Teat Sealant Research Articles

Association of Cow Drying off Practices with Milk Yield and Udder Health Outcomes in Peri-Urban Smallholder Dairy Herds

In peri-urban smallholder dairy herds, farmers face challenges in drying off cows due to a lack of evidence-based recommendations. This study examined the associations between cow drying-off practices, mean milk yield at drying off and during early successive lactation, and the odds of mastitis and udder leakage cases in herds around Nakuru city, Kenya. A cross-sectional survey of 232 cows across 172 herds was conducted. Mean milk yield was determined using a general linear model, while the odds ratios for mastitis and udder leakage were estimated using a binary logistic regression model, with drying-off practice, cow breed, and dairy management intensification as explanatory variables. All the three explanatory variables were significantly associated (p<0.05) with mean milk yield at drying off, early successive lactation, and the occurrence of mastitis and udder leakages. Cessation of milking (57.3%) was more common than abrupt cessation (42.7%). Mean milk yield was 2.6 liters/day at drying off and 13.4 liters/day during early successive lactation. Teat sealants were applied to cows producing more than 5 liters/day, while gradual reduction in milking, complete cessation of milking, or dry-cow therapy was used for cows producing less than 3 liters/day. During early successive lactation, cows dried off using teat sealant, salt application, stopping concentrate feeding, or gradual reduction in milking produced more milk (14 liters/day) than those dried off by abrupt cessation or dry-cow therapy (10-12 liters/day).Relative to abrupt cessation, the odds of mastitis and udder leakage were lower (p<0.05) with dry-cow therapy (odds ratio 0.12; 0.12), gradual cessation of milking (odds ratio 0.22; 0.29), or stopping concentrate feeding (odds ratio 0.14; 0.26). The study found that gradual reduction in milking (47%) and abrupt cessation of milking (22%) were the most common drying-off practices. These methods are effective for cows producing less than 3 liters/day at the start of drying off and do not result in milk loss during early successive lactation. However, abrupt cessation of milking is more likely to result in poor udder health outcomes. Though teat sealant was rarely used (3.9%), it proved effective for cows producing more than 5 liters/day, maintaining milk production and udder health during early successive lactation. These findings provide crucial insights for farmers on selecting appropriate drying-off practices to optimize milk yield and udder health.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Use on Chinese Dairy Farms: Awareness and Opinions Regarding Selective Treatments of Farm Managers.

In China's expanding dairy industry, a lack of oversight regarding antimicrobial use and increasing antimicrobial resistance are evident. Selective treatments of dairy cows for clinical mastitis or dry cow therapy are proposed to promote judicious antimicrobial use without adversely impacting cattle health. These approaches have been successfully implemented on farms in other countries. On 28 October 2023, a 2-day in-person seminar was held in Beijing, China, on selective antimicrobial treatments of dairy cows for clinical mastitis or dry cow therapy on large Chinese dairy farms. Concurrently, a qualitative study involving 15 technical managers from the 13 largest Chinese dairy groups used focus group discussions and questionnaires to explore perspectives on selective treatments of dairy cows for clinical mastitis or dry cow therapy. The main outcomes assessed were opinions and concerns regarding implementing selective antimicrobial treatments. Although there was diversity of cognition on AMR and selective treatments, the technical managers were generally positive regarding adoption of selective treatments. However, they expressed a need for more evidence and tools, including anticipated economic impacts, effects of delaying treatment until diagnosis, accurate interpretation of milk recording data, safe use of internal teat sealants, and spread of pathogens. Participants stressed the need for awareness, staff training, farm management, and China-specific standards, suggesting large-scale trials to assess efficacy of selective treatments. The findings revealed key challenges and barriers currently impeding selective AMU practices. These insights could inform efforts to promote judicious AMU on farms through targeted treatment regimens, reducing mounting selective pressure driving resistance.

Aloe arborescens supplementation in drying-off dairy cows: influence on rumen, rectum and milk microbiomes

