Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire Research Articles

The relationship between teamwork and moral distress among NICU nurses

BackgroundIn the demanding environment of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), quality nursing care hinges on effective teamwork and communication among nurses. However, this requirement for close cooperation can expose nurses to significant levels of moral distress. This study aims to explore the connection between the quality of teamwork and the experience of moral distress among NICU nurses.MethodsEmploying a cross-sectional, multicenter descriptive correlational design, this study surveyed female NICU nurses across the cities of Khorramabad and Semnan. Census sampling was utilized over five months, from July to November 2023, resulting in the participation of 190 nurses. Tools for data collection included demographic questionnaires, the Team-STEPPS Teamwork Perception Questionnaire (T-TPQ), and the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R) for nurses.ResultsThe findings revealed an average teamwork score of 3.73 ± 0.78, denoting an acceptable level, and an average moral distress score of 91.2 ± 56.7, indicating a low level. In multiple linear regression, marital status showed a direct positive correlation (β = 38.5, SE (β) = 9.3, p < 0.001), while the number of children (β = -14.6, SE (β) = 4.9, p = 0.003) and the teamwork score (β = -1.1, SE (β) = 0.12, p < 0.001) were inversely correlated with moral distress.ConclusionThe study’s results suggest that stronger teamwork among nurses correlates with reduced moral distress. Enhancing teamwork within NICUs could lead to policy development focused on the safety and quality of newborn care, also potentially alleviating moral distress experienced by nurses.

The effect of TeamSTEPPS® mobile-based training on perceptions of teamwork and team performance of operating room staff

IntroductionTeamSTEPPS® aims to create an environment where all members feel comfortable to speak about patient safety concerns. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of TeamSTEPPS® mobile-based training on the perceptions of teamwork and team performance of operating room staff. MethodsThis study was a quasi-experimental method with measurements at baseline and after 2 months of intervention. The research samples included 105 OR staff (operating room technologists, anesthesia technologists, and nurses) working in 6 teaching hospitals of Iran University of Medical Sciences in 2022, which were selected by stratified random method and proportional allocation. The research tools included the demographic form, the Persian version of the ‘TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perception Questionnaire’ (T-TPQ) and the Persian version of the ‘Team Performance Observation Tool’ (TPOT). The intervention was carried out with sending the link of the TeamSTEPPS® 2.0 course files to participants by mobile messengers so that they could study them during five sessions, with an interval of one week between each session. Data analysis was done by calculating descriptive statistics and paired t-test. ResultsThe results showed that TeamSTEPPS® mobile-based training significantly improved the perception of teamwork (P < 0.011) and team performance of operating room staff (P < 0.001). ConclusionWith the determination of the effect of TeamSTEPPS® mobile-based training on the perception of teamwork and team performance of operating room staff, it is suggested to present this training program to this group.

TeamSTEPPS improves patient safety

BackgroundExamine how Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) can be used to manage patient safety and improve the standard of care for patients.MethodsIn order to...

Adaptation of the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire into Turkish for a Nurse Sample: A Methodological Study

Adaptation of the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire into Turkish for a Nurse Sample: A Methodological Study

Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey

IntroductionMedical errors still plague healthcare. Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) and ORBB-simulation (ORBBSIM) are innovative emerging technologies which continuously capture as well as categorize intraoperative data, team information, and audio-visual files, in effort to improve objective quality measures. ORBB and ORBBSIM have an opportunity to improve patient safety, yet a paucity of implementation literature exists. Overcoming implementation barriers is critical. This study sought to obtain rich insights while identifying facilitators and barriers to adoption of ORBB and ORBBSIM in alignment with Donabedian’s model of health services and healthcare quality. Enrichment themes included translational performance improvement and real-world examples to develop sessions.MethodsInterprofessional OR staff were invited to complete two surveys assessing staff’s perceptions using TeamSTEPPS’s validated Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables, and inductive phenomenological content analysis was used for qualitative.ResultsSurvey 1 captured 71 responses from 334 invited (RR 21%) while survey 2 captured 47 responses from 157 (RR 29.9%). The T-TPQ score was 65.2, with Communication (70.4) the highest construct and Leadership (58.0) the lowest. Quality Improvement (QI), Patient Safety, and Objective Case Review were the most common perceived ORBB benefits. Trends suggested a reciprocal benefit of dual ORBB and ORBBSIM adoption. Trends also suggested that dual implementation can promote Psychological Safety, culture, trust, and technology comfort. The need for an implementation plan built on change management principles and a constructive culture were key findings.ConclusionsFindings supported ORBB implementation themes from previous literature and deepened our understanding through the exploration of team culture. This blueprint provides a model to help organizations adopt ORBB and ORBBSIM. Outcomes can establish an empirical paradigm for future studies.

