Team Communication Research Articles

Investigating the Mediating Role of Team Communication in the Relationship between Leadership Style and Team Performance in AI-based Interaction Systems Development

This research investigates the complex interplay of leadership styles, team communication, and AI-interaction System development within the context of AI-based interaction systems development teams. The purpose is to elucidate how these variables intersect and collectively influence team performance. By exploring the dynamics specific to AI technologies, the study aims to contribute nuanced insights to the existing literature on leadership in technology-driven environments. Employing a quantitative approach, the study utilizes a structured questionnaire distributed to participants within AI development teams. The research focuses on leadership styles, encompassing both transformational and transactional approaches, team communication dynamics, and the developmental stage of AI-based interaction systems as key variables. Data analysis involves regression, mediation, and moderation analyses, facilitated by SPSS software, to uncover the relationships and interactions among these variables. Findings reveal that both transformational and transactional leadership positively influence team performance, mediated by effective team communication. Additionally, the developmental stage of AI-interaction Systems moderates these effects, highlighting the need for adaptable leadership strategies. This study addresses gaps in existing research by focusing on the specific dynamics within AI development teams, an area previously underexplored. The practical implications are significant for leaders in AI development teams, offering strategies to enhance team collaboration and performance. Key references include Bass and Riggio's work on transformational leadership and Brynjolfsson and McAfee's studies on AI's transformative potential. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of leadership in technology-driven environments, guiding organizational practices in the AI era.

Research on the application effect of inter-professional training program for newly enrolled medical staff in operating room based on digital information technology.

The operating room environment demands high levels of teamwork and interprofessional collaboration, yet current training programs often lack sufficient opportunities to develop these essential skills. Few studies have explored the impact of Interprofessional Education (IPE) based on digital information technology in improving the collaboration and learning among newly enrolled medical staff in the operating room. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate a digital information technology-based IPE training program for newly enrolled medical staff in the operating room. The evaluation focused on the effects of the program on the participants' expertise, operational knowledge, team communication skills, and application of these skills in clinical practice. Sixty-eight newly enrolled medical staff from surgical departments in a tertiary hospital in Shanxi province were included in this study from January 2021 to December 2022. The participants engaged in an IPE training curriculum that utilized digital information technology, featuring courses and case studies specifically tailored to the operating room environment. Post-training assessments included evaluation of test scores of expertise course, evaluation of surgical simulation operations (operational knowledge and communication), and the International Interprofessional Collaboration Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS). The effectiveness of the training was assessed by evaluating improvements in communication skills, application of practical knowledge, and teamwork in surgical contexts. Expertise course evaluation and reflection revealed that the new enrolled medical staff in the operating room had a deep understanding of the knowledge. At the same time, they are better able to understand and master the nursing mode in the process of different professional surgery, and said that they would like to cooperate with surgeon and anesthesiologist during the surgical operation. The score of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) increased significantly (P < 0.05), indicating that the communication and collaboration skills of the new enrolled medical staff in operating room were further improved, and that they were more familiar with the patient-centered teamwork mode. This study provides a valuable reference for the design and implementation of IPE programs based on digital information technology in the operating room. It highlights the importance of such programs in enhancing the understanding and cross-disciplinary communication skills for newly enrolled medical staff, ultimately improving patient care through better teamwork.

Factors influencing communication of virtual teams in times of pandemic: a case study in engineering education

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has forced most universities to shift from traditional face-to-face teaching to remote learning. This sudden transition has presented numerous challenges for institutions that were unaccustomed to remote work, particularly in the context of senior design projects in engineering. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the influencing factors and their relative importance in affecting team communication in senior design projects during remote work. The study used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to measure the level of importance of each factor using pairwise comparison in a structured questionnaire. The survey was distributed among group leaders of senior engineering design projects and faculty members who supervised these projects. The study identified five influencing factors: interaction and relations, trust, technology, time, and working environment. The pairwise comparison revealed that interaction and relations were the most important factor in influencing the communication process during remote work. Based on the identified influencing factors, strategies to improve the effectiveness and collaboration of remote meetings were established, providing a roadmap for universities to better prepare for future disruptions and maintain effective communication within student teams during remote work. Furthermore, these findings could have implications for other areas of higher education and the broader workplace.