BackgroundIn the context of the RABOLA project, which aimed to identify operational practices that lead to the reduction of antibiotic use in dairy cattle farming, lyophilised Aloe arborescens was administered orally to cows during the dry-off and peripartum periods. In this specific paper we wanted to examine whether oral administration of Aloe arborescens, in combination with the topical application of a teat sealant could exert an effect on the microbial populations of three cow microbiomes (rumen, milk, rectum), between dry-off and peripartum. Dry-off and peripartum are critical physiological phases of the cow’s life, where both the mammary gland and the gastrointestinal tract undergo dramatic modifications, hence the relevance of evaluating the effects of dietary treatments.MethodsThirty multiparous dairy cows were randomly allocated to three groups: Control (antibiotic treatment and internal teat sealant), Sealant (only internal teat sealant) and Aloe (internal teat sealant and Aloe arborescens homogenate administered orally). For 16S rRNA gene sequencing, rumen, rectum and milk samples were collected, not synchronously, at the most critical timepoints around dry-off and calving, considering the physiological activity of each biological site.ResultsThe rumen microbiome was predominantly characterized by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes followed by Proteobacteria, while the rectum exhibited a prevalence of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The milk microbiome mainly comprised Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Alistipes spp., Ruminococcaceae UCG-10 group, Prevotellaceae UCG-001 group, and Bacteroides spp., involved in cellulose and hemicellulose degradation, enhancement of energy metabolism, and peptide breakdown, showed increment in the rectum microbiome with Aloe supplementation. The rectum microbiome in the Aloe group exhibited a significant increase in the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio and alpha-diversity at seven days after dry-off period. Beta-diversity showed a significant separation between treatments for the rectum and milk microbiomes. Aloe supplementation seemed to enrich milk microbial composition, whereas the Sealant group showed greater diversity compared to the Control group, albeit this included an increase in microorganisms frequently associated with mastitis.ConclusionsAloe arborescens administration during the dry-off period did not demonstrate any observable impact on the microbial composition of the rumen, a finding further supported by volatilome analysis. Instead, the oral Aloe supplementation at dry-off appears to significantly influence the composition of the dairy cow rectum and milk microbiomes in the following lactation.

Dairy farmer income, working time, and antimicrobial use under different dry cow therapy protocols

Mastitis is one of the most common diseases of dairy cattle. It has a high impact on farm economy, farmers' working time, and antimicrobial usage (AMU). Selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) is an effective means of reducing AMU without negatively affecting udder health. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of SDCT implementation on farmer's income, working time, and AMU, using a bioeconomic model. A stochastic dairy simulation model (DairyHealthSim) based on a weekly model was used to simulate herd dynamics, reproduction, milk production, culling decisions, health outcomes, and the management of health events. A specific module was developed for the simulation of quarter-level intramammary infection (IMI) acquisition and elimination during the lactation and dry-off periods, and 25 different farm settings were defined to represent herds with various udder health situations. We then defined 20 scenarios of SDCT by combining both the use of different thresholds of somatic cell count and milk bacteriology for treatment allocation and the use of internal teat sealant (ITS). All SDCT protocols had a low impact on farmer's income, and we identified some protocols with a positive farm gross margin (up to 15.83 CA$/dried- cow). We also found that adding an ITS to all cows led to greater economic gain. The application of SDCT had a low impact on farmers' working time, except when milk bacteriology was used for decision-making. Antimicrobial treatment to all cows above 200,000 cells/mL at last control, with the use of ITS on all cows, seems a good choice in most dairy farms. These findings could be used to convince farmers to adopt this strategy at dry-off.

Postpartum excretion of internal teat sealant after selective dry cow treatment of dairy cows

Postpartum excretion of internal teat sealant after selective dry cow treatment of dairy cows

Udder health outcomes in Irish herds participating in CellCheck dry cow consults

The CellCheck Dry Cow Consult (DCC) was developed by the CellCheck Technical Working Group to enable farmers to engage with their nominated vet to develop farm-specific selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) plans, where appropriate. This study evaluated the effect of the DCC on farmer decision-making around dry cow therapy, and the udder health impact of implementing SDCT, in study herds over the 2019 and 2020 dry periods. The DCC was a 3-h consult, delivered and funded as part of the Targeted Advisory Service on Animal Health (TASAH). Herds that completed a DCC were invited to register for a Dry Cow Review the following year. The combined data set for analysis across both years comprised of 439 herds and 25,357 cows. Available herd size ranged from 25 to 800. The median SCC of cows dried off with teat sealant only was 47,000 cells/ml before drying off in 2019 and 48,000 cells/ml at first milk recording in 2020, and 43,000 cells/ml before drying off in 2020 and 39,000 cells/ml at first milking recording in 2021. Following both the 2019 and 2020 dry periods, cows tended to converge toward a similar median SCC early in the following lactation, irrespective of prior dry cow treatment strategy. The uptake of SDCT was greater in Review herds, with 21% of cows receiving teat sealant only in 2020, compared with 16.3% of cows in herds participating in a Consult for the first time in 2020. At an individual cow level, in both years dry period new infection rate (NIR) was approximately 2.7% higher for cows treated with teat sealant only, than for those treated with both dry cow antibiotic tubes and teat sealant, and 1.2% higher than cows treated with antibiotic only. Regardless of treatment, there was a significant association between increasing parity and the risk of a dry period new infection. Increasing herd size had a statistically significant effect on the risk of dry period new infection rates. At a herd level, there was no statistically significant increase in NIR when SDCT was used compared with herds where blanket dry cow therapy was used. While not without risk, SDCT can be successfully implemented in Irish herds; however, constant attention to hygiene and management is essential. Though there are challenges to face, facilitating continued farmer education and engagement with professional guidance will be important.