Perceptions of Teamwork and Knowledge Attitudes of Hemodialysis Unit Nurses on Infection Prevention.

The Nurses of Hemodialysis Units: it is necessary to face HAIs (hospital-acquired infections) as a "well-tuned" teamwork. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions of the teamwork as well as the knowledge attitudes of the nurses of hemodialysis units on infection prevention in Greece. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a sample of 1018 HCWs (health care workers) of hemodialysis units in Greece. The questionnaires used were: Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) TeamSTEPPS®-Instructor Manual, and questionnaire APPENDIX A. The majority of them were nurses (69.45%) and nurse assistants (23.87%). About teamwork perceptions per factor, we observed uniformity in their responses with very high rates of agreement. The attitudes of nurses of hemodialysis units on the prevention of infections were distinguished in particularly high rates of compliance with a high perception of the risk of transmission of infections with better compliance being that of women. Also, women seem to be more knowledgeable about diseases that mostly affect the pediatric population. It seemed that level of knowledge between the two sexes did not differ regarding HBV (63.16% vs. 66.71%, p=0.430), HCV (63.91% vs. 66.71%, p=0.553), HIV infection (78.95% vs. 81.76%, p=0.471), and influenza (55.64% vs. 59.61%, p=0.394). This study highlighted for the first time the high level of perceptions of teamwork of the HCWs of the hemodialysis units in Greece. It is recommended to investigate the correct application of prevention measures and to detect the causes of deviation from good practices with subsequent investigations on hemodialysis units of Greece.

Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety culture and teamwork in intrapartum care: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundIn complex healthcare organizations, such as intrapartum care, both patient safety culture and teamwork are important aspects of patient safety. Patient safety culture is important for the values and norms shared by interprofessional teams in an organization, and such values are principles that guide team members’ behavior. The aim of this study was 1) to investigate differences in perceptions of patient safety culture and teamwork between professions (midwives, physicians, nursing assistants) and between labor wards in intrapartum care and 2) to explore the potential associations between teamwork and overall perceptions of patient safety and frequency of events reported. MethodsThe design was cross-sectional, using the Swedish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (14 dimensions) and the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (5 dimensions). Midwives, physicians, and nursing assistants in three labor wards in Sweden in 2018 were included. Descriptive statistics, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, two-way ANOVA, and standard multiple regression analysis were used.ResultsThe questionnaires were completed by 184 of the 365 healthcare professionals, giving a response rate of 50.4%. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant main effect of profession on two patient safety culture dimensions and one teamwork dimension and a significant main effect of labor ward on four patient safety culture dimensions and four teamwork dimensions. A significant interaction effect of profession and labor ward was found on four patient safety culture dimensions and four teamwork dimensions. The regression analysis revealed that four out of the five teamwork dimensions explained 40% of the variance in the outcome dimension ´Overall perceptions of patient safety´.ConclusionsThe results of the study indicate that profession and labor ward are important for healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient safety culture and teamwork in intrapartum care. Teamwork perceptions are significant for overall patient safety.

Influence of Mutual Support on Burnout among Intensive Care Unit Healthcare Professionals.

IntroductionBurnout among healthcare professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) is a serious issue that leads to early retirement and medication errors. Their gender, lower years of experience, and lower education have been reported as risk factors. Simultaneously, mutual support—commonly referred to as “back-up behavior,” in which staff members support each other—is critical for team performance. However, little is known about the influence of mutual support among ICU healthcare professionals on burnout. The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality refers to mutual support as the involvement of team members in: assisting one another, providing and receiving feedback, and exerting assertive and advocacy behaviors when patient safety is threatened.ObjectiveThis study aimed to verify the hypothesis that lower mutual support among ICU healthcare professionals is associated with increased probability of burnout.MethodsA web-based survey was conducted from March 4 to 20, 2021. All ICU healthcare professionals in Japan were included. An invitation was sent via the mailing list of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and asked to mail to local communities and social network services. We measured burnout severity using the Maslach Burnout-Human Services Survey and mutual support using the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire, as well as occupational background. The cutoff value for burnout was predefined and conducted logistic regression.ResultsWe received 335 responses, all of which were analyzed. The majority of respondents were nurses (58.5%), followed by physicians (18.5%) and clinical engineers (10.1%). The burnout group scored significantly lower on mutual support than the non-burnout group. After adjusting for covariates in a logistic regression, low mutual support was an independent factor predicting a high probability of burnout.ConclusionsThis study suggests that it is important to focus on mutual support among ICU healthcare professionals to reduce the frequency of burnout.