Collaborative Care to Improve Quality of Life for Anxiety and Depression in Posttraumatic Epilepsy (CoCarePTE): Protocol for a Randomized Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Anxiety and depression in people with epilepsy are common and associated with poor outcomes; yet, they often go untreated due to poor mental health specialist access. Collaborative care is an integrated care model with a strong evidence base in primary care and medical settings, but it has not been evaluated in neurology clinics. Evaluating implementation outcomes when translating evidence-based interventions to new clinical settings to inform future scaling and incorporation into real-world practice is important. The Collaborative Care for Posttraumatic Epilepsy (CoCarePTE) trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness (improvement in emotional quality of life) and implementation of a collaborative care intervention for people with anxiety or depressive symptoms and posttraumatic epilepsy. CoCarePTE is a 2-site, randomized, single-blind, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial that will randomize 60 adults to receive either neurology-based collaborative care or usual care. Adults receiving neurological care at participating centers with anxiety or depressive symptoms and a history of at least mild traumatic brain injury before epilepsy onset will be enrolled. The collaborative care intervention is a 24-week stepped-care model with video or telephone calls every 2 weeks by a care manager for measurement-based anxiety and depression care, seizure care monitoring, and brief therapy intervention delivery. This is supplemented by antidepressant prescribing recommendations by psychiatrists for neurologists via case conferences and care manager-facilitated team communication. In step 2 of the intervention, individuals with <50% symptom reduction by 10 weeks will receive an added 8-session remote cognitive behavioral therapy program. The study is powered to detect a moderate improvement in emotional quality of life. As a hybrid type 1 trial, effectiveness is the primary focus, with the primary outcome being a change in emotional quality of life at 6 months in the intervention group compared to control. Secondary effectiveness outcomes are 6-month changes in depression, anxiety, and overall quality of life. Implementation outcomes, including fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, are evaluated before implementation and at 3 months. The primary effectiveness analysis will compare changes in emotional quality of life scores from baseline to 6 months between the intervention and control arms using multiple linear regression modeling, adjusting for study site and using an intent-to-treat approach. Enrollment commenced in 2023, with modifications in the inclusion and exclusion made after the first 6 enrollees due to slow recruitment. Enrollment is expected to continue at least into early 2025. The CoCarePTE trial is novel in its use of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to evaluate an evidence-based mental health intervention in epilepsy, and by incorporating seizure care into a collaborative care model. If a significant improvement in emotional quality of life is found in the intervention group compared to usual care, this would support next step scaling or clinical implementation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05353452; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05353452. DERR1-10.2196/59329.

Through Their Eyes: Using Photovoice to Capture the Capacity-Building Journey of Long Covid Patient Experts.

Long Covid, characterised by persistent symptoms following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, significantly impacts the quality of life. Engaging patients in research and care through participatory methods can enhance a shared understanding of illness and improve the relevance of research. We define Patient Experts (PEs) as persons (including patients, caregivers and providers) who have completed a series of training sessions on team building, research methods and communication at the Patient Engagement Studio, University of South Carolina (PES USC). This study explores the use of photovoice to document the experiences and capacity-building journey of Long Covid PEs within PES USC. The study employed photovoice within the COVID-19-Focused Virtual Patient Engagement Studio (CoVIP Studio). PEs submitted photographs and narratives at two distinct time points. Among the 18 PEs who participated in the project, 47 photos were collected during the training, and 31 were collected at the project's conclusion. Thematic analysis was conducted to capture changes in patient perspectives and engagement. Initial themes identified were "Hope through Community," "Collaborative Education and Research" and "Strength and Endurance." By the project's end, themes had evolved to "Working as a Team to Share and Acquire Knowledge," "Enhanced Confidence in the Future of Care" and "Perseverance and Progress." These findings highlight the transformative impact of patient engagement and the utility of photovoice in documenting longitudinal shifts in patient perspectives. Photovoice effectively engaged Long Covid patients and captured their evolving roles and perceptions as PEs. The study underscores the value of patient-led participatory methods in enhancing the relevance and applicability of clinical research, advocating for their broader adoption to improve patient-centred care and research outcomes. A CoVIP Studio stakeholder advisory board (CoVIP SAB) guided the co-development and implementation of this project. The CoVIP SAB comprised nine members with complementary skills and expertise, including three patients, three clinicians who provide care to patients with COVID-19 and three researchers with expertise in patient-centred research, COVID-19 and/or patient engagement and collaborate with patients as co-investigators. The board contributed to project design and implementation, refining photovoice prompts and shaping dissemination strategies. In addition, one PE who actively participated in all phases of the project contributed to the writing of this paper and is a coauthor. All project activities involved patients and/or caregivers with lived experience of Long Covid.

