lesions. In the eight healthy beagles, 2-3mL of 50% glucose solution was injected into submucosal layer of the stomach to induce gastric fibrotic lesions. A week after submucosal injection, two endoscopists at different levels performed MRA-ESD or standard ESD (S-ESD) for gastric simulated lesions, respectively. The magnetic traction system consisted of external handheld magnet and internal magnetic ring. The feasibility and procedure outcomes of the magnetic traction system were mainly evaluated. Forty-eight gastric simulated lesions with ulceration were confirmed to have submucosal fibrosis formation by preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography. The magnetic traction system could be easily established, only took 1.57min, and allowed excellent submucosal visualization. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in the MRA-ESD group than in the S-ESD group for both endoscopists (mean: 46.83 vs. 25.09min, p<0.001), and this difference was accentuated in non-skilled endoscopist. There was significant difference between two groups in bleeding and perforation rates. Histological analysis showed the depth of resected specimens was a little deeper around the fibrotic portion in the S-ESD group (p<0.001). The magnetic ring-assisted ESD technique may be an effective and safe treatment for gastric fibrotic lesions and may shorten the endoscopic learning curve for non-skilled endoscopists.

328. ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA INVOLVING THE ENTIRE ESOPHAGUS: SHORT-TERM RESULTS

Abstract Background The treatment of superficial esophageal carcinoma involving the entire esophagus remains challenging due to the difficulty in accurate preoperative diagnosis and the complexity of the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) technique. The management of esophageal stricture following ESD also remains controversial. In this study, we analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of ESD for superficial whole circumferential esophageal carcinoma in our hospital, based on short-term results. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients diagnosed with superficial esophageal carcinoma involving the entire circumference and treated with ESD from January 2021 to the present. We evaluated the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, treatment-related complications of ESD, post-ESD stenosis, and adverse events associated with stenosis prophylaxis. Treatment Course: The primary treatment consisted of circumferential resection under general anesthesia followed by local injection of 120–320 mg of steroids into the ulcer after resection. Patients were started on a diet 2–3 days after surgery and initiated oral steroid therapy starting with 30 mg with PPI and Sulfamethoxazole Trimethoprim. The dose of steroids was gradually reduced by 5 mg every 3 weeks for a total of 18 weeks. Results The study included 7 males and 3 females with a mean age of 72.9 years. The lesions were located in Upper 1, Middle 5, and Lower 4. The average dissection time was 89.1 minutes, the mean length of endoscopic longitudinal mucosal defects was 70 mm, and the en bloc resection rate was 100%. The histological depth was EP/LPM 5, MM/SM 13, and SM2 or deeper 2. The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis was 80%, but all SM2 lesions were underdiagnosed as SM1. No ESD-related adverse events were observed in any case. Two patients with SM2 after ESD underwent additional surgery. Stenosis occurred in 25% of cases. Steroid-related events included drug-induced liver dysfunction in 4 cases, esophageal candida in 2 cases, pulmonary tuberculosis in 1 case, and delayed perforation in 1 case. Conclusion ESD for superficial esophageal carcinoma involving the entire esophagus can be safely and effectively performed. Steroid administration may be useful for preventing post-ESD stenosis, but its management requires attention as it may cause adverse events.

High-power green-light laser endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A technical improvement and its initial application.

The technique of laser en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been a valuable alternative technique to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). However, the combination of laser ERBT and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique has not been well studied. Here, a novel technique integrating a high-power green-light laser with ESD was presented. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high-power green-light laser endoscopic submucosal dissection (HPL-ESD) for the treatment of primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). From January 2015 to December 2018, a total of 56 patients with NMIBC underwent HPL-ESD. All tumors were transurethral en bloc resected in the ESD technique. Perioperative clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All operations were safely performed by the technique of HPL-ESD without blood transfusion. The mean tumor diameter was 2.04 ± 0.65 cm, ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 cm. The mean operative time was 28.39 ± 16.04 min. The average serum hemoglobin decrease was 0.88 ± 0.54 g/dL. The mean postoperative catheterization time was 2.88 ± 0.94 days. The pathologic stages included pTa (32 cases), and pT1 (24 cases). Double-J stent indwelling was not performed for four patients whose tumors were adjacent to the ureteral orifice and no postoperative hydronephrosis was observed. Only one case of ectopic bladder tumor recurred due to irregular bladder irrigation during the 36-month follow-up. HPL-ESD is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of primary NMIBCs, especially for tumors adjacent to the ureteral orifice.

Snare-based circumferential traction technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection of long circumferential early esophageal carcinoma.

Snare-based circumferential traction technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection of long circumferential early esophageal carcinoma.