Perceptions of Teamwork in Schools of Nursing.

Characteristics of high-performing teams include shared purpose, clear vision, strong leadership, and the ability to use conflict management when needed. While many individuals who teach in schools of nursing come from the clinical setting where teamwork is normative, that same expectation of teamwork may not be present for the faculty as a whole. This study assessed perceptions of teamwork among faculty members in schools of nursing in 4 states in the Midwestern region of the United States. Perception of teamwork, related to communication, leadership, team structure, situation monitoring, and mutual support, was examined using a modified TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire. Perceptions of teamwork were highest for team structure and leadership, whereas communication, situation monitoring, and mutual support were lower. In addition, teamwork dimension scores were higher for those who previously participated in teamwork training. There are opportunities to improve teamwork in all domains. Teamwork skills are transferrable to different roles and across various situations; therefore once learned and fostered, these can impact the individual as well as improve the organizational climate.

Psychometric testing of the Iranian version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perception questionnaire: a cross-cultural validation study

BackgroundThe use of validated questionnaires to assess the perception of teamwork can be an early step in improving team training activities. Team-STEPPS® Teamwork Perception Questionnaire (T-TPQ) has been adapted and validated for hospital setting use in several countries. Due to linguistic and cultural differences, there is need to test the psychometrics of the adapted versions. However, no research have not yet assessed the psychometric properties of the Persian T-TPQ. Therefore, this study aims to assess the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of an Iranian version of the Team-STEPPS® Teamwork Perception Questionnaire (IR-T-TPQ).MethodsTo conduct this study, we undertook a cross-sectional survey approach between May 2020 and January 2021. In total, 404 nurses were recruited by convenience sampling technique from 10 teaching hospitals in Tabriz, Iran. Internal consistency reliability was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the construct validity of the instrument.ResultsCronbach’s alpha coefficients for each subscale were acceptable, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92, as well as for the total IR-T-TPQ (α = 0.96). The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a five-factor model, all of whose fit indices were acceptable, except for the goodness-of-fit index and normed fit index (χ2 (df) 1332 (550), p < 0.001, Normed chi-square (χ2/df) = 2.423, RMSEA = 0.059, TLI = 0.897, CFI = 0.904, AGFI = 0.814).ConclusionsThe psychometric properties of the IR-T-TPQ resulted in acceptable levels of internal consistency reliability and construct validity, respectively, in Iranian hospital nurses. Further study is needed to compare the teamwork level of nurses in various settings or to evaluate the effectiveness of the teamwork intervention using this validated and reliable tool.

Simulation-Based Training Program to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Teamwork Skills for the Urgent Care Clinic Staff.