Untargeted metabolomics and metagenomics reveal signatures for intramammary ceftiofur treatment and lactation stage in the cattle hindgut.

The gut microbiota in cattle is essential for protein, energy, and vitamin production and hence, microbiota perturbations can affect cattle performance. This study evaluated the effect of intramammary (IMM) ceftiofur treatment and lactation stage on the functional gut microbiome and metabolome. Forty dairy cows were enrolled at dry-off. Half received IMM ceftiofur and a non-antibiotic teat sealant containing bismuth subnitrate (cases), while the other half received the teat sealant (controls). Fecal samples were collected before treatment at dry off, during the dry period (weeks 1 and 5) and the first week after calving (week 9). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was applied to predict microbial metabolic pathways whereas untargeted metabolomics was used identify polar and nonpolar metabolites. Compared to controls, long-term changes were observed in the cows given ceftiofur, including a lower abundance of microbial pathways linked to energy production, amino acid biosynthesis, and other vital molecules. The metabolome of treated cows had elevated levels of stachyose, phosphatidylethanolamine diacylglycerol (PE-DAG), and inosine a week after the IMM ceftiofur application, indicating alterations in microbial fermentation, lipid metabolism, energy, and cellular signaling. Differences were also observed by sampling, with cows in late lactation having more diverse metabolic pathways and a unique metabolome containing higher levels of histamine and histamine-producing bacteria. These data illustrate how IMM ceftiofur treatment can alter the functionality of the hindgut metabolome and microbiome. Understanding how antibiotics and lactation stages, which are each characterized by unique diets and physiology, impact the function of resident microbes is critical to define normal gut function in dairy cattle.

The association between somatic cell count and selective dry cow therapy, milking routine, and dry cow management practices in early-lactation cows from 21 commercial grazing dairy herds

This observational study aimed to explore the association of farmer-driven selective dry cow therapy (DCT), milking routine and dry cow management practices with SCC in early-lactation cows from 21 commercial dairy herds. Milking routine practices evaluated referred to cow preparation for milking, in-lactation mastitis management, and recording. Dry cow management practices related to dry cow environment and cleaning, dry-off procedure, milk cessation strategy and calving environment. Data from 2,016 multiparous cows in 21 commercial spring-calving grazing dairy herds were available for the study. Herd owners self-reported DCT (the assignment and administration of DCT was at the discretion of the herd owners with no involvement from the research team), management practices during milking and the dry period. Cow-level last test-day SCC records in 2020 (range = 105-285 DIM) and first test-day records in 2021 (range = 5-60 DIM) were obtained from milk recording databases. Quarter-level milk sampling was carried out on all cows in late lactation of 2020 (range = 240-261 DIM) for bacterial culturing. Bacteriological results were used to define cows with IMI when ≥1 quarter sample resulted in bacterial growth and there were no contaminated samples from that cow. Mixed model analyses were used to evaluate the association of selective DCT, milking routine, and dry cow management practices with cows' first test-day log 10 SCC (logSCC) in 2021. At dry-off in 2020, 47.6% of the cows were administered an internal teat sealant alone (ITS), while 52.4% were administered an antibiotic plus an internal teat sealant (AB+ITS). The mean herd-level percentage of cows with IMI was 19.7% (range = 9.8%-39.5%); Staphylococcus aureus accounted for the majority of cow-level IMI (89.9%, 357/397). Between herds, the proportion of cows administered ITS ranged from 17.7% (14/79; in a herd with an IMI prevalence of 10.1%) to 86.8% (66/76; in a herd with an IMI prevalence of 27.6%). In total, 11.8% (105/889) and 29.8% (292/980) of cows that were administered ITS or AB+ITS had an IMI in late lactation 2020, respectively. The mean untransformed SCC at the last test day in 2020 of cows administered ITS and AB+ITS was 55,000 and 197,200 cells/mL, respectively. The statistical analysis showed a significant interaction between selective DCT and milk yield at last test-day in 2020; cows with a milk yield of 15 kg and administered ITS had a 0.1 higher (untransformed SCC of 19,000 cells/mL higher) first test-day logSCC compared with cows administered AB+ITS. Additionally, greater parity, IMI in late lactation, higher logSCC at the last test-day in 2020 and longer dry periods were associated with higher logSCC at the first test-day in 2021. The current study identified cow- and herd-level management practices that could aid dairy farmers in improving the outcome of selective DCT and decrease early lactation SCC.

