Care Team Research Articles

Letter to the Editor: Exploring the integration of dentistry within a multidisciplinary palliative care team: does bedside dental care improve quality of life and symptom burden in inpatient palliative care patients?

Letter to the Editor: Exploring the integration of dentistry within a multidisciplinary palliative care team: does bedside dental care improve quality of life and symptom burden in inpatient palliative care patients?

Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer

ImportancePediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer.ObjectiveTo determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023.InterventionIntervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups.ResultsA total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, −2.5; 95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03593525

Symptom Screening Linked to Care Pathways for Pediatric Patients With Cancer

ImportancePediatric patients with cancer commonly experience severely bothersome symptoms. The effectiveness of routine symptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether thrice-weekly symptom screening with symptom feedback and management care pathways, compared with usual care, improves overall self-reported symptom scores measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) in pediatric patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cluster randomized trial enrolled participants between July 2021 and August 2023 from 20 pediatric cancer centers in the US. Patients newly diagnosed with cancer aged 8 to 18 years receiving any cancer treatment were included. Twenty sites were randomized to provide symptom screening (n = 10) vs usual care (n = 10); 221 participants were enrolled at intervention sites and 224 participants at control sites. The date of final follow-up was October 18, 2023.InterventionSymptom screening included providing thrice-weekly symptom screening prompts to participants, email alerts to the health care team, and locally adapted symptom management care pathway implementation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score at week 8 (range, 0-60; higher scores indicate more bothersome). Secondary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue score (mean [SD] score, 50 [10]; higher scores indicate more fatigue), Pediatric Quality of Life 3.0 Acute Cancer Module scores (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better health), symptom documentation and interventions at week 8, and unplanned health care encounters.ResultsA total of 445 participants (median [range] age, 14.8 [8.1-18.9] years; 58.9% males) were enrolled. The mean (SD) 8-week SSPedi score was 7.9 (7.2) in the symptom screening group vs 11.4 (8.7) in the usual care group. Symptom screening was associated with significantly better 8-week total SSPedi scores (adjusted mean difference, −3.8 [95% CI, −6.4 to −1.2]) and less bothersome individual symptoms, with 12 of 15 symptoms being statistically significantly reduced. There was no difference in fatigue or quality of life. The mean (SD) number of emergency department visits was 0.77 (1.12) in the symptom screening group and 0.45 (0.81) in the usual care group. There were significantly more emergency department visits in the symptom screening group (rate ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.03-2.87]).ConclusionsSymptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways was associated with improved symptom scores and increased symptom-specific interventions. Future work should integrate symptom screening into routine clinical care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04614662

Abstract 4140111: Impact of Digital Health Tools on Patients Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation

Digital health apps are novel tools that have the potential to enhance patient care. However, their benefits in the context of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are not well studied. This study aims to examine an app’s effectiveness in enhancing exercise performance. The app (KardioPAC) connects to both Bluetooth and cellular-enabled BP devices, which allows providers to monitor and communicate with patients remotely. We aim to assess the app’s impact on functional capacity (metabolic equivalents /METs) compared to standard of care (SOC) CR. This study took place at UC San Diego. Participants were recruited from CR, and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the two study arms (KardioPAC+CR vs SOC CR). The intervention group was requested to take BP at home and upload via KardioPAC. They additionally received a BP reminder daily and got an intra-app call from the care team at least every 1-2 weeks and when needed. All patients, including SOC arm, were asked to complete a pre- and post-CR visit. In each visit, several measurements (including blood pressure, METs, and quality of life questionnaires) were recorded. The study was approved by the UCSD IRB. All statistical analyses were performed on Python 3.11.8. From Jan 2023 to Mar 2024, 43 patients were enrolled. Table 1 shows their demographics. The mean METs changes are 3.68 vs 2.97 (Intervention vs Control, p=0.052). The mean METs percent changes are 104.39% vs 81.22% (Intervention vs Control, p=0.042), as plotted in Figure 1. Our study found that digital tools significantly enhance CR patients’ performance, even with a small sample size. Furthermore, we found positive signals of digital tools in reducing patients’ blood pressure and improving their quality of life. Patients’ behavior could be changed by incorporating digital tools into daily practice. Our study warrants large-scale studies to investigate the underlying mechanisms and verify the broader benefits of digital tools, including physical, mental, and social improvements.