Lack of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and effective team communication during cardiovascular emergencies could lead to poor patient outcomes and adverse events. Studies have shown that CPR psychomotor skills declined 3 months and plateaued up to 6 months after the completion of CPR training. The Urgent Care Clinic (UCC) interprofessional staff did not receive consistent training on CPR and teamwork skills beyond what was received from the biannual American Red Cross (ARC) Basic Life Support (BLS) training and semiannual Resuscitative Care Function mock cardiac arrest. Most participants took their last CPR training for more than 6 months (n = 12, 67%), between 3 and 6 months (n = 2, 11%), and within the last 3 months before the pre-intervention period (n = 4, 22%). The purpose of the project was to form an interprofessional team to lead the development and implementation of a theory- and evidence-based simulation-based training program to improve CPR and teamwork skills while enhancing patient safety and emergency medical readiness in the hospital and UCC. The quality improvement project utilized an interprofessional in situ simulation-based training to improve participants' CPR and teamwork skills. The UCC physicians, nurses, and medical technicians completed a CPR and teamwork simulation-based training with a high-fidelity mannequin, pre-simulation preparation, briefing, and debriefing. The project collected pre-intervention and post-intervention data for CPR competence and teamwork perceptions. A paired t-test was used to assess differences in participant CPR skills and Team Strategies to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire responses before and after the simulation-based training intervention. The 59th Medical Wing and the University of South Alabama Institutional Review Boards approved the quality improvement project. A total of 18 participants completed the ARC BLS and Team Strategies to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety simulation-based training. Most participants were medical technicians (n = 8, 44%), followed by physicians (n = 5, 28%) and (n = 5, 28%) nurses. There was a statistical significance in participants' ARC BLS scores, with a pre-simulation mean score of 45.42 and a post-simulation mean score of 89.21 (P = .000, 95% CI = 36.89-50.68). For Team Strategies to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety teamwork perceptions, there was a statistically significant increase in the participants' teamwork perception levels, with a pre-simulation mean score of 4.61 and a post-simulation mean score of 4.86 (P = .000, 95% CI = 0.20-0.31). Our results demonstrated that the participants' ARC BLS scores and UCC's team perceptions have increased after in situ simulation-based training. We did not assess the ideal time for re-training. We recommend a 3- to 6-month post-training assessment to determine the optimal time for a CPR and teamwork refresher training. A high-fidelity simulation-based program with trained facilitators that assess the healthcare providers' CPR and teamwork skills could enhance the delivery of high-quality CPR and execution of effective teamwork skills in their workplace.

Validation of a French-language version of TeamSTEPPS® T-TPQ and T-TAQ questionnaires

ABSTRACT Teamwork training and evaluation are essential to enhance safety and quality of care. The lack of the psychometric testing of the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ) and Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) across different language and cultural settings has questioned their widespread use because such attitudes and perceptions are highly subjective and context-bound. The present study aims to translate the T-TAQ and T-TPQ into the French language and validate the psychometric properties of the two questionnaires in a public health context. A forward-backward translation process, panel reviewing, and pilot testing in two rounds were followed to develop the French versions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s alpha were used to examine the factor structure and internal consistency, whereas two-way mixed Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was performed to assess test-retest reliability. A total of 235 healthcare professionals in the French-speaking community of Belgium completed the T-TAQ and T-TPQ. After two to four weeks, 102 participants took part in the second round. Despite good fit indices as revealed by the CFA and Cronbach’s alpha from 0.53 to 0.75 for the five dimensions of the T-TAQ and 0.76 to 0.79 for the T-TPQ, the squared correlations among the constructs were higher than the average variance extracted. Two-way mixed ICCs indicated fair to good test-retest reliability for all the five constructs of the two questionnaires, except the leadership scale of the T-TAQ. The French-language versions of the T-TAQ and T-TPQ were semantically equivalent and culturally relevant with adequate test-retest reliability as compared to the English versions. These two instruments might be used to capture the overall attitude toward teamwork and perceptions of team skills and behaviors. Yet, further research is advisable to refine the scales to establish the discriminant validity of the different dimensions and discriminative power of the instruments.

Staff Nurses 'Perception about Teamwork and its Effect on their Job Performance at Menoufia University Hospitals

Recently health care organizations are moving quickly from the concept of a hierarchical organization to one that depends on teams. Ultimately, teams succeed when they are supported by the organization and when they are provided with a clear standard of high- performance expectation. Purpose of the study: Assess the perception of staff nurses about teamwork and its effect on their job performance. Design: A descriptive correlational research design was utilized for this study. Setting: Menoufia University Hospital at Shebin-ELkom. Sampling: Convenience sample of 292 nurses were included at this study. Instruments: Two instruments were used for data collection: Instrument one; Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire. (TPQ), Instrument two; Observational checklist for measuring Job performance.Results: Nurses had a high perception level towards teamwork (87%). Also, 13% of studied nurses had a moderate perception level towards teamwork. In addition, about two thirds of studied nurses (65.80%) had a high performance level. Also, 34.20% of studied nurses had a moderate performance level. Conclusion: There was a positive highly statistical significant correlation between nurses' perception toward teamwork and their job performance. Recommendation: The hospital should provide effective and continuous training programs for nursing staff based on needs assessment to develop their knowledge and skills and consequently their teamwork and performance.

Nurses' perception of teamwork and its relationship with the occurrence and reporting of adverse events: A questionnaire survey in teaching hospitals.