Redefining on-farm practices: The perceived effect of a responsible antimicrobial use regulation on dairy farmers

The global food animal industry faces a growing concern regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR), primarily driven by the use of antimicrobials (AM) for the treatment, control, and prevention of diseases. Addressing this challenge requires promoting responsible antimicrobial use (AMU) practices. In 2019, the province of Québec, Canada, took a significant step by implementing a regulation that limits the use of AM of very high importance for human medicine (category I AM as defined by Health Canada) in the food animal industry. However, the implementation of such regulation can significantly influence behavioral shifts among producers, contributing to the wider effort against AMR. Therefore, the objective of this observational study was to describe the perceived changes in dairy producers' knowledge and on-farm practices following the implementation of this regulation, using a cohort design. Data collection involved administering questionnaires to 87 dairy producers from 3 regions of the province of Québec (Estrie, Montérégie, Centre-Du-Québec) before (2017-2018) and after (2020-2021) the implementation of the regulation. The questionnaires explored the descriptive characteristics of farms, the knowledge of producers about the categorization of AM, the on-farm treatment practices, and the perceived effects of the regulation. Statistical analysis included t-tests and McNemar tests to compare the paired data obtained using the 2 questionnaires. The results indicated an increase in the knowledge score (the number of AM correctly categorized by the producers by their importance for human medicine) after the implementation of the regulation, suggesting an improved understanding of the categorization of AM based on their importance for human medicine. Trends in AMU practices for treating clinical mastitis and reproductive diseases suggested that category I AM were less likely to be reported as the primary treatment after the regulation, whereas category II AM were more often reported as primary treatment. Adoption of the selective dry cow therapy method significantly increased, whereas the use of teat sealants remained unchanged. Moreover, producers had divergent perceptions regarding the effect of the regulation on the cure rates and disease frequencies. This disparity emphasizes the need for comprehensive data collection to discern the risks associated with such regulatory shifts. The study acknowledges several limitations, including the potential for recall bias, confirmation bias, and desirability bias. Despite these limitations, this study shows that implementing regulations to encourage responsible AMU drives positive transformations in producers' knowledge and on-farm practices. This underscores the pivotal effect of proactive interventions in combating the escalating threat of AMR within the global food animal industry.

A randomized, controlled trial examining quarter-level somatic cell count and culture-based selective dry cow therapy against blanket dry cow therapy on early lactation production outcomes

The objective of this study was to determine quarters requiring antimicrobial treatment using either a benchtop somatic cell counter or culture with gram-positive selective media and compare the outcomes in these cows to those receiving blanket dry cow therapy (BDCT) in a randomized, controlled trial. We evaluated 2 novel methods of identifying cows with intramammary infections followed by selective antimicrobial treatment at a commercial dairy farm to determine their usefulness in decreasing antibiotic usage during the dry period without significant detrimental effects on milk quality and production. Cows (n = 840) were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups (BDCT, gram-positive selective media culture-based selective dry cow therapy [C-SDCT], and somatic cell count-based SDCT [S-SDCT]) the day before dry-off, and quarter-level milk samples (QLMS) were collected. The QLMS from cows in the S-SDCT group were evaluated using the cell counter, and quarters were treated if SCC was ≥200,000 cells/mL, whereas the QLMS from cows in the C-SDCT group were cultured, and quarters were treated if the culture showed growth. All cows in the BDCT received antimicrobial therapy, and all cows received an internal teat sealant regardless of treatment group. Outcomes measured were first and second DHIA test SCC, milk production through 60 DIM, cows leaving the farm, clinical mastitis, and bacteriologic new infections in a subset of quarters. Cows in both SDCT groups had fewer antimicrobial treatments than cows in the BDCT group as was expected, and cows in the C-SDCT group had fewer treatments than those in the S-SDCT group. Cows in both SDCT groups had a higher linear score at the first DHIA test (BDCT: 1.8, S-SDCT: 2.2, C-SDCT: 2.2); however, we found no other differences between groups regarding any other outcomes measured. Although antimicrobial use was significantly reduced, farms should use caution in adopting the benchtop analyzer and the selective media described in this study as ways to identify infected cows for dry cow therapy because they may result in increased linear scores early in lactation.