Patient Safety and Medical Error Prevention in General Practice: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Patient safety and medical error prevention remain critical issues in general practice, where medical errors can lead to adverse patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence on prevalent types of medical errors, effective prevention strategies, and outcomes of patient safety interventions within general practice settings. Following a comprehensive search across multiple databases, 52 studies published from 2014 to 2024 were included. Findings highlight medication errors, diagnostic inaccuracies, and communication lapses as the most common types of errors. Effective prevention strategies include the adoption of electronic health records (EHR), structured team communication protocols, checklist systems, and staff training programs on safety practices. These interventions have shown significant reductions in error rates and improvements in patient outcomes, though implementation is often hindered by barriers such as limited resources, resistance to change, and lack of training. This review underscores the importance of a multifaceted approach that combines technological, organizational, and educational interventions to enhance patient safety in general practice. Future research should explore long-term impacts of these interventions and address context-specific challenges to foster a culture of safety in healthcare settings.

What is known about persons with co-occurring problems’ experiences with supported housing, recovery, and health promotion? A scoping review

BackgroundHaving a home is the foundation of most people’s lives. People with co-occurring substance use and mental health problems may experience challenges in acquiring and keeping housing. Many also have major health challenges. Supported housing is the subject of increasing interest, but there seems to be a lack of studies exploring supported housing’s potential for facilitating recovery and health promotion. Therefore, a scoping review was performed to answer our review question: What is known in the literature about the experiences of persons with co-occurring substance use and mental health problems with supported housing, including experiences of recovery and health promotion?MethodsSystematic searches were conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Social Services s, Web of Science, Scopus, and Oria, and Idunn.no databases. The search terms were derived from the population, concepts, and context. The search for grey literature was conducted in various Norwegian sources.ResultsForty studies were included: 7 with quantitative design, 28 with qualitative design and 5 with mixed methods design. The studies were from Canada, Ireland, Norway, Scotland, and the USA.The review identified four themes related to tenants’ experiences with supported housing:1)The importance of a permanent and safe home; 2) Housing’s importance for physical health; 3) A shoulder to lean on – the importance of relationships and support; 4) the value of choice and independence.Factors that may influence physical health were poorly represented.ConclusionsLong-term housing and safety are prerequisites for recovery for people with co-occurring problems. Programmes such as Housing First and Assertive Community Teams, especially, were experienced to support recovery. Autonomy was valued, including access to individual and respectful support from service providers when needed.Supported housing may be a health-promoting arena, especially in relation to mental health. More attention should be given to how service providers can support tenants to protect their physical health, especially related to nutrition, meals and communal cooking. Further research is needed to tailor optimal services and support for people with co-occurring problems, including balancing support and autonomy with the aim of promoting health and recovery.Peer specialists’ contributions to supported housing are scarce and need further development.

"It's Just Really Important for us all to be on the Same Page": Qualitative Evaluation of Factors that Influence Written Mobility Communication.

Poor interdisciplinary team communication is a known barrier to increasing inpatient mobility. Understanding why and how clinicians from different disciplines communicate about mobility would help inform communication improvements. This qualitative interview study aimed to describe and explore clinician perceptions about written mobility communication, and perceived barriers and enablers to this communication. A rapid deductive qualitative approach was used to efficiently capture information for local improvement. Clinicians (physical therapists, nurses, physicians, and occupational therapists) working on 3 internal medicine wards in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Brisbane, Australia were purposefully sampled and invited to participate in individual interviews. Questions were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic methods. From 17 interviews, key themes identified that written communication about patient mobility is important and valued by clinicians; clinicians learn documentation on the job, often from physical therapists; clinicians are not aware of organizational responsibility for mobility communication; multiple purposes for written communication contribute to multiple locations and inconsistency; and clinicians perceive that improvement would require a multi-disciplinary and multi-level approach. Suggestions for improvement included use of a common language, consistent use of existing bedside communication tools, and clearer responsibility for written communication about mobility. Written communication about patient mobility was valued by clinicians and a range of barriers to effective interdisciplinary communication identified. Clear professional roles and responsibility for written mobility communication is important. Suggestions for improvement included an interdisciplinary language supported by multi-disciplinary education and organizational governance. Written communication about patient mobility is recognized as critical to safe, high-quality hospital care. Our findings suggest that successful mobility communication improvements must involve multiple disciplines and include clear organizational governance to support staff training, clear role responsibilities, and quality monitoring.

Experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic on child and adolescent psychiatric wards: multi-methods investigation.

Child and adolescent mental health service in-patient beds are unevenly spread throughout England. Where demand outstrips bed availability, young people may be admitted at-distance or to adult psychiatric wards. The COVID-19 pandemic added pressures to already overstretched services. Understanding experiences during this period is vital to inform strategies for future emergencies. To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions to local, at-distance or adult psychiatric units, from the perspectives of young people, parents/carers and healthcare professionals. Multi-methods data were collected from February 2021 to September 2022, as part of the Far Away from Home research programme. A 13-month national surveillance study collected information about admissions to general adolescent units >50 miles from home, out-of-region or to adult psychiatric units. Free-text data from respondents (n = 51) were analysed using content analysis. Interviews with young people (n = 30), parents/carers (n = 21) and healthcare professionals (n = 68) were analysed using thematic analysis. Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic affected young people's contact with others; the requirement to self-isolate on admission and following overnight leave felt distressing, and visiting was limited. This disincentivised overnight leave, leading to some discharges being delayed and others feeling rushed and high risk. The COVID-19 pandemic also accelerated the introduction of virtual meetings, enabling community teams and families to be more involved in therapies, meetings and decision-making. Restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic were often negatively perceived. However, the increased use of technology was felt to be positive, widening inclusion and mitigating some negative effects of distance on admissions.

Translating player monitoring into training prescriptions: Real world soccer scenario and practical proposals

Data-driven training prescription based on previous training or match data is thought to be associated with better training outcome, compared to prescription without considering any monitoring data. Understanding the complex relationship between training load, physical performance, fitness status, fatigue and injury risk represents a challenge for health and performance practitioners and researchers. Although studies have revealed a positive correlation between training load and injury risk, this cause-effect relation cannot be determined given the multifactorial nature of injuries. Additionally, conflicting findings have been published explaining the relationship between training load and injuries, underlining the importance of training load management, prescription, and communication within the multidisciplinary team to improve physical performance and reduce injury risk. In this sense, practitioners may benefit from practical examples based on training load data to make informed decisions for prescribing training. This narrative review provides real-world examples of training decisions based on training load data in soccer, including training prescription, drill design and multidisciplinary team communication. Finally, a framework was provided to make informed training prescription from a physiological standpoint and elucidate the relationship between training load and injury risk.

Neurosurgical applications of the exoscope: from in vitro studies to real-life surgical use in selective dorsal rhizotomy

BackgroundThe microscope has been the gold standard in neurosurgical practice due to its ability to magnify anatomical structures. However, it has limitations, including restricted visual fields and ergonomic challenges that can lead to surgeon fatigue and musculoskeletal issues. The exoscope is an emerging technology that may address these limitations by offering comparable magnification with improved ergonomics. MethodsThis study compares the traditional microscope (KINEVO 900) with a 3D digital exoscope (Aeos Digital Microscope) in visual field width, image sharpness, and ergonomic impact. Visual field assessments were conducted using millimeter paper at a fixed distance, while image sharpness was evaluated using graph paper with pins at different depths. Ergonomic evaluation involved simulating surgical positions using a spine anatomical model. The practical applicability was tested during Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) procedures, comparing the surgeon's experience with both devices over 20 consecutive cases. ResultsThe exoscope provided a larger visual field (81.18 cm2) compared to the microscope's (54.10 cm2). Image sharpness was similar for both devices across various depths and zoom levels. Ergonomically, the exoscope allowed the surgeon to maintain a neutral posture while visualizing extreme angles, unlike the microscope, which required significant upper body movement. In SDR procedures, the exoscope improved surgeon comfort and interaction with the operating team, despite an initial learning curve. ConclusionsThe exoscope presents notable advantages in terms of visual field and ergonomics. The exoscope’s ability to facilitate better posture and team communication without compromising image quality makes it an addition to neurosurgical practice, as in SDR.