To identify the levels of teamwork and its relationship with the occurrence and reporting of adverse events among Iranian nurses. Strengthening teamwork is emphasized worldwide for enhancing quality care and patient safety. This study applied a cross-sectional survey design. A total of 327 Iranian nurses from eight teaching hospitals participated in a self-administered survey using simple random sampling. The Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire was used to measure the teamwork. The frequency of occurrence and reporting of adverse events were measured with two questions. Data were analysed using descriptive analyses, independentt tests and logistic regression analysis. The mean teamwork score was 3.81 out of 5. Among the nurses, 48.0% had experienced adverse events in the past 6 months and 79.8% reported having an appropriate performance in adverse events reporting. Teamwork was significantly associated with lower occurrences of adverse events and better adverse events reporting. Specifically, nurses with higher situation monitoring (odds ratio (OR) = 0.47), mutual support (OR = 3.18) and team leadership (OR = 2.09) scores were more likely to report adverse events. Nurses with higher situation monitoring scores were less likely to experience the occurrence of adverse events (OR = 0.38). Nurses' perception of teamwork was moderate to high. Teamwork was associated with the occurrence and reporting of adverse events. Further study is needed to identify the effects of teamwork training on the learning outcomes, including teamwork, occurrence and the reporting of adverse events among nurses. Nursing managers should consider multiple educational strategies including structured teamwork training to improve staff nurses' teamwork competency. Administrative initiatives and quality improvement projects are needed to increase nurses' performance in the reporting of adverse events through an accreditation process.

A human factors intervention in a hospital - evaluating the outcome of a TeamSTEPPS program in a surgical ward

BackgroundPatient safety in hospitals is being jeopardized, since too many patients experience adverse events. Most of these adverse events arise from human factors, such as inefficient teamwork and communication failures, and the incidence of adverse events is greatest in the surgical area. Previous research has shown the effect of team training on patient safety culture and on different areas of teamwork. Limited research has investigated teamwork in surgical wards. The aim of this study was to evaluate the professional and organizational outcomes of a team training intervention among healthcare professionals in a surgical ward after 6 and 12 months. Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 was used as a conceptual framework for the study.MethodsThis study had a pre-post design with measurements at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of intervention. The intervention was conducted in a urology and gastrointestinal surgery ward in Norway, and the study site was selected based on convenience and the leaders’ willingness to participate in the project. Survey data from healthcare professionals were used to evaluate the intervention. The organizational outcomes were measured by the unit-based sections of the Hospital Survey of Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire, and professional outcomes were measured by the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire and the Collaboration and Satisfaction about Care Decisions in Teams Questionnaire. A paired t-test, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a generalized linear mixed model and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data.ResultsAfter 6 months, improvements were found in organizational outcomes in two patient safety dimensions. After 12 months, improvements were found in both organizational and professional outcomes, and these improvements occurred in three patient safety culture dimensions and in three teamwork dimensions. Furthermore, the results showed that one of the significant improved teamwork dimensions “Mutual Support” was associated with the Patient Safety Grade, after 12 months of intervention.ConclusionThese results demonstrate that the team training program had effect after 12 months of intervention. Future studies with larger sample sizes and stronger study designs are necessary to examine the causal effect of a team training intervention in this context.Trial registration numberISRCTN13997367 (retrospectively registered).

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire to measure teamwork perceptions of Chinese residents: a cross-sectional study

ObjectivesThe purpose of this research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perception Questionnaire (T-TPQ) among the Chinese residents.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingA clinical hospital of the China Medical University...

Evaluation of teamwork and its associated factors in the emergency rooms of Sousse - Tunisia