The effect of selective dry cow therapies based on 2 different algorithms on antimicrobial use, udder health, milk production, and culling in the absence of internal teat sealant use at dry-off

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) strategies based on 2 different algorithms as compared with blanket dry-cow therapy for measures of udder health, milk yield, and culling in herds not using internal teat sealant. Cows from 2 commercial farms in West Texas were randomized into 3 different groups: SDCT Algorithm 1 (ALG1; n = 455) cows treated with an intramammary antimicrobial at dry-off if somatic cell count (SCC) > 200,000 cells/mL at any Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA) test date or if the cow had 2 or more cases of clinical mastitis during the enrollment lactation; SDCT Algorithm 2 (ALG2; n = 458) cows treated with an intramammary antimicrobial at dry-off if SCC >200,000 cell/mL at last test date or any case of clinical mastitis during the enrollment lactation; Control cows (CON = 447) received blanket dry cow therapy. All cows enrolled in the study did not receive an internal or external teat sealant. Data related to milk and somatic cell count linear score (LSCC) was collected monthly. Milk yield and LSCC during the first 6 mo of lactation were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA models, while Cox's Proportional Hazards models were fitted to culling and clinical mastitis data. The farm was fitted as a random effect in all models. The percentage of cows receiving antimicrobials at dry cow was 51.3, 24.7, and 100% for ALG1, ALG2, and CON, respectively. Treatment did not influence the IMI dynamics during the dry period. Additionally, no statistical differences related to treatment were observed for LSCC and milk yield. The LSCC for ALG1, ALG2, and CON was 2.44, 2.41, and 2.26, respectively. The average milk yield for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows was 43.2, 43.2, and 44.0 kg/d, respectively. Treatment did not affect clinical mastitis incidence and culling. The cumulative incidence of clinical mastitis was 19.6%, 19.4%, and 21.4% for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows respectively. Additionally, the cumulative risk of death or culling was 18.5%, 17.1%, and 19.5% for ALG1, ALG2, and CON cows respectively. In conclusion, SDCT strategies led to a decrease in antimicrobial drug use at dry-off, without significantly impacting the incidence of clinical mastitis, the risk of culling, LSCC and milk yield of dairy cows. However, numerical differences in LSCC and milk yield were observed between treatment groups.

Efficacy of internal and external teat sealants on cure and new infection risk in dry-off protocols for Holstein cows

Internal teat sealant products have been used alone or in combination with antibiotic dry cow treatment to prevent new IMI over the dry period in dairy cows. Conversely, knowledge about the efficacy of external teat sealants in the prevention of IMI is scarce. The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of 2 different teat sealants, one internal teat sealant and one external teat sealant, on the (1) risk of new IMI during the dry period, (2) risk of IMI cure, (3) first test day linear somatic cell score, (4) first test day milk yield, (5) incidence of farm-diagnosed clinical mastitis ≤ 30 DIM, and (6) incidence of culling ≤ 30 DIM. In a randomized clinical trial, Holstein cows (n = 1,500) from one commercial dairy were assigned to treatment and control groups. At dry off, cows in the treatment groups received an antibiotic dry cow treatment in combination with either an internal teat sealant (INT) or a single application of an external teat sealant (EXT). Control (CON) cows received the antibiotic dry cow treatment alone. Data on linear somatic cell score from the last DHI test day before dry off and the first test after calving, first test day milk yield, and the occurrence of farm-diagnosed clinical mastitis and culling ≤ 30 DIM were obtained from the farm management program. New IMI and cure of IMI during the dry period were calculated. Linear somatic cell score (mean ± SD) at first test day after calving differed among groups and was 3.2 ± 2.2 in CON, 2.8 ± 2.0 in INT, and 3.0 ± 2.1 in EXT groups. The risk of new IMI differed among groups and was 30.2% for CON cows, 18.2% for INT cows, and 22.6% for EXT cows. A Poisson regression analysis revealed that, compared with CON cows, the risks of new IMI were 40% lower for INT cows (risk ratio (RR) = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.88) and 25% lower for EXT cows (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.52 to 1.07). By contrast, no meaningful differences were documented for cure risk, clinical mastitis risk during the first 30 DIM, or culling risk within the first 30 DIM. In summary, cows dried off with an INT in combination with antibiotic dry cow treatment had a lower linear somatic cell score at first test day after calving and reduced risk of new IMI than cows dried off with an EXT in addition to antibiotic dry cow treatment or cows dried off using antibiotic dry cow treatment alone. Further, we found supporting evidence that cows dried off with an EXT in addition to antibiotic dry cow treatment might have an advantage in reduced new IMI over cows dried off with an antibiotic dry cow treatment alone.