It's All About Empowerment and Confidence: Experience of Newly Registered Nurses in an Intensive Clinical Training Course

Background This study investigated how intensive clinical nursing training influences the confidence of newly registered nurses in speaking up about their opinions and concerns within their current work settings. Method A qualitative approach with thematic analysis was used. In-depth interviews were conducted with 64 newly graduated RNs to explore their experience in attending an undergraduate intensive clinical training course. Results Four main themes emerged from the texts: (a) facing the workplace reality with confidence, (b) being equipped with knowledge and skills, (c) merging with the health care team, and (d) being empowered with high self-esteem. Conclusion The newly graduated nurses believed that the intensive clinical nursing training course enhanced their confidence, improved their communication skills, and empowered them to speak up for their rights and those of their patients. [ J Contin Educ Nurs. 202x;5x(x):xx–xx.]

Abstract Su801: Use of Large Language Models to Optimize Clinical Text Analysis for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Identification

Introduction/Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is experienced by approximately 300,000 patients annually in the US. While individual care teams can readily identify IHCA at the bedside, the reporting of these events after the event often lacks consistency and poses a major challenge for hospitals across the US. Accurate and timely reporting of IHCA events is crucial for facilitating QI initiatives, such as CPR quality review, optimizing team performance, and benchmarking IHCA outcomes. Hypothesis: Large language models (LLMs) can be used to identify IHCA events at the patient encounter-level by analyzing targeted note types from the inpatient record with high performance. Methods: Adult (≥18 years old) inpatient encounters at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 06/2018 to 03/2022 with a reported clinical emergency were identified from a QI database. Discharge summaries and notes associated with the encounters of interest were extracted from the EHR and deidentified using a natural language processing tool. Notes were reviewed by research staff to ascertain true IHCA events. Positive IHCA was defined as the loss of pulses followed by the delivery of CPR. An LLM, GPT4 v. 32K-Chat, was employed on the Penn Medicine Microsoft Azure Databricks environment to compare zero- and few-shot prompting methods to identify IHCA. Model performance was measured using accuracy, precision, recall and F1 scores. Results: Manual chart review determined 96.8% and 3.2% of cases to be IHCA+ and IHCA-, respectively. A balanced pilot dataset of positive and negative cases was created and the accuracy values across strategically sampled note types was checked. Using zero-shot learning with Chain-of-Thought (COT) prompting, the LLM performed with an accuracy of 86%, precision of 77%, recall of 100%, and F1-score of 87%. Using three-shot learning with COT, the LLM performed with an accuracy of 90%, precision of 83%, recall of 100%, and F1-score of 91%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential efficacy of leveraging LLMs to automatically classify IHCA from strategically sampled note types using both zero and few-shot learning approaches. In the future, we will implement temporal sampling of note types and refine model parameters such as output token size and temperature. These findings suggest that such technologies can be effective in real-world clinical settings, providing a scalable solution to improve patient outcomes and quality improvement efforts.

QOL-04. THE UNDER-UTILIZATION OF PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICES BY PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA HIGHLIGHTS THE IMPORTANCE OF DISCUSSIONS AROUND PALLIATIVE CARE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH CARE PARTNERS OF PATIENTS WITH GBM RECRUITED FROM FACEBOOK SUPPORT GROUPS