Endoskopická submukózna disekcia v rekte – naša skúsenosť

Summary: Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic treatment method for the removal of neoplastic lesions of the digestive tract. Thanks to this technique, we can achieve complete (en bloc) R0 endoscopic resection of even large lesions in one piece. We thereby obtain a valuable resection for further histopathological evaluation and, with a suitably chosen lesion, achieve a curative resection. Methods: Retrospective analysis of our file in the period 1/2020–01/2023. The primary objective was to determine how endoscopic evaluation and selection of included rectal lesions treated with the ESD technique correlates with histopathological results. The secondary objective was to determine the curability of the treatment we performed in our group of patients. We included lesions over 20 mm with the assumption of maximum invasion into the surface parts of the submucosa, i.e., JNET 2B. In addition, we included recurrent lesions in the scar after previous endoscopic or surgical treatment, submucosal lesions up to 20 mm and lesions smaller than 20 mm, especially in the lower rectum, which cannot be radically removed en bloc by loop-based techniques. Results: We included a total of 76 rectal lesions. JNET 2B lesions were 59 of them (77.6%). The most common histopathological diagnosis was high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 35 (46%) cases. We achieved curative endoscopic resection in the majority (93.4%) of patients. Five patients (5.26%) required subsequent surgical or oncological therapy after ESD and further staging. Conclusion: The results of our work confirm the effectiveness of ESD as a therapeutic method suitable for achieving en bloc R0 resection of rectal lesions and thus their correct histopathological evaluation. However, the correct selection of patients remains crucial. Key words: endoscopic submucosa dissection – rectal lesions – curative resection

Usefulness of the S-O clip for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score-matched study.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors (SNADETs) is associated with a high rate of en bloc resection. However, the technique for ESD remains challenging. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of S-O clips in colonic and gastric ESD. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of duodenal ESD using an S-O clip for SNADETs. Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for SNADETs between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare patients who underwent duodenal ESD with the S-O clip (S-O group) and those who underwent conventional ESD (control group). Intraoperative perforation rate was the primary outcome, while procedure time and R0 resection rate were the secondary outcomes. After propensity score matching, 16 pairs were created: 43 and 17 in the S-O and control groups, respectively. The intraoperative perforation rate in the S-O group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p=0.033). A significant difference was observed in the procedure time between the S-O and control groups (39±9 vs. 82±30 minutes, respectively; p=0.003). The S-O clip reduced the intraoperative perforation rate and procedure time, which may be useful and effective in duodenal ESD.

A novel countertraction-assisted technique facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric angle cancer without the use of a transparent hood.

The adoption of the transparent hood as an invisible assistant has promoted the technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and put it on the fast track to widespread use. However, the transparent hood may sacrifice part of the surgical view and often contributes to blurred visibility through the accumulation of dirty fluid and fogging. We have developed a countertraction-assisted technique for gastric ESD that is independent of the transparent hood ([Video 1]).

"Clip hooking rubber loop" technique for traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Watch a video of this article.

Utility of image-enhanced magnifying endoscopy and traction wire for a successful endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer.

Characterizing tumor extent in early gastric cancer (EGC) is difficult and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is often necessary [1] [2]. Submucosal dissection of large lesions via endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a time-consuming task. Here, we report the benefit of the traction wire (ERD-TW35; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) [3] [4] [5] as a unique technique for ESD.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Facilitating Techniques Among Non-experts: A Systematic Literature Review

The dissemination of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been limited by its technical complexity and safety profile, particularly among non-experts. Various techniques and devices have facilitated the performance of ESD, but their yield and role in the path to learning ESD remain unclear. We performed a systematic review by querying MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Japan Medical Abstracts Society specifically for comparative studies investigating the impact of assigned ESD techniques vs. conventional techniques among non-experts in ESD (< 50 ESD procedures). Procedural outcomes of efficacy, efficiency, and safety were assessed. We identified 46 studies evaluating 54 cohorts in which a total 237 non-experts performed 2461 ESDs conventionally, and 1953 ESDs using an assigned ESD technique (knives, countertraction, miscellaneous techniques). The majority of studies were from East Asia (67%), single-center (96%), observational in design (61%), in ananimal model (57%), and gastric location (63%). The most studied techniques were countertraction techniques (48% cohorts) and scissor knives (15% cohorts), both of which commonly enhanced efficiency of ESD, and less so efficacy or safety. Techniques found to be beneficial in experts were more likely to be beneficial in non-experts (70% concordance) than vice versa (47% concordance). Based on the currently available literature, countertraction techniques and scissor knives should be considered for early incorporation into ESD training by non-experts. Several aspects of ESD training remain understudied, including techniques in Western non-experts, educational resources, and several commonly cited techniques. These areas should guide future investigation to enhance the pathway to learning ESD.

Endoscopic resection of a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor without perforation using a detachable snare.

Resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently been reported [1] [2]. However, when endoscopic resection is performed, a full-layer resection of the gastric wall is often necessary, and extensive suturing is required if perforation occurs. We report the case of a patient with a GIST that was completely resected safely and easily without perforation using the ESD technique in combination with a detachable snare.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review.

ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.