Variation in partial direct costs of dry cow therapy on 37 large dairy herds

The objective of this observational study was to estimate partial direct costs of dry cow antibiotic therapy (DCT) protocols used on 37 large dairy herds in Wisconsin and to estimate the potential monetary savings and reduction in antimicrobial usage (AMU) if selective DCT was used. Partial direct costs of DCT were calculated using costs of intramammary (IMM) antimicrobials and teat sealants. Data were retrospectively collected on 37 large dairy farms for a period of one year and included the total number of cows dried-off, types of IMM antimicrobial used, and product prices (obtained from farm invoices). A single farm visit was performed to verify data. Clinical mastitis (CM) and SCC history across lactation were used as the criteria to identify cows eligible to receive only teat sealants (no antibiotic DCT) based on adoption of a hypothetical selective DCT program. Descriptive statistics were performed using PROC MEANS to summarize continuous herd and cow characteristics. Differences in costs among IMM antibiotic products and eligibility to not receive antibiotics at dry off by parity were analyzed using ANOVA. Differences in milk yield at the last test day and DIM at dry-off based on eligibility for selective DCT were analyzed using PROC MIXED. A total of 35,691 cows were dried-off across all herds (n = 37) and most of the herds used IMM antibiotic DCT at dry-off in most of the cows. Teat sealant was used as part of the dry-off protocol in all but 3 herds. Of the enrolled farms, 30 used blanket antibiotic DCT in all quarters of all cows and 7 herds used selective DCT with no administration of antibiotics given to 0.8% to 58% of the dry cows within herd. Across all farms, the average cost of products given per dried cow was $19.57 ± 0.64 and ranged from $8.72 to $24.04. As expected, the cost per dried cow was greater ($23.45 ± 0.38) in herds that used higher-cost intramammary antibiotics as compared with herds that used lower-cost intramammary antibiotics ($16.64 ± 0.40). When using an algorithm based on udder health records to hypothetically select cows that would be eligible to receive teat sealants only (no antibiotic DCT), eligibility ranged from 27.3% to 93.3% within-herds and varied by parity, milk yield at last test day, and DIM at dry-off. If a selective DCT program based on udder health records was used, an overall reduction of $5.37 (27% of total costs) per dry cow would be expected. Likewise, adoption of selective DCT based on udder health records would reduce AMU at dry off by approximately 51%. However, neither of these estimates included potential adverse health complications (such as increased clinical mastitis) that can occur if selective DCT programs are not effectively performed. Variations in partial direct costs at dry-off were observed among herds based on treatment protocols. In herds that have good udder health management and contagious mastitis pathogens controlled, adoption of selective DCT based on SCC and history of clinical mastitis can reduce AMU and partial direct costs of dry cow management.

Selective dry cow therapy on dairy farms in Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland and Hesse, Germany - a survey among farmers

With the Regulation (EC) 6/2019, antibiotic drying off of the entire dairy herd is no longer permissible. Hence, it is necessary to establish selective antibiotic drying off (SDCT: Selective Dry Cow Therapy) in dairy herds. With the publication of the PraeRi study in 2020, systematic data for the implementation of SDCT on farms became available for several German states. For Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland and Hesse this type of information is only available from individual projects. Therefore, the aim of this survey was to increase the knowledge concerning the implementation of SDCT in dairy farms located in these states. An online questionnaire was sent via newsletters to farmers and was published in the regional farmers' bulletins in the described catchment area. The questionnaire inquired about the saving of antibiotics during drying off, the criteria guiding the farmer's decision (cell count from monthly dairy herd improvement data (DHI), mastitis history, microbiological examination of quarter foremilk samples, California mastitis test), use of teat sealants and the type of dry off procedure (abrupt/gradual). A total of 103 questionnaires were evaluated, making the response rate ~1% for Hesse, ~3% for Saarland, and ~5% for Rhineland-Palatinate based on the number of included farms. Approximately 29% of the farmers dried off one out of four cows, 20% half, 23% three out of four and 13% all cows without using antibiotics. Eighty-nine farm managers based their decision on the somatic cell counts of DHI. Additional criteria influencing the decision were the mastitis history, results of the California Mastitis Test, or a combination of both. In 76 farms cows were dried off abruptly. In 79 farms teat sealers were used. Application of SDCT is established in most of the farms that participated in the survey, even though the proportion varied between farms. Legal requirements are not the only reason farmers need to increasingly deal with SDCT; sustainability programs of the dairies rely on selective drying off as well. Herd veterinarians should be supportive in implementing these measures to achieve good udder health while reducing the use of antimicrobials to a necessary minimum.