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a terminal brain cancer that has a rapid onset and results in symptoms such as headaches, vomiting, seizures, anxiety, depression, agitation, speech impairment, memory impairment, infections, brain bleeds, mobility changes, changes in sleep patterns, and cognitive changes. Palliative care helps patients diagnosed with an incurable or chronic disease manage physical, social, and psychological symptoms and has been shown to increase survival for patients with cancer. Previous data of former care partners of patients with GBM indicated only 30% of patients used palliative care whereas 90% used hospice. To better understand the reasons for underutilization of palliative care patients with GBM, 38-question survey about the use of palliative care, type of medical center where treatment occurred, and discussions with care team members about palliative care was given to current care partners recruited from Facebook support groups in February 2024. Inclusion criteria: current primary care partner of a patient with GBM, over the age of 18, and willing to participate (IRB exempt; H24-0393). The care partner was excluded if their patient was no longer living. Of the 77 current care partners, 56 reported they did not use palliative care as part of their care team. The use of palliative care was similar among care facilities (community hospital, major medical center, university hospital, brain tumor center). When care team members discussed palliative care with patients and their care partners (n=21), 71% of the dyads used palliative care. When care team members did not discuss palliative care (n=56), the use of palliative care was much lower at 7%. Interestingly, 55% of respondents reported they would benefit from knowing more about ways to increase physical and emotional support. This data suggests discussions around palliative care increase the use of palliative care services among patients with GBM and their care partners.

EOLP-01. PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR A PILOT MULTIDISCIPLINARY BEREAVEMENT FOLLOW-UP AND BRAIN AUTOPSY REVIEW FOR BEREAVED CAREGIVERS IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY

Abstract INTRODUCTION Brain tumors remain the leading cause of cancer-related death in children. The death of a child is distressing for caregivers and often associated with negative psychosocial outcomes. Bereaved caregivers frequently desire ongoing support after their child’s death. At our institution, brain autopsies with the option for tissue donation to research are offered to all families after the death of a child. Specific follow-up conducted to date and review of autopsy results have varied widely. We propose a pilot study to (1) evaluate feasibility of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary bereavement follow-up meeting with autopsy results review and grief supports for bereaved caregivers in pediatric neuro-oncology at Nationwide Children’s Hospital and (2) assess caregiver and provider perceptions regarding this follow-up meeting using mixed-methods design. METHODS/DESIGN Bereaved caregivers of children with a brain tumor who died and underwent brain autopsy through our institutional tissue donation protocol will be offered a follow-up meeting after their child’s death. The follow-up meeting will test an established PICU bereavement framework in the pediatric neuro-oncology setting with the addition of brain autopsy results review. Meetings will include caregivers and providers from neuro-oncology, palliative care, and psychosocial team (e.g., psychologist, social worker, chaplain). Caregivers will complete a Likert-scale questionnaire followed by a semi-structured interview via telephone. The goal is to conduct 7-10 meetings. Providers will participate in a focus group to provide feedback. Interviews and the focus group will be recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. Concepts to be explored include perceived need for follow up; overall experience; satisfaction with structure, modality, and content; and perceived benefit and meaning of autopsy review. LONG-TERM GOAL To develop, evaluate, and formalize a comprehensive multidisciplinary bereavement follow-up meeting, guided by caregiver and provider feedback, that can be expanded to other institutions and become a “standard of care” for bereaved caregivers in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Collecting sociodemographic data in primary care: Qualitative interviews in community health centers

BackgroundMany primary care organizations do not routinely collect sociodemographic data (SDD) such as race, gender, or income despite the importance of this data in addressing health disparities.AimTo understand the experiences of primary care providers and staff in collecting SDD.Design & settingA qualitative interview study with 33 primary care and interprofessional team members from eight Ontario Community Health Centres (CHCs).MethodSemi-structured virtual interviews and content analysis of interview transcripts.ResultsParticipants reported using both formal methods of SDD collection, and informal methods of SDD collection that were more organic, varied, and conducted over time. Participants discussed sometimes feeling uncomfortable collecting this data formally, as well as associated burden and limited resources to support collection. Client-provider rapport was noted as facilitating data collection and participants suggested more training, streamlined data collection, and better communication about purpose and use of data.ConclusionSDD can be collected informally or formally but there are limitations to informally collected data and barriers to the adoption of formal processes.