Abstract Background In recent years, patient safety has become a priority and a major target for improvement especially in the emergency rooms. According to the French National Authority for Health, 1/3 of serious adverse events could be avoided thanks to better coordination and better communication between the teams. Thus, this study aimed to describe the perceptions of healthcare professionals in the emergency rooms of Sousse-Tunisia regarding teamwork, and to determine the factors influencing it. Methods It is a descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted between December 2018 and April 2019. It included all the caregivers working in all the emergency rooms of Sousse-Tunisia. The measurement tool used in this study was “Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS)” Teamwork Perception Questionnaire. Data were coded and analyzed by The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0). Results A total of 110 participants were recruited with a participation rate of 72.36%. Nurses represent more than half of the respondents (56.4%). Average work experience was 7.27 years. The Teamwork overall score was 2.5±0.5. The most developed dimension was leadership (2.7±0.8) and the less developed dimension was communication (2.3±0.7). Women had a significantly higher overall score than men (2.6±0.5, 2.4±0.3, p = 0.017). Results also showed that emergency technicians have significantly higher overall score than doctors and nurses (p = 1 × 10-5). The overall score also varied significantly across the hospitals (p = 0.016). Conclusions Our results showed that the level of teamwork still needs to be improved. Furthermore, various factors are associated with teamwork, and that should be taken into consideration to guide the future interventions. Key messages There is a direct relationship between the quality of care and the effectiveness of teamwork. It is necessary to focus on the affecting factors of teamwork, in order to prevent adverse events.

Translation, reliability and validity of Japanese version the TeamSTEPPS® teamwork perceptions questionnaire.

AimThis study aimed to translate the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T‐TPQ) into Japanese and assess its validity and reliability.DesignTranslation of the T‐TPQ and a cross‐sectional survey.MethodsFollowing a forward and back translation of the questionnaire, content validity was assessed by an expert panel using item‐level content validity index. Construct validity was assessed by a confirmatory factor analysis. Further, intraclass correlation coefficient was estimated by test–retest methods.ResultsA total of 587 healthcare professionals responded to the translated T‐TPQ. The item‐level content validity index ranged between 0.8 and 1.0, indicating an acceptable content validity. The multiple fit indices showed an acceptable fitting model. Fifty‐one healthcare professionals participated in the test–retest method. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all dimensions ranged from 0.838 to 0.957, indicating acceptable test–retest reliability. Our findings suggest that the Japanese version of the T‐TPQ has acceptable validity and reliability.

Long-term effects of teamwork training on communication and teamwork climate in ambulatory reproductive health care.

We previously reported an association between team training in the ambulatory setting and improvements in team climate at 6 and 12 months, but it is unknown whether improvements persist at 2years. From 2014 to 2015, we enrolled 20 organizations, each operating a varying number of health centers, into a teamwork training initiative. We evaluated teamwork outcomes at baseline and 2years using a communication behaviors assessment, the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ), and the Patients' Insights and Views of Teamwork (PIVOT) survey. At 2years, use of TeamSTEPPS® tools and strategies remained increased compared to baseline at many health centers; results ranged from 32% of centers reporting increased use of pauses to identify the patient to 91% reporting increased use of standardized language. Staff T-TPQ responses indicated that TeamSTEPPS® implementation was associated with improved perceptions of teamwork in approximately half (49%) of statements at 2years. Significant improvements occurred in over half of PIVOT survey statements, and patient satisfaction was significantly greater at 2years compared to baseline. Patient and staff views of teamwork were significantly improved 2years after TeamSTEPPS® implementation in ambulatory reproductive health care centers, demonstrating positive long-term effects of teamwork training.

The Swedish Version of the TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ): A Validation Study.

PurposeThe delivery of effective and safe healthcare to patients is highly dependent on careful collaboration between healthcare professionals. Although teamwork is an important component for patient safety, effective teamwork is not always carried out in hospital wards, leading to negative consequences for the patients. Teamwork measurements can be used to evaluate and provide feedback to healthcare professionals to support team performance and to identify areas for improvement. The TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) evaluates Team Structure and four core competences of teamwork (Leadership, Situation Monitoring, Mutual Support, and Communication) among healthcare professionals in various healthcare settings. The questionnaire was judged to be relevant in a Swedish healthcare context and was translated into Swedish. This study aimed to test the reliability and construct validity of the Swedish version of the T-TPQ.MethodsA total of 450 (of 1176) frontline healthcare professionals working at four hospitals responded to the questionnaire. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to test the factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure internal consistency.ResultsThe hypothesized five-factor model of the five dimensions showed acceptable goodness-of-fit indexes. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total T-TPQ was 0.94, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the dimensions ranged from 0.79 to 0.92. The intercorrelation coefficients ranged from 0.27 to 0.74.ConclusionThe Swedish version of the T-TPQ showed acceptable reliability and validity for measuring healthcare professionals’ individual perceptions of teamwork at the group level. Due to the low response rate, further studies are required to test the validity of the Swedish T-TPQ.