Efficacy of an internal teat sealant alone or in combination with an intramammary antibiotic during the dry period treatment in dairy cows

In this study, the aim was to determine the effectiveness of internal teat sealant applied at the dry-off in preventing the formation of subclinical mastitis and to investigate whether this product could be a non-antibiotic alternative to total dry cow treatment. A total of 195 quarters from 52 Holstein and Holstein Crossbreed dairy cows, that did not have clinical mammary infection and were expected to calve within 60 days were used in the study. The quarters were divided into 3 treatment groups as follows: Group 1 (ANTB; n = 64): dry period intramammary antibiotic suspension (Ubrostar®); Group 2 (ORB; n = 65), internal teat sealant (Orbeseal®); and Group 3 (ANTB-ORB; n = 66) intramammary antibiotic and teat sealant combination were performed. All of the quarters were checked for subclinical mastitis on the 20th, 40th and 60th days of lactation. The percentage of animals found to be CMT negative on the 20th day of lactation was 80.65% in G1 (ANTB), 83.60% in Group 2 (ORB), and 87.50% in Group 3 (ANTB-ORB), respectively. There was no quarter with CMT +3 score in G1 and G3, but it was determined in one quarter in G2 (ORB). On the 60th day there were no quarters with CMT +2 and +3 scores in both G1 and G2. No statistically significant difference was found between the CMT results of treatment groups on the 20th, 40th and 60th days of lactation (p > 0.05). In conclusion, it was determined that bismuth subnitrate-based teat canal sealer provided good protection against subclinical mastitis rate in drying healthy udder quarters. However, especially in high risk groups it is important to closely monitor udder health with SCC and/or CMT applications before the dry period and to choose the dry period treatment.

Randomized equivalence study evaluating the efficacy of two commercially available teat sealants in dairy cows

Use of internal teat sealants is common in the U.S. to prevent new intramammary infections during the dry period. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a new internal teat sealant containing bismuth subnitrate (SOa) to the first product introduced to the U.S. dairy industry (ORBb). The hypothesis was completed using a multi-site randomized, positively controlled equivalence evaluation of new intramammary infection risk difference over the dry period. At dry-off, milk samples were collected for culture and then cloxacillin benzathinec was administered, followed by the randomly assigned internal teat sealant (SO = 404 cows; ORB = 418 cows). After calving, repeat milk samples were collected. The effect of treatment on quarter-level new intramammary infection risk, cured intramammary infection risk, and risk of presence of intramammary infection post-calving was determined using generalized linear mixed models. The effects of treatment on cow-level outcomes, including incidence of clinical mastitis, culling and death, and performance in early lactation based on test-day milk production and somatic cell count, were also evaluated. The dry period new intramammary infection adjusted risk difference (SO minus ORB) was -1.60% (95% CI -5.62, 2.42). Final models demonstrated that there was no difference in risk rates of quarter-level outcomes between treatment groups. Analysis of cow-level factors, including clinical mastitis, culling and death rate within the first 120 DIM, also revealed no differences. Results of this study indicate that SO was equivalent to ORB for dry period new intramammary infection risk when utilizing blanket dry cow therapy.

Evaluation of internal teat sealant persistence in the mammary gland during the dry period

The aim of this study was to characterize the behavior of 2 commercially available internal teat sealants containing bismuth subnitrate (SOa and ORBb) during the dry- and postfresh periods in dairy cattle. Digital radiography was used to monitor location and percentage of teat cistern fill at dry-off and during the dry period. Teat-level health parameters including infection status at dry-off and post-fresh as well as incidence of clinical mastitis were also assessed. Radiographic imaging revealed that 21.1% of teats had sealant present in the gland cistern at dry-off (SO= 23.6%, ORB = 18.5%) which increased to 55.9% (SO = 59.6%, ORB = 52.2%) at pre-fresh imaging. Quarters with sealant that had migrated into the gland shed noticeable amounts of sealant for twice as long (mean 14.34 milkings), compared to quarters that did not have sealant in the gland (mean: 7.12, P < 0.001). There was no correlation between sealant location and intramammary infection at dry-off or post-fresh, nor did sea ant location impact clinical mastitis in the first 120 days in milk. Milk leakage after dry-off also was not correlated with an increased risk of intramammary infection during the dry or post-fresh periods. There was no difference between treatments in any of the parameters evaluated. Prolonged sealant shedding is a common reason that producers cite for not utilizing internal teat sealant products in their dry-off protocols. Further research is indicated to determine the optimal amount of sealant required to provide protection while minimizing post-fresh shedding.