“It is not the fault of the health care team - it is the way the system works”: a mixed-methods quality improvement study of patients with advanced cancer and family members reveals challenges navigating a fragmented healthcare system and the administrative and financial burdens of care

Abstract Background Healthcare fragmentation and lack of care coordination are longstanding problems in cancer care. This study’s goal was to provide in-depth understanding of how the organization and fragmentation of healthcare impacts the experiences of patients with advanced cancer and their families, especially near the end-of-life. Methods This mixed-methods quality improvement study took place at a large multi-specialty healthcare organization in Northern California. Electronic health record data was used to identify patients with advanced cancer and their characteristics. Data were collected 10/2019-05/2022 through periodic patient surveys and in-depth interviews with sampled family members, including open-ended questions about overall healthcare experiences. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Overall, 281/482 (58.3%) patients with advanced cancer completed surveys. Surveyed patients’ mean age was 68 (SD: 12.8) years, 53% were male, 73% White, 14.2% Asian, 1.4% Black, 3.9% Other; 8.9% Hispanic, and 19.2% were deceased within 12 months. Twenty-four family members completed in-depth interviews: 17/24 (70.8%) were spouses, 62.5% were female and 50% were interviewed after the patient’s death. Respondents were generally positive about health care team interactions, but consistently brought up the negative impacts of the organization of healthcare, “It is not the fault of the health care team - it is the way the system works.” Three major challenges were identified. (1) Systemic healthcare care fragmentation, including difficulties navigating care across providers and institutions, “It seems like everything is like an isolated incident… there’s no overall, big picture viewpoint.” (2) Administrative burdens, “In the end I gave up [scheduling care] because I was tired of calling.” (3) Financial burdens, “This oncologist wanted to put him on a drug…but it was $4000 a month.” Respondents described these challenges leading to worse quality of care, health, and quality of life, and loss of trust in the national healthcare system. Conclusions These findings illustrate how care fragmentation and administrative and financial burdens lead to worse quality care and distrust of healthcare. Better coordination of patient-centered care, and a fundamental restructuring of a highly fragmented national healthcare system are required to meet the needs of patients with complex conditions like advanced cancer and their families.

Interprofessional collaboration between hospital-based palliative care teams and general healthcare workers: A realist review protocol

Background Palliative care, vital for patients with advanced, life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses, faces an increasing global demand due to aging populations and rising non-communicable diseases. Specialized palliative care teams (PCTs) within hospitals significantly impact patient outcomes, which requires effective interprofessional collaboration with general healthcare workers. Therefore, We will conduct a realist review to explore the contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes related to the interprofessional collaboration between PCTs and general healthcare workers. Methods Grounded in the third generation Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, this review will follow 5-step iterative process. First, a preliminary literature search will define the review scope. Second, based on the preliminary searches an initial program theory will be developed. Third, systematic searches across PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, Web of Science, and Scopus will be caried out. Fourth, data extraction of included studies will be conducted. Simultaneously, relevance and rigour of individual studies will be evaluated. Lastly, data analysis and synthesis will be conducted in which identified individual Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations will be combined in chains of inference through which hypotheses can be formulated. In summary, this realist review will refine an initially developed program theory, producing a framework elucidating how interprofessional collaboration works between PCTs and general healthcare workers. Discussion This review aims to provide crucial insights into interprofessional collaboration between PCTs and general healthcare workers, informing optimized palliative care delivery in acute care hospitals for diverse stakeholders.