Pediatric Resuscitation, Parental Presence, and Provider Perspective

Background Varying opinions and practices exist about parental presence during a pediatric resuscitation. In addition, there is a paucity of literature that investigates the perspectives of health care providers about the efficacy of parental presence in these situations. Objectives The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the perspectives of emergency health care providers about parental presence during pediatric resuscitation. Methods This pilot study surveyed emergency health care providers about their opinions of parental presence during pediatric resuscitation. All participants were given a survey with closed- and open-ended questions. Data analysis included descriptive statistics for the demographic data and qualitative analysis for the open-ended responses. Results A total of 52 emergency services personnel completed the survey. Of the physician respondents, 78.2% (n = 18) were opposed to parental presence during pediatric resuscitation. Common reasons for opposition included the lack of education, interpersonal team communication skills or experience, and discussion concerning end-of-life issues. Discussion Utilization of formal education and simulation for parental presence during resuscitation could be helpful for increasing providers’ comfort levels with parental presence.

Staff perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program in New York City safety net hospitals

BackgroundIn response to the heavy burden of untreated substance use disorders (SUD) in hospital patients, many health systems are implementing addiction consult services staffed by interprofessional teams that diagnose SUD, make recommendations for SUD care in the hospital, and link patients to post-discharge treatment. In 2018, the New York City public hospital system began rolling out the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program in six hospitals. CATCH teams are comprised of an addiction-trained medical provider, social worker or addiction counselor, and peer counselor. MethodsThe study conducted qualitative interviews with CATCH staff at all six participating hospitals as part of a pragmatic trial studying the effectiveness and implementation of CATCH. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework guided interviews conducted from 2018 to 2021 with 26 staff at the start of implementation and with 33 staff 9–12 months post-implementation. The study team created a codebook a priori and further refined it through additional coding of initial interviews. Codes were systematically analyzed using the CFIR. ResultsBarriers and facilitators spanned four CFIR domains: inner setting, outer setting, process, and individual characteristics. Barriers identified were primarily related to the outer and inner settings, including patient characteristics and limited resources (e.g. medical comorbidities, homelessness), insurance, CATCH team role confusion, and infrastructure deficits (e.g., availability of physical space). Additional barriers related to process (workload burden), and characteristics of individuals (stigma and lack of comfort treating SUD among medical teams). Facilitators were mostly related to the characteristics of individuals on the CATCH team (advantages and expertise of the CATCH peer counselor, CATCH team communication and cohesiveness) and inner setting (CATCH team relationships with hospital staff, hospital leadership buy-in and support, and infrastructure). Community networks (outer setting) and CATCH training resources (process) were also facilitators of program implementation. ConclusionAddiction consult services have great potential for improving care for hospital patients with SUD, but as new programs in busy hospital settings they face barriers to implementation that could impact their effectiveness. Barriers may be particularly impactful for programs operating in safety-net hospitals, given limited resources within the health system and the multiple and complex needs of their patients. Understanding the strengths of these programs as well as the barriers to their implementation is critical to utilizing addiction consult services effectively.

Transformational Leadership and Team Synergy in Improving Communication and Collaboration in Educational Settings

This study explores the impact of transformational leadership on team synergy, communication, and collaboration in educational environments. The purpose of the research is to examine how transformational leadership enhances team dynamics by fostering trust, communication, and participatory decision-making among teachers and staff. Utilizing a qualitative phenomenological methodology, in-depth interviews were conducted with school leaders, teachers, and administrative staff, complemented by participatory observation and document analysis. The results reveal that transformational leadership significantly improves collaboration by encouraging open communication and empowering team members to take initiative. Teachers reported feeling more motivated to innovate in their teaching methods and engage in interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as staff resistance and limited resources hindered the full adoption of collaborative practices in some schools. The study also highlights varying levels of team participation, which indicates that the effectiveness of transformational leadership depends on the leader's ability to engage all team members. The major conclusion of the study is that transformational leadership positively influences team synergy through enhanced trust and collaborative problem-solving. The findings provide important practical insights for educational leaders, suggesting that transformational leadership fosters a more inclusive and innovative school environment. This research contributes to the field by emphasizing the need for flexible leadership approaches that adapt to team dynamics and the critical importance of institutional support and resources to fully realize the benefits of transformational leadership in educational settings.

Team Tracker: A Project Management Tool

This paper introduces "Team Tracker," a project management tool developed using Asana and Next.js. The tool integrates key functionalities such as audio and video calling, real-time task tracking, and an embedded browser, creating an all-in-one solution for remote team collaboration. The objective of Team Tracker is to streamline workflow by eliminating the need for multiple platforms, thus improving team efficiency and communication. A comparative analysis with existing tools like Jira and Slack demonstrates how Team Tracker addresses the gaps in current project management solutions by offering enhanced real-time communication and task management capabilities. The system's architecture, challenges encountered during development, expected outcomes, and potential future enhancements are also discussed. Team Tracker is poised to provide a comprehensive, scalable solution for modern project management needs. Keywords: project management, Asana, Next.js, real-time communication, task tracking, Team Tracker.