Checklist-based approach to measure milker behavior before and after training

So far, evaluation of training initiatives for dairy farm employees has been limited to the reaction and learning level. The effect of training on dairy farm employees' behavior has not been studied yet. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of online training to change employee behavior toward best-practice routines. An interactive training course related to udder health was developed in 5 modules in Spanish and English: (1) collecting an aseptic milk sample, (2) administering intramammary treatment, (3) deciding on salable milk, (4) treating a cow at dry-off with antibiotics, and (5) administering teat sealants. Participants navigated the modules at their own pace or watched a narrated video. Employees were assessed performing 2 procedures related to dry cow treatment (i.e., treating a cow at dry-off with antibiotics, administering internal teat sealant) by using an objective structured clinical examination. If possible, all employees were scored performing the procedure on 2 cows before and within 2 to 3 wk after the training was applied.

Approach to Selective Dry Cow Therapy in Early Adopter Italian Dairy Farms: Why Compliance Is So Important.

Selective dry-cow therapy (SDCT) became mandatory in Italy on 28 January 2022. During 2020, a group of farms involved in a milk quality program began a pilot experiment with SDCT in order to understand its challenges and to identify areas for procedural improvements. The aim of this study was to describe the challenges and results of the SDCT in early adopters' herds with a special focus on treatment compliance. Retrospective data from 1911 cows from 11 dairy herds were evaluated. Somatic cell counts, clinical mastitis (CM) history, and the California Mastitis Test (CMT) were used as criteria for SDCT. Based on the dairy herd improvement test results and CM history, 48% of all cows should have received antibiotic treatments and internal teat sealants. Adding the CMT at dry-off increased the percentage of antibiotic-treated cows to 62%, with relevant variation among farms. Concerning treatment compliance, 21% of the cows were "non-compliant", suggesting the importance of monitoring treatment compliance. In conclusion, even if commonly used selection criteria for antibiotic treatments were used, the need for more education and in-depth monitoring of the SDCT adoption process was clearly identified. Close collaboration and agreement between veterinarians and farmers are key for SDCT adoption success.

Persistent effects of intramammary ceftiofur treatment on the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance in dairy cattle

BackgroundIntramammary (IMM) ceftiofur treatment is commonly used in dairy farms to prevent mastitis, though its impact on the cattle gut microbiome and selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has not been elucidated. Herein, we enrolled 40 dairy (Holstein) cows at the end of the lactation phase for dry-cow therapy: 20 were treated with IMM ceftiofur (Spectramast®DC) and a non-antibiotic internal teat sealant (bismuth subnitrate) and 20 (controls) received only bismuth subnitrate. Fecal grab samples were collected before and after treatment (weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9) for bacterial quantification and metagenomic next-generation sequencing.ResultsOverall, 90% and 24% of the 278 samples had Gram-negative bacteria with resistance to ampicillin and ceftiofur, respectively. Most of the cows treated with ceftiofur did not have an increase in the number of resistant bacteria; however, a subset (25%) shed higher levels of ceftiofur-resistant bacteria for up to 2 weeks post-treatment. At week 5, the antibiotic-treated cows had lower microbiota abundance and richness, whereas a greater abundance of genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), CfxA, ACI-1, and CMY, was observed at weeks 1, 5 and 9. Moreover, the contig and network analyses detected associations between β-lactam resistance genes and phages, mobile genetic elements, and specific genera. Commensal bacterial populations belonging to Bacteroidetes most commonly possessed ESBL genes followed by members of Enterobacteriaceae.ConclusionThis study highlights variable, persistent effects of IMM ceftiofur treatment on the gut microbiome and resistome in dairy cattle. Antibiotic-treated cattle had an increased abundance of specific taxa and genes encoding ESBL production that persisted for 9 weeks. Fecal shedding of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, which was classified as a serious public health threat, varied across animals. Together, these findings highlight the need for additional studies aimed at identifying factors associated with shedding levels and the dissemination and persistence of antibiotic resistance determinants on dairy farms across geographic locations.