Pretraction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Minor rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be resected endoscopically using various procedures. Nevertheless, there remains controversy with regard to which of the possible endoscopic approaches is the most effective [1] [2] [3]. As revealed by relevant reports, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of rectal NETs; however, ESD requires physicians to have more surgical skills and operative times are longer than for other endoscopic resection techniques [2]. A pretraction-assisted ESD technique for small rectal NETs was therefore created to simplify the process and facilitate the operation ([Video 1]).

Effect of robot-assisted gastric ESD in difficult ESD locations.

355 Background: Since its introduction, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment for early malignant lesions of stomach. However, ESD is technically demanding and it bears a high risk of complication for beginners. The difficulty of the ESD technique tends to depend on the location of the lesion. We compared and analyzed the efficacy of the ESD assistive robot that we developed in the location where stomach ESD is considered difficult. Methods: We have developed an automated simulator that can implement gastric ESD locations. An EndoGel (Sunarrow, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the simulator to implement a virtual gastric location where ESD is difficult. "Difficult ESD locations" were selected in consideration of the location where a lot of muscle damage and frequent blind dissections occurred when conventional ESD was performed. An experienced endoscopist performed ten robot-assisted ESDs or conventional ESDs in 3 difficult and 3 easy positions, respectively. Results: While there was no significant difference in dissection speed of robot ESD and conventional ESD in easy positions, the submucosal dissection speed was remarkably faster in robotic ESD than in conventional ESD in difficult positions (P &lt; 0.05). In difficult positions, there was significantly more muscle damage in conventional ESD than in robotic ESD. (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Dissection speed was greatly improved when assistive robots aided gastric ESD procedures in difficult locations. Our robotic device can thus provide simple, effective, and safe multidirectional traction during gastric ESD in difficult location.

Effective, safe and efficient porcine model of Forrest Ib bleeding gastric and colonic ulcers.

Developing effective gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding animal models is necessary to advance endoscopic hemostasis methods and train endoscopists on their use. Our aim, therefore, was to develop an effective and safe porcine GI bleeding model in the stomach and colon of large and small-sized oozing-type ulcers. Gastric and colonic bleeding ulcers were created using either a hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique or a cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C) technique in 14 pigs. Prior to ulcer creation, animals were treated with either oral apixaban or intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin anticoagulation in combination with clopidogrel and aspirin. The primary outcome was the technical success of inducing oozing-type Forrest Ib bleeding ulcers. Secondary outcomes included ulcer diameter, number, creation time and the number of complications associated with each technique. Using hybrid ESD and IV heparin anticoagulation, bleeding was observed in 21/23 (91.3%) gastric ulcers and 6/7 (85.7%) colonic ulcers created. The mean diameter and ulcer creation time were 2.3 ± 0.3cm and 5.3 ± 0.5min, respectively, for gastric ulcers and 2.2 ± 0.4cm and 4.06 ± 0.6min, respectively, for colonic ulcers. Using EMR-C and IV heparin anticoagulation, bleeding was observed in 14/15 (93.3%) gastric ulcers and 6/6 (100%) colonic ulcers created. The mean diameter and ulcer creation time were 0.8 ± 0.2cm and 2.1 ± 0.5min, respectively, for gastric ulcers and 0.7 ± 0.2cm and 1.7 ± 0.3min, respectively, for colonic ulcers. None of the ulcers created in animals anticoagulated with apixaban developed bleeding. None of the 14 pigs developed any complications. We have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of a porcine GI bleeding model utilizing IV heparin anticoagulation and either hybrid ESD or EMR-C techniques to create oozing-type bleeding ulcers in the stomach and colon with customizable size.

Endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal lesions using the colonic Ovesco full-thickness resection device: Retrospective observational case series of 22 cases

Background and study aims The endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFRT) device (FTRD) has been shown to have acceptable outcomes in regard to efficacy and safety in the resection of colorectal lesions. Data on its use in the upper gastrointestinal tract are limited to small case series. Patients and methods All consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric or duodenal lesions at our institutions were analyzed retrospectively for a primary endpoint of technical success. Results A total of 22 patients with duodenal and gastric lesions underwent EFTR between June 2018 and February 2022. Technical success was achieved in 20 of 22 (91 %) of the procedures. Indications for EFTR were: subepithelial tumor (n = 14), mucosal lesion (n = 5), scar resection (n = 2), and EFTR of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) resection base (n = 1). The FTRD could be advanced to the lesion in all 22 cases (100 %). No dilation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) or pylorus was required to pass the device. There were 14 cases of gastric lesions and eight duodenal. One subepithelial lesion was too big for the cap and one scar could not be sucked into the cap. One lesion (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) was removed at second procedure with the ESD technique, including over-the-scope clip. The R0 resection rate for deployed clips was 90 % (18 of 20). There were two superficial esophageal tears from FTRD insertion that required no therapy. No bleeding occurred during the postoperative period. Conclusions Upper gastrointestinal EFTR using the colonic Ovesco FTRD is feasible without pre-dilation of the upper esophageal sphincter or pylorus. This study further confirms acceptable efficacy and safety in upper gastrointestinal use.