INNV-33. ADVANCING PRECISION TREATMENT FOR DIFFUSE MIDLINE GLIOMA: THE DMG LEARNING HUB INITIATIVE

Abstract Diffuse Midline Glioma (DMG) poses a significant challenge in neuro-oncology due to its heterogeneous presentation and limited therapeutic options. Clinical trials often serve as the primary avenue for treatment, yet families encounter numerous barriers in navigating and selecting appropriate trials. Health disparities, including disparities in medical literacy and access to specialized medical centers, further complicate decision-making processes. Existing registries lack comprehensive data integration, focusing on isolated perspectives of either research or clinical data, neglecting the holistic patient profile. Evaluation of treatment endpoints beyond Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) remain inconsistent, despite being a priority for families. The DMG Learning Hub emerges as a transformative platform designed to empower families by offering informed options and guidance while fostering a collaborative environment where patient families actively contribute to shaping the landscape of clinical trials. Leveraging AI-assisted matching, the platform assists families in navigating the complex decision-making process surrounding clinical trial participation. The inclusion of a patient-reported outcome journal feature enables families to track vital information such as symptom changes and supplement usage, with autonomy over the timing of shared data. Using real-time data sharing facilitates invaluable insights for researchers, bridging gaps that would otherwise be overlooked and enriching the collective understanding of DMG. Harmonizing molecular, imaging, and clinical data within the platform equips care teams with comprehensive, near-real-time information crucial for personalized treatment strategies. This integrated approach not only supports the inclusion of n-of-1 arms in current trials but also extends therapeutic opportunities to patients previously ineligible for studies due to specific disease markers or progression patterns. The DMG Learning Hub represents a significant stride towards precision oncology by synergizing patient-centric priorities with cutting-edge technology, integrating harmonized data, and fostering collaborative efforts, the initiative heralds a promising era of personalized treatment for DMG and beyond the neuro-oncology community.

Dental Hygienists' Influence on Oral Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavioural of Patients and Effectiveness on Improving Patients' Periodontal Status—Evaluations of a Hospital Based Oral Hygiene Training Program in China

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo evaluate the possibility of integrating dental hygienists (DHs) into the dental field in China, and investigate its effectiveness on improving patients' knowledge, attitudes, self‐care behaviours as well as their periodontal status.MethodsA hospital‐based oral hygiene training program was developed at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital's (SRRSH) Dental Clinic with the support of two registered DHs from Loma Linda University in California. A questionnaire evaluating oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviours was conducted in patients who visited SRRSH's Dental Clinic. Scores of oral health knowledge and proportions of positive oral health attitudes and favourable self‐care behaviours were estimated between patients treated and not treated by DHs (DH group and NDH group). The improvements in patients' periodontal conditions following non‐surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) administered by DHs at the Dental Clinic of SRRSH, as assessed through the measurement of periodontal pocket depths and the incidence of bleeding upon probing.ResultsPatients in DH group exhibited relatively better results in several aspects of oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviours, compared to those in NDH group. Moreover, NPST performed by DHs significantly improved the periodontal status of the patients, with a remarkably reduction in periodontal pocket depth and bleeding on probing.ConclusionsIntegrating DHs into SRRSH's Dental Clinic showed effectiveness in enhancing patients' oral health knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and succeeded in improving patients' periodontal status. This program demonstrated that incorporating DHs into dental care team is not only practical but also enhances the value of the dental workforce in China.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical office assistants (MOAs) Working in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

BackgroundMedical Office Assistants (MOAs), also known as receptionists and clerks, are front line workers and the most accessible member of the primary care team. Historically, their contributions to primary care have been unrecognised and undervalued. The COVID-19 pandemic put pressure on existing roles and systems in primary care: how MOAs adapted is unknown.AimTo explore the experiences of MOAs working in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspectives of MOAs and family physicians (FPs) who worked with MOAs during this period.Design & settingA qualitative study using Constructivist Grounded Theory, conducted in Ontario, CanadaMethodSeventeen participants were recruited through professional contacts of the research team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with MOAs and FPs across the province.ResultsMOAs’ many responsibilities in primary care intensified during the pandemic. MOAs leveraged their healthcare system knowledge and therapeutic relationships with patients to reduce patient distress. Unfortunately, MOAs experienced more frustration, and in some cases, abuse from patients. MOAs' ability to adapt to new systems and respond to high patient needs seemed to be positively influenced by their relationships with patients and FPs. FPs expressed concern for MOA welfare and recognised their critical role on primary care teams.ConclusionMOAs made significant contributions to primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests MOAs have greater capacity than previously recognised which has important implications for planning in an era of under-resourced healthcare.