The impact of team psychological safety on employee innovative performance a study with communication behavior as a mediator variable.

This study aims to delve into the impact of team psychological safety on employee innovative performance and to analyze the mediating role of communication behavior in this process. Given the central role of innovation in the sustained competitiveness of enterprises, understanding how team psychological safety promotes employee innovation through communication behavior is of significant theoretical and practical importance. The study employs a structural equation model (SEM) to analyze survey data from 580 employees across various high-tech enterprises. The results indicate that the three dimensions of team psychological safety-team collaboration and understanding, team information sharing, and team give-and-take balance-have a significant positive impact on employee innovative performance. Moreover, communication behavior plays a significant mediating role between team psychological safety and employee innovative performance. This study reveals the positive influence of team psychological safety on employee innovative performance through communication behavior, emphasizing the importance of building a positive team psychological safety environment to stimulate employee innovation potential. It provides empirical evidence for enterprise managers to optimize team communication strategies and enhance employee innovative performance.

Creating enhanced work environments for global virtual teams: using CQ as the strongest link in the team

PurposeThis study investigates how the maximum cultural intelligence (Max CQ) within a team – defined as the highest cultural intelligence level of an individual member – affects intra-team communication, conflict dynamics and, ultimately, team satisfaction and performance in global virtual teams (GVTs).Design/methodology/approachUtilizing quantitative research methods, this investigation draws on a dataset comprising 3,385 participants, which forms a total of 686 GVTs.FindingsThe study reveals that MaxCQ significantly enhances team communication, which in turn mitigates conflict, increases satisfaction and improves performance. It is noteworthy that the influence of MaxCQ on GVT success is more significant than the average cultural intelligence (CQ) of team members, providing critical insights for effective GVT management strategies.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that managers may optimize team dynamics not by uniformly increasing each member’s CQ but by concentrating on maximizing the CQ of one individual who can act as an influencer within the team. Strategically placing individuals with high CQ in GVTs can enhance overall team function.Originality/valueWhile existing literature primarily examines the individual effects of CQ on communication and conflict management, this study sheds light on the collective interplay between MaxCQ, communication and conflict. It highlights the importance of MaxCQ, along with the frequency of team communication and conflict, in influencing team satisfaction and performance in GVTs.

Mapping the landscape of front door frailty in the United Kingdom: Lessons for further afield.

The ageing global population is posing a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Healthcare needs have become more complex and the demand for services is ever increasing. Identification of frailty at the front door of hospitals can prompt comprehensive geriatric assessment and streamline patients to the most suitable clinical area. The United Kingdom has set a priority to develop front door services given the pressure on the National Health Service. A British Geriatrics Society survey has demonstrated that the majority of frailty assessments occur in the emergency department using the Clinical Frailty Scale. This survey prompted the creation of the setting up services guide and its key principles using a collaboration of experience from across the country. Understanding the systems that already exist and creating a network to enable a flow of care towards community teams is crucial to the successful provision of modern frailty attuned care.

The Intersection of Community Engagement and Team Science Research: A Scoping Review

The Intersection of Community Engagement and Team Science Research: A Scoping Review

The Impact of Soundscapes on Healthcare Teams: A Literature Review

Healthcare teams often work in complex systems where soundscapes include numerous noise sources and levels which could impact teamwork. While studies have analyzed the impact of sound on patients, articles describing clinician and clinical team experience are relatively sparse. The purpose of this literature review was to determine what is currently known about soundscapes and their impact on teamwork and team performance in hospital-based healthcare settings. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. The Input-Process-Output framework and SEIPS 2.0 model guided our review and categorization of the included studies. The work environments studied included the operating room (OR), perioperative area, and a simulation. Noise input was grouped by existing noise, music or controlled sound conditions, and communication wearables during clinical or simulated tasks. Nine of the 11 articles studied the impact sound environment on team communication and three articles measured other team processes. The findings from this review assessed both existing and experimental noise conditions discovering associations with team performance processes and outcomes. Overall, previous studies have found that noise can impact individuals and elements of teamwork, especially communication. Future research is needed to develop best practices and innovative solutions supporting a positive soundscape for teamwork.