Navigating Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking in Hospice Settings

This article explores current global research on voluntarily stopping eating and drinking (VSED) and presents a detailed, deidentified case study of a patient who elected VSED in a hospice setting in the Southeastern United States. It highlights the collaborative efforts of health care professionals in effectively supporting the patient and family, sharing multiple perspectives from various health care team members who cared for the patient and family. It offers evidence-based recommendations to guide health care teams through the ethical, medical, and emotional challenges of VSED, ensuring compassionate and competent care. The article emphasizes the importance of structured protocols and empathetic care in hospice settings, advocating for the education and preparation of health care teams and families to address the complex challenges associated with VSED. By promoting open communication, interdisciplinary collaboration, and comprehensive support, hospices can respect the autonomy of patients and families choosing VSED, ensuring a compassionate and dignified end-of-life experience.

Machine Learning Model for Predicting Walking Ability in Lower Limb Amputees

Background/Objectives: The number of individuals with lower limb loss (LLL) is rising. Therefore, identifying the walking potential in individuals with LLL and prescribing adequate prosthetic systems are crucial. Various factors can influence participants’ walking ability, to different extents. The aim of the present study was to apply machine learning methods to develop a predictive mode. This model can assist rehabilitation and limb loss care teams in making informed decisions regarding prosthesis prescription and predicting walking ability in individuals with LLL. Methods: The present study was designed as a prospective cross-sectional study encompassing 104 consecutively recruited participants with LLL (average age 62.1 ± 10.9 years, 80 (76.9%) men) at the Medical Rehabilitation Clinic. Demographic, physical, psychological, and social status data of patients were collected at the beginning of the rehabilitation program. At the end of the treatment, K-level estimation of functional ability, a Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and a Two-Minute Walking Test (TMWT) were performed. Support vector machines (SVM) were used to develop the prediction model. Results: Three decision trees were created, one for each output, as follows: K-level, TUG, and TMWT. For all three outputs, there were eight significant predictors (balance, body mass index, age, Beck depression inventory, amputation level, muscle strength of the residual extremity hip extensors, intact extremity (IE) plantar flexors, and IE hip extensors). For the K-level, the ninth predictor was The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Conclusions: Using the SVM model, we can predict the K-level, TUG, and TMWT with high accuracy. These clinical assessments could be incorporated into routine clinical practice to guide clinicians and inform patients of their potential level of ambulation.

Exploring the oral health status of children living with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE): A caregiver described self‐report

AbstractIntroductionHypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) is a birth complication due to loss of oxygen flow, resulting in a wide range of physical and cognitive differences often requiring support from multidisciplinary healthcare teams. Despite this population's increased need, little is known about their oral health status and the role of the dentist as a member of the care team.MethodsA 32‐item oral health questionnaire was shared to 8700 members within the patient advocacy non‐profit, Hope for HIE's, Facebook group. The survey assessed caregiver‐reported oral health status and facilitators and barriers to receiving dental care.ResultsTwo hundred sixty‐two individuals responded to the survey. The majority were white (90%, 177/196) parents of children with HIE (99%, 259/262) that lived in the U.S. (76%, 148/195) and cared for children under 3 (42%, 106/251). 36% (85/236) reported cavity experience, 81% (180/223) reported visiting the dentist for a dental check‐up, however, 58% (147/255) considered the dentist to be a member of their child's care team.ConclusionChildren diagnosed with HIE likely experience similar oral health status as their peers, however, qualitative developmental work is necessary to assess facilitators and barriers to receiving dental care, and how to integrate the dentist into the care team.

Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience in Istanbul

Background: Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood. With the help of increased clinical awareness, improvements in imaging methods, and the identification of molecular characteristics, advances have been made in both diagnosis and treatment. Objectives: In our study, we aimed to discuss the childhood brain tumor cases followed in our clinic, along with their clinical and epidemiological features and treatment outcomes. Methods: The study group comprised children younger than 18 years old who were followed in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Clinic of Istanbul Medical Faculty and diagnosed with a brain tumor over the past 5 years (2018 - 2023). Symptoms, age at diagnosis, treatment options (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy), and side effects were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Thirty children were diagnosed with brain tumors. Of the patients, 14 (47%) were male and 16 (53%) were female. The mean age of the children was 8.8 ± 3.1 years, and the mean age at diagnosis was 65.6 ± 37.7 months. The most common symptom was vomiting (40%). The mean duration between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 3.8 months, with a median of 1 month. Of the patients, 60% were diagnosed with glial tumors and 40% with non-glial tumors. Gross total resection (GTR) was performed in 26% of patients, subtotal resection (STR) in 37%, and 37% of patients did not undergo surgery. Seventy-seven percent of the patients received chemotherapy, and 57% received radiotherapy. Of the patients, 57% were considered responsive to treatment (complete/partial), 30% had stable disease, and 13% had progressive disease. The overall brain tumor mortality rate in our clinic was 13%. While 73% of our 26 patients had no or mild neurological deficits, 27% had moderate to severe disabilities (gait impairment, hearing impairment, visual impairment). Conclusion: Although the sample size was limited, it may be speculated that the surgery rate was low and long-term side effects were notable. Insufficient surgical resection can affect the treatment response and increase the risk of neurological sequelae and functional impairment. Molecular profiling should be expanded, and a palliative care team should be involved as early as possible to address long-term side effects and improve the quality of life for patients.

Harmonizing high-risk pregnancies: A comprehensive investigation into maternal and fetal well-being

High-risk pregnancies are a global concern, with maternal and fetal well-being at the forefront of clinical care. Pregnancy’s three trimesters bring distinct changes to mothers and fetal development, impacting maternal health through hormonal, physical, and emotional shifts. Fetal well-being is influenced by organ development, nutrition, oxygenation, and environmental exposures. Effective management of high-risk pregnancies necessitates a specialized, multidisciplinary approach. To comprehend this integrated approach, a comparative literature analysis using Atlas.ti software is essential. Findings reveal key aspects vital to high-risk pregnancy care, including intervention effectiveness, case characteristics, regional variations, economic implications, psychosocial impacts, holistic care, longitudinal studies, cultural factors, technological influences, and educational strategies. These findings inform current clinical practices and drive further research. Integration of knowledge across multidisciplinary care teams is pivotal for enhancing care for high-risk pregnancies, promoting maternal and fetal well-being worldwide.

Patient Experiences of Long-term Pain and Pain Management Following Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Although pain may persist for patients who undergo pelvic exenteration for treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer, studies exploring patient experience of postoperative pain and its management remains limited. This study aimed to explore patient experiences of postoperative chronic pain and management following pelvic exenteration. Qualitative cohort study of patients who have undergone pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer. The study was conducted through one-on-one semi-structured telephone interviews. Seventeen patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer who underwent pelvic exenteration between January 2018 and December 2020 were included. Semi-structured interviews explored participants' experiences of pain including its impact on life and management strategies at six and twelve months following exenteration. Interview transcripts were analyzed by two researchers using inductive thematic analysis. Participant experiences of pain following exenteration are reflected by three themes identified: 1) adapting to long-term consequences of pelvic exenteration including pain, 2) reluctance to take pain medications, 3) engaging multidisciplinary care team is essential to post-pelvic exenteration chronic pain management. Several participants reported ongoing intermittent pain following surgery that significantly affected various aspects of their lives. This prompted participants to adapt their lifestyle and explore alternative pain relief methods as some were hesitant to rely on analgesics. The small sample size from a single center whereby all patients underwent curative pelvic exenteration for lower recurrent rectal cancer with none undergoing the procedure for palliation limits the generalizability of the results of this study. While chronic pain following pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer interferes with patient's postoperative quality of life, analgesia use was influenced by pain habituation and fear of dependence on pain medications. Our findings emphasize the further need to investigate a multidisciplinary approach, including non-pharmacological methods, for optimization of pain outcomes following pelvic exenteration. See Video Abstract.